California Distillers Get a New Year's Eve Reprieve From Ban on Shipping Booze Direct to Customers
Distillers have been granted emergency regulatory relief—for now.
2021 was a challenging year for California distillers, but it's ending with some good news. Yesterday the state's Alcoholic Beverage Commission (ABC) extended emergency regulatory relief for distillers that will allow them to continue shipping spirits directly to consumers, a measure that was set to expire on January 1. The new extension will last until March 31, 2022.
As Reason reported on Tuesday, liberalization of direct shipping rules has helped California distillers offset sales lost in other channels during the pandemic, such as tasting room visits and in-store tastings. Along with legalizing to-go cocktails and relaxing restrictions on outdoor dining and drinking, these rule changes helped small businesses survive the pandemic. But while these latter two changes have been extended, direct shipping of spirits was stuck in regulatory limbo: The state legislature is considering a bill to legalize it permanently, but a vote wouldn't be expected until months after the emergency order expired.
A coalition of state senators, California distillers, and trade groups urged Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state ABC to extend direct shipping long enough for the legislature to take up the question. Senate bill S.B. 620 would allow California distilleries and some other entities to make direct shipping to consumers a part of their business for the long term. It would also put California distillers on even footing with wineries and breweries, who already enjoy this privilege.
"I'm relieved that I'm not getting cut off from a huge portion of my customer base," says Aaron Bergh, president and distiller at Calwise Spirits in Paso Robles, California. "But we haven't cleared the hurdles yet and could find ourselves back in a precarious position in three months if we don't make our voices heard. I hope the legislature ultimately votes to pass S.B. 620 so we can continue to run our businesses responsibly and foster consumer choice, marketplace competition, and safety."
"We appreciate the governor and ABC giving California small distillers some breathing room to keep our businesses afloat as we work this legislation through the process," says Alex Villicana of Re:Find Distillery, also in Paso Robles. "Craft distillers have dedicated a lot of human and financial resources to this issue and we hope to gain parity with wineries on direct to consumer shipping in the upcoming months."
If passed, California will join nine other states that have legalized direct shipping of spirits, along with 46 others in which direct shipping of wine is permitted. The pandemic response has vastly accelerated liberalization of alcohol laws despite opposition from temperance groups concerned about easier access to drink. Long term, these changes promise to expand access to the longtail of niche spirits, many of which are inconvenient or impossible to purchase due to requirements to sell through a three-tier system in which distributors act as a mandatory middleman between producers and consumers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Cheers instead of booze.
As long as direct shipping creates no bottlenecks I offer my spirited support.
alcohol kills Covid.
Drink!
l' chaim!
So I guess I need a Covid shot! Naziorov’e!
I have received dfy exactly $20845 last month from this and home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online nam by follow instruction
on the given website........... Visit Here
Externally, yes. Internally, not so much.
I have received exactly $20845 last month from this and home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online HAg by follow instruction
on the given website...........Visit Here
The world where Government resticts alcohol is one "Where everybody knows your name..."
Just as long as they confirm their subservience to their political masters.
So California is giving itself three more months to figure out how to tax and regulate direct shipping of liquor.
Too bad theyre nor as smart as you are...
You figgered it out immediately!
They never read about the 1930s...
Its time to go a-Bootleggin!
Yee Haw!!!
It is good news indeed that master is being so kind to the peasants.
Libertarian moment. The Eye of Sauron moved to the west for a few moments.
Other States, esp. WA are kicking hiney with wine sales. WA produces stellar wines. Sime world class and a lot of it.
CA no longer has a lock on it so my guess is thats whats behind it.
I have the worst luck with libertarian moments. I’m always blinking right when they happen!
It's a Maalox Moment, only for Leviathan:
Maalox Plus - Gas Commercial - Moving Vase - Maalox (1988)
https://youtu.be/s3RexoOMU1k
And is bloodshot from New Year's Rockin' Eve.
Alcoholic Beverage Commission (ABC) extended emergency regulatory relief for distillers that will allow them to continue shipping spirits directly to consumers,
I'd like to ship a phantasm to Gavin Newsom.
Happy New Year, dummies.
turd hasn't shown up yet.
Alcoholic Beverage Commission (ABC) extended emergency regulatory relief for distillers that will allow them to continue shipping spirits directly…January , February, March.
For ABC it’s as easy as one two three
CNN lied about "confirming the first Omicron death". Independent journalist called up the Texas Dept. of Health and asked them straight out, "did this person die of covid"
Answer: That can't be confirmed, all we know is they had a positive test when they died.
A phone call... that's all it took. One phone call.
So CNN was able to publish bullshit by avoiding only ONE phone call?
Imagine the lack of efforts required for the rest of their content! By not making two or three phone calls, they could come up with, well, perhaps some pole of lies regarding Trump and the Russkis
Editor of Scientific Journal demands "content changes" after full peer review-- wants scientific facts removed, such as people with "melanin-rich skin" having increased risk of vitamin D deficiency-- something that is a simple, plain, undisputed fact.
vitamin D deficiency
Uh, I think you mean, vitamin D inequality.
Vitamin d inequity
Vitamin D disparate impact.
I think there’s intersectionality involved as well. That’s why this report had to be curbed.
Since it involves the D, the intersection had to be in a Red Light District.
If I had my way, no man or woman would have deficiency in the D.
Relying on favors from the rulers is always a bad deal.
And this is why the US is a banana republic. Make a rule and if you give me money you don't have to follow said rule
https://b2n.ir/m39488
https://b2n.ir/t91812
https://b2n.ir/t46186
https://b2n.ir/h07263
https://atisang.com/shop/3269-night-marble/
https://b2n.ir/m74650
https://b2n.ir/m54371
https://b2n.ir/759577
https://atisang.com/crystal
https://b2n.ir/s19365
https://b2n.ir/r95360
https://b2n.ir/b96510
stone marble
https://b2n.ir/r95360
https://b2n.ir/b96510
stone marble whate
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P295-green-marble.html
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P292-sang-divar.html
divar stone