In Philadelphia, Joe Biden Peddled a Competing Brand of Authoritarianism
The current president becomes what he criticizes by delegitimizing opposition.

Back in the distant year of 2020, Joe Biden sold himself as a unifier, able to bridge divides created by then-President Donald Trump.
What a long way he's fallen. Last week, he took to a stage to denounce his political opponents as a "threat to this country" in a setting seemingly chosen by 20-something staffers who dusted off imagery from V for Vendetta. And he did so not as a political candidate, but "as your president." Even for those of us who agree that Republicans are a flawed bunch defined by their loyalty to a wannabe caudillo, Biden's alternative is just a different brand of authoritarianism.
"There is no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven, and intimidated by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans, and that is a threat to this country," President Biden insisted in a speech at Philadelphia's Independence Hall, lit blood-red and flanked in the background by two marines. "And here, in my view, is what is true: MAGA Republicans do not respect the Constitution. They do not believe in the rule of law. They do not recognize the will of the people."
It's true that former President Trump threw a temper tantrum when he lost the 2020 election and that his supporters rioted at the Capitol. To this day, Trump and company nurse fantasies of stolen elections. But it's not clear what use for the Constitution and rule of law is harbored by his successor, who took office with an avalanche of executive orders that disconcerted even The New York Times editorial board and recently launched a half-trillion-dollar vote-buying scheme by unilaterally forgiving student loans.
"Look, I know politics can be fierce and mean and nasty in America," Biden added. "I get it. I believe in the give-and-take of politics, in disagreement and debate and dissent."
He believes in disagreement, debate, and dissent? Really? But his administration quietly deputized supporters at social media companies to suppress disfavored news stories and viewpoints, as revealed through emails uncovered in a lawsuit by the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri.
"The social media companies are at pains to show that they share the government's goals, which is precisely the problem," Reason's Jacob Sullum noted. "Given the broad powers that the federal government has to make life difficult for these businesses through public criticism, litigation, regulation, and legislation, the Biden administration's 'asks' for stricter moderation are tantamount to commands."
Prior to that, the FBI distributed a bulletin on symbols "used by Anti-Government or Anti-Authority Violent Extremists" that included patriotic imagery from the American Revolution. It makes you wonder why the White House bothered to choose Independence Hall as the backdrop for last week's speech. And earlier, the Department of Homeland Security had to quickly deep-six its new Disinformation Governance Board after discovering that Americans aren't ready to let government officials define truth.
"They promote authoritarian leaders, and they fan the flames of political violence that are a threat to our personal rights, to the pursuit of justice, to the rule of law, to the very soul of this country," Biden went on to huff about his GOP opponents in Philadelphia.
There's no denying the events of Jan. 6 and the explosion of anger by Republicans pissed that ballots didn't deliver victory to their guy. But there's also no glossing over the assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh and attacks on pro-life centers. Incidents of political violence target and are perpetrated by left and right alike.
"The rise both of threats and actual violence shows the dangerous levels of polarization, extremism, and radicalization that we face in America today," Darrell M. West wrote for the Brookings Institution in August. "In the current period, people see opponents as enemies and many do not trust the motives or actions of opposition leaders."
Disturbingly, Biden plays to a willing audience with comments that already included painting opponents as fans of "semi-fascism." Many Americans eagerly buy into the villainization of political opponents.
"While Republicans and Democrats may hold distinct views on many things, there is one area in which they precisely mirror each other: their contempt for members of the opposite party." The University of Chicago's Institute of Politics reported in June. "About three-quarters (73 percent) of voters who identify themselves as Republican agree that 'Democrats are generally bullies who want to impose their political beliefs on those who disagree.' An almost identical percentage of Democrats (74 percent) express that view of Republicans."
If the other side is viewed with contempt, why allow it any say in government? Last September, a solid 46 percent of Biden voters and 44 percent of Trump voters told University of Virginia Center for Politics pollsters they at least somewhat agreed "it would be better for America if whoever is president could take needed actions without being constrained by Congress or the courts."
With all due respect to both the current and former presidents, which isn't much, what differentiates them, and their political organizations, isn't the degree of their adherence to the Constitution and liberal norms, it's the branding on their disdain for those things.
"Each side is using some legitimate complaints to build a permission structure for seizing power by any means necessary and raining down destruction on its foes," Reason senior editor Stephanie Slade writes in the October issue. "One result is a sort of bipartisan apocalypticism: A recent Yahoo News poll found that more than half of each major party believes it's likely that America will 'cease to be a democracy in the future.' Under these circumstances, extreme medicine can start to seem like the only logical response."
So, Democrats and Republicans race each other to jettison respect for the Constitution, limited government, and liberty, using the excesses of their opponents as the excuse. Inevitably, their adversaries return the favor, moving further down the path of delegitimizing opposition.
"He's an enemy of the state, you wanna know the truth," Trump shot back at the president at a Pennsylvania rally two days after Biden's "threat to this country" speech. "The enemy of the state is him and the group that control him."
President Biden is right that Donald Trump and the Republican party represent an authoritarian threat to this country. But if he takes a clear look in the mirror, he'll see himself and his Democrats offering nothing better than competing authoritarianism.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I just cannot get over how badass Joe Biden looks in that photo. Give a raise to whoever was in charge of the visuals.
#LibertariansForBiden
Literally Hitler.
Needs more burning torches and rows of troops.
I’m sure the DNC was advised to keep the number of troops on stage to a minimum, being that Brandon only polled four points more than Trump amongst active duty in the last election.
And I would have loved to have been at the two Jarheads staff briefing before the Big Guy’s speech.
And barbed wire.
And perhaps some symbols of working people. Hammers? Sickles?
Like a very lonely Hitler that nobody likes.
Virgin hitler
Someone hasn't read Adolf Hitler's 08SEP1934 speech to Nazi Womanhood on their duty to the Party. It's a rewrite of Teedy Roosevelt's 1902 and 1907 race suicide letters scolding American women for insufficient zeal in childbearing. Hitler peddled Christian National Socialism; Stalin, Kruschev are the poster boys for Soviet internationalsocialism. Volksgenosse should know the difference.
"Hitler peddled Christian National Socialism"
You sure about that, Hank?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchenkampf
Hank is pretty sure about a lot of stupid things that aren’t true. He’s also as senile as Biden.
He so desperately wants to be Agile Cyborg, but AC became more readable the more drugs he took, not less.
Instead he sounds like some weirdo that mumbles a lot and laughs at jokes he tells himself out loud.
Most animals don't breed in captivity. It's just another reason why communism is doomed to fail.
What if the great leader does all the "breeding"?
That's a lie. Women had better sex in the Soviet Union. That was back when Russia was still the good guy, before that evil Putler took over.
It’s sad how invested you are in this one issue.
Man, you were doing so good at this point in the thread, sarcasmic. Still had the Hankie shtick going perfectly. Maybe ease back to 3 liters of everclear on days when you're going to sock?
For calling out fascists for being fascists? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-pennsylvania-january-6-nazi-b2159295.html If he's not a fascist, it's weird he's doing a rally in support of a neo nazi.
Democracy Dies in Dark Brandon.
thanks https://oto.4u-review.com/verve-oto/
I'm just glad to see that JD was able to dampen his TDS a bit in this article.
I certainly agree that both Biden and Trump are equally threats to the nation. It was a stupid idea to have two Presidents. We should get rid of one of them.
Thunderdome!
Nothing survives except Biden's bicycle.
No polearms or chainsaws with no gas. Just lengths of chain and rusty straight razors that have been scraped on the curb.
Remember all those times we all died and all the wars Trump started with his dangerous rhetoric?
You can’t rewrite history!
So sick of dying all the time.
And if Trump hadn't rolled out the red carpet for Russia to invade Ukraine, gas would still be under 5 bucks a gallon most likely.
Competing brand? Really, both sides crap? There's only one of these two actually peddling authoritarianism, and it's emanating from the far left and those in the moderate left who go along with it. They want to actively squash any ideas that compete with theirs, and candidates who propose something different than their corporatist and socialist ideas, and this President here made it known that about half the country is their sworn enemy.
Tuccile is 100% on board with that, and looking forward to writing the "both sidez" article to downplay mass democide.
The sort of authoritarian government Biden has in mind is akin to that of Stalin's idea of democracy.
For the past three years we've all been witness to what the left has brought to America.
Yes, it is both sides. Trump got up on stage two days later and called Biden followers the enemy.
Can y’all just go off somewhere, have your Red vs Blue Team showdown, and leave the rest of us out of it.
Caw caw!
Mike, as usual, is lying.
Here's what Trump actually said:
“He [Biden] is an enemy of the state, if you want to know the truth. The enemy of the state is him and the group that control him which is circling around him,”
But look at Mike pretend that he said it about the people who voted for Biden. There's an enourmous difference between what Trump and Biden said.
So dishonest.
There's nothing more Team Blue than what Mike just pulled.
He consistently lies on behalf of the left, but hey, he’s just an impartial neutral observer.
Needz moar red lights.
Good Idea. National Socialist Review has a really faithful comments section, I'm told. Mother Jones would welcome input from the outnumbered communist trolls pestering reasonoids.
No, I don’t mean comments. I mean all the antifa, courthouse fire settetrs, white nationalists, MAGA rioters, Kyles and his left-wing counterparts go out in the desert, say the playa after Burning Man finishes up, and have it out with knives and chains and guns.
Mike gets excited thinking about violence.
Noticed he threw in someone who was defending property from the left wing mob, and them had to kill a couple pedos in self defense?
Real libertarians don’t believe we should be able to defend our property.
I'm surprised he didn't throw in the insurrectionist militia
womanperson who got shot in the face by a racist piece of shit black cop too.Bullshit, Mike. Open your nose and smell the shit from the left.
I smell it just fine. How come you don’t smell any of the shit coming from the GOP?
It’s not chocking us to death.
You just never complain about it, and whenever anyone else complains about it you say that it's rosewater.
I smell it just fine. How come you don’t smell any of the shit coming from the GOP?
Oh, we can smell it. They tracked it in because you leftists shit on everything.
Again? We need a wet mop on aisle 22. Girl-bullying Trumpanzee just dirtied drawers and drooled in front of the Depends display.
Interesting Hank Phillips is accusing others of crying. Ever seen him talk about the Mises caucus taking over the LP?
This is sarc trying to do Hank's shtick. He couldn't help himself and ended up busting out all of his sarcasmic tropes down below. And we all know there's never been a bigger victim in all of human history than poor victimized sarcasmic. He cunt of a wife wouldn't even let him fuck his daughter! Can you believe how abused he is?
We need security on aisle 6 - TDS-addled asshole throwing a fit.
Hank, did you work yourself up and shit your diapers again?
That’s right Hankeepoo. If someone disagrees with you (or apparently the democrats) they’re obviously just Trumptards who hate women.
Seriously Hank, please stop trying to help the pro-choice side. You’re killing them.
Boaf sidez!
When you spell it funny it makes it not true!
When you fall back to that as a defense mechanism anytime the Democrats show their true nature, it deserves to be mocked and you deserve to be ridiculed.
Coming from the moron who spent 5 years trying to make CACLL a thing.
To Progressives, letting each of the 50 states set social policy is "authoritarian", because some of the 50 states might make different choices than what the Progressives want.
Resisting fascism is fascism.
Yeah... not competing - just waaaay more authentic.
Tuccile is an evil sack of shit.
When conservatives argue that far left policies are bad for America...they do not turn around and fund socialist candidates here.
Because we take the concerns seriously, not as a tool
Well, yes
What a long way he's fallen.
Dramatic, but not realistic. Whenever a politician runs on "unity," they generally mean "shut and do what I want." They want everyone to support their political agenda and to stop trying to prevent it. That's just politics in general, it's not a Democrat or Republican thing.
I don't know how Biden's rhetoric has even really changed. Look at his acceptance speech after the election was called:
We stand again at an inflection point.
We have the opportunity to defeat despair and to build a nation of prosperity and purpose.
We can do it. I know we can.
I’ve long talked about the battle for the soul of America.
We must restore the soul of America.
He had a similar theme to his inaugural address:
A once-in-a-century virus silently stalks the country.
It’s taken as many lives in one year as America lost in all of World War Two.
Millions of jobs have been lost.
Hundreds of thousands of businesses closed.
A cry for racial justice some 400 years in the making moves us. The dream of justice for all will be deferred no longer.
A cry for survival comes from the planet itself. A cry that can’t be any more desperate or any more clear.
And now, a rise in political extremism, white supremacy, domestic terrorism that we must confront and we will defeat.
To overcome these challenges – to restore the soul and to secure the future of America – requires more than words.
It requires that most elusive of things in a democracy: Unity.
In short: get out of our way so we can accomplish the things we want. That's unity. And if you disagree you probably are an extremist, white supremacist, and you want global warming to kill everyone.
“And now, a rise in political extremism, white supremacy, domestic terrorism that we must confront and we will defeat.”
What the fuck did Tuccille think this meant?
I think he is upset about Jane's revenge firebombing all of the pregnancy crices centers
Was going to comment that it’s going to be hard to “both sides” Brandon’s shit show of a speech Friday, but Reason appears to have risen to the challenge once again.
Trump made it a whole lot easier to “both sides” this one: in his rally the other day he called Biden and his followers the “enemy of the state”.
Like, a playground I know you are but what am I response. You can’t get more both sides than that.
Mike is lying. Trump called Biden and his staff enemies of the state.
“He [Biden] is an enemy of the state, if you want to know the truth. The enemy of the state is him and the group that control him which is circling around him,”
Mike's been deliberately misrepresenting Trump's statement since yesterday, variously claiming that he attacked Biden's followers, supporters and voters when he clearly didn't.
But remember, despite playing team blue Goebbels here, Mike swears he's not a Democrat and "both sides".
Biden is BFF with the State. The People,on the other hand, are his enemy and he's working rapidly to replace them with hordes of illegals.
Water is wet. Sun to rise in the east around 6 AM.
Trump is not even an announced candidate for President.
Biden IS President.
Not remotely comparable.
Plus Trump didn't say that about Biden's followers.
Imagine Trump taking the higher ground, behaving classier than the Democrats. It is literally impossible to imagine. He isn’t capable.
Poor mikey
Trump didn’t use the FBI to censor his political enemies. Or direct OSHA to get people fired for not getting their jabs
But yeah, Trump’s uncouth behavior is what should concern Libertarians.
Trump did incite a mob to riot and attempt to interfere with the peaceful transition from his Presidential administration to the winning administration. Libertarians should be very concerned about that.
Trump did use the CDC to enforce a moratorium on evicting people who weren’t paying their rent. Libertarians, and rental property owners, should be concerned about that.
On top of all that, he spent his every waking hour acting uncouth.
Mike Laursen's Handy Guide to Incitement
Not incitement:
"there will be blood in the streets” - Loretta Lynch
“Who says protests have to be peaceful“ - Cuomo
“There needs to be unrest in the streets” - Ayanna Pressley
“Protesters should not give up” - Kamala Harris
“I just don’t know why they aren’t uprising all over this country“ - Nancy Pelosi
“You get out and create a crowd and you push back on them, tell them they are not welcome“ - Maxine Waters
“I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh: You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions!” - Chuck Schumer
"(the Supreme Court is) Illegitimate! Illegitimate! Into the streets! Into the streets! - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Deadly incitement:
“Go home with love and peace, remember this day forever“ - Donald J Trump
Since we're all friends here we also won't point out that the FBI informants who started the "riot" did so 20 minutes before Trump's speech was over.
“Trump did incite a mob to riot and attempt to interfere with the peaceful transition from his Presidential administration to the winning administration.”
The fuck he did you lying sack of dog shit.
I guess ther FJB administration is not really pro-choice.
Pregnancy doesn’t spread by mere respiration as COVID-19 does.
My body my choice only works for abortions.
This is basically the mantra of the left now.
Funny that Mike repeats it.
Well, not so much funny as revealing.
A disease being airborne does not mean it "spreads by respiration". Holy Christ you are fucking retarded. Also hilarious since you spent the first year and a half of COVID telling us that it spread by sea, air, land, touch, smell and taste as needed to support whatever fascist shit you were required to support that week.
Trump was so authoritarian he told people to decide whether they used a face diaper or not!
He only has to be himself to behave classier than the current Democratic leadership.
Wow! Just wow! Warped perception.
You’re a lying dogfaced pony soldier.
I simply report what I observe.
Yes, exactly, it’s not your fault that your perception is warped.
Exactly. Why does Ejercito watch all the lying original video and read the sources, when he could gain "true perception" by reading ActBlue missives like you.
Mikey is a real piece of work. I dare say he is worse than Mary Stack.
True class is leveraging a billion taxpayer dollars to make sure your crack addict son who fucked his 14 year old niece in between visits to hookers can keep his $100k/mo job on the board of directors of a foreign energy company which he got despite not having any experience with foreign policy or energy. We don't want any crass lowlifes staining our cherished institutions with their lack of classiness.
Do you enjoy being a notoriously discredited, lying shitweasel? Or is that you just can’t help yourself?
Why do you support child molestation
With televangelists drooling on him?
Do televangelists even exist anymore outside of YouTube? Hank's so old.
No, you drooling here, asshole.
Did you get banned at Truth Social?
You don't have to imagine it. Just listen to Biden's speech.
You mean like Mittens Romney and John McCain did, and the left still called them Nazi fascist white supremacists just like they did Trump? It's almost like getting on your knees and shoving any available Democrat's cock in your gullet is not actually all that classy, and that when you're fighting against a mob of dirty street thugs you're better off grabbing the nearest table leg to use as a shillelagh than getting stabbed through the heart while you're still lacing up your gloves and waiting for the referee to start the match.
The only correct way to deal with a democrat involves swift blinding force.
He was the Democrat who said Mitt Romney...Mitt freakin' Romney... was going to put black people back in chains in 2012. Biden did not fall far at all. The media was gaslighting itself and the country over what Biden is and always has been.
Fuck off you anti- American, anti-liberty, marxist scum.
Good of you to use Leftist propagandists of Politi-fact as your source, tells me you have no interest in truth or reality, just propping up DNC talking points. Your ignore the unconstitutional changes to voting, the irregularities in late night votes in Democrat strongholds and that most of the cases were tossed because of standing or because the ballot weren't distinguishable anymore on purpose, not based on the facts and merits.
You stand behind every Democrat political and legal abuse and expect anyone to see you as anything but a DNC propagandist? Go to hell, just don't take me with you.
Now go back to talking about peaceful arsonists and how pedophiles are "very fine people" or perhaps defund the police (because without cops there would be no crime reported) is more your speed. It is lying "journalists" like you gaslighting the country that are driving the division and hate more than anything done by a politician.
most of the cases were tossed because of standing or because the ballot weren't distinguishable anymore on purpose, not based on the facts and merits.
It's still the case that about 1/3rd of cases were decided on the merits, in some of the other cases dismissed on standing the judges nevertheless commented adversely on the merits, Trump-nominated judges were no less likely to find against Trump than any others, that in court pro-Trump attorneys specifically stated that they were not alleging fraud - which is significant, and that when Texas went to the SC, the Trump amicus brief specifically did not allege fraud.
Well thats just wrong.
_________
In any case, this leaves us with forty-two (42) lawsuits relevant to the 2020 Presidential election where a judge has ruled (or hopefully will rule) on the merits. The results so far are:
c) Nineteen cases are completed (adjudicated). These are where the court heard arguments, considered evidence (where applicable), and then formally ruled on statutory issues (e.g. the legality of a state’s election process), etc. Of these:
i) Eleven cases were WON by Trump, et al, and
ii) Eight cases were lost by Trump, et al.
d) Twenty-three cases are still active and have not yet been decided — so the ultimate winner and loser of these cases has not been determined.
https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021/02/03/2020-presidential-election-lawsuits-the-facts-n320913
=======
And if those remaining 20, about half were dropped and the others almost went exclusively in trumps favor. These included the wisconsin Supreme Court and multiple judges ruling against election changes made by various states and towns.
You really are ignorant shrike.
SRG isn't a TDS-addled lefty shit like sarc isn't a TDS-addled lefty shit.
I feel like this lie is exposed on this site almost every day lately.
Your "source" is for shit. It provides no links to primary sources - and is dated 2/3/21 - before some of the cases had been decided! Did you even notice the date, peasant?
I know you don't like Wikipedia - because it provides links to primary sources, and "sources, we don't need no stinkin' sources" when they might disagree with your fond beliefs. But FFS, get a clue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election
Lots of links to the actual court docs.
Now fuck off.
Peasant?
Party of the working class, folks.
Shh, you are messing up the “we never got a chance to present the overwhelming evidence” narrative.
Embarrassing.
Posts this right after factual information. All the fake centrists defending democrats lie.
Let's see: On one side we have Big Tech, the Corporate Media, the Billionaire Boys Club that owns Dominion Voting, and the zillionaire backers of the Globalist Regime, and on the other side we have some conservative moms who got raided by the feds and the My Pillow guy. The CIA couldn't figure out how Venezuela kept rigging the elections. But luckily for the Dems, Dominion owns that technology now. https://tinyurl.com/yakfvptn
Are you seriously putting forth the Venezuelan conspiracy theory? Seriously? Are any of his fellow conservative commented here embarrassed by his comment?
This from the guy that just lied here about Trump's "enemies of the state" comment.
And no... do you seriously believe that Venezuela wasn't rigging its elections, White Mike?
Give him a day or two to come back and corpsefuck the thread after he's had a chance to escalate this query to the tier 2 support supervisor at the Media Matters chatbot center.
It's still the case that about 1/3rd of cases were decided on the merits
Do you have some sort of evidence or report you can link to that demonstrates this? I did a little search right now and came up empty, but I'd be very interested in reading about it.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court did rule that the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) gave inappropriate advice in its guidance to local elections clerks that drop boxes are a valid way to return an absentee ballot. It also ruled that no one can return a ballot in person on behalf of another voter, according to state law, despite what the WEC may have told local officials about allowing ballot harvesting.
What they said basically, was that "If Wisconsin wants drop boxes and ballot harvesting, the legislature knows how to write laws to allow them..."
Specifically:
¶49Third, the legislature knows how to write a statute accomplishing the work DRW would have Wis. Stat. §5.06 perform. SeeState v. Yakich, 2022 WI8, ¶24, 400 Wis.2d549, 970 N.W.2d12 (explaining plain meaning may be derived by looking at differences between two statutes and noting "the legislature knew how to draft [different] language"
...
¶53Subchapter IV of chapter 6 of the Wisconsin statutes begins with a statement of legislative policy that cannot be reconciled with the statements of policy contained in WEC's memos:
LEGISLATIVE POLICY.The legislature finds that voting is a constitutional right, the vigorous exercise of which should be strongly encouraged. In contrast, voting by absentee ballot is a privilege exercised wholly outside the traditional safeguards of the polling place. The legislature finds that the privilege of voting by absentee ballot must be carefully regulated to prevent the potential for fraud or abuse; to prevent overzealous solicitation of absent electors who may prefer not to participate in an election; to prevent undue influence on an absent elector to vote for or against a candidate or to cast a particular vote in a referendum; or other similar abuses.
The statutory requirements governing absentee voting must be completely satisfied or ballots may not be counted:
INTERPRETATION. Notwithstanding s. 5.01 (1), with respect to matters relating to the absentee ballot process, ss. 6.86, 6.87 (3) to (7) and 9.01 (1) (b) 2. and 4. shall be construed as mandatory. Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be counted. Ballots counted in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election.
§6.84(2). "[M]andatory" election requirements "must be strictly adhered to" and "strictly observed." State ex rel. Ahlgrimm v. State Elections Bd., 82 Wis.2d585,592–93, 263 N.W.2d152 (1978).
¶54Despite these provisions, no defendant can point to any statute authorizing ballot drop boxes; instead, the defendants argue no statute expressly prohibits them. The absence of an express prohibition, however, does not mean drop boxes comport with "the procedures specified" in the election laws. Wis. Stat. §6.84(2). Nothing in the statutory language detailing the procedures by which absentee ballots may be cast mentions drop boxes or anything like them.
B. The Merits
WEC's staff may have been trying to make voting as easy as possible during the pandemic, but whatever their motivations, WEC must follow Wisconsin statutes. Good intentions never override the law.[25]
[25]Justice Ann Walsh Bradley accuses the court of "erect[ing] yet another barrier for voters," dissent, ¶205, but to the extent any "barriers" to voting exist, they are of the legislature's making. Establishing rules governing the casting of ballots outside of election day rests solely within the power of the people's representatives because such regulations affect only the privilege of absentee voting and not the right to vote itself. Justice Ann Walsh Bradley says "[a] ballot drop box is a simple and perfectly legal solution to make voting easier[.]" Id., ¶207. While they might be a simple solution, the decision to devise solutions to make voting easier belongs to the legislature, not WEC and certainly not the judiciary. While the dissenters would permit ballot drop boxes, the court must respect the constitutional restraints on our power and refuse to act as a super-legislature. It poses a grave threat to democracy to mislead the people into believing we are one.
So, the type of insignificant mistakes that occur in any national election… Yawn…
Insignificant huh? Just voting laws. Who needs them says Mike.
Dee: No courts have ruled against election law changes.
Also Dee: The court ruling against this election law changes are normal.
Any national election without some kind of secure voting system. You know, like the ones most European countries use.
But please, go on how you’re a “libertarian”.
It’s funny that the Republicans won the majority of WI Congressional seats by the same ballots but the Republicans never challenged those results.
Not really if you understand the argument being made instead of being a lying piece of shit.
Here’s Mike Liarson lying. He’s aware that not everyone in the state of Wisconsin has the exact same ballot. Depending on your precinct, you have a different ballot, from township/city proposals, to school board members, to country sheriffs to…members of congress.
The claim isn’t that house districts throughout the state won by Republicans had a bunch of illegal ballots with Biden selected as president were counted. It’s that there was a bunch of precincts within Democratic strongholds, already electing democrat representatives, had illegal drop boxes and vote harvesters, paid for by Mark Zuckerberg, that had a highly questionable number of absentee votes for Biden.
Don’t think this was a mistake by Mike Liarson. He knows how this works. He’s a liar for the Democrat party. And his lies are easy to spot once you realize he’s a liar.
There's also that ungainly fact that tens and hundreds of thousands of ballots were "discovered" during and after the vote counting was supposed to have been suspended with no downballot offices filled out and only Biden selected but we're all friends here so we'll just focus on White Mikey's more egregious lies.
If she’s squawking, she’s lying.
Well, actually they did. They challenged thousands of ballots in their entirety as having been illegally cast.
And in those court filings did they ask for a remedy of not counting the ballots in general, or only not counting the ballots for the Presidential race?
¶129 The holding in Trump requires a vote cast in reliance
on a document produced by the WEC's staff to be counted even if
the vote's counting is unlawful under the statute the staff
purportedly interpreted. The majority did not ground its
decision in constitutional law but in equity.
The majority grievously injured the rule of
law in Trump, which the court should acknowledge and correct.8
A majority of this court defenestrated the people's ability to defend their laws. Trump should be overruled to restore the people's
supremacy over their public servants.
All to be ignored by the “No courts ruled against the election” crowd. It’s like talking to a wall with these fuckers.
You can't restore the people's supremacy over their rulers.
That would be a threat to democracy.
ANOTHER "We Wuz Robbed" whiner? Take a number somewhere else, crybaby. We already know both halves of the looter Kleptocracy would lie, cheat, steal and murder their moms for an extra chance to rob and murder us. You're the whole reason the LP was formed in the first place!
Now do your crying over the Mises caucus sending you and your friends to the dustbin of history. You utterly failed to move liberty forward for decades, resting on your laurels of “spoiler votes” in some fantasy elections before I was born.
It’s time to take your antipsychotic medication and eat your apple sauce and shut the fuck up, Hank. I sincerely believe you’re to senile to realize it, but you’re a tool for authoritarianism.
Kicking your pathetic mewling ass and depriving you of ever winning a single federal elected office wasn't the whole reason the LP was formed, sarcasmic, it's just the most satisfying. You should have stuck with the Anthony Comstock/God's Own Prohibitionist shtick you stole from Hankie. You're somehow worse when you try to improvise.
It's still the case that you posted dark web links to hardcore child pornography and got your original Sarah Palin's Buttplug handle banned, shreek.
I don't know how anyone could have thought Biden would be a unifier, anyway. There was almost nothing on his platform that could reasonably be sold to conservatives. It was "Build Back Better," with massive new spending and subsidies for green energy, along with expansions of Obamacare. He ran on mask mandates, on raising the minimum wage, on reinstating the Paris Climate Agreement, on expanding free university education and national public pre-schooling.
I don't see what part of his platform could be used as an olive branch to conservatives. Some of Trump's policies actually appealed to some deep blue unions because he said he'd bring manufacturing jobs back to America. Biden didn't hedge by saying he wanted investigations into 2020 rioters and Antifa, and he didn't hedge by saying he'd stop "illegal" immigration while trying to expand "legal" immigration. He didn't hedge by saying he'd refuse to sign a mask mandate.
If you cast yourself as a unifier, you need to actually hold a position where you can realistically build a coalition that isn't just your allies.
Be fair. Subjugation to a massive state authority with comprehensive plans for every aspect of life and a grand utopian vision is a type of unity.
Well, yes. You could say that Lenin was a unifier, Stalin and Mao were as well. So was Castro and Pol Pott.
You might say that Nicolae Ceausescu was a unifier, however, he unified an entire nation against him and look what that got him.
The only problem is that in order to unify a nation, you have to exterminate all those who oppose such unity.
Leftists try reeducation and psychiatry first. Only when that fails do they move on to extermination.
Democrats have already started the first two steps.
Enver Hoxha in Albania was a REAL unifier! His soulmates the Kim family are keep up the unifier tradition in North Korea (shush about the divided peninsula comrade, or you’ll find out what unity is!)
Well said. Sadly, this level of thinking is lost on the far left progressives that are, Reason Editors.
He mumbled it in a speech which got a warmed over translation from the journalist class.
I don't know how anyone could have thought Biden would be a unifier, anyway.
He wasn't a unifier. He only appeared slightly less crazy than his democratic cohort and the "Didn't constantly denounce white supremacy enough *and* constantly wave the pride flag incessantly enough" straw man he was propped up against.
Britanica had Joe Biden and other Democrats figured out decades ago when they defined "projection".
projection - the mental process by which people attribute to others what is in their own minds.
ALL altruists do nothing else but project.
It's hilarious how you rage about altruists all the time and yet also hate everything about Objectivism and the things that Ayn Rand actually believed. It's almost like you're a drunken simpleton who struggled to read past the first page of Economics In One Lesson let alone a weightier midwit tome like Atlas Shrugged or even The Fountainhead.
The American people have witnessed what the left has brought to America: Riots in nearly every city by leftist anarchists, burning, looting, assaults on people and police. Billions of dollars in damage and destruction. The rise of a neo communist bloc/BLM and ANTIFA, who have been terrorizing cities for the past three years. The left is all for globalization. The left, especially the wealthy east coast liberals, have nothing but disdain for working people.
The MSM is dominated by the left, who made excuses for the violence by BLM and ANTIFA, who covered up for the Clintons, the Bidens and the Obamas while at the same time amplified everything that could damage Trump, knowing full well they were lies.
All this while working Americans who pay taxes were demonized as threats to the nation.
Those who simply want to be left alone are threats to America.
Those who believe in constitutional government are threats to the nation.
Those who believe in small government are threats to the nation.
Those who want to see America as great again are threats to America.
If you don't believe and support the socialist programs the left plans to inflict on America, your are a threat.
No one has insured a republican sweep this November more than dementia Joe. I hope the republicans win every election which will enable them to impeach Biden and Harris and clean out the rat's nest in the White House.
“I hope the republicans win every election which will enable them to impeach Biden and Harris and clean out the rat's nest in the White House.”
It would splendid if it were that easy to extinguish lefty authoritarianism. The problem is, the dangers reside in the idea itself, and in its steady contagion.
The stench of it is everywhere. I wouldn’t mind if it were just in their shoes. On under their toe nails. But it’s in their hair, breath, brain and soul. It’s caught their collective spirit. The poor bastards are polluted.
Whether it’s in social media, academia, the MSM, the intelligence community, the state dept., the DOJ, or the celebrity-cultural enclaves, the saturation of the left’s authoritarianism stinks up the place.
The things saving us as I see it are federalism, the military and SCOTUS, and traditionalists like Trump.
The bad news: authoritarianism succeeds best by capturing not just minds, but also the institutions. And It’s knocking on those doors.
It would BE splendid…
Trump isn’t a traditionalist. He’s a narcissistic, amoral grifter who found a gullible political constituency he can milk for attention and money.
Notice Mike Liarson never discusses Trump’s policies, just his personality that hurts his childish feelings?
And then accuses everyone else of being emotional.
Does Trump actually have any policies? What I hear mostly is whining about not being treated fair and request for people's money. In 2020 the Republican Party did not even have a platform. Can you distill anything he says into some kind of meaningful policy? I don't think you can.
He was president for four years, feel free to go back and look at some of the policies he enacted if you don’t want to look like a dumbass.
The problem is that if I look at the four years it hard to tell any real policies. More like a hodgepodge of talks and actions. For one thing the administration had no message discipline. So, you might here one thing in morning and then the opposite in the afternoon. The former President was a confidence man and so it was all about message and not policy. You can point to things but nothing that suggest policy, rather just random acts.
I think your problem is more related to your gaslighting and education level. It is very easy to see his policies. Read his EOs. Look what he campaigned on. It isnt difficult.
Not just a matter of its education -exposure to ideas, but of bias, ignorance, and low intellect. It has typically pushed for policies and 'solutions' that run counter to its arguments, that are in no way moderate. I'd argue m4e makes excuses for its preferred politician/policy versus gaslight, but I generally ignore what it says.
I’ve argued M4E is a really good parody.
It wasn’t hard for me.
Also, he actually did attempt to pass policies the first year or two, THEN for his last couple of years lost interest and focused on nothing but whining about his personal grievances.
"THEN for his last couple of years lost interest and focused on nothing but whining"
In the last several years he renegotiated a new North American Free Trade pact, negotiated a pull out with the Taliban, instituted the First Step Act, and arranged peace between the Arabs and Jews, and Serbs and Kosovars, all while fighting of a fraudulent impeachment based on lies cooked up by the Clinton campaign.
But Mike swears he's not a Team Blue mouthpiece.
Meanwhile, something happened his last year in office, that was magnified beyond reason by…people who’d already stated that they would do anything to get him out of office.
“It’s the economy, stupid” is a well known phrase about predicting elections. And Democrats throughout the country did their best to shut down the economy.
M4E has no problem looking like a dumbass.
You can suss out his policies from his actions.
Trade:
Got rid of NAFTA and negotiated the USMCA.
Rejected the horrific TPP
Got rid of more regulations than any president since Carter.
International Affairs:
Attempted rapproachment with the DPRK
Negotiated Afghanistan withdrawal with the Taliban
Negotiated peace agreement between Serbs and Kosovars.
Negotiated peace agreements between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, Morocco, Oman and Jordan. Initiated rapproachment between Israel and Saudi Arabia.
First president not to start any wars in forty years.
Disavowed the Paris climate bullshit.
It's not like he got the Saudis, UAE, and a few other middle eastern countries to agree that Isreal had the right to exist
In the form of you and the retards like Brian Stelter who feed you your opinions, I guess. Your entire personality would collapse in on itself like a black hole without Trump's leg available for humping every waking moment of your life. I honestly can't wait until he kicks off, because it will literally kill people like you. You can't survive without the orange man living rent free in your head.
“Trump isn’t a traditionalist.”
He brought back “Merry Christmas.” Stop complaining.
Not helping his case. I’m a Halloween man myself.
No, you're not.
Because real 'halloween men' are very cognizant of the fact that the push for a winter festival to kill Christmas is followed by the fall festival, whose intent is to kill Halloween.
So, Trump is no different than Obama or Biden?
"...Even for those of us who agree that Republicans are a flawed bunch defined by their loyalty to a wannabe caudillo,..."
Do TDS-addled piles of shit expect the rest of us to buy into their fantasies and lies?
Eat shit and die, asshole.
It's quite telling that Reason Editors always make statements like this about the Republicans, but rarely do so towards the Democrats. The reason, they hate icky conservatives and Republicans because Reason Editors are: far left progressives that pretend to be libertarians.
I'll keep saying it until they prove me wrong.
Wow I guess no matter how much totalitarian crap is actually implemented by the present executive "Reason" can always counter with J6?
Man with horns on head walks through Capitol. CP shoot unarmed protestors and Reason is absolutely not allowed to even write about it. J.D.?
You guys know that there were riots after Trump's inauguration? That there was a mob attack on the white house?
Are we referring to Ashli Babbitt, who was trying to break into the Speaker’s Lobby at the head of a mob with apparent intent to harm the Vice President, Congress members, their staff and guests? Are we talking the Capitol Police who had no way of knowing what arms or other weapons that mob might have?
They had every right to shot for trespassing on public property, amirite?
Uh the politicians had been evacuated from the Capitol before Trump's speech was over because of the pipe bombs the planter of which the FBI apparently has no interest in catching.
BTW I think it was a woman.
Those "bombs" were never intended to go off.
They used one-hour kitchen timers and were found several hours after they were planted. I made stuff like that when I was a kid, of course not with explosives. I liked having lights turn on and off by themselves and watching the looks on adult's faces when it happened.
It's easy to make a timer that works. If a ten year old can do it, then so could the "bomber". If the bomb didn't go off, it means that either it was never intended to, or else, the Republic is threatened by some one who literally isn't "Smarter Than a Fifth Grader".
If you doubt this, do a web search on "Jan 6th Pipe Bombs" and look at the pictures.
The Capitol was evacuated nonetheless.
Did she have a fire extinguisher? How are you this embarrassing when the video exists. You don't have to lie with a narrative. This is more retarded than your attacks on Rittenhouse and state lines.
Youre a leftist fuck.
who had no way of knowing what arms or other weapons that mob might have?
Shoot first, look later.
Thank goodness Mike's not a cop.
Maybe he is….
By mob, you're referring to a small group of people surrounded on both sides by heavily armed agents?
No, we are referencing Ashli Babbitt, who was having a polite conversation with the 4 SWAT team members with their full-auto M4 rifles at the ready less than 10 minutes before she was shot in the face by a racist black cop who was cowering behind a book case like a pathetic little bitch pretending to guard a room in the capitol with not one single politician in it despite both of her unarmed, empty hands being fully visible and gripping the sides of a window frame while those same SWAT members stood less than 10 feet behind her and didn't think she posed a threat and didn't shoot her. Hope that helps, Nazi.
Not to mention locking people up for 12 months without trial for trespassing on public property, cutting them off from social media, and demanding loyalty oaths. Not one peep on those civil rights violations?
Too local.
Back in the distant year of 2020, Joe Biden called voters “a lying dogfaced pony soldier” “fat” and various other insults. He challenged one to a push-up contest and one to a fight out back. He talked about the threat of white supremacists.
But he told the media he would be a unifier, and they, including Reason, repeated that talking point like good little propagandists, despite half a century in Washington to indicate otherwise.
Lol
You’re bad at this.
But he makes it up in volume.
Taking Democrats at their word, without question - Reason Editors.
Democrats most dominant character strength --- PROJECTION....
Whatever they do; they blame on someone else...
Occasionally, Biden steals a page or two from others as well…
Too little, too late?
"CNN staffers ‘freaked out’ new CEO is purging the woke"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTX_KKme934
Nice job pandering to your MAGA readers. Looks like they're eating it up. Their movement attempted to overturn a democratic election. Nothing Biden has done is comparable to that. By the way, look up "whataboutism," it applies here. Known tool of authoritarians and you're using it.
How do you overturn an election with no guns?
Well, kicking your feet up on Nancy Pelosi's desk is worth 500 guns. They're all lucky the death penalty was taken off the table. Nothing more sacred than Nancy Pelosi's desk. Well, except the Capital Building itself, and abortions.
Remember the Maga rednecks carry guns every where! Except to a coup attempt
you're just a sad sad little mind...
sad
"Nice job pandering to your MAGA readers."
Stuff your TDS up your ass, shitpile. Your head wants company.
Yer dumb
You're a brownshirt.
Stuff your TDS up your ass, shitpile. Your head wants company.
@ john_bunyan
10 minutes of dems questioning elections.
https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1565480585715408896
But of course, that’s not “insurrection”. Just ask CNN, MSNBC, and the Reason editors.
There's nothing wrong with contesting the results of an election. That's what the court system is for. Trump brought it before every single court he could think of and none of them ruled in his favor. Guess what that means? You lost.
And you MAGA morons always think anyone who criticizes Trump must love Hilary and Biden. No, we're not like you. I don't fly a flag devoted to a shitty businessman on my truck. No one who loves freedom would fly the flag of a single politician. That's CCP type nonsense. There's nothing libertarian about Trump, you are all easily manipulated fools. And yes, Biden is marginally better. But unlike you, I don't turn what I perceive to be the lesser of two evils into my whole personality.
Trump brought it before every single court he could think of and none of them ruled in his favor.
So youre retarded too. He has won nearly 2 dozen with multiple states ruling election rule changes were illegal.
How are leftist the most uninformed people on the planet?
As for his libertarian policies.
No new wars. Troop reductions.
Tax breaks.
Ordered executive dept to cut 10% of their budgets, but they formed a resistance instead.
Ordered 2 regulations removed for one added, but again resistance.
First Step Act
Increased domestic drilling and energy.
You retarded leftist fucks should stop coming here. You know nothings hurt your side more than anything else.
Lol. And biden is better? You went full retard.
https://reason.com/2022/09/05/in-philadelphia-joe-biden-peddled-a-competing-brand-of-authoritarianism/?comments=true#comment-9687157
There's nothing wrong with contesting the results of an election
There's that leftist repressive tolerance again.
Now tell us about the Reichstagsfire and the Dolchstoss! Come on, you know you want to! Fascists cannot take over a country without stupid little brownshirts like you, john_bunyan.
Whataboutism like pretending a riot was an insurrection when discussing the long history of abuses, ugly policies and laws put in place by their favored politician? You are correct, authoritarians are using that as a tool. After all, you just did it yourself, fuckwit.
You posted hardcore child porn on Reason.com and got your Sarah Palin's Buttplug account banned, shreek. Maybe you should just shut the fuck up and be glad that there isn't a hole in your head with a bunch of diarrhea where a brain should have been leaking out of it.
I see someone didn’t read the article. Or the comments for that matter.
Drive by lefty assholes can fuck off, slaver.
1/6 was obviously a setup orchestrated by Ray Epps and his FBI cronies who took down barricades, fencing and no trespassing signs before Trump's speech was over. The cops also opened the doors to the Capitol. There's videoof a cop moving barricades and waving people in. Ignoring all that is disingenuous.
When did Trump make it known he wanted to be a warlord? He's the only President in decades who didn't start a new war. Is he a libertarians dream nit by a longshot but let's not get hyperbolic about his governance.
Oh yeah have you seen "2000 Mules" JD?
But IT, he called the media an enemy of the state and all those mean tweets. Words are violence!
Not violence, like no new wars, BUT WORDS ARE REAL VIOLENCE!!!
He didn’t call the media the enemy of the state. He said they were the enemy of the people.
Which they objectively are seeing as how they are tools of the establishment and not liberty.
Don’t play into White Mike’s lies.
Even for those of us who agree that Republicans are a flawed bunch defined by their loyalty to a wannabe caudillo, Biden's alternative is just a different brand of authoritarianism.
One could watch Brandon’s speech from 09/02/22 and claim the fucking Democrats are a different brand of authority than a “wannabe caudillo”?
WTF?
That sentence you quoted pretty much says the same thing you are saying, so what’s your complaint?
Whoosh! ( again)
I’d like to thank you for your pendantics in this case.
The author calls Trump a “wannabe caudillo”, while Brandon certainly has taken the actions of a bona fide banana republic dictator.
So perhaps the author and I do agree after all. Thanks again!
Meant to reply to ML.
Yes, you two do agree. I agree with you, too. Both sides, for real.
Except it's only "both sides" for you whenever the Democrats get caught doing something truly vile.
Otherwise you're saying this:
The White Knight
January.6.2021 at 5:07 pm
It is now crystal clear Trump is a monster. If you still support him, you are a bad person. There is no ambiguity, no wiggle room anymore.
Mike Laursen
July.31.2021 at 12:03 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
White Knight pointed out, correctly, that you are very logical, but quite unaware that you often engage in not seeking out information that goes against your narratives, garbage-in/garbage-out logic, and not checking your conclusions for basic sanity. You should have listened to White Knight.
I can't imagine how he thought he was tricking anyone. Especially after he made such a big deal about switching his nick.
'Donald Trump and the Republican party represent an authoritarian threat to this country.' When trump's rhetoric and obnoxious behavior shifts to actively censoring opposing views, farcical show trials and lengthy punitive pretrial imprisonment for rioters, and nearly 5 decades of the same dishonest bullying, then you can try your both sides argument. When trump has nearly 5 decades of promoting and supporting laws and policies that have led to the current economic jugfuck, that pushed national civil asset forfeiture, that led to the current racial 'crisis' in policing, then you can trot out your tired canard. Trump's behavior and rhetoric is often immature, but he has only been on the national political stage since 2015. Bias does not magically make his impact or potential the equivalent of DC insiders.
'Donald Trump and the Republican party represent an authoritarian threat to this country.'
Well, they did (not) shut down businesses, did (not) shut down schools and churches, did (not) shut send people to die in nursing homes and then did (not) lie about the deaths, did (not) tell you what to wear on your face, did (not) mandate you get jabbed with a vaccine which seems largely ineffective, and did (not) shut lie about the effectiveness of those face diapers!
See all that stuff those "authoritarian" R's did (not) do?!
Orangemanbad was the worst literalhitler ever. And the GOP should be ashamed, for allowing the (D)s to consistently be the party that tramples on rights instead of being the whitenationalistracistsexisthomophobetransphobeIslamophobe oppressors we are assured that they are.
But we're still within normal parameters with the adults back in the room right JD? Right?
Don't forget, no mean tweets.
Far more important than reigning in the EPA, right?
Reason Rundown
President Biden Says He'll Attend Detroit Auto Show Because He's A "Car Guy"
Also Biden: “We will take, literally, millions of automobiles off the road — off the road, saving tens of millions of barrels of oil, dealing with cleaning up the air. This is not hyperbole; this is a fact.” [video]
And NASCAR fans like the Big Guy too.
“Let’s go Brandon!”
He's more of a bicycle guy.
It’s ok for him to have cars.
Not you.
Reason Rundown
Chile saves itself.
Chileans overwhelmingly reject new socialist constitution
Oh, good.
Chileans overwhelmingly elected a fat socialist millennial retarded "student leader" when their subway fares went up. They do not seem to think too far ahead.
This seems newsworthy.
Local story.
If they elected a far right leader, we'd get a few articles telling us how horrible their country will become. A far left progressive leader, nothing to see. Huh, I wonder why Reason Editors would not see a problem with a far left progressive leader of Chili. Hmmm.
Reason Rundown
IRS to 120K taxpayers: Oops
OOPS or OPS?
IRS to 870,000 taxpayers: prepare for your audit.
Reason Rundown
Buttplug hardest hit
Federal Oil Leases Slow to a Trickle Under Biden
President, citing climate change, spurns resources his predecessors relied on to boost U.S. energy production
That’ll make a dent in Shitplug’s rig count.
Huh. Cannot figure out why gas prices are so high. Must be Trumps fault.
Reason Rundown
Buttplug hardest hit
‘Why shouldn’t it be as bad as the 1970s?’: Historian Niall Ferguson has a warning for investors
Historian Niall Ferguson warned Friday that the world is sleepwalking into an era of political and economic upheaval akin to the 1970s — only worse.
Speaking to CNBC at the Ambrosetti Forum in Italy, Ferguson said that the catalyst required to spark a repeat of the 70s — namely inflation and international conflict — had already occurred.
“The ingredients of the 1970s are already in place,” Ferguson, Milbank Family Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, told CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick.
Great. All we need is disco and bell bottom jeans.
The corporate music and the clothes are already shittier than disco and leisure suits, and there's no hard rock, punk or heavy metal on the horizon.
Reason Rundown
Chemjeff hardest hit
Drake U. diversity training has ‘opposite effect,’ leaves students ‘traumatized’
For twenty years progs have been training students to be Great White Racists Hunters, now they pivoted to accusing them of being incorrigible and unrepentant racists themselves.
Do they know that Governor Francis Drake was a Republican? Shouldn't they change their university's name? And someone might confuse it with Sir Francis Drake, the British Imperial naval officer responsible for subjugating most of the world?
They prefer to duck the whole Drake issue.
What you did there, I see it.
Competing brand? Really, both sides crap? There's only one of these two actually peddling authoritarianism, and it's emanating from the far right and those in the moderate right who go along with it. They want to actively squash any ideas that compete with theirs, and candidates who propose something different than their corporatist and fascist ideas, and their former President here made it known that about half the country is their sworn enemy
Literally just copied Troll logics post and switched the parties.
Do you imagine you’re being clever or sneaky?
I think the fucker thinks he is. He isn’t. Of course, since Happy Miser is a progressive, he doesn’t have original thoughts and has to plagiarize from others.
Shreek is used to interacting primarily with 8 year old boys and only to lure them some place where the chloroform won't be easily smelled by passersby so he thinks the same tactics that works in that context will also work in the grown up world.
How?
How is authoritarianism "emanating from the far right"?
The "far right" aren't the ones censoring speech, keeping troops in the capital, deplatforming dissent, illegally seizing bank accounts, weaponizing the IRS, using the FBI to illegally spy on political opponents, raiding political opponents homes, creating Ministry of Truths, ad nauseam...
So how are they being authoritarian?
And this is the question that no one on the left will answer.
And that explains Reason's silence
That is bullshit. Republicans want smaller government and states rights. That is literally the antithesis of authoritarianism and fascism. Even the "far right" in the US just wants to be left alone with their "guns and Bibles".
Authoritarianism in the US is the almost exclusive domain of the Democrats and the left, and it isn't limited to the "far left". Democrats want to run every aspect of people's lives from Washington: what is taught in schools, what skin colors get hired into what positions, what cars we drive, what food we eat, what news we hear, how much money we earn and spend, what we spend it on, etc.
And with that, Democrats are returning to their fascist-sympathizing roots.
Face it, Happy Miser: you are a fascist sympathizer. At least have the decency to admit it to yourself and the world.
Thus bleateth the sheep. GFY.
Plagiarize much?
“Plagiarize much?”
He prefers to call it “Follow The Leader.”
"Competing brand? Really, both sides crap?..."
One more RTDS-addled steaming pile of shit.
Eat shit and die, asshole.
Breaking:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-grants-trumps-request-for-a-special-master/ar-AA11uwXe
I look forward to Reason’s coverage.
He had nuclear secrets -sullum
I heard they were nucular—not to split atoms
Trump’s attorneys argued in a recent court filing that “left unchecked, the DOJ will impugn, leak, and publicize selective aspects of their investigation with no recourse for [Trump] but to somehow trust the self-restraint of currently unchecked investigators…
The Justice Department had argued against the request, saying that a special master “is unnecessary and would significantly harm important governmental interests, including national security interests.”
“Significantly harm important governments interests” indeed.
“Significantly harm important governments interests”
We should be so lucky.
Important government interests like how the FBI decides whom to investigate.
“Significantly harm important governments interests”
Well, we better trust the government's word and shut this down. We ALL know Trump is literally Hitler, so he's guilty. - Reason Editors
Competing with what?
Oh, I see, Tuccille is still suffering from TDS and still peddling progressive propaganda.
The "divides" in the US were created by the Democrats, foremost under Obama. That's because over the past 20 years, Democrats embraced progressivism and neo-Marxism. Trump didn't create those divides, and Biden can't do anything about it because that's the core of the Democratic party now.
More Both Sides mush from the fauxbertarians at Reason.
Biden: “Everybody that opposes me is an enemy of the state”
J.D. Tuccille: “Well Republicans say mean things too”
Well, Trump said the media is the enemy of the state. That's WAY worse than calling half the country terrorists.
True libertarians side with the Republican Party!
True libertarians side with the security state!
Mike Liarson is above partisan politics. He’s a neutral observer. He also thinks anyone questioning the federal law enforcement and intelligence community apparatus of the current (and previous Democrat) administration going against the administration’s political rival is ok. Because he’s on record stating that political rival and all his supporters are evil. But he’s neutral. Just ask him.
Since I insist on operating in my own self- interest, nothing is a bigger threat to me than the democrats’ hatred agenda against successful, high earning people.
What do you mean? They just gave 10 grand each to doctors and lawyers earning up to 125K.
Poverty.
To be fair, he just wouldn't have energized the base if he had sold himself as a doddering shithead.
He also sold himself as a serial hair-sniffer, but that seems to have gone over pretty well.
A 30-minute taped interview now and then from his bunker didn't do much energizing. Apparently enough to energize them to fill out a ballot and mail it back, or at least let someone else do it for them.
One of Reason's favored Republicans is calling you un-American if you criticize the government.
https://tinyurl.com/aa66ecdk
Haha, Adam Kinzinger. Neo-con, never-trumper.
Trumps said:
Donald Trump, in his first rally since the FBI searched his Florida home in August, stoked anger against law enforcement even as federal officials have faced an increase in threats. He called the FBI and the Department of Justice "vicious monsters."
Adam says:
Every Republican owns these words unless they explicitly denounce them. Every one. You can’t call Trump your leader and pretend you didn’t hear them.
Me:
Imagine having TDS so bad, that you defend the current state of the FBI and DOJ. Unbelievable. (Looking real hard at Reason Editors.)
It is just like defending the current state of the Chicago PD.
I denounce them, the FBI and doj are beyond vicious monsters. They are all subhuman cancers.
Kinzinger is an idiot. You know what his reward from the Democrats was for his help on their witch hunt? He got gerrymandered out of his district by them.
The only solution in career useless person land would be some sort of committee to investigate 'un-American' activities. Seems pretty likely Kinziger is interested in a seat on it. Not that this sort of thing has ever happened before, or would be a gross violation of civil liberties in line with the rest of the bullshit that Kinziger and his DNC pals support.
I like my criticisms of a no shit fascist dictator making speeches right out of supervillain movie scenes to reference Trump as much as possible, lest we forget his refusal to lock the country down during the pandemic. Oh, and his aggressive federal prosecutions of rioters who burned our cities for a year straight. And the hearings. Don't forget the hearings.
"President Biden is right that Donald Trump and the Republican party represent an authoritarian threat to this country. "
Tucille, you are a lying sack of shit. You might think this crap is getting you somewhere, but I'll bet Koch doesn't even know your name.
Thanks. That makes 98 comemierda fascistas I've had the pleasure of muting and mooting,
So you've been here a while, but are so embarrassed by the posts under your former handle that you're hoping those who learned to ignore your TDS-addled bullshit might give it another look?
Eat shit and die, asshole.
Post the list, sarcasmic.
Meant for sarcasmic dba Libertariantranslator obviously.
Got it, but sarc is far less facile with the language; s/he's simply a stupid shit.
This is an oh, so clever pile of TDS addled asshole. Could be brandy shit, but regardless, it is a steaming pile of TDS addled shit far too embarrassed too admit to former posts.
What comment could you possibly post that would suggest Libertariantranslator to be other than a steaming pile of shit? Nada.
Are you claiming sarcasmic is Hank Phillips?
Because libertariantranslater is Hank Phillips.
I'm saying the handle "Libertariantranslator" is sarcasmic doing a Hank Phillips pastiche. And he was doing a damn good job of it for the last few months right up until today. Tell me you've ever once seen Hankie make a South Park reference or type "We Wuz Robbed!" and then tell me you've ever seen sarcasmic go more than 24 hours without making a South Park reference or typing "We Wuz Robbed!" I gave him his due. He actually got me with this one. But ultimately he just can't help himself.
Noted. I’ll keep an open mind going forward. Either possibility is possible, and they’re both garbage.
Tucille is just another lying never Trumper cuck. Please name one "Authoritarian" policy or comment from Donald Trump. You can't because there aren't any. The democrats on the other have proposed and talked about nothing but authoritarian policies and rhetoric. You're a lying, clueless sheep.
JD just doesn’t like “mean tweets” so therefore, by default, Trump is authoritarian. JD would be more productive if he whacked off instead of writing.
Who says he’s not whacking off while he writes his TDS addled screeds?
Aaaah, thanks! That makes 99 republican nationalsocialist sphincters I've had the pleasure of muting since the feature became available. Reason's comments haven't been this relevant, urbane and literate in ages.
Fuck off and die, TDS-addled shitpile.
Yep. Definitely sarcasmic. He's got his mute list back out. And yet somehow on a site with fewer than 100 registered users commenting on any given day has managed to post 25 replies in this thread alone to people who he has supposedly already muted.
I'm not sure who will be happier when the cirrhosis finally kills you, sarcasmic. Me or the daughter you spent a decade raping before your wife took her away from you.
So you do think it’s sarc. Are you claiming that sarc has always been Hank Phillips, or that Hank Phillips is no longer posting here and sarc took over the moniker?
Seems to me if sarc took over Hank, he’d throw in a bunch of random “comstock” references because he’s stupid.
Libertariantrans has peppered in Comstock before. That’s why I started calling him Hank in the first place.
Right, but if it was sarc it’d be in every post. In my mind it’s clearly Hank.
https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/who-is-hank-phillips/
"Please name one "Authoritarian" policy or comment from Donald Trump. You can't because there aren't any. The democrats on the other have proposed and talked about nothing but authoritarian policies and rhetoric."
But, but Trump said mean things on Twitter! He called the media "enemies of the American people!" He's literally Hitler!!!
And, and, on J6 Trump personally instigated an un-armed insurrection against the most power country in human history. (Not even one F-15! Just zip ties and automatic fire extinguishers!) People died! (Protesters died at the hands of police, but they DIED!!!) Nancy Pelosi's desk was violated!!! And icky MAGA conservatives broke windows and took selfies! They delayed the POTUS certification but a day. A DAY!!! THE HORROR!!! Our democracy almost ended.
“I like to take the guns first” is pretty authoritarian, but the best he ended up doing was banning bump stocks.
The natural instinct to "balance" both sides is strong, yet, only one side is cancelling academics for not towing the woke line. Only one side is weaponizing the FBI and the IRS. Only one side has called for sabotaging the integrity of the Supreme Court and trashing the 1st and 2nd Amendments to the Bill of Rights, and, in an op-ed in the NYTimes, has called for the replacement of the Constitution. Only one side is indoctrinating school kids with fake history and biology, and driving a wedge between kids and parents. I could go on, but you get the idea. There is no equivalence here.
There is. Y'all are illiterate looters unaware there is a non-altruist party peopled by folks who know the definition of government, it's proper function and what is a right. Looking at looters alone there is only the unidementional RightAndLeft. But the full context reveals a whole nother dimension in which vices aren't crimes and looters are hanged.
You're a fucking TDS addled pile of shit who should fuck off and die.
We already know you in a fictional dimension, sarcasmic.
The tired "calling a bigot a bigot is bigotry" angle, long embraced by bigots, misfits, and the right-wing losers of America's culture war.
This is no problem replacement won't solve.
Oh look, it’s everyone’s favorite leftist, bigoted, jackass clinger.
Do us all a favor and fuck off.
D-
You're really just mailing it in. No bitter clingers or telling us non-progressives that you and Democrats are our "betters". Your hateful heart just doesn't seem to really be into your posts any longer.
Fuck off and die, asshole bigot.
... long embraced by bigots, misfits, and the right-wing losers of America's culture war, i.e., fascists like Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland.
"calling a bigot a bigot is bigotry"
Yeah, that's the woke. I think the Kirkland subroutine needs debugging.
By now, hopelessly corrupted.
In order to replace anyone, wouldn't you need to actually convince a woman to have sex with you Incel Kuckland?
Needs moar raging homophobia!
Sadly, the author of this article doesn't possess either the honesty or the integrity to recognize that what was being protested by Trump and the handful of rioters on Jan 6th (who were only a very small percent of the people who came to the Trump speech) is that there were many indications that the vote count in several key districts had some definite abnormalities and indications of shenanigans.
It wasn't that we were upset by the legitimate votes, it's that we were looking at all the indications, the hundreds of signed affidavits from eyewitnesses, the very loose balloting that occurred and the numerical and statistical anomalies. We just wanted (and still want) a full and accurate forensic analysis of those ballots in those key precincts - something that was denied to us despite the evidence that something untoward had occurred.
The author (as well as some commenters) also seems to possess an acute case of Trump Derangement Syndrome in claiming, absent evidence, that Trump was as authoritarian as Idiot Joey the Marxist Puppet. Under Trump, our federal government was more aligned with the Constitution than it was prior or after. He did not support our federal government agencies acting in highly partisan manner, as his scumbag predecessor and successor have. If he has an argument, I'd like to hear it. Trump never gave a Hitlerian rant/speech like this one.
Translation: We Wuz Robbed! It Ain't Fair! They kicked sand in our faces... we're not really crying! Trump is Jesus, You'll See! Y'aw'll're gonna Bern in hell and Trump, Teedy, Hitler 'n me're gonna bully them bitches and laugh from the cliffs of Paradise, jist yew wait!
But thanks fake Tom Morrow for being the hundredth nationalsocialist sockpuppet on my moot list.
Translation:
"I'm a TDS-addled steaming pile of shit who should fuck off and die."
Yep, this is definitely sarcasmic. I have to congratulate you on holding out as long as you did running Hankie's shtick. First sock you've ever managed that fooled me for more than a few hours. If only you weren't so autistic, you could have kept that up almost indefinitely.
No, not me. Sorry. You're the one who uses a different name every week.
Isn't it interesting how "Libertariantranslator" had 16 posts in this thread while "sarcasmic" had not one single post in this thread until he magically showed up 12 hours later to hump my leg for calling his sock out?
Who is more dangerous? Someone whom the Deep State loathes and defied when he was in office? Or the Deep State's chosen spokesman?
Who do you want to fight? A man with an AR15, or a man with an F-15?
If you truly fear authoritarianism, then start looking at the relative power of Trump and Biden.
Giant Douche and and Turd Sandwich sockies are out in force to lynch Tuccille!
Giant pile of shit here brag about being TDS addled.
I'm starting to think this might be a sarcasmic pastiche of Hankie. In Hankie's world Anthony Comstock is still looming large and the Democratic Party majorities in 2/3 of the states were skinsuited by Republicans in order to pass the 18th amendment. He wouldn't know a South Park reference if it killed Kenny in front of him.
The “Deep State” is a MAGA fiction. Trump could have avoided all of this new mess by following protocols for secure documents, or by having returned all of the documents when asked.
Sure there's no Deep State. No lie based FISA warrants, no emails from bureaucrats to social media companies pushing for censorship, no special treatment for Hillary, no 501 C-3's denied because of political viewpoint, no, none of these things ever happened. Lois Lerner and James Comey were paragons of honesty, integrity and above moral reproach. Any one saying differently, is an enemy of the state
“You won’t have any problems if you do what the deep state says.”
/White “There is no deep state” Mike
Yep, that's it. You retarded fucks really need to make sure your Big Tech cronies do a better job memory holing the things you collectively decide don't exist.
Remember back when you were busy yucking it up with your chocolate messiah about what an out of touch boomer Romney was for saying that Russia was America's geopolitical foe? Even the noble Russia of 2011 had a "deep state".
Those MAGAs are so devious, they even went back to 2010 and described the UK as a "deep state" just to cover their tracks
Modhi is basically Trump according to Shikha Dalmia so I guess this probably qualifies as MAGA propaganda
Even cool kids like Antifascist Calling were using the term not so very long ago. Of course, that was also back when Wikileaks was a noble organization interested in the truth and not a dirty MAGA outfit.
The MAGAs have even posed as Canadian academics and published books 14 years ago just to set up the conspiracy! They're actually this devious!
Leave it to those MAGA racists to travel back to 1993 and plant this obvious racist propaganda in the Harvard Business Review!
You're going to have to offer some claims regarding what you intend before I'm clicking on 'look here, there's something I think is important!'
I was assured that orbital nuclear weapons didn't actually exist...
Holy shit!
Sevo, I think he was providing evidence to completely and utterly destroy Mikey’s retarded as fuck “there’s no such thing as the deep state and it’s just a MAGA conspiracy theory.”
Unfortunately, Mike is a piece of shit and a Democrat apologist (but I repeat myself) and so will never acknowledge these articles exist.
"Sevo, I think he was providing evidence to completely and utterly destroy Mikey’s retarded as fuck “there’s no such thing as the deep state and it’s just a MAGA conspiracy theory.”"
THX, but clicking on a series of blind links, well....
And THX for the name of the lefty shit in the gray box
So which side is the bigger threat to democracy?
The side that wants to check if the election was fair and the count was accurate, or the side that wants to lock up their main opponent, and spends 300 billion dollars by executive order as a gift to their supporters, without letting their democratically elected representatives vote on it?
We did all kinds of checks and audits and recounts. Stop whining that it didn’t change the results.
"We" did no such thing. Recounting forged ballots with no chain of custody that were allowed to be counted for a month before and after election night is not an audit in the same way that an accountant tallying up a stack of forged receipts or counting the Parker Bros bills in the vault is not an audit.
Tuccille, we get that the Turd Sandwich and Giant Douche cliques are as violent and deceitful a twin-pack of looters as any anarchists who ever stretched a rope. But the LP has been successful in reversing their trends by repealing their unhappy usurpations and offering voters effective, leveraged solutions and alternatives to the initiation of deadly force. Grabbers-Of-Pussy go to any lengths to threaten women and increase prohibitionist asset forfeiture till the economy again collapses. Dems seek to increase looting but are not stupid enough to bully girls--at least not anymore. Worse is twice as bad as bad, but that too is old news.
Fuck off and die, TDS-addled pile of shit.
In case anyone wonders why I dismiss this steaming pile of TDS-addled shit so cavalierly, it is a result of his obvious abysmal stupidity.
You can dislike Trump, but regardless of his R label (so toxic to shitbag here), you are going to have to search back to Silent Cal to find a POTUS who did a better job of protecting freedoms, reducing regulatory over-reach and reducing foreign entanglements.
But dim-bulb assholes like Libertariantranslator hope those of us capable of understanding that improvement is good, even if it isn't perfect, will yield the moral high ground to him since he opposes both.
To Libertariantranslator, I can best offer a running, rusty chain saw up the ass. Since your head is already there, perhaps it might 'change your mind' so to speak.
You, you steaming pile of TDS-addled shit, are far, far, more dangerous to my freedoms than Biden, let alone the best POTUS we had for the last century.
To be fair to the senile demented old piece of shit, he still thinks Trump is in office, which isn't too bad considering that until this year he was still under the impression that Harry Truman was in office.
If only Truman were in office, as opposed to droolin' Joe!
Truman owns 'medical insurance from employer'; this was someone whose business experience was selling men's wear.
Droolin' Joe's 'business experience' is allowing his kid to sell access to the asshole.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/bidens-extremist-maga-claims-lie
An article without the Trump bullshit that ruins this article, plus some interesting other facts not mentioned here, again. Weird.
"...As Sam Harris recently disgustingly said, it wouldn’t matter if Biden had dead kids in his history, Trump must be stopped. “It’s not collusion if it’s out in the open” is a strange line to take when it comes to ‘protecting democracy’, but his attitude was (and still is) pervasive throughout the media..."
Somebody else (Brendan O'Neil?) also called Harris on his bullshit, but, while O'Neil writes for Reason, it go no coverage here.
Harris decided to double down on the stupid in response to the Philadelphia speech, saying that the lighting was a gaffe for Harris but was a glimpse into Trump's soul. (This is BEFORE the talking point coming out instructing the NPCs to mock the speech's haters by pretending it was about the color of the background)
Your better than the current crop of reason bitches.
You left out a major point that is out in the open and nobody brings up or debates
The dnc sued to remove the green party from ballots in key states, then sued to have the same rules lifted from themselves
Biden will never forgive Trump for challenging election results, but when he visited the Palestinian Authority, he didn't criticize Abbas for cancelling national elections.
I wonder how long the Reason writers had to spend on Google Images desperately trying to find photos from Biden's Nuremberg speech that had even the slightest hint of blue in them instead of the ominous black and red Darth Vader aesthetic that was actually displayed.
If the progs want a dictator, they will have to do a lot better than a nearly 80 year old milquetoast who looks like he needs to change his depends. I mean, I get that shoving your hand up womens’ skirts and sniffing hair is considered violence by some, but you have to imagine an authoritarian as someone who could really physically torture you. Hillary, yes! Joe? LOL! I was walking to a DC United game the other night and passed a butch looking young woman wearing a T-shirt that said “Peg the Patriarchy” That’s who the dems want as their dictator.
The false equivalence being peddled here is striking. None of the criticisms of Biden or Democrats are entirely off target, but fair criticism of Democrats is not the point Tuccille is going for. The point is to give libertarians reasons to continue voting for Republicans. So many around here bash Reason and its writers for supporting Democrats each time they give any criticism at all of Republicans, but the "both sides" contained in just about every article that does blunts that criticism to be about as effective at swaying opinion as a plastic knife would be at cutting lumber.
Reason, and libertarians generally, are doing nothing to break the two-party system with this kind of argument. They provide no third option or way forward to restore balance and civility to our politics. For all that Tuccille seems to lament that so many Republican and Democratic Party voters view each other with distrust and disdain, he is only feeding that sentiment.
Feeding it by taking about it?
He's not just talking about it. He's expressing his opinion that each side is offering a "competing brand of authoritarianism." Though he doesn't denounce Trump and his supporters in language as strong as Democrats do, he still repeated their point of view regarding Trump calling the election "stolen" being a "fantasy" and that Jan. 6 was a "riot" of his supporters rather than a mostly peaceful protest and/or a setup by Antifa. Democrats or whatever independents and moderates read Reason will still take away that they are justified in viewing the Trump side as evil and dangerous to their rights and to democracy itself.
He also repeats the point of view of Republicans and other Trump voters that Democrats are authoritarian, looking to censor them on social media, give away taxpayer money in an effort to buy votes, and forestall a debate on issues by demonizing Republicans. Anyone that views Trump favorably, even only in comparison to Democrats, is going to take away from this article that Biden and other Democrats are evil and dangerous to their rights and democracy itself.
Tuccille does nothing to push back on either of these narratives, instead giving each side further justification for their view of the opposition. Given that I'm sure that the overwhelming majority of Reason readers are Republican or vote for Republicans far more often than Democrats, all of this makes it clear to me that Tuccille is looking to further entrench those right-wing readers against the Democratic Party, and thus by default, supporting the GOP.
This is the lefty shit who justifies murder as a preventative measure to keep someone from putting a foot on a desk:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
In Philadelphia, Joe Biden Peddled Dictatorship
Biden and the Democrats want and are working towards a one party system, that is called a dictatorship.
Pretty words like "Authoritarianism" and "untruths" by Reason don't change that, they try to hide the fact.
Authoritarianism is a pretty word? That made no sense.
"Both sides" is a tired and debunked big L Libertarian talking point, but you can't seriously expect anyone to believe it when the Republican party is attempting to reduce the role of government and the Democrat party is not. Just because Rs expand it in a few areas like abortion doesn't mean they're the same. Ds never shrink government, at least not in a long time. That fundamental dividing line that government is the problem still exists.
How did Rs expand the role of government regarding abortion? All 50 states had or could have laws same as before. Just without the restrictions invented by Roe v Wade.
Thats not an expansion.
If you looked at Obama's track record you'd see he actually shrunk the number of public jobs and reduced the deficit.
But hey- don't let a silly thing like facts get in the way of your bullshit narrative. Last I checked it wasn't Dems continuously giving our already bloated military-industrial complex more money every single year either.
and that his supporters rioted at the Capitol
You mean...0.0001% of his supporters "rioted" at the Capitol (and that's using a ridiculously expansive definition of "rioted"). That's a smaller %, by at least a couple orders of magnitude, of BLM "mostly peaceful protests" that resulted in murders and mass property destruction.
Stop trying to downplay an insurrection you fucking traitor.
Stop trying to downplay an insurrection you fucking traitor.
How about you stop being a lying piece of shit, you partisan tool.
When Biden was elected, I joked that before the end of his term, there would be proposals to criminalize voting Republican.
Biden is one step away from such a proposal now, and I fear it's not even a whole step.
I don't like my jokes becoming reality.
Oh yeah, because it was Biden on 1/6 trying to overthrow the government.
Oh wait...that was the cult of Trump.
A group of rioters got out of control with no weapons, organization, or plan. There was no leadership and no intent to overthrow anything. This wasn't an insurrection by any understanding of the word.
It was almost precisely the same situation as the riots when Trump was elected, with two added problems that there were insufficient police and some police removed barricades to allow people into the building. These both seem to be deliberate actions taken to escalate the event.
It's telling that the January 6th hearing spent a lot of time on distant causes but didn't address the two elephants in the room, which are well documented.
These are all lies. They had weapons, were organized, and there was a plan. Hundreds of people don't just storm the capitol building by accident.
You believe every fucking loony tunes conspiracy theory Alex Jones shoves into your dickhole, but you can't abide the idea that the first attack on the US capitol since 1812 might have been organized?
While I'll grant that Trump was no libertarian, by the standards of recent Presidents he was hardly an authoritarian, either. Started no wars, got criticized for NOT issuing enough dictates in connection with Covid.
The butthurt over his speech is glorious.
Someone finally speaks truth to the fascist bullshit on the right and they all lose their minds.
Maybe stop doing fascist things and you wouldn't get called out for it. Maybe stop being in a cult and you wouldn't be called a cultist.
It's simple stuff really.
Yeah! We'll prove you wrong by declaring you terrorists and stealing your bank account! ha!
There really is no appropriate response to either you or Biden except: Go Fuck Yourself.
Cry J.D., cry some more.
"Competing brand of authoritarianism"
Biden's brand is, was, and always has been, authoritarianism. You're confused about who is competing.
Bothsiderism is cowardice but it pays the bills.
Don’t judge, they’ve got a family to feed.
For your own sexy experience with hot ladies in France check Chat Sexe Auvergne Rhone Alpes
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (dbt-012) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://cashprofit99.netlify.app/
Fraxion. For expanding enterprises, Fraxion is a cloud-based procurement software solution. By offering precise reporting, proactive spend monitoring, and total control over every stage of your procurement process, it can help you manage your procurement process more effectively (from requisition to payment processing).
https://www.businessbid.com