With Just 10 Signatures, This Gas Station Owner Could Kill a Ban on Pumping Your Own Gas
Legislators in New Jersey and Oregon keep failing to repeal their states' bans on self-service gas stations. Is Massachusetts' small town direct democracy the solution?

Despite bipartisan support, a sufficiently compromised bill, and a crisp, professionally crafted public relations campaign to back it up, Oregon lawmakers have once again failed to legalize self-service gas stations statewide.
The state legislature adjourned earlier this week without passing H.B. 4151. That bill would have let full-grown adults fuel up their own cars, provided gas stations also kept a prescribed number of full-service pumps for motorists who weren't quite ready to handle their own nozzles.
The death blow, reports Portland's Willamette Week, was an estimate from the state fire marshal that it would cost nearly $550,000 to regulate "consumer pumping."
"We didn't see this coming," Gabriel Zirkle, of the Oregon Fuel Association, told the Willamette Week earlier this month. "Now, we have to come up with a fee to answer the question of how do we pay for the fire marshal."
The defeat of what appeared to be a promising bill is obviously disappointing for advocates of self-service gas stations. Supporters of the freedom to fuel shouldn't completely despair, however.
While Oregon's Legislature-led effort might have spun out, a "gas"-roots movement to legalize self-service is revving up in the small community of Arlington, Massachusetts.
The 40,000-person Boston suburb is one of the few communities in the country to still maintain a prohibition on self-service gas. A few other Massachusetts towns, including Weymouth, bans self-service gas stations as well, as does the whole state of New Jersey.
The requirement that pumps be manned by an attendant has been a major thorn in the side of Elias Elkhaouli, an Arlington resident and gas station owner, who says it's increasingly difficult to find people willing to work the pumps.
"It's very hard to find employees to work seven, eight hours in the sun or in the cold," he tells Reason. "The young generation don't accept those jobs. They want to drive Uber, drive Amazon." His customers also often have health concerns about interacting directly with a gas station attendant, he says.
Fortunately for Elkhaouli, Massachusetts' tradition of small-town near-direct democracy lets him do something about Arlington's crushing self-service mandate. Most of the smaller towns in the state are governed by town meetings—annual assemblies of eligible voters that set a town's budget and vote on local bylaws.
Some town meetings are pure direct democracy, where every eligible voter in the town gets to vote at the meeting. Others are more like mass legislatures where only elected town meeting members get a vote. Arlington's town meeting is made up of 252 elected representatives.
Crucially, these town meetings also allow any resident who can get ten signatures from fellow residents to place an item for consideration on the warrant (a.k.a. agenda) of the upcoming meeting, where it will be discussed and voted on.
This is exactly what Elkhaouli did. By talking with neighbors and customers, he says he was quickly able to gather the ten signatures needed to place a citizen article allowing self-service gas stations on the upcoming town meeting warrant.
With the help of a local attorney, he drafted up the language for the proposed bylaw change.
Thus far, things look promising for Elkhaouli's reform. He says the town's select board—its standing city council—voted to support the legalization of self-service gas stations at their Monday meeting.
That vote is purely advisory. It will still have to be approved by the full town meeting in late April. But Elkhaouli is bullish about his article's chances.
"People want change in the town," he says, noting that recent town meetings have approved such liberalizing measures as legalizing LED signs and liquor sales. "You cannot live back in the 1800s anymore."
John Leone, the moderator of the upcoming Arlington town meeting also tells Reason he thinks self-service gas is likely to pass in Arlington.
If the article does get approved, Leone says it's then sent to the state attorney who will review it to make sure it doesn't violate state law or isn't too vague to be unenforceable. Provided it passes both those tests, it will go into effect, and Arlington motorists will be liberated to pump as much gas their cars can hold.
The upshot is that these low barriers to average citizens reforming their community's laws at the local level allow self-service advocates like Elkhaouli to avoid the machinations of state legislatures that have proven so deadly to reforms in Oregon and New Jersey.
As mentioned, Oregon's reform was killed by its surprisingly high implementation costs. Those implementation costs were a result of legislators' efforts to craft an initiative that would please everybody.
To satisfy concerns from unions that it would cost jobs and concerns from disability advocates that gas station attendants would no longer be provided for those who needed them, reform-minded legislators included provisions requiring that a certain number of pumps remain full-service. To mollify consumers' worries that they'd be gouged for continuing to use the full-service pumps, lawmakers also banned gas stations from charging higher prices at attendant-manned pumps.
All these politically practical compromise regulations need to be enforced. That's why the state's fire marshal said the agency would need almost $550,000 to hire new staff to enforce the new law and respond to complaints. With no time to find additional money in the budget, Oregon's reform failed.
Politics could also get in the way of reform passing in New Jersey, where another bill ending the state's ban on self-service gas pumps is being considered.
Like in Oregon, the reform effort has the backing of a bipartisan group of legislators and a snazzy, industry-backed campaign, Fuel Your Own Way NJ. The bill in question would let small gas stations go totally self-service. Stations with more than four pumps would have to have a full-service option, reports Politico.
But the measure still needs support from legislative leadership and Democrat Gov. Phil Murphy to pass, says Politico. Thus far, neither has committed to supporting the bill. A promising 2015 Republican-sponsored reform to end the state's self-service ban was also killed by the then-state senate president.
When Oregon first introduced its bill to let people pump their own gas, I noted how any effort to give people a little bit more freedom is always an uphill battle:
Despite having some 48 examples of self-service working out pretty smoothly, many Oregonians fret that things could go terribly wrong on attempt number 49. To overcome these fears, supporters of self-service gas stations must busy themselves writing compromise legislation and spinning up public relations campaigns about "choice at the pump."
Massachusetts' town meeting style of direct democracy might offer a compelling model for how to overcome the status quo bias of state legislatures and the horse-trading required to get anything through them.
That obviously won't lead to libertarian results on every or even most issues. On self-service gas station reform though, it appears promising. Put more power in the hands of ordinary citizens, and you might see gas nozzles appear there soon enough.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
threesome joke in that pic somewhere.
She don't want yer pickle...
She just wants to ride her motor-sickle!
(I know, 'cause I already asked her. I am working on my motor-sickle disguise as we speak; maybe she will ride me!)
Oh noes! Populism!
"You cannot live back in the 1800s anymore."
https://babylonbee.com/news/amish-man-smiles-smugly-as-he-rides-by-gas-station-with-6-prices
" . . . was an estimate from the state fire marshal that it would cost nearly $550,000 to regulate "consumer pumping."
I call bullshit.
There is zero cost, because there is no need to regulate.
48 states put a sticker on the pump to state the obvious, and let it go at that.
I've been to gas stations out in flyover country that are completely self-serve. As in no attendants at all after hours; the C-Store isn't open after 7 or 8 PM. You drive up and no one is home, but the pumps are still on. You put your debit or credit card in, pump your own gas, and go along your merry way.
No warning signs or stickers, either.
Can't they just deputize everyone with a drivers license in Oregon and NJ and that would solve the self serve pumping carnage?
....or just add gas pumping to drivers training curriculum.
With the price of gas spiking the pump jockeys will soon have to don white tie and tails when serving it up.
As a life-long resident of New Jersey, I don't pump my gas, except on the occasions I am out of state. I have to say I am just fine with that. I like staying in the car in bad weather and letting the attendant fill 'er up.
"...a life-long resident of New Jersey."
Eww. Who admits that?
LarryB and... I dunno. Springsteen? Yeah, I think that's about all of them.
M. Richard Feder from Portland, New Jersey? (Some chick named Roseanne Roseanna something told me about him)
It's great that you don't want self serve. But, it's not about self serve, it's about preventing choice, and over regulating life in America.
And if you want self serve and enough of your rich friends also want it (and are willing to pay extra for the service of course), there will be supply of full service pumps to serve you and your friends.
If not, well, start your own gas station that offers full serve and take over that market. Good luck...
Markets. They Work. (At least in this case).
Not gonna sugarcoat it. There’s a lot of fucking morons here…
I have previously lived in Oregon. People there like the no-self-service law. If it were repealed, gas probably wouldn't get any cheaper, and you wouldn't have someone pumping your gas for you. And if full-service was optional, no gas station would offer it (see 48 other states, for example).
It's a weird law, but the voters have the incentives figured out pretty well. A few people hate waiting for someone to pump it for them, but not many.
Where I live (in California) there are a few stations that will pump your gas. You do pay more for gas pumped via that service of course.
Personally, I never use them even though I could afford to but if I lived in snow country there might be times I would.
Of course, I also use self checkout by choice even if I have to spend a little bit longer in line to do so (which is, admittedly, rare).
The death blow, reports Portland's Willamette Week, was an estimate from the state fire marshal that it would cost nearly $550,000 to regulate "consumer pumping."
Sounds like somebody did not get his slice of patronage.
I thought regulating "consumer pumping" was ENB's province.
Traffic Control?
Town meeting (even "representative town meeting" --- grrrr) sounds great, but people have to attend and participate, which has become more and more of an issue. My town has slid from rep. town meeting to a "town council" (13 member) who then hire a manager, but there is always a move afoot to go to a mayoral system since it will be "more efficient".
People gotta get off of their butts and get involved!
It's not just state legislators who are blocking self-service in Jersey. The voters don't want it! Don't take my word for it, check out the latest poll:
"Despite a new bill that was introduced earlier this week by state lawmakers that would allow the option for self-service gas in New Jersey, only 5 percent of those polled were unsure of whether they wanted the change while an overwhelming 73 percent of residents said they prefer having their gas pumped for them and only 22 percent said the opposite."
https://www.rutgers.edu/news/rutgers-eagleton-poll-new-jerseyans-dont-want-pump-their-own-gas
I live near the Oregon border and drive there weekly. I can assure you the gas-pumping racket is Luddites all the way down.
Lobster Girl is no longer even a thing. You notice the direct correlation in the rise of Sex Worker reporting with the drop in showing any totty of any kind?
Unionizing your Sex Workers means... no sex. Just like Unionizing your teachers meant no teaching.
The world was a much sexier place when we thought sex was wrong.
Learn from your mistakes.
I, too, would put my hose in that tank! Fill 'er up, Joe!
Sex trafficking is in a real jam!
Old Arlo Guthrie song.
Motorcycle = Motor sickle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvLtNBm1yyA
Strawberry?