Joe Biden's Phony Fiscal Responsibility
Biden gloats over a historically astronomical budget deficit as if he's accomplished something significant. He hasn't.

The national debt is at an all-time high and this year's budget deficit is forecasted to be the third or fourth-largest in American history—but President Joe Biden claims these are signs that his administration is overseeing a period of fiscal austerity.
Really! Here are some words that actually tumbled out of the president's mouth at a press conference on Wednesday morning: "We're on track to cut the federal deficit by another $1.5 trillion by the end of this fiscal year. The biggest decline ever in a single year, ever, in American history."
"And the biggest decline on top of us having a $350 billion drop in the deficit last year, my first year as president," Biden continued. "The bottom line is that the deficit went up every year under my predecessor—before the pandemic and during the pandemic—and it's gone down both years since I've been here. Period. They're the facts."
Those facts, however, exclude a few key details. Like the fact that Biden took office the year after the budget deficit hit previously unimaginable highs due to a completely unprecedented spending binge triggered by a once-in-a-generation public health disaster.
The annual budget deficit—the gap between how much the government collects in tax revenue and how much it spends—jumped from about $900 billion in 2019 to more than $3.1 trillion 2020, then declined to about $2.8 trillion last year. The White House now expects the deficit for the current fiscal year, which ends in September, to weigh in at about $1.3 trillion.
Yes, relative to last year, that means the deficit will decline by about $1.5 trillion this year. And if you can't remember anything that happened before 2020, then I guess that might seem like an accomplishment.
Relative to almost any other year in American history, however, this is about the exact opposite of fiscal responsibility. Outside of the two years of the pandemic, the largest deficit in American history was a little over $1.4 trillion in 2009. That year will likely remain ahead of 2022 (and if you adjust for inflation, it's unlikely we'll approach that level again in the too-near future).
That means Biden is bragging about presiding over what's likely to wind up as the fourth-largest deficit in history. This is what passes for fiscal responsibility in Washington, D.C., these days.

In fact, if you look at the actual budgetary baselines published by the Congressional Budget Office—that is, the ongoing amount of annual federal spending absent any emergency stimulus bills like the ones passed on several occasions during the height of the pandemic—Biden has overseen a noticeable increase in the deficit above the pre-pandemic baseline. According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a fiscal watchdog group that advocates for lower deficits, Biden's policies have added about $2.5 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years.
"Taking credit for a deficit drop that is largely the result of expiring stimulus and higher inflation makes little sense," reads a statement from Maya MacGuineas, the committee's president. MacGuineas praises Biden for even talking about fiscal responsibility—something that few policymakers do these days—but points out that several of the administration's biggest policy plans are not paid for and that Biden has not put forward a plan to deal with the pending fiscal insolvency of entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare.
"It is wonderful to have a President in the White House who acknowledges the importance of fiscal responsibility," MacGuineas says, "now we need more policy choices to back that up."
However, Biden isn't talking about deficit reduction as something his administration is seeking to accomplish—he's talking about it as a done deal. He's trying to take credit for two years of falling deficits as a way to justify more spending and bigger deficits in the years to come. The budget he presented to Congress earlier this year envisions growing deficits despite calling for big tax increases on the wealthy—the annual deficits will remain above pre-pandemic levels for the rest of the next decade and will hit $1.8 trillion by 2032. And that doesn't even include the cost of several big-ticket items, like Biden's Build Back Better plan, which is relegated to a footnote in the budget even though it would cost trillions of dollars.
Yes, it's a big deal for a president to call a press conference to talk about the federal budget. More talk about fiscal issues in Washington is welcome. Now we just need a president who will do so without spreading misinformation.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Biden should be thankful Build Back Better got derailed, since that would have wiped out his deficit reduction claim.
He'd have still claimed it.
I mean, he had the balls to say, unashamedly, that it wouldn't cost anything. Actual reality doesn't enter into most politicians' pronouncements.
And he had to use the pandemic baseline to even claim it just like with TARP under Obama, the dems want to turn one time spending into the new budget baseline.
Worked the first time.....
Fuck Joe Biden
Fuck Joe Biden
I guess I can't blame a motherfucker for trying.
Anyone remember when a $1 trillion deficit was the height of fiscal irresponsibility? Anyone? Sigh.
I don't. But it's mostly because I drink to forget.
And the two things I drink to forget are the fiscal irresponsibility of our nation, and Carmelita...
Carmelita
Were you all strung out on heroin, on the outskirts of town?
That's probably for the best.
I remember having to explain to my left leaning colleague the difference between deficit and debt because he was claiming BO reduced debt.
"If you go out for lunch on Monday with only $10 in your pocket but lunch costs $20, so you borrow $10 from a coworker: your deficit Monday, and your debt Tuesday morning is $10. Tuesday you go out for lunch again with only $10, but this time you only spend $18, borrowing the $8 you need. You've reduced your deficit! Wednesday, you again have only $10 and borrow $5 for your $15 dollar lunch. You've further reduced your deficit. Thursday your lunch only costs $12, and Friday you find a deal for an $11 dollar lunch. Hooray, now you've reduced your deficit to just $1! You go out and have a big weekend to celebrate. Monday morning the coworker you borrowed from all last week says he's cutting you off until you pay him the $26 you owe him back. But you reduced the deficit, how could your debt be so much?"
This is why leftists/Ds/bureaucrats love to talk about the deficit to deflect from the debt they've driven higher and higher.
My colleague's mind was blown.
And the better scenario for government is spending more on lunch as the week progresses, but bringing slightly more money with you each day. Not enough to pay for your own lunch, but just enough to borrow slightly less than the day before.
And further, you don't just borrow $10 for lunch Monday- you borrow $50 and brag about only borrowing $45 Tuesday.
But borrowing less isn't even a goal. If it happens by chance (such as it did for Biden) the president will take credit. And if it doesn't, they just stay quiet about it and no one asks.
And worse, as you pointed out with your co-worker, most Americans think this means they reduced the debt.
The only thing I disagree with you about is the implication that this is the strictly a problem of the Democrats. Republicans used pay lip service to the deficit and do nothing about it. Now they just do nothing.
*used to pay*
Bards, Please also recall that with Clintons “surplus budget” the debt went up. Government accounting would never pass GAAP standards.
I remember a 10 trillion dollar national debt like it was barely 14 years ago. And now it's triple that.
I remember then-candidate Obama attacking out-of-control spending referring to the Bank of China credit card.
The video tied to this article has Biden claiming that reducing the deficit will ease inflation - which is odd, because he also says federal spending does not impact inflation. Odd.
It’s just too bad your precious democrats don’t have full control. Then there wouldn’t be anymore deficits.
Now we just need a president who will do so without spreading misinformation.
If only there were an authoritarian government agency to investigate such misinformation...
IMPEACH!
Calling it misinformation is disinformation. It is disinformation for your information.
Calling a tax on people with a hundred million dollars a billionaire's tax is disinformation. Where do I report it?
DHS regrets to inform you that declaring a tax on millionaires is not a tax on billionaires is disinformation. Agents will be by shortly to administer corrective actions. Have a good day!
There is no political appetite in this country for a balanced budget (except among a relative handful of libertarians). The politicians know it and will vote accordingly.
Not even the libertarians support it. Rand Paul has voted to plenty of un-paid-for tax cuts.
Because the tax cuts don't actually reduce government revenues. The deficit is entirely from increased spending.
Rand Paul is no libertarian.
Polling suggests that a balanced budget amendment has fairly wide support. But I wonder how many people understand that the vast majority of the federal budget is non-discretionary spending on welfare and social security?
Phony Joe wants to control the truth with his disinformation board. Boy, will Reason get in trouble for calling Joe phony! Remember the DHS, a law enforcement agency will be in charge or the phony Disinformation Board.
Christ, what an asshole.
Go easy on him. He's young, gullible, and writes what he's paid to write.
I believe Obama dubbed that budget, "A New Era of Responsibility."
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1605207292/reasonmagazinea-20/
As a wise man once said, when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
Don't just dig more slowly.
We can't try austerity now, people are hurting, I think the argument goes from Nobel Prize winning economists.
And we can't try austerity when times are good either, because the money is flowing in. Then it's time to invest in the future of America.
Populism as policy rather than political tactic.
So they spent 4 trillion dollars during the pandemic to break the supply chain, close schools and drive millions into depression? I could have done all that for half the price!
We couldn't actually force people to experience pain from the government dictates, otherwise they may have resisted them for strongly than they did. Geesh, don't you even government?
Remember circus and bread. It worked for the Romans (until it didn't), so it's the go to play ever since by governments the world over.
Still waiting on the mea culpa from the orange man bad edititors at reason.
Guess what everyone- our strategic oil reserves are tapped. This administration are innumerate intellectually retarded climate zealots. This is bad BTW.
Don't worry, there's absolutely no possibility that we'd get involved in any 'kinetic' military action while Biden's in office... Russia will never take exception to our ever-increasing shipments of weapons to Ukraine, and China would never make a move on Taiwan.
All Good, No Joke.
Truly, hopefully most legal voters will appreciate that we NEED actual functional, responsible LEADERS to be elected to government offices - NOT POLITICIANS! Yeah, dream on... The demise of "journalism" in our MSM has made the electioneering process little more than a spectacle of "screaming heads" (the successor to "talking heads"). The quest for media share impact looks like a verbal version of "wrassling". The current verbal storm over Roe vs Wade illustrates well the lack of sane responsible discourse.
"a once-in-a-generation GOVERNANCE disaster".
FIFY
I’ve been reading Reason since college in the 70’s. It’s now part of my daily news consumption routine but this is my first comment. You will add more punch to your work and bring reason to public affairs by providing more comparative analysis and context. For instance the economy, debt and deficits do not begin and end with each election cycle; each administration has an effect on them that carries over and must be dealt with by who follows. Another example is to provide a cost benefit analysis of the spending by two presidents to manage the USA’s pandemic response. Do not limit the critique to their spending impact on the deficit. Trade offs are embedded in policy decisions and it would help readers to know what was gained as well as lost. To advance the values of individual freedom and choice, limiting government and expanding market friendly policies means providing information that will persuade others. Reason/rationality is a key element of persuasion because it uses logic to draw conclusions from information with the aim of seeking truth regardless of where it takes us.
Federal deficits equal private sector surpluses, to the penny.
Federal deficits are net annual investments in economic growth by the federal govt. The economy cannot grow without money growth; insufficient money growth results in recessions, and federal surpluses result in depressions.
Federal “debt” is the total of government investments, which equals, by law, the total of deposits into T-security accounts. The federal government pays off those T-security accounts by returning the money to the account holders, and not with tax dollars. Thus, no one is liable today or in the future for paying off the “debt.”
Inflation is caused by shortages of key goods and services, not by “excessive” federal deficit spending
Yall need to start calling this mafia greaseball slime fgt by his real name, jHoe obiden.
This is very similar to this news https://reason.com/video/2022/04/01/biden-is-clueless-about-inflation/
"Wrong within normal parameters."
Yep. Where is the money coming from for the new DOJ “Office of Environmental Justice’ a century of environmental wrong redress for marginalized peoples. The Democrats are not going this spiral. The doubling down on the spiral is astonishing.
Do you mean to say Boehm is Biden’s cockholster?
Hold your nose and vote for a new normal!
Anyone who ever used the term new normal unironically should be tarred, feathered and driven out of town on a rail.