Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Movies

Morbius Is a Superhero Vampire Movie That Really Sucks

Jared Leto stars in a not-quite-Marvel film that inadvertently demonstrates the strengths of the MCU.

Peter Suderman | 4.1.2022 10:38 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
morbius-large-use | Sony Pictures
(Sony Pictures)

Morbius, the latest quasi-addition to the Marvel movie megafranchise, can't quite decide whether it's a modern vampire movie or a dark superhero flick. But if you have to choose, it's pretty clear that it leans toward the vampire genre, if only for the reason that, like all those fanged blood fiends, it really, really sucks. 

I say "quasi-addition," because Morbius exists in an intellectual property netherrealm, an awkward in-between zone in which it is neither a full-fledged Marvel movie nor its own entirely separate franchise.

Historically, Morbius is a Marvel Comics character—originally a Spider-Man nemesis who rode the wave of trippy, horror-shlock comics in the 1970s. But like Venom, who has already headlined a pair of solo films, the rights to the character are controlled by Sony through the studio's deal to produce Spider-Man movies. Complicating things further, however, the Spider-Man films are actually produced in conjunction with Marvel (which is owned by Disney), in a secondary deal that allows Marvel to incorporate Spider-Man into the broader Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). Thus, the movie ends with Morbius connecting with a character from one of the recent MCU Spider-Man films, in a multiverse event presaged by Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Got that?

Honestly, it doesn't really matter whether you do or don't. Somehow, all of this comic book movie deal-making lore makes much more sense than the movie itself. 

Like the two Venom films, Morbius is a chaotic and cruddy looking mess, a dull and listless watch-checker made to be ignored on streaming while you scroll through Twitter. It's poorly paced, barely has a story worth following, and has all the markings of a movie heavily reworked during post-production.

Unlike the Venom films, Morbius doesn't even make a token effort to have fun with its character or concept. I didn't like Venom or its sequel at all, but there was a crude energy to both films, especially the second. They weren't good by any definition, but they occasionally seemed to try to engage the audience.

Morbius, on the other hand, grudgingly trudges from one predictable beat to another, barely developing a plot about a scientist with a rare blood disease who gains vampiric powers after he experiments on himself. What are those powers, exactly? The movie never really defines them, except to show Dr. Michael Morbius (a lethargic, unusually bland Jared Leto) swinging around his lab and occasionally moving with such speed that he turns into an airborne purple goo. If you find yourself in a room with him, be sure to wear an N95.

Elsewhere in the movie, there's a close childhood friend, Milo, another blood-disease sufferer played by former Doctor Who Matt Smith. An hour or so into the movie, Milo becomes a villain for no apparent reason other than that the movie eventually needs one. At times the movie seems to want to liken the experience of the two lead characters to the experience of gay men during the early years of AIDS. But it has absolutely nothing to say about this comparison except to vaguely gesture in its direction. Like everything about Morbius, the central metaphor is entirely inert. This is a $75 million movie without a single remotely interesting idea.

The hope, then, seems to be that audiences will flock to it anyway because of its tenuous connections to the Marvel machine. Some of the posters explicitly play on this connection, advertising the film as the dawn of "a new Marvel legend"—true in the sense that Morbius is an old Marvel Comics character, but false in the sense that the producers and creative forces behind the MCU had nothing to do with making the movie Morbius.

Indeed, watching an off-brand not-quite Marvel movie like this is probably the best way to demonstrate the Marvel difference, and why the superhero brand has remained so successful across so many movies and TV shows for so many years. Even the very worst actual Marvel movie—and I'm specifically talking about Eternals, which was three hours of cosmic dreck—displays more ingenuity and delivers more genuine spectacle than a rote cash-in like Morbius.

And on the small screen, with large-for-TV but comparatively modest budgets, Marvel's work has remained somewhere between pretty good and excellent.

Consider, for example, the pilot episode of Moon Knight, an official MCU TV series that debuted on streaming service Disney+ this week. Like Morbius, Moon Knight is a modernized riff on an obscure comic book character, a man haunted by demons and granted supernatural power. But it's clever and engaging, with character gags and nifty action and a pair of high-powered performances from stars Oscar Isaac and Ethan Hawke at the center. It breathes life into an old, lesser-known character. Morbius' nickname is "the living vampire," but this movie is utterly dead on arrival.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bernie Sanders Is Wrong About the American 'Oligarchs'

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

MoviesAIDSSuperheroesComics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

    (a lethargic, unusually bland Jared Leto) swinging around his lab and occasionally moving with such speed that he turns into an airborne purple goo

    So, a slow cinema art film that approaches the outskirts of humor, then.

  2. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Save your time re-watch blade, it to is a marvel superhero vampire movie

  3. damikesc   3 years ago

    Behold the next wave of Marvel movies. Note how, outside of Spider-Man, they have been shit?

    It's because MCU was based on the stuff thru the 1980's while the newer movies will be newer stuff that virtually nobody reads nor likes.

    Marvel is going to regret that.

    1. Dogvalor   3 years ago

      Spider-Man was also shit.

  4. Nardz   3 years ago

    MCU studio doesn't even crack the top 3 of superhero movies:

    1a. Watchmen
    1b. Deadpool 2
    3. Blade

  5. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

    Ah, Jared Leto, an actor whose entire career since My So-Called Life has been based on the evergreen perception that he's the Next Big Thing, instead of just another bland, mopey performer.

    1. mad.casual   3 years ago

      Yup. I've met a couple people a couple of times who've ranted about him. I have yet to see anything that convinces me they were right and I strongly suspect that they continue to see more evidence that they were wrong.

      1. mad.casual   3 years ago

        ranted

        Well, more raved, I guess.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

        To the extent I've ever seen him come off as a notable screen presence, it's only been when he's placed alongside far more talented/charismatic actors--Claire Danes, Colin Farrell, Matthew McConaughey, etc.

        1. Nardz   3 years ago

          He was solid in the movie where Danny Glover was a serial killer, but the role didn't require much.
          He was an annoying, awful, drama class kid wigger of a joker

  6. Zarquon   3 years ago

    > And on the small screen, with large-for-TV but comparatively modest budgets, Marvel's work has remained somewhere between pretty good and excellent.

    You forget the almost-unwatchable *Inhumans.*

    1. Inigo Montoya   3 years ago

      All of it, big and small screen, is now unwatchable to me.

      First Disney killed Star Wars for good. Then they did a remake of Mulan where they thanked China for genocide. They also , injected self-righteous wokeness into all their stuff since Avengers Infinity War. It’s not even sincere wokeness. It’s self-contradicting wokeness that they carefully edit out to appeal to China’s censors. (That’s because Disney believes that governments that commit genocide deserve ass-kissing.)

      So go ahead and enjoy it yourself, but Disney’s “subvert their expectations” schlock is not for me, a person who loved the original Star Wars trilogy as a little kid who’d go see fun movies with his dad, and who loved Bronze Age comics and still has his collection.

      1. damikesc   3 years ago

        Avengers End-Game was God awful. Could've sliced an hour of it and lost literally nothing. If I am dying, I will watch that to make my last hours seem endless.

  7. Thaddeus Bouchard   3 years ago

    Morbius was an okay movie. I enjoyed the actions, plots, and digital effects.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Why Is the Energy Department Making Rules About Sex and School Sports?

Jeff Luse | 6.17.2025 5:25 PM

Citizen Fundraisers Outpace E.U. in Arming Ukraine Against Russia

Miroslav Hanušniak | 6.17.2025 3:45 PM

South Carolina County Ends Its Civil Forfeiture Blitz After 20 Years

Rob Johnson and Daryl James | 6.17.2025 1:45 PM

How Much of Trump's 'Built in America' Phone Is Actually Built in America?

Jack Nicastro | 6.17.2025 1:00 PM

Lab-Grown Salmon Gets FDA Approval

Emma Camp | 6.17.2025 11:12 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!