Georgia Secretary of State: Democrats 'Double Down on False Claims' About Elections
Brad Raffensperger compares President Joe Biden and Sen. Raphael Warnock to Donald Trump.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger held the line against former President Donald Trump's exhortations and veiled threats to "find" extra votes that would win Trump the state in the 2020 presidential election. Now, Raffensperger is claiming that election denial is a bipartisan problem.
In a Sunday op-ed for The Wall Street Journal entitled "Raphael Warnock, Election Denier," Raffensperger castigated the newly reelected Democratic senator and others for statements that cast doubt on the fairness of the state's recent elections.
In 2018, when Democrat Stacey Abrams lost the race for governor by less than two points, she responded by casting doubt on the entire system, delivering a nonconcession concession speech in which she "acknowledge[d] that former Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified as the victor" but said that in his role in that prior office, "eight years of systemic disenfranchisement, disinvestment and incompetence had its desired effect on the electoral process in Georgia." She said that "I cannot concede" because the election was not "right, true, or proper." She also announced the formation of a nonprofit organization, Fair Fight Action, which days later sued the state alleging voter suppression.
But in 2020, Democrats recaptured both the Senate and the White House. In testimony before the U.S. House in early 2021, Abrams acknowledged that the 2020 elections had been "audited, evaluated, and investigated," and found to feature "no evidence of widespread fraud." As Raffensperger pointed out in his op-ed, the judge who would later rule against Fair Fight Action's lawsuit summed up the argument as "When you lost, it wasn't a free election, but when you won, it was a free election."
"Just because people endured long lines," Warnock said in his victory speech this year, and "the rain and the cold and all kinds of tricks in order to vote, doesn't mean that voter suppression does not exist." Raffensperger singled out this rhetoric, saying it is of a piece with President Joe Biden's criticism of Georgia's 2021 voter law as "Jim Crow 2.0." In contrast, Raffensperger took a victory lap by touting how smoothly his state's midterms ran and how turnout hit record numbers in each of the last three cycles. He bragged that "Georgia voters saw lines shorter than 10 minutes on average across the state on Nov. 8."
But the secretary ignored this month's runoff election, which did see long lines in a number of polling locations. Raffensperger even seemed to acknowledge the issue last week when he told The New York Times that he would be asking the state legislature to open more early voting locations in the future.
Responding to Raffensperger's charge Monday on CBS Mornings, Warnock said, "The fact that people have had to overcome barriers doesn't mean those barriers don't exist."
Raffensperger's defense does paper over some very real issues: He claimed that the 2021 law "add[ed] absentee-ballot drop boxes to the Georgia Code for the first time." However, in doing so, it set a limit on the number of drop boxes a county is allowed to have, far lower than what most of the state's larger and more densely populated counties had previously used.
But in general, Raffensperger does have a point. While election denial is more visible among Republicans, Democrats are not immune to criticism on the subject either.
This is not to say that the sides are equivalent: When Stacey Abrams gave her nonconcession speech, she held no political power, whereas Trump pressured state officials and made his "rigged election" pronouncements as the sitting president. But the sentiment is harmful no matter who wields it. Raffensperger wrote that claims of fraud "would be laughable if they weren't so dangerous to public trust in elections." Indeed, no matter which side is sowing doubt, trust in the integrity of the electoral process is bound to be undermined.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
Double possum fuck Joe Biden.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.onlinecash1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I’m currently generating over $35,100 a month thanks to one small internet job, therefore I really like your work! I am aware that with a beginning cdx05 capital of $28,800, you are cdx02 presently making a sizeable quantity of money online.
Just Check ———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1605292454261182464?t=X07CRIFFbKnBwT-qw6Vyqg&s=19
1. TWITTER FILES PART 8
*How Twitter Quietly Aided the Pentagon’s Covert Online PsyOp Campaign*
Despite promises to shut down covert state-run propaganda networks, Twitter docs show that the social media giant directly assisted the U.S. military’s influence operations.
[Thread]
You here; me in the YIMBY thread, LOL!
This is exactly what a libertarian publication (that shall now go nameless to protect the stupid) should be thoroughly outraged about. I know I damn well am.
Come on guys, it’s really not a big deal.
— Lying Jeffy
"it set a limit on the number of drop boxes a county is allowed to have, far lower than what most of the state's larger and more densely populated counties had previously used."
Bullshit. Before the COVID hysteria there were NO drop boxes.
And it was done in a completely arbitrary and extralegal manner. It's a stretch, legally, for drop boxes to exist at all.
Or an alternative way to look at it:
Prior to, during, and after COVID the number of drop boxes was equal to or greater the number of mailboxes in the county.
Drop boxes are a special accommodation for a few dozen election conspiracy theorists who believe the post office will steal their ballot. One drop box for a few dozen conspiracy theorists per county is plenty.
Doesn't the USPS attach a "drop box" to nearly every residence in the country?
How did any State level regulation eliminate a significant number of those?
Who was behind Jim Crow? Democrats.
Who was behind segregation? Democrats.
Who was behind the Black Codes? Democrats.
Who was behind the KKK? Democrats.
Who was behind slavery? Democrats.
Who was behind the Trail of Tears? Democrats.
Over two centuries of vote fraud, suppression and intimidation and we're gonna act like they have ANY legitimate points?
Fuck that.
Great point. The people in that party today are the exact same people who were running it fifty, hundred, even a century and a half ago. Exact same people with the exact same attitudes. Policies don't change, people don't change, and nothing evolves. Nothing has changed at all.
The people in that party today are the exact same people who were running it fifty, hundred, even a century and a half ago.
Come on, now. They're not all as old as Biden.
Is this a really dumb attempt at the leftist talking point about the parties switching? A common leftist narrative to excuse their past actions?
One that ignores that even today democrats are arguing for race at the forefront of all policies including asking for segregation?
Why do you claim to not be a leftist when you push all their narratives?
Is this a really dumb attempt at the leftist talking point about the parties switching?
No.
A common leftist narrative to excuse their past actions?
Nope.
One that ignores that even today democrats are arguing for race at the forefront of all policies including asking for segregation?
Ah yes. You bring up something someone never talked about and claim they support (or oppose depending on what is convenient) because that's what you say silence means. *yawn*
Why do you claim to not be a leftist when you push all their narratives?
Why do you accuse me of things I don’t do while ignoring what I say?
The Democrats no longer outright hate black people, they just patronize them as people incapable of having any agency or responsibility.
Same with women.
Yeah, trying to tie people to the evils of the past is a dumb game. There is plenty to criticize Democrats (and everyone) for that doesn't require attaching historical guilt based on what their organization did generations ago.
Exactly.
Except that there are constant, and direct implications by the media and education establishments that those policies came from the right.
Occasionally, the truth needs to be told.
This. Go ask an average 20 something which party did all those things and see what they tell you.
Their attitudes and policies are the same as they’ve always been: power and control.
Are you seriously trying to argue that todays Democrats are any different than FDR’s Democrats? I genuinely find that hard to believe.
Always focused around race. If they can't enslave them legally, they generate hate and dependency to control them.
Valuing power and control is hardly a unique feature of the Democrats among political parties/movements. The establishment Republicans are no different when it comes to maintaining power and control through the post-war "liberal order". They are all part of the same club.
I think the point is valid. Judge people on what they are actually doing now, not on tenuous historical associations.
Well based on what they are doing today, I’d say establishment Republicans would actually prefer Democrats be in power so they can fund raise off of being out of power.
See: Lindsey Graham proposing a dead-end abortion bill right before the midterms, and just about everthing Mitch McConnell does.
Tell me you don't know anything about US political history without telling me you don't know anything about US political history.
Tell us you have superior knowledge of American political history without telling us any of that superior knowledge of American political history.
Huh. I expected more from “windycityattorney”. Maybe ask him again when he shows back up next month.
What was it LBJ had to say about the black vote in the south? He was a Republican if I remember correctly.
Thanks for telling us you know nothing of US history, political or otherwise.
Who erected Confederate statues? Democrats
Who NOW wants to keep them? Republicans
Which party does the KKK NOW support? Republicans
Which party is on record attempting suppression of black votes NOW? Republican
Which party is attractive to racists who think that they can deflect accusations of racism by talking about what the other party did three or more generations ago? Republican
Fuck off.
>>Which party does the KKK NOW support? Republicans
questionable.
Majority of the KKK now is FBI, and they didn't try to hide much who they supported
Which party is on record attempting suppression of black votes NOW? Republican
What record?
Some of the quotes here, for example.https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/when-politicians-tell-truth-voting-restrictions
But don’t pretend you don’t know – though I know that you people have just enough understanding to know that you don’t actually want to admit openly that you approve of voter suppression "in a righteous cause".
The link you provided shows example after example of GOPers saying voter ID prevents voter fraud. This snip affirms the hypothesis.
"Heritage Foundation president and former U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) said in an April 2016 radio interview, “[Voter ID laws are] something we’re working on all over the country, because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates.”
Nothing about black voters but says volumes about democrat fraud.
Says volumes about SRG’s bigotry…
Ahh. The unbiased Brennan center. Your racism is showing. 2/3rds of blacks support election reform.
Kkk endorsed Hillary shrike...
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president
Keeping ones past isn't keeping ones racism. Destruction of the past is an authoritarian tool. No wonder you support it shrike. And please explain how Columbus and Lincoln are confederates. This should be amusing. Also Thomas Jefferson, Washington, etc. You really are a retarded leftist shrike.
Whose votes are being suppressed? How? Or are you so racist against blacks you think they are too dumb to follow simple rules?
What an hilarious post shrike.
Now, Raffensperger is claiming that election denial is a bipartisan problem.
Will you look at that. TDS just turned a good Republican into a BOAF SIDEZ hardcore leftist. Because only hardcore leftists say BOAF SIDEZ.
"Just because people endured long lines," Warnock said in his victory speech this year, and "the rain and the cold and all kinds of tricks in order to vote, doesn't mean that voter suppression does not exist."
"...Warnock said, "The fact that people have had to overcome barriers doesn't mean those barriers don't exist."
Can anyone translate this palaver?
Weather is racist.
The fact that she can't speak English is not evidence that she can't speak English.
Imagine making this argument when we have:
- Early voting for weeks, sometimes an entire MONTH before election
- Automatic registration when getting ID at DMV in some states
- Multiple poling places
- Mail in ballots that a DNC operative will mail to you or drop off at your door (if you happen to live in the right area and are a sure dem vote), and you either have to just put it back in the mail box or they will come and drop it off for you
Even just the early voting is enough to take away any and all excuses for why voting is just too hard. The "its too hard for blacks to vote" excuse is bordering on severe racism
Actually yes, people overcoming perceived barriers without much problem is evidence that those barriers are not really a problem.
Yes, because i understand English. Apparently you don't.
New troll on the block. And an asshole, too.
Shrike sock.
those Black Panthers were helping old white ladies vote.
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job.
Open This Website……………..>>> onlinecareer1
Sorry, Warnock, but the entire Federal government and bureaucracy represent hurdles that everyone in America has to overcome in order to do anything at all productive. You call them regulations to protect people and you’re all in favor of hurdles that people you don’t like have to overcome, so spare us the crocodile tears. The allegations of systematic racism are wearing a little thin at this point in your narrative. Almost all of the systematic racism left in America is maintained in big city police departments, mostly under the control of Democrat politicians, so remove the log in your own eye before you complain about the mote in the eye of your opponents.
Yes, there are sometimes barriers to voting. You know what's a great big barrier? Knowing who to vote for, knowing what your personal convictions are and knowing who is running, and knowing what matters. You might not be able to avoid seeing ads for the people running for president, but how many people don't even know who their mayor, sheriff, or police commissioner is? Who represents you on the city council? On the county commission? Who is your state rep?
You can cry me a river over the fact that voting may actually require you to make an effort and spend some time doing it.
"...voting may actually require you to make an effort and spend some time doing it."
Not if you're a Democrat. For them, the ballot should fall out of the sky into your hands, be pre selected, and then fly away to the nearest collection box. Anything else is just suppression.
It's amazing the pretzels Reason will twist itself into to attack Trump. You shmucks still haven't learned your lesson 6 years later. Warnock is right, as much as I hate to admit it. Millions of people voting is not an argument against voter suppression. We should make it easier to vote. Making it past barriers is not evidence that barriers don't exist. Some barriers are understandable, others might not be, but those should be evaluated on their individual merits and not the number of votes cast.
Look at what happened in Arizona. Thousands of voters were undeniably disenfranchised with widespread machine failure in Maricopa county. The number is likely greater than just thousands, but I said thousands because that's an estimate so low that nobody can dispute it.
Name one way people were actually disenfranchised by law rather than fluke of technology.
Judge is letting them investigate if it was a fluke or not.
Sure. Let us know when they finish their investigation Donald,
Glad you’re not a judge. Partisan dumbass. Lol.
“However, in doing so, it set a limit on the number of drop boxes a county is allowed to have, ”
Every single house has a drop box at the end of their driveway.
The ONLY legitimate criticism is the short period between the general and runoff elections.
There shouldn't be anything to "drop". Unsolicited mail-in ballots are inherently insecure and should not be used at all.
Have you any evidence that drop boxes lead to significant issues? Actual evidence, that is, not Giuliani B/S?
Have you any evidence that e.g. the editors at Reason or watch dog agencies can go and view and and trace these ballots from start to finish or do so before time expires and an election has to be certified? (Kari Lake was just granted such a request but only for a tiny portion of the votes cast). When that happens, then and only then can you answer the question - is there any evidence that it leads to significant issues.
Try answering my question first.
Kari Lake? Hahahahahaha.
Yeah that brain damaged troll is a legitimate source of jack squat.
How badly did it suck getting a 2.0 in public school?
See Jimmy Carter commission.
Show one ACTUAL example of fraud through mail in ballots. Otherwise shut the hell up.
Man. Brock is really dredging the bottom of the barrel these days.
“The ONLY legitimate criticism is the short period between the general and runoff elections.”
If you lived in Georgia, you would know that the month between the general and special elections is approximately as long as a geologic epoch. Every night I — and a good many other Georgians — prayed, “O God, make it stop.”
By the way, if you had a half decent history teacher in elementary school, you'd know that questioning/doubting/denying elections is almost a fundamentally American ideal.
"election denial"
What are the "election deniers" denying? Seems like "skeptic" or "questioner" would be much more accurate. I'm not convinced that any election was stolen, but people should be questioning elections because the election system is a mess and there is plenty of room for fraud and other shenanigans that would be very difficult to detect after the fact.
The DC libertarian position is that whenever government declares a winner we must accept it as gospel. And if someone claims otherwise on Twitter, we must all learn Mastodon.
A sceptic may question the outcome and then regards the question as answered when no good evidence is provided to overturn the outcome.
A denialist questions the outcome and then refuses to accept it regardless of the lack of evidence.
Happy to help.
So Hillary Clinton.
Sure, lack of evidence is reason not to be convinced that an election was decided illegitimately. But when everyone can see with their own eyes how screwed up elections are and how many opportunities for hard to detect fraud and other cheating there is, it is also pretty unreasonable to just assume that everything is on the up and up. And no one really thinks that our elections are clean and transparent. Democrats were all ready to cry "stolen election" if trump had won in 2020. They are only certain of the purity and accuracy of elections because it became politically convenient to take that position.
Note how shrike demands evidence but refuses to allow evidence to be found with any investigation or means of providing said evidence.
Skeptical? Like the flat earth society?
What happens: Bad behavior is okay when Democrats do it
How I wish people would react: Bad behavior is never okay
How they usually react: I want to behave badly too!
Trouble is that occasionally the Nardzes of the world are right and you do have to fight dirty or be destroyed. I hope we aren't there now and I'm not convinced we are. But sometimes the viable options do all suck and proper behavior gets you ignored at best.
fight dirty or be destroyed
Where do you draw the line between fighting dirty and war? War as in killing people. Part of war is dehumanizing your enemy. They’re easier to kill if you don’t see them as people.
And that’s what’s killing our political debate. If someone disagrees then they have bad intentions. I’m a weirdo who thinks most people have good intentions.
If people would actually talk instead of calling each other names, they might find that they have similar goals. Then instead of accusing the other of bad intentions, they can argue about the means of achieving common goals.
Edit: judge people by their intentions and policy by its outcome
Yeah, I pretty much agree. If people would be less shitty to each, some of the mess could be avoided. I do think most people are well intentioned (though not most politicians, at least among the successful ones). The problem is people are also suckers and want to be told a good story more than to actually understand what's going on.
There probably isn't a clear line between fighting dirty and war. War is what happens when the usual conventions break down. And those conventions that keep people behaving in a reasonable way that is conducive to human prosperity are probably a lot more fragile than most people (or comfortable westerners anyway) want to think.
And the way you preserve a civic society is that sometimes you suck it up and take it on the chin because the "fighting dirty" is what makes those tactics palatable to the other side. That's how you get an actual bullets and bombs war. It disgusts me that some people here seem almost hungry for that. They simply cannot wait for someone, anyone, to give them to go-ahead and start shooting people with colored hair in the streets, because I guess images of burned out cars and piles of dead bodies filling our news feeds from Ukraine isn't as close as they'd like to get to real human suffering and deprivation. When you fight fire with fire, all you get is an inferno. The right would do the cause of liberty a solid if, when the left uses fire, attack them for using fire, not for what they aim it at. They might find that average Americans aren't too fond of the flames either.
The long lines were experienced by early voters in parts of the state completely controlled and operated by Democrats. There aren't enough Uncle Toms on the entire planet to create that kind of Jim Crow.
THANK YOU. Somebody finally said it. The election snafus that are put down to "voter suppression" seem to amazingly mostly happen in urban areas - mostly run by the Democrats. So who the fuck is doing this voter suppression?
A bunch of jackasses.
For years, the Democrats cried because they couldn't get "their" people to the polls. They tried cajoling them, even busing them, but that wasn't enough. Finally, they had the solution, if they couldn't get their voters to the poll, they would bring the polls to their voters. Hence, the huge increase in absentee (mail in) ballots sent to anyone who ever showed up on a voter list which includes almost everyone (remember "motor-voter"?)
There are two kinds of people who won't go to the polls to vote. Those who are too lazy and those who are too busy. These people have one thing in common - ignorance. They don't have the time or inclination to learn about politics, so on what do they base their votes? TV news? social media? movies? college classes? high school classes?
All of these are safely under the Left's cultural control. Look at every state that instituted mail in voting. Most have no state wide Republican office holders. Washington, Oregon, California haven't had a Republican in a state wide office in years (Kim Wyman was nobody's idea of a Republican. She quit to work for Biden)
Since the Right lost the culture war (heck, it wasn't a loss, it was a shutout) the chances of a significant move towards a freer country is next to zero.
“Area man complains that constitutional rights now too easy to exercise”
Also, it's not simply a matter of being too lazy. There may well be costs associated with voting in person - it may require taking unpaid time off, for example.
But sure, anything to prevent "those people" from voting. It's clear that you think that only "Real Americans" should be allowed to vote and run the country.
You'd have been a Democrat...in 1890.
I guess you mean the Democrats can only win if they have the votes of the ignorant because anyone who bothers to understand what they are saying would never vote for them.
Ga had a month of early voting shrike.
Your false cries from ignorance show you to merely be a racist who thinks black people are incompetent.
I never mentioned race, when I said "ignorance" you immediately thought of black people.
Better get your grandfather's Klansman outfit out of the attic before the moths get it.
Apparently it's the democrats braying about about suppression that think black people are incompetent.
"...the chances of a significant move towards a freer country is next to zero."
Which is just fine, as long as we are emulating Great Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand...with progressivism, freedom is slavery, right? And war is peace.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://ukincome6.blogspot.com/
This is classic "both sides" BS. What Trump and his supporters did was make stuff up as a pretext. It was blatant lies. The Democrats are making arguments about fairness and process. Sure lines may have been less than 10 minutes "on average". But the average can mask disparities. There is an empirical being made that the lines are longer in poor districts or districts with more people of color. In other words, the process is stacked against people who are poor who have to move a lot, have criminal records, or live in poor neighborhoods. It's a legitimate argument to consider. That is waaay different than claiming outright fraud and making up stories and generally launching an all-out disinformation campaign as a pretense for a power grab.
Democrats engaged in widespread violations of state voting laws in 2020. That's a fact.
It is also a fact that critical voting districts cannot be meaningfully audited, so that it is impossible to detect or prove fraud; that alone ought to invalidate results from those districts. "Voter intent" and "every vote must be counted" is not an acceptable standard for free and fair elections.
Democrats, on the other hand, are making arguments about "fairness and process", and their arguments are b.s.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.onlinecash1.com
"most of the state's larger and more densely populated counties had previously used."
Should read "most of the state's larger and more densely populated counties had previously used, illegally."
"whereas Trump pressured state officials and made his "rigged election" pronouncements as the sitting president. "
The sitting Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, 2017:
"Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to #ProtectOurDemocracy & #FollowTheFacts."
Followed by 4 years of #Resist, #NotMyPresident, and a 2 year "Russian collusion" congressional investigation.
Yeah, trying to tie people to the evils of the past is a dumb game
Evils of the past? No. Not the past.
Why do they want the statues to stay? Because of the history. The history that tells us who the Democrats in the statues were, what they did, and WHICH group of Democrats put the statues up.
The Democrats want the statues gone so they can re-write their past.
What party does the KKK support? Who cares. What party supports the KKK? That's the question. When KKK members try to run for office as Republicans the party denounces them. When KKK members run for office as Democrats the party keeps electing them until they die.
What party is on record suppressing the black vote? Democrats, as always. In 2020 they did it by closing polling places 'for the pandemic'. The vast majority of polling places closed were in minority areas in states controlled by Democrats.
What a convenient pandemic!
Evils of the past, my ass.
@Idaho Bob: "Nothing about black voters but says volumes about democrat fraud."
You lie!
"Georgia State Sen. Fran Millar (R) vented on social media following the state’s opening of a new early voting location in 2014. “This location is dominated by African American shoppers and near several large African American mega churches such as New Birth Missionary Baptist,” he wrote in a Facebook post."
"In 2012, in response to a state-level battle over early voting hours, Doug Preisse, chairman of Franklin County, Ohio’s Republican Party, told The Columbus Dispatch, “I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban — read African-American — voter turnout machine.”
FWIW Josef, er, JesseAZ keeps claiming I'm a shrike sock - not that he's ever provided any evidence and despite not only denials but obvious internal evidence that I am not. I assume it's because he runs socks and so thinks that others do so as well. Or possibly because he's a malign cunt.
@Azathoth: "In 2020 they did it by closing polling places ‘for the pandemic’. The vast majority of polling places closed were in minority areas in states controlled by Democrats."
Then why did they expand voting hours, go to mail-in ballots, etc?
BTW on your argument the Germans should have retained statues of Hitler, and the Russians, statues of Stalin. Statues are not merely for commemoration, but for celebration. Small wonder the MODERN GOP want to retain them.
Surprisingly, everything these Democrat and Republican looters say about each other is TRUE. High-IQ Georgia voters needed no prompting to vote against both, which explains why Libertarian candidate Oliver spent a mere 10¢ in campaign funds for each of twice as many spoiler votes as it took to throw looters into runoffs. Our opponents averaged 500 times as much money per vote trashing each other before the gang less likely to bully and enslave women voters took the brass ring.
....the gang less likely to bully and enslave women voters in ways they can't do the same to male voters....
Fixed that for you.
A claim that the party who wants as many people as possible to be permanently financially dependent on the State isn't looking to bully and enslave just because they're OK with allowing individuals to make one particular decision is as spurious as the idea that the same gang who was desperate to impose universal mandates for an experimental vaccine to "protect" the masses from a virus with a less than 1% hospitalization rate (even with the knowledge that this particular vax doesn't stop the virus from spreading) for those under 50 actually believes in "bodily autonomy".
No election in the US has been free and fair in decades, if ever. But as long as government was limited, it didn't matter that much.
As for the judge's comment: people can't sue over election problems unless they can actually demonstrate standing and some kind of injury; on top of that, the government has a monopoly on evidence, and people can't get access to that unless the legal system gives them access. That's why he only sees lawsuits where people have lost elections, and that's why people can't bring evidence of fraud.
The law is an ass, and so is the judge.
For not being a Democrat he sure rushes to defend them against true statements.
Trump's complaints about the 2020 election are no longer a problem since he has not held official power since Jan 20, 2021 by Lancaster's reasoning.
The MSM established firmly in the public psyche that the three years spent pushing multiple investigations into an idea that the DNC fabricated almost out of whole cloth doesn't amount to "election denial", possibly because those claims were "supported" with a handful of the worst memes most 4th graders have ever seen (which were pushed via "algorithm" to be almost exclusively seen by people who the system deemed to be near-certain trump voters already).
Also, a multitude of key high-ranking pols within the Democratic party hierarchy (including the incoming House Minority party Leader) calling the sitting President "illegitimate" for 3+ years somehow isn't "election denial".
It's not hard to be less "visible" at something when the partisan MSM is agressive about not only pretending that the fringe on one side is their "mainstream", and that similar behavior by an at least as large portion of the other side either isn't happening or is perfectly rational and wholly justified.
What's alarming is seeing Reason waving the same flag. Is 2023 going to bring a barrage of articles stressing the importance of a wholesale embrace of the full "Green New Deal"?
Only one side used intelligence and law enforcement resources to give credibility to their Stab in the Back®™ conspiracy theory.
Only one side actually lied on a warrant application to further this conspiracy theory.