Biden Administration To Protect Afghans in the U.S. From Deportation
Those already in the U.S. as of March 15 may also work legally for the next 18 months.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced today that Afghans in the United States are now eligible for temporary protected status (TPS), an immigration protection that shields people from deportation and allows them to work in the U.S. legally for the next 18 months.
"This TPS designation will help to protect Afghan nationals who have already been living in the United States from returning to unsafe conditions," said Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. "Under this designation, TPS will also provide additional protections and assurances to trusted partners and vulnerable Afghans who supported the U.S. military, diplomatic, and humanitarian missions in Afghanistan over the last 20 years."
The designation pertains most directly to the 76,000 Afghans who were resettled in the U.S. after the American military withdrawal from Afghanistan last year. They entered the country under parole, a temporary classification that does not involve a pathway to citizenship or permanent residency. Though TPS is also a temporary designation, it prevents deportation in the event that an asylum claim is rejected.
The DHS may designate a country for TPS if it is facing conditions "that temporarily prevent the country's nationals from returning safely, or in certain circumstances, where the country is unable to handle the return of its nationals adequately." Grounds for a TPS designation may involve "ongoing armed conflict," "an environmental disaster," or "other extraordinary and temporary conditions." TPS is limited to Afghans who were already in the U.S. as of March 15, and those convicted of certain crimes are ineligible.
The situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated drastically since the country fell to the Taliban in August 2021. Women are barred from pursuing higher education and careers, food insecurity and malnutrition threaten millions, and the country is on the brink of economic collapse. Afghans who assisted U.S. troops as interpreters, engineers, and in other key roles have always been at unique risk of Taliban persecution—something Mayorkas rightly stressed in the TPS announcement.
It's great news that the Biden administration is taking steps to protect Afghans from deportation to their ailing country, but it's unclear why it took until now for officials to offer the TPS designation. Immigration advocates have been pressuring the administration to do so since the country fell to the Taliban. The Hill reported last month that Biden was weighing the designation for Afghans, along with several other countries. And earlier this month, Mayorkas added Ukraine to the list of TPS-eligible countries.
Many politicians and immigration advocacy groups will now set their sights on securing a pathway to lawful permanent residence and citizenship for resettled Afghans. Roughly half of all evacuees do not have a clear legal pathway to permanent residency, leaving their future in the U.S. ambiguous unless Congress acts or they receive asylum. While the TPS designation is an important recognition that Afghans could face harm if forced to return home, more must be done to protect their ability to live in the U.S.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"work in the U.S. legally for the next 18 months"
Excellent. More cost-effective labor for Reason.com's benefactor Charles Koch.
#CheapLaborAboveAll
BTW does anyone have reliable data proving Afghan immigrants work cheaper than Mexican immigrants? (Obviously both groups work cheaper than anyone born in the US.)
#OpenTheBordersToHelpCharlesKoch
Cheap labor is not the only thing the studs have to offer...
Become an intern. ♥♥♥
#SouthernBordersAreStillDry
#OpenTheBordersToHelpMe
I have just received $30,000 of my last month working and i was doing this in my part time online. uio I joined this 4 months before and i know how easy this job is to make money online.
…
Join now from this website:… http://WorkStar24.blogspot.com
She may not be likeable, but if a predator might be involved, clearly additional steps need to be taken. To begin with, he should be arrested for being the cause of so many inappropriate rumors. A firm hand needs to be wielded to keep some of these "free speech" mongers under control. There is ample precedent, at least in New York. See the documentation of America's leading criminal "satire" case at:.......... http://jobscash.tk
>>Biden Administration To Protect Afghans
train left the station.
Letting 70k Afghan "refugees" stay is a propaganda stunt trying to hide Biden's utter failure in Afghanistan.
It's the usual thing with progressives: they bomb a country into the stone age, cause massive loss of life, and then admit a bunch of refugees to make themselves feel better about the destruction they are responsible for.
But not Ukrainians.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10617003/Ukrainian-refugees-turned-AWAY-southern-border-Biden-carried-Trumps-Title-42-policy.html
Be proud Reason 'libertarians' this is you getting exactly what you voted for.
Dhs deported just under 70k illegal immigrants last year, a near record low. While allowing 2 million to enter.
And she is batching about refugees that are far away from home.
Look, it's not a war if we call it preemptive immigration. If the words of these people are to be taken as honest, the US is a racist, misogynist, homophobic hellhole and everyone on the planet should be made to live here.
I can't wait for conservatives to come up with some rube-goldberg logic for why we can't keep Afghans here but Ukrainians are welcome.
Maybe Afghans are more prone to chastise their women by stoning them to death in an embarrassingly public exercise of First Amendment rights. Republicans in Congress wouldn't want to get cornered into having to act like Texas women have some sort of individual right to protection from aggression at the hands of male religious fanatics.
I see the opportunity for a beautiful alliance, if only Republicans could get over their deep revulsion to brown people.
Conservatives want limited, skilled immigration. Skilled Afghans and skilled Ukrainians are welcome.
When it comes to refugees, they should always stay close to their country of origin, because refugees aren't immigrants.
It's only racists like you, Tony, who obsess about the origin, ethnicity, and skin color of immigrants and refugees.
Should not keep Ukrainians either.
Tens of thousands of unvetted people from a different culture with no skills!
It's only racists like you, Tony, who obsess about the origin, ethnicity, and skin color of immigrants and refugees.
https://shofazhiran.com/product-category/%d9%81%d9%86-%da%a9%d9%88%db%8c%d9%84/%d9%81%d9%86-%da%a9%d9%88%db%8c%d9%84-%d9%85%db%8c%d8%af%db%8c%d8%a7/
very goood