If Moldova Can Welcome Ukrainian Refugees, the U.S. Can Too
Europe's poorest country is stepping up to help Ukrainians. Time for the U.S. to do the same.
After building up a troop presence on the Ukrainian border in recent months, Russia has launched an invasion of Ukraine. Today, Russian forces began carrying out strikes on major cities and strategic locations across Ukraine. The chaos has already prompted an exodus of Ukrainian citizens. Scenes from Kyiv show a flood of cars departing the capital city, and evacuees are already arriving in neighboring Poland, Romania, and Slovakia.
"We are ready to help all those who will be forced to leave Ukraine," said Polish Defense Minister Mariusz Blaszczak. "We could receive over 500,000 refugees," reported Romanian Defense Minister Vasile Dincu. "That is…the number for which we have prepared." Slovak Defense Minister Jaro Nad told Al Jazeera that his country was preparing for the potential "large numbers of refugees" coming to Slovakia.
One of the most enthusiastic helping hands has come from Moldova—Ukraine's southern neighbor and Europe's poorest country.
Moldovan President Maia Sandu said that over 4,000 Ukrainians have already crossed into Moldova today and that the country's "borders are open for [Ukrainian] citizens who need safe transit or stay." Moldova is prepared to help fleeing Ukrainians "in their humanitarian needs," she expressed.
Much like Ukraine, Moldova gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 and has struggled since then economically. The two countries both face ongoing territorial provocations from Moscow—Ukraine with Crimea and the Donbas region, and Moldova with the Russia-backed separatist government in Transnistria. Though it has comparatively few resources to get the job done, Moldova is stepping up to welcome Ukrainians fleeing the conflict.
Ukraine's neighbors have a history of shared struggles against the Russian government and are home to large Ukrainian expatriate populations, making their willingness to help sensible. The United States may be geographically far-flung from the conflict in Ukraine, but its own Ukrainian population, desire to protect those oppressed by the Russian government, and humanitarian concerns should guide its policy toward fleeing Ukrainians.
The U.S. has long accepted Ukrainians fleeing difficulties at home, accepting them consistently and in large numbers since the late 1870s. Ukrainians have flourished in communities across America. More than 1 million Ukrainians live in the U.S. and many have relatives in their ailing motherland they theoretically could sponsor for family-based visas. But the American immigration system is severely backlogged, keeping these and many other vulnerable people around the world in danger. Wary of direct military involvement on Ukraine's part, the Biden administration should concentrate its efforts on providing effective and speedy escapes to Ukrainians fleeing danger and protecting them from removal once they arrive here.
Countries with far fewer resources than the U.S. are gladly opening their doors to Ukrainians in their time of need. The fate of Ukraine is unwritten, and the brutal scenes emerging from the country could very well worsen. As citizens flee the Russian invasion, the U.S. should step up as Ukraine's neighbors have.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Please, Reason.com, keep running the same pro-open-borders column for as long as this crisis (which is entirely Drumpf's fault BTW) exists.
#OpenTheBordersToHelpCharlesKoch
#ImmigrationAboveAll
Cry more about it, pussy.
Psst. Parody.
His slack-jawed snake-handling yokel that is perpetually aggrieved persona doing a parody of the mythical 'cosmotarian' that lives in his head is a parody of a parody?
Profound as a Zen koan.
It’s deeper than you know.
Not really.
Better get that little green-eyed monster off your shoulder, he's whispering sweet nothings in your ear.
Attempts to modify immigration policy (which is partially about foreign policy) for ONLY military conflicts/reasons constitutes interventionism if only low level
The U.S. would have to make this offering permanent or part of another reason,.
Stay and fight. Pussies.
I am sure Fiona-Shikha has sent her personal savings to fund refugee camps, and is ready to vacate her apartment to provide housing in anticipation of the next wave of Ukrainians. As a libertarian writer I know she is not recommending that others be forced to support her cause.
Cry more about it, pussy.
Jeff's new account?
That's an old name. Maybe someone hijacked it.
No. An OG slumming to remind myself what a shithole this place has become.
Ahh. Someone who didn't take any time to learn idealism is best left in high school. That there are actually externalities that have to be considered with sophomoric positions. let me guess. You live in a 95% lily white district without negative externalities of mass migration like most of the left libertarians here?
Don’t forget the guarded gate.
Kill yourself instead.
Did you suffer a traumatic brain injury? If not, you aren’t HM.
Not HM. I was so happy that he retuned after all this time, only to see that it’s an asshole and an impostor.
That’s life.
At least it's more consistent than the rest of the globohomo "open society" crowd, even if it's a one-trick pony. Fiona's doesn't care where they come from, she honestly believes the US can take in the world's entire population of nearly 8 billion with no negative effects at all.
The rest of them? "Displaced people from war-torn Europe? Forget it! Displaced people from Third-World Shitholia? Come on in!"
And Moldova can make them honorary members of their national reserve forces, just in case.
Like a broken record. Every single time. The same fucking response to every war that breaks out in every corner of the globe.
Maybe try actually coming with an original thought once every 20 years or so.
Cry more about it, pussy.
Can you explain why we owe Ukraine --- or anybody else ---- anything? Certainly is not OUR problem and I, personally, feel no obligation to do much of anything.
Maybe Europe, for a change, can fix its own problems?
They have no incentive to solve their own problems as long as they have uncle sugar daddy.
Curse your dick-sucking whore mother for not using the coat hanger.
It's also only been like 2 days since she wrote essentially the exact same article. You'd think she'd be able to change it up more than just adding that some other country is doing this, so the US should too.
Does Fiona advocate sending south American immigrants to moldova?
Why isn't she advocating for the Ukrainians to move to South America? Surely they're running out of people by now, and the Ukrainians would surely love to hang out some place warmer...
How does Moldova feel about taking some Central American "refugees"?
I don’t think anyone from Central America would willingly move there.
If they see the women (and sample the wine) they'll change their minds.
Wait until the Ds figure out that conservative values resonate with eastern European populations. Suddenly, taking in refugees will be something the US can't focus on.
I think they already know that.
Miss, do you realize that this sort of activity on your part is every bit as vile as the blood dancing that the gun banners engage in every time there's a shooting?
Using a crisis to push an agenda just makes you look like a piece of shit.
Sounds perfect. Refugee aid cash would go much further there and the refugees could easily travel home if they want to and I'll assume without checking that Moldova is somewhat similar in culture and has a Ukrainian expat community. Why should the US take those valuable refugees away from friendly Molodova?
Moldova is not that similar to Ukraine. You are already crossing the line, transitioning from Eastern Europe to the Balkans (culturally speaking). Despite intensive ethnic cleansing and forced cultural norms from the Soviets, more and more Moldovans are visiting and studying in Romania (the motherland) and are reverting back to their old, Ottoman ways.
If Moldova Can Welcome Ukrainian Refugees, the U.S. Can Too
Well that went EXACTLY as I predicted it would in the last article of this nature. Are we going to send ships to pick them up and bring them here? Have we asked any of the Ukrainians if they're interested in stopping at a country an ocean away?
And in five years we can open our doors to refugees from Poland, Romania, Slovakia, or Moldova when Russia invades one of them.
Why can't they just go to Canada?
Can we send the MAGA Caucus to Moldova…?
OK, so maybe the average Ukrainian hasn't read any Dr. Kendi books. I'm still confident Reason.com's billionaire benefactor Charles Koch would find their labor more cost-effective than hiring US-born workers.
#CheapLaborAboveAll
Hang on a sec....I'm thinking single Ukrainian females 18-35 are Ok to let in. 😉
Shouldn't you be on your way to enlist in the Azov Battalion or something?
Is that a war hammer 40k thing?
No fat chicks.
It will no doubt be very painful to hear that your favorite bogeyman is not quite as demonic as you need to believe but Koch Industries is unionized.