'Woke Capitalism' Does Not Advance Social Justice
It incentivizes high-noise, low-cost signaling rather than actual cultural changes.

Many people on the right fear "woke capitalism" and the idea that corporate executives will bend to pressure to advance a vision of the world that replaces their values with progressive ones. To those who are worried, I say, be grateful for the profit motive. To the progressives pushing for such practices, I say, be careful what you wish for.
Regular free-market capitalism has no conflict with companies spending their own money in pursuit of whatever goals they choose. Milton Friedman himself wouldn't raise an eyebrow over a devoted LTBGQ baker who bakes cakes only for same-sex weddings or a company that only hires workers from underrepresented minorities. But woke capitalism gets more controversial when the likes of Delta Air Lines, JPMorgan Chase, and Apple use inflammatory and questionable talking points against Georgia's voting-reform legislation, or when Major League Baseball pulls its All-Star Game from that state in protest.
"Woke" is a loaded, political term. The passion it triggers obstructs the fact that behind the whole concept there is a genuine set of values, and many of them—like tolecurance and equality of opportunity—are worth promoting. However, when practiced by corporations under pressure from vocal customers, employees, or even investors, woke capitalism often incentivizes high-noise, low-cost signaling rather than actual cultural changes.
There is some evidence, for instance, that some companies are more likely to be woke when it won't cost them many customers. I don't know whether that was on Delta executives' minds when, in 2018, they used a very public announcement to end a travel discount for NRA members flying to its annual convention. But with only 13 customers benefiting from the discount, Delta lost almost nothing. The company's wokeness didn't increase its share prices, according to at least one analysis, and there's no reason to believe it decreased gun violence.
Other companies talk a big game but make no actual changes to their business models. A case in point is the group of 136 companies that first signed on to the Business Roundtable's statement on the "Purpose of a Corporation," which boasts a commitment to deliver value not just to shareholders, but to all "stakeholders," including customers, employees, suppliers, and communities. Yet two years after the signing, the companies' updated corporate governance guidelines showed no real change or attempt to elevate stakeholders. Most of them even reiterated their commitment to shareholders' primacy. Eighty-five percent didn't even report signing it in a proxy statement sent to their shareholders. The ones that mentioned it didn't add how they would change their business models.
More dispiriting examples include Wells Fargo employees interviewing "diverse" candidates even though positions had already been filled. The same thing seemed to happen to former Miami Dolphins head coach Brian Flores, who interviewed for the New York Giants' top coaching job three days after they allegedly promised it to a white candidate. Flores argues in a discrimination lawsuit that the team circumvented the NFL's diversity-driven Rooney Rule.
Disheartening, too, are the recent firings of low-level employees at various companies for minor offenses following Twitter mob campaigns.
Behind this whole mess is the progressive belief that demanding that a company sell you some mayonnaise with a side of social justice will be profitable for the cause and business. Both are unlikely. Attempts at measuring the profitability of wokeness reveal that many companies that build politically correct actions into their strategies could lose serious income and turn off large chunks of their consumer bases. Lost profits are bad for business sustainability, as Netflix's CEO seems to have finally understood.
And who benefits from displays of woke virtue signaling? While they may not realize it, it's not those who hope and demand that companies be used as agents of change. It's not communities or members of underrepresented minorities, either. Nor does this theater bestow much benefit on the companies who do the virtue signaling.
This explains why some on the left are now speaking up against woke capitalism. As Helen Lewis wrote in The Atlantic a few years ago, "If you care about progressive causes, then woke capitalism isn't your friend."
The path forward is for CEOs and other company leaders to drop the culture warrior pretense and return their focus to supplying quality outputs to all their customers. Just as important, though, is for woke warriors to stop demanding that companies produce outcomes they aren't designed to deliver and instead focus on persuading people that their values are worth adopting.
COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ok, which one of you clowns snuck the libertarian in here?
It was me. I admit it. I wrote some strongly worded letters and they appear to be working.
Maybe someone really is reading the comments?
They're certainly not reading the articles.
The one that thinks "woke" is about equality of opportunity? Not a fucking libertarian unless your idea of such is lies about liberal value to further the marxist woke cause.
^
Equality of Opportunity is in there somewhere.
It gets lost in the fact of so many of the woke activists are looking for perfect equality of outcome as the only acceptable proof that it's happening. From what I hear those activists would be losing their shit if they ever looked into what the actual results have been in many of the scandanavian countries they claim to want to be emulating.
Reason seems to be about 2-3 years late on every actual libertarian concern. Only when it becomes overly dangerous and clownish.
I suppose that's why we're all still here. Better late than never, I guess?
'Woke Capitalism' Does Not Advance Social Justice
Sure it does, it helps reinforce the aristocracy's stranglehold over the peasants.
Social Justice really is the type of Elitist "Holier than Thou" signaling that Elites have always pushed on the masses. In the past, it was merely Kings and Queens proclaiming their "Service" to their subjects from their summer estate.
In the past it was the crusaders, the jacobins, the kkk, the lenninists, the nazis, the khmer Rouge, the red guard, etc
‘Social justice’ is just a bullshit term for social Marxism. Which must be eliminated.
I've always thought social justice meant "you get what you earned," whether it be money, praise, respect from others, etc. The quest for the unearned is what's killing our liberty and, eventually, our way of life.
Equal outcomes regardless of inputs. Which is the epitome of the social justice movement.
That’s not at all what social justice means.
I know that's not what it means to those who use the term. But I use my definition as a discussion point and let them try to prove me wrong, that one shouldn't get what one has earned.
Then you’re playing their game.
SILLY BULLSHIT
Bingo. Another "Libertarian cases for violating liberty" article in reason.
I haven't figured out Disney's Marvel yet.
It’s easier if you read comic books going back 50 years.
And stop reading them when you hit about 20 years ago, absolutely do not go past 10 years ago if you value your sanity.
They’re not all bad, but it’s minefield of woke bullshit now. Like Superman’s teenage son turning bi. They can’t retcon that shit out fast enough.
Don't worry. At some point they'll just reboot everything in a new universe like they always do.
Yeah, DC appears to be on a 5-7 year ‘reboot the universe’ cycle. So they can de-wokify things.
This, I used to love comics and every Wed was like Christmas for me, I compleatly stopped reading about 5 years ago and it sounds like I missed nothing
SILLY BULLSHIT
This article is only about 4-7 years late, but you deserve a participation award to go with your Cali award Reason.
Article looks to be a reprint from somewhere else. So another reminder that Reason needs to hire libertarian writers to get libertarian articles.
Oh that's a good one, worthy of OBL!
She doesn't really even work here, she works for National Review and they just post her syndicated column here
And she's not even consistently good
Or libertarian at all, as this article proves.
It's weird to write an article on this and not mention the whole ESG thing pushed by huge hedge funds like Blackrock
Yeah, the E is supposed to stand for "Environmental", but they have no problem booting the premier electric car maker from their ESG index, in favor of a big oil company.
I heard there is a company who is not on their list because they're invested in ExxonMobil... who is now on their list
It’s ok, you can say Tesla.
Ever really look into the total carbon cost of those batteries?
Has anyone actually looked into the disposal/recovery costs associated with those batteries when they deplete?
I would favor requiring that electric cars can only be recharged directly from windmills, no intermediate battery storage.
Flores argues in a discrimination lawsuit that the team circumvented the NFL's diversity-driven Rooney Rule.
Which is a bullshit Affirmative Action policy entirely based on signaling. Flores wasn't discriminated against-the team knew exactly who they wanted to hire, but they were contractually obligated to pretend they were interested in hiring him. It's not racist to have a very specific candidate you want to hire.
To those who are worried, I say, be grateful for the profit motive.
My main concern is that companies are overvaluing the market participation of Facebook and Twitter users and actually aren't making intelligent decisions based on profit motives. It's bowing to a woke mob who are a tiny fraction of the customer base and don't speak for the silent majority.
Additionally, it's not "the free market" when the mafia is threatening to burn down your store unless you pay a protection fee. That's extortion, people willing to leverage power disproportionately where they don't have sufficient economic sway to get what they want. The woke mob isn't that different from the Russian mob or the Italian mob.
The problem is that many of the people advising these CEOs and the like are themselves Woke SJWs. And their board has also put several of these people on as well.
You're talking about people speaking their opinion in public. That's the "leverage" you're talking about.
So, do you want the government to force private businesses to make better choices, or do you want the government to force customers to shut up? Both?
“So, do you want the government to force private businesses to make better choices”
That’s already happening. Do you imagine we don’t know you’re lying about it? Is that why you show up here spouting your bullshit?
I’m sincerely interested in the thought process of someone that knows they’re lying, who's lying to people that know you’re lying, and yet you lie anyway, knowing that no one believes your lies.
Is it simply you’re paid to lie? Is it a sexual arousal thing, lying to people that know you’re lying, some sort of a masochistic mental disorder?
Seriously, all bullshit aside, I find your obsession with lying to people that know you’re lying fascinating. I’d like to understand it. Any insight would be helpful. Can I speak to any of your parents?
I'm just asking you to clarify your position. Whom do you want government to force to do what.
If you don't want government to get involved in either business decisions or free speech, then what are you doing? Spitting into the wind about something some private actor is doing you don't like?
If that's what we're doing here, I have a list about a billion miles long. What would you like me to gripe about first? There's a pothole near my neighborhood that fucks me off, for one.
Exactly
If you cannot make your case that woke marxist values are a good thing, lie. This seems to be the MO of Reason on any cultural topic these days.
Woke = postmodern nazism
Nobody could be remotely rational and be in favor of "equality of outcome." So it's strongly likely that your description is a strawman.
Politicians who are supposedly against "equality of outcome" consistently vote against any policy that would provide even the barest equality of opportunity, so why don't they go fuck themselves for being the actual monsters?
"Nobody could be remotely rational and be in favor of "equality of outcome." So it's strongly likely that your description is a strawman."
Nope, it's very clear that equality of outcome is exactly what they mean when they talk about equity rather than equality.
I'm sure that would be convenient for you as you search for rationalizations for voting for psychopathic monsters to rule us, but it's obviously an absurd claim. No rational person could even begin to build a theory of how to achieve equal outcomes. Not on this planet.
But if they weren't this ridiculous strawman in your head, you'd have to actually think about the issue, right?
Have you not seen the graphic with the people trying to look over the fence and because of the magic of "equity", they all get to see?
Look up the Wikipedia article about rational irrationality, then read the part about epistemic rationality vs. instrumental rationality.
Tolecurance is the torture you will be subjected to until you admit women can have dicks and children can be castrated without parental notification.
You want children to be forced to give birth to their fathers' rape babies, so thanks for your concern.
Which is super duper rare. Now do the other 99.9% of abortions.
None of the state's business.
What a fucked up thing to say. I’m sorry your father raped your sister/mother. You should consider therapy. Ranting at strangers on the internet is not a healthy way to deal with these issues though.
Fuck man, father’s rape babies? Actually makes me have some sympathy for you. Therapy man, get some therapy. You might be lost, but it’s worth a shot.
Good Kid Productions on "Woke Capitalism" based around ESG standards and how fucked up it all is.
Shorter: Why does Facebook pretend to be racist? Because it pays to play along.
I really dug this one too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8xWOlk3WIw
" . . . and many of them—like tolecurance and equality of opportunity—are worth promoting . . . '
Well, Veronique, perhaps you should look at the implementation of those policies, and note in concept and in action, tolerant and equal are the last thing they are.
(and get a better spell checker)
What's tolecurance?
Googled it. No results. Typo.
Lol. Can't even make this shit up. Judge in Sussman case says text of sussman telling baker he was coming on his own and not for a client can't be used to prove false statements to baker.
On the theory the evidence didn't exist at times of indictment. Because the fbi didn't turn over the text until the IG investigation.
Just ridiculous.
Yes the judge is an Obama appointee.
Got a link where I can read about this in particular?
Just use any search engine but Google.
Simple - stop listening to the people who work in HR.
https://twitter.com/NoahPollak/status/1529973485816012800?t=2YT2S3G93J_TqcCwnApGLA&s=19
Friend who lives in Manhattan sends pic of this subway ad courtesy of the NYC Dept of Health. Heroin addiction -- it's empowering!
[Pic]
Addiction is a medical condition, asshole. We tried it your way. We got the largest prison population on earth and people overdosing in streets.
But give your general attitude, presumably that's how you want to treat people with other medical conditions too. Lock up the cancer patients! Let them rot! They're icky!
Fucking libertarians can't even do drugs right anymore.
Libertarians believe in personal responsibility. A concept alien to your kind.
Really, because I got a bunch of libertarians saying that parents and teachers aren't capable of being personally responsible and dealing with children's private issues but instead want the state to start policing bathrooms. Libertarians can barely open their mouths without explaining what they want the government to force people to do these days.
But I'm glad you're the old school type who thinks cancer victims ought to die on the street for the crime of not being rich enough to afford chemo.
Overdose on heroin, bitch.
I’m sorry you’re an addict. Impotent screeching at others isn’t helpful though. Good luck.
"Woke" is a highly charged political word. Let's use it in a sentence except we'll define it in context.
Republicans think wokeness, or the practice of arguably being too polite to minorities, is about a million times more serious an issue than 20 kids being ripped apart by bullets in their classroom on any random day.
But you know what the riven corpses of children can't do? Be arguably too polite to minorities. So checkmate libs.
So expected of you to stand on top of murdered children to spout your hatred.
Hatred? You mad that I hate Republicans?
I hate Republicans. Every last psychopathic one of you. The blood on your hands will never come out in a thousand years.
Go burn in hell where at least you can be thankful that the dead children are in heaven, at least as long as they used the correct bathroom.
Tony, YOU killed those kids. With your democrat votes. Your fellow travelers who run the government schools emasculate young boys for being boys, then pump the full of mind altering drugs for same. Which turns them into violent misanthropic killers. Then you disarm the schools with your defund the police bullshit.
YOU have an ocean of blood on YOUR hands. You and all your fellow travelers should do the right thing and commit mass suicide.
Disarm the schools? When were schools armed?
You're insane, and you need to turn off all media you consume and start afresh. Try NPR.
In 1985 we had guns all over my school in Southern CA. There was a marksmanship course behind the gym and several of us had rifles or shotguns in our vehicles on campus for hunting after school.
I was in high school and in my teens at the time.
You mad that I hate Republicans?
I’m not mad about anything. I just think you are filled with hatred. It’s sad.
See you at the next book burning or coup attempt.
A prime example of this nonsensical "woke" business are the pro sports leagues . . . right up there at the front with their virtue signaling, paying $gazillions to players, but doing nothing to provide economic relief for the "stakeholders" . . . the ones who pay the high prices for tickets and cable TV subscriptions.
It’s all bullshit. Every single woke thing is.
https://twitter.com/Yankees/status/1529973777647521799?t=YoEYAqqTuBIejfpe_eQRZA&s=19
Each year, more than 4,100 Latinx people die from gun violence in the U.S. and 13,300 are shot and wounded.
Every time I see the phrase "gun violence", I think "Here's someone who would not care about it if the victims had been beaten to death with rocks instead."
Ticket prices are pocket change as are TV subscriptions.
The virtue signaling is for a chance for a future. Woke companies as well as most of the US Federal government see the future as China, not the US.
Signal compliance today or in 20XX when the purges come, you will be first up against the wall.
Wokeism is an insurance policy.
When you take away virtue signaling what are progs left with? NADA! This has been going on for decades BTW, I remember a girl I dated in the early 1990s refused to get gas at Shell because they supported South Africa’s then Apartheid government. I asked her if other oil companies were any better and she couldn’t answer that.
I say, be grateful for the profit motive......
LOL... Wasn't it not even 90-days ago Reason ran an article about the new Stimulus Bill FUNDING journalism????
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-google-facebook-would-not-exist-without-government-funding
This whole 'progressive' indoctrination is being PAID FOR by Gov-Gun Robbery.... THAT IS THE PROBLEM...... Otherwise; no one would pay for such garbage.
In general, I think woke-ism in the general public is ridiculous - it's purely signaling with no change where it matters. But if a company does some miniscule adjustments, doesn't the accumulation of small adjustments amount to something bigger? Most discrepancies in pay between minorities and majorities consist of an accumulation of small differences over an extended period of time. No single act can be identified as significant, but small, 2% difference in raises over generations can be pretty substantial.
The author is assuming a free market that hasn't existed since forever if ever.
Many "Woke" companies are paid by federal tax dollars. They don't care about servicing you. They are in service to the Feds and the Chinese.
Look at your ISP...
I have zero tolecurance for neologisms created by cats walking over keyboards.
Stanford Business School invited Jordan Peterson over recently to discuss how they can navigate the "woke agenda" that is creeping into their institution. Would love to have been a fly on the wall for that meeting.
Hi! I would like to share with you a great find. The fact is that I have been in business for a long time, but I could not decide to just start my business abroad. And then I was recommended to register a company in hong kong because there are really excellent conditions for this. They helped me register a company in hong kong. I am very pleased with their services, flexibility and efficiency.