Liz Truss Resigns as British Prime Minister
After just six weeks in office, the embattled Conservative leader is out.

British Prime Minister Liz Truss has resigned after just six weeks in office, capping off a politically and economically chaotic tenure. Her resignation follows a period of market turmoil spurred by her economic plans, which included a package of deficit-financed subsidies and tax cuts intended to offset high energy costs.
On October 14, Truss responded to the backlash against her economic platform by firing Chancellor of the Exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng. "One independent analysis expected it to cost taxpayers 190 billion pounds ($207 billion) this fiscal year," the Associated Press reported, with "opponents accus[ing] the government of dodging scrutiny by rolling out a major shift in economic policy without the normal analysis from the independent Office for Budget Responsibility."
Kwarteng's replacement, Jeremy Hunt, quickly backtracked on his predecessor's policies and denounced debt-driven economics. "We are a country that funds our promises and pays our debts," he said earlier this week as he announced plans to reverse nearly all of the planned tax cuts and downsize the energy subsidies.
As Hunt rolled back Truss' economic platform, financial markets stabilized but the political atmosphere did not. In advance of a vote yesterday on fracking—which Truss wants to legalize but many Conservative members of Parliament oppose—her administration threatened lawmakers who voted to block fracking with dismissal from the party. Enraged by the pressure, 40 Conservative MPs abstained from the vote. A YouGov poll this week indicated that just 10 percent of Britons held a favorable view of Truss.
"I recognize that given the situation, I cannot deliver the mandate on which I was elected by the Conservative Party," Truss said in her resignation announcement. Upon leaving office, she will become the shortest-serving prime minister in British history.
Her party is set to elevate a new prime minister by October 28. Former Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak, who previously criticized Truss' tax cuts as a "fairy tale" and said that "borrowing your way out of inflation isn't a plan," is a favorite to succeed Truss.
Her successor "will have to navigate a political crisis and economic turbulence," notes The Wall Street Journal. "The new leader is almost sure to face a long winter of discontent, with real wages forecast to fall, labor unions promising a series of strikes and many voters demanding elections."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can’t take the heat, get back in the kitchen.
Truly an enlightened viewpoint and comment. *eyeroll*
Quitting when the job is not princess snowflake is the attitude problem
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (ks-08) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
Women, amirite?!?
Well, to be fair, there was that Margaret Thatcher gal, who seemed to do pretty well.
Britain is a disaster. And we’re not far behind them if we don’t get rid of the democrats.
American rights > democrat lives
The UK is a disaster because of the Conservatives and the Labor Party. The US is not far behind them because of the Republicans and the Democrats. All administrations in both the UK and the US over the last several decades have contributed to the looming disaster by playing musical chairs while Rome burned (sorry about the mixed metaphor) and now that the last chair is gone they are all acting surprised that the matches they were playing with finally burned their fingers - the fingers they have been using for finger-pointing (more mixed metaphors - sorry!) As Gomer Pyle used to say, "Surprise, surprise, surprise!"
Here's the question: why don't American citizens demand more from their political parties? Why don't we demand that our politicians act like adults in the room?
You don’t. You’ve carried enough water for the democrats to fill a small lake.
A small lake? Don't insult Mikey. He's carried enough water to fill Lake Erie.
He’s carried enough water to fill Lake Erie.
Fetid, stagnant, toxic...sounds about right.
Touché.
Several different reasons for different kinds of citizens. First and most importantly most of us are too busy living to waste our time on a process that has been doomed by the two-party system to fail. Other reasons include: some citizens actually like it when the political parties act like children; and many citizens feel that there is no way to make politics better.
Americans DO demand more. And the Power Elite ignore us.
They demand more spending, that much is clear.
Do you have evidence to support your claim? Please cite your sources.
Because a lot of the people that vote aren't acting like adults either. They actually like the mud-slinging, screaming fit, tantrums because it makes for entertainment for the masses.
And that's just the woke and antifa.
Because most American citizens (most people really) are very short-sighted and/or ignorant. There is a built-in desire for everything to be free, even though we know intellectually that nothing is really free. People just keep wanting to believe that this time is different. Either that or they don't care as long as the burden falls on someone else.
That's what we were promised two years ago.
The US is a disaster because of global Marxism and it’s adherents in both parties. They should be utterly destroyed, as all Marxist should be utterly destroyed. People in this country are slowly waking up to that unavoidable fact.
Destroy them all, while we can.
American rights > democrat lives
Truss was the less "Democrat-like" of the two leadership choices the Conservative party had over the summer. Which makes your analysis rather confusing.
Unless you mean "get rid of the democrats" in the sense of bringing in a strong leader once and for all...
An extreme conservative wreaks havoc and dipshit says we have to get rid of Democrats. Partisans are DUMB AF
The dumb one would be you if you think she was even slightly outside moderate. GFY you marxist ignoramis.
Truss was destroyed by her Libertarian policies.
Similarly Libertarian policies like NAFTA have destroyed America.
The world is laughing at everyone riding the Libertarian clown car.
Bill Clinton, Libertarian. I see.
Now if we could only get all of Washington to resign and start over... that would be something.
The only hope for America now is for proportional representation in the form of ranked-choice, at-large elections in every state for Congress and the state legislatures to replace the gerrymandered district-based plurality takes all two-party election system. Anything else that might save us from worsening chaos would require a Constitutional amendment which is very unlikely. That would bring us the better parts of the Parliamentary system of the UK without the bad bits.
Or a constitutional convention, such as what Steve Bannon is apparently advocating. Perhaps it is time to rejuvenate the Constitution?
The constitution is open to interpretation, therefore it does not carry a lot of weight. Plus it was written by a pretty awful generation of people.
Yes, the same system that made us the envy of the world for over 200 years suddenly needs revamping.
Purported “envy” is not a rational basis for anything serious and I reject it out of hand. That system, as good as it might have been for the first hundred years or so also resulted in a catastrophic civil war, massive government corruption and increasingly destructive regulatory burdens that are maintained directly by the two-party stranglehold on government. There is nothing in the Constitution that mandated or even encouraged the two-party system; and many of the Founders argued strongly against it. There is nothing in the Constitution that forbids the states from ensuring that any significant faction is able to select at least one Representative to represent them in the Congress and in the state legislature. So try again – sloganeering isn’t cutting it for you.
And yet, people flooding in across our borders are doing so for no apparent reason.
I don’t see many leaving.
I'm not really convinced that ranked-choice voting will fix things. Great Britain has it, after all, and look at the dumpster fire they have!
A major problem is that we have an entire Party in politics that is anti-American, and determined to force their will on Americans, whether they want it or not -- and the other Party is spineless and unwilling to stand up to the danger the first Party represents.
LMAO only a partisan would think like this. BOTH parties want their way or now. They want the power to implement it. Sounds anti American to me!
When you have a Party that hates the American flag, cuts off our energy independence at the knees the very first day they are able to do so, partner with big corporations to stifle free speech, and seek every way they can to take away guns from law-abiding American citizens, I think it's safe to say that it's anti-American.
They don't have ranked choice, just plurality. First past the post.
Indeed.
But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.
Lysander Spooner
I don't entirely buy that argument, because the Constitution is an ideal, and as words on paper, has no power on its own. Any government exists with the consent of the People, and so long as the People consent to unConstitutional government, that is what we are going to get.
There's no magic document that will prevent a tyranny, if the people don't care. If the people care enough, there's no need for a magic document. About the only use a magic document has, is for older generations to teach the newer generations the Ideal System, one that we inevitably fail to live up to -- and this is NOT something to sneeze at!
The people that wrote the fucking Constitution didn't even follow it. It is all BULLSHIT to make people feel good about who rules them.
First, as someone who is deeply steeped in not just the Constitution, but the logic and history of the document, I find that having a Constitution does not make me feel good about who rules me. When I think about how they use the Constitution as toilet paper, it rankles me. If that is, indeed, the purpose of the Constitution, it has failed miserably.
Second, I can't help but wonder: what mechanism do you propose to attempt to keep the Government within certain bounds, and to help future generations understand what their rights are, and what proper government should be?
America became a global power despite it's pathetic political system not because of it.
America was protected from the ravages of 2 world wars and abundant natural resources stolen from the native population after 8 million of them were brutally murdered.
The only hope...
There is no hope. The oligarchy is firmly in control and will be for a long time.
This, and repeal of the 17th
and 19th
and 16th
Yes, repealing the ability to raise taxes would pretty much bring an end to America.
Do it. Do it now.
Yes allowing women to vote is fundamentally anti-Libertarian and anti-American.
Yes. The American people can not be allowed to select their representatives in the senate. That choice must be returned to the political elites in the rabble.
My libertopia elects three representatives from each district, each of whom proxies the votes won; every voter can drop a name in a box, and one is chosen at random as a volunteer representative who proxies all the remaining votes. No primaries; one election with all candidates.
So you could end up with proxy counts of 30,000, 20,000, 10,000 for the three winners, and 50,000 for the volunteer if the voters are disgusted enough by the main candidates. Yes, it complicates tallying votes in the legislature, but even in quill and ink days it wouldn't have slowed things down much. It also makes it much harder to predict outcomes and game the system.
* It encourages people to vote.
* It encourages disenchanted protest votes for fringe candidates which end up with the volunteer, regardless of whether voters really like those fringe candidates.
* It encourages "centrist" candidates from the main parties to get as many votes as possible.
* The volunteers really shake things up. The old boy network might like to ignore their bills, but they have to be dealt with to pass bills.
No, the only hope is actually fighting back against totalitarian globalism.
They can crush resistance easily. It's too late for a rebellion.
Corporations are driving global governance.
Their governance over the globe.
It's a Libertarian Paradise.
Anyone who wants to be chief executive of a nation at this point in history is a fool - or a power-hungry politician. Nevertheless, principle could play a role in actually improving the social and economic climate in the UK now with a calm, steadfast hand at the helm. Rishi Sunak might be that person. I continue to be amazed that several decades of flawed demagogic leadership having produced the recent near-catastrophic situation very few politicians seem to have learned the lesson that it doesn't work and that sooner or later it will blow up in your face.
The UK, Europe, and the US are screwed: decades of bad government policy have seen to that. The citizens of those country are going to pay the price no matter who they elect.
Crashing the economy sooner rather than later is probably the better choice, but it is obviously political suicide.
my thought as well, if i were a member of a major party i would almost want to LOSE the next few election cycles since you know the electorate is going to blame whoever is in charge when things get really bad.
considering the nutbars the duopoly keeps putting up as candidates, one might almost think they agree with me
You are right, the U.S. the U.K are both dead. Killed by 50 years of Libertarian policies that were designed to destroy the will of the people, and replace it with global corporate rule, and the transfer of trillions of dollars of wealth from the poor and middle class to the wealthy.
Libertarianism has been pure poison at it's total failure, and the total failure of the two failed states that embraced it.
The world is laughing.
Fuck off, Nazi scum.
It probably has more to do with Putin than Friedman...
it doesn’t work
Depends on what the goal is. I would in general say, for example, that if you look at Joe Biden as a public servant he's been a miserable failure, but if you look at Joe Biden's goals as 'enriching Joe Biden,' he's actually done quite well.
"Anyone who wants to be chief executive of a nation at this point in history is a fool – or a power-hungry politician."
You seem to think these are mutually exclusive.
In a Democracy the people get the government they deserve.
Politicians don't care if it "works". They just want to get on the gravy train.
"Anyone who wants to be chief executive of a nation at this point in history is a fool – or a power-hungry politician"
Or both, as the last several presidents have demonstrated.
I wish that lady from Italy would resign. I heard she doesn't support the billionaire-funded idea that every developed country (except Israel) needs open borders. That makes her a FASCIST.
#ImmigrationAboveAll
Had to chuckle at billionaire-funded idea (and good to see you understand hyphenation).
I heard she was so paranoid about Tunis that she wouldn't even let Hannibal Burress perform in the country.
IMMIGRATION - Libertarian Party Platform
We hold that human rights should not be denied or abridged on the basis of nationality. We condemn massive roundups of Hispanic Americans and others by the federal government in its hunt for individuals not possessing required government documents. We strongly oppose all measures that punish employers who hire undocumented workers. Such measures repress free enterprise, harass workers, and systematically discourage employers from hiring Hispanics.
We welcome all refugees to our country and condemn the efforts of U.S. officials to create a new "Berlin Wall" which would keep them captive. We condemn the U.S. government's policy of barring those refugees from our country and preventing Americans from assisting their passage to help them escape tyranny or improve their economic prospects.
Undocumented non-citizens should not be denied the fundamental freedom to labor and to move about unmolested. Furthermore, immigration must not be restricted for reasons of race, religion, political creed, age, or sexual preference.
We therefore call for the elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a declaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered the country illegally.
Reason = "libertarians" for big government, centralized bureaucratic control, massive government spending (especially on welfare and wealth distribution programs), high tax burdens (especially on the middle class and small businesses but not so much on billionaires), and "Great Resets" where our personal possessions will be reset to us owning nothing and liking it.
And you fugazis wonder why people at the convention finally had enough and put the real libertarians in the form of the Mises Caucus back in control.
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i've had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.
Read all about it here..........>>> OnlineCareer1
Mikey needs a job but check his background out.
He is wound up tight. Possibly violent in a newsworthy way.
You replied (again) to a spam bot?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
I have rocks smarter than you.
H emanates to fuck children though.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a miserable TDS-addled pile of shit, a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
I remember libertarians! Weren't they the guys who were all about the gold standard, 2nd Amendment absolutism, and property rights?
I think they've been extinct for a couple of decades at least. Who the fuck are these bozos?
Those are settled issues.
Seriously.
It is all about immigration, cultural issues, and a point or two on the top marginal tax rate.
Eat shit and die, asshole.
This is as close as we'll ever get to seeing the fat ugly fucktard admit the truth, which is that he's good with the status quo.
The primary goal of all Libertarians is to destroy society through every means possible.
They aren't limited to the childishly ridiculous idea of returning to a gold standard.
lol British one-sided two-party system even worse than ours.
Truss couldn't support the weight of the empire.
hers was a buttress that truly would not quit
Brace for impact!
Went down harder than the Kerch bridge
Liz Truss - the shelf life of lettuce
saw the lettuce won.
The problem in the UK is high spending. It doesn’t matter much whether the spending is paid for through taxes or debt.
Yes, but higher taxes mask the problem of high spending temporarily.
But more borrowing let's you pretend you don't need to raise taxes or cut spending, temporarily.
Jesus, her tenure as prime minister was so young American teachers didn't even have time to groom it.
That didn't make any sense whatsoever.
Not trendy enough to support ?
It's called a "joke". I know leftists have a problem with that concept.
They’re not very bright. That’s why they’re leftists.
Joke
--Whoooosh!!-
You
Legal to abort in all 50 states.
Serious question, why does the government spend so much time wondering and asking my child what's going on in his or her pants? Like what is it about our children's genitalia that has teachers so worked up over, that if we stop them from talking about it... it's a human tragedy?
Do you actually have any children? Are they of school age?
lol how much for the children?
“ I want to buy your women... the little girl... your daughters. Sell them to me. Sell me your children.”
"They're not gonna catch us. We're on a mission from God."
There's a biblical quotation, "And Judas went out and hanged himself.".
And there's another, "Go thou and do likewise.".
Judges 20:48
The men of Israel turned back against the other Benjaminites and killed them with their swords—the entire city, the animals, and everything that remained. They also burned down all the cities that remained.
Now THAT'S how to win a war.
In advance of a vote yesterday on fracking—which Truss wants to legalize but many Conservative members of Parliament oppose—her administration threatened lawmakers who voted to block fracking with dismissal from the party.
It's become increasingly clear that, for the much of the world, the only path past the impending disaster is through it. Like their European neighbors, there's a good chance a lot of Brits will freeze in the dark this winter. And that's assuming the proxy war with Russia doesn't turn fusion hot. A lot of young people seem to have favorable views of the idea of depopulation. I don't know if they understand that they're the ones likely to be depopulated.
Maybe the Tories should have listened to the advice of Reason contributor, Brendan O'Neill
The Case for a Culture Warrior PM
Hey Reason, this is you, baby:
And the more politicians ignore it, or just chortle at it from the sidelines as so many Tories do, the worse it will get.
So, your beef with Reason is that they aren't taking Team Red's side in the stupid culture war?
The stupid part of the culture war is you democrats.
Get with it Mike, it’s not stupid, it’s trendy!
Americans only care about abortion and trannies, dude.
#GOPForever
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Reason stands by the Team Blue bench, waving pom-poms.
They keep describing these people [ That those seeking to divide Brits by race and gender and identity are not well-meaning progressives but are among the most pernicious people in public life today. ] as well-meaning progressives, because they keep peppering their articles with such positive descriptors as:
Diversity is good. Anti-racism means well, etc.
The culture war consists of the left constantly inflicting it’s deviancy on the rest of America through government force. If you want it to end, leave people alone. Or else.
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i've had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.
Read all about it here..........>>> OnlineCareer1
So Truss resigns because there are too many Green radicals in the allegedly Conservative Party. There is no hope for the UK.
There's no hope for England. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland might separate and muddle through.
You say that, but she got flushed in just six weeks and they get to try again. Biden's with us for a hard four, assuming he lives that long.
Those radicals do not become less important because of this.
Assuming he's alive now.
Maybe Fatass Donnie and Dick Cheney had it right all along.
Cut taxes on people like Warren Buffett and Mark Zuckerberg without a single spending cut, then blow the deficit up more with $1400 checks to everyone and PPP for all your cronies, watch inflation get set on fire, then plot a coup when voters reject that policy.
#ReaganProvedDeficitsDon'tMatter
Fuck off and die, TDS-addled scumbag liar.
You’re a soulless deviant predator.
#shrikeshouldcommitsuicide
Spiked Podcast on this local story. Trigger warning: Brendan O'Neill.
Wait! A Fiona article and she neglected to demand we take in Truss as a refuge? What's the world coming to?
I'm sure it's just an oversight on her part. Maybe we'll see it in a later correction.
Not Truss but the millions of Britons impacted by her actions and the billion or so traumatized as part of the history of colonization. She's slipping.
A least she had better hair than Boris - - - - - - - - -
That's what Joe said
What? Boris has awesome hair.
Why is anyone surprised?
The Tories didn't get where they are by being ardent Reagenites. They convinced the people that, unlike Labour, they would defend their entitlements and protect the middle class. It certainly helps that Labour, much like Democracts, have told the middle to fuck off.
The UK is 10 years ahead of us, politically speaking. TERF's and the anti-trans feminists started over the pond, after all.
I'm disappointed Liz Truss turned out to be no kind of Iron Lady. She should have told everybody, in no uncertain terms, to fuck off. But maybe she realized after her own party rejected the idea of fracking that the Sun was indeed setting on the British Empire and it was a lost cause trying to stop it. Maybe the Muslims will have better luck trying to run the place.
> "borrowing your way out of inflation isn't a plan"
How about printing your way out? Helicoptering your way out? Come on England, Biden needs some pointers!
I think the “globalist coup” narrative makes the most sense in trying to explain the bumblefuck. Truss was either a Trojan horse or Patsy. Like Boris, doing the exact opposite of what actual conservative voters wanted. Hunt, The new Chancellor appears to be exactly the sort of Chinese asset with a lockdown hard-on you expect in Europe at this point. And the whole implosion hinged on a proposed 1% decrease in tax.
I guess this how things will look when we have a defacto one party system. Which will probably become apparent the second a “red wave” amounts to fuck all (on the national level anyway).
A genuine insurrection (not the phony Democrat hyped kind) by the globalists and climate alarmists who were afraid that Liz Truss would deliver affordable energy to the grubby hoi-polloi. The proles have to suffer to build the kind of world the elites are dreaming of.
She was not deposed; she resigned after learning from the chair of the 1922 Committee that her party was no longer behind her.
Do you know what the 1922 Committee is? Do you care?
This is a predictable result of affirmative action hiring.
She was the third white, woman PM in recent UK history. "Affirmative action" would have selected the first Asian PM in UK history.
Obviously.
Lettuce rejoice that Truss will not romaine the UK prime minister.
She was certainly no Ceaser.
Truss is to the UK as the iceberg was to the Titanic.
Her party knew what she was when it elected her. Ignorance is, in this case, not a very convincing excuse.
Fiscal insanity is what got Truss turfed. The financial sector has figured out that her Libertarian policies were pure poison and would bring an end to her country.
Don't quit your day job.
It’s time to look back on all the happy times and fun things you have done in the past.
Because you won’t be doing them in the future.
More like roadkill on the information superhighway.
Sure, but politicians aren't supposed to be serious about what the claim to support.
She was put in place by the wrong people and sabotaged by all the right people according to the remainer marxist collaborators in her own party.
Do you have another final solution Geiger?
Is that a yes?