Biden Mistakenly Imagines That Congress Approved His Student Debt Cancellation Scheme
The lack of statutory authority is the main issue raised by legal challenges to the plan.

President Joe Biden recently claimed his student loan forgiveness plan was authorized by "a law" that he "just signed" after Congress narrowly approved it. "It's passed," he said during a NowThis News panel discussion. "I got it passed by a vote or two."
In reality, the debt cancellation program was never approved by Congress, which is the main argument underlying several legal challenges to it. By trying to unilaterally relieve some 43 million Americans of the obligation to repay the money they borrowed for college, those lawsuits say, the Biden administration overstepped its statutory authority, violating the rule of law and the constitutional separation of powers.
In August, the administration announced a program that would cancel up to $10,000 in student debt owed by individuals earning less than $125,000 a year or couples with incomes below $250,000. Recipients of Pell Grants would receive up to $20,000 in relief.
Penn Wharton researchers project that the plan could cost more than half a trillion dollars over 10 years, even without taking into account the administration's proposed changes to the income-driven repayment program, which likewise will reduce what borrowers owe. The beneficiaries include many Americans who could readily afford to pay off their loans, while the people picking up the tab include many Americans of more modest means.
Since voters with college degrees favor Democrats, the political advantages of announcing this perverse redistributionist scheme a few months before the midterm elections are pretty clear. The plan's wisdom and fairness are much more debatable, and its legal basis is even more dubious.
The Biden administration claims that Congress authorized mass student debt cancellation in 2003, when it approved the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act. That law allows the secretary of education to "waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to" certain student aid programs "in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency."
The timing of that law, the comments of its supporters, and the bill's "findings" show that it was aimed at helping "the men and women of the United States military," whose Iraq War duties might interfere with their ability to make loan payments or meet bureaucratic requirements. But the Biden administration argues that the COVID-19 national emergency is a license to reduce or eliminate the debts owed by more than 40 million Americans, regardless of whether the pandemic actually hurt them financially or impaired their ability to meet their loan obligations.
Inconveniently for Biden, he declared that "the pandemic is over" weeks before the Department of Education planned to start implementing the debt forgiveness program. Furthermore, the federal government froze interest accrual and waived loan payments for most borrowers during the pandemic, and that forbearance extends until the end of this year, which makes the alleged connection to this particular national emergency even more tenuous.
Before Biden suddenly discovered the authority to forgive student loans en masse in the HEROES Act, members of Congress repeatedly tried to achieve similar ends through legislation that went nowhere. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D‒Calif.) emphasized that only Congress could authorize the sort of relief Biden is now touting.
"People think that the president of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness," Pelosi told reporters in July 2021. "He does not. He can postpone, he can delay, but he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress."
The Education Department agreed with Pelosi's assessment before reversing that position to accommodate the president's plans. Until recently, Biden himself was not claiming that he could unilaterally forgive student debt, instead saying he would happily sign a bill to that effect.
Contrary to what Biden mistakenly recalled during that NowThis conversation, Congress never passed such a bill. The question for the courts, assuming that plaintiffs can establish their standing to challenge his debt cancellation program, is whether he can do what he wants regardless of what the law says.
© Copyright 2022 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I was going to say another way to put that is “Biden lied his ass off” but the dementia is so advanced, he probably believes what he said.
Some have suggested his handlers lied to him about what he was signing, and he probably really does believe it went through Congress.
It’s as plausible as anything else. The guy is incoherent, long past what it takes to invoke the 25th amendment, but his handlers are terrified at the thought of Kamala in charge; a senile Biden is easier to manage than Kamala.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i've had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.
Read all about it here.......>>> Topcitypay
The guy is incoherent, long past what it takes to invoke the 25th amendment, but his handlers are terrified at the thought of Kamala in charge; a senile Biden is easier to manage than Kamala.
There are no good short term options. We can't even make a judgement call because we don't even know who is really in charge. The best option is to keep them both out of sight for 2 more years I guess.
We can’t even make a judgement call because we don’t even know who is really in charge.
But we do know that whoever is in charge is going a shitty job.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (vr-64) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link————————–>>> http://Www.TopCityPay.Com
John Kerry.
It isn’t cute. We are facing down the growing probability of a nuclear exchange with Russia. Biden and his administration should be removed for the sake of the entire human race.
It wouldn't surprise me if that was the case, but if that's true, why the fuck would you tell your boss something like that if you know he's not all there, and has a career-long reputation of just making shit up to begin with?
As much as I detest Biden, this shit seriously is in the realm of elder abuse. He needs to be relaxing in Delaware eating his ice cream in retirement, not acting as the veneered, surgically reconstructed face of the US. That goes for a lot of these guys who are in there WAAAAY past their sell-by date, like Pelosi, Sanders, Grassley, and Cocaine Mitch. We need to get mandatory retirement clause for these people put in the Constitution somehow--74 and older need to get the fuck out.
but if that’s true, why the fuck would you tell your boss something like that if you know he’s not all there, and has a career-long reputation of just making shit up to begin with?
Because you know that the majority of the "news" media will run cover for you.
Agreed. Kerry is a sociopath
"I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience." - Reagan
Hey, give them some credit. It took literal days for them to come up with that "mistakenly imagines" euphemism.
But I would like at least one of them to explain how any product of the imagination can be mistaken.
Misguided? Sure.
Patently false? Absolutely.
But mistaken? Simply not possible. Whatever is imagined being a whole cloth fabrication of the imagination. Nothing more and nothing less.
What is possible is someone being delusional enough to confuse a product of their imagination with actuaL reality.
None of which Sullum remotely bothered to address. This article being an all too obvious attempt to say they covered the issue while entirely eliding the substance of the issue.
The guy they all helped drag across the finish line is displaying delusion thought, no doubt due to advanced dementia.
Hey Reason, just fucking admit it you lying sack of weasels.
Exactly. Why pretend he was mistaken? He was either lying, or more likely, has simply so lost contact with reality at this point that he doesn't have a clue what's going on outside his head.
"Mistake"? As if.
They use the same non-sense mistake/misspoke excuse with Biden repeatedly referring to "President" Kamala Harris.
LOL Imagine the Reason headline if Trump had done something similar.
Yes, this article PROVES for the billionth time, that Reason.com LOVES Biden, and HATES Trump! It is TOTALLY CLEAR for all to see... All right-wing wrong-nuts, that is!
Their absolute inability to draw the obvious conclusion from Biden's behavior says more about Reason than anything they put into words.
The volume of speculation by Sullum ALONE regarding Trump's motives, and mental state not remotely being balanced by the SUM of Reason output covering Biden.
It's beyond obvious.
What we know is that whomever is running the Biden Administration (it surely is not Joe) has utter contempt for the law if it interferes with their political goals. This lawlessness needs to be resisted as strongly as anything that Trump did.
That's a lame statement. They still haven't proven that Trump did anything.
Since when did the Democrats, with their star chambers, cooked up investigations and impeachments ever demand proof of anything?
Accusations were good enough for the writers here. Why shouldn't they be good enough now?
Oh, right. Democrats...
Great
Biden is living in a fantasy world brought on by dementia. He doesn't know his own ass from a hole in the ground, and can't remember his pre-programming long enough to complete an interview anymore. But hey, puppet masters can always chalk it up to his previous 40 years of stupid gaffs. Biden makes the perfect political puppet.
...his previous 40 years of stupid gaffs...
...and just plain making shit up.
What I find interesting is the disconnect between the machinations that are required to achieve some of these goals vs the oath to defend the constitution that they all take. (I'm not just talking about Biden, I'm talking about many of the laws that congress passes as well.) The opposing media seems not to care about flagrant oath violation, at least not enough to call them out for it.
Perhaps it's a technically defensible position that they actually believed it was constitutional... but really?
Obviously, few, if any, take that oath seriously. The Constitution's been ignored for so long, and as long as the courts and the people let them get away with it it doesn't matter. They're just words they have to regurgitate before taking office.
And to think that that senile old bastard is going to be re-elected President in just a couple of weeks and then he'll be able to appoint all new justices to the Supreme Court and fire Tom Brady.
Good one!
Biden is not running in the Nov 2022 election.
That posr-Halloween horror show wont be seen until Nov 2024.
Who cares? Why are we even talking about Biden? Just because he's President right now? I'd rather talk about Trump or Bush or Palin. Hey, remember when Palin said she could see Russia from her house? That was funny!
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
Joe Biden is guilty of fraud and treason. He should be impeached and executed for his crimes.
Calm down, glowie.
He's just channeling his mentor Nancy Pelosi.
Agreed. Except his entire cabinet should be put down along with him.
The plan's wisdom and fairness are much more debatable
What is remotely debatable about student loan forgiveness? Ideally opposite sides of a debate stand on ideas and principles in conflict. Nothing resembling either is an element of this vote-buying scheme. There is no wisdom to relieving people of a debt they voluntarily took on, no fairness to asking people to whom the "benefit" of the college education will not accrue, to pay for the loan. It is indefensible. Period.
Not to mention the kick in the ass the responsible ones get, those who prioritized repaying their loans, or who passed on the degree or the school they felt they could not afford. And the double kick in the ass of having to pay through their taxes for the irresponsibility of their lessers.
(This is not all that much different than continuing to bail out or subsidize those living in disaster-prone but otherwise attractive areas. People with integrity don’t buy there, or if they do, they don’t think they are owed all new stuff every few years — but they pay for others who do.)
Colleges increased in cost as they morphed into brainwashers. This occurred before, when the 18th Amendment replaced the entire Bill of Rights for 14 years. A fine for a case of beer could run to hundreds of thousands of today's dollars. This policy also wrecked the economy and with it any hope of legally paying the fine. Younger students watched Nixon subsidies again pack government with rabid mystical prohibitionists and unequal-yet-apposite communist reactionaries such as plagued FDR. The "loans" like the "fines" were a trap.
You’re a drooling idiot. You’re not clever, and you communicate poorly. If you’re allowed in public people will cross the street to avoid you,
He's a barking moonbat, alright.
The only argument for fairness would be in viewing the student loan system as a way for the government to transfer money to the colleges. Students who should never have attended college were able to attend and little else. It’s similar to the “predatory lending practices” for mortgages enabled by the government.
I don’t agree with that argument, but it is an argument.
By that logic students who already paid their loans off would also get the 10K.
What pisses me off even more is the complete lack of debate over the root causes of the issue. I agree that college costs too much and has a poor return on value for many degrees. How about we talk about making lenders eat bad paper for loaning 200k for a masters in sea slug reproduction? Address why the costs are increasing in the first place rather than applying a bandage to a festering wound. It's the same problem I have with immigration. It's a whole lot of emotionally pandering moves that fail to address the core of the problem.
You can thank us for the situation. We voters reward the pandering. Politicians are just amoral idiots (charitably) blindly following votes.
Grover Cleveland was 71 his second Administration, yet never forgot to cite chapter and verse of the Constitution authorizing his each and every exercise of authority. Reagan's and Nixon's party arrogate infinite power and so dispense with silly preliminaries. But Ronnie only once repeated the same speech twice in a senior moment, toward the end of his second term. The only valid statement either gang can make is the threat that THE other half of the Kleptocracy is way worse. Nixon subsidies keep the media dinning that fake either-or at terrified voters.
Hell no Joe is soon to be rendered effective lame duck status in losing Congress. At least I hope that will mitigate the damage over the next two years.
Quo usque tandem will looter laws prohibiting betting on elections keep us from challenging loudmouthed necromancers to put their money where their predictions are?
Do you even know what you're talking about? I suspect you don't.
In any regards, any election with irregularities warrants an investigation.
Hi. Good Night everybody.
Biden's 4+ decades of lying about things just like this puts the 'mistakenly' where it belongs, an far-fetched excuse from a journalist covering for the administration reasonmag voted in.
Either way - mission accomplished. The Dims "tried to help" and those mean Pubes put the kabash on it.
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i've had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.
Read all about it here.......>>> Topcitypay
Wait, what did Biden actually say, fully, and in context? You've got a bunch of snippets and it's really unclear how connected they actually are or what else was said. Not convincing.
"I got it passed by a vote or two."
Maybe he's thinking the vote is his, on the Executive Order?
Or maybe the "vote or two" was the first Court that threw out the challenge due to (supposed) lack of standing?