Archives

Archives: July 2021

Excerpts from Reason's vaults

|

20 years ago

July 2001

"To say 'neoliberal' is the same as saying 'semiliberal' or 'pseudoliberal.' It is pure nonsense. One is either in favor of liberty or against it, but one cannot be semi-in-favor or pseudo-in-favor of liberty, just as one cannot be 'semipregnant,' 'semiliving,' or 'semidead.' The term has not been invented to express a conceptual reality, but rather, as a corrosive weapon of derision. It has been designed to devalue semantically the doctrine of liberalism. And it is liberalism—more than any other doctrine—that symbolizes the extraordinary advances that liberty has made in the long course of human civilization."
Mario Vargas Llosa
"Global Village or Global Pillage?"

"What has gone mostly unseen and unremarked upon is the effort by industries who benefit from copyright law to shift the balance of the law forever in their favor, and away from the public interest that, according to Article I of the U.S. Constitution, is supposed to be the beneficiary of copyrights."
Mike Godwin
"Copywrong"

25 years ago

July 2001

"Rather than capitalizing on the broad, if often inchoate, anti-government and pro-individualist sentiments that seem to be growing among voters, insisting on systematic libertarianism in the political arena reduces the libertarian impulse to a series of litmus tests on issues that many voters may not see as particularly important or connected: gun rights and abortion rights, property rights and drug legalization, free speech and lower taxes. To these mainstream issues the Libertarian Party platform adds such problematic esoterica as jury nullification, a reliance solely on tort law and 'strict liability' to govern pollution, and the right of individual political secession. When libertarianism is presented as an all-or-nothing bargain, interested voters are more likely to leave the whole package on the table."
Nick Gillespie
"Uncompromising Position"

"The home school movement suggests that educational choices need not be limited to public and private schools. Rather, parents can create far more flexible arrangements, relying on an array of learning services, resources, and technologies that enable their children to learn at home on a part-time or full-time basis. We can begin contemplating a future of learning opportunities analogous to the innovation and decentralization that is currently taking place in traditional workplaces."
Britton Manasco
"Special Ed"

"To achieve the social goal of a 'livable wage' (even for teenagers living with their parents), the state confiscates the assets of certain employers and forces them to give those assets to certain employees. But a fast-food restaurant has alternatives: It can buy machines, shorten its hours, perhaps even raise its prices (though this is a doubtful proposition since prices are determined, not by costs, but by supply and demand; if a restaurant could charge more for a hamburger, it would be doing so already, whatever the minimum wage)."
James Glassman
"Economics: Minimum Standards"

35 years ago

July 1986

"The drug police have to resort to such invasive surveillance techniques precisely because the 'crimes' they are trying to detect involve no victims and therefore no plaintiffs. The various transactions that take place among participants in the drug trade, from producers to traffickers to buyers, are purely private and voluntary. If I peacefully sell a substance to someone who is willing to pay for it, whose rights have been violated? If I peacefully buy a substance that someone's willing to sell me, whose rights have been violated? If I peacefully ingest the substance, whose rights have been violated? No one's."
Eric Marti
"Freedom Dies in the War on Drugs"

45 years ago

July 1976

"The essence of the State through history is a minority of the population, constituting a power elite or a 'ruling class,' governing and living off of the majority, or the 'ruled.' Since a majority cannot live parasitically off a minority without the economy and the social system breaking down very quickly, and since the majority can never act permanently by itself but must always be led by an oligarchy, every State will subsist by plundering the majority on behalf of a ruling minority."
Murray Rothbard
"America's Libertarian Revolution"

"It is no accident that conservatives tend to share attitudes in favor of free enterprise and against big government with the libertarians, and to share attitudes with the communists against personal freedom and in favor of social repression. Conservatives find their political motivation in the defense of community norms and traditional values. In this country, a few libertarian values are 'traditional,' as luck would have it. In Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia, of course, conservatives and communists differ only in their 'enemies lists,' not in their programs. Deviation from the permitted norm is a police matter."
Joe Cobb
"Frontlines"

NEXT: Brickbat: A Lesson in Ethics

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Ahhh the times when reason was libritarian. Perhaps we can get back to that some day

    1. so you want big government to step in and force a private business to accept nazis or terroristic speech……………click here.

      1. Making money online more than 800$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little ASAS A child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
        on this page…..VISIT HERE

  2. We Can’t Trust The IRS
    “What did you make of that big ProPublica story on the intimate tax information of America’s richest men? Personally, I concluded that I can’t trust the IRS…

    …“Oh, who cares?” you might ask. “The victims are billionaires!” And indeed, they are. But I care. For a start, they’re American citizens, and they’re entitled to the same rights — and protected by the same laws — as everyone else. Their privacy does not matter less than mine just because they’re richer than I am. Besides, even if one wants to be entirely amoral about it, one should consider that if their information can be spilled onto the Internet, anyone’s can. And, if you were in their shoes, you’d probably care a lot more than they do. A government that is this reckless or sinister with the information of men who are lawyered to the eyeballs is unlikely to worry too much about being reckless or sinister with your information.” – Charles Cooke

  3. July 2001 is still 20 years ago.

  4. Archives: July 2021

    Swing and a miss, Reason.

    1. It’s a piece for the July issues, for those of you in Rio Linda.

  5. It is no accident that conservatives tend to share attitudes in favor of free enterprise and against big government with the libertarians, and to share attitudes with the communists against personal freedom and in favor of social repression.

    We’re all communists now, nobody even pretends to give a shit about free enterprise and the perils of big government any more. It’s past time to burn it all down and start over.

  6. When libertarians talk free speech, gun rights, or other bill of rights issues they are usually right on target. When they veer off and want open borders, no cops or prisons, or other ideas that essentially say don’t police crime or protect borders, they attract no one to their cause except cranks. Don’t make common cause with neo marxists and other far leftie progtards. They will turn on you.

  7. “Neoliberal” means “newly in favor of liberty”. It’s only derisive insofar as johnny-come-latelies always get derided, i.e. what took you so long? So what’s the problem, Mr. Llosa?

    1. Liberal was another term Communists usurped long ago and have used to hide their true purposes behind. And Neoliberal in it’s common usage means new kind of Communist.

    2. I suspect it is the content associated with the word “Neoliberal” that draws his ire.

  8. But as we found out in The Princes Bride, one can be mostly dead.

  9. “What has gone mostly unseen and unremarked upon is the effort by industries who benefit from copyright law to shift the balance of the law forever in their favor, and away from the public interest that, according to Article I of the U.S. Constitution, is supposed to be the beneficiary of copyrights.”
    Mike Godwin
    “Copywrong”

    You know who else wanted to shift the balance of the law forever in his favor?

Please to post comments