Jerome Powell, Who Wildly Misjudged Inflation, Is Overwhelmingly Reconfirmed as Fed Chair
There is seldom any meaningful accountability for government incompetence.

After presiding over the biggest Federal Reserve failure in 40 years and with inflation rating as the top concern among Americans, Jerome Powell's nomination to a second term as chairman was approved this past week by the Senate, 80–19.
I know the usual arguments for ignoring the Fed's spectacular errors, even at a time when inflation is such an issue. Most common are that other candidates would be even worse or that we need continuity. Maybe. The truth, though, is that a good person facing bad incentives in that job will make poor choices. Add in a lack of accountability and you repeatedly get bad policies. That type of continuity is not that appealing to me.
Inflation is rising globally, but it's much worse in the United States, largely because of the excessive spending legislated in early 2021 via the American Rescue Plan (ARP). Powell was a giddy cheerleader for the $2 trillion, which many warned would cause inflation—especially as the Fed announced it would continue its overly accommodating monetary policy with no end in sight.
When inflation started to pick up, Powell argued that it was "transitory" because it was the product of supply-chain constraints. Apparently, no one at the Fed checked how many goods were getting through the ports. If they had, they would have known that by the end of 2020, more goods were getting through than before the pandemic. Also, in 2021, most countries barely suffered any inflation, which is incompatible with the theory that inflation is caused by global supply-chain disruptions.
And so, right under the chairman's nose, inflation accelerated.
Powell didn't just ignore the Fed's mandate to pursue price stability; he flouted this mandate with "innovative" inflation targeting. This was supposed to allow the economy—and inflation—to run hot in the name not only of reducing unemployment (another Fed mandate), but also the pursuit of shiny goals such as encouraging "inclusive" growth.
When the chairman at the end of 2021 acknowledged that we had inflation, he still did very little about it. He didn't stop the Fed's purchase of treasuries until March 2022. Very small rate hikes were announced well into 2022, which likely will not be enough to tame inflation. Stunningly, many people still believed that those who failed to see inflation coming could engineer something that has never been done successfully in the past: a soft landing.
The reasons for this failure are many. A big one is that most people at the Fed, and in various agencies and outside of government, worship at the altar of Keynesian thinking. They believe that government spending solves all economic problems. Another source of failure is poor incentives. Politicians and bureaucrats (including the chairman) don't have the benefit of profit-and-loss signals sent by the market.
Most bureaucrats in executive agencies are also unelected and unappointed by the Senate, and, thus, are largely unaccountable to the public. Who will, for instance, lose their job at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for their many mistaken COVID-19 recommendations and diktats, including those on school closures and masking? The consequences will be paid by children for years to come but not by those responsible.
The need to secure Senate confirmation is no guarantee that higher-level bureaucrats will be held accountable, as evidenced by Powell's own nomination. But that too could be because senators aren't terribly accountable themselves.
Indeed, research shows that ordinary citizens don't often vote their representatives out of office for their big failures. In part, it's because many voters are rationally ignorant, as most can't or don't keep track of all the votes of everyone in Congress, or even of their own representatives on issues they truly care about.
Voters, for instance, often let politicians get away with failing to deliver on campaign promises. Republicans rarely suffer for claiming to support small government on the campaign trail but spending through the nose while in office. Meanwhile, Democratic legislators pretend to be the big defenders of lower-income voters and small business while supporting every crony program favoring large companies, hindering competition and raising prices at the expense of consumers.
Finally, the now-common practice of voting against a candidate, rather than for one, isn't conducive to accountability, either.
I therefore should not be shocked that Powell's renomination as Fed chairman sailed through the Senate. Under these circumstances, don't be surprised by the continued pursuit of bad policies.
COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
OK, who are the 19 for whom we must compose a 'hero ballad'?
Interestingly, the 19 were a surprisingly bipartisan group; you had Warren and Sanders along with Lee, Rubio, Cruz and Cotton.
All in all, 6 Democrats (including Sanders, who's technically not a (D) but a (S)ociopath) and 13 Republicans, with one more Republican abstaining.
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1172/vote_117_2_00176.htm
Man Trump should just have put in Ron Paul...Peter Schiff...hell anyone without Keynsian drugs in the blood. The Fed just needs to be shut down once and for all. It really isn't needed and killing it would but a quick stop to big govt running up deficits.
As old Andy Jackson said on his death bed.."I killed the bank"...
Another failure of Trump
Yeah I blame Trump for the Fed too.
Another TDS-addled pile of shit.
For some reason, when economists get promoted into positions of authority, they believe that they have some sort of preternatural insight that allows them and their acolytes to ignore the fundamentals taught in college Econ 101.
This is a bit like a physicist who, upon being promoted to a full professorship, tells folks that they can safely ignore quantum mechanics, relativity, conservation of energy because in their highly educated opinion, these things don't matter any more.
The nation might do well to consider draining the Fed Swamp and starting anew.
What is taught in Econ 101 is that white people are racist oppressors and that government control of the entire country is the only acceptable cure.
My preferred solution is to cut legislative staff to one per member, and go to a part time legislature; February and March in an unheated barn in Topeka Kansas, and July and August in an un-airconditioned Quonset hut in Big Bend Texas.
You have great ideas.
And no salaries or benefits. Public service means public service.
That's a good plan, but I would do winters in International Falls. They must be present for the entire session to pass anything.
have a barn outside Marysville I can volunteer its use.
I think the important question is: Does it have a woodchipper behind it?
always time to line one up.
Cut federal spending; rent as needed.
Just make elected and appointed officials hire their own staff, out of their own salary. US Presidents used to do this.
"My preferred solution is to cut legislative staff to one per member, and go to a part time legislature;"
On the contrary, I think this is actually a big problem right now. Laws are being written by lobbyists because congress doesn't have staffing in proportion to their legal portfolio. You think Ted Fucking Cruz or Nancy Pelosi has EVER sat down to write a law? No, they hand it to their staff who have 40 other things to do, and just open up the emailed legislation handed over by their buddy at the nearby think tank.
The point here is that the answer is to drastically reduce the power and scope of government.
Reduce salaries? All that means is people will be even more beholden to shady special interests. Grow or reduce staffers? That won't solve anything. So long as the government represents a growing proportion of our lives, people will increasingly see it as the place they go for redress and for sweet sweet graft.
Lobbyists write legislation in the states because legislators have term limits and are very gullible and inexperienced.
Not Alaska?
I like the cut of your jib.
The nation might do well to consider draining the Fed Swamp and starting anew.
Check out Racist McKKKpants over here.
Bernanke and Greenspan are prime examples. volker is the only one I can think of in my lifetime who sort of kept his intelligence...and he still loved fiat currency. In the end this all started in 1971 didn't it?
Well actually 1913 but 1971 was the deathblow. But Watergate was so much more important nobody noticed.
I'm well passed the 'draining' desire and have moved on to 'cleanse with fire' demand.
Not only is there not any accountability for these assholes, their failures are never an indictment of the Government as Savior hypothesis, and always the fault of those meddling kids (GOP) or in the worst case, not having the right processes in place.
If you really want a larf, watch Obama on his Netflix documentary, "The G Word". Government is great. Government is perfect. Everything good happens because government, and when things don't happen well it is because evil republicans didn't government good enough. Not an ounce of contrition about how that great Obama G murderdroned wedding parties, turned Syria and Libya into smoking anarchy all while building the apparatus to spy on rival politicians.
And he will likely win an emmy for his lies.
The Emmy will look good next to the Peace Prize.
you're 100% correct, but not only do the left want & love government they want federal government only. they want a huge federal government with little or no control at the state & local level. for the left if washington isn't controlling something then it should. they hate federalism.
They love all government.
The reason for Federal is because they think they can get it all done in one place. But the instant something is not to their liking in DC, they're totally all about states' rights. We even had secessionists here when Trump got elected.
Yep, they're only stoked about federal control because they control the federal government. As soon as there's a GOP president, they will be back to 'sanctuary cities' and #RESIST.
I'm sure that documentary asked Obama some hard-hitting questions about Edward Snowden.
"Not only is there not any accountability for these assholes, their failures are never an indictment of the Government as Savior hypothesis, and always the fault of those meddling kids (GOP) or in the worst case, not having the right processes in place."
See also: "Fauci"
Pfizer's pocket mouse failed up for 4 decades, and as far as I can tell has no real successes of his own.
He managed to destroy the US economy. You may call that a failure but to him that's a success
80-19
Bipartisan! How about that!
It will be good when you are dead.
"misjudged"? Bullshit. He lied through his teeth.
The only purpose of the Fed is to rob us by inflating the currency. All other ostensible functions are lies. The Fed's existence is unconstitutional, and fiat currency is clearly forbidden by the gold and silver clause.
-jcr
fiat currency is clearly forbidden by the gold and silver clause
Probably the most decent argument in favor of crypto that I've never heard anybody make. Not that nobody's ever said crypto is non-/anti-fiat, but I've never heard anyone say cryptocurrency is Constitutionally-protected as a currency. Not that it isn't, just that fanbois always tout how it will save us from fiat rather than pointing out that it doesn't matter if it will save us or not, it's legal. An argument that more broadly defends liberty rather than the usual "Bitcoin will save us all from tyranny and oppressive surveillance once everything everybody does is recorded on the blockchain."
Crypto is not fiat currency, because nobody has any power to require you to accept it. Only governments make fiat currencies.
-jcr
^^WELL SAID!!!!
And who wrote The Federal Reserve Act???
That's right; Democrats.
My remark about the author of this column knowing fuck-all about judgement on the Fed Board of Governors seems to have gotten swallowed.
The Fed is doing a pretty damn good job. The blame for the economic shitshow lies over on Capitol Hill and Pennsylvania Ave.
Jesus, everybody's a fucking expert.
No interest loans to banks didn’t have any effect?
No-interest loans have an effect. But one of the other effects the Fed seeks is non-collapse of the banking system, and when long rates-- over which no one has any control in anything less than a ten-year timeframe-- are hovering around 2%, then short rates close to zero may make perfect sense. Certainly if long rates are in the twos, holding short rates at 5% would just be sticking your thumb in the eye of the whole economy.
Long term inflation expectations, right up until and into the Covid panic, were in the <2% range. It was the legislature's hell-bent intention to spend as many trillions as possible that jacked inflation expectations, and it was the lockdown orders of every government toady worldwide that created the huge asset dislocations that helped stoke inflation for real.
Powell is not blameless, but good God. If you're starting by blaming him you might as well have picked the dog catcher, because you missed at least a thousand other political hacks who performed way, WAY worse than he did.
yeah, I think Powell is trying to make the best of a bad situation. maybe someone else could have done better, but they also could have done much worse.
The Fed hasn't prevented the collapse of the banking system. The banking system collapsed. It died. And rather than watch banks fail, get unwound and capital redistributed, the Fed pumped 2 Trillion into the economy back in 09, largely by buying up securities. And then they did it again during covidgeddon, increasing its balance sheet by another 4 Trillion.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm
The fed underwent QE to try and save the system- to prop up banks and other major institutions just long enough to absorb the shock of the Financiappocalypse.
But here is the problem: They didn't absorb the shock. They died just as surely as the apocryphal character trapped beneath a truck. Move the truck and they bleed out in seconds. You can keep them comfortable now, but they are 100% ex-banks. Take a look at that graph and you can see that only once did they try tapering off the assets towards 2018. The rest of the time they kept buying and buying.
That balance sheet is the damage that the Fed has put off. In 2009 it was $2 Trillion worth of damage. But now it is $8 Trillion. That's dollars that they injected into the system and which flailing banks, investment houses, tech companies, and Fortune 500 companies wouldn't have been able to access to prop up failing or inefficient lines of business.
Those businesses didn't get any more efficient while sitting on life support. QE didn't give them time to shore up their business- it just made their impact larger. They gave everyone raises, and embarked on vanity projects that have shitty ROI, and sank other investments that will only pay off if money continues to be free. Pull that $8 Trillion back out of the system, and they will have to unwind all that nonsense.
And of course, Free Market Capitalism will be to blame.
Wasn't QE essentially a giant asset swap? The Fed did over pay for mortgage backed securities, especially in the first couple of rounds of QE - and that propped up the banking system. Getting back to the asset swap, the Fed bought trillions of dollars of Treasury and mortgage back securities from the private sector and "printed" (electronically) money to pay for it. The private sector basically ended up with no net new financial assets - but the composition of the assets changed.
The Fed caused rampant inflation under Obama and especially Trump. The stock market's PE ratio is completely out of whack and real estate is insanely expensive and has inflated at an absurd rate.
These are direct consequences of the Fed's very poor quantitative easing policies, where they just dumped huge amounts of money into the economy at the top.
This resulted in massive inflation in capital goods - stocks and real estate - along with things like massive stock buybacks and whatnot, along with companies accumulating huge cash stockpiles and going on merger frenzies.
Consumer inflation was triggered when people refused to go to work, resulting in companies having to hike wages to attract people to come back. They tapped into those huge cash stockpiles and wages went way up - but productivity didn't.
The inflation that had flooded the capital markets was now flooding into consumer markets, and it fuelled the demand for higher wages.
All of this was on top of Trump's tax cut giveaway, which further flooded the market with money, and then the money being handed out to consumers.
The fed should have stopped the QE under Trump and raised rates, but Trump threw a hissy fit and the fed relented.
Now it is going to be much worse and we need either massive wage increases (and inflation) or for capital good markets to lose a good 30% of their overinflated value.
The core problem is that democrat governors shut down their state’s economies for extended periods. So as usual, the core problem is the democrats.
The solution is to remove all democrats and shut down their party.
Uhm - The Fed can't be blamed for actions of Congress, the Trump administration, or the Biden administration. Fiscal policy matters too. Don't tell me the Fed lent the federal government the money for all that COVID relief money pumped in the economy by the Trump and Biden administrations. That's not how our monetary system works. Also - don't tell me all that QE money the Fed "printed" is fueling inflation. Some of it is - but much of it, especially in the early rounds of QE -is stuck in the reserve system, which is closed. Banks only lend those reserves to other banks.
QE was mostly a giant asset swap. This is not to say the Fed is blameless - I'm just not in the camp that believes the Fed is mostly at fault. Is it the Fed's fault that oil and gas is so expensive now? Tell me how raising interest rates is going to fix that. How about food costs? Are eating more now? Heck no. Again - tell me how raising interest rates is going to lower my grocery bills. The Fed has certainly helped cause inflation in certain asset categories - like the stock market and housing. I just am skeptical about the notion of "cooling off" an economy that is "too hot". Too much growth? Bulls**t. Politicians around the globe decided to murder their economies when the pandemic started - not central bankers. The distortions and disruptions politicians caused have not fully abated - and the Fed cannot do much to fix the damage done by politicians.
The Fed is political as fuck, all woke and shit, and has been cheerleading all this spending, saying it was good, not harmful. The Fed deserves a shitload of blame for their part.
Is it the gun manufacturer's fault that the shooter went on a spree?
The blame for too much spending lies with the President, and Congress. Full stop.
When someone eggs on the shooter, the egger-on deserves blame too. The fed egged on the politicians and deserves blame too.
Pick a better analogy next time. Don't just yank gun hate out yer arse.
"The blame for too much spending lies with the President, and Congress. Full stop."
How is Congress responsible for Quantitive Easing?
Executions all around!
Amen.
Maybe it's just me, but energy prices are what is driving inflation. It affects all sectors including wages. The Fed can't affect them be they can sure as hell come out and say it. Yes, some of it is Puting, but not the first 75%. And putting your boot on the neck of the oil compaies is clearly going to get you less of what they produce. They don't care as they'll make money no matter what, But showing them that government isn't going to change the rules in the middle of the game (Keystone pipeline), will make them comfortable enough to invest millions and billions in production, which takes years to come to fruition. The Fed knows this but said nothing. They are cooling of an economy which was already cooling off. Now were headed stright down to a serious recession.
It's not just you; I certainly agree. Diesel fuel at $5.50 a gallon drives up the cost of everything tangible.
energy prices are what is driving inflation
No. Inflation is a policy, it's dilution of the currency, and the general price level will rise because of it.
Fuel prices are due to Biden's idiotic anti-production policy, not inflation.
-jcr
IOWs, fuel prices are a result, not a cause of inflation.
>>approved this past week by the Senate, 80–19
to the top of the (R) is (D) is (R) is (D) pile for you.
Even if Keynes were right, my understanding is that all the fixit spending was supposed to be timely, targeted, and temporary. It never has been,
Shovel ready!
Are we burying politicians alive? I have a shovel...
have a barn in Marysville ...
And you forget 'debts taxed back to zero'.
Now THIS is a problem. Not only it never has been, but no conscious American ever believed it was to be. We know our politicians better than that.
We can't try austerity now, people are hurting.
And when times are good, we can't try austerity, because there's crumbling infrastructure to rebuild and big social problems we can finally afford to solve.
It was supposed to be timely, targeted, and temporary. But he also explained - In the long run, we are all dead.
You think he's bad? You should see the other guy.
It wasn't Powell who overspent to the tune of 30 billion dollars -- that was Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden. Powell kept the QE printing presses going too long, and started hiking rates too late, but people would have been complaining more if he had taken some preemptive shots at inflation and ended the stock market/real estate party last year. At least now people realize severe action to stop inflation is needed.
Good luck with that soft landing though.
Remember 1980? Good times, good times.
Sorry, 30 trillion dollars
"I know the usual arguments for ignoring the Fed's spectacular errors, even at a time when inflation is such an issue. Most common are that other candidates would be even worse or that we need continuity. Maybe."
More likely they couldn't find anyone else willing to take the job.
Obviously the solution is to replace the Fed Chair with a rate-adjusting algorithm.
I could take the job
Day 1:
Walk in power down the money printer
Day 2:
Say no Blackrock and vanguard your not too big to fail
Day 3:
Bullet to the back of your head. Assassin is never caught.
Day 4:
New boss! Money printer goes back to brrrrrrr
The last pesident that tried to do the things he campaigned on was Trump. Biden, the uniter and moderate candidate, turned into a radical left winger with no intention of working across the aisle. I hear him blame everything on Putin, trump, anyone but himself. How do you get off blaming the Republicans for all the problems when you have majorities in the House, and Senate and you have the White House? Biden signed twice as many executive orders that trump and Obama combined. An powell, if he was any kind of economist, would be tellin g Bioden that the cost of energy is the main driver of inflation. When he put the boot of the government on the oil companies cause all of this. Everyone knows it. Throw in the border disaster, the horrible Afghanistan withdrawal, and I'm seeing either incompetence or an outright liar. Leaving Powell in keeps the track record of hiring incompetents. You can raise the interest rates if you don't have energy prices almost doubling because of regulations you put on them because the lefties want their green new deal. Doesn't take a genius to see that. See you at the midterms.
Being incompetent is normal for that position.
But Powell at least isn't a batshit insane racist, like the other candidates Biden was considering.
I mean, you guys are as dumb as a box of rocks but you're still paid to write drivel so why not him?
There was nothing Keynesian about the policies that got us into this mess. Keynes advocated for deficit spending to stimulate sluggish demand. We didn't need that, yet we opened the spigot anyway. Pretty simple Keynesian arithmetic predicted inflation.
The Fed exists for two purposes. To protect it's member banks and to allow the federal government to spend more than it takes in. Seems Powell has kept that going so...
"by the end of 2020, more goods were getting through than before the pandemic. Also, in 2021, most countries barely suffered any inflation, which is incompatible with the theory that inflation is caused by global supply-chain disruptions."
So we're just straight up lying now?
Watch your favorite news channels, and up to date with the world's current affairs.
All you need to purchase through: http://mediatvbox.com
Moreover, get 30% discount on bank transfer.
Either Powell is a total idiot or scheming little small hat wearing weasel .
Of course the politicians should some of the blame. They shut down their states with lock down orders, sending millions out of work and destroying who knows how many small businesses. Then the CDC, with NO Constitutional authority, ordered a moratorium on rent. Then Washington decided to order up the PPP, then billions were stolen from that, then, then, then.
Thirty trillion in debt and the Fed a part of the small hat tribe, allows all this to happen becauase they won't say no to the politicians, most of whom have the intelligence of a potato.
Of course the idiots in congress will vote to reconfirm Powell...if they know what's good for 'em.
It's all a big club and you ain't in it.
The whole thing is a charade.Powell was going to get his second term whether congress or the idiot in the White House voted for it or not.
The entire charade marched in front of the American people as some sort of vetting and election process is just that: a charade. A hoax. A cruel joke on America and the small hat tribe is getting away with it.
As for those in congress who voted to reaffirm Powell, may you all choke on your own tongues and stroke out. May you all come down with the monkey pox.
Don't care one way or another on Powell but he can't predict that the Saudis and Hacksaw Salman would refuse to increase oil quotas as they usually do in a crisis. With "allies" like Salman who needs enemies?
We must must MUST reach an agreement with Venezuela to ramp up their output.
Powell didn't misjudge inflation he lied to cover up Biden's ineptness. That makes him the perfect candidate for Fed Chair as far as the Biden handlers are concerned they know he will tell more lies to cover up for Biden's disastrous policies.