Latest GDP Numbers Aren't Calming Recession Fears
The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reports that GDP grew 0.6 percent in the third quarter of 2022.

Economic growth ticked up ever so slightly last quarter, but not by enough to console those worried about a looming recession.
Inflation-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) grew 0.6 percent during the third quarter of 2022, for an annualized growth rate of 2.6 percent, according to new numbers released by the U.S. Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
These numbers come after two quarters of shrinking GDP. The top-line growth rate was clouded by declining consumer spending on goods, falling investment in new single-family housing construction, and a declining savings rate.
Inflation and rising interest rates continue to act as headwinds on the economy. That all has made analysts pretty glum about the new numbers.
"Ignore the headline number—growth rates are slowing," said Michael Gapen, chief U.S. economist for Bank of America, to The New York Times. "It wouldn't take much further slowing from here to tip the economy into a recession."
"If you take a step back and look at GDP, it's gone effectively nowhere over the last year," seconded Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, in comments to NPR. "One quarter or two it's down a bit. This quarter it's up a bit. But net-net, we're kind of treading water."
Two quarters of declining GDP has long been a shorthand, but not the official, definition for declaring the economy in a recession.
When the economy did post two straight quarters of declining GDP earlier this year, the Biden administration argued that the word recession was inappropriate. Other factors like growing consumer spending and job growth meant the economy was humming along, despite the top-line GDP figures, they said.
The latest BEA numbers are something of a mirror image of GDP during the first half of the year, notes the Times' Ben Casselman. The overall economy is growing, but consumer spending is weak and falling in some categories.
Fears of a looming recession will likely undermine Democrats' chances in midterm elections that are already shaping up to be a "red wave." High inflation and a wobbly economy have persistently fueled voters' dissatisfaction with the status quo. Axios noted on Sunday that polls show Republicans have a six-point advantage with registered voters, and Republicans are also expressing more motivation to vote.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And yet, the WaPo and team blue cheerleaders keep telling me not to worry about the economy-everything’s just ducky! Unless team red wins in November, then all hell will break loose.
Inflation is going to make everyone millionaires Nick. Isn't that great?
Yeah, don't you want a $400,000 car* and a $4 million dollar house** too?
*4 cyl, subcompact Yugo-wannabe
**800 SF, 2 bed, 1 bath, slab on grade
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (ans-05) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link————————–>>> http://Www.TopCityPay.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
https://vimeo.com/695767702
Imma tell you what people need. PEOPLE NEED MONEY! LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY!
Wow. Was expecting to see a dozen variations of "You voted for Biden, you wanted this, waaaah!"
Pleasantly surprised.
Pleasantly surprised
That Reason Editors aren't getting their noses rubbed into the mess they helped make?
That whiny bitches aren't bitching and whining.
You’re the designated whiny bitch around here.
And apparently a brain damaged alcoholic based on the anger he showed when they were brought up earlier.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
You did though.
Well, some of them "reluctantly" voted for it.
Some people vote against the other guy. They don't really support the one they select. They think the other guy is worse. The "lesser of two evils" trap. It's why I don't vote.
Show me someone I can vote for and I'll sign up.
We don’t need likely atheist dolts such as you pretending you. Shut the _____ up until your little panties grow enough courage to take a stance.
No one here cares about your sensitivity charade.
You stand for nothing, you fall for anything.
Clearly with previous responses you are a closet bidenite without a cajone to admit it.
You lose any position since you don’t vote. Away with you, scamp!
You can say fuck here.
Maybe the guy who wasn’t sending is straight towards a nuclear war? But no, only two things mean anything to you in the whole world. Consuming as much alcohol as you can before your liver shuts down for good, and your pathological hatred of Trump.
You understand this makes you unworthy of respect or civility, right?
First they came for the pronouns - - - - - -
Now they are coming for tenses - - - -
"In a 1974 article by The New York Times, Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Julius Shiskin suggested that a rough translation of the bureau's qualitative definition of a recession into a quantitative one that almost anyone can use might run like this:
In terms of duration – Declines in real gross national product (GNP) for two consecutive quarters; a decline in industrial production over a six-month period.
In terms of depth – A 1.5% decline in real GNP; a 15% decline in non-agricultural employment; a two-point rise in unemployment to a level of at least 6%.
In terms of diffusion – A decline in non-agricultural employment in more than 75% of industries, as measured over six-month spans, for six months or longer.
Over the years, some commentators dropped most of Shiskin's "recession-spotting" criteria for the simplistic rule-of-thumb of a decline in real GNP for two consecutive quarters."
I am able to obtain 80 dollars per/hr to complete easy work working off of a home computer. I not at all realized that it is possible however one of my greatest mate has collected $25k only within three weeks completing this super job furthermore she satisfied me to avail.
Discover further guidance by reaching following website.......>>> Topcitypay
Fears of a looming recession will likely undermine Democrats' chances in midterm elections that are already shaping up to be a "red wave."
Democrats' lies can't penetrate American wallets.
This. What looming recession? We are in a recession. These counts need to stop towing the party line
Wow, I was expecting to see Sarc start his standard troll thread....and...expectations met.
Acting like a whiny bitch about whiny bitches.
You guys crying "You wanted this!" "You voted for Biden!" "Reason is leftist!" and so on isn't trolling, but me calling it stupid is. Gotcha.
You guys got what you wanted.
Time to suck it down.
"You guys crying"
Who's 'you guys' kemosabe? I have never argued this.
On the other hand, like a very crazy cuckoo clock, you reliably post one of these trolling threads, and then complain that the comments section is full of trolls.
If I do not then it's a chorus of "Fuck Joe Biden" and "Reason voted for Biden" blah blah blah from people who truly believe that they are clever.
Good looking out sarc.
Yeah, but Fuck Joe Biden.
It isn’t trolling, just accurate.
It's happy hour somewhere.
"Inflation and rising interest rates continue to act as headwinds on the economy."
This should be a lesson in just how fucked up our economies are. In a sane world, Interest Rates would be a reflection of economic conditions, not a contributor of it. Interest is the price for borrowing money. But the world around, these prices are controlled by the government and their cronies.
Imagine if the government tried to control homelessness by setting the price of rent. Or if they tried to control hunger by setting the price of foods...
Wait never mind. Please don't imagine. Better not to give them ideas.
Too late; been there, tried that.
Millions starved and froze.
Like Socialisming, price controls have never been tried by 'the right kind of people'.
I'm sure when it's tried by 'the right kind of people', it'll work flawlessly. Or something.
"fears"? Haha i hate to tell you this but it's already a recession. The White house changed the definition of recession as soon as the recession started.
"It's only a recession if we can blame it on Republicans".
And Reason seems to have signed onto the change.
The recently reported "growth" is small enough that they can easily "adjust" it back to no growth after the election is past, it's well within the range of such adjustments.
looming?
Right. And, J6 was an insurrection too.
where the only armed people were police who acted like doormen?
Well, doormen who shoot unarmed women.
“There was nothing wrong with the economy the last 6 months, and it’s recovering now”.
So, who here actually seriously believes that the GDP really went up 2 6% in the third quarter, and who thinks it's a last ditch end of the game desperation Hail Mary pass by this shitty regime to prop itself up before the election in the form of a highball number that will be revised way downward in a few weeks from now?
Plus, The Wall Street Journal yesterday: Some data suggests that inflation is as low as three percent.
and,
Canada will expand euthanasia to children without their parents knowledge.
Everything, all the time, is a parody. It would be hard for a dystopian screenwriter to make this stuff up.
"desperation Hail Mary pass by this shitty regime to prop itself up before the election in the form of a highball number that will be revised way downward in a few weeks from now?"
I have zero doubt. ZERO! This is turd polishing at it's finest!
Fatass Donnie q2 2020 - NEGATIVE 31% GDP after negative q1
Trump cult --- crickets chirping............
Sleepy Joe q2 2022 NEGATIVE .6 of 1%
Trump Cult --- RECESSION DEPRESSION STAGFLATION STARVING FOLK!!!
6/10 of one percent - Trump Cult implodes....
q2 2020 – NEGATIVE 31% GDP after negative q1
Trump cult — crickets chirping…………
What?
You do realize that -31% came after everyone and his idiotic brother, sister, and second cousin once removed locked down and closed up most all economic activity, worst in the states with Democrat governors?
Yes, the -31% was COVID driven.
The point is today’s GDP was in line with Trump’s first three years and you guys are losing a nut for no good reason.
When the Fed gets their real recession then you can bitch.
LOL, you took one fucking quarter out of three years, when the last two years have been absolute shit, and said "DERE EXACTLY DUH SAYM GAIZ HERPITY DERPITY DOOOOOOOOOOOOO!"
It’s a shame we don’t know who he really is. It could save a lot of children’s loves from being destroyed if the right people became aware of his……. appetites.
-31% was progressive Democrat driven.
You’re like a walking, talking Patrick Starfish meme.
It wasn't Covid driven, it was lockdown driven. Covid wasn't bad enough to impact the economy, the economy had gone through worse pandemics in the past without so much as a twitch.
I'd be interested to know which "worse pandemics" we have gone through "without so much as a twitch".
Disease, year(s), death count, duration, and GDP numbers, please.
I didn't hear nobody sayin' nothin' bad about Mr. Trump till 2021. Anyyou other mooks heard anyone sayin' somethin' bad about Mr. Trump till 2021? How about you ITL "The Troll", you hear anything? No? Howzabout you, SPB2 "The kiddie diddler", you hear anything? Nope?
See? Nobody heard nothin'! Quiet as a Catholic deaf-mute at a funeral.
Buuuuuut DRUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMFFFFFFFPPPP!!!
You are more of a broken record than Sarcasmic and his whining about whiners.
If the whiners would stop whining I'd stop whining about them.
No you wouldn’t.
We’re not whiners, you are. So just STFU and crawl back into your bottle you fucking wino. I think we’ve all been far more polite and patient with you than you deserve.
No, you are!
Do you realize how many people across the country would have to be involved for that to happen? This isn't an arcane, secret set of data that only the government has access to. There is a vast industry of companies that do the exact same projections with the exact same data.
Next you'll tell me that we are really experiencing stagflation and the unemployment numbers are being faked by the government.
And yet every quarter gets quietly revised a few weeks later if the numbers are worse….
Yes, numbers almost always get adjusted. There isn't anything unusual or conspiratorial about it. It is literally business as usual, as more data comes in. The math involved is a little more complicated than figuring out how much to tip.
Well, the 2,6 number is about as good a a government number can be.
But further down the page, most of the "good" part is from trade balances, aka selling the SPR overseas.
But at least the uptick brings the YTD back up to zero.
Good news for America.
Bad news for clingers.
So you like stagflation, jackass?
The Kirkland subroutine likes what its programmers tell him to like.
So you like stagflation, jackass
Some idiot tried to redefine stagflation in the AM links and his rank-ass stupidity was called out.
Stagflation requires high unemployment and we are at full employment.
No one is redefining anything. You are just an illiterate retard who don't understand the meaning of words. This growth report is terrible. When you combine it with the inflation rate and the fact that it decreased for the first two quarters, you get stagflation. The economy grew .06% last quarter. Sounds good until you realize that it contracted by the same amount in the second quarter and contracted by .02% in the first. Add it all up and you get a big fat 0 economic growth for the year.
That is called stagnation, shit head. Again, go lie somewhere where people are dumb enough to believe the lies. You are the dumbest person on earth. Stop embarrassing yourself.
Oh yes, I recall now. You were that idiot.
And you're doubling down?
Zero economic growth for the year. Only someone as dumb as you are could not understand what that means.
It's not stagflation, you idiot.
Zero percent growth for the year. That is called stagnation. We just finished two quarters of contraction. The economy should have grown much faster coming out of that. It didn't because we are stagnating. Next quarter it is likely to contract again. The next zero or negative growth for the year.
How many times do you have to lose this argument?
Inflation has soared to four-decade highs in 2022. In August 2022, the CPI-U (Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers) increased by 8.3% compared to the same month in 2021.
However, we're not seeing signs of stagflation -- at least not yet. We are seeing signs of slow economic growth, with real GDP declining at an annual rate of 0.6% in the second quarter of 2022. But there are two big caveats. First, this GDP decline comes on the heels of rapid (5.9%) GDP growth in 2021 as the world started to normalize from the 2020 pandemic restrictions, so it is a comparison to the pent-up demand we saw in 2021. And, second, this is actually an improvement from negative 1.6% GDP growth in the first quarter. In other words, it’s not a big cause for alarm just yet.
On the employment side, things are clearly going well. In September 2022, the unemployment rate in the U.S. was just 3.5%, almost an all-time low. Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 263,000 in September, so the job market is holding up quite well.
Oct 2022 Matthew Frankel
You just defined stagflation, doofus. We've had high inflation with a slowing economic growth rate. Or are you guys trying to redefine that too, like you did with recession?
lol the idiots were telling us all through 2021 there would be no inflation, either.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/inflation-and-you
receipts in comments.
That is called stagnation
Now you're just making shit up.
Actually, you're making the shit up.
We’ve had high inflation with a slowing economic growth rate.
No, dumbass, you keep leaving out HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT - which is a necessary component of stagflation. We are at record high employment.
There is NO stagflation as of today.
High unemployment isn't quite as necessary as you make it out to be. Plus, there are a lot of folks who've left work and just never returned to the workplace, oh Oracle of Dogdick(head), Georgia.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. Turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit,, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Quit shitting the fucking thread up, Sevo.
I'm busy bouncing Briggs' head like a basketball.
Yeah, like the Washington Generals to his Harlem Globetrotters.
Keep on dreaming away, Buttplug.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. Turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit,, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
No, but you’re still a pedophile. How’s that going? Why don’t you turn yourself in, or better yet, end your own life before you destroy a child’s.
"When you combine it with the inflation rate and the fact that it decreased for the first two quarters, you get stagflation."
No, stagflation is when you have slow growth, high inflation, ... and high unemployment. We have very, very low unemployment and businesses are still desperate for workers. So you are absolutely wrong.
Let Forbes explain it to you. They know a thing or two about the economy.
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/stagflation/
Uh huh. And how about that big drop on the labor participation rate?
Nifty Graph
According to this graph the LFPR is at about the same level it was in 1976.
You mean the one in April 2020 when it hit a 50-year low at 60.2%? That was on Trump's watch.
The LPR was .5% lower in January 2022 than it was in January 2018 (one year into each Presidency). The LPR has been dropping steadily since 2000. It seems like that might be a trend unconnected to economic policy, since it would take a heroic level of bullshit to argue that the economic policies of Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden were the same.
Are you in the camp that thinks that the labor participation rate (which contains all employed and unemployed-but-looking people) somehow adjusts the unemployment rate (which is a wholly included part of the LPR)?
I'll try it this way.
Labor Participation Rate = Employment Rate + Unemployment Rate, where ER = total employed ÷ total labor supply and UR = total unemployed and looking ÷ total labor supply. Total labor supply = all non-military and noninstitutionalized citizens over 16.
You can't raise the unemployment rate without raising the labor participation. It is literally, mathematically impossible.
You also can't change the definition of the unemployment rate at a whim because it has had the same definition and the same formula for decades.
Since there are plenty of jobs out there for those who want them, the only reason someone looking for a job would be discouraged is if they don't think the wage was sufficient.
That seems to be the problem. Normally employers would raise wages and compensation to secure the workers they need, but they haven't done that.
"...we are at full employment."
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit,, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Weird he keeps repeating the full employment lie when more than half the states still have less jobs than 2019.
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/sep/23/report-shows-31-states-and-dc-still-have-fewer-job/
And yet businesses are dying for workers.
The definition of full employment is when everyone willing to work at the going wage rate is able to get a job.
The problem is that the going wage rate right now isn't sufficient to entice workers and companies have been reluctant to offer more. Until they do, or until the savings of the workers waiting for a good offer run out, we will have a pool of available workers sitting on the sidelines.
No. The problem is wages aren't high enough to offset the free benefits from not working. End welfare and the wages would be high enough.
You have to have a job to get welfare. Welfare has been workfare since Reagan was President.
"The problem is that the going wage rate right now isn’t sufficient to entice workers and companies have been reluctant to offer more."
No, the problem is companies having to compete with (taxpayer supplied) 'free' money.
Stagflation is a period of high inflation and low economic growth. The employment numbers are incidental though they normally track with growth.
Yeah, that is not even a little bit true. Stagflation is low growth, high inflation, and high unemployment. Anyone who tells you differently is lying to you.
It's easy enough to find on your own. A Google search will return exactly zero reputable sources that don't include high unemployment as one of the three aspects of stagflation.
Shit, I didn't even see this when I made my post. Apparently the crazy is flying by the bucketful today.
Inflation continues to eat into your pathetic fixed income. I doubt a loser, former small town newspaper editor has much income or much margin of error.
I thought we confirmed he was an anime character?
Someone said the other day he is some retired newspaper editor in some shit town in Pennsylvania. I have no idea if that is true but it seemed to be the consensus. Loser small town retiree angry at the world for not recognizing his genius fits Kirland to a tee. If he isn't that, he is something similar.
Yeah, that was me. I only know that because Arthur L. Hicklib power leveled himself one day and was humblebragging about it. He's also said that he grew up in one of those places, so you can see why his self-loathing is nuclear-level.
And he also let slip shortly after he first showed up that he got beat up a lot growing up.
Not enough apparently. He still doesn’t know his place.
Buttplug most butthurt.
Just in general. That's got nothing to do with the GDP.
One thing I've always meant to ask but never got around to it until now: In a free market, prices fluctuate based on many factors and that's supposed by libertarians to be a good thing. When those factors cause fluctuations and the Fed tries to control prices by adjusting the prime lending rate and the money supply, that's supposed to be a bad thing because it prevents the free market from making the automatic corrections necessary to arrive at a spontaneous optimax solution. But why do free market economists prefer one over the other, and why?
Because 'experts' wearing suits are objectively worse at controlling the market than natural market variations.
Observe attempts by Communist nations to centrally plan their economies and what death tolls are attached to those attempts.
One can make the case that a mixed economy is 'best' but that's really the camels nose under the tent in preparation for a totally controlled economy in most cases. That rachet only really turns one way for most nations.
You’re working too hard. Retard presents a false dichotomy to ask the 'question' “Why do people have a preference. And… why do people have a preference?”
Because price changes that are not centrally controlled typically reflect local actors with specialized knowledge of their customers, supply chain, line of business using all that knowledge to try to achieve optimum results and please customers.
Contrast to some central planner bumbling to control everything with the two or three macroeconomic knobs they can twiddle.
" But why do free market economists prefer one over the other, and why?"
1) It's pragmatically better: Prices are the integrated signals of millions or billions of agents all processing local conditions and desires. When you artificially constrain prices through controls, you get shortages (when you set the price too low) and wasteful gluts (when you set the price too high). Interest is just a price for money, and when you screw around with the price of money, you create shortages and gluts- which are expressed in boom and bust cycles.
2) It is moral. Controlling prices is interfering with a person's freedom to set the terms of their association with others and the right to do what they want with their property. This is wrong.
Inflation-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) grew 0.6 percent during the third quarter of 2022
Per the Biden administration, 2 weeks before an election.
See my post above. Total BS. Turd polishing move. This number gets "adjusted" later and it'll be negative.
As I mentioned above, that would take a conspiracy of vast proportions involving people inside the government as well as people in the private sector. Many, many people in the private sector.
Economic forecasting is a multibillion dollar private sector business. If there was one number from the government that showed growth and a wave of private sector projections that showed contraction it would be one thing. But this isn't that.
Amusingly, this growth reflects poorly on central planning (a core economic tool of Democrats). What does it say when the Fed rate is raised precipitously and there are only two quarters of small contraction in the economy as a result? What does that say about the ability of the central bank to control economic conditions.
There were two ways the stimulus money from Trump and Biden was justifiable. One, because the pandemic was predicted to be deflationary and the economy needed the influx to balance it. But, more importantly, both of them had the built-in argument that, even if they overcorrected and caused inflation to skyrocket, Trump had lowered the Fed rate to zero so they could just raise it and bring inflation back under control.
How'd that work out for them? They jacked up the Fed rate to cool the economy and ... it hasn't cooled. This is an A+, prime example of why planned economies don't work.
Imagine what will happen if all of those people who aren't willing to take jobs for the salaries that are being offered get back in at the same time (relatively speaking)? More capital in the economy will raise demand (and with it, inflation). And the tool to control inflation? More Fed rate hikes.
It's almost like economies can't really be planned. What a shocker!
Take a look at the GDP estimate around the Obama/McCain election and subsequent revision.
Scratch that - Obama/Romney.
Look at the initial GDP estimates almost every time and yiu'll see the same thing. Whether there is an election or not, these numbers always get adjusted as more hard numbers come in.
It isn't a conspiracy. It's the way things happen almost every time.
Yeah, it never gets revised down…
https://www.usnews.com/news/economy/articles/2022-06-29/1st-quarter-gdp-growth-revised-down-1-6
They get revised almost every time. Sometimes up, sometimes down. The chance of an estimate being spot on once all the data comes in is vanishingly small.
If Democrats are smart, they would tank their own chances of winning anything so they can blame all this economic stuff on Republicans.
I know they're trying to blame Republicans for it in advance by saying Republicans are going to tank the economy on purpose but that's not going to age well once the economy inevitably tanks under Democratic leadership.
Or maybe, just maybe, they can blame everything on 'obstructionism' by the minority party again and hope no one knows how the FedGov actually works. A safe bet, if the past is anything to judge by.
Democrats don't have a track record of smart political maneuvering.
If Democrats are smart, they would tank their own chances of winning anything so they can blame all this economic stuff on Republicans.
They put up Katie Hobbs in Arizona against Kari Lake and then advised her that she could completely avoid debating Lake without any consequences, so there may be something to that.
Flashback to 2020: Lie to the King edition
Trump denies 'massive recession' even as his top economic adviser warns of 'terrible' economic numbers
Kudlow declined to offer a numerical figure for just how much higher he forecasts unemployment numbers to get, but he didn’t mince words when asked if the country is looking at double-digit figures.
“The numbers are going to come in very badly, they’re going to look terrible in the weeks ahead,” Kudlow said during an interview with Fox News.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-denies-massive-recession-top-economic-adviser-warns/story?id=69962106
THAR WARN'T NO RECESSION WITH TRUMP !!!
We are in one now. The economy contracted for two quarters in a row. It is growing a bit now but it is likely to fall back into recession next quarter. Meanwhile, we have 10% inflation along with energy and food shortages that are only going to get worse.
Just shut the fuck up you worthless piece of shit. No one believes anything you say. Go back to posting child porn links.
Actually no don't do that. That's bad
It'll get him banned again. Short term hurt, long term gain.
If a pedo posts child porn links but he's muted did the links really exist? From that perspective, no pain all gain.
Indeed, as brilliant as your economic analysis has been under Biden, I think your work under Trump was even stronger. You literally predicted there would be a harsh recession in 2020 caused by ......... tariffs.
Go ahead and take a victory lap for that, Mr. Buttplug. It more than makes up for your other predictions ("Jeb will be the 2016 GOP nominee!")
Jeb still has that Bush charisma.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. Turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit,, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
What charisma? That shine wore off a long time ago, just like your ability to predict the future.
Jeb! is a joke.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. Turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit,, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
...
What?
What is your problem?
The economy went into the shitter in 2020. 14% UE, -30% GDP, massive public assistance, etc.
Yet Trump Cultists were silent.
Today we get a very average 2.6% growth report and the Trump Cult is apocalyptic.
The Trump Cult is Whack.
Yet Trump Cultists were silent.
What?
Buttplug's fixated on Trump for some reason. Maybe it's envy, maybe it's being stuck in Dogdick, Georgia.
I thought I heard Trump supporters yelling.
Stop shutting down the economy you shitty democrats!
"You were mean to Trump but give Biden a pass!"
"Oh yeah? You're mean to Biden and give Trump a pass!"
"You!"
"No you!"
"No you!"
.
.
More like:
Shrike: nobody said shit to Trump about recession cause cult.
Also shrike: here’s a link to a story about one of his advisors telling Trump a recession was inevitable.
mad.casual is pointing that out, nothing else. Jesus H Science
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit,, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis reports that GDP grew 0.6 percent in the third quarter of 2022."
And inflation? Thanks, droolin' Joe!
Welcome to Venezuela....
We haven't crashed just yet.....
F'En Nazi's(National Socialists).
Third quarter GDP up? Well, former colleagues tell me orders and shipments were up this summer as customers rushed to place and take delivery before announced price hikes went into effect Oct. 1st.
Maybe (and I'm being cynical) the 3rd qtr. numbers will be "adjusted" downward after Nov. 8th, but let's see how the 4th qtr.'s look. Then the recession will hit just as the GOP Congress takes its seat, allowing the media to crow that the Republicans have ruined the economy.
I'd love for it to be true and damn the political optics, I'm not a sociopath, but truth is there are no gains in my sector and there isn't a pocket of robust growth to be found. There may be dribs and drab of post pandemic gains to be found but they aren't much and surrounded by oceans of pandemic standard resetting to sell a shit sandwich economy as partially recycled.
Odd how the Traitors at Reason report this quarters economic growth as growth per quarter, but report negative economic decline as an annualized figure which is the montly figure multiplied by 4.
Pack of Treasonous Liars at Reason.
Worries about a looming recession? Is this like how I have worries about a looming one-party regime here in California?
All this “looming” business sounds like a bunch of spin to me!