Marco Rubio Accidentally Makes the Case Against Common-Good Conservatism at CPAC
Here’s hoping the Florida senator recognizes threats to freedom when they come from the right as well as the left.

At a conference marked by MAGA caps and periodic chants of "Let's go, Brandon!" Sen. Marco Rubio (R–Fla.) this morning opted for an earnest appeal.
"The American Revolution—what was revolutionary about it was it had this audacious idea that rights were from God, not from a government," he said from the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) main stage in Orlando. "The founders of this nation understood that human nature was, if they ever got power, there would always be people that would want to make everybody else live, think, say the things they wanted them to say, and do the things they wanted them to do. And they built protections against it. Because none of us are immune from it."
The 10-minute speech was intended as a warning against cancel culture and COVID-related mandates from the left. Deliberate or not, it was effectively also a case against the self-proclaimed "Common-Good Conservatives" who have spent the last few years demanding that the right support "muscular" government with the power to reorient society to their liking.
I summarized that view in 2020:
All societies have rulers, the Will-to-Power Conservatives seem to be saying; what matters above all else is ensuring that our tribe is dominant.
Don't take my word for it. In a recent symposium published by The American Conservative, editor of American Affairs Julius Krein (echoing his colleague Gladden Pappin) complains that "contemporary conservatism" lacks "a serious approach to wielding political power." Hillsdale College's David Azerrad argues that conservatives must learn to be "manly," "combative," and "comfortable" using "the levers of state power…to reward friends and punish enemies." And Claremont's Matthew J. Peterson insists that "conservatism must not merely make arguments…it must act on them, wielding 'regime-level' power in the service of good political order to do so."
Rubio himself has adopted common-good rhetoric, beginning with a 2019 address at the Catholic University of America. But his CPAC speech raised at least the possibility that the senator, whose parents immigrated to South Florida from Cuba in 1956, has reconsidered that approach in the last couple of years.
"I was raised by people, and surrounded by people, and to this day live surrounded by people who know what life was like in other countries," he said. "They know how special America is and they know what real tyranny looks like. And frankly, even though they've had an enormous impact on my life, as I look back now, I took for granted their warnings about what happens to a society and to a people when we empower those who believe that their job is to tell the rest of us how to live and think and believe."
Ultimately, Rubio said, "the most valuable thing we have" is our freedom, and when it's lost, "it is so hard to reclaim it, to get it back." He's right about that. Here's hoping he recognizes the threat when it comes from the right as well as the left.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
>>"Common-Good Conservatives" ... demanding that the right support "muscular" government
so, Democrats?
You've missed the point. Any solution that requires a "strong" leader is wrong. But that is what modern American conservatism has been on about for the past decade, especially the last half decade since Trump. We need effective leaders, but we also need government that does NOT have so much power. The conservatives should NOT be demanding a government that "make everybody else live, think, say the things they wanted them to say, and do the things they wanted them to do."
This isnt' about Left versus Right, or Red versus Blue, or tribe versus tribe. This is about government not having the power to do this things, because people should have the power to live their own lives without having to ask government permission. So yes, a whole bunch of Democrat things are wrong, cancel culture is wrong, identity politics is wrong, CRT in schools is wrong, all that stuff is wrong, but so is the shit coming form the right, about punishing social media and banning things in schools and all the social right stuff they still want to ban and all the protectionism and tariffs and all the pearl clutching over immigratns and refugees when they themselves are the children and grandchildren of immigrants and refugees.
The purpose of government is NOT to conduct Kulturwar. Not for the Left and not for the Right.
See how it works? CRT in schools is wrong but so is banning CRT in schools so shut up and let the government indoctrinate your children with racist political education and LGBTQ+ recruitment.
You can't prove a word that you quote from the scared white mobs. I'll let you in on a little secret. The white world in the US is coming to an end. Hispanics will rule the second half of this century you might reconsider all the hate tossed at Hispanic border crossings or your political agenda will melt like a dying flower.
So if left Dems are wrong like right Repoobicanos, why not notice the LIB that used to appear on Ballots before the Anarchist Communist infiltrated the ticket?
Yeah Hank, ‘infiltrators’ everywhere!!!!!
Good job Brandybuck!
Trump is-was all about HIMSELF and "all votes not for MEEE are fraudulent", which is a severe case of Government Almighty (when Trump was POTUS) doing things that it shouldn't do!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/trump-election-warnings-leaving-office/index.html
A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses
Essential heart and core of the LIE by Trump: “ANY election results not confirming MEEE as Your Emperor, MUST be fraudulent!”
September 13 rally: “The Democrats are trying to rig this election because that’s the only way they’re going to win,” he said.
I have no idea how long it will take for the GOP to heal itself, and wash away the stench of Trump. I hope it won't be years or decades. We NEED two viable political parties!
Sqrlsy's are wrong
The Shrillary party ran ads urging College electors to trash all votes that weren't cast for HEEEEELAREEE after LP spoiler votes dashed her hopes. So if Plucky Squirrel thinks he has proven there is a difference between republican looter prohibitionist fascists and democratic looter prohibitionist communists, THAT, to paraphrase Boris, "Ees argument even Moose can see through!"
>>You've missed the point.
I don't miss points.
>>Any solution that requires a "strong" leader is wrong.
same thing I said. mine was in joke form.
Yeh, but his mentioned Trump, which trumps your joke. So there!
another victim of the Trump trump lol.
I don't miss points.
You do with the BOWF SIDEZ flimflam! Sure, one side wants a strong leader to mold society in his image, regardless of who the leader is and even if that means bringing women's lib to the wilds of Afghanistan, but the other wants a strong leader to drain the swamp, tell NATO to pay their fair share or GTFO, pwn PC collectivists, and give America back to Americans. Both sides want a strong man equally, ergo, your point is wrong and both sides are equally bad. QED.
you often seem entirely smarter than many, but if you don't get my jokes I can't help you
The fascination with muscular leaders is not a Trump phenomena, you TDS-addled twit! Look at cows, monkeys, chickens, prairie dogs .... it probably goes back to amoebas.
Oh you mean just government? Tell me monkey leadership councils aren't government of a sort. Tell me G. Washington wasn't a muscular leader.
What kind of macho man wears a wig?
Cancels out with macho points for wooden teeth.
The purpose of government is NOT to conduct Kulturwar. Not for the Left and not for the Right.
Agreed. The 2A isn't a cultural issue and abortion isn't a right. Kulturwar is a done deal.
Let's start with Trump --- HE DE-REGULATED the Government....
Then we'll move onto your other subjects. A good 20% of the Red-Team doesn't follow the "common good" conservative ideology..
Team BLUE astonishes the world with their "common good" nazi ideology and runs a good 99% across the entire team in favor. It is the very definition of [We] mob Power-Mad. As-is their pridefully touted theme of Democracy tailed with National Socialism...
Yes; the GOP has many RINO'S in it that vote with Democrats but it also has but the VERY FEW real USA patriots in it. So what's the conclusion???????????????????????
Talk smack about the GOP and excuse Team Blue??? Rubio has a pretty crappy pitch history but his speech was WELL WORTH taking to heart for anyone who loves the *real* USA. That's more than I can say about 99% of the speeches given by the other side.
Just consider the written legislation....
Federal Reserve Act DEMOCRAT
Practically every Welfare legislation DEMOCRAT
Even the Cares Act.... Project-fully blamed on Trump written by DEMOCRATS and vote thwarted by a DEMOCRAT....
This isn't that hard. If Republicans pitch $500M, Democrats want $500T. The only argument by Democrats is how much 'badder' their team can be.
Brandybuck, you, like others who tout immigration rights under the mantra, "and all the pearl clutching over immigrants and refugees when they themselves are the children and grandchildren of immigrants and refugees," deny a basic understanding of the differences between legal and illegal. I know of no conservative who disagrees with legal immigration.
Much of that laundry list of wrongs could be covered by Government owning and running schools is wrong. Conservatives were OK with that when they controlled the state Ed departments and school boards. Better to privatize than fight over who gets to control the 50+ near-monopolies.
The founders of this nation understood that human nature was, if they ever got power, there would always be people that would want to make everybody else live, think, say the things they wanted them to say, and do the things they wanted them to do. And they built protections against it.
I do not think that means what you think it means.
I took my car to the mechanic. Several bolts on several parts were loose. He told me "In order to fix all these problems, you have to turn to the right." Deliberate or not, it was effectively also a case against Leftists and their ability to fix anything.
marco lost me at the god connection. also happens to be one of the most used forces by what you call common-good republicans. they are trumpets.
Yeah, but in this context it's easily interchangeable with natural rights. But when they start quoting scripture, especially Old Testament and the Wrath of God, or Revelations I'm out.
He didn't do that, did he?
In this context, God was where natural rights came from. He's channeling the views of people -- some quire remarkable natural philosophers -- 250 years ago.
"We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal, and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights." Jefferson wasn't preaching, he simply used "their creator" because they were all christian men who equated god to nature and "natural right" or "god given right" was the same to them.
They can go overboard, and I'm not a fan of religion in politics. But Rubio made a good point here and did it well.
How about a law that protects Good Samaritans who block and screen offensive material?
You get to define "offensive", of course. Cultural conservatives are blind to the fact that most of their moral beliefs aren't shared by reasonable Americans.
As long as you think that your morality is the only valid belief system, you are part of the problem.
Right Agreed. I am all for most conservative values, but what God means for many scares me to death. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Preamble to the Declaration of Independence
Notice it did not say God but Creator The Declaration was about explaining to the world why America was rebelling. The Declaration calls upon a non-sectarian concept of divinity to support rights set forth as unalienable, with liberty as inviolable. The phrase “laws of nature and of nature’s god” is associated with eighteenth century deism, a “rather vague Enlightenment-era belief . . . in a Creator whose divine handiwork was evident in the wonders of nature” but not “a personal God who interceded directly in the daily affairs of mankind.
Because so many people have not read the Constitution, they may be surprised to learn the word “God” is not used in the US Constitution either, along it is in so many of States constitutions.
Strumpets too...
There was Jefferson's phrase .... the laws of nature and of nature's God .... which precedes endowed by their Creator...* That's inclusive of those who believe in deities and those of us who are skeptical of the supernatural. Writing a political document in 1776 without a nod to people's superstitions on this point would have been a complete non-starter. Florida in 2022 on front of activist conservatives? Even moreso.
* https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp
Trouble is, I can't tell what "strong leader" means. As far as I can tell, people saying a leader is "strong" are referring primarily to how politicians deal with other politicians. That says nothing about how they deal with the rest of us. Yet I have the sense that people using this terminology do have something in mind about the contents of public policy, i.e. how they think such a leader wants to deal with the rest of us. But I don't think they have the same things in mind. It's frustrating.
Political power is the time derivative of the capacity to kill people. All advocates of coercion are recommending exactly that as a universal panacea made respectable by the ethics of altruism. Lookit how well it served I.G. Farben at their Buna rubber factory named Auschwitz.
Dude said Trump had a small dick to his face on national TV. Respect.
Yeah, uh, respect for a loser, I guess.
Not a fan of Rocky?
I was going to point out that Rocky worked hard, put up a good fight, and took some actual risk while Marco just called people names and lost but saying it out loud, I can understand how you would respect that. At least if he'd gotten to the point where he told Hillary Clinton she had a small dick he'd incur the marginal risk of losing an election and suiciding in federal custody.
I’m sure you are. You probably want Stallone and Carl Weathers to spitroast you.
Well the left doesn't have a strong leader but they haven't been the least bit shy about imposing full on tyranny for the last few years. Take a look at Australia, Canada, Whitmer, Cuomo, Newsome, NASB, Merrick Garland, Randi Weingarten, Twitter, Fauci, Facebook and thousands of other lesser dictators. These people destroyed life and liberty and they remain in power. But Reason is constantly selling us on the idea that some insignificant group of "conservatives" pose an existential threat to liberty. Reason is not dealing with the reality that is smacking them in the face every day.
Strong leaders aren’t tyrants. Weak ones are. It’s weak men who fail to command natural respect that resort to petty and more draconian approaches to controlling people.
Here's hoping people recognize threats to freedom when they come from self-proclaimed "Libertarians", like the LP and Reason.
We live in a world of real problems, and this is the kind of fertilizer that the get from the Republican party. There are real problems, like the deficit, trade, and the economy. There are things happening that are going to change the world and not for the better. But, the CINOs (conservatives in name only) are really worried about CRT and LGBTQ.
We don't need more conservatives or more progressives, we need more moderates who know what the real problems are.
Deficity spending doesn't work, keynsian economics doesn't work, globalism (unless both sides do not have tariffs/subsidizes or peg their currencies) doesn't work. And a society must have integrity, honesty, and virtue. CRT is marxism and should be attacked as anti-liberty. As for LGBTQ...the gay community should be very careful of the radical trans community that is advocating child abuse to push their agenda (hormone or surgery for a confused youngster being pushed to make some change that he/she should wait until they are an adult). Someone's sexual preference is their business but this stuff at the pre puberty level needs to be stopped. We see now the attempt by USA today of mainstreaming pedos...so a line has to be drawn
"CRT is marxism and should be attacked as anti-liberty."
Since when is treating people the same anti-liberty? Because that is what CRT asks us to do. It asks us to look at laws that however good intentioned effect minorities more harshly. This "CRT is marxism" crap is just another way to get out addressing the real issues we face.
Anything cultural conservatives don't like is Marxism. Because the coercive Christianity crowd is incapable of understanding the distinction between cultural topics and financial ones.
Marxism bad + cultural moderates bad = any cultural moderation is Marxism )pr socialism or Communism).
CRT is specifically NOT treating people the same. It's saying that white people are inherently racist (because they have white privilege and therefore benefit from racism) and Black people can't be racist. CRT also advances the idea that any disparity is the result of present racism, which simply isn't correct. There is a disparity in police shootings where black men are more than 18 times more likely to be killed than another group? Is that racism? Note: trick question.
Cultural behavior is the greatest driver of differing outcomes. Over generations you can see major differences between tribes.
Your comment shows that you are clueless about what CRT is. It is an ignorance that is shared by pretty much everyone in right wing media.
CRT is a way of examining history. It's a flawed and weak theory, in my opinion, but it isn't what the Perpetual Outrage and Grievance Machine says it is.
Working in a place that is up to its eyeballs with the application of CRT (whatever they call it), it's ALL about grievance and outrage.
"Equity" is just another word for "balancing old scores", and is about as wise a policy as the perpetual tit-for-tat that most savage tribes engage in.
I'm sure your company uses an egghead academic theory used to assess history as corporate policy. They also power their company with the laughter of children.
You're just making my point that you have no clue what CRT actually is.
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/
I suppose those trained to push CRT to schoolchildren or through HR indoctrination in business may well be unaware of the Marxist roots of the Crits, but this rat has been moving through the snake of the EduBlob for almost a century.
One doesn't need CRT to teach truths about the introduction of slavery and racialism to the European colonies in the Western Hemisphere, and their presence in what would be the USA. I went to high school and college in the 1970s and 1980s and certainly heard and read plenty about that on my way to a History BA. Those truths need not be taught from planted Marxist assumptions.
You're probably one of those credulous rubes who believes that CRT is taught in schools.
Like murder and assault?
Translation: There are no absolutes. We need to listen to conservatives who way "we" need more eugenic coercion and progressive collectivists who say "we" need to eliminate non-collectivized rights. Then "we" moderates can agree, as in 1933 Germany, on totalitarian "freedom is slavery" policies.
"progressive collectivists who say "we" need to eliminate non-collectivized rights"
^^^ THIS +1000000000000000 perfect....
Nazi Sales line every-time..... Sell your soul to the [WE] foundation; because you don't own you, [WE] own you.
We want you deviants to leave our kids alone. And teaching children racial hatred and telling white kids that they’re evil is vile bullshit. Ideally you rotten fucks would just GTFO and never come back.
Another "left libertarian" worried about States putting restrictions on abortions while the left puts us into tribes under equity ideology, actively discriminates based on said tribe and decided the Bill of Rights is "White Supremacy". Which is what the Wapo just published recently. You need to focus on the real threat..the takeover of our govt, media, entertainment, big tech, wall street by bolshevik types.
Liberty must trump over diversity and equity or we lose the country. Get with the problem or join some "climate change" latte sipping NYC panic stricken, covid fearing yoga class.
So Pollo here defines liberty as men with guns chasing escaped pregnant women from ice-floe to ice-floe to coerce them into labor as involuntary servitude to squeeze out cannon fodder? An elected German leader at least struck medals to give the coerced dams. Republicans insist that's freedom. So let's instead focus on something that isn't...
Yes, we know how much you’ve fetishized infanticide.
Will-to-Power Conservatives or "common good" Conservatism is something the writer makes us and another TDS sham. Libertarians don't like Trump as he doesn't adhere to all Government is bad and the less is the best approach. That approach would be great in a vacuum where there are no other countries like China, Turkey, Russia, or the EU who all play on the weak and go along with Presidents to put the US at a disadvantage. Biden is the worst of all even with rhetoric flying the US is getting eaten for lunch.
The writer just makes up a new Republican based on some writers who only one makes his point and the other American Greatness states no such thing. She does say as Tump does to fight and not be meek. I denounce the article as pure fiction and another word salad of nonsense that is not what America First is about at all. Trump did not command from Authoritarian Gavel but let the Republicans move with their own legislation. Wish Reason would come out with the truth why they hate Trump rather than the smears and made-up word salads. Trump's time in office was peaceful and prosperous, and now with have failing wars, chaos, crashed DOW, and 70's inflation. Gee thanks for the support.
Translation: Orange Hitler and Jesus were both crucified for your sins.
"Common good" constitutionalism is a right wing response to the conclusion that left-wing living constitutionalists have successfully killed the rule of law in the US. That there's no going back.
So, they figure that if it's going to be the rule of men going forward, why not their men?
The way to beat it back is to convince people that the Constitution isn't lost for good. Any ideas on how to accomplish that?
Like most cultural conservatives, you aren't actually an originalist/Constitutionalist. You just support a different judicial activism.
If you are for forcing others to live their lives by your moral and cultural beliefs, you don't actually support the Constitution or the principles it advocates.
How about a 25-point Positive Christianity program couched in THE COMMON GOOD BEFORE THE INDIVIDUAL GOOD, followed by an "Enabling" Law To Remedy The Distress of the People and The Republicans, permitting Laws that may deviate from the Constitution (confiscating your mescalin, money home and guns) and making sure that 3/4 of the Supreme Court obeys the same religion Hitler was brought up in? The alternative involves voting Libertarian to restore individual rights through peaceful spoiler vote clout.
Meanwhile, the GOP - and especially in Rubio's home state - are making it harder to vote, making civil protesters responsible if some of them run amuck, clamping down on free speech in schools, and mandating top down restrictions on local governments by the state legislature.
Rubio is a bull shit artist and personal and political coward who will hopefully be dumped by Val Demmings, the ex-Chief of the Orlando Police Department.
Yeah right, it’s so fucking hard to vote. Are you gong to trot out that old canard about 25% of blacks aren’t able to get picture ID?
Stephanie outs herself with the meaningless left-or-right binary that mystical and state-worshipping socialists recite to obliterate the concept of libertarian individualism. Neither Stephanie nor Rubio has a clue of how to define an individual right. Marco bluntly states the concept is the creation of a mythical superbeing whose existence and alleged utterances must be accepted on faith. Their Hitler program of "positive Christianity" is clearly described in The Darkening Age, by Catherine Nixey, and by the late Fuhrer's own platform and performance.
I've never met or heard someone refer to themselves as a Conservative that advocates leftist style state power, but as you hear from myself and many others here, govt has to use power to defend what Rubio described. Otherwise, authoritarians will take that system away and we'll be just like the rest of the unfree world.
Believing in freedom and limited govt doesn't mean you have to commit suicide when a popular movement against freedom and limited govt emerges.