Give Biden Credit for Bolstering Private Refugee Resettlement
Uniting for Ukraine, a program providing private support to displaced Ukrainians, has proved more effective than the government's own resettlement efforts.

In April, President Joe Biden announced that the U.S. would welcome up to 100,000 Ukrainian refugees out of the millions who have fled their country since Russia invaded last February. But visa backlogs and processing inefficiencies in federal immigration agencies meant there were few existing migration pathways that offered Ukrainian refugees quick and effective escape routes.
In response to concerns about the refugee logjam, Biden announced Uniting for Ukraine, a program that allows private organizations and individuals to apply for the chance to financially support displaced Ukrainians and help them integrate into their communities. Sponsored Ukrainians may stay and work in the U.S. for two years.
As of late July, nearly 30,000 Ukrainians had come to the U.S. through Uniting for Ukraine. By comparison, the federal government resettled just over 11,000 refugees in all of fiscal year 2021. At a time of sudden mass displacement, a decentralized volunteer program has proven to be a better system for refugee resettlement than centralized government planning.
Canada, which has allowed private refugee resettlement since 1979, offers a good case study. Research from the Niskanen Center, a D.C.-based think tank, indicates that 70 percent of privately sponsored refugees in Canada secured employment within a year of arriving, compared to 40 percent of government-sponsored refugees.
These favorable results come from giving private citizens a stake in the success of the refugees they sponsor. Since individuals and organizations are financially responsible for refugees, they have "an incentive to quickly find them employment and economic independence," the Migration Policy Institute noted in a 2021 report on Canada's system.
While refugees who arrive through government-led pathways often enter communities as strangers, privately sponsored refugees arrive knowing the people who have volunteered to help them. Sponsors can harness their local knowledge to connect new arrivals with job opportunities, friends, and social activities.
In a February 2021 executive order, Biden listed private refugee resettlement as a priority for his administration's immigration policy. He deserves credit for recognizing that refugees benefit when the government unleashes the enthusiasm and financial resources of private citizens.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "The Advantages of Private Refugee Resettlement."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Then we also need to give Governors DeSantis and Abbott credit for “Bolstering Private Refugee Resettlement”. Oh wait, that would be in the US not Ukraine, and Republican governors not Democrats so we must criticize the same thing now.
Not only that but their un-sponsored illegal immigrants get to stay in the US forever, not for only two years.
In response to concerns about the refugee logjam, Biden announced Uniting for Ukraine, a program that allows private organizations and individuals to apply for the chance to financially support displaced Ukrainians and help them integrate into their communities.
You do understand the difference between private individuals using their own resources to willingly assist migrants, and state governments spending public money to transport migrants into the care of unwilling individuals?
Showered with any little girls lately?
So honest. So so honest.
Didn’t answer I see.
You mean, I didn't answer the bad-faith question that a right-wing troll asked me in order to deflect on behalf of his right-wing buddies, the same one who claims to be devoted to honesty? No, I didn't answer that question, why would I? It's not like it is a serious question after all.
So that’s a yes?
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [rea-02] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
Reminder. Jeff can call anyone a right wing member. He is allowed. But don't dare call him the leftist shit he is.
Why are you so personally offended whenever anyone says "Boo" about right-wingers and Trumpaloos?
It's almost as if you take it personally as if you were called out by name. And your reaction is to call people out by name, even if you weren't specifically mentioned. You take a general statement personally, then wage personal attacks.
It would be one thing if the people you attack by name were constantly attacking you by name, but they're not. They're criticizing the right in general.
I work from home providing various internet services for an hourly rate of $80 USD. I never thought it would be possible, but my trustworthy friend (aps-06) persuaded me to take the opportunity after Hav telling me how she quickly earned 13,000 dollars in just four weeks while working on the greatest project. Go to this article for more information.
…..
——————————>>> Here is I started,,,,,,, https://rb.gy/ryqczj
Governments can be bad or good. He is merely pointing out that DeSantis did something of comparable or greater virtue, which is very rare for governments, and Reason treated him very differently.
Good if some people do it, bad if others do it. Got it.
Oh, and most of those "unwilling individuals" live in self-declared sanctuary towns.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/sep/27/peggy-hubbard/least-three-marthas-vineyard-towns-adopted-sanctua/
Cite on whatever DeSantis did to bolster private refugee resettlement?
I love the move from sealioning with conversation to asking for constant citations. Keep up the good fight against all these reasonistas spreading misinformation and disinformation.
Insufferable, uninteresting, repetitive cunt.
How precious. You do know those agreements don't cover 100% of all costs a refugee has on the system. Your ignorance is precious though.
He does not. Intentionally.
So chemjeff, it’s OK for the federal government to spend taxpayer money to send hundreds of illegal aliens to scattered small communities but not OK for inundated border states to do likewise? https://nypost.com/2022/10/05/dozens-of-migrant-kids-flown-to-new-york-by-biden/amp/
Sure, we could give them credit, IF you can explain what they did to bolster private refugee resettlement.
this article very knowledgeable
So now the bots are praising each other?
It beats Reason editors praising the Brandon administration.
Praise Biden and condemn DeSantis and Abbott? The latter two helped move migrants/refugees out of areas where there is less help for them (due to Biden letting them in and then moving them around at night). Fiona, is it because these refugees are white and not brown? Is it because they wouldn't affect your property values? Is it because they wouldn't cause your proggie friends to show off what NIMBYs they are?
due to Biden letting them in and then moving them around at night
"letting them in" = agreeing to international treaties which grant migrants the liberty to request asylum at a port of entry.
"moving them around at night" = transporting unaccompanied minors to family members and agencies with whom the government contracts to take care of the unaccompanied minors which the government is legally obligated to take care of, and doing so in a manner that is minimally disruptive to ordinary commercial air travel
Other than that, yeah you're totally right
grant migrants the liberty to request asylum at a port of entry
They have no right to asylum if they have come from another country in which they are not at risk.
Is there a specific instance of that happening that you would like to cite?
Keep fighting for their rights, Mikey.
Wait, are you requesting a cite for when an asylum seeker's claim is not approved?
Sure, why not. That is not asking someone to prove a negative. It is very well possible such a denial of asylum was documented in a news story or something.
If it has actually happened; i.e. if BigT wasn’t just being up a hypothetical scenario. And if it hasn’t actually happened, why did BigT bring it up as if it were relevant to the conversation?
Heck, I just googled and found a story about some asylum seekers being denied, just haven’t found any stories where they were denied by the US specifically because they “have come from another country in which they are not at risk.”
Vast majority of them do not meet the legal definition of refugees. You conveniently skip that part.
It is amazing how many times you can be told how international asylum claims work, how one can't country shop. Yet you keep making the same mistake.
You so remain ignorant to the low rates of adjudicated asylum claims.
It is almost like you're promoting fraudulent use of asylum claims.
It's the leftist playbook of feigning ignorance to uphold overly-simplistic, reductionist logic.
Sure, that’s an exclusively leftist thing yo do.
This is a stretch. Biden's policy is actually aimed to help refugees and possibly not seeking publicity. The other was a publicity stunt that had no consideration for the well being of the refugees, but only done for political motives.
We can argue about the merits of either, but to equate the two? Then the gravy on the potatoes is the accusation of racism right out of the leftist playbook.
What other, the declaration of sanctuary city status with zero intention of backing it up?
Biden's policy is all about PR and Fiona's adoration of it is purely her open borders zealotry for which she will see no negative consequences. Fuck these self-absorbed naive narcissists.
What other, the declaration of sanctuary city status with zero intention of backing it up?
Yeah, De Santis made a good point. And Fiona can support Biden's policy while opposing De Santis' move without being a hypocrite or racist.
Biden is continually letting illegal aliens flood across the border who are not escaping a war - they merely want a more affluent way of life. Ukrainian refugees are fleeing a war zone - there were relatively none before the war started. Biden should be impeached and tried for treason for purposefully failing to enforce existing immigration laws and allowing the invasion of our country along its southern border. Of course, we know that the feckless party will never have the guts to do this, even if they manage to take both houses in the mid-terms.
My grandfather came over from Salicia which was mostly kinda Polish but got sucked into Ukraine by Stalin and Hitler back in the day. Lots of Russians, Polocks, Ukrainians and every other Eastern Europeans in my business. They are almost to a person assholes. I'd rather hang out with Venezuelans.
Fuck Joe Biden anyway.
Right-wing commenters: The real solution to refugees would be to permit private individuals to sponsor them.
Biden: Let's let private individuals sponsor refugees!
Right-wing commenters: Fuck you, what I really want is whatever the right-wing politicians say
Does it get frustrating, jeff? Being the most principled libertarian commenter on a site where so many others fail to meet your standards of purity?
Don't lose hope! Maybe one day everyone here will be the kind of libertarian who approvingly links to essays about how we need to root for DARK BRANDON to SAVE DEMOCRACY.
#LibertariansForBiden
Reminder. Jeff can call everyone else right wing but don't you dare call him the leftist shit that he is.
Reminder: If you criticize the right then you are a leftist.
If you only criticize the right, even if you claim (and think) you must do this to achieve some sort of collective balance, then you are a leftist.
You seriously believe that? Criticism of one thing does not equal support for another. That is a logical fallacy. Most of my criticism of the right is rooted in disappointment. The right used to be the people who respond while the left would react. The right used to be the team of thinkers while the left ran on emotion. The right used to have the moral high ground while the left didn't even pretend to have morals. But that is no longer the case. In those respects there is little difference between teams. That is my criticism of the right. And that is hardly support for the left. Quite the opposite. My criticism of the right is based upon how they are becoming more and more like the left.
Shorter version: Shame on you, righty-tighties, you've become what you hate.
OMG, the Right has adopted so many practices that used to be associated with the Left:
- Making a profit is evil: The anti-COVID vaccine talking point that there is something suspect about the vaccines because corporations are making profits off of the vaccines.
- Police and courts are keeping us down: When they are arresting and prosecuting conservative rioters, even when the conservative rioters video’d themselves in the act and proudly posted the videos on social media.
- Redefining words: it is now “censorship” when a private party doesn’t want to host your speech on their site on their dime.
I never looked at it that way, but you are exactly right. I mean correct. I mean astute observation. Yeah, that's it.
Speaking of the COVID, Ringo has caught it. 🙁
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/ringo-starr-postpones-two-shows-sick-1234603903/
(And you better believe that I very intentionally chose Rolling Stone, which I never, ever claimed not to read, for my cite. Totally apropos in this case.)
Only leftists cite Rolling Stone.
I had little choice. Sadly, Breitbart doesn’t cover concert tour news.
Sadly, Breibart doesn’t cover concert tour news
Pretty sure RS doesn’t either, unless it’s some important Boomer crap like Bob Dylan’s farewell tour, or rumors of an Eagles reunion.
Sadly, Breitbart doesn’t cover concert tour news.
You're only allowed to complain about what is not covered if what is not covered means the one not covering it is a leftist.
Most definitely. Agree that Rolling Stone is an out of touch magazine for old farts.
What a rambling article. He canceled because of COVID but doesn't have COVID and they wish everyone the best what the...
And if you clearly support the left and constantly regurgitate their talking points, that's usually a tell.
You might have a point if "clearly support the left" actually meant "saying things in favor of the left."
But it doesn't.
"Clearly support the left" simply means "said mean things about the right boo hoo he must be a leftist waaah he hates Trump and voted for Biden waaah he's got TDS he's so mean waaaah let's all get together and call him names waaah so mean."
Here’s the problem. Like a “stopped clock”, every once in a whole the Left is correct about something.
So, a sane, non-partisan making a reasoned, personally-original observation regarding a current event will line up with a Left “talking point”.
Examples: Ashley Babbit’s shooting was justified. No credible evidence of significant election fraud has been presented in a court of law.
By the way, everything I say is also true vice versa. Examples: a sane, non-partisan might observe that Democrats overspend like crazy, or that attempts at cancelation by whole culture is wrong.
Are we supposed to honk a horn or ring a bell when we are in agreement with these guys?
It’s like if you want to say something critical of their team, you have to come up with a criticism of the other team to balance it out. Even if you do that then it’s BOAF SIDEZ. No matter what, criticism of their team equals support for the other.
That’s just how they think. Can’t change it.
Actually, I think I’ll start doing that. There are comments here every day by conservatives that I agree with, and I often say nothing because I agree with them and so there’s nothing to say.
But maybe I should comment “HONK!” to signal agreement.
Try it. I'll watch.
Huh, I haven’t been able to find a honk-worthy comment. I agree with some of this comment, but don’t agree that Newsom is being evil. Seems like he is more well-meaning but misguided to me:
https://reason.com/2022/10/04/the-advantages-of-private-refugee-resettlement/?comments=true#comment-9731182
And there were some comments about Kamala Harris on the morning links thread, but I couldn’t honk just because I have some minor quibbles with the comments.
Are we supposed to honk a horn or ring a bell when we are in agreement with these guys?
Yes. Because they are insecure and have a persecution complex. So unless they get constant validation for their beliefs, they lash out in rage against the people who aren't giving them continual validation.
Dumbass Ukrainians, all you have to do is fly to Mexico and walk across the border and there are a bunch of NGO's that will give you all kinds of free shit. No need to go through all the hassle of finding a sponsor or dealing with the bureaucracy.
Until some frustrated Americans start to lay mines at the southern border.
Or until the cartels start shooting them in the back for not paying them a convenience fee.
Of course Biden deserves credit for this. In fact Biden's enthusiasm for bringing cost-effective foreign-born labor to the US is the most important reason why Koch-funded libertarians wanted him to win. 🙂
#OpenTheBordersToHelpCharlesKoch
#CheapLaborAboveAll
How many lines of code run the Fiona-bot? Besides a calendar counter, and a random media sampler for recent events, how hard is it to generate a few paragraphs endorsing open borders and praising immigration?
She’s the Mad Libs of dumb ideas.
Newsom welcomes immigrants as well....
....minors wanting sex change operations and he is anxious to take them away from their parents.
Newsom signs bill allowing state to revoke out-of-state parent’s rights over trans kids
https://www.thecentersquare.com/california/newsom-signs-bill-allowing-state-to-revoke-out-of-state-parent-s-rights-over-trans/article_c7375720-40e6-11ed-9fc5-53bfacc72ff4.html?utm_source=thecentersquare.com&utm_campaign=%2FOhio%2Flists%2Ft2%2Fohio%2F&utm_medium=email&utm_content=headline
You can't make this stuff up.
Could he be more evil?
Hey, Jeff and mike! I would think ^ would be worth a “honk”, no?
The only credit Biden deserves is his decision to choose Harris as his running mate, as he knew his Democrat handlers would never replace him with her.
I’m surprised the party let him get away with that. Other than the virtue signal it puts the party’s future in jeopardy. A different VP could take over at any time.
They legit couldn't see what a liability she was until she began publicly fucking up as VP in ways even they couldn't ignore. They totally intended to 25th Biden, but even they have had to acknowledge that Harris would be worse. The people on the left I know are so racist that they honestly believed the only reason anyone objected to Harris was that she was a strong, intelligent black woman. If only...and even now, many of them try to explain away her many catastrophes as media bias.
What a lot of laughs we’re all in for when Harris runs in 2024 with “Children-who-need-to-transition-sanctuary-state” Newsom as her VP.
Until they win the election.
I can’t imagine Newsom accepting the sidekick role in that ticket.
I'm getting bumper stickers made up for the Bided-Harris 2024 re-election campaign:
Joe & The whore in '24
Or the Ebonics version:
Joe & The Ho' in twenty foe
I’ve got to disagree. The Democrat handlers might be looking to Harris now as a better choice for the party’s future than keeping Biden in the big chair.
Harris is a terrible impromptu public speaker, but she’s been a literal political whore long enough to know how the game is played.
If she has to assume the presidency, she would step up, check the direction of the wind, and do whatever is needed for the party.
She would hire someone competent to manage the day-to-day, fire Biden’s minders, and never give an impromptu speech again.
Her history is of minimal competency, not disaster. I’m sure I’d find much to dislike about her remaining years in the WH, but she’d be a much better choice for the democrats.
And I think they know that.
I'm surprised Fiona isn't praising putin for creating so many opportunities for immigration.
More seriously, if this is such a great solution then why hasn't it been the go-to over unfettered open borders from the start? More like this is one Democrat hack doing all she can to praise her team and this is all she's got, a refutation of her every other stance.
Fiona should be condemning bringing Ukrainian refugees to the US because we're depriving struggling countries like Moldova and Hungary of the economic and cultural benefits of mass immigration.
Why should I?
Furthermore, why are charities wasting their money on Ukrainians? Because Putin?
“wasting their money on Ukrainians”?
Please explain further how they are wasting their money.
What does CRT have to say about Biden allowing more racist oppressors into the Country?
All Ukrainians are “racist oppressors”? Please expound on this claim.
No actual human can be this stupid.
Oh, they sure can be.
I sure hope nobody misspelled any last names.
Anyone who gives Biden credit for anything is a leftist. Period.
Especially if it’s the Reason staff. They all read the New York Times and voted for Biden!
now do how B's forcing a war with Russia
To reverse and paraphrase an Orwellianism, Eurasia has always been at war with the rest of us.
lol I like it.
Research from the Niskanen Center, a D.C.-based think tank, indicates that 70 percent of privately sponsored refugees in Canada secured employment within a year of arriving, compared to 40 percent of government-sponsored refugees.
This sounds like a bit of a bait and switch. Was the private Canadian resettlement truly private, or the subcontracted function of a government program. If the former, then it tells us precious little about the administration's resettlement program. Someone sponsoring their cousin to come into the country, and taking responsibility for them while they're here, is fundamentally different from an NGO getting a stipend for each immigrant "processed" by getting them plugged in to a host of other government programs.
I'll give traitor Joe credit for being a senile piece of shit who should have retired twenty years ago. OK?
“traitor Joe”?
I haven’t heard that one before. What act of treason did he commit?
By not protecting our national sovereignty and defending our international borders. By not enforcing our immigration laws as he swore to do in his constitutional oath and allowing millions of third world scum to just walk across our borders unopposed. SHAMEFUL!
By using his son to sell his political influence to the Chicoms and taking kickbacks from them.
This is how weak nations die; this is how failed states are created, from within.
If the Republicans take back the House, he needs to be impeached ASAP to show the Democrats that the sword swings both ways. Traitor Joe in an unmitigated disaster by any objective measure
OK, all illegal immigrants are scum. There’s never one or two who turn out to be pretty decent human beings?
No, but many of them are. You get a lot more of that with no screening.
Better headline:
Give Biden Discredit for his ineffective resettlement efforts.
This article only focuses on one aspect of Biden's immigration policy, which is less than 5% of immigration this year. Why don't they apply it to the rest of the immigrants, create a line, build a wall, and let them in as private charities (not funded by the government, and note the author failed to research the question, and I'll tell you they are mostly government funded as you can determine from their IRS 990 filings) are willing to accept and support them until they are able to take care of themselves?
Further, the government should stop forcing taxpayers to fund immigrants.
Because it is perfectly consistent with libertarian philosophy to praise someone for finding a private, non-government solution to a problem, especially when that person is typically a supporter of big government; and Reason is a libertarian magazine.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
Is it just me with the coming Holidays on the brain, or does that picture look like a blurred out Will Farrell as Buddy The Elf? 🙂
"Give Biden Credit for Bolstering Private Refugee Resettlement"
Well, let's be honest and give credit to whomever wrote the thing and told droolin' Joe to sign it.
Now, will you give credit to Trump for the tax reduction?
No, we hate his mean tweets. Impossible for anything he did to be positive.
Hello. Is this a room full of libertarians explaining all the countless ways they think governments should restrict people's freedoms in the most brutal and capricious ways?
Good, wouldn't want anything to change too suddenly.
Fantastic! Precisely correct!
It’s an individual right to live in any country you want? To the point of having governments fund the transition costs?
Credit for hypocritical inaction?
Biden supports private resettlement for Ukraine, but public funding for EVERYTHING else.
This is not a plan to be applauded. It is a departure from core beliefs to orient resources (capital and political) elsewhere.
Only an idiot applauds a fundamental enemy of freedom for forced requisite departure from the enemy's plan. Are you an idiot? Precisely what freedom has Biden's administration actually supported?
Whenever I see you post I imagine a cute little animated puppy called GG, comic relief, barking stupid shit while running between the legs of the characters that actually matter.
That’s much better than how I envision him (namely, cosplaying in an SS uniform).
Hey, those Hugo Boss uniforms aren't going to sell themselves!
I could see him as the Jewish concentration camp guard.
I work from home providing various internet services for an hourly rate of $80 USD. I never thought it would be possible, but my trustworthy friend (aps-07) persuaded me to take the opportunity after telling me how she quickly earned 13,000 dollars in just four weeks while working on the greatest project. Go to this article for more information.
…..
——————————>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/