Federal Adoption Law Leads States To Prematurely Separate Families
For 25 years, the law has been giving states kickbacks when they finalize adoptions quickly.

Between 2015 and 2019, parents of roughly 327,000 children across the country saw their parental rights terminated. In 20 percent of those cases, parents lost their rights less than a year after their child was first seized and taken into state custody.
According to one recent study, the rate of parental rights termination has increased, with the likelihood that a child will experience this kind of separation roughly doubling between 2000 and 2016.
While the opioid crisis is a driving force in the increase in parental terminations, a 1997 law is making matters much worse—giving states direct financial incentives to increase the number of adoptions from foster care and giving biological parents less time and less leeway to prove they should keep their own children.
In 1997, Congress passed the Adoption and Safe Families Act. The law was designed to decrease the number of children who languish in foster care by incentivizing states to increase the number of children who are adopted from foster care. According to an investigation published in December by NBC News and ProPublica, the law created a "ticking clock" for children in state custody, requiring the state to file for termination of parental rights after 15 months in most cases. Noncompliant states risk losing federal funding, and states that increase adoptions received financial rewards for every child adopted.
The law has been incredibly effective, leading to adoptions from foster care rising over 100 percent from 1997 to 2019, despite the overall decrease in the foster care population. In West Virginia, the state has received more in payouts from the government for terminating families than any other, having received $24 million in incentive payments since FY 1998—making it the most-rewarded state by child population.
However, while couples wishing to adopt may have benefited from the law, biological parents under state scrutiny have suffered tremendously.
NBC News/ProPublica's investigation covers West Virginia's particularly fast terminations of parental rights. One couple interviewed during the investigation, Jackie and Wes Snodgrass, had their parental rights terminated after just five months. While the Snodgrasses were never accused of abusing their children, the couple's periodic struggles with substance use, as well as their daughters' low school attendance, caused authorities to take custody of their two daughters in 2021. Their parental rights have now been terminated, and the couple is barred from contacting or visiting their children, though both girls have expressed a strong desire to see their mother.
"There's, like, anger or something behind it," Jackie Snodgrass told NBC News and ProPublica. "It seemed way too fast, but it also feels like years since I've seen my kids."
West Virginia is one of two states where, on average, it takes less than one year to terminate parental rights following a child's removal. According to NBC and ProPublica, 2 percent of West Virginia's children lost both parents to parental rights termination between 2015 and 2019.
"There is no advocacy for the biological parents in this state. There's none," one West Virginia state delegate told NBC News and ProPublica.
While the Adoption and Safe Families Act has been on the books for 25 years, many of its original supporters now argue that the time has come to repeal or amend the law, claiming that states are forced to move far too quickly when deciding to sever parental rights.
Maureen Flatley is a child welfare policy consultant who helped write the Adoption and Safe Families Act as well as recent legislation attempting to improve protections for parents and increase family reunification. In an interview, she told NBC and ProPublica "We can't pretend anymore that adoption is just some magic panacea." In another interview with The Imprint, she said, "By maintaining those family connections and those relationships, we may be able to mitigate and limit the number of kids who are aging out [of foster care] alone."
"It's indefensible to have such short timelines," Eleanor Holmes Norton, the Democrat nonvoting delegate of Washington, D.C., in the House of Representatives, told NBC News and ProPublica. "The most important relationship in a family is the relationship between parents and children… We should do everything we can to preserve that."
While a 2018 federal law attempted to divert federal funding for foster care services toward programs that keep families together—like parenting classes and addiction treatment, NBC News and ProPublica report that states have lagged in implementing it.
The Adoption and Safe Families Act creates troubling incentives for fast family separation around the country, even when it doesn't always make sense for parents or children. However, as long as states receive financial kickbacks for separating families, it's hard to imagine real improvement.
"I felt real low," Wes Snodgrass told NBC News and ProPublica, discussing his separation from his daughters. "I felt like I didn't have a family no more."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"There is no advocacy for the biological parents in this state. There's none," one West Virginia state delegate told NBC News and ProPublica.
Fucking conservative anti-LGBTQ bigot.
Cash generating easy and fast method to work in part time and earn extra $15,000 or even more than this online. by working in 1ce85 my spare time. I made $17250 in my previous (ste-03) month and i am very happy now because of this job. you can try this now by follow
details here…….…….…….…….…….…….… http://Www.workstar24.com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
LOL... Right; Heaven forbid people acknowledge nature or something. Dissolution is the new woke-world. Where politicians will see exactly just how propaganda-stupid can the people get/take?
I’ve earned $17,910 this month by working online from home. I work only six hours a day despite being a full-time college student. Everyone is capable of carrying out this work from their homes and learning it in spare time on a continuous basis.
To learn more, see this article———>>> http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Twitter Files!
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372352872783872
1.THREAD: The Twitter Files
How Twitter Let the Intelligence Community In
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Pfizer Files too!
https://mobile.twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1610375042940153856
1/ THREAD???? #PfizerFiles
Pfizer has habitually engaged in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribed physicians, & suppressed adverse trial results.
This is no secret, yet this fact continues to be brushed under the rug by politicians & the media.
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1610372352872783872?t=io72_T7gQaePQ8pxxOnx7A&s=19
1.THREAD: The Twitter Files
How Twitter Let the Intelligence Community In
[Thread]
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.WORKSCLICK.COM
Remember that day the people passed a US Constitutional amendment giving the 'Feds' authority to legislate families?
Yeah; Me neither...
F'En National Sozialists(Nazi's)..
Silly TJ. Nobody reads the entire Constitution anymore. Just the Cliff Notes.
"Congress has the power to do anything necessary and proper to regulate commerce and promote the general welfare."
That's it. That's the whole thing, right there. They do what they want because fuck you that's why.
Very True. Conquered and Destroyed by FYTW Power-Mad mentality manipulating and deceiving the very definition of the USA for their Armed-Theft National Sozialist(Nazi)-Empire building desires.
That day Conquer and Consume motives took over Liberty and Justice.
Funny how Reason only takes this up when the DNC is in a full press to normalize the abuse of children. "For the children" my ass, you're just looking to take your frustrations with the world out on people that cannot defend themselves. Please find me a case of a stellar parent terminated from their kid (and the father of the Younger case doesn't count here).
Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.
The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.
But, you will say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.
And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention, direct or indirect, of society by means of schools, etc.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.
The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor.