New York Times Writer Sarah Jeong Says Inflation in the News Is Just 'Rich People Flipping Their Shit'
Are normal Americans worried about inflation? Jeong says nope, it's a ginned-up outrage because rich people's "parasitic assets aren’t doing as well as they’d like."

Earlier today, New York Times opinion contributor* Sarah Jeong tweeted:
all the stuff you see about inflation in the news is driven by rich people flipping their shit because their parasitic assets aren't doing as well as they'd like and they're scared that unemployment benefits + stimmy checks + 15 minimum wage + labor shortage is why ~jmt~
— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) November 17, 2021
This is patently false for a few notable reasons: Inflation is most definitely not a manufactured media narrative, but rather a real, agreed-upon thing that is happening (though the Biden administration irresponsibly insists it's transitory). The consumer price index indicates that, from last September to this September, Americans have seen beef prices rise by 18 percent; gas prices by 42 percent; furniture prices by 11 percent; electricity prices by 5 percent; and used car prices by 24 percent. Consumer prices for October, the most recent month for which is there is data, jumped by 6.2 percent compared to what they were a year prior—the highest year-over-year jump we've seen in three decades!
It is not ginned-up outrage spurred along by rich people either. In fact, wealthy people who have invested heavily in the stock market are, by and large, doing quite well right now, contra Jeong's claim. (Bitcoin, too, has seen extraordinary growth over the last year, but is down this week.) Homeowners, rich and less rich alike, might even stand to benefit from inflation; those who have secured low-interest fixed-rate loans from the bank are the real potential winners, given that they're insulated from landlords raising rents on them while being locked into the amount they have to pay back to the bank. Though their asset keeps rising in value, their monthly payments stay the same over time.
This is idiotic. Asset prices have risen sharply. Inflation is squeezing at the middle of the income spectrum; wage growth is outpacing inflation at the bottom, and people at the top are enjoying asset price spikes. https://t.co/aYqTgqGVBh
— Josh Barro (@jbarro) November 17, 2021
Inflation is not a frivolous concern created by panicking, self-interested rich people; nor are rich people currently "flipping their shit" because their assets aren't doing as well as they'd like. Inflation is something that's making things significantly harder for the non–"pajama class"—those roughly 79 percent of workers (estimates vary) who do not work remotely, but must commute to their in-person jobs day in and day out, incurring the burden that comes with the rising price of gas. It's something that's making it significantly harder for families to feed their kids. It's something that's throwing a wrench in some people's plans to travel for the holidays, as rental cars and hotel rooms have gotten a good deal pricier than before. And it's something many Americans probably don't appreciate being lied to about, by either Jeong or the Biden administration, which insists, time and time again, that this inflation is transitory, implying it's really just a minor blip on the radar that will bounce back to normal in no time at all.
Though some Americans are "lying flat," taking a cue from the (perhaps overhyped) Chinese trend of highly educated, upper middle class millennials opting out of the workforce entirely, and others are bolstered by child tax credits and stimulus-lined savings accounts, many are dealing with real fears about how inflation affects their budgets. They deserve to be taken seriously.
Assets are actually doing very well and stocks are booming. The rich are doing very well right now.
But gas and food are becoming a lot harder to get for average people. We're especially seeing that out here in Hawaii https://t.co/qRYitNiZkR https://t.co/fj4qTvppWS
— Kevin Knodell (@KJKnodell) November 17, 2021
https://twitter.com/NellieBowles/status/1461047835919405056?s=20
1-year Performance
S&P 500: +30%
Real Estate: +28%
Bitcoin: +240%Rich people love inflation — they own assets.
But it's also an artificial tax that disproportionally impacts lower-income families at a greater rate & robs them of their purchasing power.
This isn't hard. https://t.co/tTcVzIU84O
— Joe Pompliano (@JoePompliano) November 17, 2021
You may remember Jeong from her prior instances of ill-advised tweeting, which presented a wrinkle when the Times hired her as a tech writer back in 2018. Those tweets, from 2013 and 2014 when she was 25 or 26, read: "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy i get out of being cruel to old white men" and "are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins." Jeong has long been hobbled by her extremely online style of tweeting—ironic detachment coupled with racial generalizations against disfavored groups like white men—which is fashionable among certain sets on the left.
For Jeong, this is par for the course. But choosing flippant tweeting over thoughtful analysis is a bad look for New York Times contributors* who really ought to be more concerned with the plights of everyday Americans forced to tighten the purse strings for reasons far beyond their control.
*CORRECTION: Jeong is a contributor for the Times.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's almost like she's dumbass who doesn't know what she's talking about, doesn't care to get educated, and merely exists to spew dumb and inflammatory talking points.
The Paper Of Record.
Well, if it means anything, ALL media seems to be just like that anymore.
So, yeah. Emulate the Grey Lady.
It’s jeong the pale.
Just a quick reminder that this is the same pernicious bitch who literally wrote the book on how the left can justify online censorship of wrongthink with "Internet of Garbage."
Didn't she also make some outrageously racist comment at some point? Can't remember what it was exactly.
Christ, what a cunt.
Earlier today, New York Times opinion columnist Sarah Jeong tweeted-
Stop right there.
Too bad you didn't stop your italics tag right there.
Before we go any further. Do you love me?
So now I’m praying for the end of time
to hurry up and arrive
Because if I have to spend another minute with you, I don’t think that I can really survive.
will you love me forever?
While waiting for my allergy meds to kick in I stayed up late last night watching "reaction" videos on YouTube (I know, I know...most are fake as hell, but the music is good) including young people watching Meatloaf's MTV video from his live performance of that. It was funny, and a little depressing, watching a lot of them struggle to understand the baseball reference and how it applied.
"Inflation is most definitely not a manufactured media narrative"
Actually according to this comment section's leading economics expert, it's exactly that.
#InflationIsAWingnutMyth
The only real problem anyone is concerned with is the 10¢ increase in the price of spittin’ tobaccy.
I’m disappointed Liz didn’t include this in her article.
We need our own Reason Commentariat Cost Of Living Adjustment index. We can call it RC Cola or something like that.
Take the average of the 3 leading brands of smokeless tobacco (Skoal, Copenhagen, ?), per pouch, and track that over time. Then we'll know what the REAL impact of these temporary supply chain price disruptions is on people.
We need our own Reason Commentariat Cost Of Living Adjustment index. We can call it RC Cola or something like that.
Figure out something else that results in the acronym "MOON PIE" and you'll be good to go.
Twitter is merely the Jeong Show.
where they Chuck Bury the truth?
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/08/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-anti-white-racism.html - Andrew Sullivan
"though the Biden administration irresponsibly insists it's transitory"
As opposed to claiming that it's permanent? Everything is transitory dude. In the end, we'll all be dead.
There is no reason to think that so-called inflation is being caused by anything other than goods shortages caused by the supply chain hiccups caused by the pandemic. Inflation is up by roughly the same amount everywhere in the world. Every country is experiencing 30-year highs in inflation. Every country in the world did not send stimmy checks.
The political question is interesting, and I hope Republicans definitely run on telling Americans that they want to take their stimmy money back.
The broader question is even more interesting: how much longer can Republicans sell economic scare stories as an excuse to cut public benefits.
Wake me when you guys support one economic intervention that doesn't redistribute wealth upward. Because you are essentially endorsing government intervention in what is a very plain supply and demand phenomenon.
"Wake me when you guys support one economic intervention that doesn't redistribute wealth upward."
Opposition to lockdowns is an enormous policy that prevents the redistribution of wealth from poor to rich.
"Because you are essentially endorsing government intervention in what is a very plain supply and demand phenomenon."
Tell me you don't understand how inflation works without telling me you don't understand how inflation works
Silly of me to ask a libertarian I'm sure, but do you understand how supply and demand work?
Silly of you to ask anybody to the right of a socialist to agree with your financial fantasies.
Not all of us can handle such pristine logic as "supply creates demand, and by supply we mean give rich people more money."
Not all of us can handle such pristine logic as "supply creates demand...
Except, the reason the U.S. economy is in the particular mess it's in right now is that you and your political allies think that demand creates its own supply. The situation we're in was predictable. In fact, many of us predicted it. Now, you're engaged in the Inflation Five-Step (aka "The Full Krugman"):
Step 1) There is no damn inflation!
Step 2) OK, there’s a little inflation, but it’s transitory and will go back to normal any day now.
Step 3) OK, the inflation might be around a little longer than we thought, but it’s not as bad as it was under Jimmy Carter and early Reagan.
Step 4) Rising inflation is actually good for you, and here’s the explanation why you dummies.
Step 5) Just shut up, learn to make do with less, and enjoy life in your “fundamentally transformed” America. You don’t really need all that crap anyway.
Step 3) OK, the inflation might be around a little longer than we thought, but it’s not as bad as it was under Jimmy Carter and early Reagan.
I've heard people actually making that argument, which I tend to reply to by noting that the current pandemic is no big deal then because it's not as bad as the Black Death.
Well Tony IS a verified idiot, so expecting any better is a fool's errand.
I have explained perfectly clearly that the supposed problem is that the global supply chain of goods has been disrupted by a rapid change in global circumstances, i.e., the pandemic.
I say "supposed" because I can still get nearly anything shipped to my porch within a couple days, including my new computer, which would explode the heads of any human who died more than 20 years ago.
Maybe I'm just not a whiny little bitch who can't handle the slightest disruption in my routine during a global pandemic. I don't know, who can say?
"supply creates demand...
Hell, that's just
Say's Law
Nailed it!
You sure as fuck don't Tony, and you've proven that with this very issue.
You clearly don't.
Opposition to lockdowns was a good answer, so better ignore it, I guess. Whatever you think about their necessity, the lockdowns and forced business closures have brought about the greatest upward transfer of wealth that has ever happened.
And what intervention are libertarians supporting that redistributes wealth upward? Stopping giving away free money doesn't count.
So you agree that climate change is transitory and therefore no big deal, right?
Not being a climatologist, I'd recommend going and reading up on the science. Wikipedia is a good place to start.
Lol @wikipedia
It cites its sources.
It's worth actually following up on those sources to see what they say, and how they go about substantiating what they say.
Indeed. By now, any major subject will be rigorously cited and painstakingly written. The science stuff goes into way too much detail for an encyclopedia, if you ask me.
No, they argue and dismiss counter sources. To such a point wikis founder said wiki is now bullshit.
Parts of it are fine, but on anything that's politically controversial they're garbage.
There are enon controversial parts that have ended up the same way. Basic non political biographies.
They do okay on the math concepts but even there of you read some discussions on it they are insane.
It's so much better than what he was envisioning. A rare internet success story. Maybe even a decentralized governing model that could be applied to social media.
It's important to have central authorities for facts. People are unfortunately given to believing whatever bullshit they want to believe.
I see you dont understand how wiki actually works.
They've fully embraced censorship of wrongthink.
So why not recommend those sources instead?
http://www.nature.com
http://www.noaa.gov
There's two. Too pop-sci for you?
Notice. Tony didn't link yo any actual articles, just an appeal to authority. One that ignores counter studies as well.
It's a non-fallacious appeal to authority. Wherever you go for information about science, go there. If you think some fields of science have been walled off and commandeered by nefarious forces impervious to the scientific method and leaks, then by all means, see a psychiatrist.
How do you know which sources to trust for science? Whatever makes you feel funny in your special place?
It is completely fallacious. Both journals have had many retraction. Both have admitted to pulling a study due to pressure from editors and others.
Ah, so they have standards.
Where do you get your information about climate change from, again? Be specific.
Wokepedia
Not being a climatologist, I'd recommend going and reading up on the science.
So . . . are you saying all things are transitory except climate change, regarding which you need to defer to an authority, who may or may not back you up on that, you're not really sure?
Climate change is terminal. I suppose that's another way of saying the biosphere is transitory. But we should eventually start worrying about things that we all agree matter, like the species surviving itself, don't you think?
That's silly doom shit. Climate change is a problem people will have to deal with. But we're not going to stop it and people will manage.
Wake me when you guys support one economic intervention that doesn't redistribute wealth upward.
Because not robbing the rich and giving to the poor is the exact same thing as taking from the poor and giving to the rich.
You can infuse whatever arbitrary moral fixations onto the situation that you like. My own moral sense says that there's no excuse to let a child starve if you can provide her with food.
Your politics would let that child starve over taxing Elon Musk 1 cent. Correct? So tell me more about your moral fixations.
Nobody starves in America. In America poor people are fat.
It's kind of a metaphor.
I suppose you think American poors are fat because America randomly has the laziest people on earth, huh?
It can't be because it has the most generous social welfare state, because last time I checked Norwegians were all thin and hot.
Do you agree that poor people in America are fat?
If so then your starving child argument is obviously dishonest.
They are fat, and I know why. It's not because they are living so well.
They are fat, and I know why. It's not because they are living so well.
It's because they're starving?
No, it's capitalism of course.
Big Sugar convincing generations that it's not protein and nutrients you want for breakfast, why it's a bowl full of sugar!
The benefits of scale enjoyed by producers of cheap high-calorie meals (complete with Big Gulps full of sugar, of course), which are often the only viable option for busy people with little money.
Henry Ford strong-arming the country into a WALL-E dystopia where, if you don't live in a city with public transport already in place, you spend roughly 0% of your day getting any exercise.
First time in human history that the greatest health threat to the poor is obesity. Must be Trump's fault.
Obesity during the Trump administration wasn’t all rosie.
Nah, it's clearly because in the 1970s and 1980s, Americans en masse spontaneously started becoming incredibly lazy and morally deficient.
We have all the Dollar Stores and their HFCS-laden boxed foods!
Fucking sexy Norwegian chicks eat grilled fish all the time.
You need to stop fantasizing over all these fad diets that say you can eat as much food as you want as long as its the "right" food. The way to lose weight is to eat less. Period. If people are fat its because they eat more than they need to. Period.
My diet is less than healthy. Definitely don't avoid fat. And I remain slim, as I've been my whole life, without trying. I simply eat what's in front of me. I do not eat to the point of fullness. You don't have to keep eating until you can't eat anymore, you can simply eat until you're not hungry.
If you eat the right stuff, then your appetite will be naturally satiated. Low Carb/High Fat is a proper human diet. No will power is required.
No, Tony, what he said is just a simple fact. Not giving people something is not the same thing as taking from them.
Not on an emotional level, perhaps, but I think governments should be run as rationally as possible.
I think governments should be run as rationally as possible.
No, you don't. You're a lefturd.
-jcr
How many children have you provided with food? I'm sure there are some hungry children somewhere. You seem to be failing your moral sense. There's no excuse, after all. You said so.
There is no reason to think that so-called inflation is being caused by anything other than goods shortages caused by the supply chain hiccups caused by the pandemic.
I know what will fix it! Pumping more cash into the economy!
And who is advocating for that right now?
INFRASTRUCTURE!
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Roughly speaking, those are paid for. Do you know what you're talking about or are you just repeating bumper stickers you saw on cable news while in a semi-conscious half-nap?
If programs are paid for with taxes, then nobody's printing any extra money.
Now you're just being obtuse. No one thinks that the whole big spending package is paid for by taxes. And everyone knows that when they claim it is, they are using accounting tricks that never reflect what ends up happening in reality.
So much simpler to mute the idiots instead of trying to educate them, especially those intent on remaining ignorant like Tony.
That's true, but that's not your real complaint. The CBO nonsense also doesn't take into account known unknowns about economic growth. We can't predict the bounty that will come from clean energy or any number of other provisions. It's all guesswork.
And it doesn't even matter anyway because a federal budget deficit is exactly equivalent to a private-sector surplus, being that the federal government is the entity that prints money.
Just say what you're for and against. You can do that without falling back on nonsense economics.
... Joe Biden? Bernie Sanders? Nancy Pelosi? Basically every Democrat not named "Manchin"? Christ man, you could at least try.
Get the last handler back here. You're as bad as the new Stroozle.
I think Tony fails to recognize sarcasm
If only. They're still in "pay for" mode where new programs have to be offset with a coincident policy of raising some people's taxes. It's what Republicans used to call fiscal responsibility before they went completely insane.
If only.
"Nobody is advocating for pumping even more money into the economy. But that's exactly what's needed."
Roughly speaking, those are paid for.
What's $2.5T in new debt matter anyway? We're already over the cliff.
Uhh, there's another pretty important part to fiscal responsibility.
Letting all the roads and bridges rot until they're REALLY expensive to fix?
And who is advocating for that right now?
It's literally what Biden is arguing will fix inflation.
Clearly the Biden administration does not believe that loose monetary policy is the solution to loose monetary policy. So why don't you try again.
...except they clearly DO.
Nobody claimed anybody in the admin was all that intelligent.
"So-called" inflation is my favorite part. As if it's not really happening.
I prefer to use language in a way that clarifies rather than obfuscates. Most Americans couldn't define inflation technically, but most could say that gas and milk are more expensive than they were two years ago.
Since the only thing we're actually talking about is the price of goods being up (thanks to supply and demand), why use this ratfucked terminology?
Is it because you want the idiots who vote Republican to be scared of yet another thing they couldn't possibly describe or understand? Because it's been such a winning political formula for 40 years?
Inflation is simple math: too many dollars chasing too few goods.
Injecting government dollars into the economy while not creating any actual wealth is the definition of inflation.
Monetary inflation, yes, but there's no reason to believe that stimulus checks are causing current prices, especially since, as I explained, inflation is up everywhere in the world.
I do hope Republicans intend to carry the logic to its conclusion and run for office promising to take away people's stimulus checks. Perhaps they could garnish everyone's paycheck?
Ummm... I'm sorry dude but I can't respond to that. There's just too much stupid, and to break it down point by point... No, not worth the effort. Good night dude.
You always say something like this when I make a great point.
But he did say it and you've yet to make a good point
inflation is up everywhere in the world
Biden's fault, of course.
It's almost like prices are catching up after The (worldwide) Great Economic Collapse of 2008 and all the subsequent years of loose monetary policy.
Of course that is the HAPERINFLATION narrative.
Or it could be a worldwide re-opening bump.
"HAPERINFLATION, plus muh SMOKELESS TOBACCO!!!"
Hey Shrike, have you ever thought of switching to nicotine gum?
"inflation is up everywhere in the world."
Of course the US Dollar isn't a reserve currency for any other nations, so its not like anything we do can affect another country, and since we were the only country to give out stimulus checks during the pandemic it's clearly not a problem with our monetary policy
Oh yeah, I just said you can't recognize sarcasm. So we are clear, that was extreme sarcasm
I'm not sure I follow, but OK, I'll put you down for being in favor of Republicans running a political campaign on taking back everyone's stimulus check.
How dare they campaign on a hotly debated policy issue!!!
This guys has spent the last decade castigating inflation hawks because the absurd expansion in money supply never quite made it onto store shelves (not officially, anyway; sure the bags of chips are smaller for the same price, but that doesn't count).
But now that it's run out of assets to bubble (on the Democrats' watch and with no small assist from their relief and labor policies) it's just some Faux News myth.
How did Democrats cause prices to rise in Europe and Asia?
Doesn't really matter. More government spending is going to make it worse, not fix it, because the government can't make there be more goods, only more money.
But don't you believe that giving more money to rich people will cause them to produce more goods?
Who the fuck is giving money to rich people?
https://www.occrp.org/en/coronavirus/europes-covid-19-spending-spree-unmasked
Stop being an idiot Tony.
He can’t.
The point isn't that the inflation that's happening is solely the Democrats' fault; it obviously isn't. The point is that they're doing everything possible to exacerbate the situation, while denying that this downside (which is already happening) is even a possibility. It's retarded, and you have to be the blindest of partisans not to understand that.
The CARES act was justifiable. The next several sprees weren't; including and especially the one they're currently debating, which is likely to also prove a huge drag on future productivity.
Tony's argument is he thinks most people are as stupid as he is. Lol.
I know what will fix it! Pumping more cash into the economy!
Cash pumping scorecard:
Trump = $3.3 trillion in handouts
Biden = $3.1 trillion in handouts and infrastructure
Biden's catching up!
Is there some kind of timeframe for those numbers?
He's only got a little over 3 years to close to gap, maybe he can make it!
Wake me when you guys support one economic intervention that doesn't redistribute wealth upward.
Physician, heal thyself.
I've proposed executing Elon Musk, stealing his money, and paying for the infrastructure bill. As a thought experiment. My commie credentials are on the table.
He doesn't have any money. He's got stock in Telsa.
So your plan would be to execute him, convert his stock into money, and then feed your unicorn.
Problem is, who's gonna buy the stock? The buyer will be your next murder victim. Nobody's gonna do that.
In a way, it would just be returning the money to the government, since Elon Musk would be a friendless ex-CEO living on ramen noodles if not for all the government bailout money he took.
Not sure if I would go that far, but the guy is talented at getting pork.
He made way more money than you could ever dream of before he was involved in his current businesses.
So suck his cock and then take half his wealth for taxes.
Ahh. Envy is your real problem.
More like a wistfulness. I could do so much more interesting things with quarter trillion dollars than that basic bitch.
The person who asks for the money is dramatically less guilty than the person who gives it to him/her.
Elon can only ask for money. DC is the criminal for giving it to him.
Not to mention that if Musk tried to sell all of his Tesla stock, the price would fall a lot. Just because an asset is valued at a certain price doesn't mean it can easily be converted to the same amount of cash.
And Tony thinks he understands supply and demand.
Not to mention, even if Elon Musk's entire net worth were liquid and available for confiscating, he's only worth a bit over $250 billion.
You're going to have to scale that infrastructure bill way the hell back, or find about a dozen more Elon Musk's to murder.
Given the performance of lefties in Kenosha, I think it's best you sit a few rounds of executions out, lest you give an excuse to people who are a lot better than you at that sort of thing.
My commie credentials are on the table.
Robbing some random rich dude and giving his money to government cronies =/= communism. At least not Marx's communism, but it is, as you say, 'real-world' communism, which I've always been told isn't really communism.
To me, communism is merely a utopian ideal to strive for. A north star, if you will.
You can start achieving your dream by giving up all of your private property, if you have accumulated anything.
Do you even have any idea about the "ideal" communists want to achieve? People don't want to live that way. Even the ideal Marxist society would be an awful place to live. There's a lot more to life than people having what they need.
You're right. So why not find out what people do with their time once their basic needs are met?
… says everyone below average.
Wake me when you guys support one economic intervention that doesn't redistribute wealth upward.
Dude, you and and the neo-feudalists in Silicon Valley are both on the same team.
There is no reason to think that so-called inflation is being caused by anything other than goods shortages caused by the supply chain hiccups caused by the pandemic.
And not at all by the multiple multi-trillion-dollar stimulus packages. Okay....
Not to mention that the pandemic hardly affected the price of any items, except maybe N95 masks. The other disruptions were caused by government lockdown edicts.
Also odd how this inflation held out until early this year after Biden's first "Stimulus" bill hit. After a year of insane spending, more did not seem to be the medicine they believed.
Now they want to investigate oil companies for high gas prices and not, say, blocking drilling for oil on federal lands and shutting down pipelines.
National currencies could also be floundering because of competition from cryptocurrencies, if the phenomenon is as global as Tony describes it.
Americans have seen beef prices rise by 18 percent; gas prices by 42 percent; furniture prices by 11 percent; electricity prices by 5 percent; and used car prices by 24 percent.
So if you travel by train n NY City and eat sushi there is no inflation?
Sarah is correct!
Has the dry cleaner that gets the stains out of your clown suit raised prices?
Dumb cunt
She's not traveling on a steam train, dude...
The chattering class wouldn't know if average people are concerned about inflation. They doesn't speak to such people: they consider them beneath consideration.
Gas costs 170% what it did just 12 months ago.
Are normal Americans worried about inflation? Jeong says nope
Like she knows or would associate with normal Americans.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10213921/How-QAnon-Shaman-went-math-club-member-high-school-embracing-wacky-conspiracies.html
The life story of Nardz's idol.
Dude spent ten months in solidary confinment and was sentenced to three years in jail for a misdemeanor charge of "parading" and "interfering with Congress".
You can say what you want to Sarc, but don't pretend like you support "criminal justice reform" when you find that to be funny. You're just a standard white progressive like the writers here, which is obviously shameful and embarrassing.
Didn't you say you got railroaded with some legal troubles before? Seems like you didn't learn anything from your experience.
Should I call you JesseAz being that you're having a grand time expecting me to defend things I never said nor did?
Go fuck yourself. With something square.
He is 100% correct you ignorant anti libertarian fuck.
Everyone else is a jerk except poor sarcasmic.
Hey sarc, how many people are on your enemies list now? 60? 80? 100?
Have you ever thought about who the common factor factor is in all your troubles here?
Show me where I said his treatment by the legal system was funny.
Show me where I said his sentence was appropriate.
Show me where I said he was treated fairly.
You can't, because I never said anything of the sort.
So now you're just a troll fishing for reactions by accusing me of things I never said nor did, just like the minions I have on mute.
Again, go fuck yourself. Use sand for lube.
>>sand
in ATL they spell it cocaine
So now you're just a troll fishing for reactions by accusing me of things I never said nor did, just like the minions I have on mute.
It's amusing he pretends trolling for reactions is such an offense it justifies muting, but he also brags about he trolls this site for reactions.
Sometimes it seems he he invents standards to attack his enemies but applies none to himself.
Do I single people out, accuse them of things they never said nor did, and then call them liars when they defend themselves?
I don't think I do that. When I do, let me know. And until then I'll keep telling people to get fucked when they do that to me.
Do I single people out, accuse them of things they never said nor did, and then call them liars when they defend themselves?
Since none of this addresses the issue it can best be summed up as "yes I do the same thing I accused them of, but now I want to accuse them of other stuff. So let's pretend I didn't make a big deal of them doing exactly what I do."
So you've got nothing. Gotcha.
I don't doubt you convinced yourself that's a reasonable summary. Your ability to misunderstand reality to protect your delicate psyche is unmatched.
Yes. All the time. See here
https://reason.com/2021/10/28/sen-ted-cruz-nazi-salute-first-amendment-merrick-garland/?comments=true#comment-9181532
sarcasmic
October.28.2021 at 5:00 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
If pointing out the implications of his own words is attacking him, then yes I've been attacking him.
He said Republicans are authoritarians, that Democrats are totalitarians, and that we should vote for Republicans because totalitarians are worse than authoritarian.
I pointed out that that equals supporting authoritarians and he got mad. If you call that a personal attack then there's something wrong with you, not me. I've never said anything personal about the guy. Ever.
More:
sarcasmic
October.30.2021 at 2:35 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
Watching him play Russian Roulette would be a lot more fun.
I mean you literally singled put Nardi in your post dummy.
Then lies by pretending he doesn’t think it’s funny.
*Nardz
Pet name for you
Flatterer
And sarc realizes his first post is in no way libertarian and is just him showing leftist virtue signaling.
What message would it send to suddenly be interested in criminal justice reform when it's a terrorist who tried to murder Congress?
Let's find a more sympathetic defendant, then use that as a sob story in our very sincere criminal justice reform efforts.
Murder Congress (with no weapons).
Literally nobody said they were intelligent criminals.
Said the guy who proposes the execution and robbing of Elon Musk.
As a thought experiment.
Sick.
"a terrorist who tried to murder Congress?" Never heard him described quite that way. Probably because nobody else is stupid enough to do so.
Think of what else you could be doing with the time you're spending defending a mentally ill hillbilly who participated in an attempted violent insurrection against your government. Is Timothy McVeigh too dead for you?
...says the guy whose "side" martyrs such guiding lights of greatness as Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Jacob Blake...
So you two are living parallel lives.
And saved as sarc praises the federal government getting 4 years for a non violent action.
Eat a bullet, sarc, you and everybody you know will be happier.
Cheering fucking totalitarianism like a good little soy.
Yes, the New York Time is largely staffed now by unprofessional, race and class obsessed, left wing, overeducated skulls full of mush.
>>This is patently false for a few notable reasons:
1. Sarah Jeong is professionally full of shit.
... and a dumb leftist cunt, but I repeat myself.
Progressives work hard to be the dumbest people in recorded human history. People this stupid would have starved to death prior to the welfare state.
The people most committed to a political ideology are those incapable of being productive leaving politics as their only path to financial security.
Or they're some Ivy League networked POS like her.
I'm not sure why you think Ivy Leaguers are precluded from being unproductive.
Progressives work hard to be the dumbest people in recorded human history. People this stupid would have starved to death prior to the welfare state.
They're not dumb. They have more street smarts than their always-capitulating and always-compromising opposition. They want to rule and they don't even care if it's hell that they'll be ruling over.
We are so dumb that we can't even acknowledge that we been outsmarted.
Conservatives (possibly including libertarians but I can't say for sure) have always stood for high-minded principle. Leftists have always stood for power. We never adapted to the tactics of the left. We cannot even bring ourselves to acknowledge that golden-rule morality can be turned against us by people who don't honor it themselves. We're toast now.
^
They don't have 'street smarts,' they simply lack integrity and are willing to go to win any means necessary. For the vast majority of progressives, the ends justify the means, the game is zero sum, and all causes are mono-causal. There are no 'smarts' involved, they are dim, venal, and driven by emotion.
+1
Not so long ago this is what I would have expected from The Onion; and yet it is from a publication of record and it seems to be just fine with it. And if it isn't, they aren't about to take on someone who will claim on one hand that Asians are not a victim class and on the other be outraged whenever it suits them.
Keep it up; just hammer away until we are driven apart.
"Not so long ago this is what I would have expected from The Onion; and yet it is from a publication of record and it seems to be just fine with it."
Says it all, really. Imagine what they'll write tomorrow.
The Associated Press
Wed, November 17, 2021, 3:22 PM·1 min read
Benchmark U.S. crude oil for December delivery fell $2.40 to $78.36 a barrel Wednesday.
Oil fell sharply again today.
The reopening bump may be over now.
Transitory, bitches!
More money for your chewin’ tabacky and NAMBLA Free Jared fund.
Hey. And idiot who doesn't know the difference between crude and refined.
Yeah, I guess, if by "rich people", you mean people who pay for their own groceries and gas.
Most of the population of the US is rich compared to the rest of the world's.
They're working on that, Mickey.
GLOBAL EQUITY!!!
Yeah, I guess, if by "rich people", you mean people who pay for their own groceries and gas.
That's what really makes this a 'let them cake' kind of moment.
She thinks she's being an influencer because people who read the NYT will nod along, thinking the Poors just don't really understand what's really going on.
But in the real world, guess who notices the inflation first before everybody else does?
Americans forced to tighten the purse strings for reasons far beyond their control
Far beyond their control? They elected these people!
Buried in this story is a nugget of hope, imo.
Americans, especially American conservatives, can't handle even the slightest hiccup in their never-ending quest to consume Cheetos and Big Gulps. All the death and misery that came from the pandemic--presumably that simply doesn't compute. No, their real concern is masks and milk being a dollar more expensive than it was two years ago.
Yet they think they want revolution. What kidders. They've made us all pay attention to their incessant whiny tantrums over everything from hygiene to Mr. Potato Head. They can't handle the real shocks to the system that come with revolution. They can't handle there being no jobs or no police or their bank accounts suddenly becoming worthless. They can't even handle a Toni Morrison book.
"We want only 100% of a world we are comfortable with, and any slight deviation will cause us to riot and overturn the system!"
Yeah. Makes sense. *Pats conservatives on the head*
I read what the actual source of the controversy over the Toni Morrison book. Apparently, a high school student was assigned it in class and the graphic depictions of rape and infanticide was giving the student nightmares. It frankly sounded more like a woke person getting triggered. I don't know what the politics of the family involved is, but I am not too sure they would be traditionally what thou g he of as conservative. Also, there may be some genuine criticism that that book may be inappropriate to make a required reading assignment.
Also, there may be some genuine criticism that that book may be inappropriate to make a required reading assignment.
^ For college, sure, but not high school. If the school doesn't think high school kids can handle the fart jokes in Chaucer, Beloved maybe shouldn't even be on campus.
I got recurring nightmares for a year after screening A Nightmare on Elm Street a few years too young. I'm convinced that this pseudo-trauma informs my personality to this day. Of course, Wes Craven doesn't have a Nobel prize.
So far, the revolutionaries of Kenosha are down 0-3.
Is this a seven game series? I’m not sure they have a fresh arm.
*slow clap*
Somehow I doubt Gaige Grosskreutz is ambidextrous.
He has been confused with many slot machines as of late.
They can't handle the real shocks to the system that come with revolution. They can't handle there being no jobs or no police or their bank accounts suddenly becoming worthless.
And just to be clear, you're implying that this doesn't describe the Defund the Police rioters that spent last summer burning things down?
So, Square, you seem awfully eager to dismiss the civil rights issues behind that movement. I'm sure you feel it's unfortunate that massive demonstrations in favor of basic civil equality for black people have been overshadowed by some of the property destruction that happened. I'm sure we all agree that it would be a moral abomination to use such violence, some of which was caused by well-paid fascist interlopers, as an excuse to jettison any progress on basic civil rights for black people, such as the right not to be murdered by the state with impunity. We are libertarians, after all.
Perhaps their anger would be better directed at the Democrat politicians running the Democrat cities where the public employee unions make it exceedingly difficult to remove problem cops from street duty when it becomes clear they are unsuited for it.
As for basic civil rights, that battle was won long ago. Libertarians should be concerned about any agents of the state killing any civilian unnecessarily, but bad cops don't limit their bad actions to any particular race.
Huh. Haven't seen Tony in a while. You know shit must be hitting the fan when they're pulling socks out of retirement.
If Tony is the secret weapon, they're in deep, deep trouble.
I think at this point they're just spraying and praying.
Americans, especially American conservatives, can't handle even the slightest hiccup in their never-ending quest to consume Cheetos and Big Gulps.
Here you imply that if people would stop spending irresponsibly, they would be fine. The reality is that most things on the market are affected, some more than others. Persons not spending irresponsibly are still taking a hit. Not everyone has fat to cut.
Now let's talk about who is eating the junk food:
From nature:
One thing that is clear in high-income countries is that, despite decades of economic growth, obesity disproportionately affects the poor—the “poverty–obesity paradox” (Hruschka and Han, 2017). The proportion of obese individuals in industrialized nations now correlates inversely with median household income. This phenomenon is called the “reverse gradient” because it is the reverse of the pattern in developing countries, where higher income correlates with higher body mass. In the United States and other developed countries, lower income households tend to have higher rates of obesity (Hruschka, 2012; Subramanian et al., 2011).
In fact the median-income people you are crapping on are the least likely to be eating carb-laden junk food. Many of the poor now get food stamps to the tune of $251 per person/month, (compared to $121 per person/month before the pandemic). In many cases this will be supplemented by free breakfast and lunch for their children. If these people are employed and remain so, they may well be eating even more carbs than before.
My comment was about something else (revolution cosplay by people who complain about every minor inconvenience).
But sure, this is all true. There is a surface-level paradox in modern capitalist societies that the poor are obese. It need not be a paradox at all, considering being obese and starving are just two ways of being unhealthy. We're being informed by childishly simplistic notions of how diet and societies work.
The short version is that it's expensive to eat healthily, which is not all that surprising. It's only slightly less surprising that the poor in wealthy societies don't actually go without sufficient calories to live (if they did, we wouldn't be a wealthy society--or we'd be a very corrupt wealthy society with indefensible policies).
Also expensive, gym memberships.
The details are interesting to me, but absent from those details is any accounting for personal moral virtue. Any explanation for how generation after generation of poor people are morally bankrupt, and generation after generation of wealthy people are morally upstanding. It's just not a hypothesis that merits consideration.
Tony, you and your leftist buddies complain about every minor inconvenience.
The wealthy do not. We don’t have to.
The lefties I know go out of their way to wear a mask.
It's gauche and embarrassing for all concerned for you to boast about your wealth. Clearly you're new money.
Yes, Tony, I’m new money. First generation immigrant. Started from nothing. Proud of it too.
Tony, honey, the wealthy don’t consume a Cheetos and Big Gulps. We don’t keep our money in bank accounts. We don’t have to worry about inflation for our personal assets. Financially, we’re doing just fine under Biden.
We’d just like to have a decent country to live in, a country where 90% of the population doesn’t live in shit. Unfortunately, the American left is determined to bring about just that outcome.
The Minimum wage isn't keeping up with inflation.
yeah, a couple of years ago fast food joints in Silicon Valley had to pay 14 to 17 bucks an hour to find workers, with benefits and sign-on bonuses. Now that's the going rate in small Midwestern towns.
Brazil's version of Trump can't catch a break either!
Brazil nixes welfare expansion announcement amid currency sell-off
BRASILIA, Oct 19 (Reuters) - Brazil's government canceled an announcement for a generous new welfare program on Thursday, after a central bank currency intervention failed to calm market concerns about looser government spending ahead of next year's election.
President Jair Bolsonaro, who has seen his poll numbers fall over his mishandling of the pandemic, a weak economy and rising inflation, summoned ministers for a 5 p.m. announcement of the new welfare program, according to a document seen by Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/brazils-central-bank-sells-reserves-fiscal-fears-rattle-markets-2021-10-19/
So El Presidente was doing this Trump CARES Welfare Act and he got over-ruled by their version of Mitch McConnell/Jerome Powell.
Got to love gridlock! Brazillian style.
Will CNN cover Brazil's Trump, because we miss Trump, and CNN needs the ratings.
I don't know but if he loses his election the Pillow Guy should be down there and help him with his election fraud claims.
You can't put a wise head on Jeung shoulders.
was going to make head joke but her feed is so awful I might say no
I love those who trivialize inflation (usually those who spent none of their adult life living under such conditions) by calling it "transitory". I guess that means that it will end....sometime. I imagine that is true; just like war, pestilence, depressions, etc, are all also transitory. Thank goodness we don't have to worry about that stuff. And, of course, since it will end at some time I guess prices will eventually fall to pre-inflationary levels.
'fiat' has to adjust to resources. It's just a matter of how many resources were STOLEN in the shift. It's just another way to ROB the citizens of their belongings -- until the robbery becomes so excessive their labors are STOLEN before they can even collect (i.e. hyper-inflation).
Once the poor start decorating light posts with local politicians, the reality of the situation will be clear even to the dumb cunts like Jeong
Of course PRICES won't fall to pre-inflation levels but RATES eventually will. And we'll all hear how wonderful it is that inflation is back to ONLY 2 or 3%.
So you think people are better off under high deflation? Moderate deflation?
"The people" are better-off being *individually* in control of pricing (i.e. free markets). The laws of supply and demand isn't anymore negotiable than the law of gravity itself. And propped up objects will hit the ground harder the higher they're propped up and the consequences won't be pretty.
Yes, people are better off under deflation. Much better. All people.
Ironically; The rich sitting on ever-inflating assets aren't worried nearly as much about their minor bit of cash getting burned-out..
It's all those who are surviving on cash from work that are getting burned-out of their value. Those are the ones getting the short-end of the stick.
But I'm sure as long as the Nazi's call it 'Infrastructure' it'll all be better.
The rich (and well off) should be concerned.
Housing prices are being pushed artificially ever higher by the Fed interfering massively in the mortgage and bond markets (buying 40 billion a month in mortgage backed securities and 80 billion a month in Treasuries), keeping interest rates artificially low and making higher home prices "affordable", at least on a monthly payment basis.
The last time inflation was this high, mortgage rates were at 9.25%. Investors usually need to cover inflation (now 6%) plus a risk premium to lend someone money. If mortgage rates rise to even 6%, the housing market will implode worse than 2008, followed by the stock market, followed by the crypto market as everyone cashes in their chips to cover their leveraged losses.
And then, yes, inflation will be back under control, because it will be the worst depression since 1932.
There's absolutely zero chance of .Gov and the Fed, but I repeat myself, letting interest rates rise back to those levels. .Gov is constantly churning its debt, reissuing new instruments as old ones mature. Let interest rates rise up to, say, 5% on a 10-year T-bill, and see how much of the Federal Budget would be absorbed with merely making interest payments.
We're at the point where our household is making only the minimum payments on our credit cards, we've just about run out of new credit cards offering interest-free 90 days to roll the debt onto, and the missus got fired from two of her three minimum wage jobs because she kept calling in due to illness.
(I can't quickly think of a household metaphor for the petrodollar going away, but throw that in too.)
Bankruptcy court would be the next step, LOL. Although, it'd be hilarious watching---from the outside---the U.S. having to go through court-ordered credit counseling and personal finance classes.
No fraudulent transfer rules either when it's a nation declaring they're broke.
If it's really a matter of too much money in the economy then you could always tax rich money ever so slightly. But I don't believe there's too much money. The economy just needs to grow to meet the demand and that seems to be happening. Biden is actually doing a pretty damn good job with the hand he was dealt. As an example the minute he took office he threw vital support to families with that Earned Income Tax Credit. That is a huge deal for half the country. The stock market and corporate profits are also in record territory which is good too. We're saving billions every day because we left Afghanistan. Infrastructure spending has finally happened and we're all going to benefit from that. Biden is perfect for this reason too. He just sold the most oil and gas leases ever in the Gulf of Mexico but he also made a gigantic investment in the technology that will address climate change and future sustainable affordable energy. The price of oil and gas is unfortunately at the mercy of cartels and dictators. We need next level energy and Biden knows that. He's not in the pocket of oil companies like Republicana but he recognizes that those companies are vital to America's security even if they're dicks. We need them and we need to diversify. Let's go Joe! Fuck the fascists!
LMAO.... "with the hand he was dealt"
You mean the lowest unemployment since the 60s.
Or the Stronger USD.
Or the growing economy..
or, or, or, or
That somehow magically turned to SH*T-ON-A-STICK as soon as Biden and his Nazi's(National Socialists) took control.
Lefty ignorance know no boundaries.
You're actually completly incorrect about inheriting a good situation. He inherited a clusterfuck and intentional sabotage. You guys are bad for business and America.
Well, he did inherit an intentional sabotage. It's called the plandemic. That being said, I"m pretty sure the saboteur was China and not the republican party. To some extent the NIH I suppose.
You know it's bad for the progs when all the 50-centers are out. Even Tony is out of retirement for this one.
Better said; [WE] mob gang pride (i.e. Democrats-Democracy) ignorance knows no boundaries... Just as it is that most Gun-Toting criminalistic gangs knows no boundaries at all - period.
Wow. That reads like a medley of pro-Democrat bumper stickers.
You actually read that whole post?
I was curious, but to save you the effort - yeah, totally incoherent.
Biden is actually doing a pretty damn good job with the hand he was dealt.
The hand he was dealt? You mean his rapidly advancing dementia?
-jcr
Put it that and I guess the guy is doing pretty well, all things considered.
And he still kicked your guy's ass. That happened.
Seriously,
Fuck You
Sincerely,
The guy who ruined his comment with a typo.
your guy
Swing and a miss!
Like several other people here, I'm a libertarian. My candidate this time wasn't a guy, dumbass.
-jcr
At first I read “rapidly advancing diarrhea”.
You know, because he poops himself.
"If it's really a matter of too much money in the economy then you could always tax rich money ever so slightly."
The dems had a chance to do so, and instead made their SALT play to benefit their rich donors and reps in rich blue districts. No love for their plebs, and no harm against the rich they supposedly hate.
Sorry your top men betrayed you. Maybe next time you will see through their scam.
But then again, you have about 10 brain cells, so likely not
"the hand he was dealt" Yep, those lockdowns have really F'd things up.
Sure Lord Keynes..this always works
Wait, you mean the same leases that Biden tried to stop selling but were overruled in the courts via lawsuit from 14 Republican AGs forcing them to go forward with the sale? That one? You are a fucking tard. He wants to crush oil and gas. We have resources to last decades, gas could be 2 bucks a gallon and nat gas back where it was 2 yrs ago if oil production started up and he wasn't so busy shutting down pipelines. And giving the European gas business to the Russians. Yeah that's good for national security. Well played Joe.
Biden's legacy not even 1 year in:
- A war between Palestine and Israel
- Arming Muslim fundamentalist terrorists in Afghanistan with billions of dollars of weapons followed by them overtaking the government and gaining full control of the country
- Migrant crisis at southern border
- High and accelerating inflation
- Crippled supply chain from backed up ports to trucker shortages
- Labor shortage
- Shortages of just about every kind of good in stores
- Skyrocketing gas prices even as many still work from home and not having full employment
- Double digit housing inflation
- Damn near 3 trillion dollar annual deficit
- Attempting to turn 1/4 of the population into 2nd class citizens and arguably the worst federal level constitutional violation in peace time with vaccine mandates
- Mass quitting/firings of police officers, firemen, medical professionals, etc...
- Worst race relation problems since before Martin Luther King Jr.
- Crystal clear cognitive decline
- Fastest drop in presidential approval rating in 80 years
Yeah, he's doing great. Let's Go Brandon! And before you accuse me, I'm not a Trump fan and didn't vote for him in 2016 or 2020.
I think the US embassy in Yemen was seized as well
Housing inflation?
So you want real estate prices to fall, and that would be good.
Sorry you didn't get in on the ground floor? I'm sure it will crash again. We can't keep Republicans out of power every single year.
Of course housing prices dropping would be good. Housing costs have way outpaced wage growth. Any time a critical commodity increases in price considerably faster than wages it's a bad thing, it decreases standards of living and will eventually cause a destabilizing crisis in one form or another.
It won't necessarily crash because we've abandoned capitalism. The entire economy probably will end in catastrophe worse than the great depression, but it won't necessarily end in lowering of housing costs.
Part of capitalism is allowing corrections to happen without bailouts, stimulus, etc... Allowing responsible folks who sat on the side line to benefit and punishing the folks who were irresponsible and overleveraged themselves. Capitalism incentivizes responsibility and long term thinking. The central planning we have now incentivizes irresponsibility and short term thinking. Whether you think it's good or bad, I think even you'll agree that there is no way in hell the Biden administration will simply let the market correct if housing starts turning south.
Regarding your dig at republicans, didn't I specifically mention I didn't vote for Trump in the last 2 elections and that I'm not a fan? In fact, I didn't vote for Romney or McCain or Bush either.
LMAO.... "I'm sure it will crash again" -- like when Obama and a Democrat Majority of Congress existed???
Funny how you can look directly at the color Blue and see Red.
You left off:
That he left U.S. citizens behind in Afghanistan along with those weapons;
He deliberately took us from energy independence back to begging OPEC for help;
Weaponizing the FBI and "Justice" Department against dissenters, including parents at schoolboard meetings and investigative journalists who don't tow the line;
Nearly shitting himself in front of Anderson Cooper during a totally not scripted townhall that people only watched after his nearly shitting himself went viral
Fuck Joe Biden. clap clap clapclapclap
And before you accuse me, I'm not a Trump fan and didn't vote for him in 2016 or 2020.
Why would that make you a bad person?
It doesn't, but being a Trump shill is your precanned mindless response of your typical libtard when they can't argue against your position, so I wanted to preemptively put a stop to that.
Biden inherited a house of cards that was starting to burn down. His response was a combination of lighter fluid and airflow.
I would have said napalm myself
The Times is right up there with the Post and the CCP as sources you’d be a fool to believe.
Jeong's an idiot, and the NYT doesn't even make good asswipe anymore.
Remind me.. Isn't this the racist cunt who skated last year because she's a lefturd, and the Duranty News loves racists as long as they're lefturds?
-jcr
Asians were POCs that week, so it didn't count.
But she hates "white christian males" so in the Times world she is a superstar...
Why are we taking crazy avowed racists seriously?
In the bathrooms at Harvard law school the toilet paper dispensers have a sign above them that says "Free law degrees!! Take one!" apparently....
The left own-goals themselves again with lack of understanding of the economy/stockmarket. Thats +1 AOC point for her!!!
The NYT is sad. Just sad. The Establishment Rag. Can they just rename it Pravda already and be done with it? It would be the most honest thing printed on that rag in decades.
Inflation hits the poor and middle class as they don't get the newly printed money first before prices go up. It is the worst tax on them and seniors. This women is deranged..Isn't she from South Korea and blasts "white men"..who died so she didn't live under a communist regime. The real story here is the Times..run by bolsheviks they have a deep hatred for Americans of European Background who are not like them and hence look to hire folks from some "marginalized" tribe that was "discriminated" against by those horrible Irish or Italian or Greek Americans. Of course you also have to be an angry flaming asshole like this person with hate against said Americans. Its really high time someone calls these folks at the Times the bigots they are. They enjoy the butchering of certain folks (Ukrainian kuliks and Sicilians in New Orleans) don't they?
The lefturds are always the worst racists.
-jcr
Man, just went through that entire stream of Twitters she posted.
I honestly can't tell if she's trolling or just profoundly stupid. Based on her history, I'm going with the latter.
Profoundly stupid. Definitely the latter of those two.
To put it bluntly, Ms. Jeong is an idiot. Do billionaires care if the price of hamburger goes up 20%? No. They can afford it regardless of the price. It is the middle class family with three kids and a mortgage that feel the pinch. Sarah is just another coastal elite who has absolutely no clue how the real world actually works. She and Jen Psaki are two peas in a pod laughing about the tragedy of the undelivered treadmill while real people can’t pay their bills.
What do you want to do about more expensive hamburgers?
What business does a libertarian have complaining about prices rising when supply goes down and demand goes up? Isn't that what prices are supposed to do?
The real question is, since when do socialists not give a fuck how much poor people pay for stuff?
That’s quite telling.
That's literally the point of being a socialist. Do you know what you're talking about, or did you stop thinking about the things you believed sometime in your 20s?
Prices rising due to supply and demand isn’t inflation. Libertarians are fine with that.
Inflation is when the government inflates the money supply. That’s a problem for libertarians because the newly minted money is handed out to political cronies.
I wholeheartedly endorse Republicans running a political campaign on taking back everyone's stimulus checks.
The damage done by stimulus checks is irreversible. And they didn’t benefit the recipients, they benefited big banks and corporations.
But you’re right: this nation is headed towards a Weimar Republic style collapse, supported now as then by majorities, and in particular young progressive.
I am disapointed that no where in the article or comments is the word "theft". Inflation is nothing but theft. There is no easier way to steal your wealth than by cheapening your money.
By inflating the currency artificially, this steals wealth from everyone. Save up your money and be responsible? Let me just steal that by making it worth less.
The worst part is, these leftist fucks actually know this, they just pretend they don't. They want to punish you, they want to steal your wealth, and this lets them do it. Poor, Middle Class, and Rich alike are all stolen from.
But it's the leftists who want to raise wages for the poor and middle class. It's like their whole program.
Someone needs to tell them that it doesn’t really help much when everything else costs more, too.
First of all, it's not really inflation if wages aren't rising too.
Second of all, if prices are rising, might as well raise wages to keep up. The good thing about that is wages are sticky so even once the supply chain problems are sorted out, regular people will be making more money.
Inflation just means that the money supply is increasing. Whether and when wages increase is not relevant.
The leftists are still paying off their student debt from undergrad and their masters degrees. When you're in debt a couple of hundred K you love inflation -- it cuts the real amount of money you are on the hook for, while your income goes up every year, even without student loan forgiveness.
Yet it's the "leftists" who want unions to fight companies from never giving you raises. And it's the "conservatives" who would rather not punish EMPLOYERS who hire illegals and want to get rid of the minimum wage so people can work for less apparently.
I think you're pretty clearly confused on who is fighting to steal your wealth.
It's often said that libertarians are masters of econ 101, if not so much econ 102.
This thread shows this to be an incredibly unfair characterization.
It's a wonder you people can even pay for a gallon of milk without getting your thumbs stuck up your asses in the process.
When will "dumb idiot says something stupid on Twitter" stop being a newsworthy topic?
90% of news these days is "journalists" Twittering at each other.
Hi) My name is Paula, I'm 24 years old) Beginning SEX model 18+) Please rate my photos at the link - http://xurl.es/id378955
Except prices did not rise nearly as fast during covid so of course inflation would be up. Not to mention that chip shortages are to blame for a lot (especially the auto sector which makes up the bulk of the inflation numbers.)
It's something to note but as of now still appears mainly transitory. But by all means, yes, the sky is falling and we're all doomed.
So old ladies on fixed incomes are now "rich people flipping their shit"? The mind boggles.
California's Prop 13 and the subsequent tax revolts happened because of old ladies on fixed incomes. The seventies inflation hit old ladies on fixed incomes the hardest, and was in many ways the impetus for the Reagan revolution.
Biden and his ass lickers are desperate to return us to the 70s of Biden's early days, but the demographics have changed. It's not just old ladies on fixed incomes. It's any retiree (okay boomer) with a pension or 401k or just plain old retirement account. Inflation hits those with wages and salaries too, hits them hard.
meh a dozen of my favorite IPA was $0.50 cheaper this week.
Jeong hates men. That doesn't make her unusual at the NYT, where misandry runs rampant. But almost everything she writes is filled with anger and scorn, usually against people that aren't like her. The NYT Editorial Board is replete with this-Swisher, Grouse, Covert, Cottle, Gay, Bennett, Dowd...all card carrying man haters.
But sometimes they have a point or two. Rarely. However Jeong just spews rage from her entitled perch, which I guess many feminists identify with. She might have taken whatever was paid for her college (probably by the patriarhy) and just gotten 4 years of therapy. She would at least be more stable.
Yep. Government worker here. Solidly middle class. I will be getting a 2% raise in January. So effectively, I am getting a signiciant decrease in wages because inflation is well above 2%.
Was Sarah Jeong ever a "friend of Reason"? Or am I thinking of her fellow-NYTs writer Taylor Lorenz or Molly Jong-Fast. Y'all keep so much sordid company (Noah Berlatsky) it's hard to keep up.
You have to forgive Sarah. She is poor and thinks rich people are keeping dollar bills under their mattress.
I don’t mind inflation. Assets are doing just fine.
I’m just worried that delusional leftists like Sarah won’t like what they voted for: destitution and authoritarianism.
You have to forgive Sarah.
No, I really don't.
I think you need to boast about your wealth a couple more times. Someone may have missed it.
Fucking nouveau riche. They're like mosquitos, always ruining a perfectly good summer vacation.
Yes, Tony, we know: you prefer old money, they kind of people who didn’t work for their wealth. You have nothing but contempt for a first generation gay immigrant who managed to succeed in the US against all odds.
And I’m not “boasting” about my wealth; any reasonably frugal, sensible middle class American ends up being wealthy and ends up having to rely on assets and investments when they retire. It is your delusion that this represents something unusual or remarkable.
What is she, like twelve?
This is someone we're supposed to take seriously?
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FJI And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW