Ballot Initiatives

California's Attorney General Decides How Ballot Initiatives Are Summarized. He's Happy To Abuse This Power.

Xavier Becerra conceals tax increases and reframes a gig economy proposition to hurt its chances.

|

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is engaging in the Golden State custom of meddling with the wording of ballot initiatives to influence voter behavior.

Ballot initiatives and referendums are supposed to be a way for California voters to bypass entrenched political interests when lawmakers refuse to consider policies that voters support or pass laws that they do not. Yet California's political class has a long history of putting its thumb on the scale to influence the outcome of the vote. One of those mechanisms is writing the initiative summary. That power is vested in the attorney general, who is beholden to a political party whose work and budget is heavily affected by voters' behavior.

This November, California voters will have 12 propositions to consider along with all the candidates running for office. But for two of the ballot initiatives, Democratic Attorney General Xavier Becerra has used his power to subtly control how the initiative is summarized, in one case to help it pass, in the other, to turn voters against it.

Proposition 15 would scale back some of the government limitations of Proposition 13, the decades-old law that severely restrains the ability of state and local governments to raise taxes, particularly on property. Proposition 15 would eliminate the prohibitions on increasing the tax rates on commercial properties. This will lead to likely billions more in revenue for the state as a result of significant tax increases.

But you won't find any references to tax increases in Becerra's just-released summary. Instead, the title of Proposition 15 reads that it "increases funding for pubic schools, community colleges, and local government services by changing tax assessment of commercial and industry property." To be fair, the full description of the bill does make it clear that the state expects there will be a "net increase in annual property tax revenues of $7.5 billion to $12 billion." But rather than presenting Proposition 15 as a tax increase, it's deliberately framed as some sort of market correction, saying it will require that these properties "be taxed based on current market value."

Dan Walters, a longtime columnist on Sacramento politics, noted that Proposition 15 is sponsored by labor groups and endorsed by the Democratic Party, of which Becerra is a member and leader. By shielding and downplaying the tax increase that will result from the initiative passing, he is attempting to influence how voters perceive it in a way that favors his party.

By the same token, but in the opposite direction, consider Proposition 22. This ballot initiative is a response to the passage of A.B. 5 in 2019. A.B. 5 severely constrains the ability of individuals in California to work as freelancers and independent contractors and forces employers to hire them as employees and pay them benefits. It's a deliberate attack on rideshare services and the entire gig economy, but the bill was written so broadly it has hampered the work of freelance writers, musicians, beauticians, and thousands of citizens who actually don't want to have employers and want more control of their own hours and working conditions. All of this is for the benefit of labor unions in California, which see the gig economy as undermining their influence and membership.

The entire law is terrible and should be tossed out, but failing that, companies like Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, and drivers have introduced Proposition 22 to specifically exempt rideshare and delivery drivers from A.B. 5. But that would not be what unions want, and Becerra gets thousands of dollars in donations from unions representing both state and private sector employees.

So when Proposition 22 was first circulated, the title said it "changes employment classification rules for app-based transportation and delivery workers." But now that it's going to be on the ballot, Becerra has altered the title so that Prop. 22 "exempts app-based transportation and delivery companies from providing employee benefits to certain drivers and delivery workers."

This rephrasing makes it appear that the bill takes away something that these people are entitled to rather than clearly explaining that what Prop. 22 does is allow drivers to continue working as freelance contractors and not as full-time employees. In exchange, they'll be giving up certain benefits that full-time employees receive.

Now, of course, reading the ballot initiative itself will explain more accurately what it does, and we'll no doubt be getting massive media blitzes from both sides. But that title has been specifically written to make it appear as though a benefit is being forcibly taken away from these drivers, even though many drivers would rather be gig workers for any number of reasons.

This isn't the first time Becerra has made such a change, and he's not the first attorney general to use his authority this way. Becerra used his position two years ago to describe a proposition scaling back gas taxes as "eliminat[ing] certain road repair and transportation funding."

When Sen. Kamala Harris (D–Calif.), possibly soon to be named Joe Biden's vice-presidential pick, served as attorney general, we saw her do something similar. When some pension reformers introduced a ballot initiative in 2015 to try to do something about the financial ticking time bomb of public employee pension debts consuming municipal budgets, Harris used her position to change the way it was framed.

Her office summarized the bill by saying that it "eliminates constitutional protections for vested pension and retiree healthcare benefits for current public employees… ." This made it appear as though the proposition would cause current public employees to lose their current pensions and healthcare benefits. But that simply wasn't true. It allowed cities and voters more flexibility to decide how or whether to expand pension offerings in the future. But it specifically stated that it did not scale back any existing benefits or agreements for public employees.

But the unions, of course, hated the proposition, and Harris' description was for their benefit. The backers of the proposition fought the rewording but failed. They then yanked the initiative rather than wage a costly battle to overcome the way the proposition had been presented to voters.

Kevin Kiley, a Republican state assemblyman from Rocklin, has proposed taking the power to summarize ballot initiatives away from the attorney general and handing it over to the state's Legislative Analyst's Office, which has a pretty solid history of accurately and impartially describing the content and potential consequences of bills and propositions.

Kiley's proposed amendment to the state's constitution has, predictably, gone absolutely nowhere. Maybe he should consider a ballot initiative.

Advertisement

NEXT: Federal Cops Are Leaving Portland. But Will the Standoff Really End?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. One party rule. Better get ready America.

    1. I basically make about $12,000-$18,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it . DSw This is what I’ve been doing old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 10-13 hours a week from home………..Cash Mony System

    2. ●▬▬▬▬PART TIME JOBS▬▬▬▬▬●

      I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i’m my non-public boss. that is what I do……
      ↓↓↓↓COPY THIS SITE↓↓↓↓

      HERE►>>>Click Here For Full Detail.

  2. A headline to which the only appropriate response is “No shit.”

    1. Kamela Harris was a master of this. When they did the plastic bag ban initiative they made sound as if you voted against the ban, you were giving the stores 10 cents for every bag you used. A feature of the ruling class mentality of California politicians.

  3. At the end of the day, we get the assholes we elect. And California, being heavily populated by assholes, well we elect the best assholes Union money can buy.

    I can guarantee you the partial repeal of Prop 13 is going to pass, whether they fuck with the language or not. People are convinced our schools don’t get enough money to…um…have zoom meetings 2 hours a week. Any time the state says “We’re giving more money to schools” these people vote for it. Around 60% of this state is not serious about its money, and so it overwhelmingly elects politicians who are not serious about the state’s money.

  4. This happens in other states, too. Here in Oklahoma, we had an initiative to allow medical cannabis back in 2016. The Attorney-General, Scott Pruitt, wrote a description so one-sided that the group which sponsored the initiative sued. The Supreme Court ruled against Pruitt, and it eventually got on the ballot two years late, and it won easily.
    By that time, Pruitt had been placed in charge of the EPA, and then fired after blowing a lot of government money on a cone of silence for his office.

  5. And Kamala Harris engaged in the same shenanigans when she was CA AG.

  6. And the GOP does the same shit. But they add the extra hypocrisy in the form of changing the rules when they lose elections.

    From https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/07/north-carolina-gops-plan-to-deceive-voters-about-its-radical-ballot-measures.html :

    “That includes lying to voters about what the new laws would do. In 2016, the GOP Legislature passed a bill governing the summaries of constitutional amendments that appear on the ballot. These summaries, known as “captions” or “titles,” are vitally important, because they introduce many voters to the proposals for the first time. That 2016 law tasked a three-member panel—the attorney general, the secretary of state, and the legislative services officer—with writing the captions. At the time, the composition of this panel would’ve skewed 2–1 Republican.

    Just months later, though, Democrat Josh Stein won the state attorney general’s race. The secretary of state is still Elaine Marshall, a seemingly unbeatable Democrat who has served since 1996. Only the legislative services officer, Paul Coble, is a Republican. Now that Democrats have a 2–1 edge on the panel, Republican House Speaker Tim Moore has decided that they might “misrepresent and politicize” the captions. So Republican leadership took the highly unusual step of calling a special legislative session to change the 2016 law before ballots are printed and give themselves authority over the phrasing of the amendments. It’s quite unusual for a Legislature as a whole to determine ballot titles, which do often tilt the outcome of elections. Many states rely on nonpartisan commissions or election officials to draft this language. Regardless, North Carolina’s unorthodox new bill is sailing through the Legislature.

    Republicans have already proffered their preferred captions—and, unsurprisingly, they are highly misleading. The election board amendment, if passed, would seize an immense amount of power from the governor. But you’d never guess that from the GOP caption, which speaks vaguely of “clarify[ing] the appointment authority of the Legislative and Judicial Branches.” The amendment shrinking the governor’s ability to fill judicial vacancies is framed as “implement[ing] a nonpartisan merit-based system.” A voter with little background knowledge of these measures might assume that they tinker with the administration of elections and the judiciary. She would never guess that they fundamentally overhaul the balance of power between the branches of government, aggrandizing the Legislature’s authority at the expense of the governor, and at the expense of citizens’ right to vote.”

  7. job opportunity for everyone! Work from comfort of your home, on your computer And you cAn work with your own working hours. You cAn work this job As A pArt time or As A full time job. You cAn eArn from 65$ An hour to 1000$ A dAy! There is no limitAtions, it All depends from you And how much you wAnt to eArn eAch dAy…..Click Here For Full Detail.

  8. Politicians lying? I’m shocked I tell you. shocked!

    Politicians will lie as long as the media who are on their side protect them. The facts in this article will never appear in the LA Times, SF Chronicle, Sac Bee, SD Union-Tribune, or any other newspaper that supports these guys. So the public that needs to see this never will.

    This is happening all over the U.S. and the right is just as guilty except more on radio and some TV.

    The Founding Fathers knew this (as many of them were liars too) so they gave the media a special call-out in the Bill of Rights to protect them from political hacks. They never thought that the media would get in bed with these scumbags.

  9. Google easily work and google pays me every hour and every week just $5K to $8K for doing online work from home. I am a universty student and I work n my part time just 2 to 3 hours a day easily from home. Now every one can earn extra cash for doing online home system and make a good life by just open this website and follow instructions on this page………click for jobs its a limited offER.

  10. To be fair, the full description of the bill does make it clear
    When I lived in California, they sent an election booklet that included a sample ballot, candidate statements, proposition summaries, pro and con statements with rebuttals, and the full text of every proposition. I doubt many people read it. Voting was based on tribes, slogans and emotions.

  11. Where have you been #ChickenLittle? In California, 58 counties, 451 cities, 983 school districts, 71 community college districts, and 3000+ special districts have been practicing local measure ballot lawlessness for nearly 40 years. Every local measure, especially tax measures, are designed by public opinion firms to get a YES vote. And they get away with it, despite statutes prohibiting it! Why wouldn’t the AG decide to get a piece of that action? #AB195 #HonestBallots

    P.S. Reason really needs to do something about all the work-from-home spam polluting its comment areas.

  12. When a state controls the summary of a proposed initiative, and distorts the meaning of an initiative, the state alters and distorts the political speech of the proponents of the initiative, violating the First Amendment rights of the proponents and of the supporters of the initiative. That is the basis for a First Amendment challenge in federal court. All you need to win that case is an intellectually honest federal judge!

    1. That would be beautiful. California is such a shit show. But it’s hard to find a place with better work opportunities for technology and better weather.

  13. A headline to which the only appropriate response is “No shit.”

    http://www.beggar.news

    Begging is an old industry, but it is not a derogatory term. It is a life experience. So Beggar news is a platform that you can post your begging information in article, When a philanthropist will fulfill your wishes, You, the philanthropist and us all are happy.

    Good luck, Beggars!

Please to post comments