Review: When Americans Turned Their Backs on Holocaust Refugees
The U.S. and the Holocaust condemns anti-refugee policies of the World War II era.

Otto Frank—father of Anne, the teenager whose posthumously published diary became standard reading for students learning about the Holocaust—fled with his family from Germany to Amsterdam in 1933. But the Nazis eventually followed him there. One target of their 1940 bombing campaign was the U.S. consulate in Rotterdam, where Frank's visa application was destroyed along with everything else.
In The U.S. and the Holocaust, a three-part PBS documentary by Ken Burns, Lynn Novick, and Sarah Botstein, the Frank family's repeatedly frustrated escape attempts epitomize the challenge facing Jews as they confronted a regime intent on eliminating them. Hitler initially sought to purify the Third Reich by pressuring Jews to emigrate. But other nations generally did not want them, which the Nazis thought proved their point. Meanwhile, Germany's invasions of other countries reduced the number of possible refuges.
The United States was an obvious candidate to accept people threatened by the Nazis. But decades of increasingly restrictive immigration policies had made that option a privilege reserved for the lucky few. They included luminaries such as Albert Einstein, but they did not include the Franks or millions of others eventually murdered by the Reich.
While Burns et al. emphasize the antisemitism that pervaded the State Department, they also note that neither Congress nor the general public was inclined to admit more than a trickle of refugees. That attitude prevailed not only after the Nazi persecution of Jews had been widely covered in the U.S. press but even after the war, when the genocidal nature of that campaign was horrifyingly clear. Notwithstanding the welcoming promise inscribed at the Statue of Liberty, Burns observed in an interview with Reason's Nick Gillespie, there has always been "a significant push" against accepting newcomers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nice article
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I’m currently generating over $35,100 a month thanks to one small internet job, therefore I really like your work! I am aware that with a beginning cdx05 capital of $28,800, you are cdx02 presently making a sizeable quantity of money online.
Just Check ———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
So it's not just Republicans that are Nazis but politicians of all stripes in Central America are Nazis too? That's a hell of a lot of Nazis. I can see why they're winning. I think we need to not only accept all the refugees fleeing the Nazis, but we should declare war on the Nazis, take the evil bastards out. Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico - kill every last one of those fuckers running those evil governments.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
To paraphrase Muhammad Ali, ain't no Nazi ever called me a racist.
The highly restrictive immigration policy FDR enforced in the 1940s is different from the policy debates we have today, where it's an argument between a generous immigration policy on the one hand, and leaving the gates open and unlocked, on the other hand.
That's not The Narrative.
Consistently made over $20,00 in income from home with the benefit of smooth playback and sticky online interest. |F330″ I actually made $18,00 with this perfect home income. Everyone can now without a doubt.
…
make extra money online by using—— https://ukincome6.blogspot.com
"They included luminaries such as Albert Einstein, but they did not include the Franks or millions of others eventually murdered by the Reich."
The Franks visa paperwork was destroyed by German bombing, and that is the fault of the United States policy how?
Surely there is a better example of US policy being malicious, but I suppose it would not include the emotional cachet of including the one Holocaust victim almost everyone knows about.
Also odd how bad things that happen under Republicans are the fault of Republicans while bad things that happen under Democrats are the failings of America.
While Burns et al. emphasize the antisemitism that pervaded the State Department
Does Burns mention the State Department was by then captured by the Comintern, or is that not relevant to the guilt trip?
Yeah, I can't keep up. Is antisemitism officially sanctioned this week or not?
I’m making more than $57k by just doing very easy and simple online job from home.Last month my friend sis received $94280 from this work by just giving only 10 to 12 hrs a day.Everybody start earning money online. visit for more details…
This is what I do …> http://Www.onlinecash1.com
Notwithstanding the welcoming promise inscribed at the Statue of Liberty, Burns observed in an interview with Reason's Nick Gillespie, there has always been "a significant push" against accepting newcomers.
Not to mention the counter "significant push" to shove them down our throats, anyway.
For those of you who didn't see this when it was originally televised - yes, the closing ties it to Trump.
Not kidding.
As it should. Trump's anti-immigration stance (along with that of his cult followers) was a disgrace.
One target of their 1940 bombing campaign was the U.S. consulate in Rotterdam
OMFG. The target of the bombing of Rotterdam was to:
1. Force The Netherlands surrender.
2. To let the world see the power of the Luftwaffe (the city center was reduced to rubble after they surrendered).
Actually, Germany and Netherlands were not on the same standard time, and this led to a miscommunication regarding surrender. But the end result was the bombings which for western media and govts seemed to support the Italian theorist (can't recall his name) in the 30' who said bombing cities would end wars quickly..it doesn't by the way
No Herr Misek….yet.
He denies that this documentary ever happened.
And no one can refute him blah blah blah
I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is where i started………….>>> http://Www.onlinecareer1.com
Well they do believe they're God's chosen people and when the Messiah comes they're going to rule the world and the rest of us will be their slaves so...
Approx 6M eastern European Jews immigrated to the US along with millions of Italians and smaller numbers of southern Europeans from 1880 through 1920 joining the millions of Germans and Irish who proceeded them earlier in the 19th century. The joke in Jewish circles was these Ashkenazi immigrants had three things in common: they were Secularists, Socialists, and Zionists. Many Jews who immigrated supported the Bolsheviks and socialists (see Churchill's article on National Jews versus International Jews...today it would be called anti-semitic) and the majority of spies for the USSR who did not do it for money were Russian Jews. And you had "Old world" issues with Jewish immigrants and other European Christian immigrants' on traditional morals which cosmo European Jews often had more "edgy" pov. You see this even today, most of the media that is Jewish is far left on social issues and supportive of wokeness (Look at Reason for example) These factors in the 30's perhaps not spoken in public had an impact on FDR. He didn't want a few more million pro socialists showing up causing him problems with his blue collar European Ethnic base. And given the Great Depression would letting in millions while the unemployment rate was over 10% make sense? FDR made a political decision. Was it antisemitic? Maybe or maybe it was just a political decision.
One could make a moral argument that FDR should have allowed the asylum but where does that end? Hindsight is 20/20 isn't it? For example, should we (and I support this 100%) allow 10M Palestinians asylum given Israel is never going to allow a real two state solution? They are hardworking, well educated, conservative in social views and would bring a balance to foreign policy. Would Reason support that?
If only we could find a way to be that based again.
And that is perfectly fine: the US is under no obligation to let in millions of people from halfway around the world for any reason.
And for some reason, Americans misinterpret "refugee status" to mean "immigrants"; refugee status is supposed to be temporary, with repatriation at the end of the war.