New Japanese Law Makes 'Online Insults' a Jailable Offense
Dedication to free speech is in short supply around the world, with Britain and Canada previously considering similar bills.

This week, a Japanese law went into effect making it a jailable offense to be a jerk on the Internet.
As reported by The Japan Times, the legislation, passed in June, strengthens the country's punishment for "online insults." According to CNN, "Under Japan's penal code, insults are defined as publicly demeaning someone's social standing without referring to specific facts about them or a specific action…The crime is different to defamation, defined as publicly demeaning someone while pointing to specific facts."
Previously, the penalty for online offensiveness was either a fine of less than ¥10,000 (about $73 USD) or fewer than 30 days in prison. Under the new law, which went into effect Thursday, the penalties increased to as much as a year in prison and a fine of up to ¥300,000 (about $2,200 USD). It also extended the statute of limitations from one year to three.
A push for the law came in 2020, when Japanese wrestler and reality TV star Hana Kimura committed suicide after allegedly receiving abusive messages on social media. The bill briefly stalled over concerns that it would stifle legitimate criticism of politicians. Finally, the legislature reached a compromise, inserting a provision requiring that "a review will be conducted within three years…to determine if it unfairly restricts free speech," per The Japan Times.
Why wait?
Any criminalization of "offensive" speech is inherently subject to abuse. After all, whoever is in power at a given time will get to decide what's offensive.
Japan's new law is quite broad. It doesn't define what is or is not "demeaning," and since there's no requirement that the statements be statements of fact, it could mean anything. CNN quotes Seiho Cho, a lawyer in Japan, who says that the law lacks "a guideline that makes a distinction on what qualifies as an insult….If someone calls the leader of Japan an idiot, then maybe under the revised law that could be classed as an insult."
Indeed, this is one of the hallmarks of the First Amendment: the right to criticize those in power, even crudely or crassly, without (legal) retribution. As an epithet against President Joe Biden, "let's go, Brandon" may be juvenile, and some may consider it hateful, but it is unquestionably protected speech.
Japan enjoys one of the most free and open societies, with the nonprofit Freedom House rating it 96 out of 100 points in its global freedom ranking, including 15 out of 16 in the Freedom of Expression and Belief category. Such an overt criminalization of unpopular speech represents a worrying trend in the wrong direction.
Around the world, dedication to free speech is in short supply. Last year, Canada and Great Britain considered laws that would ban online rhetoric perceived as hateful or harmful. Even in the U.S., there is a trend lately among younger generations to equate speech with violence.
Speech is not violence, and attempts to regulate it as if it were will only empower the regulators at the expense of the powerless.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
All of these concerns over online abuse could be solved by requiring the use of true identities, combined with the resumption of dueling.
Plus the reduction in population would benefit global climate warming change.
Win - win.
…says the man hiding behind a nom de plume.
Just trying to fit in to what the site culture was when I started posting.
And I am too lazy to change it now.
But if you will be on the village green at dawn tomorrow, we can discuss it further.
Says the man too lazy to type in his real name and location of his fictional village green.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (wbr-03) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
or.... snowflakes could just learn to live with the fact sometimes people are rude online?
But...but...rude words are violence and make sensitive people feel scared, and the purpose of government is personal protection and supporting ideological bubbles!
Start now incomes each week extra than $7,000 to 8,000 through doing quite simple and smooth domestic primarily based totally task on-line. Last month I've made $32,735 through doing this on-line task simply in my component time for handiest 2 hrs. an afternoon the usage of my laptop. This task is simply wonderful and smooth to do in component time. Start incomes extra greenbacks on-line simply through follow:-
.
commands here:☛☛☛ https://yourjobs85.blogspot.com/
That was the whole point of sites requiring Facebook logins to post comments, before most sites just decided to ditch comments altogether. Makes it easier for the CIA and FBI to update your dossier.
Japan enjoys one of the most free and open societies, with the nonprofit Freedom House rating it 96 out of 100 points in its global freedom ranking,
But they apparently already had a law that issued fines for being rude online, in addition to whatever defamation laws they have on the books, according to this article. Doesn’t that kind of make you question how well Japan was being evaluated, if there’s such restrictions on free speech?
A bit more detail - - -
https://freedomhouse.org/country/japan/freedom-world/2022
They get 4/4 on:
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution?
Explanatory text:
The government generally does not restrict personal expression or private discussion. Some observers have raised concerns that antiterrorism and anticonspiracy legislation that went into effect in 2017 could permit undue surveillance.
But can you still buy used girl's panties in vending machines? Asking for some Reason commenters.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (sby-32) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
Let's give the government more power--and directives--to treat society like a preschool, with official institutional kindness and fairness as top priorities. Now which segments of our population want this?
Repeal the 19th!
Absolutely. Men should have the power to tell women what to do, just as God and George Washington intended.
"Men should have the power to tell women what to do, just as God and George Washington intended."
Are you still allowed to say that Jeff? Are you a biologist? What if women with penises are telling men with vaginas what to do? Is that okay?
Women don't have penises.
Men don't have vaginas.
The earth is not flat.
Science.
Which era had more libertarian government?
"Oppressing women is justified if it means we get lower taxes."
Nice try. Now do "compassionate" management of society to achieve niceness, conformity, and safety.
That IS what you are saying, that the ends justify the means. That it's okay to treat women as second-class citizens if it means we don't have "compassionate management of society". And of course it is all based on gross stereotyping of women (and men!).
We all know that blacks are just violent thugs, so they shouldn't vote.
We all know that gays are perverts who want to have sex with kids, so they shouldn't vote either.
We all know that Hispanics are all just lazy welfare moochers so they shouldn't vote either.
And of course women shouldn't vote because they are all delicate flowers who will vote for Daddy Government to protect them.
Sound good to you?
Fewer people voting = fewer people feeding on the state's trough.
Actually yeah, that sounds good to me.
I guess you really don't believe in Science!, at least the decades of social and cognitive science that documents and quantifies significant differences in how men vs women think about socialization, risk, aggression, etc., and how those indeed carry over into law.
Oppressing women is justified
Even penis endowed women?
I see your problem. Libertarian does not just equal “low taxes”.
Twasn't men who wanted the 18th.
It seems like just yesterday Jeffy was complaining about commenters who misstate opposing positions in stupid and self-serving ways. At least no one misunderstood this as a principle he would apply even to himself when he wrote it.
I'd be happy if only taxpayers were allowed to vote. You shouldn't have a say in how the money is spent unless you pay in more than you get out.
Agreed.
If the state is going to have the power to decide who can fight and die on its behalf, then all those subject to that authority should have a say in that government.
Look at how the Civil War draft worked. Of course in those times only white male property owners could vote. So of course they instituted a draft system in which rich men could buy their way out of being conscripted. Very convenient for them.
One vote for each net 10K in taxes you pay. Flat tax of 10K per person. Pay more if you want more votes, or think the government needs to spend more than 2 trillion a year (200 adults x 10K each.)
No need to be approximate like that; computers make it feasible to proxy exact taxes paid.
My libertopia's legislature's main chamber members proxy all the votes they received in the last election, with the top three being elected. All remaining votes go to a volunteer, selected randomly from all voters who drop their name in volunteer voting box. Even in colonial times, this would not have been a major problem. It only takes a few minutes to add them up, and you'd want three independent tallies to catch mistakes or fraud. It eliminates the rationale for the census, and it encourages people to vote, which all politicians claim they want.
One thing I like about the volunteer idea is that you can drop anyone's name in the box; worst that happens is they decline if chosen and you pick someone else. I also like that it means 25% of all members are complete newcomers and outliers each session, bound to shake up the old guard of established career politicians. Makes it a lot harder to predict the outcome of any bill, or to plan on how trading votes will affect passage.
I'd be fine with a third chamber, the "tax" chamber, whose members proxy all the taxes assigned to them on tax returns.
I'd also like a "property" chamber, whose members proxy all the acreage assigned to them on property tax bills. This would be a bit hazy definition since property taxes are state and local only, and you certainly can't let government property ownership provide any votes. But on the other hand, maybe state governments should have a say in the federal property chamber, and cities and counties should have a say in state property chambers.
In reality, extra chambers only provide more chances to prevent passage of bills, and that is more important than the type of chamber. Hell, give the wokies a chamber too, although I don't know what metric they'd be based.
I'd be happy with just two chambers, with only one body granted the power to tax and fund. And members of that body would be elected in some way biased by taxpayer "contributions".
The other body can be elected by popular vote, and then can pass all kinds of feel-good resolutions but without funding to back them up.
Reason comment section hardest hit
If this law passed here in the U.S., we'd have to build a lot more jails.
Build back better.
Enough to house a hundred million people at least.
It’d be easier to just make them stay home…
You can go fuck yourself with a tent pole.
Come at me, Japan!
So it would create jobs and fight inflation!
Insular society passes law that keeps them insular.
Whatever.
Yeah, but we in the US are the most racist people on the planet.
Japan is one of the freest countries on the planet, don’t you know? That’s why they need laws to make people go to prison for rudeness.
What I really like is that how they magically changed from feudal-imperial to sharing and caring. But still 100% racist.
Nuclear persuasion.
https://twitter.com/TJLakers01/status/1545760191160848384?t=u9SbfWTMoHWNN0RB7gD2gw&s=19
This is how crazy it's getting-Bidens FBI showed up at a North Dakota women's house for posting a paragraph of the Declaration of Independence on Facebook....
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Sounds insurrectiony to me.
It is.
I call it the most eloquently penned riot proclamation in history.
Showed up how? With a search warrant and a goon squad? Or just a couple agents asking questions? Really curious.
Pro Tip - if any law enforcement show up at your door and ask you about your online activity, take a picture of them with your phone, ask their names and tell them: fuck off slaver.
https://twitter.com/now____or_never/status/1544798653352738821?t=ya8LwMik6sah1D0TzxlDgA&s=19
URGENT - SHARE WIDELY: today we announced that we will risk arrest at the Congressional Baseball Game. But we need more people to succeed in shutting it down.
Please. Tell everyone you know. This is important. This could be our last chance in a generation to pass a climate bill.
lol what a bunch of tools.
Interrupting the Congressional baseball game is the best you got? You've lost. No one cares about your stupid climate shit anymore.
https://twitter.com/thebradfordfile/status/1545561972464295936?t=6WHFsMJNXYdFV712olJ_kQ&s=19
On the same day Shinzo Abe was assassinated, the white house is full on encouraging the terrorizing of conservative justices.
Incredible.
all part of the plan...
Again, the left is no longer even trying to hide totalitarian urges.
Around the world, dedication to free speech is in short supply. Last year, Canada and Great Britain considered laws that would ban online rhetoric perceived as hateful or harmful. Even in the U.S., there is a trend lately among younger generations to equate speech with violence.
I know this is probably too local, but Canada is currently moving bill C10 through its parliament.
I am still not sure if young leftists really are snowflakes who demand an ideologically pure existence out of true fear, or are vicious ideologues pretending to be afraid of mean words.
On both counts, Yes.
No widespread fraud.
Hana Kimura should be ashamed for falling into the suteretipu of a depressed Jap who offed themselves.
https://twitter.com/decunningham2/status/1545379868543696897?t=QshDzt2-Q1vWa-UJHcy7yw&s=19
Spot the difference
[Headlines]
Here, I'll save you from having to click the link.
3 Associated Press headlines:
-"Fidel Castro, who denied the US for 50 years, dies at 90 in Cuba"
-"Hugo Chavez, fiery Venezuelan leader, dies at 58"
-"Shinzo Abe, powerful former Japan PM, leaves divided legacy"
*defied, not denied, in the Casteo headline
Abe was assassinated, so at least one person didn’t approve, hence ‘divided’ legacy.
Obv
They banned guns there, too. And yet someone chose to break that law.
MSNBC had better close their Tokyo bureau and flee the country
On the day of the assassination of a Japanese Prime Minister Peacock launched a Boris bashing campaign headlined:
"UK shows US how to dump a lying toxic politician"
Ladies and gentlemen, here is our Declaration: ( from Bari Weiss)
https://www.commonsense.news/p/the-new-founders-america-needs
“ What has become obvious to anyone paying attention is that we are living through a kind of revolution.
It is not a physical one. As my friend Abe Greenwald wrote in Commentary Magazine, it “is not being fought within the physical limits of a battlefield. It is instead happening all around us and directly to us. It is redefining our culture, our media, and giving new shape to our public and private institutions. It is remaking the nation before our eyes.”
In other words, this is a revolution of culture. A revolution of ideas.”
Join the “coalition of the same.”
Wise and inspiring words! And as with the original Declaration, the couple of bits of God-talk didn't distract from the overall universal message to break from shopworn, oppressors and to seek and uphold truth against all who would shut you down!
As for The University of Austin, it would be great if, in addition to upholding Classical Liberal free inquiry, they perhaps teamed up with providers of STEAM-related degrees and vocational training. That way, the cancelled never have to be down and out financially.
TEST CASE TIME
Suppose your name is Richard Wolf (not Rudy) Hess, and you get something like this from an opponent in acrimonious abortion-related litigation:
--- rant start
I stand by what I said I'm going to do and I've already started the research on you to see what you really are, including as far as if you should be on Moss Ad's or Shin Bath lists due to any past family connections to people who get on those lists, and the rest of your sordid history.
I'm Jewish by Blood and you wronged me. You brag about a faschist law SB8 and about controlling women's wombs.
Therefore I am not operating out of the blue when I'm going to research to see if you have any connections to the Nasi party or any other such faschistas.
Stay tuned on that, Wolf.
-- rant end
QUESTION PRESENTED: What is to be done in response?
Shouldn't I have some sort of recourse in this factual scenario, though not necessarily through the criminal justice system? At least when this sort of trash talk is distributed to professional colleagues?
Statutory damages of $1,000 for each email recipient to whom I was denounced as a Nazi? Or is it all great because someone is taking the First Amendment to the hilt? Or privileged because we are skirmishing in a court of law where everything goes and everything said is clad with immunity?
"QUESTION PRESENTED: What is to be done in response?"
Answer: Ignore it, assuming you have a gun. Or get a gun; you are now allowed to do so. Suggest 20G shotgun; pretty deadly, close range (like in a house) with little peripheral damage; the miscreant dies, you patch a couple of holes in the drywall.
Seems MacArthur was as conflicted a human as you could find, but in his role' as colonial ruler (according to the books on the shelves) he did as good as could be hoped for.
But that was 75 years ago; the Japanese should by now have accepted the role' of adults.
And seemingly haven't; there's opposition to Japan's 're-armament' for fear it might engage Japan in a war! Much better to rely on the US taxpayers to engage the US in that war to keep Japan free!
The one mistake Mac made (and it really is hindsight) was allowing the Japanese to celebrate 8/9 as "victims", rather than as a "thanksgiving" for saving all the Japanese lives which, by all estimates (even Japanese), amounted to millions, at the cost of ~150,000 lives.
If the allies had invaded, there would not be a Japanese culture in Japan now, period.
Dunno what would be there (CA immigrants?) but it would not be Japanese.
Once again, the japs have opened themselves up for a bombing campaign to which they have been rendered defenseless. We can open google translate in one window, and any jap forum in another, a shit fury down their necks unabashedly, while they sit and have no option other than to agree with our name calling. I’ll start!
https://www.peace-nagasaki.go.jp/en/hosting-exhibition
Konichiwa japs. Oh I remember him! He cry like bitch! USA undefeated!