11,000 Federal Inmates Were Sent Home During the Pandemic. Only 17 Were Arrested for New Crimes.
Criminal justice groups say the numbers vindicate their push to keep those people from being sent back to prison.

Of the more than 11,000 federal inmates who were released to home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 were returned to prison for committing new crimes, according to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
In response to a query from Keri Blakinger, a reporter for The Marshall Project, the Bureau of Prisons said that of the 17, 10 committed drug crimes, while the rest of the charges included smuggling non-citizens, nonviolent domestic disturbance, theft, aggravated assault, and DUI.
A few days ago, NPR reported that only 17 out of the 11,000 federal prisoners released on home confinement under CARES were arrested for new crimes.
Today I asked BOP what those crimes were and here's a breakdown -- and the majority were drug releted. Here's the breakdown: pic.twitter.com/j2NwjWxTWZ
— Keri Blakinger (@keribla) August 25, 2022
Criminal justice groups that worked to keep those people from returning to federal prison say the numbers are vindication for them.
"For those of us who think there's too many people who are serving too long in prison, you couldn't ask for a more affirming number," says Kevin Ring, president of the criminal justice advocacy nonprofit FAMM.
"You hear demagogues a lot of times say that people in federal prison are the worst of the worst, and that's false. Anyone who's visited a federal prison camp knows that there's no fences around them, and that people stay on the honor system," says Ring.
"These numbers show that that's statistically false as well," he adds.
NPR reported that nearly 11,000 federal inmates had been released to home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic. The expanded releases were authorized by the massive pandemic relief bill passed by Congress, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, with the intention of reducing the spread and lethality of COVID-19 in federal prisons.
Those released early to home confinement began to rebuild their lives and reconnect with their families, but there was the question of what would happen to them once the pandemic was over. In the final days of the Trump administration, the Justice Department released a memo finding that once the federal government ended its COVID-19 emergency declaration, all of those former inmates with remaining sentences would have to report back to federal prison.
Groups like FAMM and the American Civil Liberties Union began pressing the Biden administration to reverse that decision. The White House initially declined to do so, instead announcing a clemency initiative that would have only targeted nonviolent drug offenders, leaving thousands of others, like white-collar offenders, to return to prison regardless of their conduct on the outside. However, last December the Justice Department reversed course and issued a new memo finding that the BOP had the discretion to leave them on home confinement for the remainder of their sentences.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.), one of the most pro-incarceration members of the Senate, wrote that the reversal "betrays victims and law-enforcement agencies that trusted the federal government to keep convicted criminals away from the neighborhoods that the offenders once terrorized."
"Federal incarceration keeps notorious criminals far from their communities and thereby limits their capacity to maintain their criminal enterprises and their ability to intimidate victims and witnesses from the inside," Cotton continued.
But the reality for the thousands released on home confinement was uncertainty and fear that they would be ripped away from their families again for inscrutable or petty reasons. For example, a 76-year-old woman on home confinement was nearly sent back to prison for missing a telephone call from prison officials while attending a computer class.
NPR reported that of the more than 400 people on home confinement sent back to prison for technical violations, more than half involved alleged alcohol or drug use. For example, NPR profiled the case of Eva Cardoza and her fiancé Eric Alvarez, who had been struggling with heart problems and colon cancer while also caring for their five children before Cardoza returned from prison:
In June 2021, Alvarez and Cardoza took a 90-minute cab ride into the Bronx, so she could meet with staffers in charge of her supervision. Cardoza, who had tested positive for marijuana, never came out of the building. Alvarez ended up forking out $433 to cover the hours the taxi meter ran as he waited in vain.
Cardoza's return to prison turned the family upside down. She's now been back at Danbury for 14 months. Alvarez said she never got the chance to explain herself or challenge that single positive drug test.
"That's just mind boggling to me," Alvarez said. "Where is the judicial system? Where is the fairness? Where is the 50-50? I don't see it."
NPR reported today that, hours after its story aired, a judge released Cardoza due to "extraordinary circumstances."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You hear demagogues a lot of times say that people in federal prison are the worst of the worst, and that's false. Anyone who's visited a federal prison camp knows that there's no fences around them, and that people stay on the honor system," says Ring.
That is probably false. It's state prison and the county jail where the worst of the worst probably are.
Despite demagogues, pretty much everybody knows the "White collar vs. pound-me-in-the-ass" prison meme.
Weird how federal prison sounds a lot like social distancing... with less rigorous enforcement.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (ati-10) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
This sounds more like a counterfeiting confession than an income opportunity.
Yeah, federal prison is a lot of people who committed unremarkable crimes but made the mistake of crossing state lines in the process.
A lot of those people wouldn't be in jail to begin with if they had stayed in 1 state, they'd be on probation or in some diversion program. That would explain the low recidivism rate, it's not a bunch of hardened career criminals that got let out.
What it really says is that federal sentences are too long. Of course for us, most of the things they're in for shouldn't be illegal to begin with.
Alternatively. the fact that only 17 of 11,000 were arrested for new crimes indicates how unlikely it is to be caught committing a crime.
I agree, there's a statistic given and then a reason is jumped-to that I'm not clear is supported.
I hope it's true though. I'm growing concerned that the mass incarceration of the 90s is also responsible for the large drop in crime in the 90s. That concerns me a lot.
When you see a statistic like this, such an overwhelming number, I’m immediately suspicious of something going on. I am on board with reducing prison populations, removing penalties for nonviolent drug crimes, and sentencing reform, but something like seems too agenda-affirming.
How many of those 11,000 how been on home confinement less than 3 months? How well are we keeping track of their activity? What types of crimes were they in for? How did they choose whom to release? Did we stop enforcing those crimes? I just don’t feel like we’re getting the whole picture.
Well, if they live in California, there is not much they can be arrested for.
It'd be interesting to know what offenses those 11,000 were jailed for. I doubt many of those released were violent criminals.
Most of them were being punished for blowing, in an unauthorized manner, on cheap plastic flutes!
To find precise details on what NOT to do, to avoid the flute police, please see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/DONT_DO_THIS/ … This has been a pubic service, courtesy of the Church of SQRLS!
Speaking technically/legally, what's the difference between releasing a federal inmate to house arrest under state or nation-wide lockdown and simply releasing them to gen pop. within any given prison?
We released 11K burglars back into communities where we'd locked everyone inside their homes and none of them committed burglary!
Move the reply button to the right side like the rest of the internet.
It’s only been a year.
I'm actually willing to believe this is accurate. 11k prisoners, most likely chosen for their unlikelihood to commit more crimes, were released. I think this could support the argument that people are in jail too long, or that their crimes were bullshit. It's hard to tell from the limited data, but it's not a bad point to make.
Additionally, don't forget that a lot of federal crimes are not easily repeatable.
If you were running a Ponzi scheme, defrauding investors, or lying to the IRS, you aren't going to be trusted with money or authority ever again. For most internet crimes, one of the conditions of release is that you cannot even have access to the internet. If you were insider trading, you aren't going to be so stupid again. These people are literally incapable of performing these crimes again.
Of course these people are considered low risk, so they are first in priority to be released.
Crimes of rage, instability, desperation, and addiction are state level crimes.
Only 17 Were Arrested for New Crimes.
The other 10,927 died from Covid.
The other thing is if you are in Federal prison for embezzlement or something, you probably aren't going to reoffend because no one would hire you for a job where you'd have the opportunity to. The purpose of prison time is to punish the convict for having committed the crime in the first place, not just to keep him from reoffending.
Not released from federal prison, but.....
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/local/virginia/rape-suspect-washington-post-alexandria-crime/65-13310ff6-43bf-444d-acc3-e229d7699b6b
I remember many stories like this. While I still question the accuracy of the claims in this article, it works hard to ignore the recidivism of non-federal prisoners let out in the same circumstances
I wonder how many of them had to wear ankle monitors.
The correct term is bear traps.
I wonder if this will apply to Trump.
He'll be released and then re-arrested in an investigation into a plot to deny the fact that Biden shut down COVID and that he violated the terms of his sentence by failing to disclose that he'd been vaccinated to the FBOP.
I'm guessing most of these inmates were non violent offenders. And they were essentially put under house arrest.
A prisoner who's under surveillance at home has more incentive not to break the law. I'm assuming they have to report back to their parole officer on occasion. They're still incarcerated, just under more humane conditions. As long as criminals remain IN JAIL, an NOT ON THE STREETS roaming around free, society remains safe. Of course Reason reports on this, but ignores stories about criminals who commit 17 crimes after being repeatedly released.
If the argument is for sensible sentencing and private prisons, I'm all for it. But criminals justice reform shouldn't be about "let's make life as easy as possible for those who break the law!" Gascon lets off a kid who tried to run over a mother who was taking her baby out for the walk.
My Daddy said: “Son, you gotta be good or not get caught. Not getting caught *again* is a lesson learned.
DA’s aren’t prosecuted anyone….numbers are shit
So that's really three crimes and 14 vices and failures to cringe obediently enough.
Prison is considered to be society's biggest failure. Not American, not Western, and not modern. It does nothing to rehabilitate criminals, but instead tends to do the opposite by socializing people with other criminals and actually making them better at being criminals. It only gets worse once they're released and find that finding a job when you have a criminal record is almost impossible, so in order to provide for their families ex cons can find themselves returning to crime as their last alternative. Large use of home confinement for non-violent criminals is a good first step, as would be better initiatives for getting ex cons back into the workforce. It's just funny that sociologists have been saying this for decades, but it took COVID for them to actually see that it works.
First, we don't put people in prison JUST to prevent them from committing more crimes. Prison is also punishment. We go to the trouble of setting sentences according to the perceived severity of the crime, and then you just wipe out those sentences on a whim?
What of the cops who risk their lives to apprehend these criminals in the first place? Why shouldn't cops just sit back and take the paycheck if their work is going to be wasted?
And of course, just because they haven't been caught yet doesn't mean they aren't committing crimes. Does anyone really believe that people who have gone so far down the anti-social road that they get themselves not just arrested, but sentenced to prison suddenly Come To Jesus because you've decided to be nice to them?
The US recidivism rate is something like 67% with reincarceration around 50%. That raises the question: why aren't these people reoffending? Is it changes in law enforcement? Who they selected to release? (Crime declines rapidly with age.)
Reinforces the longstanding point that certainty and speed of incarceration are more protective than sentence length in protecting the public.
Yeah? And how many have committed crimes but haven't been identified...or are suspects but are still at large? You don't know, do you CJ, but that doesn't stop you from writing a bleeding heart sob story about all the poor grandmothers who are languishing in prison for not keeping their sidewalks shoveled during the dead of winter!
You like to point to the misdemeanors, but how many of those "misdemeanors" were pled down from much more serious crimes by lazy prosecutors or, worse yet, by a Soros shill? If, or more accurately when, one of these released nice guys happens to murder another human being, will you rethink your position? If not, how many murders are you willing to endure before you do?
The problem, CJ, is that you and the rest of the woke, bleeding heart virtue signalers don't live in the neighborhoods where these criminals live...you live in gated enclaves where you don't have to put up with their crimes, threats and intimidation. Since you have no problem loosing 11,000 plus criminals upon those already struggling to survive, here's an idea...why don't you go live in one of these neighborhoods (aka: Projects) for awhile and see for yourself what their lives are really like before you go churning out virtue signaling pieces of tripe for the likes of Salon, The Daily
Caller, and others of that ilk?
You've got to be pragmatic with this. The risk reward analysis is highly dependent on what type of crime was committed. Someone who had half an ounce of pot or committed tax evasion is more likely to elicit an overall benefit from release than a murderer or wife beater.
This does not mean what the author wants it too mean.
How to Lie With Statistics by Darrell Huff, Illustrated by Irving Gels
Um yeah, how about we only count statistics like this if overall reports of crime are down that year too.
You can't count a stat like this when during the same window property and violent crimes are off the charts, and DAs aren't bothering to prosecute and cops aren't bothering to investigate or stop crime.
Odd that it is vital we throw the book at people for "parading" on 1/6...
Sounds like the cops are slacking.
There are several reasons for incarceration.
Only one of those is to protect society from the convicted person from committing crimes by keeping them behind bars. Suppose some pervert rapes 100 eight year old girls but before being captured suffers an unfortunate (well, in this case, maybe fortunate) accident with a chainsaw that removes his twigs and berries (rather than those on the mulberry tree he meant to cut down) rendering him incapable of being a repeat offender. Should he now get no prison sentence once convicted?
There is also the deterrent aspect. The risk of long prison sentences will cause some people to decide not to commit a crime in the first place.
There is also the rehabilitation aspect.
And, don't forget the retribution aspect -- victims of a criminal will often feel better if the criminal pays some price including incarceration or even execution. Yes, in some cases that's "revenge", but its often the only way that the criminal can/will do anything to even slightly ameliorate the impact their crime had on the victim.
*twigs* -> *twig* (except for those with a very unusual mutation!)
“It has been said that if child abuse and neglect were to disappear today, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual would shrink to the size of a pamphlet in two generations, and the prisons would empty. Or, as Bernie Siegel, MD, puts it, quite simply, after half a century of practicing medicine, ‘I have become convinced that our number-one public health problem is our childhood’.” (Childhood Disrupted, pg.228)
__
But then American prisons are very profitable for their private-sector CEOs and shareholders.