Students at Yale Faced Mental Health Crises. Instead of Helping Them, Yale Forced Them Out.
Administrative bloat leads to increased indifference to struggling students.

Nicolette Mántica was a junior at Yale who seemed to be thriving, maintaining a 3.8 GPA and participating in a variety of extracurricular activities. But she was also seeing a therapist through Yale Mental Health and Counseling. When she told her therapist that she sometimes cut her arms to cope with stress, she found herself thrown into a cruel and complex system—one that would forcibly withdraw her from the university and place a nearly unsurmountable set of obstacles in her way to be reinstated.
As one administrator allegedly told her, she was "a liability to the university."
Now, Mántica's experience is included in a lawsuit against Yale, alleging that the school's policies violate several federal laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Yale's policies and practices, as described in the lawsuit, reveal both a stunning callousness on the part of Yale administrators and how ever-expanding university bureaucracies don't improve university life but instead develop methods for seamlessly disposing of problem students.
The lawsuit, filed Wednesday by two current Yale students and a mental health nonprofit, alleges that the university's policies violate a number of federal laws, including the ADA and the Affordable Care Act. It explains that Yale pushes students with mental health crises to withdraw voluntarily, often while covertly threatening that an involuntary withdrawal would "not look good" on an application for readmission. Upon withdrawal, students are given only 48 hours to vacate campus and are often escorted by police to their dorm rooms.
According to the lawsuit, withdrawn students must stay away from campus for at least one full term. They cannot return earlier, even if students' medical providers believe they are ready to return to academic life. Making matters worse, students at Yale must graduate in eight to nine semesters, and, according to the lawsuit, "The semester in which they withdraw is counted against the eight or nine semesters in which they must complete their degree."
After withdrawal, students face "a daunting reinstatement process." They must essentially reapply to Yale, gathering letters of support and writing essays showing they have used their time off "productively." The lawsuit claims that the university "provides little help navigating its confusing policies, which require review of multiple and sometimes conflicting webpages to understand the options and consequences for time off…. Often, Yale does not explain its reasons for refusing reinstatement or provides reasons which are inconsistent with its own policies."
In sum, "Yale's written policy, and the widespread belief among students that seeking mental health treatment risks being pressured into 'voluntary' withdrawal or being involuntarily withdrawn, deters students from seeking the mental health treatment they need and from requesting accommodations for their disability."
While Yale's procedures around mentally ill students are disturbing—in fact, at least two student suicides have been linked to the school's withdrawal policies—they also represent a deep disfunction within the university's administrative apparatus.
Yale had rapidly increased its administrative staff over the past two decades, and the school now employs more administrators than it enrolls undergraduate students. However, rather than fostering student well-being, more administrators have ultimately gone to serve the university rather than students' interests. With such an expansive university bureaucracy, it seems that when a student is struggling, they are shunted through a complex set of policies that treat them as liabilities rather than individuals. When students struggle, large university bureaucracies seem unable to see the cruelty—and absurdity—their policies often enforce.
"They never asked what they could do to help with the sexual assault and PTSD. Not a single question about how Yale can support you. They didn't take into account who I was and what I needed," one withdrawn student told The Washington Post. "Their only concern was that I leave."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Not to make light of mental health issues .... but I notice the distinct lack of detail about her mental health issues other than "stress".
I wonder how much of this stress is self-induced by woke worries.
I wonder how much of this stress comes from choosing Yale strictly for its pretentious reputation than any real educational benefit.
I have really no strong opinion about the situation here... there is something to be said about the dramatic rise of the mandarin administrative class in the university system... but I'm trying to figure out what the libertarian angle is here. This feels like an article you'd read in Salon.
Yep. CMD-F "Private" returned zero results.
In a free market we would probably expect to see universities focused on delivering education and education only. Instead, a massive "All Shall University" push, the government has flooded that industry with cheap loan-dollars, and created these uber-institutions.
But beyond that, this seems like a good article to say "Take your cheap money to a different ivy-league private institution". Not really a libertarian perspective.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by yfr-02 doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
They shouldn't have forced her out. But they shouldt be liable for inability to be an adult.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
I can see it as a liability issue. When you have someone who is crazy enough to harm themselves on campus, they might flip out and go on a shooting spree, resulting in lawsuits Or even if they just kill themselves.
Universities are not mental health providers. The goal is to educate and protect the non-crazy students
That may be. That does not, however, excuse the many other allegations about ADA violations (such as the refusal to accommodate by waiving the you-lose-1-of-your-9-semesters requirement, the refusal to acknowledge medical determinations of fitness to return, the requirement to re-apply, etc).
To the extent that your worry is valid, however, the proper response is to seek professional medical opinion about whether that fear is justified in this particular case. That means referring the person to a doctor (and paying attention to the result), not merely forcing them off campus. The university is seeking to break its contract. Bystander safety might be a valid justification but that should require actual evidence, not merely uninformed bureaucratic prejudice.
But I would think libertarians would be on Yale's side about this. The ADA is being weaponized to force Yale to accept students that it feels might be a threat to other students, or to their teaching ability.
Perhaps a student has a doctor's note saying they won't shoot the place up (or commit suicide in a dorm). But why is Yale compelled to take that form? Shouldn't they be allowed to say, "Nah we aren't risking this. Here is a pro-rated refund, take a look at Dartmouth!"
If my psychotic delusions about technology consuming humanity causes me to assault people who have or use prosthetic limbs, wheel chairs, and hearing implants, whom does the ADA proactively defend? Asking for, uh, someone I heard some things about.
How is "stress" a disability? How is being away for a bit a cure and not just symptoms in remission?
You go in with 9 terms to graduate and you spend one not flunking but getting a "did not complete" how is that partial attempt not a use of one term? You leave mid-term but once the stressors is gone you feel better and want to return, how are you better off being behind in an environment you were not dealing with when you were up to date?
Not seeing how Yale is wrong, not looking out for the student or in need of accommodating anything here.
Did you know that "stress" can cause a snowflake to melt?
To the extent that your worry is valid, however, the proper response is to seek professional medical opinion about whether that fear is justified in this particular case. That means referring the person to a doctor (and paying attention to the result), not merely forcing them off campus. The university is seeking to break its contract. Bystander safety might be a valid justification but that should require actual evidence, not merely uninformed bureaucratic prejudice.
Your premise is between oxymoronic, immaterial, and predicated on a lie. Namely, mental health professionals are notoriously no better at predicting violent outcomes than amateurs. You don't have to be a professional to see/know that cutting yourself makes you a danger to yourself (or others). If I have a problem cutting myself or drinking or smoking I seek mental help first. With their consideration/advice, I approach my employer and my continued employment is at their discretion. If The University provides referrals to support that overwhelmingly finds the stress to be non-conducive to participating in a learning environment, you're back where you started and the loonies are in charge of the asylum.
The University isn't seeking to break its contract, the students are presenting them with the grounds/evidence which is clearly spelled out in the contract, handbook, housing agreement, etc.
Oh nonono, Mr. R. They are indeed responsible for EVERYTHING a student might experience/suffer/endure/survive. This per "Shrieking Girl" directed at ex-Prof. Christiakis a few years ago, which perception of the role of the university was never formally pushed back against or questioned.*
Now it appears they are paying for people to formulate and administer procedures to relieve the school from its obligation to provide perfect peace and safety to students...by removing the students. Very slick, and a perfect opportunity to expand staff, budgets, patronage jobs, etc. This is what that high tuition gets you.
*-IIRC, at the time, there was considerable progtard hand-wringing about the criticism and ridicule directed at her from the hateful trolls of the ever-amorphous "right wing". This treatment from the school seems a lot worse than those jokes and memeage.
Get out and make room for someone that can think straight.
I just started 3 weeks ago and I've gotten 2 check for a total of $15,000...this is the best decision I made in a long time! "Thank you for giving me this extraordinary opportunity to make extra money from home.
Go to this site for more details..................>>> onlinecareer1
Get a therapist that isn't affiliated with the university.
Yes, that would seem to be the sensible thing to do. I am wondering about what students were originally told about the Yale therapists and the confidentiality of what might be told to them. There would seem to be a massive conflict of interest if it is unclear whether these therapists are truly acting on the behalf of their student patients, or if they are ultimately acting on behalf of the administration, and can reveal things to administrators that students might expect would be strictly confidential.
Well, who is paying them?
So not the student.
Actually, that is not supposed to matter. A few decades ago, I was seeing a therapist. I didn't have health insurance, and couldn't afford it on my own, so my father paid him. Naturally, I was concerned about the "he who pays the piper" issue, but the therapist assured me that, by law, he had to consider my interests first, and that he was obligated to keep things i told him confidential, and could not disclose them even to my father, who was paying the bill. I expect that is the law in all states, but if there is something in Connecticut law that is different and allows the sharing of private info with with school administrators simply because they pay the bills, that ought to be very prominently disclosed to students when they sign up for such counseling.
For your father, maybe; but not for big brother.
Link? Cite? Anything?
Is Yale the only organization that is responsible for the mental health *of actual adults*? These people couldn't go elsewhere? What happens to people having mental health crisiseseseses that aren't attending Yale? Is my employer responsible for taking care of me?
>>seeing a therapist through Yale Mental Health and Counseling
did they not call it Student Death @UVa?
the school now employs more administrators than it enrolls undergraduate students.
Ridiculous.
administrators have ultimately gone to serve the university rather than students’ interests.
No shit? You mean their loyalty is to who pays them? How is a libertarian surprised, disappointed, or both by this?
Libertarians are not, progressive leftists like Emma on the other hand...
Marshal, no shit, good job, I noticed that too about the HORDES of parasitical leeches, I mean, administrators! ALL looking out for THEMSELVES, and "he who pays the piper".
Therapists in general need to be regarded with a jaundiced eye... Unless you are personally paying out of your own pocket! Else... "he who pays the piper, calls the tunes"! And you might ass well wipe your ass with their promises of confidentiality! Promises, promises! They will keep their promises till their bosses, or the G-Men, show up! Get therapy from a trusted friend is also an option... SOME of their heads have NOT been endlessly polluted by "politically correct" bullshit! SOME of them may be smart enough to call your bullshit instead of endlessly "validating your feelings", no matter HOW whacked out you are!
You can swear loyalty to your employer until the sun goes down, but if you fail to satisfy your customers, your business will suffer.
Simply throwing a customer out of the building doesn't make good business sense.
By customer you mean the crazy MFer that presents harm to the rest of your customers? Sorry cunt but society is not a suicide pact.
I heard that about another university – they kicked depressed students out so their deaths wouldn't make the school look bad.
Only an idiot would ask 'what can we do' and risk lawsuits, if some student alleges something as vague as 'mental illness' vs simply getting this person the hell off campus ASAP until they sort thing out for themselves. Yale obviously spent a lot of time to establish simple and clear procedures explaining the ramifications of what happens, if and when a student chooses to report they have gone nuts. Their response and obligation is to lock down the campus and isolate/remove the student. If they can't be cured quickly, then adios. Parents should welcome and congratulate Yale for this policy.
Yeah. Because I'm sure Yale Medical doesn't have a psychiatry department.
But given it’s Yale can you tell which side of the jacket is the sane one?
Again, am I the only one who stood on the curb for the last couple years as the psychiatry community waived goodbye from the back of the COVID/Twitter/TDS/Troon bus?
Also, I don't know anybody in any capacity with a degree in psychiatry from Yale (or even know if I know). Regardless of how I feel about it, I *can* name a few Yale Law grads off the top of my head.
"...if and when a student chooses to report they have gone nuts"
Unless "gone nuts" is some kind of a fancy diagnosis disguised as simple-minded folk wisdom, you must have read a different article.
Neither of the cases that mentioned specific students presented anything like a threat to other students, or even sounded like they'd "gone nuts". I suppose if Yale wants to take a "better safe than sorry" approach and yeet any students that get depressed, suffer anxiety, or exhibit any embarrassing behaviors...well, that's better than helping them, isn't it? I mean, for the university, not the students.
She cut herself to relieve stress? Was she studying to be a medieval Doctor or Barber? Next time just use the leeches.
"the school now employs more administrators than it enrolls undergraduate students."
This is to assure the alumnux of another 300 years in which freshman down at Yale get no tail.
I am losing patience with dysfunctional students. And probably more grouchy today since one of my students stood me up for a second time, and skipped our research meeting with no notice or communication. Last time he was just “overwhelmed” with course work.
Look, in addition to imposing significant costs to universities, who try to provide counseling and other resources, these student risk blowing up academia. Most get special privileges: extra exam time, delayed deadlines for assignments, mental health day random excuses, etc. In the end, many expect to pass without really do the required work, and with administration support.
WTF is a college degree supposed to signify (and certify)? That they attended day care for 20-somethings?
Not just "day care", but the RIGHT day care! A prestigious day care in which they networked and made connections with others in the class of people who are deemed worthy to attend a TOP day care.
Their degree is their entre into the world of the elite, the rulers of us plebes and denizens of flyover country. Doesn't matter if they learned anything. They got in, and they got out with that piece of paper-next stop DC, or New York, or Silicon Valley, or LA!
Perhaps her and her roommates can watch dead man on campus
Were these the same students who were triggered by Halloween costumes?
I just started 3 weeks ago and I've gotten 2 check for a total of $15,000...this is the best decision I made in a long time! "Thank you for giving me this extraordinary opportunity to make extra money from home.
Go to this site for more details..................>>> onlinecareer1
Just walk it off!
At one time people who were admitted to universities, especially prestigious ones, were considered adults and beyond the need to be treated like children.
I graduated in 1993 and could see the infantilization of students beginning to happen then. Think it really took off though in the past 10-15 years when kids who had been medicated most of their lives and had everything decided for them by helicopter parents started to show up.
From a marketing perspective both suicides and students who have to take extended medical leave look bad, the latter potentially raising the average time it takes to graduate. Yale could instead admit better adjusted young people to take their place, but have no idea how you can screen for that without discriminating against mentally unstable people. So instead they admit them and take their money until the inevitable breakdown, then show them the door.
Liberals hate, even other liberals.
The reports are many liberals fled to Mastodon after Musk let conservatives back on Twitter. Reports are on Mastodon with no conservatives to report liberals are now reporting other liberals to the point many are coming back to Twitter!
Liberalism really has turned into a mental disease.
I wonder if one issue is the risk of massive legal liabilities regarding students known to be suicidal.
In general, I think Yale should take a hands off approach. Students have to meet academic expectations. If they fail to meet these, dismissal is the result.
I disagree that emotional difficulties fall into protected categories of disability. It is one thing to provide audible narration to a blind student, who will be able to function in many jobs with accommodation. It is another to train students to expect that they will be accommodated in NOT performing their jobs, due to emotional difficulties.
"Students have to meet academic expectations."
Really? More like students have to have the right expectations about race and gender and socialism.
This seems like a strange take for a libertarian web site. Yale is a university. Why should it get into the business of treating mental health?
I just see this as an indictment of the ADA. This woman used it as an excuse to make her problems everyone else's problems.
Her cutting met the standard under most state laws of "harm to herself or others." She's lucky she wasn't involuntarily institutionalized.
Yale should have no obligation to be required to manage that sort of serious mental illness.
When your mental health professional tells you that they will keep what you tell them confidential, they are lying.
My adult daughter was living with me and seeing a counselor. For reasons that still mystify me, that counselor felt compelled to call me and tell me things that my daughter had confided to her. The counselor agreed that my daughter wasn't a threat to herself or anybody else, and that nothing illegal was happening. Nevertheless, the counselor felt that I ought to know. The same thing happened a couple of times when my daughter was still under 18.
You had a bad counselor. This should only happen if the patient agrees to the release of information. The only other case is one where there is a specific threat to the patient or to others.
This is a great reason to go slow on providing mental health care at school. Any school from elementary to college. If the mental health professional is a member of the school staff there is an inherent conflict of interest, and they may be looking out for the school more than their patient. Because of access it may make sense to provide mental health services at the school or on campus, but there needs to be a complete firewall between the school and the service provider.
Most people with mental health issue are more a danger to themselves than to other. So school are more often protecting their image rather than their students.
Thanks for article! Many students experience significant stress during their studies. This may be due to the high intensity in training. Now that the final exams are approaching, I have a lot of work to do. I'm working on my dissertation, but it's not very good. There is still plenty of time, but I have no idea where to start. Therefore, it is very important for young people to receive support from such online educational projects as https://www.essaywritinglab.co.uk/ in which I order the writing of ready-made essays or dissertations. This helps me a lot.