Biden Administration Reverses Course, Will Let Prisoners Sent Home Due to Pandemic Stay There
Christmas comes a few days early for 2,800 inmates who had told they’d eventually have to return to their cells to serve out their terms.

Thousands of federal prisoners put into home confinement for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic may not have to return to prison cells after the crisis is over, according to a new analysis by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
In March 2020, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, a massive pandemic-related aid and spending bill. Among its many provisions, it granted the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) the authority to release some federal prisoners and put them in home confinement for as long as the government classified the pandemic as a national emergency. This was a mechanism for attempting to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in prisons. More than 4,800 federal prisoners were placed into home confinement under the CARES Act.
In the final days of President Donald Trump's administration, the DOJ released a determination that after the federal government declared that the pandemic emergency was over, those inmates who had been released under the CARES Act would have to return to prison, regardless of how well they had behaved on home release.
This determination inspired a wave of criminal justice activism as President Joe Biden took office and reformers lobbied the White House and DOJ to do something to stop this from happening. Many of these inmates had rejoined their families and some had even found work. They were contributing to society. Recidivism rates among them were extremely low; as of July, the criminal justice reform organization Brennan Center estimated that roughly 20 had violated the terms of their release.
But earlier this summer, the Biden administration determined that the Trump-era memo was correct: Once the government formally decides that the pandemic emergency is over, 2,800 of the prisoners released by the CARES Act would have to report back to prison to complete their sentences.
After that determination, there was a push for Biden to use his clemency powers to commute these people's sentences so they could remain free. The administration announced plans for an extremely limited call for commutation applications that covered only non-violent drug offenders with less than four years remaining in their sentences.
But on Tuesday, the DOJ reversed course. A 15-page memo by Christopher H. Schroeder, assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel, revisited the text of the CARES Act and how the BOP is authorized to extend home confinement. Schroeder determined that the BOP does have the discretion to keep these inmates at home. His memo cross-checks other BOP memos and policies about home confinement, quoting a previous memo that states, "Under regular circumstances, inmates who have made this transition to home confinement would not be returned to a secured facility, unless there was a disciplinary reason for doing so, as the benefit of home confinement is to adjust to life back in the community, and therefore removal from the community would obviously frustrate that goal." Schroeder also notes that more recently passed federal laws, like the FIRST STEP Act of 2018, have expanded the use of home confinement for more extended periods.
Attorney General Merrick Garland released a brief statement in support of the new determination:
"Thousands of people on home confinement have reconnected with their families, have found gainful employment, and have followed the rules. In light of today's Office of Legal Counsel opinion, I have directed that the Department engage in a rulemaking process to ensure that the Department lives up to the letter and the spirit of the CARES Act. We will exercise our authority so that those who have made rehabilitative progress and complied with the conditions of home confinement, and who in the interests of justice should be given an opportunity to continue transitioning back to society, are not unnecessarily returned to prison."
Criminal just reform organizations are thrilled. "Thousands of people can now breathe a sigh of relief knowing they will be able to remain in the communities where they have been living and working," said Udi Ofer, justice division director for the American Civil Liberties Union, in a prepared statement. "Voters overwhelmingly agree with this decision. A poll released by the ACLU found that 68 percent of voters believe that it would be unfair to force these individuals back to prison."
"This is excellent news for thousands of people and their families to get before the holidays," said FAMM President Kevin Ring."There is no way the people on CARES Act home confinement should have been sent back to prison, and we are very grateful to the Biden administration for fixing this mistake."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Transexuelles sur Shemale Toulon is great place for finding hot ladies for casual chat contacts in France with fine ladies
Shemale Sex Bremen is great place for sexy chat contact in EU
Except that hundreds/thousands of Trump supporters remain in imprisoned (including many in solitary confinement) for peacefully protesting on Jan 6,
Seems like the only federal inmates that were let out (purportedly due to the covid pandemic) were those who had Democrat voter registration cards.
Nothing like allowing murderers, rapists, and other violent thugs out of federal prisons to make more room for Trump supporters who peacefully protested an obviously rigged election.
But they committed non violent parading. Should be life.
Felons can't register to vote.
lol USPS handles unregistered voters now.
Oh yeah. The election was stolen, it's all rigged, blah blah blah.
votes were accepted by mail. this is the fact I was stating. I apologize if you can't understand figurative speech.
I still don't understand what you're getting at. That people in prison vote by mail without being registered?
Jesus Christ, you’re dumb.
If you have to resort to insults, it is a sure sign that you have no argument to make. We get it. Progressives are evil. Pure evil! The election was stolen!
In addition to being stupid, you’re a damn crybaby.
What a cogent and thoughtful response!
No, it's because you're a frothing idiot and it's impossible to teach one that refuses to learn.
Now go have another beer, Skippy. Your liver won't kill itself and nobody likes you anyway.
Forget figurative speech, the literal phrase was "were those who *had* Democrat voter registration cards" meaning, by his own tenets, they held voter registration cards before they were convicted.
"Put your faith in mass media and government, for they are trustworthy and beyond question."
-sarcasmic
Says the nut who thinks Alex Jones is a credible journalist.
I'll not even ask for a cite, because it doesn't exist.
You're such an emotionally broken low IQ authority-sucking simp that you can't come up with a relevant rejoinder, just an impotent insult common to leftist fantasy.
Isn't the term undocumented voters?
Depends on where they live:
In the District of Columbia, Maine and Vermont, felons never lose their right to vote, even while they are incarcerated.
In 21 states, felons lose their voting rights only while incarcerated, and receive automatic restoration upon release.
In 16 states, felons lose their voting rights during incarceration, and for a period of time after, typically while on parole and/or probation. Voting rights are automatically restored after this time period. Former felons may also have to pay any outstanding fines, fees or restitution before their rights are restored as well.
In 11 states felons lose their voting rights indefinitely for some crimes, or require a governor’s pardon in order for voting rights to be restored, face an additional waiting period after completion of sentence (including parole and probation) or require additional action before voting rights can be restored.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/felon-voting-rights.aspx
Peaceful Protesting my ass.
https://s.abcnews.com/images/Politics/capitol-siege-911-commission-03-gty-llr-210219_1613766112834_hpEmbed_23x16_992.jpg
So peaceful.
freedoms and perks for convicted criminals and non-citizens and actual US Citizens are told to be patriotic and get a jab.
freedoms and perks for convicted criminals and non-citizens WHILE actual US Citizens are told to be patriotic and get a jab.
The government has a certain affinity with criminals.
Well, it's the Biden Administration that made this determination, Puddinhead Joe has the last word. And what better way to get those Covid numbers pumped up than by forcing everybody to cram together and cough on each other? I won't be surprised if Joe "I Incarcerated All The Negroes" Biden rescinds the rescission.
>>Schroeder determined that the BOP does have the discretion to keep these inmates at home.
Schroeder can keep all the inmates he wants at home.
Makes one wonder if they should have been there in the first place. Seriously, what's the point of prison? What purpose does it serve? People in prison learn how to live in prison while their job skills become outdated, and when they leave they're going to have a difficult time becoming productive members of society. Meanwhile scarce resources are being used to take care of them. Who benefits, other than the prison industrial complex and prosecutors seeking higher office?
I think Heinlein got it right in Starship Troopers (not to be confused with the movie of the same name). Lock people up with bad people and all they learn is how to be bad people.
I think Heinlein got it right in Starship Troopers (not to be confused with the movie of the same name).
Heinlein made a movie titled Starship Troopers?
No. Somebody else bought the rights to the title and slapped it on a film pushing different ideas. RAH might have sent them to Coventry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)
The idea, Buckwheat, is that prison SHOULD be an unpleasant place you don't want to go back to.
We call this "punishment." When someone is naughty, they go in time out for a while until they promise to behave better.
When prison is not a punishment...
More schadenfreude for your enjoyment. Looks like left wing Democrats (i.e. Socialists) are omicron super spreaders.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/22/d-c-reports-highest-coronavirus-cases-per-capita-in-nation/
Something something natural immunity something...
If convicted criminals escaping their sentences is good news, then Harvard professors being convicted for taking taxpayer money under false pretenses should be great news.
"Lieber's research group at Harvard had received over $15 million in funding from the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense, which requires disclosing foreign financial conflicts of interests. The jury found that Lieber had lied about his affiliation with the Wuhan University of Technology in China and a contract he had with a Chinese talent recruitment plan to attract high-level scientists to the country.
He was being paid $50,000 per month by the Chinese university and given $1.5 million to establish a nanoscience research lab at WUT, the Justice Department said in a news release. Lieberman was specifically affiliated with China's Thousand Talents Program, which the department called "one of the most prominent talent recruitment plans designed to attract, recruit and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China's scientific development, economic prosperity and national security."
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/politics/charles-lieber-harvard-china-ties-guilty/index.html
Don't do the crime
if you can't do the time
I saw that earlier, but wondered what the report was not telling us. For instance, "paid $50K/month" sure sounds sweet, but how much of that was for the research lab they mention right after?
And when will Fauci be held accountable for the larger sums he funneled to Wuhan for gain of function research, and held accountable for lying under oath?
I know which of these two did more harm and more crime, and it isn't the one doing the time.
In other words, when the literal legal meaning of the law didn't comport with desires, they used Garland, again, to come up with a new interpretation that suited the desired results.
One of the odd features of all dictators is their urge to cloak everything they do in legality -- show trials, sham legislation, malleable judges. It was bad enough when the Supreme Court justified slavery with Dred Scott, or gutted the 14th Amendment with the Slaughterhouse cases. FDR's court packing scare put paid to the last figment of the rule of law. That alone is proof enough that we don't liver in the land of liberty proclaimed by the Framers. It may not be a Stalinesque dictatorship, but there are all kinds.
I can't help it. When I see Garland's picture all I can think of is "Stork"
I ponder on how close that clown got to the Supreme Court.
Wow you aren't kidding
He looks like Judge Doom.
So are these prisoners guilty of something more serious than trespassing and assault? Asking for the J6 protestors?
While left wing media propagandists continue to exclusively accuse and blame the GOP for gerrymandering districts (to benefit their own party), left wing Democrats have done far more egregious gerrymandering in blue states.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/22/another-pro-impeachment-republican-punished-in-redistricting/
Reminds me of an old joke that goes something like
"If the news media doesn't report an important story, it never happened?"
Good. Democrats should do more.
It almost seems like Brandon is a fucking idiot with government employee idiots implementing his idiocy.
It's a college-to-legislation pipeline for interns.
This administration being completely divorced from reality was entirely expected; ivory towers all around.
OT did rednecks kill Kill All Rednecks?
Doxxing gets one banned.
How can someone get banned? Just create a webmail address and then a new account. I've got certain assholes on mute who attack me with a new account every week (which I then mute).
Poor baby gets attacked every day! And keeps coming back for more!
It is not my fault this comment section has been hijacked by Republican fanatics with thin skin and bruised egos pretending to be libertarians. The concept of discussing anything without resorting to insults is beyond them. I act accordingly.
You act like a bitch.
Right, and Tulpa replicating my display name over and over again is an example of what? Good faith dialogue?
It's a standard example of the only kind of attention you now get after having alienated everyone in your life with your alcoholism and TDS.
Why are you surprised? You've been an unmitigated fuckup for years. Nothing is new.
He/him is a bitch
ah yes. yes it does.
Yes. He had a sock that still posts. I believe he originally changed names with the KAR account but like a girl’s hair near Biden, it got sniffed out.
dbruce showed up sometimes after KAR disappeared. Just saying.
So pretty much they will become the first to test the protocol for the unvaxxed?
https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/22/the-corporate-media-freakout-over-the-omicron-variant-isnt-normal-its-psychotic/
Cat's out of the bag and they're gonna lose a lot of skin trying to get it back in.
Shitton of Xanax lady is everywhere!
Behold Merrick Garland: life has kicked the shit out of him, and you can see it in his face.
"this is all the laid I'll ever get?"
I don't know whether the old or new interpretation of Congress's statutes are correct.
Would Congress have acted wisely *if* it authorized the Bureau of Prisons to make wider use of home confinement? Very likely yes, because some of these sentences are excessive and mitigating these sentences would be the next best thing to having lower sentences to begin with.
The federal prisoners released to home confinement are mainly old, with co-morbid conditions that make COVID dangerous for them, and are convicted on non-violent offenses. I looked up some cases for my state and found the following types of drug, arms, white-collar or immigration types of offenses:
-Conspiracy to commit honest services mail fraud; conspiracy to commit wire fraud; money laundering; tax evasion
-False representation of a Social Security number
-Felon in possession of firearms and ammunition
-Conspiracy to import methylone; importation of methylone; possession with intent to distribute methylone; possession of a controlled substance by an inmate
-Knowingly transferring a firearm to a felon
The site had the vast majority of applications DENIED release to home confinement. No murderers, rapists etc. on the list.
oh good, just mail fraud and identity theft then. we're safe.
You're a terrible libertarian.
Interestingly, over 100bn of Covid relief money was frausulently distributed. Many fraudulent applications came from prison.
This has nothing at all to do with Saint Joe's clemency, of course.
Biden continues to pay off people with student loans (who are far more likely to vote Democrat), while ignoring the financial plight of Americans who owe credit card loans, home mortgages, automobile and business loans (because the latter include many or mostly Republicans).
https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-extends-student-loan-payment-pause-another-90-days-11640195739
I've managed to pay off my credit cards with my Social Security checks.
This is my question as well. The internet left are all demanding $50,000 cash from Biden, and they won't even register as Democrats or promise to vote for them in the midterms.
On the one hand, you have a constituency that has every right to look after its own interests and use its political leverage. On the other hand, they offer this as some sort of social moral imperative. But as you point out, canceling only that debt while leaving all other debts intact is a choice to skew the economy in a certain way.
Credit card debt and car loans are, if anything, more of a "must have" than college debt, which they all chose to go into with the expectation that it would have a financial return. Sure, college should be free, but so should healthcare, and are we canceling medical debt?
You’re a terrible libertarian.
Medical debt is the #1 reason for personal bankruptcies in the US. So, in a way, we are cancelling medical debt.
If the prisoners have served over 2 years behind bars, will they be able to tell the difference anyway?
Then there's always the inmates who are like "I really like going to prison at prison. In-person prison meetings are just more productive than Zoom prison meetings, and they have those fun group lunches."
Meanwhile... What could possibly go wrong?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-congresswoman-defund-police-carjacked-in-crime-surging-philadelphia
I also note the ethnicity of the criminals isn't published elsewhere. Maybe they were Obama's sons?
It’s sad.