Denver Police Hurt 6 Bystanders in a Shooting. So the City Cracked Down on Food Trucks.
The police admitted wrongdoing, but Denver moved forward with a plan to reduce crowds and crimes downtown—by targeting food trucks that did nothing wrong.

In the wake of a recent shooting that left six bystanders injured by Denver police officers, officials were looking for a way to keep the order in the city's Lower Downtown district. Hoping to reduce crowds—and crime, the logic went—the city moved to ban food trucks from operating in profitable late-night weekend slots.
At 1:30 a.m. on July 17, Denver Police Department officers were monitoring the crowds of people departing nightclubs. They witnessed an altercation involving Jordan Waddy, with one officer observing that he "may have had a firearm concealed in his hoodie or waistband." An officer saw Waddy "reaching into his waistband or pocket in a motion consistent with pulling out a firearm," so the cops began to shoot (bodycam video later revealed that Waddy removed his handgun from his hoodie and tossed it to the ground). Six bystanders were injured in the ordeal.
Following the shooting, Denver officials wanted to find a way to combat crime downtown. So even though the police admitted that something went wrong "from a tactics standpoint," the city moved to ban food trucks from operating in Lower Downtown on Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays. Officials "touted moving food trucks off those streets as one way to decrease crowds, chaos and crime," according to the Denver-based outlet Westword. Food truck owners were instead forced to park blocks away from the area, much further from the bars and their crowds. The truck owners say they weren't consulted, and now worry about how they'll stay afloat without the profitable weekend slots.
"Ninety-nine percent of the trucks down here are owned by immigrants, people who speak broken English, who have much more limited access to resources than a bar or restaurant," Sanjin Mutic, owner of a gyro food truck, told Denver's 9News. "If we're speaking about 20 food trucks, you're likely most likely looking at 30 to 40 families that rely on a livelihood from down here."
"Food truck owners often come from disadvantaged backgrounds. They also tend to have less money and fewer political connections than other business owners," Justin Pearson, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice (IJ), a libertarian public interest law firm, tells Reason. "Sadly, this makes them an attractive target when powerful city officials make an embarrassing mistake and are looking for a scapegoat."
Last week, IJ sent a letter to the Denver City Council raising concerns about the lack of logic and potential unconstitutionality underlying the food truck ban. "Although recent violence in the neighborhood supposedly motivates this ban, it is undisputed that food trucks had nothing to do with the violence," wrote Pearson. Since food trucks—but not other brick-and-mortar businesses—are barred from operating, Pearson argued that the ban raises "a host of constitutional concerns, ranging from equal protection to arbitrary enforcement."
Following the letter, a Denver Police Department representative announced that food trucks would be allowed to operate in Lower Downtown again starting August 25—but only six spots will be made available and they'll have to leave by midnight. Food truck owners will have to apply to occupy one of the spots, but they're already reporting that the city's application portal is glitchy. The Institute for Justice continues to push for a full repeal of the ban.
"Food trucks make neighborhoods safer, so the last thing you should ever want to do from a public-safety standpoint is ban food trucks," says Pearson. People will still be congregating and intoxicated in Lower Downtown, given that bars aren't being forced to close. And, according to a 2012 IJ report, food trucks often serve as "eyes on the street," which can help prevent crime and promote public safety.
Despite partially lifting its punitive ban on food truck owners, Denver continues to unjustly target them. "This ban is crushing the food truck owners, even though it is undisputed that they did nothing wrong," says Pearson. "When you ban businesses from going where the customers are, they go out of business."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ridiculous. And un-American, given that food trucks are a great modern American institution, and stand for American values in the best way.
By attracting crime?
Money attracts crime. We should make having money illegal?
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I have not ever thought like it would even achievable however my confidant mate got 13,000 Dollars only in four weeks easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail. Look extra details
going this web-page… https://incomebuzz7.blogspot.com/
You should set up a food truck
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (anu--216) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
We should make having money illegal?
The IRS is working on that.
Huh. Usually people say crowds on the street deter crime, so they try to figure out how to increase them.
crowds on the street deter some crimes, but encourage others. The police were worried about shootings occurring as the bars and clubs let out. Up to a point, crowds will discourage property crimes, but the presence of many, many people drunk, high, or just cutting loose increases the risk of violent altercations.
Perhaps the voters should install some Democrats in the council chambers.
A statement from Council Member "Debbie" Ortega:
You see, that "acceptance" of uncivil behavior is Trump's fault. Trump MADE Antifa burn down our cities.
#DefundThePolice!
FYI, if you read carefully here, what she's saying is we need to reform the reforms we put in in 2020. When you're calling for Reform less than two years after reforming the system... that's an object lesson in "be careful what you wish for".
I think it's probably good evidence for more incremental reforms rather than radical change. People poo-poo tinkering with the system too much. Radical reform often causes bad outcomes because most ideas are bad.
"Radical reform often causes bad outcomes because most ideas are bad.
And incremental reforms don't suffer from this bad idea problem because...?
Reform can go two ways. Reform that involves giving people more power usually ends badly. Not sure how the other kind of reform would end, since it never happens.
Incremental reforms are smaller and don't have a long trail of dependencies that all get screwed up at the same time.
And there's less inertia to overcome when things go bad - big reforms are backed by big egos and big egos can't admit they were wrong.
And incremental reforms don't suffer from this bad idea problem because...?
Because the damage done will be minimized.
When we roll out a new process, application, system etc., on our corporate network, we push it to limited test groups... incrementally. That way, if it turns out we were retards and didn't think something through, we didn't break the global network.
++
You see, that "acceptance" of uncivil behavior is Trump's fault. Trump MADE Antifa burn down our cities.
Yeah. Specifically cites 2019-2020, during Trump's Presidency, as "following the Trump era". Rural hicks in flyover country made Trump President which forced Denverites to murder each other 50% more often.
And here I thought Fiona was a one-note Immigration Uber Alles Reasonista.
Good to see she is embracing another aspect of the Holy Reason Trinity - Food Trucks
Food trucks run by immigrants.
Specifically. Because if they were run by non-immigrants ... well fuck 'em.
are owned by immigrants Strike one.
20 trucks? strike two.
Food trucks make neighborhoods safer, strike three.
So far in 2021, according to the DPD's Denver Crime Map, at least two murders and 22 aggravated assaults have taken place along a one-mile-long stretch of Blake, with eight of the crimes occurring in the 1900 block.
Enough is enough. Disperse the trucks and you disperse the crowds who are pouring out into the streets liquored up, etc.
People are going to go down there and get hammered and do stupid shit whether there's any food trucks or not. If you don't want crowds of drunks you should close bars, not food trucks.
It's not the food trucks that made the neighborhood to unsafe - it was the police.
The answer, clearly, is to drop a nuclear bomb on the city and kill everyone in it. Crime will drop to zero instantly and stay there for a thousand years at least.
Problem solved!
wheelbarrow full of burritos will sell just the same.
Exactly.
As a much younger man I at more than my share of bacon wrapped hotdogs cooked on push carts during beery evenings in Tijuana.
we did that on Fridays in '87/'88 I still have a $2 woven beach blanket
Same. I probably saw you there. We had several haunts, but we'd often try to pick up girls at Club A (99cent Sex on the Beach Saturday nights) and after we struck out we'd bar hop and eventually end up in Rio Ritas.
Sad thing is, Rio Ritas is now a boutique hotel, coffee shop, and art gallery. I weep for the younger generations. They know not what they've missed.
Problem: Police see no problem with shooting into crowds and killing innocent people.
Solution: Crack down on things that draw crowds, like food trucks.
Brilliant!
This should succeed as well as banning ice cream to reduce the number of rapes.
Every summer, the sales of ice cream go up, and the number of rapes goes up.
Obvious solution? Ban ice cream.
the "logic" of democrats.
Everybody spread out! We don't want anyone to get hurt as our officers fire recklessly and inaccurately in direction of the crowd!
Seems like some basic firearms re-education is in order for the Denver police.
Rule #4 “Be Sure of your target and what’s beyond it.”
Good grief. Civilians are BETTER than cops in many of these instances!
the "logic" of republicans
Democrats support police accountability, therefore any and all policy proposals to reign in abuse of power by officers of the law must be opposed in principle.
Except that they do not support police accountability.
Hence why the food trucks are forced to move and maybe the cops get to take some time off for training courses - with travel and per diem.
Neither believes in police accountability. If the cops gun people down in the streets republicans will shrug because you can't have law and order unless the police are allowed to create their own lawless mayhem where none previously exists while democrats will burn down a gas station across town to send a message to... someone... about white supremacy... or something. Either way, nothing happens to the cops.
Pretty much.
And you wonder why you get shit.
Denver is run by Democrats, so the post you replied to is at least referencing the people who actually were in charge at the time of the problem.
There are no Republicans in Denver. There are no Republicans mentioned in the story at all. And yet here you are, reflexively bashing them while ironically lamenting that people aren't thinking and just bash people out of principle.
There are worse ways to spend your time, but not dumber ones.
Sorry you lost my support right here. ""Ninety-nine percent of the trucks down here are owned by immigrants, "