Biden's Party Is Still Boosting Those 'MAGA Republicans' the President Warned Us About
New Hampshire Republican candidates get a leg up from expensive Democratic ad buys.

Three states hold their primary elections today: Delaware, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. After a redistricting process conducted by a court-appointed special master, both of New Hampshire's congressional districts are considered competitive, and one of its Senate seats could be in play as well. But unfortunately, Democrats are once again playing with fire by supporting immoderate Republican candidates.
Sen. Maggie Hassan (D–N.H.) is running for reelection after beating a Republican incumbent in 2016 by one-tenth of a percentage point. Among her 10 potential Republican rivals, national Republicans support Chuck Morse, a moderate who serves as the state's Senate president.
But earlier this month, Senate Majority PAC, which is aligned with Sen. Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.), funded an ad for one of Morse's primary opponents: Don Bolduc, whom even allies call a "loose cannon." Bolduc has proposed sending U.S. troops to fight in Ukraine, and described Gov. Chris Sununu as a "Chinese Communist sympathizer." The ad refers to Morse as "another sleazy politician," chosen by "Mitch McConnell's Washington establishment." The PAC spent over $3 million, more than five times what Bolduc has raised in campaign contributions.
On the House side, Rep. Annie Kuster is running unopposed for the Democratic nomination in the state's second congressional district. The Republican field, on the other hand, is crowded, with seven candidates running to be Kuster's opponent. A mid-August poll found that while 51 percent of respondents would vote for "someone new" over Kuster, no Republican candidate had any sort of consolidated support.
In May, Sununu endorsed Keene's mayor, George Hansel, in the race. Sununu, a relatively moderate Republican in a politically independent state, is also one of the country's most popular governors. Last year, Republican Senate leadership even tried to convince him to run against Hassan.
Similarly, Hansel is a moderate Republican mayor of a relatively liberal city. He says he would oppose gun control measures but he would also oppose federal bans on abortion, describing himself as pro-choice but feeling that it is an issue that should be left to the states. His main competition is Robert Burns, a 2016 delegate for former President Donald Trump. Burns supports a federal fetal heartbeat law, as well as a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
But in August, Politico reported on a sizable ad buy centering on Burns. Democrats Serve, a group that "backs Democratic candidates with public service backgrounds," spent $94,000 on a late-August TV spot, nearly six times what Burns himself had spent on ads. It calls Burns "the ultra-conservative candidate for Congress" and says he "follows the Trump playbook on immigration, the border, and guns." A Massachusetts-based political mail firm affiliated with Democrats sent out mailers in August with a similar message.
The ads may have taken different tacks, but all have the same emphasis: presenting moderate Republican candidates as less appealing to the party's base. If Republican primary voters choose candidates further from the mainstream, then Democrats hope to have an easier time beating them in the general election. By now this is a familiar pattern: In states from Maryland to Pennsylvania to Michigan, Democrats have collectively spent tens of millions on ads painting Republican candidates as "too conservative" or "handpicked by Trump."
It's a bad idea in any context, but the tactic looks especially craven in light of President Joe Biden's speech in Philadelphia earlier this month.
From Independence Hall, Biden warned that "Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic." He said they "promote authoritarian leaders," "fan the flames of political violence," and are "committed…to destroying American democracy." Opposing these forces constituted "a battle for the soul of this nation."
But Biden's warning rings hollow while his party is spending a fortune propping up MAGA Republican candidates, hoping to make them just electable enough for primary voters but not quite electable enough for the general public. It's a considerable gamble that could easily backfire.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Odd that there's no mention of how much the Republican Party is spending to get MAGA Republicans elected. Is it just because of the low quality of these candidates as Mitch McConnell said? As the leader of the GOP, Mitch would know low quality when he sees low quality.
Related question: is McConnell supporting non-MAGA candidates before the primaries, or just criticizing the winning candidates after they win?
I’m by and by turning out to be further $19k or extra month-to-month from local through doing surprisingly sincere and clean task online from local. [res-852] I truly have gained expressly $20845 outrageous month from this local task. be a region of at this point this endeavor and start getting more money online through notice teaching:-
.
At the given webpage:>>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
They did agree to a 5 mil ad buy for Blake masters against Kelly.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (anu-10) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
I work from home providing various internet services for an hourly rate of $80 USD. I never thought it would be possible, but my trustworthy friend (aps-06) persuaded me to take the opportunity after Hac telling me how she quickly earned 13,000 dollars in just four weeks while working on the greatest project. Go to this article for more information.
…..
——————————>>> Here is I started,,,,,,, https://rb.gy/ryqczj
This is similar to the plan to give Trump all the air time in 2016 with the certain knowledge that he would be the worst possible Republican candidate and ensure a Clinton victory . It is just possible that the Democrat strategists are not as smart as they think they are.
^This.
I've noticed that the same pundits with the same polls who are predicting the "MAGA-radical-candidates" can't win in November, predicted President Trump didn't have a prayer in 2016.
I sure hope you are right, but Trump has been tarnished a bit, particularly in the minds of independents and squishy Heffalumps.
Odd that you missed that the article already addressed exactly that point. See, for example, "national Republicans support Chuck Morse, a moderate who serves as the state's Senate president".
There is literally no contradiction between labeling MAGA a domestic terrorist organization, and spending millions of dollars to boost MAGA candidates. None at all.
#LibertariansForBiden
Of course there isn't. Under Alinsky's rules, the worse the better. The Democrats figure that MAGA Republicans are easier to beat, and even if they aren't, they can use them as an excuse for Martial Law or some other extreme measure to prevent MAGA radicals from ever actually taking office. You watch - if the MAGA Republicans actually get elected, do the Democrats allow them to take office on Jan 3? Or are they thrown in jail.
It's heads I win (expected beatability), tails you lose ("We must have revolution to stop them").
Democrats are the ultimate opportunists.
Are Democrats... pouncing?
By Biden's logic and rhetoric, Hansel and Burns are both MAGA Republicans, so I don't know what all the fuss is about. Since they're both irredeemably evil it only makes sense to boost the one that's less likely to win.
Democrats hypocritical. Film at 11.
"Similarly, Hansel is a moderate Republican mayor of a relatively liberal city. He says he would oppose gun control measures but he would also oppose federal bans on abortion, describing himself as pro-choice but feeling that it is an issue that should be left to the states. His main competition is Robert Burns, a 2016 delegate for former President Donald Trump. Burns supports a federal fetal heartbeat law, as well as a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border."
What about the other issues? Foreign Policy? Civil liberties? Spending? What other issues is Hansel allegedly "moderate" on? As I recall Dick Cheney was also a "moderate" on some social issues too, same with John McCain, doesn't mean anyone should've ever voted for them.
"Don Bolduc, whom even allies call a "loose cannon." Bolduc has proposed sending U.S. troops to fight in Ukraine"
This is bad if true however, once again, is the "moderate" in the race really any better? Or is he just avoiding using "divisive" rhetoric? I don't understand why we should take CNN and Politico's words at face value regarding these candidates. Or why libertarians should worry over a "moderate" losing to a conservative when no explanation is given on how the moderate is actually better from a libertarian perspective.
How could this possibly go wrong? [Don't worry, I'm being sarcastic.]
perfectly follows "The Left Can't Meme" narrative.
Democrats need to think hard about their dirty tricks, because karma always strikes back at the most inopportune times.
The Supreme Court is sitting at a 6-3/5-4 advantage now, with multiple judgeships filled elsewhere from 2017-2020, specifically because of their reindeer games.
Where's the Free State candidate?
FSP focuses mostly on state level offices because their aim is changing the state. A lot of their candidates did pretty well in 2020 and there is a considerable liberty coalition in the House. The Senate, unfortunately, it still controlled by the Republican establishement which in NH is very "moderate" in a sense that libertarians shouldn't like very much.
Nice that reason found something they could criticize Biden for.
Democrats love interfering in GOP primaries. It worked for them many times before, allowing them to elevate the most beatable candidate to the general election (Todd Akin, Sharon Angle, etc...). They can do this because they are a very unified party with essentially unlimited funds. They will keep doing it until it no longer works.
They probably have a backup plan in case the MAGA Republicans actually get elected - throw them into jail before they can formally take office on Jan 3.
I can’t remember the last time a democratic candidate was described as extreme or far left.
like that good ol Stacey Abrams. Def a normal moderate.
I mean except for advocating for straight up socialism and defunding the police at a time ATL is having major crime issues.
Standard moderate positions
Did the article refer to any Democrats as moderate?
NH establishment Republicans do tend to be rather moderate. Which means not making any big changes in the direction of more liberty (a few exceptions like permitless carry, no restrictions on knives or other bladed weapons). Moderation in that sense is not something a libertarian minded person should be cheering on.
It always goes in one direction here.
"Republicans pounce" aint a meme for no reason
Don't forget her election denial.
And she is fat. Her moderate eating habits have resulted in a moderately obese frame. Moderation in all things. Well, unless you are a MAGA terrorist; then you are not moderate at all.
She’s big boned!
I think we need a constitutional convention just to add a max BMI of 40 to the qualifications for office.
Just like Fetterman. Right !
I’m voting Republican this November.
Not by anyone with a lick of sense.