A Wonky Evisceration of Biden's Bad Deficit Math
Interest rates and servicing costs could push us into worrisome territory sooner than we think.

President Joe Biden is taking victory laps for last year's reduced budget deficit. No one would be happier than me to see this number fall in a significant way. But the decline has nothing to do with the president's policies, and it changes little about the dangers of our fiscal situation.
According to monthly reporting by the Treasury Department, we know the budget deficit for May was $66 billion. So far, the deficit for the 2022 fiscal year is $426 billion. With four months left, this year's deficit will indeed be significantly lower than last year's, which was nearly $2.8 trillion. There's nothing like $5 trillion in COVID-19-relief spending paid for with borrowed cash to balloon a deficit!
Biden's administration did nothing to bring about the deficit's decline. Credit really goes to large increases in tax revenues as the economy rebounded combined with the decision by Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (D–Ariz.) and Joe Manchin (D–W.Va.) and their Republican colleagues to block Biden's expensive "Build Back Better" proposal. BBB would have made permanent many of the emergency programs created or expanded during the pandemic, and had it passed, government spending and deficits would be heading even higher than they are today.
That said, the still-too-close-to-$1 trillion deficit for FY 2022 is inexcusably large. More worrisome is the cost that we taxpayers must shoulder because of the pre- and post-COVID-19 deficits. According to that same Treasury report, in May, the U.S. government paid $56 billion in interest payments on its debt, up from $44 billion in April. As of now, total interest payments for this year are $311 billion. With four months still to go on this figure, we can assume a total interest cost for FY 2022 of at least $500 billion.
This is just the beginning. Before the pandemic and the inflation unleashed by irresponsible government spending and easy money, the Congressional Budget Office projected that in 2050, interest payments on U.S. debt would consume 8 percent of GDP and 40 percent of government revenue. These projections assumed modest increases in interest rates over a long-term period. However, as of today, the short-term figures look optimistic as inflation and the Federal Reserve's response to it are boosting interest rates.
Higher interest rates today will raise interest payments shortly thereafter, as so much of our debt is short term. According to the Treasury, total interest on marketable debt in May was 1.73 percent, up from 1.66 percent in April and rising. At this pace, we could reach 2 percent by the end of the year. A calculation by the Mercatus Center's Jack Salmon finds that a 1 percent increase in interest rates would result in annual interest payments of $1.06 trillion while a 2 percent increase would elevate these annual payments to $1.45 trillion.
It's expensive for sure, but it is also a vicious cycle if the interest is paid for with yet more borrowing. More borrowing raises total interest payments. In addition, if one believes (as I do) that most of our current inflation is rooted in recent fiscal irresponsibility, then more borrowing to pay for more interest will only add more fuel to the inflation fire.
Finally, as the average interest rate on marketable debt approaches 2 percent, we are getting close to the threshold that some left-leaning economists say should trigger concerns about the size of government debt.
In 2020, economists Jason Furman and Lawrence Summers weren't worried about this. Interest rates were historically low and seemed destined to stay low. Still, out of academic rigor, they laid out some markers for when we might start worrying about the debt: "As a new guidepost, we propose that fiscal policy focus on supporting economic growth while preventing real debt service from being projected to rise quickly or to rise above 2 percent of GDP over the forthcoming decade."
Today, debt held by the public is about 98 percent of GDP, so with a 1.734 percent interest rate, we are currently spending 1.7 percent of GDP on interest payments. If the Federal Reserve does have to raise rates significantly higher than projected to tame inflation, we really should start to worry.
In other words, the budget deficit might be smaller than at the height of the pandemic, and that is a good and predictable thing. But it's no cause for celebration as interest rates and servicing costs could push us into worrisome territory sooner than we think.
COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden,
The enemy within
I even have made $30,030 just in five weeks straightforwardly working part-time from my apartment. (fhg-03) Immediately when I've lost my last business, I was exhausted and luckily I found this top online task & with this I am in a position to obtain thousands directly through my home. Everybody is able to get this best career &
can gain more dollars online going this article.......... http://payout11.tk
The DEBT is not the DEFICIT. And the DEFICIT is not the DEBT. They are separate problems.
Government BORROWING drives up the debt, not government SPENDING.
The solution to our debt problem is simple: STOP ISSUING DEBT-BASED MONEY! Begin issuing pure “unbacked” fiat money to fund the deficit, rather than going further into debt. The inflationary impact of unbacked dollars is no worse than the inflationary impact of the same amount of debt-backed dollars. Issuing unbacked dollars will halt the increase in the national debt and its crushing $500+ billion in annual interest. Paying off part of the maturing debt each year and rolling over the rest will eventually bring the national debt (and its taxpayer-financed interest payments) down to zero. See http://www.fixourmoney.com .
"...Begin issuing pure “unbacked” fiat money to fund the deficit..."
Fuck off and die.
Worked so well on Zimbabwe and Weimer Germany.
See http://www.fixourmoney.com :
The German (1921-23) and Hungarian (1945-46) hyperinflations were the products of special circumstances and were not triggered by a political desire to spend recklessly. Each country was on the losing side of a world war and found itself weighed down by a huge and unpayable war debt imposed by the victors (the Soviet Union, in the case of Hungary). Reparations had to be delivered in the form of gold, goods and hard currency. In an attempt to pay off these debts, each country printed massive amounts of its official currency to purchase the assets required to pay these reparations. Neither country had any alternative. This practice directly triggered both ruinous hyperinflations.
The more recent bout of unrestrained money printing in Zimbabwe, which led to hyperinflation, was facilitated by massive government corruption, draconian political and economic controls, and widespread expropriation and destruction of farms and other productive enterprises. These preconditions for hyperinflation do not exist in any advanced market-based economy. If such circumstances do arise someday in the U.S., backing our fiat money with government bonds will not save the country from a financial meltdown; it will likely make matters worse.
Reparations didn’t lead to hyperinflation. Literally a Keynesian myth. Germany actually barely paid its reparations. It was much closer to the Zimbabwean model you just outlined.
https://youtu.be/dR-4RTSJ_yo
He also advances a rather anti-economic argument that $10K you spend intentionally is different than $10K you spend on accident because, uh, special circumstances. There's certainly a case to be had that contextual situations, amounts, and outlooks were different, but that's not the argument he's making. He's basically saying "That debt is different because they didn't expect to have to spend that money."
Really?? Show me where the article says or implies that. The basic point of the article is that debt-free fiat money is superior to debt-backed fiat money (though inferior to gold or other hard money).
Them roosters gonna roost or what?
Part of me hopes this hits good and hard. Nothing lesser has woken up DC.
It's beginning to look a lot like 1970.
It's worse in at least one major way: the debt to GDP ratio in the 70s was like 20%, it's not 100+%. As interest rates go up, that will matter a lot.
Moore's Law observed that the number of transistors on a chip doubled every two years. We've reached the end of that since transistors are down to the molecular level and they can't get any smaller.
sarc's Law observed that the national debt roughly doubled every presidential term since Reagan. We're reaching the end of that since the financing on the debt is reaching a significant part of the budget.
I really don't know what happens. I have very, very little hope on the short term though.
I even have made $30,030 just in five weeks straightforwardly working part-time from my apartment. (res-32) Immediately when I've lost my last business, I was exhausted and luckily I found this top online task & with this I am in a position to obtain thousands directly through my home. Everybody is able to get this best career & can gain more dollars on-line going this article.
that is what I do.>> https://Www.Profit97.Com
I was born in the 70’s, so I could be ignorant on the topic, but we’re in a much worse situation now.
Besides the economy, we now have a blatant, two tiered system of justice based on politics. There’s been about a dozen acts of violence and vandalism against pregnancy centers and churches once the RvW leak, and an organization has identified itself as part of this, and is encouraging more of it. A near attempt to assassinate a Supreme Court Justice. This is textbook domestic terrorism and it’s being ignored by our justice department.
That is actually exactly like the late 60s and 70s.
Hoover and the FBI actually went after the hippies. Even manufactured evidence to convict some.
I'm pretty scared.
I know - bell bottoms.
the word "wonk" lost all meaning once it found regular use to non-ironically describe Elizabeth Warren
Yeah, I can't imagine her descriptor having anything to do with great interest in intricate minutiae and details of anything.
Well, anything other than grandstanding and utilizing the internets to give her an outsized level of public visibility. She was a pioneer of things like using 50 centers to get posts about her on the front page of Reddit.
But her policy positions are almost entirely based on unworkable theoretical solutions meant to stoke emotions, but that she can only put forth knowing her entire party and the Rs will never let them happen. She's not a wonk, she's a propagandist.
chasm between author and reader ... they're fucking destroying everything on purpose is not Bad Deficit Math
You sound like you read the democrat party platform - - - - - -
Your economic analyses would be a lot more credible if Reason didn't write such garbage on the economics of "free trade", "comparative advantage", and "open borders".
Interesting how you lump those three together. What exactly does Reason get wrong on them?
Your article analysis would be a lot more credible if you didn't write such garbage comments.
I would add that he left out their abject retardation on cabotage rules. Where they, with brazen stupidity, say things like 'Stuff in Hawaii or PR is expensive because ships flagged out of China can't ship between US ports the way ships flagged out of Germany can ship to other ports in the EU.'
so Diya here https://diyashetty.com/
Welcome to the consequences of National Socialism / Central Planning.... It's not like you leftard dipsh*ts weren't told exactly this again and again... Too bad your ignorance is beyond psychotic...
Where would the USA be today if Democrats hadn't created the Federal Reserve to "central plan" the economy and gold and silver coinage was still the median of trade??? Well; The USA would probably still be a free yet thousands of times stronger nation as it was headed to be...
But you Nazi's just keep conquering and destroying for you own lazy greed... Packing Gov-Guns around preaching how STEALING and DICTATING citizens is "necessary" to sustain your laziness while pretending it's for you 'poor' pals. Running around grazing everyone else's grass until there's nothing left instead of focusing on being productive (a benefit to society) and *earning* anything.