Challenging Fauci, Documenting Government Outrage: What Reason Does With Your Donations!
Read some of our Top 10 stories from the past year!

So what has Reason done to deserve your hard-earned, tax-deductible donation money since our last record-breaking webathon? A quick tour through our traffic leaderboard over the past 51 weeks shows the type of depth, variety, and commitment to sometimes niche defenses of individual liberty that have for more than half a century helped convert your cash into far-reaching journalism and commentary dedicated to Free Minds and Free Markets.
Before we go much further, though…WON'T YOU PLEASE DONATE TO REASON RIGHT THE HELL NOW???
OK, here are five samples plucked from our Top 10 list of past-year eyeball-catchers, along with brief elaborations of the genres from which they spring.
- "Anthony Fauci Says If We Could Do It Again, COVID-19 Restrictions Would Be 'Much, Much More Stringent,'" by Robby Soave.
For the past year and a half, Senior Editor Robby Soave has, in addition to cranking out crackerjack Reason content on tech policy and education and pop culture, been a host on Rising, the daily webcast produced by The Hill. There he has engaged in some memorable (and occasionally censored) debates with commentators from across (beyond?) the political spectrum, and conducted some libertarian cross-examination of notable newsmakers.
Such as Dr. Anthony Fauci.
"If I knew in 2020 what I know now, we would do a lot differently," Fauci told Soave. "The insidious nature of spread in the community would have been much more of an alarm, and there would have been much, much more stringent restrictions in the sense of very, very heavy encouragement of people to wear masks, physical distancing, what have you."
Revealing things happen when Reason staffers interact with the powerful. Your donations make that possible.
2. "Mom Handcuffed, Jailed for Letting 14-Year-Old Babysit Kids During COVID-19," by Lenore Skenazy.
True story: I was recently in Tel Aviv, listening to Inbal Arieli, author of Chutzpah: Why Israel Is a Hub of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, extol the virtues of her country's "free-range parenting." Such is the reach of our intrepid defender of childhood and parental freedom.
Appallingly if not quite surprisingly, the piece in question isn't the only "moms handcuffed" in the Skenazy archive. There's "Mom Handcuffed, Arrested for Oversleeping While Her Son Walked to School," from 2015, and "Mom Handcuffed, Jailed for Making 8-Year-Old Son Walk Half a Mile Home," from just last month.
Here's how the COVID-handcuffing story begins:
When COVID-19 shut down her children's daycare in May of 2020, and Melissa Henderson had to go to work, she asked her 14-year-old daughter, Linley, to babysit the four younger siblings. Linley was engaged in remote learning when her youngest brother, four-year-old Thaddeus, spied his friend outside and went over to play with him. It was about 10 or 15 minutes before Linley realized he was missing. She guessed that he must be at his friend's house, and went to fetch him.
In the meantime, the friend's mom had called the police.
Skenazy's journalism and advocacy expands the zone of familial freedom and introduces normies to government overreach. Your donations make her work possible.
3. "Texas Roofer Arrested in Florida for Helping Hurricane Victims," by Eric Boehm.
Speaking of government overreach, here we've got a classic Reason twofer: The madness of occupational licensing, and the warped policy making of disaster relief. These are the types of subject that, on their own, can feel a little bit like pushing a boulder uphill against popular sentiment and government (mal)practice. But like your snack candy of choice, the two tastes combine to produce some easily digestible libertarian insight.
Reporter Eric Boehm wrote about the case of Texas-based roofer Terence Duque, who came to offer his services in a part of Florida devastated by Hurricane Ian. And then:
Duque was arrested for "conducting business in Charlotte County without a Florida license," the Charlotte County Sheriff's Office announced on Friday. If charged as a felony, that's an offense that could carry up to five years in prison under Florida law—although it's possible that Duque could be charged with only a misdemeanor offense that carries a mere one year of jail time.…
Duque got busted for his good deed after the Charlotte County Economic Crimes Unit—which is apparently a real thing—received a call from an investigator with the state Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR).
When a detective with the sheriff's office tracked down Duque, the roofer reportedly said he believed he was allowed to work in Florida due to Gov. Ron DeSantis' emergency order that loosened licensing rules in the aftermath of the storm. "The investigator informed Terence that this was not the case, and that Terence would be placed under arrest, as he had already done work in violation of the statute," according to the Charlotte County Sheriff's Office.
Outrage stories like this are a gateway drug into libertarianism. Your donations help to keep us cranking 'em out.
4. "Tom Cotton, a Second Amendment Champion, Proposes a 5-Year Mandatory Minimum for Violating Arbitrary Gun Bans," by Jacob Sullum.
Another great two-great-tastes-in-one—Senior Editor Jacob Sullum's market-leading meticulousness (meticulosity?) on gun-policy journalism, plus our free-floating distaste for one of the Senate's least appealing gasbags.
Year in and year out, Sullum attracts well-earned eyeballs for his coverage of core libertarian issues—guns, free speech, pharmacological freedom, criminal justice, and how to use drugs in space. Your donations not only keep him doing this valuable work, it helps develop the next generation of baby Jacob Sullums.
5. "The FBI Seized Almost $1 Million From This Family—and Never Charged Them With a Crime," by Billy Binion.
Did someone say baby? Not that Mr. Binion is that young, quite—he's going on his fourth anniversary producing bang-up criminal justice journalism for Reason. But in both his magazine/website coverage and his Twitter feed promoting thereof, Billy is a master of introducing people to policing outrages they can't quite believe is legal.
In this particular piece, Binion writes about Carl Nelson and Amy Sterner Nelson, whose lives were upended by a massive cash seizure by the FBI during its investigation of Carl for possible kickbacks—an investigation that never produced any criminal charges. "We went from living a life where we were both working full-time to provide for our four daughters to really figuring out how we were going to make it month to month," Amy told Reason. "It's completely changed my belief in fairness."
Having lured readers in with a story of an outrageous injustice, Binion then broadened their horizons:
They're not alone. There was the Indiana man whose car was seized. And the Kentucky man whose car was seized. And the Massachusetts woman whose car was seized. And the Louisiana man whose life savings were seized. And the Texas man whose life savings were seized. And the countless Californians whose money and random personal possessions were seized. Sometimes the money is returned—often only when a defendant manages to lawyer up for a civil suit. Sometimes only part of it is. Sometimes none of it is. "Civil forfeiture is quite common," says Dan Alban, an attorney at the Institute for Justice (IJ), a public interest law firm that often litigates similar cases. "The fact that the government can do this can obviously ruin lives, and it can ruin lives without anyone being convicted of a crime, without anyone even being charged with a crime."
Your donations make Billy Binion's work possible, as well as the variety of writing and commentary Reason has been delighting and infuriating readers with since 1968. Won't you please donate to Reason today?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Not possible. Reason are shills for Fauci and all the rest of the Democratic Agenda. I learned it here, from The Commentariat!
The Wise Commentariat knows that the political spectrum is limited to Democrats and Republicans, and disagreement with one equals support for the other. That means libertarians are simultaneously hardcore progressives and hardcore conservatives. Depends on which team you ask.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by yfr-08 doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Jesus, you’re boring.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Why do they call us leftist Sarc and Jeff ask.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://www.LiveJob247.com
If by “challenging Fauci” you mean ball gargling.
idjit
I’m assuming you’re aware that Fauci actually requested Soave as his “challenger”. It was a softball interview. So, much so that his colleague quit over her not being able to come in to pose actually challenging questions.
You don't have to be a Trump loyalist to think Fauci deserved a lot more honest a challenge than Robby gave him.
Link it and I'll take a look.
Diane does below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlYdJLj3TLI
Narrator: And he never looked. Just like he didn't the last dozen times this has been mentioned.
Sarc beclowns himself once again .
At least until it was OK to spit Fauci's nuts out.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link.............>>> onlinecareer1
Um, you posted the Hill interview, which was a softball, no-challenge love fest where Fauci literally requested the "libertarian" to even agree to the interview, because he knew Kim Iverson would rail him on questions? Seriously?
Kim Iversen on why she left The Hill over that "challenging Fauci" interview... hint: There was no challenge.
This right here. Reason (robby) was hand picked by fauci for an interview because they knew reason would be bushleague at worst, and complicit most likely, and reason was
Welch quite lieing.
To be clear, not reason. It was Robby in concert with The Hill. It was not Robby's shining moment, and Reason is not covering itself in glory trying to highlight it.
Where exactly and how strenuously had anyone at Reason pushed back against any of it? That interview was not a shining moment in any objective sense but compared to the rest of their coverage it was.
I just watched some of that. After she listed off a few loaded questions I lost interest. May as well have said “I wanted to ask him if he still beats his wife.”
Edit: I see people here like to ask such questions thinking they've got a "gotcha," because they sneak premises into the question such that any answer implicitly validates the premise. That or the person being asked the question argues against the premise that was snuck in there, in which case they're accused of dodging. I can't tell if it's fallacious or dishonest, but in the end it doesn't matter.
LEAVE FAUCI ALONE! QUIT CHALLENGING HIM!
JFC, he lied in that interview, and no one called him out on it.
When you masturbate in public do you use mineral oil or petroleum jelly?
Before you and Robby give Fauci an MMM blowjob, do you whisper in his ear, "lemme show you how a Libertarian does it"?
When an interviewer asked loaded questions then it’s a spectacle not an interview. The woman in your link said she wanted to ask why he promotes a vaccine that doesn’t work. You may think that’s clever, but it’s JesseAz and Mother’s Lament level of dishonesty. As in pond scum. But you probably think they’re swell dudes.
Goddamn you’re a dishonest prick.
"The woman in your link said she wanted to ask why he promotes a vaccine that doesn’t work."
This isn't what she asked. Here is what she said:
Q1: "Does he still support mandates for these non-sterilizing vaccines" (2:32)
Q2: "With the mRNAs not succeeding in stopping the pandemic, why is he still pushing *for* them." (2:36, emphasis mine)
Those are not "have you stopped beating your wife" questions. It is a well known fact that he supported mandates. It is a well known fact that these vaccines are non-sterilizing. Now, Fauci may believe that there are still reasons to mandate, even if they are non-sterilizing. If so he should articulate that.
And these are valid questions. Many people tolerated vaccine mandates if it was going to stop the pandemic. But we know that even when you get 90%+ vaccination rates in countries like Israel, you don't actually stop the spread. So given that it doesn't stop the spread, and only protects you individually, many, many people wonder what the reason is for continuing to push mandates. And Fauci, as the #1 pusher of mandates ought to be able to answer for that.
Yes, but they go against the narrative that Sarc has constructed in his mind so he blindly found a way to dismiss it without any inspection.
That interview was commented on far and wide on why it was such a softball interview/missed opportunity and how Fauci only agreed to do the interview when the two hosts were hand-picked in advance. "Challenging Fauci" indeed.
I use your mom.
Almost as bad a defense as when sarc complained about commenters attacking Biden.
"A few loaded questions"? I just watched it. What questions were there at all, let alone loaded ones?
Liar.
“The woman in your link said she wanted to ask why he promotes a vaccine that doesn’t work.”
Just wow.
Reason posted a The Hill interview? Do you mean that they actually hosted it on the Reason site, or that someone like ENB linked to The Hill interview?
almost worth paying you for the laugh on the Challenging Fauci! part
Challenging Fauci.
Libertarian standard-bearer: Hey, Fauci, how big a whopper can you tell?
Fauci: Hold my beer.
https://twitter.com/songpinganq/status/1598344121176948742?t=feHDXzvPGk26QQ2wCzmntA&s=19
JUST IN - Health officials in China's Hangzhou city going from door-to-door to remove residents from their homes to quarantine camps.
These residents weren't even infected with COVID.
[Link]
They were infected with a desire for freedom.
This is always where it was going.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/chinese-covid-protocols-used-to-stifle
Last April, Chinese banks unexpectedly froze the accounts of numerous customers without a plausible explanation. Recently, would-be protestors trying to get their money back found their digital covid health apps ‘red’, meaning they lose access to nearly all public services.
This is a perfect real-world example of the tyranny of covid health passes. Obviously these protestors don’t actually have covid. They aren’t a public health threat in the slightest. They are a POLITICAL nuisance — so the ruling class simply turns them off.
And don’t worry, this is coming soon to an area near you. After all, it’s so unseemly to physically confront protestors — much better off to unperson them from a safe distance.
https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1598256179163299842?t=VhbDGSPXJmo73gqjy6BRhQ&s=19
This is real and is still happening in 2022
[Pic]
Anyone else notice these articles are all from this year, after the Media gave the okay to start questioning The Science? Is it really standing up if you wait for court cases and nearly 3 years to pass before you say something?
I see the usual leftists here defending Reason for their past 3 years of stances.
Reason was 100% complicit as an active participant in the most massive crime against humanity ever committed.
It's just after the midterms. Gotta burn through all the bad stories ASAP so they will be 'old news' by 2024.
Kind of like how it suddenly became alright for lefties (even some of the commenters here) to bash China just after Xi’s purge last month. Suddenly, everyone has tough words for China because he took out “our” guys in the CCP. It was like a switch being flipped at American Bolshevik Central, and the word went out across much of the western media and diplomatic circles.
I’m all for hating on the CCP, but it was strange to watch it happen.
What Reason does with donations is pay people to write pieces in support of federalizing local elections.
https://reason.com/2022/12/01/some-arizona-republicans-are-refusing-to-certify-an-election-is-congress-paying-attention/
Glad somebody noticed that junk article.
"Challenging Fauci" while showcasing the video of Robby specifically NOT doing that. (Remember, Kim Iversen quit because she wasn't allowed in that interview, but Robby was!)
I think it's pretty telling that the guy here so quick to accuse others of just being Republican shills and not true libertarians finds the idea of questioning the premises of a totalitarian career bureaucrat beyond the pale.
I mean he attacked people against masking, attacked people against vaccinations, attacked people calling covid camps in australia concentration camps...
He has literally defended every step of the State in propaganda for covid.