A Shuttered West Virginia Pharmacy Shows the DEA's Role in Escalating America's Overdose Crisis
A drug that treats opioid addiction may also be abused. That’s not a good reason to restrict access.

Overdose deaths in the United States have escalated during the pandemic, deaths fueled frequently by the continued spread of synthetic opioids like fentanyl mixed into the drug supply in cocaine and meth.
Provisional numbers show a record high of more than 93,000 drug overdose deaths in 2020, a remarkable escalation in a death rate that has slowly been climbing for the past two decades.
If we consider this a public health crisis (and certainly the politicians of both parties do), one would think the easy availability of drugs that would help treat people with opioid addictions would be a high priority among public health officials. But as Kaiser Health News, an independent affiliate of the Kaiser Family Foundation, reports this week, instead the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has been taking aim at pharmacies offering them, in part because they think drug addicts are turning to them.
It's a sadly predictable outcome of the drug war. Kaiser reports that the DEA targeted a West Virginia pharmacy operated by Martin Njoku in Fayette County. Njoku began dispensing the drug buprenorphine, often sold under the name Suboxone or Subutex, to customers starting in 2016.
As a drug, buprenorphine helps treat opioid addiction and chronic pain. But buprenorphine is also addictive and can be misused. Njoku's prescriptions drew the attention of the DEA, which accused him of facilitating opioid addiction and revoked the pharmacy's registration to dispense it and other controlled substances.
Njoku fought the revocation in federal court and in 2019 a U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin ruled that the DEA had not actually proven or shown that any patient who bought drugs at Njoku's pharmacy had abused the drug or diverted it elsewhere. The DEA had not provided a single instance that the buprenorphine was misused and instead used a lot of circumstantial evidence to justify shutting down his operation.
Even though Njoku had a federal ruling on his side, the years he spent fighting took their toll and he shut his pharmacy down in April. The fact that there are now fewer ways to get buprenorphine is not a winning strategy for reducing drug overdoses.
Reason's Jacob Sullum has reported regularly on how federal efforts to reduce overdose have instead exacerbated the problem by targeting prescription painkillers and the companies that make them as the sources of the crisis. But the evidence shows that, in fact, prescription drug use is not the primary cause of the overdose problem, and depriving people of access to drugs like Suboxone ends up sending addicts out to the street for alternatives. Those black market drugs are often laced with fentanyl, which then leads to overdose deaths.
People are much less likely to overdose on Suboxone, and as Sullum has noted, people rarely overdose while on prescribed painkillers, even if they're abusing them. Kaiser notes that new research shows that increasing the number of prescriptions of buprenorphine has not resulted in increased misuse. When these drugs are diverted to other users, it's most often to reduce and avoid the withdrawal symptoms of people who can't get prescriptions.
The DEA's targeting of Njoku's clinic had much broader implications than just depriving West Virginians of buprenorphine, Kaiser notes. Even though medical experts and the federal government both see the drug as a very important tool to fight addiction and drug overdoses, 20 percent of U.S. pharmacies don't stock the drug. A former West Virginia pharmacy compliance officer told Kaiser that these pharmacies are terrified they'll be targeted and put out of business by the DEA.
For the pharmacies that do prescribe buprenorphine, they essentially take their orders from the DEA, and wholesalers limit the amounts of pain meds individual pharmacies can have to keep the DEA happy. DEA attorneys actually argued as evidence that people were traveling long distances to get their drugs from Njoku. Goodwin noted in his ruling how the DEA's own behavior causes this to happen: "It is also well known and often commented upon that medical care providers in West Virginia, including physicians and pharmacies, are reluctant to fill prescriptions for buprenorphine-based treatment medications, meaning that even if patients live near a pharmacy, they may have to travel long distances to access their medication."
This DEA-enforced reduction of access to buprenorphine is actually helping fuel the drug overdoses as people unable to get prescriptions from doctors or to even get the prescriptions filled are turning to the black market for substitutes. The final horrible irony of the DEA's behavior here is that the DEA has also put out all sorts of fact sheets and alerts about counterfeit pills, warning that they might have fentanyl in them in potentially lethal doses. This is absolutely true. Then they say "the only safe medications are ones prescribed by a trusted medical professional and dispensed by a licensed pharmacist," ignoring the role the agency plays in making it harder to actually get these safer medications.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The composition pictured, buprenrophine plus naloxone, is a combination partial agonist-antagonist with another antagonist. This is state of the art in safety against narcotics overdosing. If dispensing of such a drug mixture is frowned on, then authorities aren't really interested in the safety of the public against narcotics overdosage.
"This is state of the art in safety against narcotics overdosing. "
LOL.
No, you retard, it's about abuse prevention.
Buprenorphine is orally active. Naloxone is not orally active.
Both Suboxone and Subutex are oral drug products.
When taken orally Suboxone (combination buprenorphine/naloxone) is no different than Subutex (plain buprenorphine.) Take enough of either and you can still overdose.
The reason for the two different products is that when you inject, or snort Subutex you get high, while if you inject or snort Suboxone you get reversal/withdrawal.
This is why practitioners are so reticent to prescribe/dispense Subutex and are always skeptical of anyone seeking treatment who claims they cannot take Suboxone.
Nothing like calling someone else a retard then falling flat on your dumb fucking face.
"The reason for the two different products is that when you inject, or snort Subutex you get high, while if you inject or snort Suboxone you get reversal/withdrawal. "
This is pure myth. It's a psychological trick because ignorant people like you don't know any better. But to be fair, most junkies are indeed ignorant people.
The reality is that even when injected, the receptor binding affinity and longer half life of buprenorphine over naloxone prevents the latter from having an effect in the dose contained in the pills. It's completely outcompeted by the buprenorphine, and metabolized faster.
These are 2 pay checks $78367 and $87367. that i received in last 2 months. I am very happy that i can make thousands in my part time and now i am enjoying my life. Everybody can do this and earn lots of dollars from home in very short time period.FEa Your Success is one step away Click Below Webpage…..
Just visit this website now.............PAYBUZZ
Roberta: Prohibitionists never care about the public safety. They want those that defy them to _die_.
Reason's Jacob Sullum has reported regularly
When you write insane jibberish you too can pump out 90 articles in a day
A tough pill to swallow.
Just the facts, in a capsule.
I’m reading it on my tablet.
chalk it up to bitter.
But the evidence shows that, in fact, prescription drug use is not the primary cause of the overdose problem, and depriving people of access to drugs like Suboxone ends up sending addicts out to the street for alternatives. Those black market drugs are often laced with fentanyl, which then leads to overdose deaths.
Yeah, but that's not the DEA's problem. They've done what they could to lower the opioid overdose death rate, if it causes it to spike elsewhere, so what? It's like when the airlines decreed, for the safety of small children, that children must have their own seat and could not sit in an adults lap and the marginal cost of an additional seat caused some parents to decide to drive rather than fly and therefore arguably caused more children to die in automobile crashes than would ever be killed in airplane crashes. The airlines didn't give a shit about kids dying in car crashes, all they cared about was that kids weren't being injured on airplanes. That's how these bureaucratic shitheads really think, as long as they've ticked off their little boxes they've done their job as far as they're concerned. If they've failed to fix the problem or even made it worse, well, they get paid to tick off boxes not to fix problems. It's fairly easy to quantify how many boxes you've ticked off, "better" or "worse" is hard to quantify and above their pay grade.
Except for the profanity, thanks for words of reason - and truth.
Actually it is the DEA's problem. In May of 2017, when Trump created HIS Opioid Commission, it mandated the CDC's suggested dosage guidelines for NEW patients as the maximum dosage for all patients. The OC encouraged the DEA to go after Dr.s who were prescribing more the 90 MEUs/day. The DEA is responsible for monitoring prescription drugs and as a result has reduced the amount of pain pills that can produced in our country. Moreover, the DEA has stated that 85% of all successful suicides and 95% of the unsuccessful attempts are from UNTREATED chronic pain patients.
By the way,
Buprenorphine does NOT control pain
Overdose deaths in the United States have escalated during the pandemic, deaths fueled frequently by the continued spread of synthetic opioids like fentanyl mixed into the drug supply in cocaine and meth.
COVID deaths.
Why don't they just wear a mask?
Surely The Science can make a vaccine to prevent addiction that we could mandate.
>>continued spread of synthetic opioids like fentanyl mixed into the drug supply in cocaine and meth
the drug testing machines only cost as much as like six 8-balls. save up, save yourself.
8 balls? Sounds like Tony just made $40.
must suck to be the butt of jokes
He swallows his pride.
lol spit-take.
Jizz hands!
Methadone has also been very effective for harm reduction and for treating opioid addicts.
But almost nobody who has publicly criticized/complained about growing fentanyl overdoses has been advocating methadone, and 75% of drug addiction treatment facilities refuse to offer methadone to patients.
Every time a new (and heavily regulated) methadone dispensary is proposed, abstinence only advocates and dozens of misinformed and scared parents testify against the proposed facility, claiming it will bring more drugs and drug dealers into their neighborhood.
Well, it would bring methadone into the neighborhood.
"and 75% of drug addiction treatment facilities refuse to offer methadone to patients."
If they are not Federally licensed as a methadone clinic they cannot legally offer methadone for addiction treatment. So I'm skeptical that 'refuse' is the proper term.
DEAnever hve been on about reducing drug consumption. teir habits and practices estblish this cler fact. From working in many countries to "conrtol" the drug trades coming from there (more like enbling certin select operationis to succeed, whilst taking adverse actioins and interdictioins agaisnt all others) They are all about control, alright. Control of the supply lines.
If they were REALLY about reducing the opioid "epidemic" they'd be policing the borders and ports to find and seize the tonnes of fentanyl etc coming in unhindered. Npe. They WANT it to continue. If all illegal drug traffic were to be stopped, they'd have no job left, It is as simple s that. Interdit enough to put on a good appearance, the paychecks will continue to roll in unabted.... just like the flow of illegal drugs.
Funny thing, with 93K deaths at least due to fentanyl, why are folks making such a stink about one ninth that number offing themselves with firearms, to the point they want to enact laws curtaiilng the rights of the rest of u,s who will NOT kill ourselves with iur handguns, and making uS jump through myraid hoops... "if we can save one life... they whinge. Well, why not let fer les addicting but effective drugs used to wean someone off the hard stuff be used by those who inow they have a probelm and want to cure it?
Makes s much sense as banning hydrochloroquine for getting people off the covid. It WORKS so they have to ban it. Same idiocy.
"less addictive but effective drugs" has been the pipe dream/empty promise of big pharma for decades if not the last century.
If they are effective at significantly reducing or eliminating withdrawal symptoms then they are addictive. Period.
There is and has never been any clinically demonstrated difference in addictiveness.
Hmmm... COVID deaths must be going under 93,000 must be time to start jacking-up that next 'EMERGENCY' in need of more Gov-Guns and Individual Oppression!
The DEA is a cancer.
Great work
Nice Blog,