Pennsylvania's Fuel Tax Is Supposed To Fund Bridge Repair. Billions Went to Cops Instead.
Pennsylvania has one of the nation's highest gas taxes, but those user fees haven't helped fix the state's poor roads and bridges.

Pittsburgh's Fern Hollow Bridge, which collapsed on Friday morning just hours before President Joe Biden visited the city to tout the passage of a $1.2 trillion federal funding package, provides an apt lesson about the real problem stalking America's infrastructure.
It's not a lack of money; it's too much politics.
That's not the lesson Biden offered, of course. Speaking later on Friday near the collapsed bridge, Biden said it was all about the money. "This is the first time in the country's history we dedicated a national program to repair and upgrade bridges—and it's about time," Biden said, before promising that the recently passed bipartisan infrastructure package would provide enough funding to fix all of America's 43,000 structurally deficient bridges. "We're sending the money," he said.
That's somewhat dubious—the Fern Hollow Bridge had been rated in "poor condition" for years, but it was not on the list of projects due to be funded by the new infrastructure bill.
But the more serious issue here has nothing to do with the size of Biden's infrastructure package. It has to do with poor budgeting and decision making by state and local governments, which are responsible for most roads and bridges in America.
Pennsylvania is a perfect example. Drivers in the state pay the nation's third-highest gasoline tax (a tad over $0.58 cents per gallon), yet Pennsylvania's roads are notorious for being in terrible shape and the state has the second-most structurally deficient bridges in the country.
How is that possible? Probably because state officials have done a poor job of setting priorities. A 2019 audit found that $4.2 billion in gas tax revenue which could have been used to repair roads and bridges had been siphoned off over six years to fund the state police.
"There's an inherent deal," state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale told WHYY, a Philadelphia-based public radio station, at the time. "You're going to have this high gas tax, but it's going to go to fund roads and bridges. And now when they find out it's not happening, I think that gets people upset."
That's a lot of money that wasn't used in the intended manner. The New York Times reported this week that fixing all the structural issues with bridges in Pittsburgh would cost an estimated $458 million—a big price tag, but only about one-tenth of what the state redirected toward the state police in the years before DePasquale's audit.
The city of Pittsburgh is guilty too. As Randal O'Toole points out in his Antiplanner blog, the city's Department of Mobility and Infrastructure has spent about $6 million annually on bridge repair and maintenance projects over the past five years. But it has spent, on average, more than $8 million annually on so-called "complete streets" projects—like bike lanes, sidewalks, beautification projects, and the like.
"The 2017 inspection of the Fern Hollow bridge estimated that restoring the bridge to good condition would cost $1.5 million," O'Toole notes. "Instead of fixing it, the city spent more than $1.3 million in bike-sharing last year."
But you won't hear that from the infrastructure experts and politicians being quoted in the aftermath of another preventable near-tragedy. For them, it's always about needing more money. "Ultimately, it's a resource problem," Kent Harries, an engineering professor at the University of Pittsburgh, told TribLive. "I hope it's a wake-up call to the nation that we need to make these infrastructure investments," Lt. Gov. John Fetterman told a local radio station from the scene of the collapse.
Ultimately, the federal infrastructure package suffers from the same sort of misplaced priorities. Yes, there is $40 billion for bridge projects. But Biden's much-ballyhooed spending plan will direct $156 billion to mass transit agencies, $40 billion for green energy grants (think Solyndra), and $48 billion to subsidize public broadband to compete with existing internet providers, and $7.5 billion for electric vehicle charging stations. As nice as items like that might be, every dollar spent on them is a dollar that can't be used to prevent the next bridge collapse.
As always, effective governance is mostly a matter of budgeting well—and budgeting is really nothing more than priority setting, given that public resources are not unlimited. Pennsylvania has done a poor job of setting priorities, as the sorry state of the state's roads and bridges can attest. More federal money for infrastructure won't address that underlying problem.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Pennsylvania is a state that has an 18% liquor tax imposed in the 30's as a 'temporary' measure to provide relief to a town that had been damaged by flooding. Okay, it started as a 10% tax, it was raised to 18% in the 60's.
Search 'Johnstown Flood Tax'.
Yeah, it's notorious. It's kept because it gives the Liquor Control Board an excuse to exist because they give that revenue to the general budget as a "profit" from liquor sales.
Earn income while simply working online. work from home whenever you want. just for maximum 5 hours a day you can make more than $600 per day online. (hj02) From this i made $18000 last month in my spare time.
Check info here:- ==>> http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
Classic.
Rural interests - mostly GOP legislators - have opposed the idea that municipalities that don't have their own police forces should have to pay for protection by the State police. This is one "free ride" that is used to excuse the fact that a large percentage of PA Turnpike tolls have been siphoned off to provide transit operations in the large cities. Rural, suburban, urban interests all fight to "take back" what they perceive has been taxed from them to subsidize others.
The fact that we have 2,600 municipalities doesn't help, either.
The Ds in the state House always bring up a bill to charge municipalities for state police services, but the GOP opposes it and some of the rural Ds do as well. Although the number of rural pro-union, pro-life, pro-gun D districs that we used to have are turning red.
You have that exactly backwards.
How?
If the high tax is keeping some PA drivers off the road, it is doing the rest of us a favor.
We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. Or not, in this case.
This is because funding for the state police was taken off the general fund budget a decade ago to balance the budget during the recession.
It was a joint Republican/Democrat cowardice that neither party wants to change because it would require a tax increase to fund, which the GOP, especially, fears deeply.
It doesn’t require a tax increase, it just requires cuts somewhere else. Like bike lanes, green energy, public transit, universities, etc.
That's the first time I've heard the name of the bridge. I used to live in Fern Hollow!
We all know what the solution is: more taxes!
They always want more. It's never enough and never will be.
First Law: More.
Second Law: Shut up and see First Law.
Wow, the infrastructure is literally crumbling now.
Who was in charge of making sure it didn't crumble?
Better give them another trillion dollars or so.
>>which collapsed on Friday morning just hours before President Joe Biden visited
cue the Church Lady
Rather disappointing article. It’s a good point that politics gets in the way of spending decisions but this guy is trying to claim it’s all the democrats fault, ignoring that Republicans are often behind these dumb ideas. You don’t solve this by being partisan.
funny, i didn't see any attempt to pin this on one party or the other.....
The Kleptocracy is bipartisan, unlike those selfish libertarians who raise such a stink about a few extrajudicial killings now and then. Those are what put teeth into God's Own Prohibition laws. Remember that when looters tell you a historically-recorded vote for freedom from coercion is a "wasted" vote.
No, he claimed it’s all government’s fault.
The fact that this government is overwhelmingly Democratic is your (correct) inference.
Ultimately, the federal infrastructure package suffers from the same sort of misplaced priorities.
Yes, like thinking local projects, require the federal taxpayers living outside those localities to pay, at least in part, for the construction, maintenance and upkeep of those local projects.
To be fair, I thought the infrastructure package actually didn't contain much of that sort of thing. Infratructure is the IRS snooping on your bank account or requiring cars to have anti-drunk-driving ignition lockouts.
Excuse a silly question, but regarding this bridge fiasco, and so many other things, Where Is The Salami Hidden? Obvious answer, at least it so seems to me, in the halls of government.
Have the campaign hats that adorn State Police heads gotten that expensive?
Muh roads!
This is one reason why we call them pigs.
We had a similar proposal in my podunk town but at least it was honest: raise the sales tax by a percent to give "needed" raises to the pork. I linked the pages on "Transparent California" showing the two and three hundred thousand buck "compensation packages" those jokers are knocking back, and posted it on the Craigslist and Nextdoor sites for our area. The first time, it took a day for the honest truth to get them removed, the second: a few hours. From then on, it was minutes. I'm lucky that the filth didn't come kicking down my door for the crime of wanting to remove the caviar and filet minion from their trough. The scum probably would have if they could have found me.
I can't find it now, but I distinctly remember reading an article somewhere that sought to explain why Pennsylvania has such terrible roads.
The author claimed that the reason was Pennsylvania had some of the least-traveled roads in the country----meaning that the average mile of road in Pennsylvania saw fewer vehicles over a unit of time than almost any other state. At first blush you would think that was a good thing, because the roads would be subject to less wear and tear. However, it was explained that is not the case, as much of the wear and tear on roads comes from the natural freeze-thaw cycle that happens regardless of whether 1 car, 10 cars, or a hundred cars transit any given length of road.
Essentially the author posited that Penna has too many miles of roads to maintain. The author claimed that this was because the decisions regarding what roads would be constructed ("We need a road from Point A to Point B") was, in Penna, almost exclusively decided by politics rather than by road planners and engineers.
They have a tendency to build a new road to bypass an old one, then maintain both for thru traffic.
That could have a lot do do with Pennsylvania geology. Parallel mountain ridges tend to chop the state up into sub-regions, and preclude efficient transit between them. Want to get to a town 4 miles away on the other side of a ridge? It can be a 60-mile drive to do it.
"Billions went to cops instead." Gawrsh, whut a surprise! So asset-forfeiture funds and finances a coercive looter state with SS troops protected from all immunity by politicians who "shall not be questioned." How novel!
Pittsburgh is notorious for wasting money on stupid stuff. Just walk around the city and see how many roads and bridges are in disastrous condition while the spend millions on ‘beautification’ projects the just cover up the pending disasters.
We pay high taxes, we pay utilities, but we need trillions in additional infrastructure spending?!?
PA has become a left-wing union machine that re-gerrymanders in the name of "fairness" when things don't go left. i.e., Connor Lamb was NOT fairly elected. Casinos were supposed to lower property taxes, and it didn't happen. 3rd highest gas taxes in the country and a pizza company is filling the potholes yet they're talking about more toll roads. Built a stadium nobody wanted while still in debt from the previous. etc. etc. this state is going the way of CT and IL. I just don't know why they won't lower taxes if they're going to take "infrastructure" bailouts from red states anyway.
"$0.58 cents per gallon"
Ummm....
That's just the state tax part.
The goings on at the state legislature are truly strange to behold.
Peduto in Pittsburgh, God, what a douche. I remember sitting in a taxi in downtown Pittsburgh at rush hour staring at the totally empty bike lanes that could have been moving car traffic efficiently.
Sat next to him at a dinner. Just wanted to smack his dumb face.