This Alabama Woman Was Jailed for 3 Months Because She Smoked Pot While Pregnant
Pregnant and postpartum women arrested on minor drug charges can find themselves locked up for months in Etowah County.

A new report out of Etowah County, Alabama, reveals that a woman there was jailed for three months after admitting to smoking marijuana while pregnant. The type of law that led to her incarceration is not unique to Alabama, and such punitive laws don't achieve their goal of promoting healthy pregnancies.
According to Al.com's Amy Yurkanin, Ashley Banks was arrested on May 25 after being found with "a small amount of marijuana" and a pistol that she was not licensed to carry. She admitted to having smoked marijuana on the day she found out she was pregnant, which led to her being charged with the "chemical endangerment" of her fetus. Despite having a high-risk pregnancy, the fact that she had admitted to smoking marijuana while pregnant landed Banks in jail.
Under Alabama state law, women arrested for drug use who are pregnant or have recently given birth can be charged with chemical endangerment, which requires them to post a $10,000 bond and go to rehab to regain their freedom.
Banks was incarcerated for three months without being convicted of a crime. During her incarceration, she experienced "bleed[ing] for five weeks in jail. She said she also suffered from hunger and fainting spells," according to Yurkanin's report. "Two times, specialists evaluated her for drug addiction and found [Banks] didn't qualify for free addiction services offered through the state." Yurkanin adds that investigators told Banks to claim she had a drug addiction so she could get into treatment and be bailed out of jail.
Banks was finally released to community corrections on August 25.
According to Yurkanin's investigation, more than 150 Etowah County women have been charged with "chemical endangerment" of their pregnancies, even when their children are born healthy or do not test positive for drugs. A 2015 ProPublica investigation found that while other Alabama counties tend to enforce the law only when an infant tests positive for drugs, Etowah County "law enforcement officials have drawn what they call 'a line in the sand,' vowing to aggressively pursue all chemical-endangerment cases, starting from pregnancy."
According to a 2022 report from the Guttmacher Institute, "24 states and the District of Columbia consider substance use during pregnancy to be child abuse under civil child-welfare statutes, and 3 consider it grounds for civil commitment." Additionally, "25 states and the District of Columbia require health care professionals to report suspected prenatal drug use, and 8 states require them to test for prenatal drug exposure if they suspect drug use."
Alabama, as Banks' case demonstrates, is especially punitive on this issue. That's because the state Supreme Court has held that any illicit drug use while pregnant is "chemical endangerment" of a child. The South Carolina Supreme Court established a similar precedent, Guttmacher notes, when it ruled that "maternal acts endangering or likely to endanger the life, comfort, or health of a viable fetus" constitute criminal child abuse.
These laws are intended to protect fetuses but fail even on those grounds. A 2015 report by researcher Rebecca Stone concluded that "policies that substance-using women find threatening discourage them from seeking comprehensive medical treatment during their pregnancies." What's more, jails and prisons are not favorable places to receive prenatal care. According to a 2019 study from Johns Hopkins researchers, in some states at least 20 percent of incarcerated women's pregnancies ended in miscarriage, far more than the national average of 10 percent to 15 percent.
It is particularly risible—even in a legal system that grants personhood to fetuses—to punish pregnant women for using cannabis. "Studies on marijuana use during pregnancy are inconsistent and inconclusive," Reason Senior Editor Elizabeth Nolan Brown reported in 2021. "But cannabis is not known to be teratogenic—that is, to cause birth defects—in humans. The bulk of scientific evidence suggests that risks posed to developing fetuses are relatively minor and babies exposed to marijuana in utero still fall within normal ranges of outcomes."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
such punitive laws don't achieve their goal of promoting healthy pregnancies
I know it may be hard for a modern woman to understand, but 'give birth' or 'grind babies into goo' are not the only two life paths.
Do I really gotta play the Biology Course card to mansplain feminism to you bitches?
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (aof-04) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://cashprofit99.netlify.app/
Imagine that...smoking while pregnant. Add to this a substance as deleterious as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC], and someone defending that dumb practice.
....
https://www.acog.org/womens-health/infographics/marijuana-and-pregnancy
Marijuana and Pregnancy (Text Version)
[Marijuana leaf illustration]
If you use marijuana during pregnancy, you may be putting your health and your fetus’s health at risk.
Possible Effects on Your Fetus
Disruption of brain development before birth [brain icon]
Smaller size at birth [baby icon]
Higher risk of stillbirth [baby icon]
Higher chance of being born too early, especially when a woman uses both marijuana and cigarettes during pregnancy [ultrasound image icon]
Harm from secondhand marijuana smoke [symbol of medicine]
Behavioral problems in childhood and trouble paying attention in school [symbol of medicine]
Well certainly we should lock these women up. In fact we should lock up all pregnant women in case they do something you disapprove of.
Just send them and their offspring to your home so that you can take care of them. We will wait for your home address. Given your level of cognitive and intellectual development, chances of mother or baby surviving look grim
lol don't fear tha'weed it's just a plant
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. (res-03) Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
After reading this article:>>>> https://workofferweb24.netlify.app/
So, forced abortions?
See? To totalitarian whackos, everything is either prohibited or mandatory. In either of their two mutually exclusive, jointly exhaustive alternatives, politicians direct goons with guns to do the coercing. In the real world people who value their own lives find a way to not threaten the lives of others. Those who don't, bet that for every initiation of force there isn't any unequal or apposite reprisal force. Ceausescu (Romania's Red Republican) and his mizzus showed how that goes.
To deranged assholes like this, reading comprehension is hard.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
IDK, it gets kinda hard to say the woman should be able to drink her kid into FAS but not be able to transition them at 5 *and* abort them at 6, or 8, or 20 weeks or whatever, but not at 35 weeks. If we were talking about a physical therapist, who chose her occupation, hotboxing the room of a disabled COPD patient, it'd be pretty fucking heinous, if not actually illegal.
Paul SE, Hatoum AS, Fine JD, et al. Associations Between Prenatal Cannabis Exposure and Childhood Outcomes: Results From the ABCD Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(1):64–76. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2902
Alongside increasingly permissive sociocultural attitudes and laws surrounding cannabis,1 past-month cannabis use among pregnant US women increased by 106% from 2002 (3.4%) to 2017 (7.0%).2 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive component of cannabis, crosses the placenta and interfaces with the endocannabinoid system, which is associated with neural development.3-5
Conclusions
Despite increasingly permissive social attitudes and the marked relaxation of legal restrictions on cannabis use,1 prenatal cannabis exposure and the correlated risks that it indexes may place offspring at increased risk for psychopathology in middle childhood. In the context of increasing cannabis use among pregnant women,2,6 it is clear that more studies on the association between prenatal cannabis exposure and offspring developmental outcomes are needed to examine potential causal effects, moderating or protective factors, and biological mechanisms.74,75 Similar to the effective messaging surrounding the adverse consequences of alcohol and tobacco exposure during pregnancy, education regarding the potential harms associated with prenatal cannabis use is necessary. Currently, pregnant women, and even those contemplating pregnancy, should be discouraged from using any cannabis by health care professionals, dispensaries, and others; women refraining from cannabis use during pregnancy may benefit offspring.11,14
“May cause”. You are advocating for the incarceration of non violent persons on the basis of speculation and what “might be,” Mr Law and Order.
Throwing a pregnant or post partum woman into jail on this basis is a travesty
Fuck off, slaver
It is also a travesty of justice to force me to assume the risk of paying for her potentially brain damaged offspring. Yet, that's what our society does.
In your world, it's apparently fine to force people at gunpoint to pay for the bad decisions of other people. Take your own advice: fuck off slaver.
As long as I am forced at gunpoint to pay for other people's medical care, I am going to involve myself in their lives. Don't like it? Abolish the social welfare state.
He wasn't "advocating" anything, he was just citing a paper. It's you who doesn't like the conclusions of that paper.
Furthermore, all legal systems recognize that risk ("might be", "speculation") is often the same as actual harm. That is, if you force me to assume your risk, that is causing me actual harm, whether damages are actually incurred or not.
We might as well admit that Teedy Roosevelt's Comstockist "race suicide" fantasies assimilated by book-burning Hitlerites in 1920, Mussolini in 1925, Monteiro Lobato by 1926 and Beatles-albums-burners in Alabama in 1966 are a less than brilliant premise upon which to amend the Constitution. Letting the likes of Biden, Trump, Lindsay Graham Cracker and Marjorie Greene Teeth redefine "persons" as "expected" entities is even worse.
We can easily admit that the deranged commenter here needs to fuck off and die.
roll tide.
Just wondering, but what would the penalty for smoking pot in Alabama be for a non-pregnant man?
Forfeiture of the miscreant's Beatles albums to the Grand Goblin's bonfire, followed by three decades in a Dixiecrat prison?
Eat shit and die, asshole.
Year in prison, $6000 fine, Six months drivers license suspension.
Yep, still in the cannabis dark ages here in AL.
How do you know he/him isn't pregnant?!
Incarceration and shame is what this citizen needs.
Thank God men were there to protect this slut from herself.
Clumps love drugs.
Question: IF she told the court that she was planning on getting an abortion and just hadn't gotten around to it yet, would that absolve the charges?
Where ARE all the gloating, girl-bullying Trumpanzees? Back in March we'd be awash in coarse, misspelled imprecations and execrations of the kidnapped female individual. Where's the raucous hooting about how thangs're gonna BE whin God's Orange Populist gets the lead role in a remake of Victory of Faith (Der Sieg des Glaubens). Where are the 80 or 160 missing grey rectangles? Surely such a huge mob of surly silverbacks ain't a-skeert mere females would dare unseat the rest of God's Own Poltroons!
Fuck off and die, asshole.
This is like a political prisoner. Biden should get her out somehow.
"Ashley Banks was arrested on May 25 after being found with "a small amount of marijuana" and a pistol that she was not licensed to carry."
So what happened to the gun charge?
All I hear is that we need more and stronger gun laws, yet we are not enforcing the ones we have.
Not just the licensing issue - in most states, it's illegal to have a gun in your physical possession when you're drunk or under the influence.
"such punitive laws don't achieve their goal of promoting healthy pregnancies"
Well, Emma, I will bet your next paycheck that in Alabama, the goal is NOT 'promoting healthy pregnancies', rather to punish the smoker.
No mention of the unconstitutional gun charges?
Other than that, great article.
"Use Gov-Guns against those 'icky' people!!!"
^The worst mentality ever to be put into power..
Idiotic.
We also lock up people for attempted murder and attempted robbery.
Given that we live in a social welfare state, women who take drugs while pregnant should be punished, because society has to bear the risk of caring for their potentially damaged off-spring.
In 1972 the LP picked up the birth control standard of quashed hippie parties. The Supreme Court used our plank to decide in Roe that Eliza ought to have about 100 days' head start on the Fugitive Slave vigilantes legalized in Article 4 Section 2 Clause 3, now carefully unmentioned. That license to rape and enslave, sanctioned by the Dred Scott decision, was mooted by the 13th Amendment. Coathanger and involuntary reproduction States total not 1/4 of the Union. Another antislavery amendment can pass by 2/3 majority now that the LP platform longer defends individual rights.
Eat shit and die, asshole.
Yep, the original LP platform--source of the Roe minimum timeframe--abandoned defense of individual rights of women in 1980, and the Austrian Anschlussed LP deleted all remaining traces of the plank that earned us 12% a year in vote share growth before it was gutted. Turning women--half the electorate--against the new, cowardly, anarcho-fascist LP, was the culmination of Trumpanzee treason against the rights individuals once had... to be free from government initiation of force.
Pretty sure that anyone considering libertarian viewpoints would take one look at this asshole's post and say:
Not on your LIFE!
Fuck off and die, shitpile.