Armed Man Arrested Near Brett Kavanaugh's House
Police stopped him a block away from Kavanaugh's Chevy Chase home, where he allegedly admitted he was there to kill the justice.

Late last night, police in Montgomery County, Maryland, arrested a man near the home of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
According to NBC News, the suspect—26-year-old Nicholas Roske from Simi Valley, California—was found with a gun, a knife, pepper spray, and "burglary tools." Police stopped him a block away from Kavanaugh's Chevy Chase home, where he allegedly admitted he was there to kill the justice.
NBC further reports that Roske initially contacted authorities himself, indicating that he had "homicidal thoughts" and "had traveled from California" with a gun "to attack the justice." Officials told The Washington Post, which first broke the story, that Roske was upset over the recent leaked draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade, as well as recent mass shootings. News of his arrest was confirmed by the Supreme Court. He has been charged with attempted murder.
Speaking of political violence: tomorrow night, the House Select Committee tasked with investigating the January 6 attack will air its first public hearing. The committee's investigation entails political violence on one particular date, committed by partisans on one side of the political aisle. But political violence is neither new nor one-sided. While supporters of then-outgoing President Donald Trump erected a gallows on U.S. Capitol grounds that day, a few months earlier and a few miles away, pro-labor protesters constructed a guillotine outside the Washington, D.C., home of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
A 2020 survey showed that 36 percent of Republicans and 33 percent of Democrats said it would be "a little" justified "to use violence in advancing [their side's] political goals." This was an increase from 30 percent for each side just a few months earlier. In February of last year, 56 percent of Republicans indicated that violence could be appropriate "to arrest the decline of the traditional American way of life," a sentiment that 35 percent of independents and 22 percent of Democrats agreed with.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nothing can be done says only nation where this regularly happens.
Are you suggesting that the US is the only nation where people threaten to murder public officials? Because that's insane, if that's what you're saying. Otherwise I'm just confused by this comment.
Once you accept there is literally no connection between what left wingers assert and reality your confusion should be cleared up.
I think that n00bdragon is being sarcastic. Not sure.
Yes, it was sarcasm. I was having a laugh at how that line gets trotted out only for certain types of gun crimes. I probably should have used a :^) or something.
My apologies, I just didn't get it, I guess.
Poe's Law to blame.
In fairness, it was kind of an awkward joke. I saw the 0 comments and I rushed to write something as fast as I could.
It's the headline in the Onion for all these shootings
Lancaster - attempted murder is the same as J6 protestors that harmed nobody but did some property damage. (But no criticism of BLM riots and their associated damage and body count. Mostly peaceful protesting, that's all!) But, BOTH SIDES!!!
Reason editors, this is why we slam you constantly.
Erecting a gallows is a figurative gesture-suggesting that the public figures you dislike should be "hanged." But it really is expressing a desire that they be removed from office or their station, which can be accomplished through the peaceful transfer of power we have in place known as elections. You need to do more than point to a demonstration of free speech to claim that the gallows is an actual threat of violence.
Somehow this article about someone making actual threats and then taking actions in furtherance of those threats (in this case, traveling across the country to someone's private residence) had to reference something that happened a year and a half ago that was a symbolic gesture.
Agreed. I support both J6 protestors and BLM/Progressive protestors from the gallow/guiltotine theatrics. Unless that threat turns into a specific call to actually harm somebody, they are protected speech/protesting.
This is 100% NOT political violence. Antifa trying to burn down federal buildings in Portland, that is violent. BLM riots that killed dozens and caused 10s of billions in damage, that is violence.
A couple hundred noobs breaking a few windows and running around the Congress building taking selfies; sorry, hard to call that violence compared to the progressive violence that was committed before it, that Reason/MSM/Progressives simple labeled "peaceful protesting".
I'm fine with condemning everyone who rioted on Jan 6. But call a spade a spade-it was a riot. Letting the media continue to call it an insurrection is a failure of right-wing messaging. Being honest about what it was is different than condoning it.
The difference between Jan. 6 and most riots driven by leftists is that they didn't come back out the next day to continue protesting/rioting. Conservative protests typically shut down if there's any property damage or violence, but left wing/progressive protests fail to distance themselves from criminal activity the same way. They allow riots to last for days and even weeks and claim it's somehow acceptable to continue protesting even when it gives cover to rioters.
Mass violence against leftists at all levels and full on revolution is the only thing that will save you, your family, and your freedom.
Tell me why I'm wrong?
*Because most of us have friends and family that are “leftist” and violent political pogroms are distasteful unless absolutely necessary.
* civil wars, coups, and revolutions rarely turn out as advertised (even the 76ers got replaced by the Hamiltonians).
* Historically, even the illusion of political legitimacy is valuable sometimes. Once it’s completely gone, all bets are off.
*and most people constantly go on about shooting liberals are either keyboard warriors and/or feds, so don’t expect them to be there to help once the shit really goes down.
So, do nothing and hope for the best?
Because yea, totalitarians are going to just stop all on their own accord
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1534877239203926016?t=cLkIIgCrjHAbyJQ7PzOIXg&s=19
Biden predicts "mini revolution" in November if SCOTUS overturns Roe v. Wade
[Link]
People can get off of their lazy asses and vote. If all of the "conservatives" who don't vote because candidate isn't pure enough, then they don't get it: you never get everything you want, and it's better to keep the ball from making it ever closer to the opponents goalposts than to wait on the bench forever for the perfect candidate.
LOL
"Letting the media continue to call it an insurrection is a failure of right-wing messaging."
They were going to call it an insurrection regardless of what happened.
Trump literally ended his speech by saying "Now go home in love and peace", and the psychopaths still call it incitement.
And when you look at the pictures of the Democrats burning DC during Trump's inauguration in Jan 2017 and compare those riots to the J6 selfie parade, you realize that it's a deliberate fiddle.
They were going to call it an insurrection regardless of what happened.
Which is my point. Whatever passes for conservative media conceded this way too early and never sufficiently mocked this. Conservatives are generally horrified by rioting and were quick to condemn, but letting the left spin this into their talking point was ceding far too much ground.
The right does this regularly. They let the left craft the message because they have no spine. I voted for Trump not because I liked him (he's a terrible human being) but because for once the Republicans ran a guy nationally who had some fight in him. Sadly, he didn't do the things he needed to do from day one.
" But call a spade a spade-it was a riot."
Utter horseshit.
After an entire summer of "mostly peaceful protests" what happened on J6 was a relative nothingburger.
Maybe had people spoken otherwise while entire blocks of cities were violently commandeered, businesses were destroyed, and people were flagrantly murdered you might have a point.
But that ship sailed and you watched it happen in real time.
So take your both sides and shove it up your ass.
"Erecting a gallows is a figurative gesture-suggesting that the public figures you dislike should be "hanged.""
And despite that sort of figurative gesture being present at all sorts of protests (as well as guillotine props) on both sides of the aisle, we'll be hearing about "Hang Mike Pence" for the rest of our lives like it is somehow beyond the pale.
I predict the left wing media will provide very little news coverage or criticism of this attempted murder today/tonight, and instead will focus most of their coverage on Pelosi's partisan attack on Trump and his supporters over Jan 6 (even though Pelosi was responsible for the entire fiasco by rejecting Trump's request for 10,000 National Guard troops).
Predict? It's right here in the article.
But as I expected, it generated very little coverage or criticism by CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NYT, WaPo, and other left wing propaganda media.
Why the angry Kavanaugh photo?
If the DNC was dispatching assassins to your house, you think you'd be smiling?
You know why.
Because they're angry the assassination attempt wasn't successful.
When the current illegitimate regime is removed, it is very important to place all these violent leftist groups (BLM, antifa, the democrat party, etc.) on terror watchlists.
Police stopped him a block away from Kavanaugh's Chevy Chase home, where he allegedly admitted he was there to kill the justice.
Allegedly. Let's hold tight to these journalistic standards. This isn't like January 6 or anything.
I'll just say I think this is a very troubled individual. He notified law enforcement in advance of going to the house, and then surrendered peacefully to officers. He wanted to be arrested, for whatever reason. I think we should steal treat it as a threat, but I also believe this guy has issues and wants to be locked up and was making a statement in the process.
Yeah, not sure that crosses the "credible" threshold...
" In February of last year, 56 percent of Republicans indicated that violence could be appropriate "to arrest the decline of the traditional American way of life," a sentiment that 35 percent of independents and 22 percent of Democrats agreed with."
The specific question was:
"“The traditional American way of life is disappearing so fast that we may have to use force to save it.”"
That isn't "violence". It is force. Guess what? Arresting a criminal is force, while we might not call it violence. Defending a trade route or fighting a rogue regime is force.
Could it be that most of these people were actually talking about using political violence similar to the riot at the capitol? maybe. But we can't know based on that question.
I'm pleased we're being very careful to not turn this event into a partisan culture war squabble. Let's stick to a cautious "bowf sidez" approach here and focus on what's important, the violent, deadly Republican-led Jan. 6 insurrection.
Speaking of political violence: tomorrow night, the House Select Committee tasked with investigating the January 6 attack will air its first public hearing.
Someone may have been trying to assassinate a Supreme Court judge.
Now, back to January 6... over to you, Bob.
Apparently, some bullets traveling around in a gun were picked up by the cops near Kavanaugh’s house.
Schumer not hardest hit, more's the shame.
“Speaking of political violence...”
Somebody missed the poisoning-the-well journalism class.
Gee, this has nothing to do with progressive rhetoric for the past several decades, I'm sure. This just proves that we need stricter gun control laws. Ignore the knife and the pepper spray. Focus on the gun.
ZIP TIES!!! HE HAD ZIP TIES!!!
He didn't even bring them. They belonged to the Hill Police. He picked them up from a table inside and hung a flag with them.
Poor White Mike. All his narratives fell apart in a cloud of fire extinguisher foam. No deadly fire extinguishers, no poop smeared walls, no zip-tie holocaust, no guns, no knives, even his molotov cocktail story fell apart.
So basically, all things are going to point back to Jan 6th for some reason? Why was it even brought up? It's just sort of inserted just before the end of the article, apropos of nothing. It could have been more pertinent to bring up Rittenhouse or something since, you know, a firearm was actually involved (unless you want to count the cop killing that woman).
You people just can't help yourselves.
TDS is terminal is most cases.
>>But political violence is neither new nor one-sided.
there *was* that Revolutionary War thing ... the hundred man march 1/6 was ridiculously far from violence
And what was sieging the white house? Chopped liver?
According to Reason editors, mostly peaceful protest! But they're not far left progressives or anything.
>>sieging the white house?
Dolly Madison made it out.
Fox's "Five" had a clip of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Shumer telling Kavanaugh that he will "pay a heavy price" and he "won't know what hit him" if Roe v. Wade is overturned. Sounds like Schumer is predicting (and maybe even welcoming) a kill shot to the head, but this will be dismissed as "fiery rhetoric" and Shumer is in no danger of being punished, impeached, defeated at the polls, or banned from any commencement exercises.
The Five also had Tulsi on the last couple days. Which is really all that matters.
This is Schumer’s fault. If the midterms go the right way he should be expelled from the senate.
I love the little bit of "what-about-ism" comparing the riot on the capital to the childish protest outside Bezos' house.
Am I sympathetic to the people who implicitly threatened Bezos? Absolutely not, and in a perfect world, they would (and should) be prosecuted -- for illegally gathering outside the man's house, assuming that is a crime.... but to directly compare that with the literal plot to attack the Capitol, which resulted in literal deaths as well as literal threats to the VPOTUS, is to be disingenuous — not only did the Capitol riot encompass all the illegality of the Bezos protest (illegal assembly, trespassing, terroristic threats, and the like), it was certainly more illegal and more violent and far more nefarious.
Fuck off, Joe Lancaster, you're an assistant editor for a Reason
Your "literal deaths" were all caused by the Capitol Police.
https://taylerhansen.substack.com/p/capitol-offense-the-ugly-truth-behind
^ this is great satire machine. well done
If a conservative justice was killed, Biden would nominate and dems would push to confirm a new justice before the conservative justice’s blood was cold.
By the way, this piece is as good of a place as any to remind people once again that Reason editor in chief Matt Welch openly advocates on social media for the political murdering of people he doesn't like:
"Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know. #RedWedding2"
-Matt Welch
https://twitter.com/MattWelch/status/1102654202545913857
(For those of you who weren't at all fans of the show Game of Thrones, the "Red Wedding" was a surprise massacre.)
Well, damn. I didn't know that. Makes me rethink my subscription a bit
Not exactly a very libertarian or tolerant sentiment, is it?
Spoiler Warning!
That was March 4, did something happen that day he was linking it to?
I love the little bit of "what-about-ism" comparing the riot on the capital to the childish protest outside Bezos' house.
Am I sympathetic to the people who implicitly threatened Bezos? Absolutely not, and in a perfect world, they would (and should) be prosecuted -- for illegally gathering outside the man's house, assuming that is a crime.... but to directly compare that with the literal plot to attack the Capitol, which resulted in literal deaths as well as literal threats to the VPOTUS, is to be disingenuous — not only did the Capitol riot encompass all the illegality of the Bezos protest (illegal assembly, trespassing, terroristic threats, and the like), it was certainly more illegal and more violent and far more nefarious.
Fuck off, Joe Lancaster, you're an assistant editor for a Reason
The only death in that "attack" of the capitol was a woman who was just walking around. 99% of the people inside that capitol were let in by cops and were not part of any "plan" whatsoever.
The American left, increasingly hijacked childish radicals and hypocrites, love to dwell on J6 because that's only of few instances of widespread political violence on the right they can manage to find. Nearly all forms of political violence comes from their side.
Speaking of insurrection - armed antifa radicals took over a street, created a pseudo nation, and put up borders and armed guards with material support from the city. They shot half a dozen people and ended up killing at least two black people. And that's just a small sample from the left wing playbook.
Of course equivalency games don't make sense, because again, the left owns the (political) violence in this nation. Remeber the time conservatives burned down cities for legalizing gay marriage and drugs? Any religious groups sending protestrs to illegally harass SC justices? Yeah me neither. Only when you narrow parse crime into some small "domestic extremism" category does the right wing come ahead. There's 30 of those a year. Baltimore alone has 200 plus murders a year.
supporters of then-outgoing President Donald Trump erected a gallows on U.S. Capitol grounds that day, a few months earlier and a few miles away, pro-labor protesters constructed a guillotine outside the Washington, D.C., home of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
That's nothing. I put up a pink flamingo, and six garden gnomes around an Xmas creche in my front yard.
Must be a leftist since they didn't shoot her
https://twitter.com/BillFOXLA/status/1534691643785236481?t=pBoc9MgbGDs0SeRJjtPvxA&s=19
Protester taken down by Secret Service after walking into a motorcade in downtown LA at Summit of the Americas. @FoxNews
[Video]
https://twitter.com/ClayTravis/status/1534697722283958274?t=oc_3TiuehbmEIn1znx9n6Q&s=19
Early this morning a left wing activist tried to assassinate Brett Kavanaugh at his home. This evening protesters showed up outside his house. How in the world are all of them not immediately arrested for violating federal law? This is insanity.
[Link]
They probably are staying the minimum distance from his house to be in compliance with the law. Either that, or nobody is bothering to enforce this law. I think it’s only a matter of time before there will be another leftist lunatic who succeeds where this most recent one has failed.
And then the left will try to score points by owning republicans on "gun violence".
Remember, Tucker Carlson and conservatives are singularly responsible for the mass shooting in Buffalo. They're also responsible deranged leftist who tried to assassinate an SC judge because they weren't down with gun control.
Garland.
'Roske initially contacted authorities himself, indicating that he had "homicidal thoughts" and "had traveled from California" with a gun "to attack the justice."'
Well there's your problem.
Why aren't more people appropriately outraged at how many STATE LINES he had to cross to make that trip?
The shootings that Rittenhouse did took place within 20-30 miles of his house (the closest major commercial airport to Simi Valley might be farther away than that), and yet all anyone that wanted his balls in a vise could seem to care about was that "HE CROSSED STATE LINES"
Does anyone think the network news organizations are going to send reporters to stick a mic in chuck schumer's face after asking him if he feels responsible?
Can confirm.
As one who grew up in Lancaster County, I think it is one of the best places to live in America (very low crime, honest people, friendly neighbors and very few left wingers).
What goes clop, clop, BANG, clop clop?
A Dutchie drive-by.
1. They’re lying when they say they’re libertarian.
2. They’re intellectually lazy.
3. No
NYT when they publish a Stossel article now and then. Fuck, even Sheldon Richman’s shit was good compared to what we see now. One of the few things they did right in recent years was to 86 Shitty Shikha.
Reason has gone to shit lately, more so than normal. Sullum is the best of the bad lot anymore. At least he is consistent on the 2A.
I agree-- but, a band of retarded shit-hurling monkeys would have also been able to keep inflation and gas prices lower than our current government.
Unless you grew up near Scranton and have better benchmark for shit.
"Sullum is the best of the bad lot anymore."
That should not be viewed as faint praise, that is properly understood as an indictment.
Sullum is simply more subtle that the cheaper-by-the-dozen progtard children that Reason has been hiring of late.
Consider this effort
https://reason.com/2022/06/08/would-these-4-gun-controls-prevent-mass-shootings/
Please take careful note of the Utilitarian analysis and the unstated assumptions that
A. This is a 'problem' that warrants government intervention and is within it's purview.
B. The proposed 'solutions' are actually intended to solve the problem and do not evince other motives and goals.
Rather than going into the weeds any further I would suggest that you merely file this away for future reference to compare and contrast tone and content when Sullum addresses some sort of legislative program from President Trump or President DeSantis.
Because rest assured the differences will be striking.