Tennessee School Board Pulls Maus From Eighth-Grade Curriculum
A grim sign of the bureaucratic mentality controlling public education

Art Spiegelman's once-controversial and now-canonical graphic memoir Maus has been removed from the McMinn County, Tennessee, school curriculum in a unanimous decision by the local Board of Education.
It was an unexpected irony for the news to hit this week, today being Holocaust Remembrance Day. Spiegelman's Pulitzer-winning book, with its enormous cultural impact and reader-friendliness, has been a, perhaps the, primary pop vehicle of such remembrance over the past few decades. Spiegelman's mother and father were both Auschwitz survivors, and Maus portrays him learning his parents' Holocaust experiences and retelling them—in a riff on classic animal-comics tropes—with Jews as mice and Nazis as cats.
The way McMinn County officials thought through the matter, as revealed by the minutes of their meeting, says a lot about how the public schools deal with serious matters of history and art.
The book was being taught to eighth graders as part of a unit on the Holocaust. A few people attending the meeting objected to the book's "rough, objectionable language," and they initially wanted to redact "eight curse words" and one graphic image. The complaints expanded from there, with board member Tony Allman seeming to believe that the horrors of the Holocaust should not be taught to schoolchildren in general. "Being in the schools, educators and stuff we don't need to enable or somewhat promote this stuff. It shows people hanging, it shows them killing kids, why does the educational system promote this kind of stuff, it is not wise or healthy," he opined in the halls of the McMinn County Center for Educational Excellence.
Allman also brought up obscure details of Spiegelman's career, noting with suspicion that the author who "created the artwork used to do the graphics for Playboy. You can look at his history, and we're letting him do graphics in books for students in elementary school. If I had a child in the eighth grade, this ain't happening. If I had to move him out and homeschool him or put him somewhere else, this is not happening."
Another board member, Steven Brady, explained that Maus is an important part of the eighth-grade curriculum: "Next year in high school, they are going to jump in the deep end on World War II….The thinking here is, here is the best place to give them a little introduction to the Holocaust and things that went on during World War II." Maus, he explained, is the "anchor text," taught with news stories, survivors' stories, and other supplemental materials. He added: "What we have done in anticipation of any of those concerns, we prepared a parent letter to go home to inform them of this topic we are about to study. We went ahead and took the step to censor that explicit content and we went ahead and made sure that all of our books are stamped 'property of MCS' so that if one does come up for some reason, hey look at these words we are teaching in school, no, that's not one of our books."
Board member Jonathan Pierce moved that Maus be removed from the curriculum, arguing that the violent words and actions portrayed would not be allowed on school grounds."The wording in this book is in direct conflict of some of our policies. If I said on the school bus that I was going to kill you, we would be bringing disciplinary action against that child." This bizarre argument shows a complete lack of understanding of the value of historical storytelling.
Lee Parkison, a teacher at the meeting, pointed out that Maus had been approved for use in schools on the state level in Tennessee, notwithstanding the eight words and one picture that raised concerns in McMinn County. The offensive image was not specifically identified in the minutes of the meeting, but it was probably a very vague and easy-to-miss drawing in a story-within-the-story of his human mother's topless dead body in a tub after she killed herself. (Another possible target: male cartoon mice shown nude in a shower in their death camp.) The discussion did not identify the eight forbidden words either, though it alludes to "bitch" and "goddamn." I noticed a "god damn" and a "hell" thumbing through the book this morning, but this book is not rife with harsh language that should shock an early teen.
Board member Mike Cochran felt that mixing Holocaust education with Maus's depiction of Spiegelman's mother's suicide decades after her camp experience, and the harsh language against his survivor father, was not necessary for schoolchildren. Cochran also noted two non-Maus examples from the school curriculum, a poem discussing kisses and ecstasy and a painting of a naked man riding a bull, to support his contention that "the entire curriculum is developed to normalize sexuality, normalize nudity, and normalize vulgar language. If I was trying to indoctrinate somebody's kids, this is how I would do it. You put this stuff just enough on the edges, so the parents don't catch it but the kids, they soak it in. I think we need to relook at the entire curriculum."
Members of the board also seemed to believe that adjusting the work to their preferences might lead to some copyright issues. This non-lawyer is not sure they are correct in assuming that a redacted-to-their-tastes version of Maus would break the law.
While the board insists it is not against teaching the Holocaust, one member admitted that if they can't find a good substitute to anchor the Holocaust module now that Maus has been jettisoned, "It would probably mean we would have to move on to another module."
The U.S. Holocaust Museum told The Washington Post that Maus "has been vital in educating students about the Holocaust through the detailed experiences of victims." Spiegelman himself told CNBC that "I've met so many young people who…have learned things from my book" and that something "very, very haywire" is happening in Tennessee.
Spiegelman's tireless efforts as a cultural ambassador for comics as an art form are a major reason why book-length comic books are considered appropriate for educational curricula to begin with. (Spiegelman's career and impact are discussed at length in my forthcoming book Dirty Pictures, a history of underground comix and its creators.) Schools used to dismiss comics as inconsequential, childish frippery; now, precisely because Maus is so intensely true to his parents' historical experiences, some schools are dismissing it for being all too consequential. This school board not only seriously considered the idea that works depicting violence should be seen as the same as actually threatening violence; it gave the side offering such arguments its unanimous assent. That's a grim sign of the mentality of the bureaucrats controlling public education.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Call me crazy, but I think the real problem is schools using comic books (in 8th grade, no less) to teach.
What's wrong with the Diary of Anne Frank?
One of the problems of today is that kids don't read, and schools using comic books instead of actual books is one of the reasons. It shouldn't be celebrated.
Wasn’t her book banned too?
" One of the problems of today is that kids don't read, and schools using comic books instead of actual books is one of the reasons. "
This is backwater Tennessee. If most of these students -- or their parents -- can read the big print on a cereal box, that cause for celebration. I surprised the schools waste money on books.
If anyone is an expert on living in backwaters, it's Arthur L. Hicklib.
Don't kid yourself, it isn't even an expert on that. It does specialize in ignorance and hypocrisy, so, typical left-leaning and progressive commenter.
No, he really did grow up as a poor redneck. That's why he overcompensates so hard.
“Math is racist” -democrats
"Democracy and accurate vote-counting violate The Sacred Will of The TrumptatorShit." - Trumpaloos
Stop eating shit, fuckbag.
So you're trying to claim that the left haven't called math "rAciSt"?
They've done that kind of crap. When did I ever say that they haven't? You hallucinating again?
Holy Cost Batman!!!
I can see using it as a reading assignment, but the "anchor text" for teaching was not the Holocaust that cannot be done without is a strange claim.
There was another underground talking-mouse comic in the 70s called Mickey Rat.
I read the minutes of the school board meeting (the link is somewhere below.) I'm not certain about this, but apparently Maus is part of an English curriculum.
If it were part of a History curriculum for eighth grade, I'd back it to the hilt. So it has some nasty parts. Well, history has some nasty parts, and the Holocaust was one of the nastiest. I've read Maus, and it highlights the impact on survivors of the camps that no dry history full of numbers and a picture of the "Arbeit macht Frei" arch at Auschwitz could ever do.
However, as an English assignment, a graphic novel is...strange. I feel strongly both ways about that. Speigelman used pictures to make his point, and words are largely secondary. English is about using words to make a point, and I'm not sure Maus does that in the way that the Diary of Anne Frank does.
Thank you for your comment. I was going to write that a graphic novel could easily fit into the curriculum in that it could easily present an issue in a work that required only a short read and that might actually be better remembered because it was accompanied by pictures. But you are correct, that seems a better fit for a History class.
Mind you, I think there is room for short stories in an English class so I won't entirely rule out a graphic novel.
Maus may not be appropriate for all eighth graders, but it's not off by much.
Getting kids to read ANY book not on their phone, is a victory. If they could read graffiti I'd be impressed.
Which version? The one she actually wrote or the one that was edited to take out her talk about masturbation, menstruation etc?
There were two versions written by Anne Frank herself, one the daily diary she kept and one she herself edited in 1944 to donate to a project on wartime diaries, known as Versions A and B in Dutch (totaling about 700 pages). After the war her father Otto Frank transcribed parts of both versions A & B in German for relatives in Switzerland who thought it ought to be published. The first publisher (Contact Publishing, Amsterdam, 25 Jun 1947) left out Anne's thoughts on her developing sexuality. In my not so humble opinion the public importance of the Diary of Anne Frank (Het Achterhuis, The Secret Annex) is the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands as experienced by a young Jewish girl, not the distractive sexology of a young girl's passage through puberty.
Correct. What a teen thinks about sexuality is irrelevant to the ultimate topic of the diary to its readers.
I may make a funny fart sound during my day, but it’s a pointless distraction in the grand scheme of things. Same with her naughty bits.
It is a graphic novel, not a comic book. There is a difference. Maus is an excellent depiction of the life of Holocaust survivors. Due to the strong emotions and topics in the book, 8th grade may be too young. My children had this in 10th grade and the two years of maturity at that age is significant. It was a positive learning tool for history we should never repeat.
I think that the age of 13-14 years old and up is plenty old enough to learn about the Holocaust and its consequences. I can see where pre-school and elementary school probably would be too young for such history, but I do think that from 7th and 8th grade on, is plenty old enough to start learning about such things.
Yes, the binding.
I started to read it in my dentist's waiting room, never finished. (Moved away, didn't continue with that dentist.) I didn't get to the depiction of Holocaust survivors part, but the part I did read was good enough to make me want to finish some day. It seems to be a comic book about its own making, one of those endless-mirrors setups, much like Seinfeld.
And it's on my mind now because I have an infestation of smart, vindictive mice.
It's a comic.
"What's wrong with the Diary of Anne Frank?"
TLDR?
I love Maus.
I own two copies and think it's not just a wonderful graphic novel but also great literature.
I think every adult everywhere should read it.
It's also definitely not for kids. It will fuck them up. They showed common sense by pulling it from the school library. There are better ways to teach kids about the Holocaust.
Let them discover it in high school and college instead.
Nonsense. I'm sure I saw worse stuff by the time I was in 8th grade. It won't 'fuck kids up'. Heck, I was reading holocaust-related material by 5th grade (non-fiction and fiction), and the non-fiction descriptions are almost certainly worse than Maus's cartoon depictions.
8th graders are teenagers. They'll literally be in high school the next school year. Don't infantilize them. They aren't little kids.
Hell, about 20% of the kids in my middle school would have made excellent Nazis.
What institutions are teaching children racism today, fucko?
Ones based on CRT.
Any that have adopted the 1619 project. Any that use race as a standard for achievement or selection. So, in truth, many.
They aren't little kids.
They are the perfect age to be indoctrinated. Presenting material that is age inappropriate is done intentionally for propagandizing.
Why? It terrifies kids. If it could happen to someone else's family, it could happen to their family. Note that they picked a story that focuses on the mistreatment of a mom. Most kids live with and love their mom. Nazis raped and killed moms.
They want kids fearful of and furious at the Nazis. It is important to insert here that the teachers purposefully represent the Nazis as 'far right' fascists and statists despite the designation of National Socialists and they always play up the Aryan supremacy. It's true, after all. That way when groups get called 'right' or 'racist', people previously exposed to the propaganda subconsciously associate them with Nazis and it rekindles that fear/fury response.
All of this despite the fact that the Soviets killed 3 x as many as the Nazis, and that the Chinese killed 4 x as many. Or that the Soviet army made a point of raping as many women as they possibly could when they took Poland and Germany specifically to demoralize the population. But, even as they go on to learn the real history, the Nazi hating propaganda is the stuff that sticks.
If you can't see the propaganda in presenting mother raping Nazis to 8th graders you are willfully ignorant. They walk out of class chanting 'Never Again', oblivious that the Soviets were allowed to do much worse for another 45 years and that the Chinese have 5 million in camps today. Meanwhile the unbiased press calls the Republican Party 'far right' and 'white supremacists while the Twitters and Facebooks call them Nazis without getting taken down.
Why not? Just as long as they are also exposed to books written about holocaust denial.
"Nonsense. I'm sure I saw worse stuff by the time I was in 8th grade. It won't 'fuck kids up'."
They're thirteen years old. What the fuck is wrong with you?
And Maus is darker than hell. They should read it when their emotionally mature enough to handle it.
"non-fiction descriptions are almost certainly worse than Maus's cartoon depictions."
Maus siezes you emotionally in a way clinical textbook definitions don't. That's what makes it so good, and such a valuable piece of holocaust literature.
That's also what makes it inappropriate for 13-year-olds.
Have you even read it? The mice, cats and pigs aren't Disney critters.
You are exactly right - they are 13 years old. Stop infantilizing them.
13 Year olds were well along their career as aspiring naval officers in the Age of Sail.
You think a dark comic book would fuck them up? How about getting your damn arm blown off in a broadside with a french ship, or leading a charge onto another ship (god damn, I loved Master and Commander!)
Yet somehow these kids made it through to become folks like Horatio Nelson.
I think Chuck's concerns about indoctrination are valid, but indoctrination can be done with or without these books, and this book is not solely used for indoctrination. If you are worried about indoctrination then fix that, banning one book ain't gonna do it.
It is not banned.
At all.
Not being required to read is not banning.
Speaking of indoctrination, who do you think indoctrinates children to hate this or that at an extremely young age? The parents, and their friends--that's who! Children learn prejudice and bias at a very young age. That being said, what's wrong with children learning about the Holocaust and other such horrors, and their consequences at a very young age?
So you too see the educational value of Speigelman showing his dead mother's naked body in a fit of Oedipal pique?
'tis but a flesh wound.
Not giving them grimdark comics to read isn't infantilizing them.
Kids learning the value of hard work and duty at thirteen is definitely not the same thing.
And cabin boys that were caught in battle were just as fucked up by war as anyone else. Kids in war isn't a good thing.
I have to agree. Maus is more appropriate for a high school course. I would put it on the same reading level as Night. which was assigned to me as a tenth grader.
So you're saying they're one year too young? Come on. Hardly 'traumatizing' at that point.
Lol. I read night in fifth grade, and it has a fancy picture section in the middle. Highly disturbing, but life is fucked up. The most disturbing part was seeing people that could have been my peers in it.
I have read it. It's on the shelf behind me as I type this.
13-year olds aren't children anymore. What the fuck is wrong with me? What the fuck is wrong with you. This desire to coddle young adults is a large part of why our society is so fucked up. If they're not emotionally mature enough, it's because helicopter parents are constantly looking over their shoulders.
Seriously, more traumatizing stuff gets done by middle schoolers to other middle schoolers than any visual they'll see in Maus.
"I'm sure I saw worse stuff by the time I was in 8th grade."
Yeah, but do we need it to be a ratchet where once you see a bad thing once you need to see it again and again - especially in a school setting where it's essentially forced on you?
History has a lot of ugly in it, because human nature has a lot of ugly in it. Are you saying we shouldn't teach the holocaust at all, because it's part of a 'ratchet' of 'bad things'?
I imagine most of the people arguing that Maus is inappropriate for teenagers (!) think nothing of the fact that millions of _young_ children get annually subjected to visual depictions and verbal descriptions of a man suffocating to death while hanging from a crucifix, and having a spear stuck in his side. That, however, couldn't possibly be traumatizing, right?
Are we to assume that it didn't fuck you up??
It wasn't pulled from theocracy. It was replaced in required reading.
The library*
And, as usual, the lie has circled the globe before the truth could even get its shoes on.
That's an opinion I was hoping to hear. I have no familiarity with the book, so the article had me under the impression that the parents and board were being a bunch of Karens. Without knowing it I have no clue of the educational value or how appropriate it is for any given age group.
It's hard for me to get upset about a comic that might be inappropriate being removed from the school curriculum. The highlighted objections do sound like weak reasons, but it would be par for the course for a Reason writer to misrepresent things.
Are writers unable to insert photos in their articles? A picture (or twitter screenshot) would be helpful when the source material can make its own case better than vague descriptions. I flipped out at the Dr. Seuss thing because all the people supporting the removal of those books had no clue what images they were objecting to and couldn't show me.
What purports to be the minutes of the meeting is available online. Here:
https://core-docs.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/1818370/Called_Meeting_Minutes_1-10-22.pdf
I oppose banning books. Full Stop. This wasn't that.
This was a question of whether or no to use the book as a core text in teaching the curriculum. The state makes it the school board's choice to use one of several to teach the holocaust, and there were clearly complaints about the process of its selection.
Ultimately, I recommend reading the minutes (something this article's author may, or may not, have done), and judging for yourself. You may still decide they are a bunch of incompetents, ignorant, and motivated by all sorts of wrong think - but I believe you will have a more nuanced view of their incompetence and ignorance. Certainly a more nuanced view of the story than what is being reported.
That was a great read.
I think everyone commenting on (or writing articles about) this decision should read these minutes first.
Oh, so once again a Reason writer has completely misrepresented what actually happened? Did Shikha ghost write this article?
What has happened to this publication? I didn't always agree with them two decades ago when I first started reading them, but I never suspected the journalistic integrity.
Never read Maus, didn't attend 8th grade either (skipped a grade, went straight from 7th grade to 9th grade), but the only Spiegelman I read at that age was when I snuck into the shop and got into my father's playboy stash.
He did that amusing, disembodied Ed Head comic for Playboy.
Tennessee is a shitty, half-educated, bigoted state (check the educational attainment rankings) . . . and McMinn County is the shitty, uneducated, bigoted part of Tennessee.
This can't-keep-up, slack-jawed backwater isn't even close enough to Chattanooga to be considered a suburb of that "city."
Not much harm of this. All of the smart, ambitious students will flee that shithole as soon as they complete high school, never to return. The morons who remain in McMinn County won't need education for the life they will live.
Ha, the cope in the slack-jawed, thumb-sucking, slope-foreheaded Hicklib's post is absolute nuclear-level.
I'm starting to think that slack-jawed backwater yokels are Kirkland's sexual fetish.
I’m pretty sure he is a lower class minimum wage working kook that works for a bus8ness owned by a conservative. Arty is simultaneously jealous and feels great hatred towards this person. He also likely lost out to conservative alpha makes his whole life. So he’s attracted to the far left because they reward unproductive failures like him.
And he comes to sites like this one to spew his venom, basically because he’s garbage and deep down he knows it. Furthering fueling his hatred. This has undoubtedly made him unbearable, and he has no friends and no one in his life.
Arty is the epitome of a loser.
Likely close to true. If one listens to the lies it tells about itself, its had three or so successful careers, has a family, made a shit ton of money, and so on. None of which rings true, since it is dishonest, ignorant, and immature at best.
“slack-jawed backwater”
Did you come up with that phrase all by your widdle self?
It’s projection. He can’t escape his redneck origins.
Kirkland, the worst among the Tennesseans is much less hateful and bigoted than you are.
One school board makes a shitty decision and you twist their motives and apply your bias to an entire state’s population. Classic bigot bullshit.
Considering on how they are focused on violence, I would almost be willing to bet that most of the school board actually belongs to the same side of the aisle as Kirkland.
It was an unexpected irony for the news to hit this week, today being Holocaust Remembrance Day.
The decision was made January 12th.
Books are replaced often in curriculum.
What a shit article.
The decision was made January 12, and the story hit the news on Holocaust remembrance day which is a pretty fucking shitty thing to do, making Holocaust remembrance day about this bullshit.
So Biden says he is going do break the law and do something completely illegal... but oh hey here's some rando republican in the middle of nowhere, look!
It is illegal and immoral to hire based on race or sex. It is literally against the Civil Rights act. And Biden says he is going to do that and all the fuck-tards applaud like the evil seals they are
It's probably not illegal; 42 U.S. Code § 2000e–16 doesn't seem to apply to positions which the President appoints.
But it's still telling.
I am more surprised that they haven't covered how he is trying to bumble us into a war with Russia. I've seen one article in two weeks on it.
This isn't like starting a war with a tinpot dictator in some shit hole 3rdworld country to boost your polls (or faking an incident to invade Canada to boost your polls, only to be thwarted by the fumblings fat guy patriot and a black guy who dreams of being in the NHL), this is upping the saber rattling against the second largest nuclear power in the world. I think that is far more pertinent than some school board voting to change the text of their Holocaust curriculum (according to the actual meeting minutes the book wasn't banned they just voted to use a different text, for stupid reasons).
Oliver North would have been a far better president than either Bushs or Clinton
"The wording in this book is in direct conflict of some of our policies. If I said on the school bus that I was going to kill you, we would be bringing disciplinary action against that child." This bizarre argument shows a complete lack of understanding of the value of historical storytelling.
----------------------------
This sounds remarkably close the Woke crowd's inability to distinguish between using the N-word and referring to other's use of the N-word. Another example of the pollical horseshoe? If you go far enough Right, you run smack into the far-Left (and vice-versa).
Based on the quotes I am not really sure if they were right wing Karens or left wing Karens. But also according to the link CarLitGuy provided of the actual meeting minutes, the author of this piece is really misrepresenting what happened. They didn't ban the book, they chose to use alternate text in 8th grade (turns out this was just one of many texts that the state recommends as a possibility to use). Their reasons for changing textbooks was stupid, but it wasn't a ban.
I guess I will have to buy a copy to see what the fuss is about.
It’s pretty good.
It sucks. It has no literary, historical, or art value.
It’s just meant to shock.
I find its depictions objectionable and worthless. I wouldn’t buy it or share it.
The history and stories of survivors of the Holocaust are meaningful and important. But as a fucking comic book? No. It trivializes what happened with shitty artwork.
“with its enormous cultural impact and reader-friendliness, has been a, perhaps the, primary pop vehicle of such remembrance over the past few decades.”
WTF does this have to do with the appropriateness of this book being part of 8th grade curriculum? Or does Doherty think this is really an issue other than that question?
I have never heard of this book until yesterday when the story made the national news. I am a huge WWII history buff (currently reading a non fiction book on the submarine war in the Pacific), one of my most impactful memories from childhood was we a senior for government we did a whole quarter on genocides through the ages (not just the Holocaust) and as part of it we visited the Synagogue in Spokane and listened to an actual Holocaust survivor tell us about her experience (she was sent to a work camp). So, I question exactly how impactful this graphic novel really was. Especially as my government teacher was kind of an old school hippie type (although he wasn't actually old enough to be an actual hippie) and was the kind who would have used material like this to spark debate. And I just googled it, it was serialized from 1980-1991, and I was a senior in 1994, so I hardly think that Mr. Veile would have not used if it was as culturally impactful as the author states. Mr. Veile, if you are reading this, know that even after 26 years, ten years in the Army, a marriage, three kids, one wartime deployment, your classes still impact me every day. Thank you.
BTW, as I noticed with a lot of the old school hippie types that lived in North Idaho, he and his wife became quite conservative as they got older.
If you have not read it let me suggest Admiral David Gallery's book on antisubmarine warfare in the Atlantic and the capture of the U505. If you want to talk about guts (courage may not be the right word here), then the guys that scrambled aboard a scuttled German u-boat to capture that boat have them in plenty.
These people are idiots but there are other pretty graphic autobiographies from the holocaust that can be used.
My kids both learned about it recently and I have never heard of Maus.
I have mixed feelings about this. My instinct is to take a critical approach and condemn the pulling of this book for oddball moralizing reasons that are ancillary to the book's larger message. We're playing a dangerous game here, and like so many other of these issues, I don't see an easy way out.
I wish I had read The Gulag Archipelago so I could speak from a position of deep knowledge, but from what I do know about it, I'd guess there's some pretty rough stuff that comes into the fray when reading that book.
The Mukilteo School Board in my state just pulled To Kill A Mockingbird from its required reading list because it uses some rough language which will hurt the ears of young students who are being taught to-- in a bizarre vein of anti-racism-- that racism never existed (See some modern historical movies and shows where black folks are portrayed as just another member of society-- LOOK THERE'S A BLACK MAYOR AND A BLACK POLICE CHIEF AND A BLACK FACTORY OWNER IN 1817! BECAUSE THAT'S HOW BLACK PEOPLE SHOULD BE PORTRAYED!!11! IT WAS JUST COMMONPLACE!).
I think that the ultimate mistake we continue to make is we keep trying to teach children what to think instead of how to think.
Yeah, I think there are some valid questions about the educational appropriateness of the book at this grade level. I read CarLitGuy's link, and I have a lot of questions about the module in general. Why is this particular book, which is known to have some coarse material that may or may not be appropriate for the grade level, the core text for the lesson, when there's a list of books that are approved for the classroom on the same topic? If you're looking for emotional impact, there are hundreds of thousands of pages written on the Holocaust that provide that, that don't contain material that would be controversial (which, from the link, it appears they anticipated because they discussed redacted portions of it before the meeting). What's the justification, in an introductory module, for using THIS text as the anchor and not another text, with this text maybe as supplementary or supporting material? I didn't find their reasoning compelling, "Well, then we'd have to re-write the whole module."
I haven't read the book, so I can't really speak to the content, but this being an introductory lesson, is a graphic novel really the best text to teach the Holocaust, when there are hundreds of other texts out there?
Based on the meeting notes, the state Board of Education did approve Maus for 8th grade.
You could carve out some time for Gulag Archipelago now, it's well worth the read. One of the more harrowing tales of bureaucratic, political inhumanity, and the utter failure of socialism/communism to be worthwhile, ever written.
Oh, I'm well aware. I've been exposed to some long passages and I definitely have a thematic understanding of the book. But I feel like I really need to sit down and read it.
Working towards a kinder and gentler history.
I hope that some of the young people in these schools will pick up books like Maus and 1619 Project and use them for book reports. Let the school boards know that like it or not these books still get read.
Maus is historical fiction that sometimes takes the metaphor to the point that it sometimes verges on psychological thriller.
1619 project is historical fiction on the level of Disney's Pocahontas, fictionalized to the point that it is actively deceptive.
Pulling Maus from the curriculum and banning the 1619 Project are both attempts to avoid unpleasant history. The Holocaust did happen, as did slavery and Jim Crow. There is nothing deceptive about the fact that Nazi targeted Jews and other disenfranchised persons. There nothing deceptive about the fact that until the end of the civil war the US had slavery based on race and that the same rationales used to justify slavery before the war was used to put down blacks after the war.
Perhaps you could point out what in 1619 Project is inaccurate? Have you read the book or is your criticism based on a Fox News report?
Perhaps you could point out what in 1619 Project is inaccurate?
Everything.
It is so deeply ridiculously flawed as to be worse than nonsense.
But let's just start with the premise. The first African slave was in the Americas LOOOOONG before 1619.
And we're done.
I think you probably did not read the book, because there is nothing in the book to suggest African slaves were not in the new world before 1619. There is a reason that 1619 was chosen for the discussion. Read the book and see if you can figure out why.
Numerous historians have devoted volumes to what is inaccurate about the 1619 project. The author has even admitted to many of the mistakes. Keep up.
They aren't banning the Holocaust education, and they didn't ban Maus, they chose a different textbook to use for their Holocaust section. They are still teaching, just not with your preferred text.
Regarding the 1619, numerous historians, many of them black, have written volumes on the numerous historical mistakes and inaccuracies of the 1619 project. The author isn't even a historian, but a journalist who has at times admitted that it is not historically accurate. Also, find one single school anywhere in the US that doesn't teach about slavery. You don't want people taught about slavery,you want your perspective,based upon dubious scholarship, taught. It would be one thing if the book was actually historically accurate, but it isn't.
Why would you conflate Maus with an ahistorical pile of shit?
That's great. I fully support kids choosing to read those books and doing a book report on them. That is a completely different question from forcing kids to read those books against their desires.
I don't think it is the kids objecting to the books, it is the parents. I would also point out that we are all forced to read books we don't desire to read in grade school, high school, and college. It has always been that way. I for one never went on to read more gothic romances, Elizabethan romances, or Emily Dickenson poems, as the few I read in school were enough for me.
When Jean-Marie LePen said "the Holocaust is a mere footnote to the history of World War II" (and was prosecuted and fined for doing so), he was correct.
That a comic book about the Holocaust should be an "anchor text" for teaching the history of World War II is beyond ridiculous. Including it at all is little short of ridiculous. Neither Churchill, Eisenhower, nor deGaulle even mentioned it in their multi-volume books covering said history. It is a mere footnote and, in common with history generally, made up chiefly of lies.
I would love to give major kudos to whoever wrote the headline. Reason is the only news source I have seen talking about this that accurately represents what is going on in the headline.
There are far too many places that described this as a "ban", because they think that not forcing kids to read a book is the same as preventing them from reading it, I guess?