Maintaining Biofuel Mandates Worsens Global Food Crisis Caused By Russia's Invasion of Ukraine
Turning food into fuel has always been a dubious proposition.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine is disrupting both countries' exports of grain. Combined, Ukraine and Russia account for 26 percent of global wheat exports and 16 percent of corn exports. Just how deeply the war will cut grain exports from both countries this year is uncertain.
However, world markets evidently expect significant reductions. For example, the Food and Agriculture Organization's food price index averaged 140.7 points in February 2022, up 5.3 points (3.9 percent) from January and as much as 24.1 points (20.7 percent) above its level a year ago. The index, which measures the changes in both the nominal and real prices of agricultural foods like grains, meat, and sugar, has a baseline of 100 set for the period between 2014 and 2016. Current numbers are at an all-time high, exceeding the previous peak in February 2011 by 3.1 points.

With Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the loss of global grain exports could be in the millions of tons. Last year, Ukraine exported just over 23 million tons of corn and Russia just under 4 million tons. On top of these supply uncertainties, increases in what farmers must pay for fertilizer and fuel are also contributing to the global rise in food prices. Keep in mind that similarly steep increases in grain prices in 2008 and 2011 coincided with a wave of civil unrest across the globe, including the upheavals known as the Arab Spring revolts.
One good step toward making up for global grain shortfalls and lowering food prices would be to end biofuel mandates around the world. Currently, one-third of the U.S. corn crop—about 125 million tons—is turned into bioethanol that is blended into gasoline. Turning millions of tons of perfectly good food and feed grains into biofuels for automobiles has always been a dubious proposition.
"Because the biofuel market is entirely driven by subsidies, you can unplug it literally with the stroke of a pen," notes Ariel Brunner, Birdlife International's EU policy director, in New Scientist. "We are literally burning a hell of a lot of food," he added. "You are taking food off the table of people in the slums of Cairo to subsidize rich people driving SUVs."
Scrapping biofuels mandates would tend to drive down prices by supplying the global demand for food and feed grains and thus help avoid a looming global food crisis.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Of course, an America free of the democrat party war on freedom would be able to step up grain production to cover most or all of these losses.
But no, evil oil must die, even of it takes starving half the world.
Remember, remember, the eighth of November.
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA03 I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail.......... http://CurrentJobs64.Cf
We really quickly went from 'paying for for gas the price of freedom' to 'not eating 3 meals a day is the price of freedom'.
We're just trying to flatten the curve. It will all be over in two weeks.
*more for gas
It’s ok, the rich guys won’t starve.
Back to blaming Russia for the Nazi-Regime politics I see...
Russia didn't inflict bio-fuel mandates on the USA; The DNC Nazi's did.
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1508431773889351689?t=v7oKNWG0-ioiO01dbtKsWA&s=19
Another extremely gruesome video has turned up, showing a Ukrainian soldier murdering someone with a knife - accounts are contradictory, some sources are claiming the victim was another Ukrainian soldier accused of being a Russian spy, others are saying he was a Russian POW
The victim in the video is wearing jeans, so possibly a civilian - the Ukrainian soldier murdering him (in a particularly savage way; I really recommend against watching the video) accuses him of working for Russia, he proclaims "Glory to Ukraine, death to enemies" at the end
War is hell.
Don't mention some of the shit our soldiers have done in the past. Or our allies have done. Just finished The Day of Battle, and the Free French Troops colonial troops raped more Italian women, who were our allies by then, in a couple weeks than German troops had raped in Italy during the whole second world war. Let's not mention what Soviet troops did to civilians in 1943-1945 as the occupied German territory. Or what Soviet troops did to Polish civilians in 1939. It'll make you feel Truman was right when he proposed letting the Nazis and Soviets kill each other and then the western allies taking care of whoever was left standing.
My Lai massacre.
How about Churchill's expulsion of ethnic Germans post WW2. Something like a half million dead.
FDR turning Jews fleeing Germany away and sending them back to the third Reich where many of them would die during the Holocaust. (Sorry probably just summoned Misek, my bad).
I wonder if he recoils in the presence of Stars of David in the same way vampires shun crucifixes.
The US Army had a shooting prisoners problem. Patton mentioned it.
Shit happens. In wartime, particularly bad shit happens.
OH! OH! Look!
Nardz finds an anecdote hoping others will thereby accept his bullshit! Natch, it's on twitter; the only source nardz is capable of understanding.
It's a measure of nardzs' mental abilities that he never understood that "the devil made me do it!" was a joke.
Is the US funding, arming, and training russiamanbad?
Nope.
But the US is funding, arming, and training the Ukrainians who sqrlvo is so quick to defend.
Go volunteer for the foreign legion, pussy.
You were there and SAW what happened? Or know someone who was, that you trust completely?
If not then WHY are you spreading gossip? We have seem thousands of cases where the video editor took a certain event, cut and scrambled the video, and made somethine entirely different "happen".
You trust everything you see on the twit-verse? Then YOU are part of the problem.
Rememver early on in "Putin's War" when some "current real battle footage" was proven to have been taken in other countries, sometimes decades ago? Cameras can lie when someone wants to tell a lie.
Hey, this is on twitter, for pete's sake! The only source nardz has the attention span to understand, and obviously the most authoritative source besides, right nardz?
Better question: Why would anyone accept a twitter feed as anything worth repeating to adults?
Ok, misek.
https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1508525310295351298?t=1G99uNhJ12blEXulfSbFJw&s=19
Doocy: "The big things you say on the world stage keep getting walked back."
Biden: "What's getting walked backed?"
Biden: You told troops they are going to Ukraine, the U.S. would use a chemical weapon, and called for regime change in Russia.
Biden: "None of the 3 occurred."
[Video]
Biden is an idiot and a liar, news at 11. Unfortunately, he's an idiot that could lie us into a third world war.
Spends on what your definition of “is” is.
Video of the three occurring.
https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1508550553516883975
The contribution of high fuel and fertilizer to food costs is entirely secondary. The farmers aren't charging more for their crops, we are price takers not makers. We don't get to decide the cost, we take what the buyer bid (we can refuse to sell but that runs its own costs, because storage isn't cheap and grains degrade over time even when properly stored). The cost instead comes from reduced production. High fertilizer means fewer farmers will use fertilizer and or use less, which will decrease yield. Higher fuel prices will result in more farmers putting fields into fallow or registering for CRP.
As for the argument that the corn used in ethanol isn't used for food anyhow, this ignores the fact that agricultural land is a finite resource and every acre of corn planted for ethanol production is one less acre planted for food or animal feed. Corn ethanol has been a steady market, so many farmers grow for it. It may not top the market every year, but it lessens the impact of most market dips. It's a trade off, you may not break the bank in high price years, but you also avoid getting broke in low price years.
Finally, most American farmers are facing a catch-22 this year, all input costs are way up, while there is no guarantee commodity prices will remain high (they're forecasted to but they were in 2015-2016, right before they crashed in August and many farmers and ranchers lost their shirts in the deal). Normally the best way to hedge this bet is to sell on contract, except many buyers aren't selling contracts right now due to the market volatility. Additionally, volatility leads to margin calls, which cash starved farmers may be unable to make. Drought also plays into it, as many areas are dealing with years long drought and the associated decrease in yield, making it quite possible that you won't be able to make your contract. If things go well, we should be able to make up for our losses this year, but it's surviving until payday that will be the difficulty.
This article lays out some of the problems farmers are facing this year and why we haven't been able to take advantage yet of the high commodities market.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/when-to-stop-investing-in-the-stock-market-wild-price-swings-are-shaking-the-resolve-of-some-is-it-time-to-bail-out-of-equities-and-bonds-11643486328
As for the argument that the corn used in ethanol isn't used for food anyhow, this ignores the fact that agricultural land is a finite resource and every acre of corn planted for ethanol production is one less acre planted for food or animal feed.
Not entirely since there's material left over from ethanol production that can be used for animal feed or other products.
DDG are an important fat and protein source but are an additive rather than a staple in a ration formulation. I'm a ruminant nutritionist by training.
you forget that while BULK may be available on the cheap, the greater part of the nutirents needed as feed are gone. So in a sense you are both right, but the bottom line is waste from ethanol production has limited use in feeding or finishing livestock.
Yeah, soy bean meal and canola meal and sunflower meal are almost as good as DDG not to mention you can still get DDG from alcohol production for human consumption as well.
"agricultural land is a finite resource", ....and Never-mind that FLPMA Act of 1976 that UN-Constitutionally put a whopping 35% of the entire USA landmass 100% under 'Feds' Nazi-Communist Control.
Yes, wasting land growing fuel is stupid and what's more, methanol is probably 'way worse in CO^2 outputs than the gasoline it replaces:
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=engineering+explained+youtube+methenol&docid=608028362776738561&mid=4065E53D96642E8E21C84065E53D96642E8E21C8&view=detail&FORM=VIRE
Fuel cost increases and scarcity of the fuel has naught to do with Putni's being forced into making his costly move.
REmember what Sleepy Joe did during his first week in office? He scribbled on aome documents some powerbroker had put in front of him and with those scribbles reversed thepathway Trump had us on, and the point we had reached, of energy independence and net export of oil products. Trump and Putin also had a pretty solid working relatioinship, anohter set of polig=tical gains Biden very quickly reversed. Bye Din ended a pipeline project, halted fracking, ended much new exploratioin, , ended ANWR devlopment NONE of those EE OO's had athing to do wiht Putin, it was ALL Biden's stringpullers.
Get a grip on reality.
Now that Russia wants payment for LNG in Rubles, biofuel is more important than ever.
Sadly, removing ethanol means 15% less fuel to go around.
I was looking at getting an F-250 for the ranch, prefer the flex fuel engine over the diesel, as the maintenance costs are less, as is fuel. Been debating if E-85 is worth the decrease in mileage my friend says he figured it out and at greater than 35 cent differential it pays him even with the decreased miles.
(Picture) "Does that make you horny, baby?"
"Scrapping biofuels mandates would tend to drive down prices by supplying the global demand for food and feed grains and thus help avoid a looming global food crisis." Scrapping ethanol in gasoline also improves the amount of energy in a gallon of fuel, so it's a win there too. More MPG and more food.