In 2021, Qualified Immunity Reform Died a Slow, Painful Death
Despite bipartisan momentum at the federal level, Congress still couldn't get anything over the finish line.

The year 2021 was widely seen, almost certainly foolishly, as the end of a dark era and the beginning of a much, much brighter one. It wasn't just the close of any year. It was the end of 2020.
Tied up in that was the supposed promise of criminal justice reform, coming off of a summer that saw qualified immunity transform from a lofty legal doctrine known by few to something seen on protest signs at rallies attended by thousands. And over the last 12 months, politicians took some steps to advance criminal justice reform. But as is the case with so many New Year's expectations, quite a bit also stayed exactly the same.
That stagnation came despite considerable bipartisan momentum propelling Republicans and Democrats toward reform in 2021, after the police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd fueled a national conversation around accountability for law enforcement.
Central to that debate was qualified immunity, the principle conjured to life by the Supreme Court which allows various government officials to violate your rights without fear of a civil suit if the way in which they do so has not yet been "clearly established" in a prior court precedent. It's why, for example, two officers were able to allegedly steal $225,000 while executing a search warrant without having to explain that to a jury in civil court. We should all know stealing is wrong, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit noted, but without a court ruling that expressly applies to the particular circumstances in question, can we really expect government agents to apply that moral tenet?
Many would say yes. That's why Sens. Cory Booker (D–N.J.) and Tim Scott (R–S.C.), flanked by Rep. Karen Bass (D–Calif.), appeared optimistic throughout the year that they would pass some version of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act with limitations on qualified immunity. At the federal level, the proposal would have also banned chokeholds, carotid holds, and no-knock warrants for drug investigations, and it would have incentivized the same at the state level by tying those measures to federal funding. Further, it would have created a national database to track police misconduct—local departments are typically very opaque with such data—and it would have constrained the amount of military equipment passed down to departments across the country, among other provisions.
But the qualified immunity portion would prove to be the most difficult bridge to build, as the May 25, 2021, deadline to pass the Justice in Policing Act—imposed by President Joe Biden—came and went. Scott, who led Republican negotiations for the Senate, originally proposed a compromise where victims of police abuse would be able to sue departments instead of individual police officers. Some Democrats pushed back, questioning if it would provide any meaningful avenue to accountability. But it was reportedly Scott who distanced himself from his own provision after floating it with members of the law enforcement lobby.
Following months of negotiations, the deal—in its entirety—was pronounced dead in September.
"We started out the year thinking about George Floyd," says Cynthia Roseberry, deputy director of the Justice Division at the American Civil Liberties Union. "And then policing reform just went away. Qualified immunity remains even today."
It will likely remain for some time. There are other pieces of stalled legislation on various facets of criminal legal reform, Roseberry notes, that could have also become law, had Congress found the political will to do so this year. Those include the EQUAL Act, which would give relief to inmates who were sentenced to harsher prison terms for using crack instead of powder cocaine; the MORE Act, which would end federal marijuana prohibition; and the First Step Implementation Act, which would retroactively apply sentencing reforms to prisoners who were sentenced before the First Step Act of 2018 was passed into law.
Even still, there were some criminal justice reform successes that flew under the radar, says Kevin Ring, president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums. "California repealed its drug mandatory minimums, Maryland got rid of juvenile life without parole….There were still places where you could see progress and reforms move forward." He also mentions that, while the EQUAL Act is yet to pass the Senate, it passed the House of Representatives with 361 votes, even from conservative hardliners Jim Jordan (R–Ohio) and Kevin McCarthy (R–Calif.).
Though Congress holds the majority of the bargaining chips, Roseberry says she would like to see at least one thing from Biden: "He needs to use clemency now and often," she tells Reason. "If the sentence is wrong, if it's inappropriate at Christmastime or at the end of his term, it was inappropriate at the beginning of his term or during the rest of the year."
Presidents are indeed known to invoke their clemency powers as they're heading out of the Oval Office for the last time. A related decision recently came at the eleventh hour: The Department of Justice released a memo last week announcing that thousands of prisoners released on home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic will be able to complete their sentences from home. "This was a do-no-harm measure," says Ring. "These people were already sent home….This was consolidating something that had already happened."
That doesn't mean those 2,800 prisoners are now free. They'll still be kept to a rigorous monitoring program, and any slip-ups can result in a one-way ticket to a cell. Such was the case with Gwen Levi, a 76-year-old woman who served 16 years for dealing heroin and was taken back to federal prison because she attended a word-processing class. So, too, did Jeffrey Martinovich meet that fate after failing to answer his phone during one of his nightly check-ins, although his GPS monitor showed he was at his house as required.
Of the thousands of inmates impacted by the recent decision, Ring adds that "it's clear these people shouldn't go back….I just want to make sure we find a way to avoid them getting violated over stupid little infractions…because the consequences are so great for these people. It's not like they'd go back for two months. They'd go back for five years."
Levi will get to reap the benefits of the Justice Department's memo; she was released again in July after a national outrage. Meanwhile, Martinovich, who was convicted of white-collar crimes in 2013, will call the Federal Correctional Institution at Beckley his home until August 25, 2025.
Despite some policy wins in 2021, victims of government misconduct will have to wait longer still for accountability reform. Rules and regulations for state actors may change, but that matters little if they cannot be held accountable for breaking those very guidelines. As never before, public opinion took a hard turn against qualified immunity—a doctrine that sends a message to government agents that they are above the laws they enforce. If the energy going into 2021 wasn't enough to move Congress, what will be?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Goddamn, you are stupid billy.
It lost when it was tied to the "defund the Police" movement.
It lost when the left embraced it as a good idea, which meant conservatives had no choice but to oppose it lest they be accused of agreeing with the left on something.
The most important thing, always, is Team Red vs Team Blue!
Team Purple!
Better yet: no teams at all.
The fucking lies you idiots tell yourself.
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ... Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ... Mᴀᴋᴇ $90 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $12000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ... Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ,go to tech tab for work detail,.......... Visit Here
I have received exactly $20845 last month from this and home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online HAx by follow instruction
on the given website...........Visit Here
You mean a false golden mean fallacy when your far left leanings become too much dont you?
You are cheering an unarmed woman being shot in the other thread lol.
Principles right?
"By Unarmed woman" You mean the traitor with an armed mob at her back who attempted to hang the VP, overturn the constitution and install a dictatorship?
The left was never against it. it was nothing more than a fig leaf, a bone tossed to their progressive base... who also wasn't too keen on it once they realized the Teacher's unions would have none of it.
Biden could issue an executive order on it and see if it stands up. But then that might mean Ashli Babbitt was murdered. Instead, her trespassing was aborted.
REASON EDITORS - SAY HER NAME!!!
Reason has repeatedly characterized Jan 6 as a "deadly attack". So, I guess they're referring to Babbitt when they say that. I think.
always hopeful the underlying common theme of your pieces will be as obvious to you one day as it is to me
I am shocked-- shocked!-- to find that there is unioning going on in here.
The writer did not identify qualified immunity and its Intent. Qualified immunity does not justify illegal behavior or actions.
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10492
In 2021, Qualified Immunity Reform Died a Slow, Painful Death
I wonder if Reason Editors could have done more to save it by denouncing those "fiery" "protests" and distancing the very idea of criminal justice reform from those horrific acts of Peace and Love.
Nah, everyone knows you gotta burn the cities to the ground before something better can spring up.
Well, to be sure, on the other hand, in the sixties the crazy hippies were saying "you can't fight city hall, but you can burn it down".
Some things just naturally take longer than others.
Jesus Christ, are we begging the gov't to reel in their paid enforcers? Pathetic.
QI ends when the citizenry starts enforcing disciplinary action on abusive gov't agents. If a cop violates you or a family member, and receives QI, It's up to you to get justice. Swift or cold, it's up to you. This clamoring for the gov't to fix gov't agents is over.
Whoohoo! Anarchy! Vigilantism! Societal breakdown!
If those Founding Fathers had just obeyed the law, we could all be good little slaves like Mike. Keep on sea-lioning.
You were in favor of those things last year, Mike.
What changed?
And how do you think government will react when people start exacting their own justice?
Depends on whether they leave any live witnesses.
(Double tap)
If video doesn't matter why would winesses?
I mean you cheered government shooting one in the other thread..
According to the 2020 riots, the cops will stand down.
The government will murder (or try to murder) anyone who tries exacting their own justice. People are not getting justice now; neither criminal charges or civil resolution.
What do you suggest?
They will censor the statistics and cause Twits to silence such reporting as fake news. That, at least, is what happened when Herbert Hoover's Republicans ran both Hice-of-ill-repute AND packed the courts with shoot-first prohibitionist fanatics.
Historically, by 1929 prohibition agents were known as "dry killers" and prosecutor Willebrandt reported that they had killed 135 civilians. But 55 dry agents and 6 coast guards plus 3 narcotics agents and 9 customs agents were resistance victims. At a ratio of merely 5 to 9, dry fanatics were no more willing to repeal Prohibition than the Japanese were after the Hiroshima explosion. Mystical fanaticism is very inelastic in its disregard for human life. It is almost as if its whole purpose were to maximize the death rate. Cop killings increased so fast they quit reporting them so that Prohibition could persist another 3 years.
Man, getting rid of QI just to show how woke we are, is a dangerous thing to do. Cops are under an incredible magnifying glass and what do you think will happen if cops have to worry about each and every action? ...and in retrospect too! ...and with body cams as well? This will shift the balance of policing to the wrong side.
"...what do you think will happen if cops have to worry about each and every action?"
Oh, I don't know... maybe less abuse from police?
QI doesn't only protect egregious actions. QI also protects from sudden creations of rights by the judicial branch. Post gay marriage ruling declaring it a right, lawyers would be able to sue any government worker such as a file clerk who worked under the prior precedence. That is why QI was formed.
No it doesn't have toe extend to egregious abuses, but demolishing it completely leads to near anarchy as liability is thrust upon every non lawyer government worker who thought they were acting in good faith.
Note to foreign readers: by "wrong side" the sockpuppet means the other half of the violent looter Kleptocracy.
Told you it would.
Libertarian candidates can now speechify voters that a vote for the looter Kleptocracy means a license to kill without facing charges--for enforcers of laws against plant leaves. That plus what our adversaries say about each other ought to be worth a couple million additional votes at least, if we can find a Libertarian Candidate.
The goal should have been “fully fund ‘constitutional’ policing” without cutting police funding. In other words only defund “unconstitutional” practices, not the entire police department.
The result would have been, the “unconstitutional” funding would have gone to hiring more officers, officer pay raises and community policing but banned the bad stuff. Police unions likely would have supported this also.
Rule of Thumb:
“Popular Issues” are usually supported by the two political branches (Executive and Legislative).
The “Judicial Branch” courts top duty is to uphold “Unpopular Issues” like constitutional rights of unpopular persons and unpopular causes to prevent a “tyranny of the majority” (James Madison’s warning to Americans). The real crisis is when judges become political.