NYC Mayor Adams Wants More Facial Recognition Software for Cops
Facial recognition software can secretly surveil and is subject to error.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams wants to expand law enforcement's use of facial recognition software in an effort to combat his city's growing gun violence. Experts say the software can violate privacy and civil liberties with its secret surveillance and propensity for inaccuracy.
"We will…move forward on using the latest technology to identify problems, follow up on leads, and collect evidence. From facial recognition technology to new tools that can spot those carrying weapons, we will use every available method to keep our people safe," said Adams in a press release addressing his plan last month. He also calls for it in his Blueprint to End Gun Violence.
The New York Police Department (NYPD) uses facial recognition software to match photos with those in its mugshot database. The NYPD also uses images scraped from social media. It then uses these images to track someone with its 15,000 cameras placed throughout the city, numbers documented in an Amnesty International report warning about the invasiveness of the program.
Michael Sisitzky, senior policy counsel at the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) in tells Reason that New York's current surveillance operations can already track who goes where and when. He says spying would only be made worse with more facial recognition software, with the surveillance technology likely targeting minorities. He cites the government report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which said most facial recognition software misidentified Asians or African Americans 10 to 100 times more compared to white faces. Sisitzky says that facial recognition software may then misidentify minority suspects, leading police to target innocent people.
"The NYPD already disproportionately targets African Americans, and coupling that with facial recognition software would be bad," says Sisitzky. In Detroit, Robert Williams was arrested after facial recognition software misidentified him as a different man sought for shoplifting watches. The software that the Detroit police "caught" Williams with was provided by DataWorks Plus, the same company that provides facial recognition software to the NYPD.
Surveillance experts also said facial recognition software may be inaccurate or manipulated. Jameson Spivack, a policy associate at Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy & Technology, a legal research group studying surveillance, says that matching technology does not provide positive identification for a face. Instead, it assigns a probability of how much a face matches another. Spivack also said errors occur and that the software can mistake two different faces as matching or it could mistake the same face in two separate photos as not matching.
Spivack says that the current methods the NYPD uses are unscientific. He cites a Center on Privacy & Technology public records analysis that found the NYPD would sometimes photoshop images or upload celebrity photos to find matches. In one such instance, the cops thought a suspect on a security camera photo resembled actor Woody Harrelson. So when they could not find a match with the suspect's security footage photo, they uploaded one of Harrelson instead. When the software turned up matches for the actor, the police identified and arrested one of the matches that they thought resembled the suspect from the security cam footage.
"What's concerning is that the face recognition algorithm returned him as a possible match when the photo that they submitted was not him. It was Woody Harrelson," said Spivack.
Privacy and Technology Strategist Daniel Schwarz at the NYCLU said that his organization endorsed a new bill in New York State that would prohibit law enforcement from using biometric surveillance, including facial recognition software, to track people, citing civil liberty and privacy concerns. Sisitzky says local governments in San Francisco, Oakland, and Seattle banned facial recognition software, so there is reason to believe New York State can as well.
This post has been updated to correct the name of the organization Sisitzky and Schwarz belong to.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This would be an excellent time to drop mask mandates.
Hell, my phone doesn't recognize my own face if I trim my beard, low lighting or not dead-center. I only have one face and it can't adapt. The question is whether the NYPD software feeds back false negatives or false positives. Either way, it's dangerous.
In 2022 many people are now joining online jobs very fast because it has potential. HJk i joined this 3 months ago and in 3 months I totally received $50743 and all I was doing is copy and paste stuff in my part time. Join now and start making money from
This website: ....... http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
Like the drug dogs, it will do whatever is asked of it.
"What's concerning is that the face recognition algorithm returned him as a possible match when the photo that they submitted was not him. It was Woody Harrelson," said Spivack.
So... works about as well as your average self-driving car.
Just wait until they have AI autonomous cop-droids.
"Comply, citizen -- you are a 99% match for a known fugitive...."
"Close" counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, and now in facial recognition software. I'm just waiting to hear the legal argument being extended to "our computer thinks so" and therefore, computer-generated warrants. Saves time and in worst-case scenarios, you can always blame it on a technical malfunction.
No reason why the computer can't just take over the car the next time the "suspect" is going somewhere, lock the doors, and take him to the nearest police station.
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail …. http://rb.gy/u603ti
In one such instance, the cops thought a suspect on a security camera photo resembled actor Woody Harrelson. So when they could not find a match with the suspect's security footage photo, they uploaded one of Harrelson instead. When the software turned up matches for the actor, the police identified and arrested one of the matches that they thought resembled the suspect from the security cam footage.
Fuckin' cops. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall during that exchange.
Wha'does he look like?
I dunno... Woody Harrleson I guess?
Throw Harrelson into the database and see how many matches we get.
Later in front of the press:
Police chief: We have made an arrest. We have very sophisticated AI technology that helped in this case.
I had some tempered high hopes for this new Mayor with his campaign talk and police background. Between this and his "new tools that can spot those carrying weapons", NYC isn't going to improve any, and that's a bar that wouldn't take much to get over after DeBlasio. Something tells me that their new tools are not something I'm going to approve of either.
According to the article this is bad because minorities and inequality. Does that mean the privacy doesn't matter if they iron out the kinks in the software?
As long as there's equity.
No, according to the article, this is bad - and it's worse because minorities and inequality. The article makes clear that there are two separate issues that make it worse for minorities. One is that the algorithms are less well-trained (the kinks in the software you describe). The other is that like gun control laws generally, it is disproportionately targeted against minorities. But even if the software was perfect and even if it was only used in completely white-bread communities, it would still be bad.
If you're going to snipe at the article, at least snipe at what it's actually saying and not at your strawman version of it.
Take a sedative, dude. My post was responding to a common theme which is that "minorities worst hit" implies the government action wouldn't be wrong if all races were hit equally. I know it's not the intent of the complainers to say, for example, "cops killing more white people would be an improvement because the killings would be more equal across races" because what they want is cops killing fewer black people, but that's where the logic leads. I'm sorry I offended you. Jeez.
You may have actually stumbled onto the only thing that keeps these fascists from implementing the software. Any photographer can tell you why it's harder to photograph black people under less than ideal conditions. If lack of equity is a deal-breaker and you can't achieve equity, then you don't have a deal.
When you're hung with your own noose on your own tree.
New NYPD motto:
Fuck you and anyone that looks like you.
NYC Mayor Adams Wants More Facial Recognition Software for Cops
I usually recognize them by their matching uniforms.
Oh, COVID is apparently over. States are no longer listening to Federal Officials because reasons.
Because it is the start of campaign season, nothing more or less. I've said it since October that early to mid-February was when Democrats would have an epiphany about restrictions and magically come to the conclusion that it's done. By the time Biden hits the podium for his State of the Union, he will have it too. I'll also take long odds that one of his first two sentences in that speech will be claiming that he kicked its ass. And the crowd will roar and rip off their masks in triumph.
would "dude looks like Woody Harrelson" suffice for a warrant?
*checks Harrelson's politics*
No.
NOw I'm curious, but too lazy to look it up, what are harrelson's politics?
Oftentimes, when I don't know what an actor's politics are, that tells you what their politics are.
went to jail for a ganja seed. wears weed pants on Curb. total hero.
Wait, is "Stoner" a political tribe now?
Yeah. They call themselves Libertarians. And like stoners they accomplish nothing.
Occupied the golden gate bridge, arrested for blocking intersections in SF during a "bike protest".
Was he protesting the bikes blocking traffic?
The liberal elites have somehow convinced their base that they are the nice guys. It's kind of amazing to watch.
Trump passes an utterly toothless EO declaring that the Social Media Companies need to KEEP the Wild West Online" and he's "literally hitler".
I have noticed that many people have different problems with software development. I had the same problem with this and I wanted to solve this problem as soon as possible. To solve this problem, I decided to surf the internet and found software development services company that helped me get permission. So I have the opportunity to share this with you, and I'm happy with it. In addition, you can visit his website and learn more about this company.
A huge number of people around the world are engaged in development, they also need to understand this topic. A few moments later, I wanted to create or rebuild some software for my application in my business. So I found an outsourcing software development ukraine company that helped me with this problem and created an application for me on different platforms. In addition, specialists there have the opportunity to run your software and applications.