Biden's New Bureau of Prisons Director Won't be Able To Run Away From the Agency's Corruption
The federal prison system is plagued by corruption and civil rights abuses.

We last saw outgoing Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Director Michael Carvajal running down a stairwell on July 26. He was trying to get away from some Associated Press reporters who revealed systemic dysfunction and corruption within the federal prison system—an apt ending for his tenure.
https://twitter.com/mikesisak/status/1551973375114989571
Carvajal had just finished testifying before a Senate subcommittee conducting a bipartisan investigation into corruption and abuse at a federal prison complex in Atlanta. Congressional investigators found that senior leadership at both the complex and the BOP had been aware of the issues for years.
With Carvajal jogging his way out of office—his resignation was announced in January—it will be Colette Peters' turn to sit in the hot seat. The Biden administration announced last month that it was tapping Peters, the director of Oregon's prison system, to head the beleaguered BOP. Previous directors have almost all come up through the agency, so the choice of an outsider is a signal in itself that the administration has lost faith in the BOP leadership.
Peters has told the Associated Press that she wants to "create an environment where people can feel comfortable coming forward and talking about misconduct." That will be no easy task, and she won't be able to outrun the problems she's inheriting. Corruption, dysfunction, and civil rights abuses have infected every level of management in the large federal agency.
"From sexual violence and medical neglect to understaffing and years-long lockdowns, the BOP's leadership has allowed a humanitarian crisis to develop on its watch," Kevin Ring, president of the criminal justice advocacy nonprofit FAMM, said in a press release. "Families with incarcerated loved ones have been begging for change."
Last month, the head of the local BOP employee union at FMC Carswell, a federal medical center for incarcerated women, told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that—as the newspaper summarized it—"upper management at the prison covers up reports of misconduct by supervisors, retaliates against staff who file complaints and violates federal law by not honoring contract negotiations."
In February, an Associated Press investigation into FCI Dublin, a federal women's prison in California, found "a permissive and toxic culture at the Bay Area lockup, enabling years of sexual misconduct by predatory employees and cover-ups that have largely kept the abuse out of the public eye."
Reason reported in 2020 on allegations of three cases of fatal medical neglect at FCI Aliceville, a federal women's prison in Alabama. The daughters of one woman who died in Aliceville, Hazel McGary, said they had been calling the prison for months trying to get help for their increasingly sick mother.
"They ain't do nothing," Kentiesha Kimble told Reason. "They laughed at her. They said she was faking. They told us she was too young to be having a heart attack."
The story also included a former inmate at Carswell who recounted watching a woman in a wheelchair die from a heart attack after being turned away by medical staff several times.
In 2019, 14 current and former inmates of a federal women's prison in Florida filed a lawsuit saying guards subjected them to unending sexual abuse and threats. The suit also claimed that prison leadership created a "sanctuary" for guards who were known sexual predators. The federal government later settled the suit.
Congressional investigators released a report in 2019 finding that serious misconduct at BOP is "largely tolerated or ignored altogether."
USA Today reported in 2018 on staffing problems that resulted in prison nurses and other auxiliary staff being pressed into guard duty.
The COVID-19 pandemic only exacerbated the problems within federal prisons. There were extended lockdowns, months of nothing but cold and paltry food, and allegations from both correctional officer unions and inmates that the BOP had deeply botched its response to the virus.
Reason reported that the first female federal inmate to die of COVID-19, Andrea Circle Bear, was transferred to federal prison despite being pregnant. She was admitted to a hospital less than a week later. She died several weeks after being placed on a ventilator and having an emergency cesarean section to deliver her baby. She was serving a 2-year sentence for a nonviolent drug crime.
"During Carvajal's tenure, the BOP has been a black box," Ring said. "When COVID began spreading in federal prisons and families' fears were at their greatest, Carvajal and the BOP somehow became less transparent. The BOP's opaqueness felt like cruelty. We hope the incoming secretary is prepared to make significant changes to a system badly in need of them."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Here's a idea. Stop putting so many people in prison.
Dems are hard at work trying to do that, unless you were at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
Those guards gotta guard somebody, and the woke prosecutors aren't doing their share.
I made $30k in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
.
Reading this article:>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com
They can't; that would be an admission that they have been putting too many people in jail.
I would love to see a comparison among the US, Canada, the UK, couple of EU countries. The US has a 2-3 x higher murder rate, but all EU countries have 4-4 x the violent crime rate. So ....
* First, an honest discussion of the difference in how major crimes are defined -- murder, rape, assault, theft.
* Second, what the theoretical range of prison terms is.
* Third, the actual range of prison terms.
* How does parole affect this?
For instance, the US murder rate being higher is probably insignificant overall since murder is such a small part of overall crime. The much higher EU violent crime ought to throw a lot more people in prison, albeit for shorter terms.
My personal opinion is that most US prison terms are way too long; it seems the simplest way to change how many people are in prison. But I have no data to back this up or refute it.
Hey, Reason! Here's something useful you could report on. You don't have to do a deep dive. Most of these statistics must be available online. The hardest part might be comparing the different definitions of various crimes. Second hardest finding the true vs reported crime rates.
As an example of #1, I have read many times that the UK doesn't log a murder until there's been a conviction; they can find a body riddle with bullet or stab wounds, and it won't be a homicide until they find, arrest, and convict somebody. A most perverse incentive for lower murder rates.
Is this true?
Do other countries do the same?
It was ruled an accident, he fell down an elevator shaft, onto some bullets
but all EU countries have 4-4 x the violent crime rate.
What did you mean by this? Was that a typo on the range?
Ha! 4-5 x.
One thing that's long been a stereotype of the US is that we're pretty wild. In the popular culture we often valorize rule-breaking.
One assumption that underlies a lot of criticism of our legal system seems to be that, nation-to-nation, state-to-state, that the population effectively acts the same and thus only the rules in place can be responsible for the differences in prisons and such. I always wonder if that's true though. I think this isn't an either/or but instead is a mix of both, but how much I do not know.
That said, I'm always for less laws in general. Simplifying things improves many problems in government.
My personal opinion is that most US prison terms are way too long; it seems the simplest way to change how many people are in prison. But I have no data to back this up or refute it.
I think it's a combination of that as well as legislators passing law after law criminalizing the same thing. So even if the terms aren't way too long (which I believe they are), it amounts to the same thing when fifteen charges are stacked on top of each other.
If the punishment fit the crime, then people would risk going to trial. But it does not. Especially when prosecutors are happy with plea deals. If the plea deal fits the crime, then the statutes themselves are waaaay fucked up.
the sad part as a society is far too many do not want to acknowledge we have far too many people not fit to live in a free society.
the other truth is our prisons are so lax, from cell phone availability to drugs to gang activity that some going in don't see the down side.
to reduce the revolving door we first need to take back our prisons from the prisoners and then use it to reform those we can having them prove through education and skills they can be part of society and for the rest just learn to accommodate them for life if need be
If the laws were just then I would agree with you. But they're not.
No body can complain now, because it would be sexist.
"the local BOP employee union" HERE's the problem.
""upper management at the prison covers up reports of misconduct by supervisors, retaliates against staff who file complaints and violates federal law by not honoring contract negotiations."
Yet every act mentioned in the article was committed by a UNION employee.
Could just redefine corruption.
Look at all of the propaganda reason is spouting. Don't they know that goverment run prisons are perfect and good, because they don't have to worry about icky profits. It's only the private for profit prisons that are corrupt
"From sexual violence and medical neglect to understaffing and years-long lockdowns, the BOP's leadership has allowed a humanitarian crisis to develop on its watch,"
Yeah, how dare they have years-long lockdowns. How can anyone stand for that?
Sexual violence! Someone should be in prison over this!
Better distribute condoms to the female prisoners with penises
First thing they need to do is re-sort all the Ladydicks into women’s prisons. That should fix things
"They laughed at her. They said she was faking. They told us she was too young to be having a heart attack."
Can we talk about how this is a "boy who cried wolf" situation, as well? This is a problem we see a lot in criminal justice, in that cops and COs are surrounded by people who lie to them. People fake and malinger all the time, for all sorts of benefits. Suspects yell "I can't breathe" all the time as well. When you're used to hearing something as a lie, it makes it hard to discern when you're hearing the truth, especially if liars can be really adamant about their truthfulness.
I don't really know what the solution is. If we started treated every faker/malingerer like they were being serious, it's actually rewarding that behavior. And we have such a demand for Corrections Officers that we can't raise the qualifications too high and artificially squeeze the supply, that's not helping the situation either.
Obviously we need to reduce the prison population, but not at the expense of letting the violent perpetrators off.
Awesome post. I am a normal visitor of your blog and appreciate you taking the time to maintain the excellent site. I’ll be a frequent visitor for a long time. golf usa
This article assumes facts not in evidence: that a Biden appointee would want to fight corruption rather than getting her cut.