There Would Be a Lot More Good News if Government Would Get Out of the Way
"The quality of life we have even during COVID is so much higher than anything humanity experienced, and it's only going to get better."

There's so much negative news these days. I was glad to see that a new podcast, American Optimist, features good things that are coming.
It's hosted by Palantir founder and venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale. He interviews entrepreneurs like Sal Churi, who funds companies like Icon, which found a way to 3D print homes in just one day.
The process is cool to watch. You can see it in my new video.
Fast home-building is such a good thing for poor people who want an affordable house! Unfortunately, Churi has to struggle to get past the government's rigid zoning and safety regulations.
"It's actually impossible to do 3D printing of homes with modern technology because government regulation is making it impossible," says Lonsdale.
"That infuriates me," I tell him. "I keep seeing these wonderful new things we can't have…because of regulations that don't matter."
"We'd probably have twice as big of an economy if we didn't have bad regulations," he replies.
If innovators finally do get past the regulators, we'll get lots of cool things.
People predicted flying cars for years. Now it may actually happen because Lonsdale's friend Paul Sciarra (Pinterest's co-founder) invested in Joby Aviation, which built a small helicopter that looks like a flying car. He hopes it will be used as an air taxi.
"It's about 100 times quieter than a helicopter," says Lonsdale. "Goes about 200 miles on a charge—safer, much quieter. The idea is to use this as a commuting vehicle. I'm pretty excited as we start to scale this out."
Another Lonsdale friend is Elon Musk, whose Boring Company hopes to create faster ways to move traffic by building tunnels.
But again, it's hard to get such new transportation past the bureaucrats' rules. Digging tunnels today actually often costs more and takes longer—even though construction equipment is much better!
"The EPA is going to insist you do these studies that take four or five years," complains Lonsdale. "It's almost like they delight in delaying you."
Musk is the rare entrepreneur who triumphs over regulations—sometimes by ignoring them.
Thankfully, in new fields, like neurotechnology, innovators sometimes escape stupid rules because regulators don't understand what they're doing.
Musk's company Neuralink invented technology that may let us control things with our minds. Our Stossel TV video on Lonsdale includes a Neuralink video clip showing a monkey playing a video game just by…thinking.
Soon this technology will help paralyzed people do new things. It may someday even help us communicate without speaking. We'll just…think…to each other.
Lonsdale's podcast includes Rick Klausner, a scientist who founded Grail, which designed a blood test that detects 50 types of cancers. But it's not available to us yet because the Federal Trade Commission blocked a merger with the company that would be selling it.
"This could be saving over 1,000 lives a month right now by detecting early cancers!" complains Lonsdale.
He interviews Maureen Hillenmeyer, founder of Hexagon Bio, which turns fungi into drugs that fight cancer. But of course, those drugs may need 10 years to get approval from the Food and Drug Administration.
"It definitely does not need to be 10 years!" says Lonsdale. "Competition of ideas is very important. When I am in charge of the federal government, I'm going to have the FDA compete against itself and have multiple competing agencies."
Will he be in charge of the government? Probably not. Would competition make bureaucrats less slow and sleepy? Probably yes.
"We're living in one of the most exciting times," concludes Lonsdale. "The quality of life we have even during COVID is so much higher than anything humanity experienced, and it's only going to get better."
I'm glad such optimists exist.
COPYRIGHT 2021 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...and it's only going to get better
The Biden regime will make sure it doesn't.
I got $97450 up to now this year working on the online and I’m a full time student. I’AM profited. It’s really dcv simple to know and I’m in order that cheerful that I got some answers regarding it. Here what I do..... Visit Here
Hi! Check out some of Best Microwave Carts with Storage 2021
Hi! Just send me some money.
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FO And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
All these great inventions and advances will become widespread as soon as proper palms are greased, politicians brought in on the ground floor of stock issues, bureaucrats appeased with larger budgets and impressive titles, lawyers getting their cut for complicating matters, and Clintons, Obamas, and Biden scions brought in to tout the benefits for large speaking fees.
The problem is that greasing of palms and buying of pols is very time consuming. Haven't we asked enough of our innovators and entrepreneurs that they figure out innovative and enterprising ways to supply their baksheesh to the government? We should just protect them from shifty competitors that don't follow the rules.
Perhaps they should buy one of Hunter's paintings...
SPECIAL REPORT: At Last...A Diet That Works. Here's How A Local 04 Mom Stumbled On To Secret Diet Used By Rachael Ray To Lose Up To 27 lbs. In 1 Month! Dr. Oz Is Calling It "#1 Miracle Fat Burner In A Bottle.... http://www.Fitapp1.com
Greasing of palms also requires money, enough that those cheap 3D printed houses for the poor will end up being even more expensive than the houses we already have
But of course, those drugs may need 10 years to get approval from the Food and Drug Administration.
So when the FDA drags its heels (gets in the way) it's killing people, and when it rushes a vaccine (gets out of the way) it's forcing experimental medicine on people.
Poor FDA. No matter what they do, it's wrong.
Maybe they should be abolished.
Poor FDA. No matter what they do, it’s wrong.
I would love to say that sarc is finally starting to understand, but this is just one of those times where the broken clock shows the right time.
Saying it sarcastically proves him to be an insufferable twat trying to preemptively pwn his critics.
Idiot. Can you not understand that both ways are wrong? The FDA's idea of "getting out of the way" does not actually get out of the way; it merely creates a so-called fast track. It would be faster yet if it actually did get out of the way.
David Bernstein on Volokh Conspiracy had several articles on some of the delays built in to their "fast track", such as testing must include separate testing for all the legal race categories, which are entirely politically defined and have no basis in biology, such as lumping all Asians together.
Idiot.
No reason for me to read or respond to anything after that. Let me know when you decide to stop impressing the to quoque brigade and want to have a conversation like an adult.
I won't hold my breath.
You? Have a conversation "like an adult"? Go ahead, prove you deserve adult responses by writing adult comments.
I did. Or were you not paying attention?
No, "both sides" is not adult. It's the kind of crap foisted on kindergartners to get them to shut up and drink their chocolate milk.
So trying to understand both sides is childish because adults focus on one side and demonize the other?
Trying to equalize both sides is extremely childish.
If you actually tried to compare them, that would be astonishingly adult.
Ohhh I get it. I think. You interpret pointing out that both sides suck as saying both sides are equal.
Well dude, they both suck. They suck in varying degrees at varying things, but they both suck.
When I see someone saying one is better than the other, I hear one sucks less. But sucking less is stull sucking. The lesser of two evils is still evil.
So yeah, both sides are equal in that they both suck and they're both evil. How much is subjective.
No, you do that. All you do is make snide remarks about "both sides". You never actually compare them. That's a child with its thumbs in its ears going "nyaah nyaaah i cant hear you".
You mean I don't contrast them?
All you do is make snide remarks about “both sides”. You never actually compare them.
I point out how similar people are to those they hate so much they'd murder them if they thought they could get away with it.
they hate so much they’d murder them if they thought they could get away with it.
I love it when the little bitches like sarc lose it and inadvertently project how much they despise other people. It's like pulling down the curtain behind which he is flicking the gaslights on and off.
"...and want to have a conversation like an adult."
Translated from asshole Joe/sarc-speak:
"...when you stop calling me on my bullshit!"
It's mendacious, bad faith stupidity. First you say you're hungry, but when I try to force feed you a poisoned pill, you won't eat. Why can't you just stick to your principles and let me win?
What is the magic amount of testing before something approved by the FDA ceases to be experimental?
Oh, that kind of insult is adult?
If people are going to say that the COVID vaccines are experimental medicine, then they should be able to define experimental and when something ceases to be experimental.
If that's an insult then I guess thinking is insulting.
"magic" is a childish insult. You think it's merely too clever to be found out. That's childish.
"Magic" is a word intentionally used to point out that the answer is subjective.
Please, continue demonstrating mendacious, bad faith stupidity.
"Hur, dur, What is the magic amount of poison pills we should force people to take before we can be sure they're poisonous?" - sarcasmic
Vaccines are poison now?
Passively-aggressively pretending to not understand sarcasm is amazingly childish for someone who claims that handle.
You've done a good job of making this about me instead of whatever the topic may have been. I'm resisting muting you, because once you go there you don't come back. The trolls are Lucy, and this Charlie Brown will never kick that ball again.
Hur, dur, exactly how much poison would have to be in the vaccines before you would think it's wrong for them to be mandatory? Hurpity durpity doo!
The thing is the COVID-19 vaccines have now been tested to a degree orders of magnitude beyond what any clinical trial could have done. And the overwhelming evidence is that they are quite safe.
Long term? Like DES?
Except the tests aren't, or weren't, just for safety, but for efficacy as well.
The fascist inconsistency that people like you and sarcasmic keep hurp-a-durping away is that the FDA has forbade, *and continues to forbid*, life-altering medications to terminal patients because of the necessary criteria that it waived away to fail to combat a disease that's not even debilitating for 99+% of people who catch it.
But, hurpity doo! What's the problem with the FDA mandating some drugs and forbidding others?
Getting the vaccine out as quick as it did was a political miracle. And all people can do is whine that it was too soon.
Jokes about 9/11: Too soon!
Live saving vaccines: Too soon!
Sigh.
Fuck Joe Biden, fuck Donald Trump, fuck Greg Abbott, fuck the FDA. The only reason I'm not an outright anarchist because I know if we ever got an true free society you fuckers would revolt.
Trump himself, who bragged about getting the vaccine out in a hurry, is now getting boo'ed at his own MAGA rallies if he says anything pro-vaccine. It's bonkers.
So it’s bad that Trump supporters can think for themselves?
No, that they don't.
One can reasonably believe the ~16 months to approve the Covid vaccine was too short, while also believing 10 years for most other drugs is too long
Also, its now clear the FDA approval of the Covid vaccine was not about getting out of the way, and really only about giving the Biden administration justification for issuing the vaccine mandate
Eh, not really. The covid vaccine should have had challenge trials after 1 month, and been fully approved in less than 6.
Honestly, there shouldn't even be an approval process. If a doctor is convinced its effective, the doctor should be able to prescribe it.
Maybe my cynicism has gotten the best of me. I read John talking about flashy technology and medical advances but all I see is, "pay no attention to the man behind the Iron Curtain."
Access to the glorious future will require a vaccine card and Party membership.
And loyalty. Don’t forget loyalty.
Goods and services will be distributed based on a social credit score.
It’s the fair way to do things.
I can't read what you're replying to, but I like the credit score idea. Puts me at the front of the line.
Hopefully that is the line for the train to the 'workcamp' in Barrow.
"I can’t read what you’re replying to,..."
In which case, fuck off.
Oh, I missed the word "social". Damn. Now I'm back at the end of the line.
Obeisance out of fear is not loyalty, it is cowardice. And I have no doubts that is what they want. The true loyalists will get the guillotine, just like the Jacobins they are emulating.
Joss Whedon is a perfect example. He decided he was with Her and quit the MCU to produce anti-Trump PSAs. When he returned, he completely botched his debut at DC. They moment he was vulnerable, they cancelled him. Poetic justice, because he seemed to really understand the process:
The Operative: I believe in something greater than myself. A better world. A world without sin.
Malcolm Reynolds: So me and mine gotta lay down and die... so you can live in your better world?
The Operative: I'm not going to live there. There's no place for me there... any more than there is for you. Malcolm... I'm a monster. What I do is evil. I have no illusions about it, but it must be done.
Lines from a movie in which a tyrannical government forces a medical intervention upon the population of an entire planet with disastrous results. Irony layered upon irony. Imagine if She had been in office when COVID emerged [shudder].
itswits funnyfunny because joss emulates and strives to be the villains in his movies and shows
The analogy is Gorram invalid.
The Pax was to stop aggresiveness in humans, though it did more than that.
(No other giveaways besides that. Get yer own Serenity video or stream, Kitty!)
The COVID-19 vaccine is to keep people breathing so they can "get-up-and-go" peacefully and so far has done nothing else.
Put it this way: I wouldn't want The Operative to have the COVID-19 vaccine.
The analogy is perfect. The COVID vaccine is already proving to be unsuitable for its intended purpose. And there does seem to be a small percentage of the population who react to it with uncontrollable rage.
Put it this way: I wouldn’t want The Operative to have the COVID-19 vaccine.
Guys exactly like the operative, except less introspective, are making public policy regarding the vaccine.
I read John talking about flashy technology and medical advances but all I see is, “pay no attention to the man behind the Iron Curtain.”
Yeah, the use of flash paper itself bugs me. Icon especially is just retarded. Concrete itself is already a 3D printed/printable material. Their "advantage" is that they only pour it 3-6" at a time in a fairly limited arrangement/footprint, automatically. It's great if you're looking to create abunch of low-income Section 8/FEMA-style housing. Otherwise, it's inferior to decades-old CMU and pumped concrete "technology".
I have a pet theory that the saviors of liberty and progress will be encryption and 3D priinters.
Encryption will eventually allow mesh networks which governments can't control except by literally sending jack booted thugs door-to-door to confiscate mesh routers, and the economy will depend more on them than the USSR did on phones and fax, which undermined their dictatorship.
3D printers will expand so be similarly vital to the economy, and government will no more be able to control them or their feedstock that people will be able to create whatever they want without the government having any control -- guns and medicines come to mind.
I expect that someday, everyone will have a small medical analyzer / maker in their bathrooms, which will use noninvasive tech to analyze your blood, or analyze every toilet flush, and create on-the-spot medicines to counter whatever ails you.
And mesh networks will enable Silk Road 9.9 to distribute plans for your own routers and 3D printers which will be free of government-mandated snitches and filters.
I think it's possible to happen by 2050, but certainly by 2100.
The economy and society will gradually shift to these dark nets, out of control and even sight of the government. What remains for the government to control will be a smaller and smaller fraction of daily life, and government will in effect gradually shrink. It will probably never disappear entirely, but it will shrink to irrelevancy.
I expect that someday, everyone will have a small medical analyzer / maker in their bathrooms, which will use noninvasive tech to analyze your blood, or analyze every toilet flush, and create on-the-spot medicines to counter whatever ails you.
Like Theranos?
I see, that's an adult answer. Good to know.
Do you know what Theranos is?
He thinks it's a genocidal maniac from the Marvel universe.
That's funny, because I associate it with a totally fuckable blonde.
Everything about Elizabeth Holmes is fake. I'd be careful.
Another adult answer?
If you can't recognize the difference between an actual past-tense fraud and a hazy prediction for the future, you are a child.
Theranos promised what you're saying everyone will have in a few decades. Right? So when I say "Like Theranos" I'm saying "Like that machine they said could do wonders with a drop of blood?"
It's called having a conversation.
But you only want to attack and then lecture me about maturity.
I'm dumb, remember? You have to either explain things to me, or ignore me as you promised. But you are too childish to keep your promise to ignore me, and too dumb to explain things, as your feeble and incorrect Theranos "explanation" shows.
You are in no way interested in an honest conversation. You're just looking for gotchas. I'm not playing.
*yawn*
You’re just looking for gotchas. I’m not playing.
He usually claims that all he does is just playing.
Gaslighting sack of shit.
I expect that someday, everyone will have a small medical analyzer / maker in their bathrooms, which will use noninvasive tech to analyze your blood, or analyze every toilet flush, and create on-the-spot medicines to counter whatever ails you.
Having a prostate, cervix, appendix, tonsils, adenoids, and even sinuses ails you. Long before we have the ability to fabricate everything we need to support these systems, we'll be able replace them with better ones or just remove them. Why have the analyzer/maker in the bathroom? Why not have it as part of the augmentation?
Details, details.
I would love to share your optimism. However, as a child of the 90s who grew when the Internet was libertarian and "couldn't be regulated", and the belief was that as our lives moved further online, we would get more free, seeing that vision get corrupted over the last decade is depressing.
The problem isn't the ability to communicate. Even before encryption, you could find pretty much anything on the Internet, if you wanted. However, if you want scale, you need to pay people to take care of the infrastructure. And in order to pay people, you need revenue. At that point, the government gets its paws into what you are doing.
Bitcoin was supposed to fix that, but now look at the efforts to regulate exchanges and wallets. How long will it be before exchanges are forced to blacklist any coins that have "touched" a prohibited address? Get on Uncle Sam's bad side, and suddenly nobody wants your money anymore.
3D printers are free right now, in the tinkerer stage of development. However, once they become a consumer item, what are the odds that the big boys all decide to make it such that the printers will only print parts sold in their proprietary store a la iOS apps?
I expect that someday, everyone will have a small medical analyzer / maker in their bathrooms, which will use noninvasive tech to analyze your blood, or analyze every toilet flush, and create on-the-spot medicines to counter whatever ails you.
I want Carlos Wu's autodoc.
When I am in charge of the federal government, I'm going to have the FDA compete against itself and have multiple competing agencies."
I support the FDA Deathmatch doctrine.
Slowing and halting progress has been one of government's core functions since time immemorial. Stopping bandits and halting progress. Humans are naturally conservative species. They do not like change. They want things to stay the same. And if there is a government they can use as a hammer, then they will use that hammer to prevent things from changing.
The Discovery of Freedom shows that the biggest surges of progress occurred during periods of weak or ineffective government. Doesn't matter if government is Team Red or Team Blue (monarchists or radicals) both sides (BOTH SIDES!) hate progress and want to return to some mythical golden age where everything was just right and as God and Nature intended.
Imagine how huge your retirement savings would be if government didn't siphon away FICA taxes every paycheck. Same thing, but with material progress. The reason the internet boomed the way it did was because government didn't turn its baleful eye to it until it was too late. Now it's playing catchup trying to regulate it. Imagine the progress in computers and the internet applied to EVERY industry, every walk of life. Massive progress. And that scares the shit out of most people. So sad.
Only a complete fucking moron thinks you can just blanket get rid of regulations and things improve without fail. Pro tip- the regulations were probably put in place after someone fucked up.
Hell- look at self driving cars. Don't we have regulations there? And smartly so considering people have already been killed by them. I guess if you measure progress as "move fast, break everything" then sure, it'd get all better.
This kind of pants on head stupidity only belongs in the saddest of rags. I guess that's why it's here.
This kind of pants on head stupidity only belongs in the saddest of rags. I guess that’s why it’s here.
No. That's why you're here.
regulations are put in place by tyrants who can't get what they want the right way.
Only a complete fucking moron think you can just pass blanket regulations and things improve without fail. Pro tip- the regulations just mean when the person on charge of regulating fucks up, everyone gets screwed
As for self-driving cars, the fatal accident rate per mile driven is lower than human driven cars, and almost all accidents are attributable to driver error (usually being distracted, since the cars aren't fully autonomous, but hey at least distracted driving isn't a problem in regular cars, right? Right?)
You are a retard, regulatory capture was the original purpose of regulation
When I look at the Left's response to the mess the economy has become e.g. "lower your expectations" I just have to laugh.
For time out of mind they've been telling us that the market is a big failure and only they with their giant brains can run an economy that works. Well, here ya go...the perfect opportunity to prove once and for all their vast superiority and what do they do? Tell us "try to lower expectations". That's their fucking plan, the one their giant brains have come up with? Ha.
Pro tip- the regulations were probably put in place after someone fucked up.
That is sooooo not true. Regulators create rules because if they didn't then they'd be out of a job. More often regulations aren't even written by the bureaucrat. They're written by companies who want rules in place to prevent competition. Bootleggers and Baptists.
I'll just make something up here, but it wouldn't surprise me if it has happened. Say a brick-and-mortar restaurant is losing customers to a food truck, and they don't like it. They might petition the city to not allow food trucks at all, to limit where they park, to force trucks to purchase expensive equipment, or some something. It will be sold as a service to the community, but the entire purpose is to make life miserable for the competition.
That's what regulations are all about.
I’ll just make something up here, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it has happened.
It has. Chicago. Reason has covered it over the years.
sarc is a wholly unimaginative person of middling intelligence, i.e., the perfect lefty apologist. Food trucks are banned or limited and hounded by health inspectors in most cities and have been for years. Because of lobbying by restaurants.
He is trying to appear smart by 'predicting' something that is perfectly commonplace, but not well known. If people don't move around, they might not know how prevalent it is. It's just another form of gaslighting, so it doesn't surprise me at all that he engages in it. Probably stuffs a sock in his shorts as well.
Fine. I didn't make it up.
"Regulatory capture is misinformation!"
-raspberrydinners, probably
Attitude is a little thing That makes a big difference. To be inspired and always have the best royal attitude status in english to win in life.
https://www.ozalm.com/search/label/Status
Wtf is best royal attitude status in english?
The 3d printed house is a scam. It's not that cheap and not that fast. Even Stossel can be gullible.
24 hours to seal in a house isn't fast? Walls (exterior and interior) and roof? What's the reduction in labor hours? How does it compare costwise to comparable site construction?
24 hours to seal in a house isn’t fast?
First, it's 24 hours for *just* the walls in a 1-story 500 sq. ft. dwelling.
All materials on-hand, pre-cast and the same number of experienced people could probably do the same in 8 hours. Stick-built modular, almost certainly less.
Second, in the context of the discussion, it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. It doesn't take a month to build a 50,000 sq. ft. warehouse out of pre-cast because it takes that long for the concrete to dry. It takes that long to get sewage permits, so you can get building permits, so you can start to dig. The 3D printer is actually counterproductive in this regard as pre-cast can start pouring the walls before you get the sewage permit whereas the 3D printer has to sit idle.
There was a time, in the 18th century, when a 3D printer would've been called a 'hoist', 'bridge crane', or 'gantry'. But, because Science! and Technology! We don't call it that.
Old school gantry fabrication that clearly can't compete with 3D printing because they don't use Technology!
Just stupid.
Just look at these neanderthals trying to build a 2200 sq. ft. home in 24 hrs., to spec, without Technology!
It's more like 54 hours. The guy is giving the best case WHEN they get it working optimally.
So you spend another day and a half in Motel Six waiting for your 3-D home! Whadda ya want for nothin'? R-R-R-R-R-R-Rubber Biscuit???
https://youtu.be/jYyBZE0kBtE
You know how to make the bureaucracy be less slow and sleepy? The guillotine. Start handing out Republican Haircuts to bureaucrats who clog up the works, and you’ll be surprised how fast they move.
No question there are a lot of stupid regulations out there that hamper growth. Get all of those pesky regulations out of the way and in short order we'll have clones and cyborgs doing your job faster better and cheaper than you can.
“Great share!”
“Great share!”
“Nice info!”
“Nice info!”