Review: The Second Shooter
Despite caricaturing (some) gun owners, Nick Mamatas' conspiracy-fueled science fiction novel avoids moralizing in favor of dark humor.

Despite caricaturing (some) gun owners, Nick Mamatas' conspiracy-fueled science fiction novel The Second Shooter avoids moralizing in favor of dark humor. His protagonist is Mike Karras, a cynical anarcho-leftist writer working on a book about mass shooting survivors who claim to have seen second gunmen where official reports say there were none. Karras lives for the dopamine hit of checking his notifications, but never likes what his phone shows him. His arch-nemesis is not a shadowy government agency, but the conspiracy theory–obsessed host of an internet radio show and his devoted fans.
As he travels from the site of an active domestic terror attack in the Midwest to the aftermath of a church shooting in the Bay Area, Karras finds himself becoming a character in the eerie string of violent acts he sets out to chronicle, unable to maintain his privacy or his belief that the people he interviews are mistaken about what they saw.
Chewy hypotheticals abound: If every mass shooting is a psy-op carried out by crisis actors, does that mean we live in a world with no actual mass shootings? If your cellphone was tapped, would you know how to find the nearest pay phone? What if there was a second shooter on the grassy knoll in 1963?
The third-act twist will feel like either a cop-out or a treat, depending on whether your preferences lean toward Jack Reacher or Doctor Who.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
depending on whether your preferences lean toward Jack Reacher or Doctor Who
Which doctor? Because that kind of matters.
I guess that's a thing for Who fans, considering how long it has been on and how many there have been.
From my perspective, if those are the only choices for preferences, then this is a good review. I can go ahead and skip this book entirely.
So if it's science fiction, I'm guess the third act reveals that it's aliens from the future who are the second shooters trying to terraform earth with the blood of shooting victims.