Missouri's Governor Rejects Pope's Request To Spare Death Row Inmate
Ernest Johnson is scheduled to be executed today.

Ernest Johnson, 61, is scheduled to be put to death today for killing three convenience store workers with a hammer in Columbia, Missouri, in 1994. The state's governor has turned down appeals for mercy from Pope Francis.
Missouri's top court has rejected arguments that Johnson is ineligible for the death penalty because of his intellectual disability. Johnson's lawyer, Jeremy Weis, noted that Johnson has been tested with the IQ of a child, was born with fetal alcohol syndrome, and lost a chunk of his brain due to a tumor in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that it's a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment to execute somebody with an intellectual disability. States have some leeway when it comes to determining what an "intellectual disability" means, with some restrictions. A 2014 Supreme Court ruling established some basic tests rather than a simple IQ threshold requirement.
After the Supreme Court's 2002 ruling, Johnson's death sentence was initially tossed out by Missouri's Supreme Court over questions of Johnson's mental competency, but then the sentence was reinstated in 2006 as a result of a new sentencing hearing.
Vatican News reported Friday that a personal representative of Pope Francis appealed to Missouri Gov. Michael Parson (R) by letter on behalf of the pope to request clemency. The letter did not attempt to excuse Johnson's crimes, but rather pointed to Johnson's "doubtful intellectual capacity."
"His holiness wishes to place before you the simple fact of Mr. Johnson's humanity and the sacredness of all human life," wrote Archbishop Christophe Pierre, who added that rejecting the death penalty would be a "courageous recognition of the inalienable dignity of all human life."
But Parson would not be moved, and his office Monday announced plans to proceed with the execution.
Should Johnson be executed today, that will be the seventh execution in the United States in 2021. The first three were of federal prisoners, their executions all taking place in the final days of President Donald Trump's administration. The other three executions occurred in Texas.
Johnson's is the only execution scheduled in Missouri this year. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, only three other states—Texas, Oklahoma, and Alabama—have any executions scheduled for the remainder of the year.
Assuming that all of these planned executions take place in 2021, including Johnson's, America will execute 15 people this year. That would be two fewer executions than in 2020, a year in which more than half of the executions nationwide were carried out by the federal prison system. The use of the death penalty in the United States is on the decline and has been for years. Virginia, once a leading state when it came to executing prisoners, ended its use of the death penalty in February, the 23rd state to do so.
But this trend, and Missouri's harsh justice system in general, is leaving Johnson behind. While it's not surprising to see Parson decline mercy for somebody who is actually guilty, it's nevertheless an irreversible application of government authority that should be discouraged when it's not necessary. We have not become more just as a country through the use of the death penalty.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There is nothing that restricts how the death penalty can be used - unless challenged in court.
In fact, the state can make laws that when violated require the death penalty.
It is essentially a license for the state to kill people.
That line of thinking applies to any punishment the state can impose for crimes against the people. What is your point?
These are 2 pay checks $78367 and $87367. that i received in last 2 months. I am very happy that i can make thousands in my part time and now i am enjoying my life.Fgn Everybody can do this and earn lots of dollars from home in very short time period. Your Success is one step away Click Below Webpage…..
Just visit this website now............ VISIT HERE
The state has a license to kill people. Every state does. The question becomes, under what conditions is it tolerable?
The death penalty is an intolerable use of that power, according to some. To others, tolerable in rare circumstances. To yet others, tolerable for offenses lesser than murder.
But to say the death penalty is unique in that it gives states a "license to kill people" is a total misreading of reality, no matter where you stand on the death penalty.
Seriously paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily. simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now……………… http://gg.gg/w3b6a
So the argument that Parsons should stay the sentence is because you personally do not like the death penalty, so the governor should go against the legislature 's decision and the court's ruling that Johnson is competent enough? You are making a good argument that Johnson should never be free as you say he is incapable of being responsible for his actions.
Supreme Court Of The United States of America has ruled on this. Executing anyone with Intellectual disabilities is unconstitutional it violates “Cruel and Unusual Punishment.”
It would seem that the Courts have ruled that Johnson does not qualify.
How intellectually disabled do you have to be, though? I guess that's the question. Disabled enough that you ask to save the pie from your last meal to eat later? Or just disabled enough to find handing out burgers at the local drive through intellectually challenging?
IOW, are we talking .049% of the population, or 49%?
"Ernest Johnson, 61, is scheduled to be put to death today for killing three convenience store workers with a hammer in Columbia, Missouri, in 1994."
Sounds like a great candidate for the Koch / Reason #EmptyThePrisons program.
Vatican News reported Friday that a personal representative of Pope Francis appealed to Missouri Gov. Michael Parson (R) by letter on behalf of the pope to request clemency.
The governor responded to the Pope by saying "fuck you, I'm Baptist".
The pope responded, "See you at the stake, heretic".
What about the Pope of Greenwich Village?
I would’ve called Francis out and say “You think he’s worth saving, but you couldn’t be bothered to board a plane and visit him?”
Not clear why papal interference is relevant. Should the Pope be able to influence leadership? Sounds like church-state stuff Reason finds so icky. Shackford also seems less than enthused by the Pope's condemnation of abortion.
Would it be any more relevant than Taliban interference?
I'd be very confused if the Taliban tried to stop an execution.
lol
+1 those fuckers still crucify wtf.
They might try to claim trademark infringement.
Cultural appropriation?
Shackford also seems less than enthused by the Pope’s condemnation of abortion.
Not to mention the consistent 'Hate the sin, not the sinner.' message pushed by both conservative and progressive popes.
*looks around nervously*
So... my tendencies don't make me a bad person...
I'm 100% good with that interpretation.
So "The Pope" felt so strongly about this that he had an underling send a letter to the Governor - wow, that's almost meaningful.
I wonder if "The Pope" has ever had one of his underlings send a similar request to any US politician regarding abortions? Based on the strongly-held 'all lives are sacred' position his holiness holds, I'm certain he's lobbying to reduce/prevent the million plus abortions performed each year in America, or does his compassion only extend to the murderers that wield a hammer to murder his fellow humans?
Hey. Strongly worded letters work great for the UN.
Well, red state politicians seem perfectly willing to Lt Ollie religion when it comes to abortion, and opposing the death penalty is a pro-life position too
Listen to religion
I dont remember any clumps of cells killing 3 people with a hammer.
But they could grow up to be insurrectionists. How could the doctor with the coat hanger know that they wouldn’t storm the Capitol?
The Pope is just doing his thing. Not surprised that the CC would intervene in this case. Others are against the death penalty also, but because it's the CC, not relevant in your eyes? Why can't someone from a religious institution have an opinion?
In 1999, Missouri Gov. Mel Carnahan, in honor of a visit by Pope John Paul II, commuted the death sentence of a particularly loathsome triple murderer Darrell J. Mease. Some minor Internet sleuthing discloses that Mease is still in prison.
(2) I would have preferred Gov. Carnahan to have kicked Mease's case down the road for two years, instead commuting the next, hopefully less abhorrent, murderer's sentence.
I wonder how the Pope is supposed to be a more credible authority on the death penalty than the Taliban.
Pretty much anyone is more credible than Salafists when it comes to the topic of killing people.
Had Johnson used a drone or worn a BLM hoodie it would have been ok.
"The pope? How many divisions does he have?"
Dunno, but it seems that in MO, he doesn't have enough voters.
quit Stalin and answer the question.
Swiss Papal Guard, plus all the mobsters the Vatican launders money for.
No, the State should not be able to execute people. Yes, this turd needs to be incarcerated until he dies.
But...
* His 2008 brain tumor has nothing to do with a crime committed in 1994.
* The Pope is a Marxist dictator who despises capitalism for lifting billions of people out of poverty and adding billions of years of life to the world, as compared to his beloved Marxists who murdered 100 million people last century and continue to murder more today. His confusion over which lives are worth saving means his view on saving lives is worthless.
* Basing your outrage on this scumbag, when there are undoubtedly other death row inmates more worthy of living, harms your cause. If you cannot see this, you are an idiot.
His 2008 brain tumor has nothing to do with a crime committed in 1994.
This is an excellent point and often the product of clever defense attorneys. "Look at my poor client, he can barely even stand!"
The Pope is a Marxist dictator who despises capitalism for lifting billions of people out of poverty and adding billions of years of life to the world,
I see you too have been reading the encyclicals.
To be fair the Pope is a Peronist dictator who despises capitalism because Evita told him to.
Just because the tumor was removed in 2008 doesn't mean that he didn't have it in 1994. As you know, benign brain tumors can go undetected for years.
Why is Johnson's life worth more now that he is substantially more disabled than he was in 2007? Society is against punishing the mentally defective because they are not held to be as responsible for their actions, but he was apparently held capable enough at trial.
...but he was apparently held capable enough at trial.
Which means diddly squat. This is America after all. The land of corrupt prosecutors and incompetent public pretenders.
From looking at the case it doesn't appear to be very circumstantial. It's very unambiguous that he committed the crimes. The man is a murderer. He knew what he was doing when he did it.
I'm questioning his competence, not his guilt.
The new form of justice: The right to be presumed retarded until proven of sound mind.
The Alex Jones defense?
As we do with you.
Scoring points with the girls. Rah rah fuck you.
No. Fuck Joe Biden.
Fuck Joe Biden
Fuck Joe Biden.
They should have at least delayed the execution until they could confirm he was fit to be executed.
Dunno the facts of the case and am no supporter of the death penalty, but a guy supported by a superstition who wears a funny hat has no standing, and no reason to be given ink or bandwidth.
He has as much standing as the Taliban.
Or the guy on the corner wearing a sandwich board claiming the world's gonna end tomorrow.
The difference being that the last mentioned has caused far less harm than the other two.
That guy has predicted 20 of the last 0 armageddons!
You're forgetting the power of a big hat.
The Pope should not have even the slightest bit of influence on any aspect of the US government
But if you feel he does, then Reason is now against abortion, because the Pope opposes it?
Yes, but the narrative...
Just think of the Pope as an Italian celebrity and his influence should be the same as any other Italian celebrity.
It's not really comparable.
We're talking about an older, larger clump of cells who killed people. Not a smaller, younger clump of cells.
The Pope is Catholic. I grew up Catholic. Catholics have always opposed the Death Penalty and Abortion. Only God has the right to take a life away. No I don’t go to church. And am only Catholic by baptism.
"Catholics have always opposed the Death Penalty." Always??? Were you born yesterday? Have you heard of the Inquisition? Of the medieval bishop who instructed the Albigensian Crusade "Kill them all, God will know his own"? But you don't have to go back that far. I'm pretty sure the Catholic Church's opposition to the death penalty is younger than I am, and I was born in the 1950's.
Because I like to hear the clacking of my own keys:
Death penalty bad for lots of reasons.
This guy seems incapable of rehabilitation because brain damage.
So... if the legislature thinks executing people makes the world safer, this seems like a candidate.
I truly feel sorry for him, and his victims, and their families. But none of it is relevant to the question at hand. This guy isn't the reason I oppose the death penalty.
I oppose the death penalty because cops railroad, prosecutors lie and judges are almost unanimously lazy fucks whose incompetence is only matched by their arrogance.
So this clearly guilty multiple-murderer who used a hammer to dispatch his victims gets a pass because other people were abused by the legal system?
That makes no sense.
The mere existence of the death penalty makes it all too easy for corrupt, incompetent, and/or lazy cops and prosecutors to railroad some schmuck onto death row, because it's easier than doing the job and finding the real criminal. Illinois in one year had more exonerations than executions, and since few executed prisoners ever get investigated, some of the executed were bound to be innocent.
That's the practical reason to oppose the death penalty.
This would've been my reply if Á ÀSS ÄẞÇ hadn't beat me to it.
There is no doubt of guilt in this case.
Then you’ll agree that there is no practical reason to oppose the death penalty in this case.
Nobody is saying he should be out of prison.
Todd Cameron Willingham was convicted of arson which killed his three daughters. A second investigation determined that the fire WAS NOT ARSON. But TEXAS EXECUTED him anyway. THAT’S WHY the death penalty is wrong. The risk of one innocent man be executed is bad. It’s better to let them sit in prison for life.
No, the second investigation didn't determine that at all, Noonan. You can go through the roughly 900 page report from the Texas Forensic Science Commission here: http://www.fsc.state.tx.us/documents/FINAL.pdf Not that you'll read it.
They do basically say the initial fire investigation was essentially garbage, albeit within the expected level of expertise for a Navarro County crime investigation in 1991, but they do not say that it was conclusively not arson. (Not surprisingly, considering this came after Willingham had already been executed.) They also don't conclusively say it was arson, despite the presence of burned accelerant within the house. (Willingham claimed it was from a lantern falling during the fire.) Conclusively saying it was definitely arson would be tough, after Craig Beyler's findings.
The incompetence of the Navarro County investigators doesn't necessarily mean Willingham was innocent, or that the fire wasn't set by him. Willingham's own behavior during the fire, as attested by numerous witnesses, didn't lead the jury to have reasonable doubt that he didn't start the fire. And his prior criminal history stomped into the ground whatever hesitancy the punishment phase jury might've had to execute him, about as badly as Willingham used to beat his ex-wife.
In short, a typical example of who the Innocence Project likes to use to show the injustice of capital punishment.
The pope also opposes abortion. How persuasive is that?
If he opposes both abortion and the death penalty then at least he's consistent.
Babies are helpless and innocent, put into the womb by the voluntary behaviour of the woman.
Your analogy is pathetic.
This.
Agree. These are separate discussions.
But we're not talking about "babies". And babies aren't put into wombs. It's semen in a vagina at that stage dude. That's no baby! Hilarious. You forced birthers are crazy!
You think it’s crazy that a baby exists in the womb.
I don’t think you know what crazy means.
No he’s correct. The Pope is consistent.
Has he sent a letter to any us politicians that support abortion, like Obama, Biden, Pelosi, etc? Why don't a million murdered (aborted) children merit a papal request, but a claw hammer-wielding serial murderer does?
Ask him.
There are pro-abortion Catholics that tithe.
Was about to say, was the Pope's moral authority so important when he was against gay marriage?
insert requisite statement against l'Etat having the power to execute.
The pope should know, an eye for an eye.
Wrong testament.
I'd rather the family exact the execution than Missouri.
Wrong again.
The Catholic Church doesn’t contradict the Old Testament.
Are you actually suggesting that they oppose all punishment for criminals, leaving it up to God?
The Pope knows better.
You're wrong, but not worth the effort of correcting because you won't learn a damn thing.
Hahaha.
That’s your pathetic excuse when you can’t refute what you deny.
By 2018, the Catholic Church had so consistently and frequently taught the legitimacy of the death penalty (when properly administered) that the matter ought to be considered settled. That is, for those who believe in such things, the Church has infallibly taught that the death penalty is legitimate in proper circumstances. Those who taught that the death penalty is intrinsically contrary to the Gospel were condemned as heretics.
Then in 2018, Pope Chuckles changed the Catechism to read, "the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that 'the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person.'"
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/08/02/pope-francis-revises-catechism-teaches-death-penalty-inadmissible
https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P7Z.HTM (2267)
Revising the Catechism is not an infallible action. But if Pope Chuckles were to proclaim infallibly that the death penalty is always wrong, he would falsify the doctrine of infallibility itself, and thus falsify all Catholic teaching.
For Catholics who don't think the Church is some Marxist-Leninist party which can at any time do a doctrinal 180 and expect the sheep to blindly follow, this is a serious problem.
Being a retard doesn’t excuse killing people. I’m generally against the death penalty mostly because I’m tired of hearing about it, but it sounds like the state would be putting this guy out of his misery.
Also, the pope can fuck right off.
The issue here is that his mental ability was marginal at the trial, then, after he was convicted, he had a brain tumor, after the tumor was removed his mental capacity was further diminished.
I think the fair standard is 'at the time of the offense' not at any random point in the future (after the commission of the crime).
The pope should be more concerned with pedophile priests he covered for while the cardinal of Buenos Aires.
Thou shall not commit buggery with altar boys is not a commandment and thus apparently acceptable if enough Hail Marys are uttered.
We have not become more just as a country through the use of the death penalty.
Justice is only one prong of the fork. If you've got a rabid dog, you kill it. You kill it despite the fact that it's not its fault it has rabies and it's not responsible for what its doing. In fact, the fact that the dog has no idea why it's dangerous is an even better reason to kill it. You can't reason with a rabid dog or make it understand why it's wrong to go around biting people, you just have to kill it in order to protect society. If this guy is so brain-damaged that he doesn't know right from wrong or appreciate what he's done, well, he's a rabid dog.
That being said - I'm 100% against the death penalty if it means giving the government the power to kill people. I'd rather take my chances with a few insane people wandering around killing people than to have the government decide who needs killing.
Any thoughts on the Aid worker and seven children the US Gov't monitored for 8 hours before blowing them all up in their car in Afghanistan?
the real election results were in the trunk.
Yes. It was a war crime and President Biden should be prosecuted for it.
Won't God know his own?
Inclusion
The comments on that clip are fun.
Today I learned that netball in Australian sounds a lot like nipple
In 2003, corporate "racial equity" programs were estimated to be about $8 billion a year. Today, they're estimated to be ~$200 billion.
"Diversity is good for business... she's not wrong"
Never give the government the power of execution.
Biden failed to execute an organized withdrawal from Afghanistan. Or one could say he executed it.
Plus he executed several children and 13 U.S soldiers.
Better 27 years late than never.
White men are more likely to actually be executed
White men can’t jump bail
If it wasn't for the death penalty there wouldn't be a pope, or a religion for that matter.
"Cursed is he who hangs from the tree"
Basically overturning the death penalty once and for all.
Bill Clinton executed a man who was effectively retarded just to show how tough he was on crime. It was awful, evil, and disgusting – and it got him elected.
I hope Parson isn't pulling the same trick, and is using this for showboating for the tough-on-crime crowd. I don't know the man, so I can't say he is, but I worry about these things.
No, he had him executed because he murdered people in cold blood.
There was no doubt about his guilt.
Calculate love percentage
All you have to do is look up the rates of homicides in every major U.S. city, especially in Chicago, Portland and every city run by liberals.
It's surprising how many killings were perpetrated by repeat offenders, some of them already out on bail or with warrants for failing to show in court.
There are prosecutors who refuse to do their job, so criminals are allowed back on the streets to terrorize the population. People are unwilling to testify even when a drive by shooting at a birthday party results in the death of a young boy.
Just this week, in Chicago, at Lakeview High School, more than 50 shots were fired leaving a 16 year old boy dead. This was the result of a rolling gun battle between two vehicles. The police have no suspects as of today.
Would the death penalty have any effect on this is hard to say.
The one problem that anyone with any sense of right and wrong would say the situation is completely out of control and that Mayors such as Lightfoot and Wheeler are totally clueless.
How bad does it have to get before people say enough is enough?
Murderers, especially those cold blooded types need to be removed from society permanently and forcing taxpayers to provide them with shelter , food and health care for the rest of their lives while their victims are dead and buried and the victim's family grieve is an insult.
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FLT And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.Try it, you won’t regret it!………????????????.????????????????????????????????.????????????
Look, I don't like the death penalty. I really don't. Too many people have been acquitted too late. However, articles like this make we want to say "Shank him".
Why should we care what a foreign dignitary says? Much less a religious leader who has barely heard of this case?
Why should the governor overrule Congressional authority, the prosecutors, two juries (at least), and multiple judges?
Why should a brain tumor that occurred decades later have any effect?
Why is executing seven people in a year out of a country of 300 million such an appalling number?
The man, beyond any shadow of a doubt, murdered three people in cold blood. There is no doubt or question as to the facts of this case.
If you believe that the death penalty is wrong on principle or so wrong in practice that we need stop it completely, make that argument. Making specious and inane arguments only serve to weaken your case and drive people away.