A California Law Regulating Ride-Share Apps Leaves Truckers in Limbo
The state's trucking industry fears drivers will quit or work out of state.

A California law intended to help gig workers is now leaving truckers in the lurch.
In 2019, the Golden State passed A.B. 5, which went into effect the following year. The bill significantly narrowed the circumstances under which a business could refer to someone as an "independent contractor," codifying a three-part "ABC test" established under the California Supreme Court 2018 decision Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County. As Reason's Billy Binion summarized it at the time, "To prove that their workers are contractors and not employees, companies must show that those workers control their workload, perform work that falls outside of the business's normal scope, and are 'customarily engaged' in the occupation or business." Unless a company can demonstrate those three factors, it must classify those workers as employees, entitled to any rights and privileges thereof.
The bill explicitly targeted "gig economy" companies like Uber and Postmates, which sued trying to block implementation, as well as Lyft, DoorDash, and similar competitors. But the law also applied to a host of other industries that rely on contract or freelance workers, from churches to nail salons.
In early 2020, the California Trucking Association (CTA) won an injunction against the state to prevent the law from being enforced against the trucking sector. But in June, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case regarding a lower court's reversal of the injunction, effectively upholding A.B. 5.
Now, drivers who own and operate their own trucks are left in limbo, with little guidance on how the law applies to them. The uncertainty could have devastating effects on an already-strained supply chain.
According to the CTA, more than 70 percent of the truckers that service the largest U.S. ports are owner-operators rather than employees of a trucking firm. Owner-operators tend to contract their services to companies while maintaining their independence. Plenty of people simply don't want to be somebody else's employee, and starting one's own company as a sole proprietor can cost tens of thousands of dollars.
Speaking to Bloomberg, truckers and trucking company owners alike expressed trepidation over how the law will affect their industry. One trucking firm executive, Kevin McMaster, worried that many drivers would simply retire or work out of state if forced to become employees of a trucking firm. Bloomberg estimates that as many as 70,000 truck drivers in California could be stuck trying to navigate the new law.
Eric Sauer, CTA's senior vice president for government affairs, worried that the law's implementation "couldn't have come at a worse time" amid peak seasons in the construction and agriculture seasons, as well as for "holiday imports coming into the ports."
Supply chain issues are not new by this point, nor are challenges facing the trucking industry. Unfortunately, laws like A.B. 5, intended to apply specifically to ride-share and food delivery services, threaten to make issues worse while devastating an industry in the process.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The state's trucking industry fears drivers will quit or work out of state.
Like so much women inconvenienced by post first-trimester abortion bans.
California... "Team D" land, where Government Almighty, at the behest of the self-righteous "D" voters, INSISTS on being "compassionate" (with other people's money), thereby HURTING the poor and workers! (Think min-wage laws, rent-control laws, etc.).
Meanwhile... "Team R" land, where Government Almighty, at the behest of the self-righteous "R" voters, INSISTS on being "compassionate" (with other people's wombs), thereby HURTING the "binders full of women" would will now have statist womb-control laws enslaving them to "Lying Lotharios"! http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/#_Toc107315509
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/02/health/abortion-myths-mental-health-wellness/index.html
Myths about abortion and women's mental health are widespread, experts say
from above…
Women denied an abortion who carried their babies to term were "much more likely to experience physical health issues at the time of childbirth, as childbirth is much more risky than having an abortion," Biggs said. Two of the women in the study died during childbirth.
A 2012 study found the risk of death associated with childbirth is approximately 14 times higher than the risk from abortion.
After five years, the study found women denied an abortion were more likely to "live in poverty and much more likely to suffer economic hardship, including more bankruptcies, debt and challenges meeting basic living needs," Biggs said.
Women who were turned away were also more likely to be tethered to a violent and abusive partner, and to have chronic health conditions, Biggs said. "They also lowered their aspirations (for the future), and they were less likely to achieve them," she added.
There are like, 100 different articles talking about Abortion on Reason. Why are you bringing it up in an article about truckers in California?
Have you the mental capacity to read the post that I responded to?
If not... It is pretty "Super Scary" that anyone should trust you with a keyboard, and think that your comments are worth reading!
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (bet-05) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
SQRLSY should be euthanized. I favor strapping him down and giving him sulfuric acid IV drips to all of his limbs.
teh purpose of the law was to force all truckers to unions. no that wasn't stated in the law but they new it would have that affect
which is THE reason that lw was drafted in the first place. Look who CONTROLS the ports in California> ANd what they re doing to slow to a glacial crawl all activity within them. Throwing out 70% of the availble truck tractors with this law was another intended consequence. Their stupid pollution control law also helped to can an YUUUGE percentage of California owner'operators. 65% of the truck tractors on the road in that state this time last year were owneroperated, and/or prior to 2011 build. Two laws took both classes of tractors out.
Carefully planned.
think about the "cui bono" aspect of the present situation. Too bad the California goombah on the street can't see thorugh the smoke and mirrors to understand what their gunnit are DOING to them. A four letter word ending in the letter "e" comes to mind.
The core solution is to get rid of the democrats.
Intended consequence.
California governments do not want anyone associated with the word "independent" anywhere in their state.
Get out and stay out.
all according to plan.
There is no problem so bad that government can't make it worse.
And, as in so many areas, California leads the world.
The state's trucking industry fears drivers will quit or work out of state.
THEY SHOULD. It's time for California to stop being insulated from the fallout of their shitty policies.
That's the problem.
The asshole bay area proggies in Sacramento ARE insulated from the fallout. The rest of is are not. We suffer, they keep their jobs because the bay area has outsized influence and has for years.
Jerry Brown was a piece of shit, but at least he'd tell the legislature to pound sand on the worst of their purely ideological shite. Newsome is full on San Francisco and will sign any progressive bill that crosses his desk, regardless of how it affects the 39 million Californians not in SF. But they'll all stay because LA would vote for the Devil if he was a Democrat, and the bay area actually loves being progressive/trendy.
As is everyone else in the country. How many trucks don't pull out of the ports of Long Beach or LA because the drivers won't work in Cali? Part the LA's "shipping logistics problems" is getting things out even while they have trouble getting ships in and unloaded. Meanwhile the trains are stripped by gangs as they're slowly moved out through Cali congestion. We all pay.
Will the last private business left in California please turn out the lights? Oh, no need, the electricity is out again already.
Good and hard.
I hope all of the truckers start to refuse delivering food to California. I say this as a resident of this trash state. It would be halarious to watch all of the proggies starve to death. As I told my wife "I will be fine. I have a gun and we have squirrels"
I for one want to see this interpreted as broadly as possible so the damage is too pervasive to ignore. Would be funny to have the ports shut down because the traffic had been diverted and the shelves go Soviet because the remaining fleets were too small to cover California.
well, rail takes a lot of it into the state, but the trucks then must take it to where folks can buy it.
Perhaps its time for the owner/operators to convoy together, haul the freight anyway. How many CHP will it take to impound 70,000 truck tractors? And how will the bulls know whether the guy behind the wheel up front is a fleet emplloyee or an O/O? Of, for that matter, the year of build for his tractor, unless its really old. Hah, back when I drove, my tractor was twenty years old, and I sae many a lot older than that/
Starbucks, in a move to satisfy equity concerns, opened its bathrooms to the general public.
Starbucks, in a reaction to the results of its equity campaign is closing 16 stores in Seattle, LA, Portland and Philadelphia.
According to the CTA, more than 70 percent of the truckers that service the largest U.S. ports are owner-operators rather than employees of a trucking firm.
Sideline the trucks in a very public way, or refuse to take any jobs with a delivery point inside the state. Choke the state until they change the law.
TMITE headline: Racist Truckers Boycott California, Birthing People and Minorities Hardest Hit
teh truckers should block all ports of entry but Americans no longer have the balls to do that like unlike the brave farmers in the Netherlands and other countries now joining them. the last truck protest got chased out of town with water balloons.
They don't need to block. Just don't accept jobs. The ports require an unbelievable amount of trucking, just to get to warehouses and trains for a bunch of it. 70% of the trucks go away and you'll see a line of ships at anchor waiting their turn to offload again.
They do now. Granted a bit further out to sea than they did so the people don't wonder why there are so many ships blocking their beach sunset.
California doesn't want all those diesel-spewing trucks polluting their air so this is a win-win for the state. People can just have their needed products delivered magically from Amazon. I'm sure Amazon uses EV trucks or drones that run on electricity which is produced by unicorn droppings and fairy dust.
Close, they use narwhal blood
Is it possible to reference Narwhals without thinking about weebl and bob ?
https://youtu.be/ykwqXuMPsoc
Nope. Watch for them on the highways.Amazon use the same independent owner operator drivers the ports have used. Hiring large fleets is more costly and WhammyZon ia all about that bottom line. If they could get a package to someone for a nickel less, they would. So if all the O/O drivers or trip lease guyswere to park their rigs in other states instead of just being forced off the roads in California, not even the zon could deliver your groceries.
*ring* *ring*
Hello?
Hello Texas, This is California. Just wanted to give you a heads up on another wave of economic refugees we're sending your way.
Oh. Okay. Do they have any skills?
Transportation.
Niiiiiiiice.
How can owner-operators not satisfy the 3-part test? And even if they don't, they can incorporate and then their customers are no longer dealing with a possibly-employee but with an independent firm.
"A California law intended to help gig workers"
That may be what it said on the label, but as I recall the law was backed by the taxicab owners and unions to shut out Uber and Lyft because they had a better business model. The California Legislature wrote the law too broadly, and included a whole bunch of gig workers who need to work independently. Like most of the people who work in the movie industry, and virtually all freelance writers. And, of course, independent truckers.
The Legislature could have amended or rescinded the law, but the true purpose would have then been evident.
Yes. Uber and Lyft specifically offered to raise wages to $21/hr but CA wasn't interested.
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/uber-lyft-propose-21-hour-minimum-wage-drivers-california-n1047731
"The new pay structure would ensure drivers make $21 an hour, but only when they have a rider in their car or are on their way to pick up a passenger."
LOL when else are they actually working for Uber/Lfyt?
And freelance journalists and photographers.
I’m guessing Pete Buttigeig should move to California. How does this law pass constitutional muster? It affects interstate trade.
“When a city has grown so overlarge and crowded that it is in immediate danger of collapse . . . when food and clean water flow into the city at a rate just sufficient to feed every mouth, and every hand must work constantly to keep it that way . . . when all transportation is involved in moving vital supplies, and none is left over to move people out of the city should the need arise . . . then it is that Crazy Eddie leads the movers of garbage out on strike for better working conditions.”
There was considerable laughter in the wardroom. Renner’s image grinned and said, “I think I know the gentleman. …”
“And mine spoke of Crazy Eddie as an engineer always using tomorrow’s capital to fix today’s problems,” Sinclair blurted.
Jock Sinclair's Motie spoke of melting down your supply of screws to make a screwdriver.
No supply chain issues for people like the Governor who probably send one of their security detail down to the docks in a gas guzzler SUV to pick up an anniversary gift for his wife.
Already, at least some cargo is put onto trains bound for distribution centers close to where it is needed. It might be possible to increase the rail part of multimodal shipments, which might also have the green-approved result of less pollution from long-distance trucking. Of course, delivery might be a little slower and trucking-related employment might be reduced a bit. Californians might still have delivery problems within the state but maybe they coerce the unemployed homeless into using wheelbarrows and little red wagons to make deliveries.