Tom Cotton Says Biden's Marijuana Pardon Recipients Pleaded Down From More Serious Charges
In fact, most were caught on federal property with small amounts of pot.

Surprising no one, Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.) was not a big fan of President Joe Biden's announcement yesterday that he was pardoning several thousand people convicted of simple possession of marijuana.
"In the midst of a crime wave and on the brink of a recession, Joe Biden is giving blanket pardons to drug offenders—many of whom pled down from more serious charges," Cotton tweeted. "This is a desperate attempt to distract from failed leadership."
In the midst of a crime wave and on the brink of a recession, Joe Biden is giving blanket pardons to drug offenders—many of whom pled down from more serious charges.
This is a desperate attempt to distract from failed leadership.
— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) October 6, 2022
You may remember Cotton as the senator who complains that America has an "under-incarceration" problem and who tries to torpedo even the most modest criminal justice reforms. He also eats birthday cake every day.
Setting aside the Chicken Little caterwauling about pardoning pot offenders when crime is rising, Cotton's claim that many of those pardon recipients pleaded down to simple possession from more serious crimes is outlandish.
A 2016 report by the U.S. Sentencing Commission found that most people charged by the feds with simple possession are either caught coming over the U.S.-Mexico border with small amounts, or caught on federal property, such as a military base, national park, or Veterans Affairs facility. They often bumble their way onto a federal prosecutor's caseload, rather than being the target of federal law enforcement. The median sentence for a border offender was six months in prison, while most non-border offenders received probation and a fine.
As law blogger Ken White noted, it's practically unheard of for someone to plead down to simple possession from more serious drug crimes.
https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1578118576979865600
The reason is fairly simple: A U.S. Attorney's Office won't waste its time bargaining down just to get a simple possession conviction. Federal prosecutors don't have a problem squeezing guilty pleas out of drug defendants. Only 2 percent of federal criminal defendants went to trial in 2018, for example. It would be like punting for field position on 2nd down.
But Cotton only plays one note, and he doesn't play it particularly well.
In completely unrelated news, a September poll of prospective Arkansas voters found 58.5 percent were in favor of legalizing recreational marijuana, 29 percent were against, and 12.5 percent were undecided.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ken White has had 25 year federal criminal career?
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article.. https://becomeamillionaire99.blogspot.com/
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! i do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able Has to start working from home right away. This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://jobopportunity22.blogspot.com
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able Has to start working from home right away. This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE.......>>> OnlineCareer1
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-18] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://workopportunity23.blogspot.com
Technically so have some of the people pardoned
Hope he's better at that then...whatever the Hell he does that gets Reason so aroused.
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-17] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://workopportunity23.blogspot.com
Uh oh. Reason is saying mean things about a Republican without the requisite mean things about a Democrat to balance it out. You know what that means.....
“He also eats birthday cake every day.”
Luckily this statement was included (with a link!) so there’s nothing else to criticize this article for.
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, [rea-01] I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
Uh oh. Sarcasmic is trying to drunkenly troll the board again.
Tom Cotton needs a woodchipper.
Maybe the J6 rioters / trespassers should have carried a little weed on them.
Probably. I know when I've some weed on me I avoid speeding, I use my turn signals, and say yes sir when speaking to cops. That's pothead 101. I certainly don't storm into government buildings.
And you stay within the velvet ropes while storming.
I heard that the J6 rioters (would-be democracy thieves egged on by Der TrumpfenFuhrer and by fellow Trumpanzees gone apeshit) were actually planning a genocide of tens of millions of EVIL Demo-Craps, Lizard People, and other vote thieves, and they down-pleaded to mere charges of insurrection, instead...
Don’t fear the revolt!
(insurrection)!
All our times have come
Here, but now they’re gone
Seasons don’t fear the revolt
Nor do the wind, the sun, or the rain
(We can be like they are)
Come on, baby
(Don’t fear the revolt)
Baby, take my hand
(Don’t fear the revolt)
We’ll be able to fly
Baby, I’m your man
La, la la, la la
La, la la, la la
Valentine is done
Here but now they’re gone
Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbs
Are together in eternity
(Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbitt)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_Wessel
Horst and Babbs both wanted to grab political power through violence, and got back, what they were dishing out. Karma is a bitch! Live by the sword, die by the sword!
But Cotton only plays one note, and he doesn't play it particularly well.
Eh, I don't know about that. When I listen to him talk he's one of the more wonkish and serious Senators. I just disagree with him on a lot of stuff.
Also, I'm confused about the birthday cake comment. Unclear to me on whether that's meant as a bad thing.
“Also, I’m confused about the birthday cake comment.”
Just standard objective reporting by Reason about a Republican.
If it is an insult, it doesn't matter if it's partisan or not, it's a confusing shot.
Which, to repeat, isn't a defense of whatever Tom Cotton said. But the article is a diatribe against a tweet, with a little insult because he has a vague amount of whimsy in his life. I don't know. I just always want Reason to be better, and they're just petty little shitheels so often.
Why do you expect reason to be better?
"Want" not "expect".
I agree it was a confusing shot. But the motivation behind it was completely partisan.
I see the daily cake statement as a failed attempt to suggest the healthy, skinny senator has a gluttonous vice that is equal to drug possession.
CJ is wrong, as usual. There’s nothing simple or minor about drug trafficking. No park or border cop is going to bother with someone holding a joint or a baggie of marijuana.
People so charged are typically carrying far more than enough to demand an officer conduct an arrest. These are defendants who were such scum that prosecutors didn’t toss their cases, despite the possibility of a trial and a jury acquittal.
So Cotton is right. These are almost all criminals who have already gotten lucky. They don’t deserve to have a drug addict-enabler pardoning them.
A lot of supposition. Can you name one of these 'scum' and the details of the case that led to their conviction? Whether one joint or one ounce or one pound, who was the VICTIM whose injuries 'demanded' the federal police make an arrest?
If I were to cheat on my taxes, there wouldn't be any victims either. Are you going to legalize tax fraud as well? Until you push for that as hard as you do for drug legalization, you can go to hell.
I'll be the first to stand up in support of tax fraud.
So what government action could this argument not justify?
Collecting taxes is arguably, to most libertarians who aren't anarchists, a legitimate function of government. Government needs to fund itself somehow. So on the assumption that government is a necessary public good (which is not necessarily one I make), there are victims of tax fraud, just not very direct ones.
It's the 90s. You criticize Democrats on policy details. But you LOL at Republicans. If you can't find something to LOL at them about, you dig until you find something.
In fact, most were caught on federal property with small amounts of pot.
Why weren't they shot for tresspassing?
If a bear trespasses onto my property at a safe distance, snorfling for grubs, I will NOT shoot him or her, even if said bear is carrying a little pot! IF, on the other hand, the bear CHARGES me... And I do NOT mean, with a credit card... Then that bear, armed or unarmed the bear may be... Now bear with me... I will SHOOT DEAD, that damned bear!!!
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/theres-word-what-trumpism-becoming/619418/
There’s a Word for What Trumpism Is Becoming
The relentless messaging by Trump and his supporters has inflicted a measurable wound on American democracy.
From above…
“The conversion of Ashli Babbitt into a martyr, a sort of American Horst Wessel, expresses the transformation. Through 2020, Trump had endorsed deadly force against lawbreakers: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” he tweeted on May 29, 2020. Babbitt broke the law too, but not to steal a TV. She was killed as she tried to disrupt the constitutional order, to prevent the formalization of the results of a democratic election.”
Well, also Saint Babbitt was unarmed, they say... To this I say...
What utter bullshit! A lion, tiger, or bear charges you, having NO weapons other than their body parts... Just as "un-armed" as Saint Babbitt... Are you, or are you NOT gonna shoot said predator, if you have a gun? If I beat the shit out of you, with my fists, shall I be forgiven, 'cause I was... unarmed?
My GAWD you (Saint Babbitt Worshitters) fascists are illogical!!!
Do people often refer to you as "special"??
I'd hate to think that being clear-eyed, rational, and data-driven is in any way "special". But maybe it is! Maybe in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man will eventually be King!
But the troglodytes are known to kill the kings, in a certain category! THAT is why I treasure my anonymity! (If I might make you FEEL bad, by being a better person than you are, then... Bad feelings are BAD! Those who cause bad feelings are BAD!!! Let us KILL SQRLSY One, who make us feel bad, and is, therefor, BAD!) http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ for data-driven PROOF of this!
You resent the hell out of the fact that many other people are flat-out, better, more honest people than you are, right? More “live and let live”, and WAAAY less authoritarian?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-love-and-war/201706/why-some-people-resent-do-gooders
From the conclusion to the above…
These findings suggest that we don’t need to downplay personal triumphs to avoid negative social consequences, as long as we make it clear that we don’t look down on others as a result.
SQRLSY back here now… So, I do NOT want you to feel BAD about YOU being an authoritarian asshole, and me NOT being one! PLEASE feel GOOD about you being an authoritarian asshole! You do NOT need to push me (or other REAL lovers of personal liberty) down, so that you can feel better about being an asshole! EVERYONE ADORES you for being that authoritarian asshole that you are, because, well, because you are YOU! FEEL that self-esteem, now!
A "yes" would have sufficed.
OK then, yes, the clear-eyed, rational, and data-driven person is pretty "special" around here! "Feelings" and the "best" insults RULE, all around, otherwise!
What's it like to have the whole world hate you, Sqrlsy?
What’s it like to hate (almost the entire) whole world full of people who are better humanoids than You are, Oh Perfect EvilBahnFuhrer? "Do-gooder derogation" is a VERY real thing, and it is driven by cesspools full of EVIL such as Your Perfect Self!
I think that federal property can also mean a national park or forest.
Tom Cotton is a drawling, bigoted, jug-eared, authoritarian, torture-promoting, obsolete asshole -- and a prominent Republican, beloved by clingers and other deplorable culture war casualties.
Arthur, be nice. Senator Cotton did serve in the military.
So what? This asshole endorses torture and appeases slavery. He cuddles mercenaries and war criminals. He's a character-deprived, right-wing asshole. America was losing wars before Cotton showed up and he did nothing to approve the situation. This worthless piece of shit also lied about his military record to try to make himself look better. He also has spent most of his adult life sucking at the taxpayer teat, one way or another.
He's a natural candidate in a can't-keep-up backwater like Arkansas, though. Those half-educated bigot find a fossilized piece of shit just dreamy.
All hail the adjective king.
If they couldn't prove the more serious charges, or couldn't be bothered, then either the more serious charges were not proven, prosecutors aren't doing their job well, or are incompetent. In any case, these people still shouldn't be in prison.
Possession crimes are popular with law enforcement, because they are low hanging fruit. No need to prove anything I give a shit about, like actually harming other people.
I think this is one of the reasons they LOVE LOVE LOVE gun possession charges.
You should see the penalties for not paying my taxes. And not paying my taxes wouldn't harm other people either.
Which is why it's not a real crime.
Yeah, I tend to agree. I haven't looked at the data though on who was released. I don't actually trust Reason or Popehat particularly. I'm also too lazy to do the research though, so I just remain neutral on this.
Given that most federal criminal laws shouldn't exist, or should be applied in far fewer cases, I'm OK with calling it all bullshit. As is the prosecutorial strategy of getting people to plead to lesser charges because they are easier to prove. If someone should be in prison because they actually victimized someone, then you need to convict them of that crime. The complaints should be about the lazy prosecutors not doing their jobs properly, not the changes to cannabis policy.
Nobody was released.
Well, maybe somebody, but the vast, vast, vast majority are already out of prison and just getting a retroactive pardon.
That's the whole point. To look like you're doing something big so you can buy the stoner vote for the election (and I'm now convinced that half of Reason is 'the stoner vote') but not anything that alters the actual landscape one iota.
Hold all calls, please, we have a winner!
Yes, winner, winner, chicken dinner!!!
^this. exactly
Could any of you guys point me to a libertarian site, or at least a site that attracts some libertarian commenters?
Thank you.
No defendant gets the smallest marijuana charge applied unless they’re such jerks or carrying more serious weight.
If they truly had less, border or park cops would have let them walk.
If they truly had less, an AUSA wouldn’t have bothered to bring the charge, knowing it’s possible to get a jury acquittal.
Cotton is right. These criminals got lucky that a federal cop or prosecutor already gave them mercy. They don’t deserve more from a drug enabling president who hasn’t even examined the individual cases.
Prove they are guilty of greater crimes. That's literally the rules.
Yeah, that's not mercy, it's laziness or incompetence. Giving people more lenient sentences than what they deserve for actual crimes against people is not a positive thing.
Also, most of those "most serious" charges are overblown bullshit that only exist to give the prosecutors leverage to get plea deals.
Breaking: Nick Rekeita is back on Youtube.
Sounds like a government problem to me.
Crazy idea, maybe the government should repeal those laws? Last time I checked, the president's party controls the house and senate
Shapiro repeated this BS today on his podcast.
Step one to a solution. If a plee deal is offered, that automatically becomes the highest maximum scentance
this is a fantastic idea. A band aid over a bigger problem but still a great idea.
He sounds like an idiot talking about drug crimes which aren't objective crimes.
"guilty until proven" innocent. It's not just for your friends you fuckwit
Surprise, surprise, surprise! Who could ever have guessed that elected officials would make stuff up, ignore actual facts, or use disinformation as a campaign slogan? It's a little bit more surprising, I guess, that Tom would ignore the opinions of his constituents in promoting his policy position on a major issue like the War on Drugs, but actually not all that surprising. Maybe in this case it's all about bashing your opponents in the culture wars.
Picking on Cotton? Sounds racist to me!
Sounds like Tom Cotton never met a person he would not lock up.
Less than Kamala Harris...