Blood Donors

Canada Inches Closer to Allowing More People To Be Paid for Plasma

For too long, our northern neighbors have depended on plasma imported from the U.S. to meet demand. With the passage of new legislation in Alberta, this may change.


The U.S., one of the few places where blood plasma donors are legally allowed to receive compensation, currently provides about 70 percent of the world's supply. With the passage of new legislation, Alberta, a province in Canada—which has allowed private organizations to pay for plasma in select cities and provinces for years—is inching closer to solving its own plasma shortage problems.

Albertans will soon be able to receive payment for their blood and plasma donations. Bill 204, the Voluntary Blood Donations Repeal Act, was introduced by Tany Yao, a member of the legislative assembly for Alberta's provincial government, and passed in the legislature this week. It must now get royal assent—a mere formality—for it to become law. The bill overturns a 2017 prohibition on paid plasma, and will allow private companies to pay plasma donors for their efforts. If they so choose, people will still be able to donate blood and plasma without receiving compensation via Canadian Blood Services.

The bill was opposed by nurses unions, which claim patients who rely on plasma therapies will suffer from this. "While its supporters claim Bill 204 will address the sufficiency of the supply of plasma in Canada, it will in fact do the exact opposite," said Linda Silas, president of the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions, in a press release. "As our donors come to expect payment, our voluntary donor base for both blood and plasma will be jeopardized."

United Nurses of Alberta's president Heather Smith told Global News that "the government is putting its ideology and desire to support profiteers above what is actually safe for Albertans and Canadians." Elsewhere she said that "donating blood should not be viewed as a business venture."

But Smith is wrong to act as if these shadowy "profiteers" support harming patients, when in fact plasma sellers are the very people trying to help those in need (with, yes, some money thrown in for their time and discomfort). After all, paid plasma accounts for 89 percent of the world's total supply, which constantly teeters on the brink of shortage. Many patients and organizations that advocate on their behalf have come out in favor of Bill 204. 

The Network of Rare Blood Disorder Organizations (NRBDO) issued a statement reminding that "with no evidence of safety risks, and no evidence of threats to the voluntary collection of blood, compensated collection of plasma can help with the global and Canadian plasma supply shortage, helping to ensure patients can access plasma-derived medicinal (PDMPs) products when they need them." 

They're right. Blood plasma therapy keeps many people with autoimmune and immunodeficiency disorders alive and well. And there is no good evidence to suggest that paid plasma is less safe than plasma given by uncompensated donors. In fact, the plasma donation process is much longer and more cumbersome than standard whole blood donation. As Peter Jaworski wrote in Reason, "Unlike blood, which takes approximately 30 minutes to donate and is possible to do once every 56 days, donating plasma takes about two hours, with 40 minutes of 'needle-in' time, and we need people to do it much more often—three times a month or more."

Canadian Blood Services currently struggles to source all the necessary plasma to serve the country's patients, with 83 percent of its supply imported from the United States. It's a sad irony that while many Canadian provinces preclude their citizens from getting paid, the nation is reliant on plasma imports from donors elsewhere—donors who have, in fact, been paid.

Yao, the bill's sponsor, tells Reason that he feels "buoyed by the fact" that countries "that do allow for compensated donations…have higher donation percentages than those currently here in Canada." Yao also registered his disappointment that labor unions like the United Nurses of Alberta were so vocally opposed to his bill, since "professional health care workers should have the pragmatic understanding of the pharmaceutical industry." 

With no reason to believe payment taints the safety of plasma donations, and so many countries struggling to produce enough domestic plasma to serve patients in need, Alberta's repeal will help Canada better deliver lifesaving treatments to the many patients who depend on them.

NEXT: Coronavirus Curfews Are Trending Again, Despite Total Lack of Evidence They Help

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. [ USA WORK AT HOME ] Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relative by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home………..USA HOME JOB.

    1. I am now making more than 3230 dollars per day by working online home without investing any money.Join this link posting job now and start earning without investing or selling anything.

      Follow Instructions Here……. Home Profit System

  2. So… the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions thinks that paying people for their time donating plasma will result in fewer donors… makes sense.

    1. Seems strange that if they have to import now, from a country which pays for plasma, that their non-payment scheme ain’t working like the nurses claim to pretend to think it’s working.

      1. Yeah, I can’t figure out what their angle is here. Why would they even care where/how the plasma is sourced?

        Maybe Canadian Blood Services is fully staffed by dues-paying RN’s, and they’re worried that these evil profiteers will bring in scabs that might be able to do the work more efficiently.

        1. You are most likely correct

          1. Morbidly perverse, if so.

            1. Start making extra income Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by working just online. I have made $28K in this month by working online. Its a simple and easy home job and even a little child can do this job online and makes real money yes….. WORK24HERE

        2. Why would they even care where/how the plasma is sourced?

          Are you kidding? To a Progressive like Trudeau, getting to steal the excess fluid out of the blood of their constituents is even better than a new tax.

        3. the cynic in me says they’re just angling for a way to get ‘their cut’

  3. A lot of people call Alberta Canada’s Texas, but culturally it’s a more heavily populated North Dakota.
    It’s by far the most natively libertarian province, though.

    1. go Flames.

    2. A lot of people call Alberta Canada’s Texas

      Hey, pardner, it is going to be 80 degrees today in Austin. It will be 18 degrees in Calgary. How dare you associate that frozen hellscape with Texas?

      1. I didn’t Chuck, I said a lot of people call it that. I associated it with North Dakota.

        1. 34 degrees in Fargo? I have the air conditioning on today.

          1. 34°? My weather app says it’s 1°.

            1. Get outta here with your slaver Metric system.

      2. 80° sounds more like a hellscape to me than 18°. That’s damn near the boiling point of water, while 18 is a pleasant nighttime low.

  4. You’re missing the point, MikeP2. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that all your claims about fraud in PA are clear and easily provable. Nevertheless, when you roll up to the national level and pro forma the results, it remains too evenly divided for either party to claim a “mandate” – which was all that ABC was saying Read More.

    1. love this bot responding to MikeP2 who did not comment.

  5. It must now get royal assent—a mere formality—for it to become law.

    Jesus, Canada, what millennia is it?

    1. America elects their king whose power is anything but symbolic.

  6. I sold plasma many times my senior year in college, back in 1980-81. The extra money came in handy and I spent it all on food and beer. As I recall I got $20 each time. Then my good friend and I usually would go eat at our favorite BBQ restaurant that had an all-you-could-eat food bar. After that, we had just enough to buy a six pack of St. Pauli Girl or something similar. Good times.

    1. Three beers apiece, you madmen.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.