Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Webathon

Donate Today To Support Reason's Journalism

It's been a helluva year. Now it's time for our annual webathon. If you can, please support your favorite libertarian magazine!

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 12.1.2020 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
1973 pic | Reason
(Reason)

Welcome to Reason's annual webathon week, where we ask you to support the work we do here at the magazine of free minds and free markets. 

Listen, we know this has been a helluva year for everyone. Together we weathered a bruising pandemic, an election, street protests, policy fights, and confirmation battles. Reason has been no exception to the tumult of 2020. This year has actually been a monster traffic year for us, with a huge spike in readership, viewership, and listenership. People came to Reason for the broadsides of Nick Gillespie and J.D. Tuccille, the epidemiological insights of Jacob Sullum and Ronald Bailey, the wonkery of Christian Britschgi and Eric Boehm, the investigative criminal justice reporting of C.J. Ciaramella and Elizabeth Nolan Brown, the sober legal analysis of Damon Root and the folks at The Volokh Conspiracy, the comedy stylings of Remy and the Bragg brothers, the visual storytelling of Zach Weissmueller and Jim Epstein, and much, much more from the rest of the Reason crew.

But thanks to the shenanigans of the 2020 economy, more people consuming our stuff doesn't necessarily translate into more money to make that stuff. That's where you come in. Kicking in whatever cash you can spare—truly, anything helps—means Reason can keep making the stuff you love, whether it's is our award-winning print magazine, our online stories, our many email newsletters, our array of podcasts, our videos, or our presence in your Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram feeds.

Our goal is $200,000 this year, and we hope you'll contribute. Besides the satisfaction of supporting a worthy cause (plus the extra satisfaction of knowing you are sticking it to the taxman with your deductible donation), there's some pretty good swag, including a bookmark designed by Reason contributor editor and cartoonist Peter Bagge, a 2021 calendar filled with weird and important dates in the history of freedom from the fevered brains of Meredith and Austin Bragg, autographed books, an (optional) shoutout on Facebook or Twitter, tickets to Reason events, or even lunch with an editor (pick me!) if your pants are especially fancy.

If you need an extra nudge to donate right now, on this Giving Tuesday: Donating this very moment will make your popups go away for the duration of the webathon, so you get more bang for your buck if you give ASAP.

This webathon week, you'll also have a chance to ask Reason editors anything! We'll be recording a special edition of The Reason Roundtable where we'll do our best to answer listener questions of all kinds. Send your queries about life, the universe, and everything to podcasts@reason.com by the end of the day for a chance to be included. Ask Nick Gillespie for hair tips. Ask Matt Welch for…hair tips! Ask Peter Suderman for hair tips? Ask me for, well, you know.

On a more serious note: Your donations make the work we do at Reason possible. If you already support Reason, thank you. If you're thinking about becoming a donor for the first time, thank you. This year has been absolutely wild. We hope that we played a small part in helping you get through it, and that you might consider returning the favor now.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Jo Jorgensen's 1% Triumph

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

WebathonCoronavirusNonprofitsCharity/Philanthropy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (75)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Nardz   4 years ago

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Fuck off and die

    1. Zeb   4 years ago

      I think they get some credit for keeping this forum running, despite a large portion of the content being pretty harsh (if largely deserved) criticism and insults to the magazine and its writers? But I'm still not giving them anything this year.

      1. Nardz   4 years ago

        Yes, they get credit for that.
        Don't know that anyone will visit this site when they do shut it down though.

        1. Zeb   4 years ago

          I don't know how much of their traffic is driven by the comment section. But I can't imagine many from the comments would bother with them at all if it got shut down or heavily moderated.

          1. ElvisIsReal   4 years ago

            I'd 100% drop it from my rotation.

            1. m4019597   4 years ago

              Me too.
              I come here for the comments and opinions, not the staff writing.

              Some of the writing is good, some is awful, but the comments are consistently good.

              1. Maude Worrell   4 years ago

                Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regulaer offices job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
                on this page.....work92/7 online

      2. John el Galto   4 years ago

        Because that's the only thing driving traffic to the site.

        Nobody reads their articles anymore. About 1/10 are actually good journalism, the rest; I just skip the article and go right to the comments, which are often more insightful.

        1. Sona   4 years ago

          Fantastic work-from-home opportunity for everryone... Work for three to eight hrs a day and start getting paid in the range of 7,000-14,000 dollars a month... Weekly payments...... EASY ONLINE EARNING

  2. Don't look at me!   4 years ago

    Journalism
    LOL

    1. RabbiHarveyWeinstein   4 years ago

      I plan on donating $10 to support Reason magazine. A lot of good work can be done with $5. My hope is that my $1 donation can be used to support the dissemination of a truly libertarian philosophy to the people of the world.

  3. Rat on a train   4 years ago

    please support your favorite libertarian magazine
    As soon as I find one. (former print subscriber)

    1. R Mac   4 years ago

      Same.

      1. North49   4 years ago

        Also same.

        1. jmstrongjr   4 years ago

          same.

  4. Nail   4 years ago

    No.

  5. R Mac   4 years ago

    If I saw Soave on the street I’d buy him lunch. During which I’d try to figure out what happened to his brain during the Kavanaugh hearing.

    The rest of the “journalism” at Reason this year must not have made it into the “Latest” tab on the page.

    1. RabbiHarveyWeinstein   4 years ago

      If I saw ENB on the street, I'd ask if she was interested in performing some real work. And by real work, I mean sex work.

      1. R Mac   4 years ago

        Damn, must be a pretty bad drought you’re having.

      2. Weigel's Cock Ring   4 years ago

        She’s not interested in any sex acts with a man. Have you seen what her “husband” looks like?

  6. Commenter_XY   4 years ago

    Sorry Katherine....You and your ilk picked your side. No money from my DAF will go to Unreason.

  7. Social Justice is neither   4 years ago

    Sorry but I won't be supporting marxist apologists. You tell me violence is peaceful and corruption and fraud are conspiracy theories then you want money from me to lie to me more. Fuck off and die you useless shitstains. You chose to sacrifice liberty for congenial corruption and a belligerent foreign policy that started how many wars under Obama. But at least Biden will be nice to the press and only insult the voters when he's awake past 10am that is.

    1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   4 years ago

      "marxist apologists"

      LOL

      Practically every Reason article these days has the underlying message "Drumpf is pursuing policies that are not in the financial interests of billionaires, and that's a bad thing." Which is literally the opposite of a Marxist critique.

      #BillionairesKnowBest

  8. R Mac   4 years ago

    Lol there’s 6 names of who donated and half are Reason staff.

    1. Earth Skeptic   4 years ago

      Giving money to the enterprise/state to fund your own salary is totally not socialism.

    2. Nail   4 years ago

      haha I noticed that.

    3. Rat on a train   4 years ago

      Early on it was Katherine, Matt, Nick and Richard with a combined donation of $214. It is like the change a street performer seeds so the pot isn't empty.

  9. Earth Skeptic   4 years ago

    What, is reason having a hard time keeping up with the New Koch pivot?

  10. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   4 years ago

    Please give generously so that Reason can continue being the leading journal of billionaire-funded open borders advocacy.

    Now, some of you might be wondering "Ummm, why would an operation funded by a billionaire even need my 3- or 4-digit contribution? Doesn't Charles Koch earn more than $200,000 in the time it takes me to enter my credit card info?" Well, keep this in mind. Drumpf's high-tariff / low-immigration policies have been absolutely disastrous for Mr. Koch's net worth, causing it to tumble to an abysmal $55,500,000,000.

    It's up to you to help keep the lights on at Reason HQ until Mr. Koch gets back on his feet during the Biden Administration.

    #MrKochCantBeGenerousUntilJanuary

  11. Nemo Aequalis   4 years ago

    It's would almost worth donating to see "Reason is supported by: Adolph Hitler" up on the marquee.

    Opportunities for fun!

    1. RabbiHarveyWeinstein   4 years ago

      Whatis Aleppo just donated $0.01

  12. I love REASON <3   4 years ago

    This website is the best!! Thanks Reason for everything you've done for me. I can't wait to donate. How about you?

  13. R Mac   4 years ago

    Here’s a question for all the journalism students in the class:

    What is better evidence, anonymous sources in the NYT, or hundreds of signed affidavits?

    1. Ken Shultz   4 years ago

      Is the answer Twitter?

      1. R Mac   4 years ago

        No.

        1. Minadin   4 years ago

          Is it Vox Twitter?

    2. John el Galto   4 years ago

      It depends. If it's helping the Dems, anonymous sources can be very authoritative. If it's helping the Reps, hundreds of signed affidavits are very suspect.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   4 years ago

    I'm not donating until Reason Roundup returns to its regularly scheduled 9:30AM Eastern Time postings. SHARP.

    Slackers don't deserve my $5.

    1. m4019597   4 years ago

      I want the return of a morning and afternoon round up. Once a day doesn’t cut it.

  15. lap83   4 years ago

    I assumed you were well funded by private contributors already. I don't know what else would explain your complete and utter lack of investigative journalism as of late.

  16. Ken Shultz   4 years ago

    I think we should all be grateful that Reason maintains a comment section that we can use.

    I hope they appreciate my contribution in the form of the free content I provide for their website in comments.

    I certainly enjoy reading the comments of other people here at Reason. I might not come here anymore otherwise.

    I sure hope the staff here somehow finds their way back to credibility again. It's gonna take a lot of work, but I'm rooting for ya.

    1. RabbiHarveyWeinstein   4 years ago

      Thanks for your kind words. Getting attention from lolbertarians is very important to me after being locked down for months due to COVID-19.

    2. Bill Godshall   4 years ago

      I used to enjoy the articles in Reason, but I too now come here primarily to read the comments, as many commenters are solution oriented libertarians who support free markets and free minds.

    3. Rufus The Monocled   4 years ago

      Ken,

      I've always wanted to say this.

      Look! It's K-K-K-Ken! He's come to K-K-K-Kill me!

      1. Dillinger   4 years ago

        Revenge!

    4. TripK2   4 years ago

      I enjoy your posts. Reason should be taking notes...

    5. m4019597   4 years ago

      In fairness, the brickbats column is always fun to read.

  17. Bill Godshall   4 years ago

    The article immediately preceding this one
    https://reason.com/2020/12/01/jo-jorgensens-1-triumph/
    is yet another reason (in addition to the hundreds of anti Trump diatribes the past four years) why real libertarians should not fund left wing propaganda at Reason that is deceitfully called libertarian.

  18. hamilton   4 years ago

    Might as well leave this here. Unlikely the editors will read it, but sigh:

    Reason was awesome. The Hampersand used to be awesome. A great crowd of folks and discussion and some level of support and engagement with the staff. And this wasn't even in the "back when Postrel was running the place..." days (DRINK). I gave you guys decent money to help drown the "r" every year and felt really proud of that.

    That changed. Badly.

    The approach of the staff to the commentariat moved to more straightforward contempt (deservedly so in some cases, but still). The writing became less libertarian and more, well, TEAM BLUE oriented except for drug policy. The Trump election was a disaster for your writing, though it hasn't destroyed the organization to CNN-levels. God, we're at the point where Soave is one of your most libertarian writers and it's not like he changed. (2Chilly: much love, much love). Taibbi and Greenwald are _both_ way ahead of you on the rage-against-the-machine meter at this point and they're nowhere near libertarian.

    Love and hate from the consumers can both be generators of tremendous energy for a product or company. But you guys were doing way better when you were harvesting the former. C'mon Matt, Nick. Pull this shit back in.

    I look forward with hope - probably more aspirational than anything else, at this point - to the time I'll give you money again. Not this year, again, to my deep regret.

    1. Rufus The Monocled   4 years ago

      I've been around since 2002 (?). Didn't start commenting until later. But it was quite the fun and eclectic crowd as you say. I personally learned a lot. Heck, Reason taught me a lot.

      Oh well.

    2. Zeb   4 years ago

      Yeah, what he said.

    3. bignose   4 years ago

      +1

    4. Blargrifth   4 years ago

      Reason led the charge in the media to defeat Harris' primary campaign (Kamala is a Cop!). They regularly published content criticizing the proposals of Sanders, Warren, and Biden. And that is only talking about presidential politics. Reason, again leading the charge in many ways, regularly publishes the impact of interventionist policies at state and local level, policies of both parties.

      It takes some very deliberate tunnel vision to call Reason "team blue."

  19. Sometimes Bad Is Bad   4 years ago

    Nope you all ended up promoting Biden by trying to sink Trump. Koch and the Lincoln project faggot RINOs can fuck off.

  20. Rufus The Monocled   4 years ago

    I was disappointed with the coverage of Trump's interesting Presidency. There was a lot of room to explore it and offer nuance. Instead, it was tiresome TDS shtick readers can go literally elsewhere to get.

    Trump was punk. He was beating on the brat with a baseball bat. It was libertarian in its somewhat fuck off approach. He was the asshole that was needed.

    /raises lighter in an empty arena.

    1. Dillinger   4 years ago

      >> It was libertarian in its somewhat fuck off approach. He was the asshole that was needed.

      I loved this. It was fun.

    2. Ken Shultz   4 years ago

      The arena isn't empty.

  21. H. Farnham   4 years ago

    Hell, one of the last unmoderated forums on the interwebs (that a respectable gent like myself would visit anyway). They let people abuse the shit out of 'em on here... that's worth a few bucks from me.

  22. Ra's al Gore   4 years ago

    Nope. You wanted Biden, and you'll get a Socialist (Harris) running twice as an incumbent (the Constitution lets you serve 10 years if you take over the last part of someone else's term).

    You watched "The Science" being used for freedom and economy killing lockdowns without questioning the 40 cycle PCR or our less restrictive definition of a C19 death, both of which will be changed now that there is a Dem in the White House. This will be used to say "submission to a Government that followed The Science saved us all and we must continue to submit or be Science Deniers" once case and death counts drop due to the new definitions.

    Free minds and free markets? Nope, submission to The State that saved us all. You could have put yourselves on the record before that happened, but you lacked the balls to do so. Orange Man Bad.

    Enjoy our new Wall Street Wars and sellout to human rights abusing China - what's a few dead non-Anglo foreigners when there is an Orange Man to remove.

    Seriously, fuck all of you with Postrel's dick. She has more of one than anyone else left on your staff. Eat cat food. Blow random organs coming thru holes in mens' room doors. Sell your organs on the Chinese black market. Do anything but ask me for a dime.

  23. Unicorn Abattoir   4 years ago

    Find a way to keep the spambots out of the comments. Then maybe I'll donate.

    1. Dillinger   4 years ago

      I made $7.90 an hour at shoprite and donated it all to Reason.

      1. Minadin   4 years ago

        If I've been reading the spambots correctly, the trick is to quit your job at shoprite.

        1. Quit your job at shoprite
        2. ????
        3. Profit
        4. Donate to Reason

    2. Rufus The Monocled   4 years ago

      I made $3.43 in one day teaching Canadian to Americans! See how I did it!

      1. Rat on a train   4 years ago

        Eh?

  24. Dillinger   4 years ago

    I appreciate the forum this is literally the only place in the universe I post ... mostly for the commentary ... mostly

  25. ElvisIsReal   4 years ago

    Glen Greenwald got your money this year. Best $50 I spent.

    1. TripK2   4 years ago

      Based

  26. Taxidermied Cat   4 years ago

    I started reading Reason during Orange's peach mint because I thought they were doing a good job explaining what was going on.

    Then I realized I was actually reading the comments.

  27. Brian Dixon   4 years ago

    Sorry, Reason, but you've failed to earn my donation dollars this year. I haven't seen nearly enough skepticism from you about the dangerously panicky prevailing narrative on COVID-19. My money will go instead to the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER). Under Jeffrey Tucker's leadership, they have been doing it right.

  28. TripK2   4 years ago

    I gotta say, reason doesn’t do much to differentiate itself from the rest of the Democrat media sites. This place hasn’t seemed very libertarian in a long time. The comment section is even in decline ever since the split to glibertarians.

    If this magazine had more interesting perspectives with a libertarian slant, I’d be interested in donating.

    1. Rat on a train   4 years ago

      Shikha's gone. That's a start.

  29. PurplePros   4 years ago

    How much do we need to donate to get BOTS hired to algorithmically keep comments within 3 zip codes of the subject ???? Asking for 540,000 friends

  30. ByteRot   4 years ago

    I'm inclined to donate a bit so I don't have to suffer as many of the abominable auto-play anyclip ads while I read the comments.
    Being libertarians, surely you can find a way to accommodate my request to earmark all of my donation to fund more Remy.

    1. ByteRot   4 years ago

      Oh, I suppose it's also worth patting you guys on the back for the Roundtable and the Soho Forum.

  31. John el Galto   4 years ago

    To Support Reason's "Journalism"

    Had to put journalism in quotes there...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!