A New Jersey Town Wants To Charge This Woman $5,000 To Sell Cookies
Somerville still has costly regulations on the books even though New Jersey has legalized the sale of home-baked items.

Maria Winter thought she could supplement her son's college fund by selling homemade cookies. She has a talent for baking and knows her products are well-received, having made and decorated cookies for students at the elementary school where she teaches.
But when it came time for Winter to fulfill the application requirements and pay the fees associated with launching a home-baked goods business in Somerville, New Jersey, she quickly learned how byzantine the licensing process can be for home bakers.
Somerville officials denied her application for a home business zoning permit, telling her that she needed to secure a zoning variance. According to MyCentralJersey.com, which first reported on Winter's story, the borough said she had to pay a $1,000 application fee and put $4,000 into a borough escrow account. It also required that she publish a public notice in the local newspaper and notify all neighbors within 200 feet of her property that her application would undergo a public hearing. "Going through a public hearing is a lengthy, expensive process," says Rob Peccola, an attorney for the Institute for Justice (IJ).
What makes Winter's roadblocks especially mind-boggling is the fact that state requirements for home bakers are so comparatively lenient. The state-issued permit for home bakers—also called cottage food operators—costs $100 and is valid for two years, allowing bakers to sell goods up to an annual gross income of $50,000. "Somerville's requirements are out of step with New Jersey state law and serve no rational purpose," said Peccola in a press release. "They simply keep people like Maria from earning an honest living doing something that is common and legal across the state."
"It's very confusing to me that the state is saying I can do something but my town is saying I can't and can't even give me a reason why," Winter told MyCentralJersey.com. "I'm trying to be an upstanding citizen and nothing is happening. I'm just frustrated."
Until last October, New Jersey was the only state in the country that banned home bakers from selling their goods. Bakers risked fines of up to $1,000 for unlicensed sales. New Jersey's current licensing scheme isn't liberal by any means: Eligible products are limited to a list of 18 food categories (the baker must submit an application to sell anything that falls outside those options), producers can't sell their products at grocery stores, and most states have higher caps on yearly sales. Still, well over 500 cottage food operators have secured permits in New Jersey since the ban was lifted, a sign of the once-stifled entrepreneurial spirit that can now flourish in much of the state.
Somerville may yet catch up to statewide standards. Peccola has sent a letter to Somerville officials urging them to reform licensing policies so that home businesses can flourish. He noted that Somerville's policies make it "almost impossible" to apply for a home baking license, and worse, "would likely be unconstitutional under the state and federal constitution." Somerville Borough Administrator Kevin Sluka has reportedly recommended that the borough planning board review the draconian ordinance that creates a contradiction between Somerville's zoning policies and New Jersey's home baking law.
States have made great strides in recent years to liberalize their cottage food laws, with Oklahoma, Alabama, and Montana among those making it easier for home producers to make a living. Whether Somerville will hang up its half-baked regulatory scheme remains to be seen.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
She should sell abortions and hand out free cookies for each purchase.
sex ibk is great web place created for your own sexy contacts in EU
Outside of Chicago, New Jersey is most openly run as a criminal enterprise. Why would you think any laws should take the public benefit into consideration? If this lady wants to sell cookies, it's going to cost her.
follow Dead & Company around and sell cookies @Shakedown
Or a kneecap; or one case of arson. Regardless, vig is ten points a week and we hold your kids as collateral.
as your business partners we are entitled to a portion of your profits, namely one hundred percent.
This kind of deregulatory stuff is so important. It's a great constraint on so much of our population and I'm glad to see us moving in a better direction.
These kind of regs came in when some Karen complained about a neighbor opening a business in her home and there was a constant stream of customers and delivery vans clogging the quiet streets. (Sort of like Prime, FedEx, UPS vans do today.)
Once on the books, there was no room for a case by case review of what the business was and whether or not it would be a nuisance.
Slowly the tide is turning - many local municipalities are now revising their "keeping chickens is prohibited" policies.
And lobbying pressure from Big Cookie, of course.
But mostly from Progressives worried that the cookies might not be safe for human consumption if they get an occasional cat hair in them, unlike factory made cookies which meet strict federal standards for rat hair and cricket parts (even though those standard are also non-zero, thanks to lobbying from Big Cookie).
Hey, I like home baked cookies as much as, if not more than, the next guy, but the Constitution is not a suicide pact.
And "keeping chickens in your backyard" is no longer prohibited in some places because Progressives think it's hip.
But no roosters. Chicken sexists.
Got to make up for lost tax revenue from people moving out of state.
So all she has to do is charge $200.00 per cookie.
Blame Trump or Putin, either one works.
"It's very confusing to me that the state is saying I can do something but my town is saying I can't and can't even give me a reason why,"
FYTW
Maybe she isn't that bright, e.g. the Federal Constitution says it's ok to have partial birth abortions, but the local State government also has to approve, i.e. issues close to home should be determined by the people who are close to home. The State says it's ok to have sex ed books, but the local school board has to approve etc. based on local conditions. Just think if Hitler and the State wanted one thing but the local residents got to decide if they wanted it or not.
Gonna need to see a pic of her cookie before I know what I’d pay for it.
Prestige City Sarjapur residentials are among the best options for investments and end.
Since I live in the People's Republic of NJ, this is no surprise at all. Somerville is quite close to Princeton, and the Governor's mansion. Onerous, business-killing regulation is that area's bread and butter.
Phil Murphy managed to kill 33% of all small businesses in NJ with his idiotic Covid edicts. Not to mention the thousands of nursing home patients that died on his watch.
I think their cookie rule is like the vape rule. She can sell them only if they have no flavoring.
Thats why whenever you can buy no permits or licenses. Do it all on the sly as trying to go legit just opens up a can of worms. My other suggestions are move from that communist state and fuck New Jerksky!