Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Government Spending

Why Does Funding Government Take $1.7 Trillion and 4,000 Pages?

Plus: Title 42 order termination is on hold, the FTC vs. Meta, and more...

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.20.2022 9:47 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Rand Paul talking government spending | Rod Lamkey - CNP / Avalon/Newscom
(Rod Lamkey - CNP / Avalon/Newscom)

The omnibus bill to fund government operations through September 2023 is out—all 4,000 pages of it. Despite the measure's massive size and price tag, lawmakers' aim is to rush it through both chambers of Congress by Thursday so President Joe Biden can sign it on Friday.

The text of the $1.7 trillion spending bill was just released by the Senate and House appropriations committees this morning, so everyone's still scrambling to figure out what is in it and what is not. What we do know: Lawmakers are giving all sorts of government agencies and programs way more money than they did in 2022 and more than Biden's budget requested. We also know it's devoid of several good measures discussed as potential add-ons.

Tax Cuts, TikTok, Cannabis Banking, and Electoral Reform

Missing is the SAFE Banking Act, a measure to make it easier for state-licensed marijuana businesses to actually access banks and financial services.

Some tax breaks that had been on the table are also nowhere to be found in the final bill.

The spending bill does contain the Electoral Count Reform Act—an election reform measure that Reason's Eric Boehm describes as "surprisingly logical and bipartisan." The Electoral Count Reform Act would correct for three procedural weaknesses that enabled former President Donald Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) has a new op-ed in favor of the Electoral Count Reform Act; here's how he describes it:

The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act is a bipartisan bill designed to ensure that Congress obeys state law. Unless the laws or constitution of a state identify another official to do so, the reformed Electoral Count Act designates the governor to certify the state's presidential electors to prevent different officials from sending competing slates of electors to Congress.

Additionally, the bill makes clear that the Vice President is to play a solely ministerial role in the counting of electoral votes.

The legislation also increases the threshold that would trigger a congressional debate on objections to a state's election results to one-fifth of each the House and Senate, meaning that the transfer of power would not provide an occasion for frivolous challenges.

In other words, this legislation preserves the Founders' intent that the laws and election results of the several states are respected.

Is it weird to burrow these reforms in the omnibus spending bill? Probably. But, for better or worse, that's how Congress gets a lot of things done these days.

As per usual, this year's government funding bill is full of random asides, like a proposal to ban TikTok on federal devices (not to be confused with the bill to ban TikTok entirely) and a retirement-related measure known as the Secure Act 2.0.

$$$$$pending

As far as actual spending goes, we're looking at $772.5 billion for "non-defense discretionary programs" and $858 billion for defense spending (which we discussed in the Roundup yesterday), per a Senate Appropriations Committee press release.

This includes a $44.9 billion assistance package for Ukraine and NATO allies—slightly more than the amount allotted ($40.6 billion) to help U.S. communities recovering from natural disasters.

The omnibus spending bill also contains $1.8 billion for the CHIPS Act of 2022, which Reason contributor and Mercatus Center Senior Research Fellow Veronique de Rugy calls "corporate welfare disguised as industrial policy."

And there are boatloads of cash going to cops. The bill includes $770.8 million for Byrne–Justice Assistance Grants (JAG), through which the federal government funds state and local police activities. That's $96.3 million more for JAG programs than in 2022. There's also $324 million for the COPS Hiring Program—up 32 percent over 2022 funding.

The FBI is also getting a raise. The 2023 spending bill gives the agency $11.33 billion, which is $569.6 million more than in 2022 and $524 million more than Biden requested. A summary from the House Appropriations Committee says this will help expand efforts to "investigate extremist violence and domestic terrorism." Meanwhile, U.S. attorneys are getting $2.63 billion, "an increase of $212.1 million above fiscal year 2022, including to further support prosecutions related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and domestic terrorism cases."

And don't think immigration cops or cyber cops have been left out. Immigration and Customs Enforcement will get $8.42 billion in 2023—$161.1 million more than in fiscal year 2022 and $319.4 million more than Biden requested. And the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is getting $2.9 billion, up $313.5 million from 2022 levels and $396.4 million more than Biden requested.

Of course, the omnibus bill contains funds for all the standard government programs, including $118.7 billion for veteran medical care, $47.5 billion for the National Institutes of Health, $9.2 billion for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly $12 billion for Head Start programs, $5 billion for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, and $471 million for the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

A lot of programs are getting more money in 2023. For instance, the omnibus bill allots $9.3 billion to the Transportation Security Administration, an increase of $836.1 million from fiscal year 2022 funding and hundreds of millions more than Biden requested. It includes $9.9 billion to the National Science Foundation (the "largest dollar increase for NSF of all time and the largest percentage increase for the Foundation in more than two decades," per a highlights document from the Senate Appropriations Committee), $10.135 billion to the Environmental Protection Agency (up $576 million over last year), and $154 billion to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (a $13.4 billion increase over last year).

You can find the full text of the bill—officially known as the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023—here.


FREE MINDS

Title 42 order termination on hold. The seemingly eternal battle over a public health order used to expel migrants continues. That policy, known as Title 42, was set to expire on December 21. "Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Monday put a temporary hold on the termination of [Title 42]," reports CNN. "But in a brief order Roberts signaled that the court wants to act quickly and asked the Biden administration to respond by 5 p.m. ET Tuesday to an emergency appeal filed by a group of Republican-led states."

In November, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the order. A group of Republican-led states then appealed the decision. Last Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to intervene.

More here from the Volokh Conspiracy.


FREE MARKETS

Can the FTC block technology mergers based on future market predictions?  New analysis from Reason Foundation (the nonprofit that publishes this magazine) looks at the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) attempt to stop Facebook's parent company Meta from acquiring Within, the company behind the virtual reality fitness app Supernatural. An FTC lawsuit to stop this started on December 8. "The three-week hearing is expected to test the FTC's argument that potential future concentration in the still-developing market for virtual reality fitness applications is enough to stall the merger of Meta and Within," notes Senior Policy Analyst Max Gulker. And the implications go way beyond Meta and Within:

Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Lina Khan, tapped by President Joe Biden to lead the agency last year, hopes to preside over the most significant change of course for U.S. antitrust policy in decades. She and others belonging to the New Brandeisian school of antitrust advocate a more aggressive stance toward mergers than has been seen in decades. This advocacy is making the FTC's case against Meta a case to watch as it may offer a preview of the FTC's new strategy, as well as its potential success in court.

When Facebook rebranded as Meta in Oct. 2021, the company signaled a change in its strategic outlook. Meta began investing heavily in virtual reality (VR) technology, which is expected by many to grow rapidly over the next decade. Today, Meta has already entered markets for VR hardware, social platforms, and games. As part of that strategy, Meta announced last year that it would acquire Within, developers of the VR fitness app Supernatural, for $400 million. A large tech company acquiring a niche startup in a nascent, fast-developing market is not an unusual event. Along with fitting Meta's strategy, startups like Within often consider such buyouts successful outcomes of their entrepreneurial ventures.

But the FTC says Meta should make its own fitness app, in order to "increase consumer choice, increase innovation, spur additional competition to attract the best employees, and yield other competitive benefits" while avoiding "dampening future innovation and competitive rivalry."

The FTC's theory of harm here "departs significantly from the consumer welfare standard, which Khan and fellow advocates of antitrust reform blame for a more permissive stance on mergers in the past several decades," notes Gulker. More here. (See also: "The Bipartisan Antitrust Crusade Against Big Tech."


QUICK HITS

BREAKING: Jurors have found Harvey Weinstein guilty of of rape at a Los Angeles trial in the latest moment of #MeToo reckoning.

Weinstein will now have a California prison sentence added to the more than 20 years he has left to serve in New York. https://t.co/Q3QBTXx9FA

— The Associated Press (@AP) December 19, 2022

• The FBI paid Twitter $3.4 million to cover the costs of processing its requests.

• At the Turning Point USA conference, young conservatives' talk of Trump "has centered on his legacy, rather than anticipation about his political future," says Politico.

• Seriously? "The Department of Homeland Security inadvertently tipped off the Cuban government this month that some of the immigrants the agency sought to deport to the island nation had asked the U.S. for protection from persecution or torture," reports the Los Angeles Times.

• A majority of people voting in Elon Musk's Twitter poll say he should step down as head of the company:

Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 18, 2022

 

• A new bill in California (Senate Bill 58) would decriminalize certain psychedelic drugs, including psilocybin, psilocyn, Dimethyltryptamine, mescaline (excluding peyote), and ibogaine.

• "Rikers Island has logged its 19th prisoner death in 2022 as the end of the year approaches, but a judge is still resisting efforts to turn the jail complex over to federal control," reports Reason's Scott Shackford.

• "A federal judge has blocked a California gun law that emulated a controversial Texas abortion measure — and which was intended to provoke a court fight," notes Politico.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: That Smell

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Government SpendingReason RoundupFederal governmentDefense SpendingCongressElectoral Count ActLaw enforcementMarijuanaDebtTaxpayersBudget DeficitNational DebtPoliticsBiden Administration
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (425)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The omnibus bill to fund government operations through September 2023 is out...

    More like throw taxpayers under the bus bill. Am I right people?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      But not under the back of the bus.

    2. Eeyore   2 years ago

      Cut all government employees pay by 50%. If they don't like it - learn to code.

      1. Zeb   2 years ago

        Cut 90% of government employees pay by 100%.

        1. Zeb   2 years ago

          90% is somewhat arbitrary, but decimation has good historical precedents.

          1. gihixo   2 years ago (edited)

            Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)

            HERE====)> OPEN>>  GOOGLE WORK

          2. Stuck in California   2 years ago

            Yeah, but when the Romans did it they had the other 9 men beat the 10th man to death.

            That one surviving government employee sure is going to be tired after he finishes the other nine off.

          3. Wizard4169   2 years ago

            That would be kind of the inverse of decimation, since it would involve sparing one in ten.

        2. Eeyore   2 years ago

          Works for me.

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        Soooo, that’s a no on the lamppost thing?

        1. Knutsack   2 years ago

          I hate to say it, but it's going to take some people to be removed from office, whether by democratic measures or others, to right the ship. Don't know when it will be, or even if the country is up to that, but I just don't see any other way at this point.

        2. Wizard4169   2 years ago

          Big no. That never goes anyplace good. Oddly enough, the people willing to carry out that kind of policy usually turn out to be as bad or worse than those they replace. Also, it's a lot easier to start than to stop. Are you really, really sure you won't end up decorating a lamppost yourself? You might want to ask Robespierre about that, if you have a Ouija board handy.

      3. CE   2 years ago

        Here's my plan, free of charge:
        1. Permanently lay off any federal employee deemed "non-essential" at any point in their career (such as during previous shutdowns)
        2. Cut the budget of every program by 5% from last year, to offset those programs getting automatic increases by being linked to inflation.
        3. Freeze federal employee salaries for the next 2 years to let market pay catch up to them.
        4. Authorize new hires only to replace outgoing essential personnel.
        5. Eliminate federal pensions and retirement healthcare plans for all new federal employees going forward, and switch them to 401k and HSA plans (like the rest of us have)

        Modest steps, but if they had been taken 8 years ago the budget would be balanced already.

    3. Wizard4169   2 years ago

      Well, future taxpayers, since most of this spending is going on the federal credit card.
      BTW, do you know who Mike is?

  2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    "A federal judge has blocked a California gun law that emulated a controversial Texas abortion measure — and which was intended to provoke a court fight," notes Politico.

    That because there's a constitutional right to bear arms (Second Amendment to refresh the minds of those in Rio Linda) and no such right to an abortion (one way or the other).

    1. HorseConch   2 years ago

      I've been told that since the constitution doesn't specifically ban abortion, it's a constitutional right. I'm good with that as long as it applies to everything else that the same people want to legislate.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 years ago

        Except the same leftists also demand insane restrictions on enumerated gun rights, so fuck them in the neck with a rusty shiv.

        1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

          fuck them in the neck with a rusty shiv

          Left to their own devices, the ignorant bastards always ignore proper shiv maintenance.

          1. CE   2 years ago

            Maybe we need common sense shiv regulation?

        2. Foo_dd   2 years ago

          one day, it would be nice if you guys could come up with arguments to make to those who don't believe in screwing with ANY rights.... as in those who think what gun you own and what you do with your own body are BOTH nobody else's business but your own.

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            Is a gun a unique individual with unique dna?

            1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

              so, you can't make any such argument... got it.... you can't defend the way you want to restrict rights, you can only try to pretend the rights you don't want to restrict are somehow "different."

              1. Marshal   2 years ago

                It's always amusing when the people denying rights pose as protecting rights and pretend others don't understand what is going on.

                1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                  "You want to restrict my right to restrict your rights!!!!"

                  Foo_dd, super genius sockpuppet extraordinaire.

                  1. Wizard4169   2 years ago

                    Foo_dd is easily the most sensible commenter in this thread. And yes, I do want to restrict your "right" to restrict my rights. That's pretty much part of the bedrock of libertarian philosophy.

              2. gihixo   2 years ago (edited)

                Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)

                OPEN>>  GOOGLE WORK

              3. JesseAz   2 years ago

                I will ask again. Maybe in a simpler way to will highlight the idiocy of your post.

                Does abortion involve one person or two?

                1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                  It's kind of like arguing that slavery is fine because the slave isn't legally a person under the law. The Democrats haven't changed one iota since their inception.

                  1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                    Very true.

                    I'm fine with discussion on balancing rights properly. But when they have to basically lie about facts for their argumentative base it shows the weakness of their position.

                    1. TJJ2000   2 years ago

                      Yeah; My right to life depends on restricting your *PERSONAL* rights to your body.. I'll Gun you down anytime I need a organ donor or blood donation... /s

                      Yep; That is EXACTLY what Pro-Life's pathetic position is but actually worse since my spilled DNA isn't considered a whole other person.

                      Yep; Again. That is literally how STUPID Pro-Life has gotten.

                    2. R Mac   2 years ago

                      “my spilled DNA”

                      Still haven’t had the birds and bees talk? Someone needs to smack your father.

                    3. TJJ2000   2 years ago

                      Weak.

                2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

                  One. As-if anyone without a wild imagination didn't already know that.

                  If you cannot support ?person? freedom (i.e. Fetal Ejection)
                  UR supporting Gov-Gun FORCED reproduction.

                  Doesn't matter which pronoun you want to give the fertilized egg or which DNA you want to give it. It's not another person until it is. A persons rights has to be 'inherent'.. It's not a right to someone else's body for reproduction.

                3. Foo_dd   2 years ago

                  what you asked was if a gun had DNA, dip-shit.

                  1. Sevo   2 years ago

                    Fuck off and die, pile of lefty shit.

            2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

              Uh, with your fingerprints, yes.

            3. Wizard4169   2 years ago

              A gun owner is, yes.

          2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Let me guess, you're from Rio Linda.

            1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

              let me guess, you are an idiot.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                Glad you confirmed it for me.

                NEXT!

                1. R Mac   2 years ago

                  Brutal.

                  1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

                    yeah.... i am so devastated....

                    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                      YAWN!

              2. Wizard4169   2 years ago

                At least their handle counts as truth in advertising.

          3. Zeb   2 years ago

            It's true that there are fewer people making the pro-legal-abportion argument around here these days, but I'll make that argument all day. Everyone gets to control what goes into or comes out of their own bodies and everyone gets to arm themselves for self defense or whatever other lawful purpose.

            1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

              kind of my point.... many who want to ban one point to the the other "side" wanting to ban the other..... and they pretend that is a real argument.

            2. DesigNate   2 years ago

              Tiny Ar15’s and abortions for all?

            3. JesseAz   2 years ago

              Does this include the Fetus choosing which chemicals it absorbs?

              1. Zeb   2 years ago

                If you can get it to tell you.
                You aren't going to change my mind and I'm not going to change yours, so let's just skip it, eh?

                1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

                  This is where your argument starts to fail zeb. Does this mean someone in a coma has no rights? Someone asleep?

                  Again. I'm fine with a discussion on balancing of rights. Pretending there is only one set of rights involved is showing a failing position to argue from.

                  1. Zeb   2 years ago

                    That's not what I'm saying. I was being flip and half joking. I do see it as a balance of rights. My line is that a person's right to control their own body comes out ahead of the rights of the person/being living inside. One's right to control one's own body is near absolute. That's my take on primacy of rights in that situation. I understand the objections, but I don't think anyone is being convinced to change which side they come down on through rational argument.

                  2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

                    Does this mean someone in a coma has no rights?
                    A right to take from other people's body anything they want???
                    WHY; YES! YES IT ABSOLUTELY DOES.

                    Pro-Life is exactly like leftards constantly trying to turn rights into entitlements. Rights are inherent and a pregnancies propagandized "right to life" isn't inherent therefore it's not a right.

                    1. TJJ2000   2 years ago

                      .....And it doesn't even matter if the person is in a comma or not.
                      They still don't have any right to other people's bodies.

                      A premise the Pro-Life mob is entirely trying to void.
                      Do you think you have a right to dictate other people's bodies?

                    2. Wizard4169   2 years ago

                      Please don't refer to anti-abortion extremists as "pro-life". Their utter failure (or refusal) to consider the easily foreseeable consequences of their absolutist positions proves they don't give a rat's ass about life.

                  3. Foo_dd   2 years ago

                    Zeb is right. the "right to life" of a fetus is like the left's "right to free healthcare." it is a negative right that inherently requires infringing on the rights of someone else. not just in being force to be an incubator, but in violating the woman's privacy to even know there is another life to protect.

                    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                      Ever saw a sonogram or read a medical textbook on human development? I'm guessing no because then your analogy wouldn't have been so fucking retarded.

                    2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

                      What about the SCIENCE!!! /s
                      Yet another leftard argument...
                      Pro-Life belongs on the left (manipulative dictation).

                      YOU can feel and load up on propaganda all you want...
                      YOU don't get the right to use Gov-Guns and FORCE others to reproduce.

                    3. Sevo   2 years ago

                      "Ever saw a sonogram or read a medical textbook on human development? I’m guessing no because then your analogy wouldn’t have been so fucking retarded."

                      Don't share your confidence that *any* information would cure this shit-pile's idiocy.

                    4. Wizard4169   2 years ago

                      Yes, actually, Mother's Lament. That's why I recognize so many of the anti-abortion extremists talking points as obvious bullshit.

          4. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

            The difficulty with the abortion question is that at some point it's not your body.

            Pro-life and anti-life folks always talking past each other on that.

            1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

              i do get that perspective, but up until a certain point you have to violate a woman's privacy to even know that "other body" exists. remember that most abortions happen before 20 weeks, when a pregnancy can be hidden with a loose t-shirt if the woman is showing at all. (and pretty much all after that point are medically necessary.) you have to violate her bodily autonomy to find out if you have any reason to violate her bodily autonomy.

              1. Illocust   2 years ago

                Not really. Women aren't doing abortions on their own. To kill the baby she's enlisting sometime else, so that someone else isn't violating privacy by becoming aware of it.

                1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

                  so, does that mean you are OK with abortions as long as the woman does it all by herself?

                  but seriously, thee person she is "enlisting" is someone with confidentiality agreements, and who presumably does not see the process as wrong........ it is not someone who wants to prevent her from getting an abortion and they have promised not to disclose their medical condition. those who would try to stop her still have to violate her privacy to even know there is something to stop. you can try all you want, there is no way around this. banning abortions before it is visibly obvious the woman is pregnant requires violating that woman's privacy.

                2. Wizard4169   2 years ago

                  It's not a violation of privacy if someone chooses to disclose information. If someone is forced to disclose information shared with them in confidence, that's a violation of privacy. Seriously, how hard is that to figure out?

              2. Knutsack   2 years ago

                The bodily autonomy argument would be more persuasive, if abortion activists were more vocal about actual body autonomy. Most of the time body autonomy just means abortion.

                I once saw a sign in a window that said "Body autonomy is a birthright." Sounds great, but, man, does that open up a can of worms.

                1. Foo_dd   2 years ago

                  i was against vaccine mandates too. and all drugs should be legal. to me, body autonomy does mean body autonomy..... abortion is just an area where people try to screw with that the hardest.

                  1. Knutsack   2 years ago

                    That's great about you, but that's also why I said "most". The reality is that you usually won't see major feminist or abortion groups talking about autonomy in any other context such as prostitution or drug use. Body autonomy is a catchphrase for them. It's akin to "Defund the police".

                  2. Full Of Buckminster   2 years ago

                    Should I have the right to insert a canister of Sarin gas in my rectum and then get into a crowd and pull the plug?

                    1. Full Of Buckminster   2 years ago

                      Sorry. This was meant for someone else.

                    2. Foo_dd   2 years ago

                      that might be the dumbest attempt at a comeback i have ever seen.

                    3. Foo_dd   2 years ago

                      ok

                    4. Sevo   2 years ago

                      "that might be the dumbest attempt at a comeback i have ever seen."

                      You've already beat it, shitpile.

                    5. Wizard4169   2 years ago

                      That's a deeply stupid argument, since that Sarin is going to violate others' bodily autonomy.

                2. Wizard4169   2 years ago

                  Utterly irrelevant. Just because people don't fully embrace a right doesn't make them wrong about the part they do embrace.

            2. TJJ2000   2 years ago (edited)

              I don’t…

              If you cannot support ?baby? freedom (i.e. Fetal Ejection) UR supporting Gov-Gun FORCED reproduction.

              Pro-Life could’ve allowed fetal ejection all along and just made *intentionally* ?killing? the pregnancy upon removal illegal. That didn't require a SCOTUS rule change. (violation of 4th and 13th amendments with some BS term 'potential' that doesn't exist)

              But everyone knows under the Roe v Wade deadline that that is just another imaginary fairy tale.

              Pro-Life isn’t about “not killing” anything. They are about FORCED REPRODUCTION.

          5. Azathoth!!   2 years ago

            I< think what gun you own and what you do with your own body are BOTH nobody else’s business but your own.

            And I know that the blastocyst/embryo/fetus/infant that woman and her partner caused to be inside her body ISN'T her 'own body'.

            And so do you.

            1. Zeb   2 years ago

              It's a question of whose rights come out on top. And that's basically axiomatic, so the argument is pointless.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                And here you admit it is a balancing of rights unlike above. This is where the discussion should be.

                1. Zeb   2 years ago

                  I agree, see above.

                  1. Zeb   2 years ago

                    But I'm not going to get into it today.

                    1. R Mac   2 years ago

                      TOO LATE!

            2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

              Well if you're so sure... SET IT FREE!
              FREE the other person... Not FORCE it's enslavement.

              Your 'beliefs' don't hold a chance against reality.

            3. Foo_dd   2 years ago

              the medical tests you have to do to know the results to to know there is even a blastocyst/embryo/fetus/infant there are most certainly done on her own body.

    2. Wizard4169   2 years ago

      Not to say "I told you so", but I really did warn the fetus-huggers this would happen. They insisted on opening Pandora's box anyway.

      As for abortion, at the time of the Founding, it was only considered a crime under the English Common Law after "quickening", ie after the mother could feel the child moving inside the womb. The American legal system is deeply rooted in the ECL. And the idea that a right doesn't exist or deserve protection just because it's not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution is pitifully easy to debunk. Just read the Ninth Amendment. It won't take long, since it's only one sentence.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    This includes a $44.9 billion assistance package for Ukraine...

    They do have a 2024 presidential election to start building a war chest for.

    1. Cyto   2 years ago

      Vicious

      1. Cyto   2 years ago

        Plus, having already spent far more on this war than Russia has, we send another entire year of Russian defense budget.

        That takes some effort.

        1. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

          UKR is just an unmitigated mess. I am not surprised that ENB avoids discussing this Biden era policy canker sore.

          We need to extricate ourselves from UKR pronto.

          1. R Mac   2 years ago

            How would all our rulers launder their money then?

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

              Crypto? Oh, never mind.

            2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

              Did global warming finally sink the Caribbean Islands?

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                Yes, 20 years ago. Or wait, was that 20 years from now? I can never keep track of the moving goalposts.

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        But accurate.

    2. Eeyore   2 years ago

      They can't launder a percentage of the money back to the DNC otherwise.

  4. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Taxes to support the rich.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/eu-imposes-worlds-largest-carbon-tax-scheme-inflationary-madness-sets

    An EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will be set up to equalise the price of carbon paid for EU products operating under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the one for imported goods. This will be achieved by obliging companies that import into the EU to purchase so-called CBAM certificates to pay the difference between the carbon price paid in the country of production and the price of carbon allowances in the EU ETS.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      And just like with tariffs, CBAM fees will be paid totes by the sellers.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    But in a brief order Roberts signaled that the court wants to act quickly and asked the Biden administration to respond by 5 p.m...

    Before the president starts sundowning.

    1. HollyLyons   2 years ago (edited)

      Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job.

      Open This Website.................>>> onlinecareer1

  6. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    The lockdowns were worse than you think.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/how-lockdowns-made-us-sicker

    Their names: Dan Erikson and Artin Massihi from Accelerated Urgent Care. They held a press conference in which they claimed that lockdowns would only delay but not finally control the virus. Moreover, they predicted, at the end of this, we would also be sicker than ever because of our lack of exposure to endemic pathogens.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Trust the experts

      1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 years ago

        And don't forget, follow "their" fucking science [aka Lysenkoism].

        1. RenateAdamek   2 years ago (edited)

          [ JOIN US ] I get paid more than $145 to $395 per HOUR for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $23k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
          Here’s what I do…………>>> http://Www.onlinecash1.com

    2. Ronbback   2 years ago

      this is why we have a "trippledemic" this Year. these idiots specialist with big University degrees always forget the basics. diseases don't go away if no one gets it, it hangs around till an opportune time. people need exposure, vaciness can help but for most viruses exposure is better and all that is needed

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        We also have a "tripledemic" because it's a useful thing for our overlords and the infotainment industry.

        1. Nardz   2 years ago

          ^

      2. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Replay of peanut allergies.

        1. gihixo   2 years ago (edited)

          Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)

          OPEN>>  GOOGLE WORK

      3. Foo_dd   2 years ago

        one point often lost is that there is a difference between being an expert on medical issues and being an expert on public policy.

        i remember the experts talking at the beginning of this and they were clear on two things.... one, that the goal was to slow the spread enough to keep hospitals from collapsing and, two, that most people were going to catch it eventually. the general idea was never to stop covid, it was to drag it out long enough to keep people from dying because we ran out of beds.

        and then the politicians came along.... they took the suggestions of masks and distancing and staying home IF YOU COULD, and they started to use force and mandates..... and they seemed to completely fail to understand the "we can't stop it" part. the "experts" get much more blame for what happened than they deserve. it was the politicians who took some of what the experts said and ran it all off the rails.

        1. Square = Circle   2 years ago

          the “experts” get much more blame for what happened than they deserve. it was the politicians who took some of what the experts said and ran it all off the rails.

          Very similar to "The Climate Crisis" that way.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The Electoral Count Reform Act would correct for three procedural weaknesses that enabled former President Donald Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.

    Love Trumps Hate

  8. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Does Robby tone it down for Reason?

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/12/20/big-tech-firms-are-terrified-of-upsetting-the-new-york-times/

    When billionaire Elon Musk took over Twitter, he vowed to expose its censorious practices. The so-called Twitter Files, released in several Twitter threads over the past several weeks, have revealed how the social-media firm became a weapon of political censorship. Internal documents show how major content-moderation decisions were often taken arbitrarily, with content being censored despite not breaking any rules.

    1. JasonAZ   2 years ago

      I've got Fauci on line one....

    2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      He wouldn't toe the party line, so they had ENB write that story instead, maybe?

    3. R Mac   2 years ago

      I noted this after his appearance on Kennedy last week. He was much more forceful in his condemnation there than his article published here.

      I asked if there was an edict here at Reason, which honestly wouldn’t surprise me anymore. Sigh.

    4. HorseConch   2 years ago

      He's usually significantly more libertarian when he's on Kennedy than when he writes for this fine libertarian website.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        Too bad about all the vindictive alt-right Reason comments.

    5. Illocust   2 years ago

      Interesting, I guess it would make sense. Robby had always been the free speech writer here, and the most likely to acknowledge things that other writers won't.

      Shame, I had been hoping it was the writers and not editorial control causing the problems.

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        Yeah, Robbie used to stand out here. Then not so much.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

          I've pointed out before that Reason is mostly a commentary site. It's not a journalistic endeavor. Robby's probably the main exception because he has a track record of actually digging deeper into reporting on controversial narratives, like the Rolling Stone article and the Nicholas Sandmann story, and determining if what was being reported was actually the case. The article on spiked is another good example of him going into the weeds to get the broader story.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The FBI is also getting a raise.

    THEY EARNED IT

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Came in under budget on the twitter account.

    2. Ronbback   2 years ago

      first the IRS gets there budget doubled now the FBI, who are they going after considering they never arrest any of the know terrorist until after they go on a shooting spree, which may be intentional. Our government really is scared of its own citizens, unfortunately they will use that fear against us

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        first the IRS gets there budget doubled now the FBI, who are they going after considering they never arrest any of the know terrorist until after they go on a shooting spree, which may be intentional.

        Yeah, notice how the guys who shot up the gay nightclubs in Orlando and Colorado Springs were both on the FBI's radar prior to the incidents. It's also probably not a coincidence that mass shootings by alienated white guys died down for a little while after one of them got ventilated at that mall in Indiana. A gay nightclub is definitely going to be a soft target for a glowie false flag, especially in Colorado where gun ownership is being increasingly targeted by the commie legislature.

        1. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

          "Yeah, notice how the guys who shot up the gay nightclubs in Orlando and Colorado Springs were both on the FBI’s radar prior to the incidents."

          I'm guessing the FBI has files on most of us who lean libertarian and are critical of the gov't. Being on the FBI's radar isn't a unique accomplishment.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

            Yeah, but with the Colorado Springs shooter, they immediately had people on site right after the incident happened.

            The fuckers were clearly monitoring the guy to a greater extent than having a folder in the sharedrive on him.

    3. R Mac   2 years ago

      Probably one of the top reasons they want to shove it through before Republicans take over the house.

      And which republicans are supporting it again?

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Weinstein will now have a California prison sentence added to the more than 20 years he has left to serve in New York.

    Next up: Ex-actresses who refused the casting couch sue those who didn't for stolen roles.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Which wave feminists are involved here?

    2. Eeyore   2 years ago

      They weren't forced. It was just a jab for job program. They could have chosen not to work.

      1. American Mongrel   2 years ago (edited)

        Or chosen to get a job that isn’t de facto reserved for attractive young women with loose morals.
        Interesting how few ugly Hollywood actresses are out there.
        Amazing that good looks and acting ability are so strongly correlated in females.
        We need to go back to thinking thespians are functionally equivalent to prostitutes and things will clear themselves right up.

    3. mad.casual   2 years ago

      Soon there's going to be a knock on that door and you will be called outside. In the hall there will be a man who out-ranks you. First he'll compliment you on the fine job you've done - on you making the world a safer place. That you're to receive a commendation or a promotion. And then he's going to tell you that I am to be released. You're going to protest. You'll probably threaten to resign. But in the end, I *will* be released. The reason I'll be released is the same reason you think I'll be convicted. I do rub shoulders with some of the most vile, sadistic men calling themselves leaders today. But some of those men are the enemies of your enemies. And while the biggest arms dealer in the world is your boss, the President of the United States, who ships more merchandise in a day than I do in a year, sometimes it's embarrassing to have his fingerprints on the guns. Sometimes he needs a freelancer like me to supply forces he can't be seen supplying. So, *you* call me evil, but unfortunately for you, I'm a necessary evil.

      I'm not saying Harvey is, rather than a king, more of a rook or bishop sacrificed, intentionally or not, by much larger forces. I'm just noting that, at this point, it looks like he'll serve a much longer sentence than Ghislaine Maxwell, Heidi Fleiss, and Ted Kennedy combined.

      1. American Mongrel   2 years ago

        Casting the governor's wife is a decisions I'm sure he regrets every day.
        People who chase fame are worse than politicians.

        1. Stuck in California   2 years ago

          I always thought politicians were just narcissists chasing fame, in a slightly different way.

          At least at the higher levels of politics, where the goals are more nebulous and the constituency is atomized. Large state senators, president, governors, and the like.

          You can't get there without a nearly psychopathic lack of compassion and self-awareness. Fame, riches, political office, it all comes down to power. People wanting power over others, wanting the perks it brings as others kiss their ass to get a piece of the largess. Power corrupts.

  11. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Crooked-zona update.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/arizona-judge-rules-two-kari-lakes-election-challenge-claims-can-trial

    An Arizona judge ruled that two out of 10 claims, brought by former Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, challenging Democrat Governor-elect Katie Hobbs' election victory can go to trial.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    At the Turning Point USA conference, young conservatives' talk of Trump "has centered on his legacy..."

    In the form of NFT trading cards. Get yours today.

    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

      They sold out.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

        Once again proving the adage, a fool and his money are soon parted.

        1. JesseAz   2 years ago

          It ended up just being a 100 dollar raffle from what I read. He had attached free drawings for buying the cards to win some prizes. It's a meh story to me. The cards are dumb, but ultimately it is was a raffle from what I can tell.

          1. mad.casual   2 years ago

            And, again, as long as the pyramid scheme is advertised as a pyramid scheme and no one is forced to participate, it's better than social security and not really worse than baseball cards or beanie babies.

        2. Nardz   2 years ago

          Some were resold for multiple hundreds

  13. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

    I wonder if Scott Adams is still coasting on being right for the wrong reasons about the 2016 election?

    Of course he is! If Trump decides to make his campaign about rooting out corruption in the FBI/DOJ/Intel groups he will be hard to beat no matter what else is going on.

    By Trump's own admission he already failed to "drain the swamp" the first time. Yet Dilbert thinks it's a smart strategy to ask for another 4 years to accomplish the goal he couldn't in his first 4 years.

    #MasterPersuaderLOL

    1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

      To borrow Adams' "two movies on one screen" framing, some people see Trump's 2016 victory as proof of his unusually strong persuasion skills. Others think he was just lucky to run against historically awful Hillary Clinton.

      1. Nardz   2 years ago

        Still can't explain Trump's massive vote increase in 2020 though...

        1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

          You sound like those delusional Clinton supporters who try to spin a loss into a technical victory by comparing total votes in different years. "Hillary got more votes than any white male in history!"

          Maybe Trump got more votes in 2020 than 2016 because far more people turned out in 2020 than 2016? He still lost to a dementia patient.

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            He lost to a Democrat vote machine harvesting ballots a d relying on illegal election changes.

            Do you think it mattered who the dems ran?

            1. mad.casual   2 years ago

              He lost to a Democrat vote machine harvesting ballots a d relying on illegal election changes.

              Harvesting ballots and relying on illegal election changes *while getting cover in an illegal collusion between the FBI and the MSM*.

          2. Nardz   2 years ago

            Keep that AWFL style faith in the honesty of media and government, Sandra. I'm sure your resentment gives you something.

      2. mad.casual   2 years ago

        *cough* *cough*. Go ahead, tell me he couldn't possibly fuck up enough to be liked less than any historically awful candidate in history.

        JFC, you make it sound like he looks like Clark Gable on your screen, always has, always will.

    2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Everyone deserves a second chance.

    3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

      My biggest disappointment with Trump is he didn't veto a whole lot more, force the spenders and taxers to override his vetoes. It is annoying how many Trumpistas blame Biden for signing budget busting bills, but blame Congress for the budget busting bills which Trump signed.

      I'd love to have a candidate who promised to veto every spending bill which did not include at least a 10% reduction.

      1. Nardz   2 years ago

        Trump wasn't perfect. Now we have "Biden".
        And look how much effort it took to coup Trump out of office.

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

        Not only that but he actively worked with the likes of Chuck Schumer to kill the sequester.

    4. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      Jesus, Adams has gone completely off the reservation.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Rogue indian. Where's Sheriff Schiff?

        1. American Mongrel   2 years ago

          As someone who is twice as native as Elizabeth warren, I take great offense to the word indian.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            I'm Métis so its okay. Like blacks using Nagger.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The Department of Homeland Security inadvertently tipped off the Cuban government this month that some of the immigrants the agency sought to deport to the island nation had asked the U.S. for protection from persecution or torture...

    That's what you get for having relatives turn Florida red.

    1. JasonAZ   2 years ago

      "inadvertently"

      Not a chance. Seriously, is there ANY reason to keep any of these Federal agencies? Gut them all.

  15. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    All this from a mere fraction of what El Paso, Eagle Pass, and other Texas cities have to deal with.

    https://nypost.com/2022/12/19/adams-warns-migrant-flood-will-impact-nycs-safety-and-basic-services/

    As of Sunday, more than 31,800 migrants have arrived in the city since the spring, with nearly 21,700 living in taxpayer-funded emergency shelters, according to the latest figures released by City Hall.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Virtuing is much harder than virtue signaling.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      Maybe they can do a remake of "Show Me A Hero," and bulldoze the entire city of Yonkers to make room for vibrant and diverse favelas.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    A majority of people voting in Elon Musk's Twitter poll say he should step down as head of the company...

    With this outcome it's back to people and not bots.

    1. Longtobefree   2 years ago

      The rest of the story - - - - - -

      https://babylonbee.com/news/elon-to-stay-as-twitter-ceo-after-counting-mail-in-votes

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        Thanks, Paul Harvey.

        1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

          ...Good Day! 🙂

      2. TJJ2000   2 years ago

        "It looks like we got an overnight dump of 2 million mail-in votes that all say they want me to stay in charge of Twitter! Imagine that!"
        Absolutely great..... 🙂

      3. American Mongrel   2 years ago

        Brilliant.

    2. Jerry B.   2 years ago

      Obviously, election fraud was involved.

    3. R Mac   2 years ago

      It was a trick to expose all the bots.

  17. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll.

    Brigaded!

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      I can't wait for the poll asking for new names for the app. My predicted favorite: Twitty McTwit Face.

  18. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    New Mexico or New Canada?

    https://nypost.com/2022/12/19/doctors-sue-over-having-to-offer-suicide-as-an-option-in-new-mexico/

    Now, a group of medical professionals is pushing back against the culture of death. Last week, the docs sued the state of New Mexico – which last year passed the nation’s most forceful doctor-assisted suicide law – to prevent them from being required to steer a sick patient to an early demise.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Canada (America Jr.) has always been a testbed for whatever is being planned for the US. Every crazy idea you see up north is just 5 years away from being pushed nationwide.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Rikers Island has logged its 19th prisoner death in 2022 as the end of the year approaches, but a judge is still resisting efforts to turn the jail complex over to federal control...

    Feds never get people killed.

    1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      "Who's being naive, Kay?"
      https://youtu.be/ZtL6kbYiP-w

  20. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Be careful of what you wish for, you might just get it.

    https://nypost.com/2022/12/19/criminal-referral-may-have-helped-trump-by-politicizing-the-dojs-decision/

    Yet, despite prosecuting upwards of 800 people in connection with the Capitol riot, the Justice Department hasn’t charged a single person with the federal crime of insurrection. Moreover, in connection with the most serious charges involving violence — seditious conspiracy and conspiracy to obstruct Congress — the DOJ has not even cited Trump as an unindicted co-conspirator, much less charged him.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

      The best things Dems could do for the GOP is indict Trump; the Trumpistas could rail about it like a Chihuahua straining on its leash to bark at a placid pit bull, while DeSantis, Abbot, and others get on with the real primary races.

  21. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    federal judge has blocked a California gun law that emulated a controversial Texas abortion measure — and which was intended to provoke a court fight...

    Never bring a gun to a brief fight.

  22. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    More Twitter Files and Laptop From Hell:

    https://nypost.com/2022/12/19/fbi-biden-campaign-twitter-worked-together-to-suppress-hunter-story/

    Members of the intelligence community, and censors at Twitter, stress that they just didn’t know the Hunter Biden laptop was real, so they erred on the side of caution. “It has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation,” the infamous letter from 50 former officials said.

    Now we know that was a lie.

    1. Rich   2 years ago

      they just didn’t know the Hunter Biden laptop was real, so they erred on the side of caution.

      "Nothing is real, and nothing to get hung about."

    2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Real? What is real?
      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t-Nz6us7DUA

    3. JesseAz   2 years ago

      They had the laptop for almost a year. They knew it was real.

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        The lying pile of shit ENB claims the suppression of the story was only "temporary".

    4. R Mac   2 years ago

      Nuh uh.

      — Lying Jeffy

  23. Rich   2 years ago

    Is it weird to burrow [sic] these reforms in the omnibus spending bill? Probably. But, for better or worse, that's how Congress gets a lot of things done these days.

    Congress also hands off "a lot of things" to unelected bureaucrats. 8-(

    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

      When did they switch to asking for congress to get things done?

  24. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    A return to candles for light in a supposedly first world country.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2022/12/20/1144258347/facing-an-energy-crisis-germans-stock-up-on-candles

    In addition to candles, demand for mobile heaters has surged, and Germany's utilities agency has warned against overusing them, for fear of maxing out the power grid.

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      Just add some more solar panels, duh.

  25. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1604813534214463489?t=kDVaCyjhtAqIBl04RKg_Ng&s=19

    Harvard Poll: 75% think less than a million illegals entered last year

    When told the correct number (2.75 milllion), 67% want stricter laws

    [Link]

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      We need all the fruit pickers we can get our hands on.

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        One per tree!

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        Considering all the countries shutting down their agriculture at the alter of Gaia, we might.

    2. Cyto   2 years ago

      Yet when reality happens, 100% of people adjust their beliefs to align with their preconceived beliefs and/or team fealty.

      To wit: 100% of reason writers said that Trump was crazy for claiming that his phones were tapped. They said that was impossible. When reality proved them wrong, they all switched to "of course they were tapping the phones.... they had to do it"

      When Biden bragged about getting a Ukrainian prosecutor fired using US aid to do so, reason said it was not evidence of corruption. When his son proved to have a no-work job for a Ukrainian oil company under investigation by that prosecutor, they said it was simply trading on your family name. And then when one of the business partners confirmed that they had schemes to funnel payoffs to dad... they said there was nothing to see.

      When people complained about shadow bans, they called them crazy. There is no such thing. When the social media platforms started kicking people off in coordination, they said the people deserved to go and there was no evidence of coordination.

      Then they suppressed a true story that confirmed the Biden bribery scheme. They said there was no evidence it was politically motivated and ignored the underlying story.

      Now we have the proof from inside. This was not just people who lean left agreeing with one side more often. The federal government acting outside of the control of the elected officials was operating a massive effort to plant stories at multiple news outlets and to suppress any talk about the confirmation of Bidens bribery schemes. They had a complex and multipronged scheme to control the public square in America and thereby control the election.

      And what did they say in response?

      Look! A guy in a bison hat tried to take over the country by walking around looking goofy!

      No, people will not change their view when they get the full story. They will change how they feel about the facts.

      Motivated reasoning/ cognitive dissonance is very difficult to overcome. Decisions arrived at emotionally cannot be changed with facts. This is born out in many studies.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Well said.

      2. R Mac   2 years ago (edited)

        https://brownstone.org/articles/why-im-no-longer-talking-to-people-about-the-vaccine/

        Edit: and thanks to whoever brought this publication to my attention (Nardz?)

        1. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

          "We might just as well be shooting at each other." - George O'Har

          He has a valid point.

  26. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/libertycappy/status/1605198442116321281?t=vsMKsjO8CNlJjH6NZoeBvQ&s=19

    [Meme]

  27. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    "A majority of people voting in Elon Musk's Twitter poll say he should step down as head of the company"

    The Democrats and FBI must have pulled out all the stops for that one.

    Anyway, good. Musk wouldn't have even proposed the question if he didn't have someone lined up (I suspect co-conspirator Jack Dorsey).
    Now he can get back to the monumentally important Space-X.

    1. Cyto   2 years ago

      Several people speculated that the poll was a honeypot to detect bots.

      Musk replied "interesting" to one of them which set the world to speculating that this was a hint that it was true.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        That seems plausible. I'm laughing at all the idiots who think they've "won" somehow.
        As if a CEO would just decide to have a popularity poll.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Do they think it means he’s selling Twitter, or won’t have a say in how it’s run still?

          1. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

            They might actually be that dumb.

        2. mad.casual   2 years ago

          I’m laughing at all the idiots who think they’ve “won” somehow.

          Yeah, the idea that it changes anything is funny. Taibbi and Weiss are just going to chat with the CEO and head of legal before going to print going forward rather than talking to Elon directly.

      2. JesseAz   2 years ago

        The poll stayed at 57 to 43 for 10 million votes. It was very strange.

    2. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

      There is no doubt he has a replacement set up and ready to go who they will hate even more than Elon once it gets going. Amazing how dumb these people are.

  28. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    This will almost certainly cause shortages instead of helping. Welcome back to 1973.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/12/19/eu-countries-agree-gas-price-cap-to-battle-energy-crisis

    The cap is the 27-country EU’s latest attempt to lower high gas prices that have inflated citizens’ energy bills and driven record-high inflation this year after Russia cut off most of its gas deliveries to Europe.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Why not control prices on everything? Win Win.

      1. Ronbback   2 years ago

        Seems to me that has been tried even in the U.S. under Nixon and every time it has failed

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          It’s never REALLY been tried.

        2. JasonAZ   2 years ago

          It's never been tried HARD enough. And, they didn't have the right "Top Men" last time.

        3. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

          it was tried in ancient greece for god's sake. Everyone with half a brain has knows for literally thousands of years that price controls only cause problems and solve nothing.

          1. Sevo   2 years ago

            Sevo's law:
            "Any time a third party sticks its nose in the free exchange of two agents, one or both of them lose."
            Price-fixing just makes sure this applies to *every* transaction.

          2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

            Only politicians don't have either half a brain or a sense of history.

  29. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/Sargon_of_Akkad/status/1605128422895894530?t=NPvbNe_bvrwV4kk_4-k2PQ&s=19

    Good morning, apparently this is the new hermaphrodite prostitute pride flag.

    [Link]

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

      That dumb pride flag's starting to look like a Jackson Pollack painting.

    2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Where's the bit for furries, erotic asphyxiation, car paraphiliacs and people who masturbate to anime?

    3. mad.casual   2 years ago

      Well, that flag definitely isn't a plus.

  30. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/20/auto-execs-less-confident-in-ev-adoption-amid-economic-fears-kpmg.html

    For the U.S., the median expectation for EV sales was 35% of the new vehicle market — down from 65% a year earlier and significantly lower than the Biden administration’s 50% goal by 2030 that was announced late last year.

  31. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/SenMikeLee/status/1605193880835702796?t=pnLfo86091aIRr7U1V__Wg&s=19

    This monstrous spending bill comes to 4,155 pages. We deserve proper consideration and the chance to read, debate and amend - not a backroom deal. Opposing this isn’t radical: running our government like this is what’s radical.

    1. Rich   2 years ago

      Obviously the solution is requiring the proposer(s) of any bill to read it aloud in its entirety on the floor before it can be brought to a vote.

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        Can you imagine how many pages that proposal would be?

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        That would be a hell of a way to filibuster it. Just start at page one and go.

    2. JasonAZ   2 years ago

      Come on Mike. Everybody knows you have to vote Yes in order to read the bill. Duh!

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Can't open the surprise bag without paying for it first.

    3. DesigNate   2 years ago

      Fuck Mike Lee and his anti porn crusade, but he’s not wrong here.

  32. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1605198557098971136?t=CbWA2PP5E_1xu8s5out3HQ&s=19

    Mitch McConnell is on the verge of giving the Democrats everything they want by working with Chuck Schumer to pass through a $1.7 Trillion Omnibus bill with huge increases in spending and changing the way Congress counts Presidential electoral college votes.

    R Senators vote NO!

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Cocaine Mitch, His Majesty's Loyal Opposition.

  33. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1604981030624149512?t=CUXG7eJSxMFM7NTp5rVOZA&s=19

    BREAKING: DOJ snooped on House Intelligence Committee investigators during Russia probe, subpoenas show | Just The News

    [Link]

    1. Ronbback   2 years ago

      Why not, the CIA admitted to spying on senators, without any repercusions even though that was illegal, so why wouldn't the DOJ spy on the house for any wrong think.
      I think this country is in trouble with the DOJ/FBI/CIA and our politicians are just puppets to them now, or at least the ones they can keep control of which is 95% of them.

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

      Prepare for it was trumps DoJ. Just ignore all their actions to sabotage the president. They were his guys.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

        Or they'll claim: it was different because the Senate was investigating CIA torture (a bad thing) while the House was investigating Trump (a good thing). So as long as they did for the right reason, all is good.

  34. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Brokeback Republicans and their cuckold obsession:

    “I loved to be reassured that my 9-inch very big penis was actually big. It may sound funny to you but its [sic] body dysmorphia … I know my penis is almost twice the size of an average man’s penis,” the first son wrote on July 12, 2018. The note was found in the hard drive of a laptop Biden left at a Delaware computer store in April 2019.

    https://nypost.com/2022/08/06/hunter-biden-attributes-his-penis-obsession-to-body-dysmorphia/

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      I knew it would be penis related.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "IT'S NOT ABOUT THE BRIBERY. IT'S ABOUT PENISES!!!"

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

          Cuckservatives do like to watch a big one pleasure their wives.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Better that than the kiddie diddling you do, pedo.

          2. Sevo   2 years ago

            turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
            If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
            turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

          3. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            "Cuckservatives do like to watch a big one pleasure their wives."

            "ARGUE AGAINST MY INSULT! FORGET ABOUT THE BRIBERY!!"

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Really, you're still obsessed with Hunter's penis? Face facts, Buttplug, yours will never be as desired nor wanted as his. Get over it.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Hunter's cock is considerably bigger and older than Buttplug's target range.

    3. sarcasmic   2 years ago

      I used to work with this waitress who told me about when she went through what she called her "black phase." It ended when they were gonna bump uglies and she said "You want to put that where?"

    4. Cyto   2 years ago

      Glenn Greenwald has lots to say on this topic

      https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1605203780781211648?t=4U-8-PbL3dNqDHsjBX4uwg&s=19

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        The House hearings on Hunter's Penis will be fascinating next year.

        "Speaker McCarthy, could we see the pictures of Hunter's penis again, sir? The Freedom Coalition is impressed".

        Abortion, trannies, porn bans, and Hunter Biden's Penis will be the GOP strategy to Make America Great Again.

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

          “NOOOOOO, DON’T LOOK AT THAT!!! ONLY PENISES, LOOK AT PENISES!"

        2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Glenn:
          Millions of Americans have been trained - by the media - to instantly dismiss any stories about the laptop (by lying that it's only about Hunter's sex/drug life) and to do the same to the Twitter files. All these words instantly trigger in the liberal brain: "nothing burger."

          Meanwhile, yesterday's releases from @ShellenbergerMD
          are undeniably vital no matter your ideology. They prove FBI & DHS knew the Biden reporting was coming, created a *partnership* with Big Tech, and lied to get it censored. Who isn't disturbed by this?

          https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1605214441460490240

          Look how easily media corporations lie to people to train them how to behave. They have convinced millions that the NY Post's reporting was about Hunter's sex life and drug use - an obvious irrelevancy - rather than what it was about: Joe's business pursuits in China and Ukraine:

          Bite me, Buttplug. Of course, since your residence is inside a rectum, I shouldn't be shocked when you're full of shit.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1605215214026297344

            Just look at the 2 NY Post stories Twitter *and FB* censored right before the election due to FBI/DHS lies. They were about Joe Biden's shady business dealings in China and Ukraine: obviously newsworthy. Millions of liberals have been taught to think it's about Hunter's sex life.

            1. Sevo   2 years ago

              ENB assures us the censorship was only *temporary*!

            2. DesigNate   2 years ago

              There’s a reason I call him the dumbest motherfucker to post here.

              1. Sevo   2 years ago

                He's so stupid, he assumes his obvious and constant dishonesty isn't visible to the rest of us.

          2. Marshal   2 years ago

            They have convinced millions that the NY Post’s reporting was about Hunter’s sex life and drug use – an obvious irrelevancy – rather than what it was about: Joe’s business pursuits in China and Ukraine:

            My only quibble here is that the media is not really convincing people to lie. People like Laursen, sarc, and jeffey already want to lie to protect the left. The corporate media is providing the roadmap to the best lie by testing every lie to see what fails easiest vs what fails hardest. Following this roadmap allows them to choose what to "believe". We can see this by noting how these people have supported each lie and then discarded it as the cost to their credibility overcame the value of their lies.

            1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

              The only time I "lie" is when I contradict what you say I said.

              1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                Nah, usually when you say words.

  35. n00bdragon   2 years ago

    haha money printer go brrrr

  36. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://www.outkick.com/stanford-eliminate-word-american-harmful-language-guide/

    The university recently published an index of “harmful language” it plans to eliminate from the school’s website and computer code. The ‘movement’ is called the Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative and is a”multi-year project to address harmful language in IT at Stanford.”
    .
    .
    .
    The whole initiative is asinine, but one word, in particular, stands out among the rest.

    According to Stanford University, the word ‘American’ is harmful.

    Stanford would rather the term ‘U.S. Citizen’ be used because American typically refers to “people from the United States only, thereby insinuating the U.S. is the most important country in the Americas.”

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

      Too bad, we called dibs.

    2. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

      what a bunch of fucking losers

    3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

      This is something to object to, but the author of that article is as agenda driven and foolish as the Marxists at Stanford who drafted the proposal. 'American' is not a reference to the continent, and hasn't been for over 200 years. The United States of America is the only country in the hemisphere that has 'America' in its name. It gets shortened to 'America' just like the People's Republic of China gets shortened to 'China'. Nobody in Europe or Africa says American when they referring to someone from Argentina or Canada.

      They are removing the word based on a demonstrably illogical premise. Reacting to their provably false premise allows them to make the argument about superiority and therefore plays right into their hand.

      1. mad.casual   2 years ago

        Don't read/skim the full report. 6X they recommend avoiding using the word 'black' (e.g. black hat, blacklist, black box), each time with the context, "Assigns negative connotations to the color black, racializing the term." They then go on to recommend "Black" instead of "African-American" because hyphenating is "othering".

        Further,
        Instead of: brown bag
        Consider: lunch and learn, tech talk
        Context: Historically associated with the "brown paper bag test" that certain Black sororities and fraternities used to judge skin color. Those whose skin color was darker than the brown bag
        were not allowed to join.

        Instead of: peanut gallery
        Consider: audience, hecklers or critics
        Context: This term refers to the cheapest and worst section in theaters where many Black people sat during the Vaudeville era.

        They're just shitting marginalization and racialization everywhere and pretending that it doesn't stink when they do it.

        1. Square = Circle   2 years ago

          Historically associated with the “brown paper bag test” that certain Black sororities and fraternities used to judge skin color.

          It's facially obvious to anyone who has actually had a job that this is not true.

          1. mad.casual   2 years ago

            Pure fabrication. Probably written by Henry Louis Gates Jr. or one of his sycophants directly.

            Worse still, the reasoning. Like saying black people can't be out in the sun too long or live in mountainous regions because one group of white people makes fun of other groups of white people because their necks are sunburned or they live in the hills.

  37. Roberta   2 years ago

    The linked article was unclear as to whether psychedelics would be decriminalized (made no longer a crime, but probably still a civil violation) or legalized (made no longer illegal).

    1. Rod Flash   2 years ago

      I'm curious too why they would include mescaline but leave out peyote. It seems like the unprocessed version should be favored. Maybe they just don't want people puking all over the place.

  38. Sevo   2 years ago

    "A majority of people voting in Elon Musk's Twitter poll say he should step down as head of the company..."

    The opinion of one person matters regardless of ENB's obsession.

    1. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

      Was it people who voted....or bots?

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        ENB with her finger on the "enter" key.

        1. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

          LOL....probably true.

  39. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

    The same woman who doesn't think it's a big deal for the FBI to pay Twitter $3.5 million to handle all their requests is complaining about the size of the federal budget.

    ENB, you're not getting out of that Twitter article yesterday unscathed. It reflects now on everything you write. You apologized HARD for FBI interference in private enterprises in the pursuit of censoring speech, and said there's hardly a smoking gun there. You should be ashamed to speak for libertarians.

    1. sarcasmic   2 years ago (edited)

      There are a thousand millions in a billion, and a thousand billions in a trillion.

      $3.5 million is a drop in the swimming pool.

      Edit: or to put it another way, a trillion is a million millions.

      1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

        Exactly. Just a drop. Just dropping $3.5 million here and there like it's nothing. It's JUST $3.5 million to censor speech.

        1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

          I'm just putting the numbers into perspective. You know, like math and stuff.

          1. R Mac   2 years ago

            Just?

        2. Cyto   2 years ago

          That is just one place. We have no idea what the scope of this is.... every bit of it unauthorized by congress or elected officials.

          1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

            Just one place and just one agency. Not mentioning what DHS or other intelligence apparata were paying Twitter.

            1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

              Reason approves of anything they don't mention.

              1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

                You are trying to downplay corruption.

                1. Sevo   2 years ago

                  Yeah, but it's *D* corruption, so it's good.

              2. Cyto   2 years ago

                That is a really weak take.

                It was obvious that something dangerous was happening 6 years ago. Anyone paying attention could see it happening.

                The left certainly saw it... they spent a ton of time and energy defending it, denying it existed and demanding more of it.

                But the libertarian voice maintains that there is nothing to see here.

                The Twitter files only confirm what we have known for years. Go back and look through my comments... I have been posing questions about how they manage command and control of stories across multiple platforms so seamlessly for years. People have argued that it is just a shared bias. I argued that this is not possible. The control is way too tight and the agreement is way too unanimous for that.

                I specifically mentioned the laptop story on many occasions as proof that the DNC has a strong command and control mechanism in place over almost all of the media.

                Why do I mention my own take? Because I am just some random idiot on the internet. I don't know any of these people personally. And yet I could see it plain as day. It is as obvious as a Pravda story.

                And now the Twitter files come out and it details that a DNC controlled group inside the government has been controlling the press (it details how they planted multiple stories and then cross-referenced them as proof that the story is true) and controlling social media.

                The FBI just confirmed that they are doing this across all these platforms in defending themselves.

                "No smoking gun".

                No honest person could believe this.

                Not a disinterested party, at any rate. If you see yourself as a part of that team, then cognitive dissonance might drive you to believe anything you have to believe to make it right.

                But any sane person should be able to see this for what it is. This is a continuation of a corruption that existed when Obama was in office and gave us the Russia collusion hoax. It has matured to the point where the NYT takes marching orders from security state insiders, and everyone else marches to the drumbeat as well.

                There are zero people who think Nixon was clean and pure in the Watergate scandal. The worst political scandal in US history. A scandal about breaking in to a campaign office to find out what the opposition was planning. That is what that was all about. Campaign officials sneaking into an office to look at paperwork.

                We threw them all out and prosecuted them.

                This new story has infinitely more evidence behind it than deep throat ever provided. We have a cabal of FBI and CIA insiders coordinating with the DNC using federal power to plant fake news stories and censor real news stories. They explicitly did this to interfere with an election.

                That much is an ironclad lock. It makes Watergate look like a quaint little schoolboard procedural squabble.

                And it is probably just the tip of the iceberg.

                1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                  I was just pointing out how the asshats in these comments like to put words into peoples' mouths when they don't say something, and then call them liars when what they say differs from the words that were put into their mouths.

                  It's tedious, tiresome, and dishonest. Yet the majority in these comments believe it to be the truth.

                  1. R Mac   2 years ago

                    Well thank god. The first 739 times you posted it, everyone missed it.

                2. R Mac   2 years ago (edited)

                  “But the libertarian voice maintains that there is nothing to see here.”

                  The good news is with the increase in podcasts and social media access of other libertarian voices, Reason is quickly losing it’s position as THE libertarian voice. It’s not just the commentariat criticizing their beltway liberaltarianism.

                  And their coverage of the Twitter files is exposing them to even more people.

        3. JesseAz   2 years ago

          Another stunning example of sarcs principles.

          1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

            Wow. You think math is leftist.

            1. DesigNate   2 years ago

              I don’t think that’s what he is saying.

              Maybe just try condemning the federal government paying a private business to censor on their behalf?

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Correct.

              2. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                Of course I condemn it. It's ludicrous. Although you can't convince me that it had an effect on the election. The information was out there for anyone to find. If the retards in these comments could find it then anyone could. Just not on Twatter.

                1. R Mac   2 years ago

                  If people don’t know it exists, how do they go look for it? And the people that believed it was Russian disinfo because, you know, the FBI told everyone it was?

                2. DesigNate   2 years ago

                  I can’t speak for anyone else, but it doesn’t seem like many of the commenters give a flying fuck if it would have actually changed the election. And making it about the election ignores the vast majority of the issue.

                  1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                    The majority of the commenters, correct me if I'm wrong, still believe the election was a farce and are searching for something, like the Twatter files, to prove them right.

                  2. Square = Circle   2 years ago

                    it doesn’t seem like many of the commenters give a flying fuck if it would have actually changed the election. And making it about the election ignores the vast majority of the issue.

                    ^

            2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

              $3.5 million is a drop in the swimming pool.

              Its more than a drop. More like the contents of someone's bladder.

              And that's how it always goes with Sarcasmic. Apologizing for the pool-pissers at the FBI while insisting he has no agenda. What a fucking douchebag.

              1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                Yeah. I point out that complaining about a millionth of the budget is pointless when there are bigger fish to fry, and you think I'm apologizing for the FBI.
                You guys are certifiable.

                1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

                  It's not like they paid Twitter $100k 35 times. More likely they paid Twitter $100 35,000 times. That is a tremendous number of fishing expeditions and not at all something to be dismissed as 'pointless', you disingenuous twat.

                  Trying to convince others to dismiss civil rights violations as trivial and irrelevant is right out of the Marxist playbook. You just can't resist playing the part of a gaslighting cunt for the negative attention it gets you.

                  1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                    Hey fart knocker. I was talking about math, not your emotions.

                    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

                      No, you were engaging in sophistry, marginalizing the amount of money involved by comparing it to the budget of the entire nation,
                      burying the significance of thousands upon thousands of violations of enumerated civil rights of U.S. citizens bought and paid for with that modest amount.

                      TLDR Sarcasmic: "Ergle gerble MATH... I didn't say that... I am rubber and you are glue..."

                      Dissemble, deflect, distract. Textbook Alinsky radicalism. Pathetic.

                    2. Sevo   2 years ago

                      "Dissemble, deflect, distract. Textbook Alinsky radicalism. Pathetic."

                      You really have to include stupidity here.
                      Yes, this slimy pile of lefty shit has tried every bit of dishonesty you listed and probably several more, but never assume this is a product of cupidity.
                      Asshole above, turd, mike, stupidityforever, jeffy, tony; not a one of them is possibly capable of constructing anything like a sophisticated argument to accomplish those goals; these are steaming piles of lefty shit, entirely too stupid to understand no one (other than their buds/socks) buys their bullshit.
                      NEVER assume cupidity where stupidity will suffice, especially in the case of such an abysmally stupid crowd.
                      These people are, simply. entirely too stupid to understand why they are the butt of jokes here.

      2. Ronbback   2 years ago

        I design homes and one client wanted to add a feature and I mentioned that would cost more and he said its just peanuts and i told him enough peanuts and eventually you will have a whole bag of them. 3.5 million does matter when you get enough of them and we already have a bag full of them.

        1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

          If you want to make a difference in the budget you need to go after the big items, not the tiny bits that trigger your emotions.

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 years ago (edited)

            That’s one way to look at it. Another – if you eliminate enough of the little ones now you have enough for the items you really need.

            It’s a common tactic to tame a household budget with too much debt. Cut out the daily $5 latte and bring lunch instead of buy out. at the end of the month you have an extra $300 or so dollars to work with. Use that on your smallest credit card payment. When that one is done, put it on the next one. When those are paid off add the extra to your car (bigger) or maybe the mortgage (even bigger). Before you know it, look at the cash flow you can wrangle every month and the surplus that develops. Now when you need something you have the resources to pay it.

            The government calls it a budget but they treat it like an American Express card without any limits.

            1. R Mac   2 years ago

              Keep in mind you’re talking to someone who was homeless. Using a personal finance example might not be helpful.

            2. sarcasmic   2 years ago (edited)

              A million is a millionth of a trillion

              That means saving $3 trillion from the federal budget is mathematically equivalent to saving three dollars from $3 million.

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

                Edited and still got it wrong. Sad!

        2. Square = Circle   2 years ago

          I mentioned that would cost more and he said its just peanuts

          This is public construction in a nutshell. It's true enough in its way, but when this your general attitude that you apply to everything . . . .

    2. JasonAZ   2 years ago

      "You should be ashamed to speak for libertarians."

      Well, she's not a Libertarian. ENB is a far left progressive that favors a few Libertarian ideas. Sadly, this is the case for most of Reason's Editors.

      1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

        Damn straight. Anyone who isn't a Trumpian Republican is a hardcore progressive. If they disagree with progressives they're still a progressive because being a hardcore progressive is the only possible explanation for disagreeing with Trumpian Republicans.

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          Yawn

        2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          Poor Sarc, but all he's got is a hammer.

          1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

            And a very tiny penis.

        3. R Mac   2 years ago

          TRUMP!!!!

        4. Sevo   2 years ago

          "...Anyone who isn’t a Trumpian Republican is a hardcore progressive..."

          No, you steaming pile of lefty shit, any TDS-addled asshole who supports the left regardless of the crimes is a fucking lefty ignoramus.
          Eat shit and die.

  40. Sevo   2 years ago

    "Historic biodiversity agreement reached at UN conference"
    [...]
    "Negotiators reached a historic deal to protect the world’s lands and oceans at a United Nations biodiversity conference Monday.
    The agreement includes a commitment to protect 30% of land and water considered important for biodiversity by 2030, and has been coined “30 by 30.” The percentage would be an increase on the 17% of terrestrial and 10% of marine areas currently protected.
    As part of the deal, $200 billion will be raised by 2030, along with plans to phase out or reform subsidies that could provide another $500 billion for similar causes..."
    ttps://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/19/historic-biodiversity-agreement-reached-at-un-conference.html

    They agreed to plan on something and plan on finding some money to do so. And have more meetings.
    And to 'reduce the use of pesticides', which has had such wondrous results in Sri Lanka!

    1. Ronbback   2 years ago

      these rules hurt the small nations the most who don't have 30% of their land to give up. As you stated Sri Lanka is a prime example of this and why we end up footing the bill after rich nation rules destroy the small ones. they think they are doing good but they are only making them subservient to the rich nations and i think this is on purpose and not for the good of the planet.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

        Canada on the other hand has 80% of its land uninhabited and untouched.

        Trudeau however, will still inflict something crazy on the populace.

        1. Sevo   2 years ago

          "Canada on the other hand has 80% of its land uninhabited and untouched."

          Thereby requiring Bangladesh to de-populate 30% of its land and give up pesticides!

  41. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

    Why does the government always end up with these omnibus spending bills? Because they never use regular order to work everything out. The leaders wait till the last minute and then create a large ball of crap that has to be passed, usually post-election so no one is held accountable.

    The worst part is there is no indication the next Congress will do better.

    1. Sevo   2 years ago

      Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.

    2. JasonAZ   2 years ago

      The Dems and a majority of Republicans agree. Isn't that the centrist, moderate position that you applaud?

      I ask this seriously. No sarcasm.

      1. Moderation4ever   2 years ago

        It is, but why does it take till the last minute to get to this point? Why not agree to work this out earlier and avoid the last-minute special interest that get thrown in with the required.

        1. Square = Circle   2 years ago

          Why not agree to work this out earlier and avoid the last-minute special interest that get thrown in with the required.

          I think you may have to re-examine what you think their priorities are.

  42. Sevo   2 years ago

    The science it settled!

    "California defies federal guidance, suggests all COVID patients seek Paxlovid treatment"
    [...]
    "California health officials are sounding a different tune on what people sick with COVID should do when they test positive. But their new guidance contradicts current federal recommendations, suggesting California is going its own way as coronavirus cases soar in the state.
    The state’s Public Health Officer Dr. Tomás J. Aragón raised eyebrows on Tuesday when he counseled that anybody who is symptomatic and tests positive should “seek treatment.” No such advice had been issued before.
    The complication is that the only major treatment option currently available is Pfizer’s antiviral drug Paxlovid, which according to guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is meant for people who are over 50 years old or who have significant risk factors..."
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/California-says-you-may-qualify-for-Paxlovid-now-17660062.php

    1. Ronbback   2 years ago

      I'm in California and recently had covid but refused to tell my doctor since he would have prescribed Paxlovid which clearly does not work otherwise Fauci and Biden wouldn't keep getting it. Interesting that under current California law our comments may be illegal. Now that is scary take these meds or else. THX1138 here we are

    2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Horse paste!

  43. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Conservatives weep: Markets speak:

    Renewables to Overtake Coal as World’s Top Source of Electricity, with Natural Gas to Endure, Says IEA
    ......
    IEA’s Renewables 2022 report forecasts that abundant energy drivers such as wind and solar will account for more than 90% of global electricity expansion over the next five years and, along the way, overtake coal by early 2025.
    .................
    The agency expects the world’s renewable capacity to increase by about 2,400 GW between 2022 and 2027 — equal to the “entire installed power capacity of China today.”

    https://www.naturalgasintel.com/renewables-to-overtake-coal-as-worlds-top-source-of-electricity-with-natural-gas-to-endure-says-iea/

    1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

      How much of that would happen without massive government subsidies?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        No clue. All subsidies should die, including oil and gas subsidies. The whole energy market is distorted.

        1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

          Oil and gas don't get subsidies. They get tax breaks. "Renewable energy" gets transfer payments. Don't be a Tony and equate not taking with giving.

        2. Sevo   2 years ago

          "...All subsidies should die, including oil and gas subsidies..."

          turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

      Remember when Obama was President and your favorite way to "prove" the economy was great was to gloat about Warren Buffett's net worth increases? I wonder why you haven't done that as much this year.

      Oh right. It's because with just days to go in 2022 Buffett and most of the planet's 10 richest people have lost money this year.

      It's almost as if you begin with the assumption than a Democratic White House means the economy is great, then cherry pick to support that conclusion.

      #DefendBidenAtAllCosts

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        I don't recall EVER mentioning Buffett's net worth.

        I did cite the big market gains during Obama's terms as well as his low spending record (links to Forbes/Fortune) and his cutting Bush's deficit in half.

        Obama's timing was very lucky for him. The worst economy in our lifetimes hit during his campaign.

        1. Sevo   2 years ago

          turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. DesigNate   2 years ago

          That’s because you’re a half literate moron from bumble fuck Georgia.

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 years ago

            I thought SPB was the Oracle of Dogdick, GA. Was he de-ordained?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              I always thought it was Dogshit, GA.

        3. R Mac   2 years ago

          Wow. Truly a pathological liar.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            He's almost as bad as his buddy, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. (D-King of Lies).

      2. JesseAz   2 years ago

        On the plus side welfare is way up.

        In 14 states, unemployment benefits and ACA subsidies for a family of four with two people not working amounts to an annualized equivalent of $80,000 a year in wages and benefits, the study found.
        .
        Those benefits come out to over $100,000 in three states – Washington, Massachusetts, and New Jersey.

    3. Ronbback   2 years ago

      Renewables are only overtaking coal since coal is being outlawed not because of people happily switching over. BTW there were no power outages in California before the required switch to renewables

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "Renewables are only overtaking coal since coal is being outlawed not because of people happily switching over"

        Buttplug knows but he's paid to pretend otherwise.

    4. Sevo   2 years ago

      "Conservatives weep: Markets speak:..."

      turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    5. Square = Circle   2 years ago

      IEA’s Renewables 2022 report forecasts that abundant energy drivers such as wind and solar will account for more than 90% of global electricity expansion over the next five years and, along the way, overtake coal by early 2025.

      This time it's going to be true, I can feel it.

  44. Jerryskids   2 years ago

    Why Does Funding Government Take $1.7 Trillion and 4,000 Pages?

    10% for the Big Guy. Problem is, in Congress there are dozens of Big Guys.

    The question you should be asking is why Mitch McConnell and his buddies are so eager for the lame-duck Democrat-controlled Congress to lock up funding for the next year rather than wait a couple of weeks for the new Republican-controlled Congress to be seated and have the GOP control budgeting. If you didn't know better, you might think Mitch was working for the Democrats. Or covering for RINO Republicans who are indistinguishable from Democrats.

    1. DesigNate   2 years ago

      But it was totally Trump that tanked all those Republican races. Definitely not cocaine Mitch refusing to find anyone who didn’t pledge allegiance to him.

      1. American Mongrel   2 years ago

        I'm sold. Only maga candidates from now on. Will Jesse or Nardz be sending me my 50 cents?

    2. American Mongrel   2 years ago

      This is totally the winning strategy for republicans. Let's keep up the berating... surely I won't stay home for the next election when the next kleefisch is accused of sacrificing fetuses to mao's ghost.

  45. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/THR/status/1605201417869869056?t=RXehZa-dP-0rClNoUyqFnw&s=19

    John Oliver, Amy Schumer and More Sign Writers Guild DEI Pledge for Late Night and Comedy/Variety TV Writers

    [Link]

    1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

      We need more variety of people who think exactly like we do.

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        They're experiencing a shortage of Trump jokes!

    2. sarcasmic   2 years ago

      Retarded retards are retarded.

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        Is sarc developing insight!?!

    3. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

      That'll fix those ratings!

    4. Square = Circle   2 years ago

      Does this mean over-privileged white people like John Oliver and Amy Schumer are going to step aside in the name of Diversity?

  46. R Mac   2 years ago

    Appears the DOJ was spying on Congress, because Congress was investigating their wrongdoing. Lefty Jeffy smiles.

    “Harvard University law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz told Just the News that while more information needs to be learned the subpoenas raised serious concerns about the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch.

    "It's a violation of the separation of powers," said the renowned constitutional law scholar. "Look, our Framers specifically separated legislative, executive and judicial powers. And that was saying ... that Congress is independent and has the right to investigate, and the Justice Department shouldn't be investigating the investigators unless there is fairly substantial proof of criminal conduct. So we don't know the whole story yet, but I'm very suspicious of subpoenas being issued by the grand jury."”

    https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/nunes-accuses-doj-seeking-blackmail-material-during

  47. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

    "As far as actual spending goes, we're looking at $772.5 billion for "non-defense discretionary programs" and $858 billion for defense spending"

    And given the $1.2 trillion deficit projection for 2023, we are putting almost all of this on the national credit card. But why worry, right?

    1. DesigNate   2 years ago

      Spoiler alert, they will spend at least twice that amount.

  48. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1605213887694966784?t=jTT-ov0BO3rqSAM2gc6PKA&s=19

    Operational preparation of the environment for a "culture of anti-LGBTQ hate."

    [Link]

  49. Naime Bond   2 years ago

    It would have been more than 4000 pages but they contracted with the AZ firm that ran the printers in their mid term elections to print it, and they ran out of ink.

    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

      Only on the GOP authored pages.

    2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      Ooh, tied AZ election in with budget. Really had to stretch on that one, inventing a contracting company that was never in the AZ election scenario.

  50. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

    "Can the FTC block technology mergers based on future market predictions?"

    Why not? Modern governance, especially from progressives, is based on fantasy problems AND fantasy solutions. Remember, in the post-modern world nothing is knowable, and everything is based on feelings.

  51. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    Why Does Funding Government Take $1.7 Trillion and 4,000 Pages?

    It doesn't.

  52. Nardz   2 years ago

    I'm concerned that most of you don't realize just how bad the situation for us is, even in light of recent confirmation.

  53. Nardz   2 years ago

    Remember when Watergate was a big deal?

    Compare what was done then vs what is done now...

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Watergate was a shitty third-rate cover up of a crappy second-rate burglary. This is indeed much bigger.

    2. JasonAZ   2 years ago

      This is an atom bomb compared to a fire cracker. Yet, the MSM and progressives are yawning or simply ignoring it.

      Surprisingly, the GOP isn't making a lot of noise. Right now, that is very interesting. How many GOP folks like McCain and Romney will we find behind some of these shenanigans?

      1. DesigNate   2 years ago

        It’s not that surprising. The ones that do make noise say stupid shit about Jewish space lasers.

      2. Nardz   2 years ago

        It's the stuff of required revolution

  54. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    BREAKING: Jurors have found Harvey Weinstein guilty of of rape at a Los Angeles trial in the latest moment of #MeToo reckoning.

    What a travesty. Can you imagine being sentenced to 20 years on this flimsy evidence? It's crazy. It's a total show trial.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      To be frank, I'll play the world's smallest violin for Weinstein. He's a creep, and a big Democrat donor to boot. Odd how those two seem to go hand in hand.

      1. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

        True but that's the point of beyond a reasonable doubt. Even and unlikeable creep isn't guilty until you can truly prove. The allegations were not even close to 'proven' in court. The jury just didn't like him.

    2. Zeb   2 years ago

      That's a problem (which can go both ways) with a lot of trials for non-violent rapes, I'd say. If there is no physical or recorded evidence of force or compulsion, it's down to one person's word over another. Which seems to me is pretty much always a situation where there is reasonable doubt. That sucks for people who were legitimately victimized, but the reasonable doubt standard is too important a legal principle to mess with.

      1. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

        ^ this is absolutely correct. The reasonable doubt standard is one of the most important things we have. And it's already on its death bed. The system is set up to make sure you get found guilty at trial. It's a collusion between judges, prosecutors, cops and DAs. You have almost no chance in a trial even if you are completely innocent.

      2. DesigNate   2 years ago

        It seems plainly obvious that the legal system (and Democrats in general) are actively working against this bedrock principle.

  55. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/YossiGestetner/status/1605187559822442496?t=pZIkif-uC6d0u-yxNN9eMA&s=19

    1/3 Dems know that if less than 22K votes spread in 3 states went the other way, Trump would have won 2020 despite COVID, despite Media Bias; Despite Tech Censorship, Despite Interference by the IC, and despite Never Trump saboteurs who made it fashionable for GOPs to help Biden.

    2/3 This is why Dems, their media and GOP collaborators are trying to take Trump out by unprecedented-in-the-US fascist moves of subpoenas, raids, referrals for prosecution and actual prosecution of a political opponent.

    They can't risk a rematch of 2020.

    It was too close!

    3/3 Those same people have successfully gaslit many rank and file in the GOP and Con movement to think that Trump is the cause of electoral problems for the GOP.

    May GOPs move on from Trump? Sure, but doing so as a product of the above narrative is an act of useful idiocy.

    1. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

      This is also why if the GOP gets their ground game in order, it's going to be DeSantis painting the electoral college red. I think it's going to be a major landslide.

  56. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>A majority of people voting in Elon Musk's Twitter poll say he should step down as head of the company:

    everyone was agog yesterday where were you?

  57. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    "A federal judge has blocked a California gun law that emulated a controversial Texas abortion measure — and which was intended to provoke a court fight," notes Politico.

    Judge Benitez is fantastic.

  58. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/yuanyi_z/status/1605181399904014337?t=o2PsXp4nLUXVpg5cZt4Gfw&s=19

    Euthanasia activity book for children, financed by Health Canada.

    [Link]

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Can't implement Agenda 2030 without normalizing state killing.

      This is exactly what the Nazi's did with Aktion T4. It started as mercy killing the terminally ill but quickly expanded to include the aged and mentally ill, and then even just people who were stressed or had mild disabilities and unwanted children

      Eventually the techniques developed by Aktion T4 were used in the holocaust.

      And never forget, America Jr. is usually the testbed for what they're planning to institute nationwide in the US.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      The person having MAiD will get three different medicines. They are usually given in an IV. IV stands for “intra-venous” and means “in the vein.” A very small needle is used to place a small plastic straw that goes into a person’s vein. Then the needle is taken out and the straw can be used to send medicine straight into a person’s body in their blood.

      The three medicines work like this:

      1. The first medicine makes the person feel very relaxed and fall asleep. They may yawn or snore or mumble.

      2. The second medicine causes a “coma.” A coma looks like sleep but is much deeper than regular sleep. The person will not wake up or be bothered by noise or touch.

      3. The third medicine makes the person’s lungs stop breathing and then their heart stops beating. Because of the coma, the person does not notice this happening and it does not hurt. When their heart and lungs stop working, their body dies. It will not start working again. This often happens in just a few minutes, but sometimes (rarely) it can take hours.

      There is no humane, painless way to perform the death penalty.

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      Um...

      “Could I change their mind?”

      As much as other people may want to change their mind, the person who is choosing MAiD probably wishes just as strongly that they could change their illness or condition and how it is affecting their life. When someone decides to ask for MAiD, it is usually after thinking very carefully and having very hard feelings for a long time. They may feel that nothing will change their mind
      because there is nothing that can help their body or their suffering get better.

      Once chosen, MAID is the only path. Don't try.

  59. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    The FBI paid Twitter $3.4 million to cover the costs of processing its requests.

    Nothing to see here. Just a big nothingburger. You're all just obsessed with Hunter Bidens nude shots. Ask any jOuRnOliEst!

    /sarc

    1. MasterThief   2 years ago

      I'd really like to know how many of these "requests" were placed and what justified that price point for them. In the broad scheme of things, it isn't that much money for the players involved, but it is also a lot of money for explicitly removing speech. We need names and prison sentences for 1st amendment violations.

  60. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1605222340379308032?t=WKN-TIwupKNesK9FFdiuIg&s=19

    The Nuremberg trials were a scapegoating/human sacrifice ritual to inaugurate a new social order. As Girard says, the initial sacrifice must be reenacted periodically to maintain its force. This woman was age 8 in 1933, 14 when WW2 started. She was a *typist*. This is obscene.

    [Link]

    1. Illocust   2 years ago

      Yeah, this case is fucked up. At least she got to live a full life before someone decided to destroy it.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        You do know that there are no statutes of limitations on murder, right?

        And you do know that according to Judge Heywood in the Nuremberg Trials, murder was illegal even under German Law at the time of the Nazis, right?

        What's "fucked up" is man's inhumanity to man.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      I haven't read all the details on this but I have mixed feelings. I never thought of the "nazi hunters" as going after the guy who stocked the Fridge at Auschwitz. This seems to be going a little far afield from the Commandant or Guards that ran the camp.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

        On the other hand, maybe in 50 years this might provide a nice precedent to try and execute that neighbor who screamed at you for not wearing a mask. So I admit I'm torn.

        1. Sevo   2 years ago

          My sarc meter is calibrated and certified.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago (edited)

      So she was 18 when the War and the Holocaust ended. And juveniles have been tried as adults for single murders. What’s the story here? If she did it, she did it.

      Of course, this Tweet is coming from a Dugin Hooligan Putin apologist, so what else is new?

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        Perhaps Soros should be extradited?

  61. HollyLyons   2 years ago (edited)

    Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job.

    Open This Website.................>>> onlinecareer1

  62. MWAocdoc   2 years ago

    Concerning Benitez striking down the California gun law intended to trigger Supreme Court review of the Texas abortion law, I have no doubt that both laws are unconstitutional. But to say that the gun law is an exact replica of the abortion law is just plain silly. Creating a cause of action for someone to sue who was not personally harmed by the action has always been questionable, but unlike abortion, there is an enumerated right to keep and bear arms and suing the manufacturer of a firearm used in a crime is just as silly as suing Ford for manufacturing a car used in car accident. If you personally were harmed during an abortion you have the right to sue the surgeon. If you personally were harmed by a defective gun, you have a right to sue the manufacturer. Everything else is simply flagrant culture war bullshit.

  63. Cyto   2 years ago

    How far have we moved from the rule of law?

    Remember when AL Gore ran for president? He got into a bit of hot water over the use of government resources for campaign fundraising. He made fundraising calls from a Whitehouse office phone. Using government resources for campaign purposes is illegal. He didn't ultimately get in any real trouble, but that is where the line was.

    Where are we now?

    Well, we have 80 FBI agents monitoring and controlling social media for the DNC, and apparently they also have a big enough budget to have paid Twitter over 3 million bucks to suppress the stories they wanted suppressed. That is 3 million federal tax dollars.

    Even if every bit of all of it was voluntary by the companies, it would be illegal on both ends. But it wasn't, as twitters own deliberations show.

    Remember... phone calls were enough to trigger official corruption probes not too long ago. Obama normalized using the IRS and the FBI to attack political enemies.... and now where are we?

    Even one of these FBI emails is enough to trigger a massive investigation and criminal prosecutions. And we have a years long program that covers probably dozens of outlets.

    But the ball is in our court. They got away with it under Obama. They also got away with it under Trump.... which made them so brazen that they are now just openly wiping their ass with US election law and the constitution. If we do nothing, we shall reap what they have sown. Hard, and forever.

    1. Gus Valgus   2 years ago

      3 million is only a drop in the bucket of the federal budget. Stop whining.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        It's not the amount; it's the principle. Even if $1 is spent to suppress a story or a tweet, it's still a problem.

      2. DesigNate   2 years ago

        Congratulations, you regurgitated a talking point.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

          I'm assuming that was a comic troll comment. Like if we only spent $3 million on firing squads for the vaccine hesitant, that would be nothing to whine about.

          1. DesigNate   2 years ago

            50/50 on Poe’s law for any given post these days

      3. Sevo   2 years ago

        One brain cell is all you got.
        Fuck off and die, TDS-addled shit pile.

    2. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

      How far have we moved from the rule of law?

      Again, Reason is thematically complicit in this because to them, Congress granting protection to ‘Good Samaritans’ for blocking and screening offensive material is how free speech is secured.

      Nevermind that Lieberman was pulling this exact stunt, on a smaller scale, in 2010.

  64. CE   2 years ago

    1.7 trillion? That will fund the government for about 3.5 months.

  65. CE   2 years ago

    ...the reformed Electoral Count Act designates the governor to certify the state's presidential electors to prevent different officials from sending competing slates of electors...

    Except the Constitution vests that power in each state's legislature, not the governor. There already shouldn't be any competing slates of electors from different state officials who have no say in the matter.

  66. mad.casual   2 years ago

    Why Does Funding Government Take $1.7 Trillion and 4,000 Pages?

    Because some people think Congress providing protection for the 'Good Samaritan' blocking and screening of offensive material is essential to liberty. That's why the FBI paid Twitter $3.4M for their blocking and screening services.

    Your pet cause isn't special. Fuck you, cut spending.

  67. gordo53   2 years ago

    It takes 4000 pages because all big appropriation bills are basically racketeering. Congresspeople conspire with moneyed interests to subvert the democratic process. It's been going on longer than this country has been in existence. But until the public begins to figure it out and lift their voices, it will continue.

  68. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    The FBI is also getting a raise. The 2023 spending bill gives the agency $11.33 billion, which is $569.6 million more than in 2022 and $524 million more than Biden requested.

    People have no idea how much the 2016 Trump campaign investigations, the subsequent Trump/Russia investigation for the following four years, the January 6 investigations and monies sent to Twitter for *checks notes* misinformation mitigation operations drained the FBI budgets.

    1. Sevo   2 years ago

      Effective propaganda ain't cheap.

  69. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

    Here's an entire nation trying to do a "Sovereign Citizen" stunt:

    Turkey changes its name after tiring of people getting it confused with the bird
    https://www.indy100.com/news/turkey-name-change-confusion-bird

    Of course, changing the name to Tūrkiye won't change Erdogan's aspirations for a new Islamic Caliphate or bring the dead Armenians under The Ottoman Empire back to life.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      400 years of... Oh wait, the Ottoman empire? *checks notes* Over 600 years!

      1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago (edited)

        The Armenian Genocide took place in just two years, 1915-1917, though Armenians lived as second-class D’himmi under the Sha’ria law of the Islamic Ottoman Empire since 1453. So your date’s about right.

        The Armenian Genocide was also an inspiration to Adolf Hitler because it showed to him that it was possible to exterminate whole groups of people.

        On the eve of the invasion of Poland in September 1, 1939, he infamously said: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?”

        Awaiting Misek to nibble on this bit of Turkish Delight bait.
        🙂

    2. NOYB2   2 years ago

      The bird is named after the country.

      And Turkey doesn't get to dictate what other countries call it.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        Very true. And good to see that Subsidiarity isn't everything to you. 🙂

  70. Sevo   2 years ago

    Do not know which freedom-promoting legal teams all of you contribute to, nor how much you contribute, but if you represent a significant contribution, now's the time to drop them an email and ask regarding their response or their planned response.
    We need ACTION!

  71. Liberty Lover   2 years ago

    Pork, payoffs, slush funds and kickbacks. Or in one word, Corruption.

  72. Tommy Estrada   2 years ago (edited)

    I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
    🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
    HERE====)> https://ukincome6.blogspot.com/

  73. Tommy Estrada   2 years ago (edited)

    I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..

    HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM

  74. Johnathan Galt   2 years ago

    Why?

    Trillion$ of rea$on$.

  75. JimCherry   2 years ago

    "$772.5 billion for "non-defense discretionary programs", most of which are unconstitutional/extraconstitutional 'good ideas from Congress' which could never pass a real court challenge.

  76. AngelaMcbride   2 years ago (edited)

    Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
    🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

    HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM

  77. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    the feds actually DO run socks online and they've not just admitted it but bragged about it.

    I dont see why they wouldnt be running a couple socks here on a libertarian leaning message board. We're they're exact targets.

  78. American Mongrel   2 years ago

    No idea what was said, but there are undoubtedly right shills posting here too. And anyone who's read about these intelligence tactics knows who they are.
    Mute the left and right shills here and it's an awfully quiet place.

  79. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Our fifty-centers are too fucking dumb to be feds. Most likely they're from a few different outfits like Media Matters who've been running fifty-centers for twenty years.

  80. American Mongrel   2 years ago

    They're cheap and devoted to their particular causes.

  81. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Sarc isn't paid. He just has a need to befriend people online and will sell out his principles to do so. He needs attaboys from the leftists here.

  82. sarcasmic   2 years ago

    *snort*

    Talk about projection. You're the king of affirmation in these comments.

  83. avelidely26   2 years ago (edited)

    Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,500 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,500 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
    .
    .
    Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com

  84. gohek91701@areosur.com   2 years ago (edited)

    I’m currently generating over $35,100 a month thanks to one small internet job, therefore I really like your work! I am aware that with a beginning cdx05 capital of $28,800, you are cdx02 presently making a sizeable quantity of money online.

    Just Check ———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!