A Federal Jury Delivers a Rebuke of FBI Entrapment
The agency’s tactics doomed the prosecution of defendants who allegedly planned to kidnap Michigan's governor.

"Through confidential sources, undercover agents, and clandestine recordings," the Justice Department announced in October 2020, "law enforcement learned particular individuals were planning to kidnap" Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and "acting in furtherance of that plan." But it turned out those individuals included the government's "confidential sources," who pushed the half-baked scheme and orchestrated acts "in furtherance of that plan" even when the defendants resisted it.
The appearance of entrapment, coupled with the difficulty of distinguishing between fantasy and criminal conspiracy, explains the embarrassing outcome of a federal trial that ended last week, when jurors acquitted two alleged conspirators and failed to reach verdicts for the other two. It was a well-deserved rebuke of investigative methods that crossed the line between prevention and invention.
Two of the six original defendants, Ty Garbin and Kaleb Franks, pleaded guilty and testified for the prosecution, saying they willingly participated in the kidnapping plot. But the record compiled by the government shows FBI agents and their informants were determined to advance a narrative that would justify their efforts.
The jurors clearly were troubled by that evidence. They acquitted two of the remaining defendants, Daniel Harris and Brandon Caserta, of conspiring to kidnap Whitmer, and they could not agree on the charges against the other two, Adam Fox and Barry Croft.
Prosecutors said the defendants, whom they described as members of right-wing militias, were so enraged by Whitmer's heavy-handed COVID-19 control measures that they resolved to kidnap her. But it was doubtful that they had the ability to mount such an operation and unclear what the upshot was supposed to be.
In a September 2020 text message to Dan Chappel, a key FBI informant who was paid more than $50,000 for his work, Special Agent Jayson Chambers said, "Mission is to kill the governor specifically." But Garbin testified that there was talk of stranding Whitmer in Lake Michigan on a boat without a motor, which would somehow prevent Joe Biden from winning the presidential election.
The government portrayed Fox, who was commonly dismissed as an indecisive, incompetent, and unserious stoner, as the ringleader. Yet Fox repeatedly talked about abandoning or indefinitely delaying the kidnapping scheme, and even when he discussed the logistics, it was clear he had no realistic plan: He imagined using boats and a helicopter, for instance, even though he had access to neither.
Several elements of the plot described by the Justice Department seemed to be products of government instigation. During a June 2020 meeting highlighted by the FBI, for example, it was an informant who argued that kidnapping was necessary.
When Fox reported that militia members could not agree on a plan to kidnap Whitmer or suggested that the idea should be put "on the back burner," Chappel continued to promote the scheme. He and the other informants also suggested alternative crimes, such as firing rounds into Whitmer's vacation cottage and destroying her boat.
The informants encouraged, coordinated, assisted, or funded various acts that the government cited as evidence of a conspiracy, including the use of encrypted communications, a nighttime drive to Whitmer's cottage that went awry because the FBI had the wrong address, and several "field training exercises" (FTXs). Although the FBI suggested that abbreviation was familiar to the defendants, Caserta had to ask Chappel what it meant.
The FBI said its informants operated independently, unaware of each other's identities. But audio recordings show they colluded to produce the evidence the FBI wanted. "I am not going to induce any fucking illegal activity that we don't have to," one declared.
These FBI tactics are familiar from earlier investigations. In many terrorism cases, the agency likewise used informants to implicate suspects in crimes they otherwise might not have had the inclination or wherewithal to commit.
"We have a saying in my office," Special Agent Henrik Impola told a confidential informant after the kidnapping suspects were arrested. "Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story."
© Copyright 2022 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Now do the j6 entrapment
Exactly.
^This
Won't happen, they get only Obama appointed judges, not juries.
Even worse they will get DC juries, would have a better chance of getting a black man accused of raping a white woman off in 1960s Alabama.
there sure were a lot of totally inconspicuous guys going "hey we need to get into the capital! cmon lets go!" to people. Im sure it was completely organic insurrectionists, as CNN+ has told me.
Who is Ray Epps?
Indeed! Who is Ray Epps?
Stop trying to dox an FBI hero!
Trump incited and then abandoned them. You guys are such fucking losers.
All you do is lie.
I know it. Anyone with a different viewpoint is a liar. Because everyone has the same view as you, so when they say different it's because they're dirty liars who voted for Biden. MAGA 2024!
Ideas!
He told a lie, you stupid drunk.
Yep. Anyone who disagrees with you is a liar.
Trump didn’t incite anything you drunk liar.
Sarc doesn't know much. Like digression vs discretion. Or incitement being a legal term with specific conditions.
You call people liars for posting your past comments lol.
Trump told them to go forward in peace and made their voices heard.
If that is incitement, then every political speech in recorded history is.
He is lying.
Or we can just look at the speech Trump gave, and point out that he did not use inflammatory language, and that by the time trump finished speaking, people could not have traveled from the speech to the capital. Which then means others are either ignorant of the facts, or are as loose with the facts as the FBI infornmants.
It's quite possible to be disgusted by the treatment of the Jan 6 protesters/rioters without agreeing with them or what they did.
These are largely political prosecutions. And that's a big fucking deal whatever your politics (or should be).
Zeb almost criticized Reason!
They are kind enough to let this comment section continue as it is; I like to keep my criticisms reasonably polite.
And people like Maxine Waters, Pelosi, AOC, some of whom actually traveled to Wisconsin to incite people to violence and rioting, were either ignored by the media or was downplayed.
The lot of them should have been arrested and charged accordingly.
If there isn't a federal law against traveling across state lines to incite rioting and violence, there should be.
A few years ago some dems were saying no civility until dems are elected.
They don't want civility if they are not in charge and they want to blame someone else for it.
Cite?
You demonstrate that you are the loser.
Nah, the Jan 6th people are too gullible. Apparently Antifa and FBI agents enticed them into the building, and got them to assault Capitol Police officers, while the Antifa and FBI agents melted away.
Suckers! No one ever accused a Trumplican of being smart.
"...No one ever accused a Trumplican of being smart."
Much smarter than TDS-addled piles of shit.
Thus bleats the sheep.
Funny you say that. There is also evidence of the FBI involvement concerning Jan 6. The committee 'investigation' is a farce. This is why no citizen should ever trust its government. The covid lockdowns should be a warning that the fools we elects can over reach if given too much power.
The two suckers who pled guilty must really be kicking themselves. Even with the testimony of guilty co-conspirators the jury couldn't convict a single person. And I've heard that this judge wasn't exactly generous to the defense, either.
What was the composition of this "militia" anyway? 8 Feds and 6 dupes, and 2-3 of the dupes were literally homeless?
At least 12 feds/CIs. 6 dupes.
My prior knowledge allowed me to project that half of the "white supremacists" from the Gov. Witmer kidnap plot would be FBI agents or CIs (paid informants). I just wasn't clever enough to project that the Proud Boys and all the "white" groups, loaded with FBI agents and informants, could be led to do something like January 6.
I posted the comment above 10 months ago.
"Wasn't exactly generous" is an understatement. Somewhere around 80-90% of the defense was excluded, including simple things like playing additional film before and after the prosecution's video clips.
They couldn't even win a rigged game.
That's what's sad and also applies to J6. These trials should all be thrown out. You see all the video or if its really needs excluded we see none of the video.
The judge is supposed to decide what is relevant and what isn't. The question for the jury is "Are these people guilty of what they are charged with". Not "are they good people deep down inside" nor "did they have some questions before they did what they did?" The idea is to keep the jury emotion out.
If the judge left out a piece that was relevant, then it is grounds for appeal.
Which is why its important to get the judge on record ruling on a motion. If you don't bring it up at trial, you rarely can use the argument on appeal.
Percentages are irrelevant.
What makes you think the judge isn't mistaken?
ATM...I believe they are in the process of withdrawing their guilty pleas. Stay tuned.
Nice!
It's unlikely they can withdraw those pleas. To get a plea bargain, generally you have to "allocute", that is, testify under oath that you did the crime. Now you claim you were lying???
Welcome to 2020. Any plans to catch up?
Who doesn’t want freedom and democracy brought to their shores?
People have to find their own freedom and democracy. It cannot be brought to them.
Ha ha they had a bunch of agents badgering some citizens to do something stupid. Fake kidnapping. Whitemer knew. Her vacation house was outfitted with surveillance cameras by the FBI.
And its no biggee, OOPS!
Now lets do J6
We are already doing Jan. 6.
Clingers getting put in cages. Lots of whimpering by the defendants.
Congress unlocking insurrectionists' phones and preparing to reveal how a bunch of pathetic misfits got into the Capitol.
See you would not have the guts to step into an interview room, tell the guard to step out and show them that post to their face. A Grandma mee-maw would absolutely kick your ass.
Ah yes, the Internet tough guy. Trumptard.
Thanks, TDAS-addled pile of shit!
""Clingers getting put in cages."'
Along with the children?
You mean separated from their children.
Every J6 arrest literally rips a family apart.
Enjoy the fruits of communism.
> preparing to reveal how a bunch of pathetic misfits got into the Capitol
Well, according to the judge when he let the one go, apparently the big reveal is going to be "the guards waved them in".
Well done, Punky! You must be so proud.
Surprised Reason was allowed to publish this. But we'll see if they are now allowed to write about the J6 defendants
I know it. Reason has been completely silent on J6. Not a single article about it. Very telling. Right?
Not even Volokh who has some good subjects but a whole lot of duds
They could have linked to Volkh, but didn't.
https://reason.com/volokh/2022/04/08/court-removes-no-weapons-probation-condition-for-woman-convicted-of-jan-6-capitol-trespass/
That doesn't exist.
Neither does this one where they totally ignored that they people were let into the Capital.
https://reason.com/2022/04/07/january-6-defendant-who-says-he-thought-he-was-allowed-in-capitol-beats-charges/
So shameful. This magazine sucks with its one-sided reporting and total lack of J6 coverage.
Agree
I missed the ENB article but you'd think Volokh would be discussing the violation of civil rights of the defendants. But no we get obscure things form SCOTUS history.
But follow Julie Kelly at American Greatness for good J6 coverage.
whoosh
Is that wet-brain wit?
It’s the sound of sarc’s ass the morning after a case of Bud.
Yes. They passively wrote on the one case the judge decided while ignoring all the civil abuses for the other 700 arrested. They have zero articles on 52 month plea agreements for non violent acts. They have zero articles on 15 months of solitary confinement. They have zero articles on 8 months of no pre trial action. They have zero articles on treatments in D.C. jails
Your get on them just shows you are a leftist who ignores 99% of the bad as long as you can say you pointed to 1%.
It is pathetic.
We call this the jeff/mike/shrike/sarc method of "im not a leftist" posting. 99% of posts are pro dem anti republic but you throw in the occasional "i don't agree with biden either" and declare yourselves unbiased. Yet anyone who supported the Trump tax cuts is a full on Trump cultist.
The "Treatments in Jail" What? They can't stream Netflix?
Or are you talking about the water boarding and rubber hoses to try to get them to flip on each other?
Federal prison system, on average, only bonds out about 10% of the people in there. The other 90% are typically immigration (AKA flight risks).
So if you are going to pick a crime, do it some place that has a more agreeable pre-trial jail system.
Why are you defending the omission of information? Don't condone such dishonesty.
Now do Pelosi’s 1/6 kangaroo commission.
Forget the J6, they are morons.
The ones in serious trouble are the ones that assaulted/battered the Capitol Police. My understanding is they are looking at 5 years minimum. Presumably they have this on video.
The pure trespassing convictions are probation and maybe a small fine.
Question all the other "terrorists" that the FBI got convicted since 9/11. Pretty sure each and every one was an operation where an FBI agent sold them what they was weapons or explosives.
But I guess they were mostly non-white...
The FBI would have you believe these people were walking around asking to buy C4 to blow up whatever and an undercover agent just happened to be in the room. "Hey, over here, I got what you need".
More likely the FBI 'cultivated' someone that was disgruntle about some aspect of the government. "Hey, I know what you could do to make a statement...." "..... and I can get you the stuff you need" What? That part of the recording is missing?
"...Presumably they have this on video..."
Like the assault with the fire extinguisher?
TDS makes causes otherwise normal people to become steaming piles of shit.
It's amazing how dumb you have to play in order to take the positions you are taking.
One thing the left is amazing at now is just full on gaslighting while playing dumb in order to appear righteous and intelligent. It's this weird thing where you took the Daily Show schtick and thought that schtick was a sign of intellect.
So if the "planners" are mostly feds is it a crime or a stage show? Stage show was the ruling.
Notice how this and J6 target a certain demographic and probably folks with the same politics. These folks aren't Democrats.
I'm sure the same conversations happen in Russia about targeting folks that oppose the Communist party.
Wonder how many of the jurors were die-hard nullifiers, as in “I heard all the evidence and don’t think they did anything wrong, so good luck convincing me to vote guilty.” Remember the jury pool was made up solely of Michiganders, all of whom had to live through Whitmer’s reign of roping off aisles in the stores so you could buy groceries, but not a can of paint, and could be arrested for driving to your place in the U.P.
The jury should have been all Michiganders, that's how jury selection works, unless things are very different in Michigan. As for nullification, it is as likely that they heard the evidence and decided that the prosecution didn't have enough, or even a case.
Well it was a federal trial; I'm not sure what the rules are with federal district courts in terms of jury composition.
Or maybe it was just a Fed-napping and not a kidnapping
You would have been arrested for buying garden seeds.
Her little drunken sot, Atty. Gen. would see to it.
As a Michigander, she makes me ill to think we have to put up with her until the next election cycle.
"Evidence" is so 20th century, and probably racist. Good citizens should just accept that government agencies would not charge seditious criminals unless they definitely, totally committed some heinous assault on democracy.
The only ones committing assaults on "democracy" is the government itself.
I couldn't stop giggling for several days after reading about the verdicts. The FBI lost bigly on this one and hope it influences any trials for the mostly peaceful Jan.6 protestors .
Nothing pleases me more than to see the feds lose on a case like this. But let's not stop here. A campaign needs to begin to work on congress to fully defund the FBI. This agency has done nothing but entrap people for decades all the while never once admitting to the existence of the Mob. Hoover was a disgusting PO who blackmailed everyone in Washington and probably everywhere else.
There is no good reason for the continued existence of the FBI. It needs to be abolished and the former agents can do something that will actually benefit America, such as picking up trash alongside America's highways. The former FBI building can be used to house homeless veterans.
Unfortunately the J6 trials will have DC juries, would have a better chance of getting a black man accused of raping a white woman off in 1960s Alabama. You ever wonder why so many libs were moved to the area during Obama's reign? They have total control of the jury pool the only hope they have is getting a Trump or maybe a W judge and go for a bench trial unless some how they can get a change of venue.
I see it's the usual mix of pro-authoritarian-Trump-supporting posts criticizing Reason for not being libertarian enough and too left-wing...on a story calling out the entrapment of accused right-wing militiamen. I don't get it.
There are few if any perfect libertarians, but Reason is much closer than Trump.
OK. I'm ready for roasting.
*sprinkles rosemary and sage on Quicktown Brix*
Title 18 sections 241 and 242. All government employees involved should do 25+ years in prison and be fined at least $1M.
Abolish the FBI abolish all Police. Both are progressive socialist concepts.
American law enforcement is your elected sheriff. Volunteer. Carry. Train. Be ready should your sheriff call upon you.
Please explain on what grounds should the American people be forced to shell out money to maintain a federal agency that has not only worn out its welcome but has caused more damage and distrust ? Since the inception of this needless waste of tax dollars, it has relied upon extortion, blackmail and setting up countless numbers of Americans on false charges and entrapment.
The FBI has used every form of black mail and extortion against anyone who would dare question their operations.
The FBI is like a crooked sheriff, corrupt, greedy and self serving, one who cares little for the people he was elected to protect. Instead he uses his power and authority to do what ever he pleases.
There is no reason to continue the existence of this rotten to the core agency.
Wow. Substitute "police" for "FBI" and you have just recited the BLM manifesto.
And you would be mistaken:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-myth-of-systemic-police-racism-11591119883
Read it and repent.
Wow. Substitute sewage for a brain and you get con-fuse9.
Maybe the jurors just thought Whitmer had it coming.
The FBI has no credibility anymore.
This is a good thing.
The FBI had no credibility from the very beginning and it certainly lost what it might have had in the past.
J.Edgar Hoover was a malicious, power hungry gangster. Not only did he blackmail everyone in Washington but he himself was being blackmailed by Meyer Lansky.
This comparison between J6 and the MI 4 seems to be a matter of convenience without any fundamental similarities for The J6 apologists. Would the MI 4 have initiated their crime without guidance from the FBI? The jury found that two would not have and couldn't agree on the other two.
President Trump was not part of a law enforcement agency prodding people to commit a crime as to convict them later. Their can be no entrapment. This is simply a matter of cultists unable to find the wherewithal to break the spell. I understand all the prior false charges against Trump would leave one to completely distrust any charges against Trump. One look at the communications between Trump’s lawyers and Pence’s lawyers prior to J6 should clear up any doubt that Trump was ready to go full 3rd World. The Democrats will bring this to a full boil just before The November elections.
Of course, the D's are withholding evidence of Trump's crimes! Why didn't we all figure this out?!
One more TDS addled pile of shit telling us it's the tipping point.
To be clear, who are you calling a pile of shit from behind your keyboard? I don't want to see the Democrats in charge. I don't want them to win because they can use Trump's actions to paint ordinary, average Republicans as nitwits. Have you even seen the transcripts between Trump’s lawyers and Pence’s? Oh, but wait, that can all be explained, my bad. Nancy Pelosi was seen in the vicinity and had access to the transcripts and had Comey alter them in Hillary’s secret enclave. Anyone who has read those transcripts and doesn't find them repulsive, if not damning, is deluding themselves.
Please God, let the fever break.
Are you so stupid you have to ask, TDS-addled pile of shit?
Seems to me that several “government agents” need to end up looking through bars, from the inside. What, in addition, might be the possibilities of civil suits against government agents, and the agencies that employed them?
Federal Bureau of Invention
Context by way of a great NYT Mag article that details the evil ways of the Federal Bureau of Instigation. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/01/magazine/fbi-terrorism-terry-albury.html#commentsContainer
The premise of requiring a “constitutional oath of office” is that the “ends” never justify unconstitutional-means. The top duty of FBI officials, DOJ, NSA, DOD, DHS and CIA is to uphold the U.S. Constitution [a wartime governing charter].
America has an “indirect” loyalty oath. Police, military, intel officials, legislators, judges, governors and presidents swear supreme (and superseding) loyalty in their job authority to the “constitutional rule of law”. Local, state and federal laws are required to circumscribe the U.S. Constitution.
This supreme loyalty oath has been “the supreme law of land” since 1789 (predating the Bill of Rights) found under Article VI and Article II of the Constitution. Congress codified Article VI into federal statute under Title 5 US Code 3331. If you read federal law it applies to all government officials, including the military during wartime.
There are already “exigent circumstances” exceptions allowed in true emergency situations.
I knew from the very beginning that the story didn't add up. Who is going to kidnap and murder the governor over covid policies? It didn't pass the smell test.
Another DNC Machine Pre=Election Ruse exposed.