The Space Force Is an Expensive Farce
Why does the newest branch of the U.S. military need horses?

The last successful cavalry charge in military history took place in Poland on March 1, 1945—more than a decade before the first man-made object would exit Earth's atmosphere. So it might come as a surprise to learn that the U.S. Space Force—the sixth and newest branch of the military, created by President Donald Trump in 2019—has a stable of decidedly earthbound "military working horses" at the Vandenberg Space Force Base on California's Pacific Coast.
That makes about as much sense as anything else connected to the Space Force, which will cost taxpayers a little more than $18 billion this year. For that kind of cash, the horses should at least get to wear jetpacks.
The Space Force has always been something of a joke. Unfortunately, it is now a very expensive one. If there is any lesson to be learned from the first few years of the branch's existence, it is that Congress cannot resist dumping money on the Pentagon—even when the Pentagon doesn't want it.
Top Defense Department officials opposed the new service, which they viewed as too expensive to be practical. "At a time when we are trying to integrate the [Defense] Department's joint warfighting functions," then–Defense Secretary James Mattis wrote in a 2017 letter to Congress, "I do not wish to add a separate service that would likely present a narrower and even parochial approach to space operations." Those operations, Mattis noted, were already under the Air Force's purview.
In a country run by sane leaders, that would have been that: If the military says it does not need a Space Force, there is no reason to create one. But that's not how the federal budget works. Vice President Mike Pence was trotted out in August 2018 to give a speech confirming that, yes, this was happening. "It's not enough to have an American presence in space," he said. "We must have American dominance in space."
As Americans learned during the first two decades of this century, a dominating U.S. presence in faraway places does not come cheap. A September 2018 memo from the Pentagon confirmed the bill for a new Space Force: $13 billion during the first five years.
Once again, hope flared that the Space Force might not make it off the launchpad. "Too costly and beyond what is needed" was how then–Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson described the idea to the Washington Examiner shortly after the memo was released.
Politics also threatened to crash the Space Force. "I am concerned" that a new branch of the military "would create additional costly military bureaucracy at a time when we have limited resources for defense and critical domestic priorities," Rep. Adam Smith (D–Wash.), then the highest-ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, told Defense News in November 2018. He promised that Democrats would block the creation of a Space Force if they took control of the House in that year's midterm elections, which they did.
Yet when the National Defense Authorization Act, a $738 billion monstrosity that officially created the Space Force, went before the House in December 2019, it passed with broad bipartisan support. Just six Republicans and 41 Democrats voted against it. It turned out that Democrats in Congress liked spending money on the military almost as much as Trump and the Republicans did.
As with all military programs, early estimates of how much the Space Force would cost have proven to be hopelessly naive. Although the Space Force was supposed to cost $13 billion total during its first five years, Congress hiked the branch's annual appropriation to a bit more than $18 billion in the budget it passed last year. In March, President Joe Biden proposed giving the Space Force $24.5 billion next year. Congress had yet to vote on that budget plan as of early October.
There are unseen costs to consider too. Every brainy American with one eye on the stars who gets lured into the Space Force will become another cog in the military bureaucracy rather than working for productive (and peaceful) space-based companies in the private sector.
As for those horses, the military probably is not planning to blast them off to the moon or Mars anytime soon. In another bizarre twist, the Space Force inherited the horses from a conservation program formerly run by the Air Force, which originally was tasked with maintaining the military's equine capacity so soldiers could reach otherwise inaccessible regions.
The advent of military helicopters made military horses obsolete decades ago. But the Air Force still had horses, and now the Space Force has horses, because the military bureaucracy only ever grows. The Space Force itself is proof of that.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.?????????.???
I get paid over ?200$? per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over ?10k? a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job (mjd-48) online! i do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
BOOBS ON THE MOON!
"more than a decade before the first man-made object would exit Earth's"
My brother in Christ, MW 18014 in *1944* is the first man-made object into space.
Sputnik was in *orbit* in 1957.
Fucking 2 minutes googling.
Hey--what's this?
In another bizarre twist, the Space Force inherited the horses from a conservation program formerly run by the Air Force, which originally was tasked with maintaining the military's equine capacity so soldiers could reach otherwise inaccessible regions.
Oh, a reason for the horses that makes your entire article stink like the leftist trash that it is.
That is not a reason for the horses to still be owned by the government at all, much less for them to be now owned by the Space Force.
It takes a lot of horse power to get a rocket off the ground. ??
The base is 100K acres of mostly wilderness. They have natural habitats to protect, so the have their own small crew of game wardens.
The Forest Service does the same sort of thing. Most of their patrolling is done by trucks and ATVs, but there are places where those cannot easily go.
The whole article sounds like an echo of the arguments that the Air Force was not needed, because the Army Air Corps was sufficient for the task.
Russian missiles hit Poland today and this is the shit they’re publishing.
The horses are there because of environmental laws and regulations. Basically, motorized vehicles are banned, even helicopters, in many of the areas of the base. If Boehm had taken the time to do some basic research he would have found this out. Then he could have written a decent article about the stupidity of many environmental rules and regulations. Instead, he wrote this pile of shit. Yes, the Space Force is a stupid allocation of funds but pointing to the horses, and totally ignoring their purpose, is not the way to convince people. When they find out the truth, that Boehm only alluded to, it makes them less likely to side with him. This was just lazy journalism, but that seems to be becoming the norm for Reason. Lazy journalism and appeals to outrage rather than reasoned arguments. I'm starting (okay in honesty I already have) concluded that journalism majors are the dumbest folks to graduate universities, even worse than those morons who take ethnic studies, or educational administration degrees.
Oh, and how is that new frontier of decentralized currency known as cryptocurrency doing, the one Reason assured us was the future?
It's entirely possible that the horses were very useful toward the mission of VAFB overall. Probably 99% of the equipment, personnel and infrastructure needed to put something successfully into orbit only leaves the ground if it's being transported on an airplane. Maybe they were used to help clear wildlife away from runways (for transport planes coming in) or away from launch pads at critical times; in the portions of my career where I've worked on rockets and other spacecraft, none were ever designed or tested for surviving a bird strike the way jet airplanes generally are.
According to the results of a 10 second search, VAFB "inhereted" the horses in 1996 form another base which was closing in 99. Also, the "military working horse" program at Vandenberg ended in Aug 2022 because 2 of their 3 horses were retired for medical reasons and the third was sent to a USMC mountain warfare training base, I guess in case we decide to go back into Afghanistan (or really because the military is required under US Federal doctrine to always be preparing to solve the last biggest problem that's been faced).
Creation of extra bureaucracy and logistics in splitting the "Space Force" out of the USAF was almost certainly a huge waste of resources for little or no benefit, but the horses at VAFB weren't any real part of the reason.
I recall reading that the horses are actually useful for maintaining the base infrastructure for the launch facility in areas that are not accessible by roads. This smells of lazy reporting.
There's more lazy reporting too.
1. Except this was formerly an Air Force program, mostly, and they didn't want to surrender all that budget control.
2. Just like Homeland Defense, this is not new money other than the normal overhead of an extra bureaucracy. It merely transferred budget items from other departments to the new one.
Did the actual military say that? This article quoted the Secretary of Defense at the time, who is a civilian.
"The Military" doesn't lose any budgetary control from splitting the Space Force out of the Air Force, both are still within the Dept of Defense, and managed out of the Pentagon.
The split would necessitate creation of a new upper leadership hierarchy, and probably add anywhere between several and dozens of new "flag" positions which may or may not actually add any "value" to the execution of the same mission that was being handled by the parts of the USAF which are now the USSF, and apparently creation of their own "boot camp" that's separate from USAF Basic Training (and probably involves a lot more math classes and fewer "confidence courses" than USMC boot camp); that part probably costs at least 10x what the working horses program (which wasn't created or expanded in any way with the splitting of the Space Force) did before it was closed a few months ago.
Regarding the horses in particular, there is stupid reporting there too.
Really? Can yee nae imagine places where horses can go and helicopters cannot?
Like heavy forest.
Or duration. A cop on horseback can patrol all day; a helicopter for an hour or two, makes a lot more noise to warn bad guys, and are easier to hide from. Well, helicopters can carry IR imagers. But then they need someone on the ground to tell deer and bears and mountain lions from humans.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
AND GOOD LUCK.CLICK HERE.........>>> onlinecareer1
18 billion is one days spending. Throwing out numbers in the billions when the government spends trillions is an exercise in futility.
Why does the newest branch of the U.S. military need horses?
For the Space Cowboys. Next you'll be asking why they need trucks.
Cute hook to the article--but your editorial team/fact checkers dropped the ball. The U.S. Space Force announced in July, 2022 that the Vandenberg horse unit (which was inherited from the Air Force, and was used to patrol 99,000 acres of wilderness on the base) would be shut down.
The unit was deactivated on August 9; two of the four horses were retired to a farm in Bakersfield, California; the other two were transferred to the U.S. Marine Corp to be used in training special ops troops (who do, in fact, still use horses).
And I found all that by just typing "vandenberg horses" into Google Chrome.
Do a better job next time.
"And I found all that by just typing “vandenberg horses” into Google Chrome."
Whoah now, that's far too much work for the Reason writing staff.
The Current Federal Government Is an Expensive Farce
We used donkeys in Afghanistan. Also, US Special Forces, the CIA, and the Northern Alliance carried out a mounted offensive against the Taliban in 2003 which can only be described as a Cavalry charge. They carried the day. The occupation may have been a failure, but that battle was a success.
The use of animals in warfare has changed but not gone away. One of the most critical shortages in the military almost every year is the Veterinary Corp. Why would a modern military need a Veterinary Corp? Because military animals remain a vital part of the mission of almost every branch and not just for ceremonial duties. Boehm obviously has never served a day in his life or he wouldn't have written this article the way he did. Horse mounted patrols are more effective in several situations that helicopters and or fixed wing aircraft are not suitable for, or even wheeled vehicles. Additionally, military posts are subject to state and federal environmental and conservation regulations and therefore motorized vehicles may be banned in parts of military posts, either part of the year or year round. Ask the tankers at Ft Irwin or the Marines at Twenty-nine stumps what happens when a desert tortoise is found on a range. Or Ft Hungry-Lizard, Yakima Training Center and Camp Parks when they find a burrowing owl nest.
Eric Boehm,
Are you against Space Force because you don't like Trump?
Personally, I favor having Space Force and removing some power from the Air Force. I favor creating smaller more focused government pieces. I would also advocate breaking up the Army and Navy into smaller entities and removing the Marines from the Navy.
I would reduce the military budget by 1/4 to start, but also reduce entitlements. All of government has grown too large and too powerful. I want to break to collaboration and force government departments to compete.
Nothing wrong with having a Space Force. The problem is government bureaucrats and their spending habits. They do not run government like a business which is what some departments should be doing. Fence Company Carrollton TX