St. Louis Taxpayers Paid a Lot To Run a Money-Losing Streetcar. It Could Cost Them Even More To Shut It Down.
The Federal Transit Administration says St. Louis officials either need to get its Loop Trolley back up and running or return $37 million in federal funds.

In a paradox only the federal government could produce, St. Louis officials are having to decide whether they want to spend money reviving the city's long-troubled, currently mothballed trolley line or lose even more money shutting it down permanently.
Late last month, media outlets reported on a letter that the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) sent St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones saying that local officials had until February to come up with a plan to get its 2.2-mile Loop Trolley back up and running or else return the $37 million in funds the federal government provided for the project.
This is only the latest setback in the long, sad saga of the St. Louis streetcar.
The trolley started operational life in 2018—six years behind schedule and about $10 million over budget. Neighboring businesses—which were supposed to be the primary beneficiaries of the new streetcar—complained that the inconvenience of the trolley's construction was instead costing them customers.
When it did open, ticket sales brought only around 10 percent of expected revenue, almost immediately throwing the line into financial distress. Creative efforts to boost ridership, including a Friday-night Laugh Tracks service during which comedians performed 40-minute sets along the 2-mile route, produced about as many chuckles as it did new customers.
The streetcar was then mothballed in December 2019 after county officials refused the trolley operator's request for a $700,000 bailout to keep the system running into 2020. (The Loop Trolley's website says it is currently shut down to help prevent the spread of COVID-19.)
All of these examples recommend against reviving the Loop Trolley. But The FTA's ultimatum has St. Louis officials in a bit of a bind.
Reviving the streetcar will obviously require officials to find additional operating funds. Not reviving the streetcar will require paying back $37 million in capital costs the feds sunk into the project. Worse still, returning federal funds would also hurt the St. Louis region's ability to secure federal grants for future projects.
The St. Louis streetcar's supporters have long used that latter risk to justify keeping the line alive.
"We have come entirely too far and invested too much with the Loop Trolley to just walk away," said then-Mayor Lyda Krewson in December 2019, when the trolley was first shuttered. "What critics of the project fail to realize is that walking away would put us all at risk of defaulting on federal grants and losing out on future federal transportation funding."
The logic is proving convincing for even long-time streetcar critics.
"While the mayor did not support the Loop Trolley's construction, she is committed to fixing this problem to protect our region's transit dollars and our ability to receive federal support moving forward," said Nick Dunne, a spokesperson for Jones, in an email to Center Square.
Taxpayers are also being put in a no-win situation, says Baruch Feigenbaum, senior managing director of transportation policy with the Reason Foundation (which publishes Reason).
"I like the idea that you have to continue operating it if you get federal funding. Otherwise, what's to stop an entity from applying for federal funding [and then] shutting it down?" says Feigenbaum. "There have to be some consequences or the taxpayer is going to get screwed worse than they already are."
Still, he says, that threat of losing federal funds for future transit projects incentivizes local and state governments to milk taxpayers in order to keep zombie transportation systems few people ride alive.
Feigenbaum says federal transit officials need to adopt more objective criteria and around ridership and financial sustainability when dolling out grants to localities to avoid future St. Louis Loop Trolley scenarios.
Indeed, the Urban Circulator grant program, which provided the bulk of federal funding to St. Louis's streetcar, vetted grant applications based on hard-to-quantify criteria like livability, environmental sustainability, economic development, and "stakeholder collaboration."
The circulator program also funded streetcar projects in Cincinnati, Ohio, and Charlotte, North Carolina, that—while not as disastrous as the Loop Trolley—suffer from low ridership and are almost entirely dependent on taxpayer funding to cover operating expenses.
The mess that is the St. Louis streetcar suggests that much less transit funding overall should come from the federal government. If local and state policymakers had to rely more heavily on their own voters and taxpayers to fund projects, they'd have to be more thoughtful about which ones they chose. Those same taxpayers and voters would have a real incentive to pay attention to their local and state governments.
Politicians would also likely be more willing to walk away from clearly failed projects if they weren't also putting future federal grants at risk.
The $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act signed into law by President Joe Biden in November 2021 moves federal transportation policy in the opposite direction. The law provides $550 billion in new spending, including $39 billion in new transit spending.
That leaves a lot more money that could potentially go to the next St. Louis Loop Trolley.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ruh roh .... somebody didn't read Romance of the Rails which details how just about every light rail system has been a disaster, ridership-wise and finance-wise. Of course, most usually don't have any real intentions of doing good for riders or the community, but they all pretend so.
His name is Joe Edwards, and he owns a large swath of the commercial property the trolley was supposed to serve.
What was also funnier than the Friday night comedy rides was the fact that if people parked poorly, the trolley would hit their vehicles. This happened often. Turns out the darned thing can't move over just because Karen can't park. It's on rails.
https://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2018/11/13/the-loop-trolley-just-hit-another-parked-vehicle
I think you mean that his name is Lyle Lanley and he's sold trolleys to Brockway, Ogdenville and North Haverbrook. It put those places on the map!
My name is Paula, I'm 24 years old)) Beginning SEX model) I love to be photographed in the NUDE) Please rate my photos at - https://xurl.es/id378955
Start working at home with G00gle! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this–4 weeks past.I began this 8-months ago and immediately was brindfswdging home at least $77 per hour.
I work thr0ugh this link, G0 to tech tab for work detail.………>>> Visit Here
Monorail!
Didn’t Trump try to get California to give back a few billion from the train to nowhere?
And did not the courts force them to give California the money anyway?
Cant Saint Louis do what California did?
Your federal highway fund at work.
It's an interstate trolley?
I believe Pete refers to diversion of highway “trust” (wink) funds that are diverted to pay for such boondoggles.
Well, they are just required to come up with a PLAN, not a solution.
I will act as a consultant, and waive my usual fees for the greater good (that good being the taxpayers, not the crooks).
Step one of the plan; continue the necessary shutdown for health reasons until COVID has been completely eradicated for two years.
Step two; see step one.
Can't wait they want to build a street car for 100k people in my area.
What area is that?
Missoula https://missoulacurrent.com/business/2019/05/downtown-missoula-plan-2/
Just about every new rail start in the last 40 years has turned into a disaster and they all have one thing in common. They were all approved for funding by an FTA official who thought it was a good idea.
Coming up with a plan to dig your way out of a hole is pretty simple. You obviously need bigger shovels or more shovels and that's about your only choice. I mean, you could just stop shoveling, but what is that going to accomplish?
You gotta spend money to make money, as they say.
"Or we could print money to make money," says the Fed.
A streetcar named retire
Milwaukee's streetcar cost $125 million to build and costs $4.1 million each year to run. Average ridership in 2021 was about 500 per day. It was supposed to cost $1 per ride but the city has never charged. So even for $0 only 800 people per day ride it. If they charged that would be about $250,000 in revenue to cover $4.1 million in operating costs. And what does the city want to do with that $400 million in new COVID money? Expand the streetcar, because then people will ride it and they can charge lots of $$$ and recover the operating costs!
For our bus system I think we've abandoned the idea it needs to make profit, unfortunately we now pay via taxes and it's free rides for all.
Next up: homeless riding the bus all day every day.
What's next, pay people to ride it?
We tried that.
The streetcar is why the murder rate is down 25%. I’m not suggesting one caused the other, but imagine how much incredibly dumb shit the press would be saying had homicides risen 25%
Thanks enb
A+
The infatuation with 19th century transportation technology puzzles me.
It's not just transportation technology. See: Windmills.
But Europe does it!
Streetcars are faster than planes!
I'm assuming the animal rights nuts vetoed horse drawn trolley cars.
It stems from hatred of private automobile ownership and a desire to control the masses.
Trains of any type cover both of these ideas.
If someone is confused about the concept of a white elephant, just send them this story.
I'm picturing a scene out of The Simpsons monorail episode.
"Forget it, it's more of a KANSAS CITY sort of idea."
By the way, I was typing my Simpsons reset while yours posted (I had to check my map to make sure the cities were right).
Why is the federal government paying for a streetcar in st lous?
To further the illusion that federal spending is free money.
The federal transportation grant funds had already been allocated by congress - probably earmarked by Lacey Clay - and so of course they HAVE to spend them. If they don't spend them, they won't be allocated next year.
The city of Johnstown, PA recently, gleefully, announced that grants of more than $20 million were coming from Amtrak and State to rebuild the Johnstown rail station. Pretty sure you could setup a manufactured building and pave the existing parking lot for about 1/20th that amount. Oh, and only two trains a day stop at Johnstown, averaging 15 fares on and off. Nostalgia for trains keeps the voters funding the hobby of a few geezers and train nuts.
Oh, that ain't workin' that's the way you do it
Get your money for nothin', get your chicks for free
"Dear" Federal Government, Google "sunk cost fallacy". Thank You, Concerned Citizen
> ...local officials had until February to come up with a plan to get its 2.2-mile Loop Trolley back up and running or else return the $37 million in funds the federal government provided for the project.
Not to worry. STL can use some of the $790 million settlement it got from the NFL for its OTHER public funding disaster.
The shrinking base of Federal taxpayers (39 percent) will eat this; otherwise, it’s just racist.
Worse still, returning federal funds would also hurt the St. Louis region's ability to secure federal grants for future projects.
This statement is just wrong on many levels.
Worst still is that many people, including Reason editors, think the federal government, without Article I Section 8 authority, should be involved in local transportation projects.
It is a very nice photo of a quaint-looking tourist attraction.
But it sounds like a foolish scheme that required massive political support from groups with no interest or skills in transportation or tourism.