More States Poised To Ease Marijuana Laws After Election Day
Ten years after Colorado and Washington embraced legalization, the movement looks unstoppable.

If you dread the prospect of the upcoming midterm elections, you may need a little something to take the edge off. Fortunately, ballots this November feature not only Democratic control freaks and Republican headcases, but also opportunities to loosen marijuana laws. From Nebraska to Florida, Americans have their pick not just of major-party losers, but also of potentially winning proposals to reduce legal restrictions on marijuana use for recreational purposes.
"Marijuana legalization measures are on the 2022 ballot in Arkansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota," handy electoral resource BallotPedia reports. "As of June 2022, 19 states and Washington, D.C., had legalized the possession and personal use of marijuana for recreational purposes, and 37 states and D.C. had legalized marijuana for medical purposes."
The first states to legalize marijuana for recreational use were Colorado and Washington, when voters approved ballot measures 10 years ago, in 2012. The most recent was Rhode Island, through legislation signed in May of this year. Depending on how voters decide, more jurisdictions could join the ranks of those where marijuana is at least somewhat legally available, as opposed to offered by underground entrepreneurs who service willing customers in defiance of presumptuous and intrusive laws.
Whether ballot-box decisions result in functioning, above-board markets is another matter; U.S. states have a history of passing nominal legalization measures that are so burdened with rules and high taxes that the illicit market remains more attractive for buyers and sellers alike. But the end of prohibition is in sight across the country as more states liberalize their laws and leave prohibitionists in the dust. That means not just easier access to a popular intoxicant, but also fewer lives disrupted by confrontations between police and the public.
In all five states where voters will decide marijuana measures this year, explicit recreational use is on the ballot. A similar measure was postponed in Oklahoma after the state government dragged its feet in verifying signatures, while a medical-use measure failed to make the ballot in Nebraska. Prospects are good for several of the measures going before voters: the Arkansas proposal enjoys 58 percent support, the Maryland measure has 59 percent support, and the Missouri proposal has 62 percent support. There's apparently been no polling on the matter in North Dakota, while a July poll in South Dakota had the measure underwater with voters.
Overall, Americans have moved to embrace marijuana legalization over the last few decades. Favored by only 12 percent of those surveyed by Gallup in 1969, dumping prohibition became a majority preference at the national level just as Colorado and Washington were changing their laws. As of last year, 68 percent of respondents favor legalization.
Regular marijuana use remains a decidedly minority taste, but has actually grown to exceed tobacco in terms of popularity over the years.
"Some 16 percent of Americans say they currently smoke marijuana, while a total of 48 percent say they have tried it at some point in their lifetime," Gallup noted last month. "Cigarette smoking incidence has dropped steadily over the decades, from a high of 45 percent in the mid-1950s. Today, a new low of 11 percent of American adults report being smokers."
So, the surge in support for legalization, to the point where it's the position taken by two-thirds of Americans, seems to represent massive growth in tolerance for what others choose to do rather than a desire by enthusiasts to make it easier to use the intoxicant themselves. People are now less interested in trying to stop others from consuming marijuana, even if they don't care to use the stuff.
That said, none of the measures on which voters will decide simply get government out of the way and let individuals decide how to consume, produce, buy, and sell marijuana as free individuals; that would be far too sensible. Instead, the measures generally allow for restricted commerce, caps on the amount people can possess, and limited homegrow. The Arkansas proposal, for instance, allows adults over 21 to possess up to one ounce of marijuana, permits existing medical marijuana dispensaries to sell recreational product, and allows for an additional 40 licenses vendors to be chosen by lottery. That's not encouraging given that burdensome rules and taxes have already hobbled legalization efforts elsewhere.
"The state has taxed marijuana three separate times as it travels from farm to consumer. Many counties and cities impose their own taxes, at varying levels, on top of the state levies," The Washington Post reported in August of California's byzantine system which favors large corporate operations with the ability to navigate regulations. "California's cannabis taxes come on top of licensing fees and regulatory permits, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars annually for growers, burying those who used to work without regulation in red tape and state invoices."
The result is that legal products are often uncompetitive with what's sold by underground vendors.
"Far from being eradicated, the black market is booming in plain sight, luring customers away from aboveboard retailers with their cheaper—if untested and unregulated—product," the Los Angeles Times noted this month.
Other states seem determined to repeat errors made elsewhere.
"Since June 1, the New York's Cannabis Control Board has issued 162 recreational cultivation licenses," Bloomberg Tax observed in August. "Those fortunate enough to obtain one of New York's recreational cannabis licenses will be forced to contend with a gauntlet of state and local taxes."
New York also gives preference in license applications to those with marijuana convictions. Motivated by equity concerns, it's a regulatory barrier intended to mold the market into a form preferred by lawmakers but guaranteed to keep many established dealers in the thriving illicit economy where participants do as they please.
Then again, even politicians can sometimes learn. Oregon eased some regulatory hurdles, California is eliminating the marijuana cultivation tax, and Washington reduced restrictions on who can get licenses. Economic reality functions with little regard for the desires of politicians; eventually, they're forced to ease restrictions to match what buyers and sellers are willing to tolerate.
So, keep an eye on electoral results in November. Whatever else happens, there's likely to be somewhat eased access to legal marijuana to either help your celebrations or else ease the pain.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Looking forward to it passing in Missouri, even though I'm not a user myself.
Chronic marijuana usage causes schizophrenia and homosexuality. Don't believe me? Just look at Joe Rogan.
That was the horse paste, yo.
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-06] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
When will the feds catch up to the states?
When Dark Brandon learns that Hunter smokes grass in addition to crack.
The feds can't keep their hands out of the cookie jar. All they have to do is get rid of federal possession penalties, deschedule it, and take the banking restrictions off. Unfortunately, it will likely only pass at the federal level when they have enough votes to fuck everyone nationwide with a new regulatory body and huge tax rates.
You're probably right.
Suppose they added 86.000 new IRS agents?
Would that be an indicator?
If the feds legalize it - who is going to make all these license plates???
I guess they can use pro-life protesters arrested during FBI raids.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/fbi-swat-team-conducts-early-morning-raid-arrests-pro-life-activist-at-pennsylvania-home-report
Why bother? With Trumpanzees taking over the LP to cut all vestiges of our original plank to protect the individual rights of women, feds can expect other individual rights to be gutted soon enough. The post-2016 plank calling for the uninspected admission of suicide-vest terrorists, and the other one letting vigilantes conduct extrajudicial executions while calling for tax-supported food and warmth for convicted murderers... those, and bigotry, can stay.
Thanks for explaining one of the many reasons I'm not a member of a political party.
If only there was a political party that supported the abolition of these things... Maybe centered around individual liberty... I wonder what it would be called.
SQURLSY, is that you?
What about the shitlib takeover that we need 750 million illegal immigrants to prove we're not racist?
What do you mean by protect the individual rights of women?
When will the feds catch up to the states?
They're waiting to see how abortion plays out.
In most cases, legalization actually means taxation.
And because it is taxed, it requires heavy regulation.
Yeah, but all the editors at reason get to get baked and have ENB ride their bob, in exchange for money, all legally!
agreed...but that's better than prohibition.
The Dems will pass it because passing it means regulation and taxation; and there is nothing the Dems like more than regulations and taxation. It's the Reps that will likely balk for moral reasons ( or at least the appearance of moral reasons.) Non of it matters until it is fixed at the federal level (unlikely) or the Feds decide it's not their place and renounce jurisdiction (even more unlikely) to the states.
Democrats would tax air if they could.
Their plan, ideally, for them, is to tax the shit out of everything, and then redistribute those taxes, from each according to their ability, to each according to their need. Except for the elected officials however, they all get to be millionaires.
Always remember’ A Progressive is a Socialist is a Communist is a Fascist. All are Big Government brands, and there is less difference between them, on the ground, than there is between Ketchup and Catsup.
Do. Not. EVER. Buy into the fiction that Socialists are Left Wing and Fascists are Right Wing. Yes, they often hate each-other. They are in competition to tell the rest of us what to do.
This is a good post, thank you.
wonderfully said!
Bye bye, cross-dresser.
Not to mention the trial lawyers. They can hardly wait to start suing Big Pot.
Momentum counts. The second derivative of the almost vertical population growth curve changed to negative back when The Pill and the LP population plank became things. (The rest of you can look it up.) Yet when you look at the measurements, the slope of that curve continued nearly vertical, with population doubling since that time. Only recently, with population increasing by 200,000 people a day, has the tiniest flattening of that slope of the curve become visible. Our repudiation of Prohibition and Comstockism alike has also been slowly but inexorably repealing cruel laws against leaves.
Hank?
So, what we are seeing is several more States looking to screw things up by making a legal market that they will then tax and regulate until the Black Market is thriving again.
Let. It. Freaking. Go.
I don’t smoke pot. I haven’t in something like thirty years, and didn’t do it often even when I was younger. It isn’t my cuppa. Doesn’t matter. Drug Prohibition has been the same miserable failure as Alcohol Prohibition was. Legalize it all. Regulate only for purity. In spite of all the running around like headless chickens, there isn’t, and never HAS been a ‘drug epidemic’. Drunks outnumber druggies by an order of magnitude, and did even way back before the Volstead act when there were States that were dry but had no laws against cocaine, heroin, and marijuana.
Drunks outnumber druggies by an order of magnitude, and did even way back before the Volstead act when there were States that were dry but had no laws against cocaine, heroin, and marijuana.
^
Bastiat said that when law and morality come into conflict, one must choose between the two.
Drug laws are stupid and based mostly upon lies. So they’re an example of law conflicting with morality.
That makes them a simple and convenient way to sort out those who choose law from those who choose morality.
Because those who deal with the law have no use for people with morals.
"Drug laws are stupid and based mostly upon lies. So they’re an example of law conflicting with morality."
Stupidity and falsehood are subjective. Or are you about to go full Misek on us and say that lying should be illegal and the courts should adjudicate what is true?
Is everything, you disagree with personally, immoral or just drug laws? The correct look at this is that people own their bodies, and as long as they don't harm others property, it is their natural right to do as they wish. Argue your affirmative position rather than just say what you view as negative about another position.
IL has a fairly substantial tax on recreational pot (very low to non existent on medical card holders buying the same products.) They still sell a billion dollars worth + a year. What is interesting, though, is that IL tracks in state vs out of state purchasers. Its amazing what Iowa, Indiana, Missouri, Kentucky and Wisconsin residents spend here.
Missouri has medical now and is likely to pass their rec bill which will cut substantially into our sales (especially around heavily populated greater metro St Louis).
If IL would get a fkn clue and realize that selling way more product with a small tax per transaction/product, they would make more overall tax revenue it would be a miracle. While we sell 1billion+ worth every year we could easily sell 2billion or 3billion worth. The price of 1/8th oz at the store is 50-65 dollars (pre tax) and the tax is roughly 25% so make it 70 to 80dollars for an eighth. On the street, that same eighth is 30-40dollars. Not hard to see why the underground market is not going anywhere.
One of the goals we were promised with legalization was to replace the black market with the above ground market. But our taxes and regulations ensure the black market in cannabis is as healthy as ever. I wish somebody would learn from our mistakes but sadly it doesn’t seem to be the case.
If limits could be imposed on government the ALL markets would be "Black" markets. It is only politics that creates the distinction. Political success it ONLY measured by how much increased oppression a politician is responsible for.
"But the end of prohibition is in sight across the country as more states liberalize their laws and leave prohibitionists in the dust."
The end of the federal war on drugs is in sight! Libertarian moment! The federal government passing an amendment to make it legal will end prohibition and not one second sooner. If only the Congress that had ended alcoholic prohibition had actually realized the fundamental principle of self ownership that they were arguing around, so many bad laws and outcomes could have been avoided.
I've lived through "legalization" in Colorado and then in Maine. In both cases the legislature views the topic as a brand new, greenfield opportunity to impose restrictions, fees, taxes, limits, testing...anything they can possible do.
The reason is because the ONLY measure of political success is determined by how much increase in oppression a politican is responsible for. No other actions count towards political success.